about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,895 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Google searches for 'matt levine' and the second variable is The number of college administrators in Ohio.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more people delved into the world of finance through Matt Levine's writings, they were inspired to apply their newfound knowledge in unexpected ways. This led to a surge in individuals creating their own financial theories, prompting colleges in Ohio to hire additional administrators to review and integrate these unconventional ideas into their academic programs. It's a case of Matt-ematical expansion in the education sector!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image in the style of a funny image macro. Depict a computer screen displaying multiple Google searches for "Matt Levine" with a chart showing a steady increase in the number of college administrators in Ohio. Surrounding the screen, show bustling college campuses with students and professors engaging in lively discussions about innovative financial theories inspired by Levine's writing. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Google searches for 'matt levine' and The number of college administrators in Ohio. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie a funny image macro An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Parallax art
ChatGPT: a funny image macro

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Google searches for 'matt levine' and The number of college administrators in Ohio, in the following situation: As more people delved into the world of finance through Matt Levine's writings, they were inspired to apply their newfound knowledge in unexpected ways. This led to a surge in individuals creating their own financial theories, prompting colleges in Ohio to hire additional administrators to review and integrate these unconventional ideas into their academic programs. It's a case of Matt-ematical expansion in the education sector!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A computer screen displaying multiple Google searches for "Matt Levine" alongside a chart showing a steady increase in the number of college administrators in Ohio. The screen is surrounded by bustling college campuses, where students and professors are engaged in lively discussions about innovative financial theories inspired by Levine's writing.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image macro ] and depicting this scene: A computer screen displaying multiple Google searches for "Matt Levine" alongside a chart showing a steady increase in the number of college administrators in Ohio. The screen is surrounded by bustling college campuses, where students and professors are engaged in lively discussions about innovative financial theories inspired by Levine's writing. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image in the style of a funny image macro. Depict a computer screen displaying multiple Google searches for "Matt Levine" with a chart showing a steady increase in the number of college administrators in Ohio. Surrounding the screen, show bustling college campuses with students and professors engaging in lively discussions about innovative financial theories inspired by Levine's writing.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in matt levine (Google searches for 'matt levine') caused The number of college administrators in Ohio to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The (Non) Noble Nexus: Navigating the Nexus between Google Searches for 'Matt Levine' and The Number of college administrators in Ohio

The Journal of Quirky Interdisciplinary Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'matt levine' and The number of college administrators in Ohio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9524675 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The (Non) Noble Nexus: Navigating the Nexus between Google Searches for 'Matt Levine' and The Number of college administrators in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the seemingly improbable and comical correlation between Google searches for the financial columnist 'Matt Levine' and the number of college administrators in Ohio. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to scrutinize this unlikely relationship. Surprisingly, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9524675 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022, indicating a remarkably strong positive association between the two variables. The findings suggest that the interest in Matt Levine, known for his wry observations on finance, could somehow be linked to the staffing levels of college administrators in the state of Ohio.

A dad joke, you ask? Why, certainly! It seems that "googling" the connection between Matt Levine and college administrators is no longer just a "search" for knowledge, but an unexpected journey into the wittily absurd.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'matt levine' and The number of college administrators in Ohio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The (Non) Noble Nexus: Navigating the Nexus between Google Searches for 'Matt Levine' and The Number of college administrators in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the seemingly improbable and comical correlation between Google searches for the financial columnist 'Matt Levine' and the number of college administrators in Ohio. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to scrutinize this unlikely relationship. Surprisingly, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9524675 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022, indicating a remarkably strong positive association between the two variables. The findings suggest that the interest in Matt Levine, known for his wry observations on finance, could somehow be linked to the staffing levels of college administrators in the state of Ohio.

A dad joke, you ask? Why, certainly! It seems that "googling" the connection between Matt Levine and college administrators is no longer just a "search" for knowledge, but an unexpected journey into the wittily absurd.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The quest for knowledge can sometimes lead to unexpected discoveries. In the realm of research, one may stumble upon correlations that seem unlikely, if not downright ludicrous. This paper delves into one such curious correlation, examining the perplexing connection between Google searches for the financial columnist, Matt Levine, and the number of college administrators in Ohio.

Before delving into the statistical intricacies, let us pause for a moment to appreciate the irony of this investigation. It seems the search for Matt Levine has extended beyond financial analysis and delved into the realm of educational administration. One might even say that these unexpected findings have turned our statistical journey into a "Matt-hematical" puzzle.

The notion of a causal link between an individual's online popularity and the number of college administrators in a specific state appears preposterous at first glance. However, in the realm of statistics, one must approach such correlations with a healthy dose of skepticism and an open mind. After all, as researchers, it is our duty to unravel the mysteries of the data, no matter how bizarre they may seem.

As we embark on this scholarly expedition, let us not forget to maintain a sense of humor amidst the complexity of our statistical analyses. It appears that this foray into the nexus of finance and academia has turned our research into a "Levine" paradox of sorts, inviting us to reconsider the boundaries of statistical relationships and the interplay of seemingly unrelated variables.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'matt levine' and The number of college administrators in Ohio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The (Non) Noble Nexus: Navigating the Nexus between Google Searches for 'Matt Levine' and The Number of college administrators in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the seemingly improbable and comical correlation between Google searches for the financial columnist 'Matt Levine' and the number of college administrators in Ohio. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to scrutinize this unlikely relationship. Surprisingly, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9524675 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022, indicating a remarkably strong positive association between the two variables. The findings suggest that the interest in Matt Levine, known for his wry observations on finance, could somehow be linked to the staffing levels of college administrators in the state of Ohio.

A dad joke, you ask? Why, certainly! It seems that "googling" the connection between Matt Levine and college administrators is no longer just a "search" for knowledge, but an unexpected journey into the wittily absurd.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The quest for knowledge can sometimes lead to unexpected discoveries. In the realm of research, one may stumble upon correlations that seem unlikely, if not downright ludicrous. This paper delves into one such curious correlation, examining the perplexing connection between Google searches for the financial columnist, Matt Levine, and the number of college administrators in Ohio.
Before delving into the statistical intricacies, let us pause for a moment to appreciate the irony of this investigation. It seems the search for Matt Levine has extended beyond financial analysis and delved into the realm of educational administration. One might even say that these unexpected findings have turned our statistical journey into a "Matt-hematical" puzzle.
The notion of a causal link between an individual's online popularity and the number of college administrators in a specific state appears preposterous at first glance. However, in the realm of statistics, one must approach such correlations with a healthy dose of skepticism and an open mind. After all, as researchers, it is our duty to unravel the mysteries of the data, no matter how bizarre they may seem.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, let us not forget to maintain a sense of humor amidst the complexity of our statistical analyses. It appears that this foray into the nexus of finance and academia has turned our research into a "Levine" paradox of sorts, inviting us to reconsider the boundaries of statistical relationships and the interplay of seemingly unrelated variables.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith and Doe," the authors find a correlation between online search trends and various socio-economic indicators. Similarly, "Jones et al." elucidate the intricate patterns underlying online search behaviors and their unexpected connections to seemingly unrelated phenomena. However, the specific amalgamation of Google searches for 'Matt Levine' and the number of college administrators in Ohio has remained conspicuously absent from prior scholarly discourse.

Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Wealth of Nations" by Adam Smith and "Finance for Dummies" by Eric Tyson provide valuable insights into economic trends and financial analysis, albeit without delving into the peculiar nexus at hand. On the other hand, fiction works such as "The Devil Wears Prada" by Lauren Weisberger and "Good to Great" by Jim Collins hint at the intersection of business and academia, instigating a semblance of relevance, albeit tangential, to our investigation.

Venturing beyond traditional academic resources, the authors have meticulously surveyed an eclectic array of sources, including but not limited to self-help books, fortune cookies, and even grocery store receipts. In a bizarre turn of events, a particularly enlightening revelation emerged from a discarded CVS receipt, containing a cryptic message about the cosmic connection between finance enthusiasts and bureaucratic staffing levels.

Speaking of cosmic connections, why did the financial columnist refuse to play hide and seek? He always felt like he was too visible, much like the surprisingly conspicuous relationship between his online presence and the cadre of college administrators in Ohio!



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'matt levine' and The number of college administrators in Ohio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The (Non) Noble Nexus: Navigating the Nexus between Google Searches for 'Matt Levine' and The Number of college administrators in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the seemingly improbable and comical correlation between Google searches for the financial columnist 'Matt Levine' and the number of college administrators in Ohio. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to scrutinize this unlikely relationship. Surprisingly, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9524675 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022, indicating a remarkably strong positive association between the two variables. The findings suggest that the interest in Matt Levine, known for his wry observations on finance, could somehow be linked to the staffing levels of college administrators in the state of Ohio.

A dad joke, you ask? Why, certainly! It seems that "googling" the connection between Matt Levine and college administrators is no longer just a "search" for knowledge, but an unexpected journey into the wittily absurd.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The quest for knowledge can sometimes lead to unexpected discoveries. In the realm of research, one may stumble upon correlations that seem unlikely, if not downright ludicrous. This paper delves into one such curious correlation, examining the perplexing connection between Google searches for the financial columnist, Matt Levine, and the number of college administrators in Ohio.
Before delving into the statistical intricacies, let us pause for a moment to appreciate the irony of this investigation. It seems the search for Matt Levine has extended beyond financial analysis and delved into the realm of educational administration. One might even say that these unexpected findings have turned our statistical journey into a "Matt-hematical" puzzle.
The notion of a causal link between an individual's online popularity and the number of college administrators in a specific state appears preposterous at first glance. However, in the realm of statistics, one must approach such correlations with a healthy dose of skepticism and an open mind. After all, as researchers, it is our duty to unravel the mysteries of the data, no matter how bizarre they may seem.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, let us not forget to maintain a sense of humor amidst the complexity of our statistical analyses. It appears that this foray into the nexus of finance and academia has turned our research into a "Levine" paradox of sorts, inviting us to reconsider the boundaries of statistical relationships and the interplay of seemingly unrelated variables.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

The methodology adopted in this study revolves around the rigorous collection and analysis of data pertaining to Google searches for 'Matt Levine' and the number of college administrators in Ohio. The data was primarily sourced from Google Trends, a tool that quantifies the relative search interest over time, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, where employment data for various sectors, including education administration, is meticulously documented.

To initiate the data collection process, our research team navigated the virtual realm, delving into the wondrous world wide web to extract granules of information on the search volume for 'Matt Levine' and the employment figures for college administrators in the Buckeye State. As we ventured into the labyrinth of search algorithms and statistical databases, it became evident that our pursuit was akin to a quest for hidden treasure, albeit one buried within the digital landscape.

The time frame for data collection spanned from 2004 to 2022, encompassing an extensive period of exploration to capture the nuances of search trends and employment variations. This temporal expanse not only enabled us to gauge the fluctuations in public interest regarding Matt Levine but also allowed us to scrutinize the vicissitudes in the labor force engaged in the administrative echelons of Ohio's higher education institutions.

As we meticulously combed through the data, sifting through virtual haystacks in search of statistical needles, we encountered peculiar patterns and incredibly strong correlations between the search interest in 'Matt Levine' and the population of college administrators. The unexpected coherence between these seemingly disparate variables prompted the formulation of empirical models and statistical analyses to gauge the robustness of this association. It was as if we stumbled upon a statistical quirk, a "Google-esque" enigma that beckoned us to unravel its perplexing mysteries.

Utilizing various statistical techniques, such as Pearson's correlation coefficient and multiple regression analyses, we endeavored to delve into the depths of this unusual nexus. The statistical tests were employed to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship between Google searches for 'Matt Levine' and the number of college administrators in Ohio, teasing out the nuances of this unanticipated bond.

Our statistical voyage traversed through the sea of p-values and hypothesis testing, navigating treacherous waters to ascertain the significance of our findings. The results yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9524675 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a conspicuously strong positive correlation between the two variables. This statistical revelation was met with equal parts incredulity and fascination, for it seemed that the esoteric musings of Matt Levine had indeed carved an unexpected path through the bureaucracy of educational administration in Ohio.

In essence, the methodology encompassed a blend of digital exploration, statistical scrutiny, and an unwavering commitment to unraveling the quirky correlations that lay hidden amidst the labyrinth of data. Our scholarly escapade was akin to a scientific sojourn, guided by the compass of curiosity and illuminated by the beacon of statistical inquiry, leading us to unearth the (non) noble nexus between Google searches for 'Matt Levine' and the number of college administrators in Ohio.

If necessity is the mother of invention, then curiosity is the mischievous aunt who prods and pokes at the boundaries of imagination, ushering researchers into the uncharted terrain of unexpected discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'matt levine' and The number of college administrators in Ohio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9524675, r-squared of 0.9071943, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The (Non) Noble Nexus: Navigating the Nexus between Google Searches for 'Matt Levine' and The Number of college administrators in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the seemingly improbable and comical correlation between Google searches for the financial columnist 'Matt Levine' and the number of college administrators in Ohio. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to scrutinize this unlikely relationship. Surprisingly, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9524675 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022, indicating a remarkably strong positive association between the two variables. The findings suggest that the interest in Matt Levine, known for his wry observations on finance, could somehow be linked to the staffing levels of college administrators in the state of Ohio.

A dad joke, you ask? Why, certainly! It seems that "googling" the connection between Matt Levine and college administrators is no longer just a "search" for knowledge, but an unexpected journey into the wittily absurd.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The quest for knowledge can sometimes lead to unexpected discoveries. In the realm of research, one may stumble upon correlations that seem unlikely, if not downright ludicrous. This paper delves into one such curious correlation, examining the perplexing connection between Google searches for the financial columnist, Matt Levine, and the number of college administrators in Ohio.
Before delving into the statistical intricacies, let us pause for a moment to appreciate the irony of this investigation. It seems the search for Matt Levine has extended beyond financial analysis and delved into the realm of educational administration. One might even say that these unexpected findings have turned our statistical journey into a "Matt-hematical" puzzle.
The notion of a causal link between an individual's online popularity and the number of college administrators in a specific state appears preposterous at first glance. However, in the realm of statistics, one must approach such correlations with a healthy dose of skepticism and an open mind. After all, as researchers, it is our duty to unravel the mysteries of the data, no matter how bizarre they may seem.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, let us not forget to maintain a sense of humor amidst the complexity of our statistical analyses. It appears that this foray into the nexus of finance and academia has turned our research into a "Levine" paradox of sorts, inviting us to reconsider the boundaries of statistical relationships and the interplay of seemingly unrelated variables.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between Google searches for 'Matt Levine' and the number of college administrators in Ohio. The correlation coefficient of 0.9524675 indicates a robust relationship between the two variables, which is rather surprising, considering the seemingly unrelated nature of finance commentary and educational administration. One might say that this correlation has left us in a state of "Levine's paradox," where the world of finance and the world of academia intersect in unexpected ways.

It seems that the interest in Matt Levine, whether driven by his astute financial commentary or his distinctive wit, is somehow entangled with the number of college administrators in the state of Ohio. This finding tickles the intellect and raises the question: are college administrators also surreptitiously following financial columns in their quest for administrative acumen, or perhaps contemplating a career switch from the ivy-covered halls to the bustling streets of Wall Street? One can't help but wonder if these administrators are in search of some financial "Levine"-ity in their professional lives.

Moving past the comedy of coincidences, the r-squared value of 0.9071943 further confirms the strength of the relationship between the variables. This robust level of explanation suggests that a significant portion of the variation in the number of college administrators in Ohio can be attributed to the fluctuations in Google searches for 'Matt Levine.' One might jest that this finding adds a new dimension to the term "administrative variability," emphasizing the impact of online interest in an unexpected domain.

The statistical significance with p < 0.01 lends further weight to our findings, reinforcing the notion that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. It appears that the allure of Matt Levine's financial insights extends beyond individual curiosity, potentially resonating with the professional landscape of college administration in Ohio. One might even say that the correlation is as strong as a well-structured financial portfolio, guiding our understanding of this unanticipated relationship with precision.

In conclusion, our results illuminate a peculiar yet undeniable link between Google searches for 'Matt Levine' and the number of college administrators in Ohio. This unlikely nexus between the financial realm and the academic domain invites further inquiry into the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate spheres. As we navigate through the labyrinth of statistical relationships, we cannot help but embrace the unexpected humor embedded within the fabric of our findings. This correlation presents a conundrum that defies conventional wisdom, urging us to ponder the intricacies of the statistical universe with a dash of levity and a sprinkle of charismatic "Levine"-ity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'matt levine' and The number of college administrators in Ohio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The (Non) Noble Nexus: Navigating the Nexus between Google Searches for 'Matt Levine' and The Number of college administrators in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the seemingly improbable and comical correlation between Google searches for the financial columnist 'Matt Levine' and the number of college administrators in Ohio. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to scrutinize this unlikely relationship. Surprisingly, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9524675 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022, indicating a remarkably strong positive association between the two variables. The findings suggest that the interest in Matt Levine, known for his wry observations on finance, could somehow be linked to the staffing levels of college administrators in the state of Ohio.

A dad joke, you ask? Why, certainly! It seems that "googling" the connection between Matt Levine and college administrators is no longer just a "search" for knowledge, but an unexpected journey into the wittily absurd.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith and Doe," the authors find a correlation between online search trends and various socio-economic indicators. Similarly, "Jones et al." elucidate the intricate patterns underlying online search behaviors and their unexpected connections to seemingly unrelated phenomena. However, the specific amalgamation of Google searches for 'Matt Levine' and the number of college administrators in Ohio has remained conspicuously absent from prior scholarly discourse.
Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Wealth of Nations" by Adam Smith and "Finance for Dummies" by Eric Tyson provide valuable insights into economic trends and financial analysis, albeit without delving into the peculiar nexus at hand. On the other hand, fiction works such as "The Devil Wears Prada" by Lauren Weisberger and "Good to Great" by Jim Collins hint at the intersection of business and academia, instigating a semblance of relevance, albeit tangential, to our investigation.
Venturing beyond traditional academic resources, the authors have meticulously surveyed an eclectic array of sources, including but not limited to self-help books, fortune cookies, and even grocery store receipts. In a bizarre turn of events, a particularly enlightening revelation emerged from a discarded CVS receipt, containing a cryptic message about the cosmic connection between finance enthusiasts and bureaucratic staffing levels.
Speaking of cosmic connections, why did the financial columnist refuse to play hide and seek? He always felt like he was too visible, much like the surprisingly conspicuous relationship between his online presence and the cadre of college administrators in Ohio!


[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between Google searches for 'Matt Levine' and the number of college administrators in Ohio. The correlation coefficient of 0.9524675 indicates a robust relationship between the two variables, which is rather surprising, considering the seemingly unrelated nature of finance commentary and educational administration. One might say that this correlation has left us in a state of "Levine's paradox," where the world of finance and the world of academia intersect in unexpected ways.
It seems that the interest in Matt Levine, whether driven by his astute financial commentary or his distinctive wit, is somehow entangled with the number of college administrators in the state of Ohio. This finding tickles the intellect and raises the question: are college administrators also surreptitiously following financial columns in their quest for administrative acumen, or perhaps contemplating a career switch from the ivy-covered halls to the bustling streets of Wall Street? One can't help but wonder if these administrators are in search of some financial "Levine"-ity in their professional lives.
Moving past the comedy of coincidences, the r-squared value of 0.9071943 further confirms the strength of the relationship between the variables. This robust level of explanation suggests that a significant portion of the variation in the number of college administrators in Ohio can be attributed to the fluctuations in Google searches for 'Matt Levine.' One might jest that this finding adds a new dimension to the term "administrative variability," emphasizing the impact of online interest in an unexpected domain.
The statistical significance with p < 0.01 lends further weight to our findings, reinforcing the notion that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. It appears that the allure of Matt Levine's financial insights extends beyond individual curiosity, potentially resonating with the professional landscape of college administration in Ohio. One might even say that the correlation is as strong as a well-structured financial portfolio, guiding our understanding of this unanticipated relationship with precision.
In conclusion, our results illuminate a peculiar yet undeniable link between Google searches for 'Matt Levine' and the number of college administrators in Ohio. This unlikely nexus between the financial realm and the academic domain invites further inquiry into the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate spheres. As we navigate through the labyrinth of statistical relationships, we cannot help but embrace the unexpected humor embedded within the fabric of our findings. This correlation presents a conundrum that defies conventional wisdom, urging us to ponder the intricacies of the statistical universe with a dash of levity and a sprinkle of charismatic "Levine"-ity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The robust positive correlation between Google searches for 'Matt Levine' and the number of college administrators in Ohio, as revealed in our study, evokes an amusing sense of wonder. The findings not only lent support to the prior research on the influence of online trends on socio-economic indicators but also unearthed a whimsical connection that tickles the intellect.

The unexpected nexus uncovered in our investigation reaffirms the work of Smith and Doe, who illuminated the profound impact of online search trends on various societal factors. However, while their exploration delved into conventional socio-economic variables, our study has extended this notion into the delightfully esoteric territory of financial commentary and educational administration. Perhaps this curious correlation can be humorously attributed to the enduring quest for actionable insights, prompting one to wonder if college administrators are also surreptitiously moonlighting as finance enthusiasts. It seems the allure of financial "Levine"-ity transcends traditional boundaries, blurring the lines between academia and astute financial analysis.

Building on the whimsical undertones of our literature review, our findings ingeniously underscore the hitherto unexplored cosmic thread that binds the world of finance with the administrative realm of Ohio's educational institutions. The statistical robustness of the correlation, with an r-squared value of 0.9071943, can be likened to the precision of a meticulously constructed financial model, guiding us through the maze of correlations with a wink and a nod. One might even jest that the statistical relationship is as notable as a well-diversified investment portfolio, providing a lighthearted yet insightful lens through which to view this peculiar association.

The significant p-value of < 0.01 further accentuates the unlikely nature of this correlation, dispelling any notion of it being a fortuitous occurrence. This statistical solidity adds a layer of comedic intrigue, akin to a plot twist in an enthralling tale of statistical exploration. It seems that the academic landscape of Ohio is not immune to the allure of financial musings, as evidenced by the synchronous dance between online searches for 'Matt Levine' and the staffing levels of college administrators.

In essence, our research uncovers a seemingly improbable, yet tantalizingly robust association between Google searches for 'Matt Levine' and the number of college administrators in Ohio. This whimsically unexpected nexus serves as a humorous reminder of the uncharted territories that await exploration within the realm of statistical relationships. As we navigate through the comical intricacies of this correlation, we are compelled to embrace the unanticipated with open arms, imparting a dash of levity to the scientific landscape and a sprinkle of charismatic "Levine"-ity to our scholarly discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'matt levine' and The number of college administrators in Ohio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The (Non) Noble Nexus: Navigating the Nexus between Google Searches for 'Matt Levine' and The Number of college administrators in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the seemingly improbable and comical correlation between Google searches for the financial columnist 'Matt Levine' and the number of college administrators in Ohio. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to scrutinize this unlikely relationship. Surprisingly, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9524675 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022, indicating a remarkably strong positive association between the two variables. The findings suggest that the interest in Matt Levine, known for his wry observations on finance, could somehow be linked to the staffing levels of college administrators in the state of Ohio.

A dad joke, you ask? Why, certainly! It seems that "googling" the connection between Matt Levine and college administrators is no longer just a "search" for knowledge, but an unexpected journey into the wittily absurd.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The quest for knowledge can sometimes lead to unexpected discoveries. In the realm of research, one may stumble upon correlations that seem unlikely, if not downright ludicrous. This paper delves into one such curious correlation, examining the perplexing connection between Google searches for the financial columnist, Matt Levine, and the number of college administrators in Ohio.
Before delving into the statistical intricacies, let us pause for a moment to appreciate the irony of this investigation. It seems the search for Matt Levine has extended beyond financial analysis and delved into the realm of educational administration. One might even say that these unexpected findings have turned our statistical journey into a "Matt-hematical" puzzle.
The notion of a causal link between an individual's online popularity and the number of college administrators in a specific state appears preposterous at first glance. However, in the realm of statistics, one must approach such correlations with a healthy dose of skepticism and an open mind. After all, as researchers, it is our duty to unravel the mysteries of the data, no matter how bizarre they may seem.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, let us not forget to maintain a sense of humor amidst the complexity of our statistical analyses. It appears that this foray into the nexus of finance and academia has turned our research into a "Levine" paradox of sorts, inviting us to reconsider the boundaries of statistical relationships and the interplay of seemingly unrelated variables.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between Google searches for 'Matt Levine' and the number of college administrators in Ohio. The correlation coefficient of 0.9524675 indicates a robust relationship between the two variables, which is rather surprising, considering the seemingly unrelated nature of finance commentary and educational administration. One might say that this correlation has left us in a state of "Levine's paradox," where the world of finance and the world of academia intersect in unexpected ways.
It seems that the interest in Matt Levine, whether driven by his astute financial commentary or his distinctive wit, is somehow entangled with the number of college administrators in the state of Ohio. This finding tickles the intellect and raises the question: are college administrators also surreptitiously following financial columns in their quest for administrative acumen, or perhaps contemplating a career switch from the ivy-covered halls to the bustling streets of Wall Street? One can't help but wonder if these administrators are in search of some financial "Levine"-ity in their professional lives.
Moving past the comedy of coincidences, the r-squared value of 0.9071943 further confirms the strength of the relationship between the variables. This robust level of explanation suggests that a significant portion of the variation in the number of college administrators in Ohio can be attributed to the fluctuations in Google searches for 'Matt Levine.' One might jest that this finding adds a new dimension to the term "administrative variability," emphasizing the impact of online interest in an unexpected domain.
The statistical significance with p < 0.01 lends further weight to our findings, reinforcing the notion that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. It appears that the allure of Matt Levine's financial insights extends beyond individual curiosity, potentially resonating with the professional landscape of college administration in Ohio. One might even say that the correlation is as strong as a well-structured financial portfolio, guiding our understanding of this unanticipated relationship with precision.
In conclusion, our results illuminate a peculiar yet undeniable link between Google searches for 'Matt Levine' and the number of college administrators in Ohio. This unlikely nexus between the financial realm and the academic domain invites further inquiry into the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate spheres. As we navigate through the labyrinth of statistical relationships, we cannot help but embrace the unexpected humor embedded within the fabric of our findings. This correlation presents a conundrum that defies conventional wisdom, urging us to ponder the intricacies of the statistical universe with a dash of levity and a sprinkle of charismatic "Levine"-ity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In light of our findings, it seems that the financial pundit, Matt Levine, exerts an inexplicable influence on the realm of college administration in Ohio. It appears that his wry observations on finance have transcended the digital sphere, infiltrating the professional landscape of academia with an unexpected resonance. One might jest that college administrators are not just 'googling' for financial wisdom, but also seeking a dose of "Levine"-ity to enhance their administrative prowess.

This statistical exploration has unraveled a curious correlation that defies conventional expectations, rendering our research a delightful "Levine" paradox -- a testament to the unforeseen interplay of seemingly unrelated variables. The robustness of the relationship, with an r-squared value of 0.9071943, underscores the depth of this connection, adding a touch of 'Levine'-ity to the realm of administrative variability.

It is evident that our statistical foray into this peculiar nexus has enriched our understanding of the interconnectedness of disparate disciplines, infusing it with a whimsical playfulness that defies the traditional rigidity of academic inquiry. Indeed, it seems that in the grand symphony of statistical relationships, the "Levine" note has found an unexpected harmonious cadence with the administrative tune in Ohio.

In light of these surreal yet statistically significant findings, one cannot help but be lured into the wittily absurd world of "Levine"-ity. It is with a hint of whimsy and a touch of academic earnestness that we assert: no further research in this field is needed, for the findings speak for themselves with a wink and a nod.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The (Non) Noble Nexus: Navigating the Nexus between Google Searches for 'Matt Levine' and The Number of college administrators in Ohio. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Interdisciplinary Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The (Non) Noble Nexus: Navigating the Nexus between Google Searches for 'Matt Levine' and The Number of college administrators in Ohio. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Digital Sociology and Higher Education Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The (Non) Noble Nexus: Navigating the Nexus between Google Searches for 'Matt Levine' and The Number of college administrators in Ohio with an abstract of This paper examines the seemingly improbable and comical correlation between Google searches for the financial columnist 'Matt Levine' and the number of college administrators in Ohio. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to scrutinize this unlikely relationship. Surprisingly, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9524675 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022, indicating a remarkably strong positive association between the two variables. The findings suggest that the interest in Matt Levine, known for his wry observations on finance, could somehow be linked to the staffing levels of college administrators in the state of Ohio.
A dad joke, you ask? Why, certainly! It seems that "googling" the connection between Matt Levine and college administrators is no longer just a "search" for knowledge, but an unexpected journey into the wittily absurd.

ChatGPT:

Google searches, Matt Levine, college administrators, Ohio, correlation, Google Trends, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, finance, staffing levels, relationship, wry observations, data analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Google searches for 'matt levine'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'matt levine' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'matt levine'

The number of college administrators in Ohio
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of education administrators, postsecondary in Ohio
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of college administrators in Ohio

Correlation r = 0.9524675 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9071943 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 90.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of college administrators in Ohio) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'matt levine') over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.3E-10. 0.0000000003338537043549016000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 3.3E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,995,323,961 random variables You don't actually need 2 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.88, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Google searches for 'matt levine' (Rel. search volume)19.598.8333313.416711.666710.2510.514.833321.916728.583337.333339.833336.583336.528.833326.416721.916723.833339.5
The number of college administrators in Ohio (Laborers)2930298026302480248024602870342042404950523053404790527047804610368042605830




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([19.5,9,8.83333,13.4167,11.6667,10.25,10.5,14.8333,21.9167,28.5833,37.3333,39.8333,36.5833,36.5,28.8333,26.4167,21.9167,23.8333,39.5,])
array_2 = np.array([2930,2980,2630,2480,2480,2460,2870,3420,4240,4950,5230,5340,4790,5270,4780,4610,3680,4260,5830,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'matt levine'"
array_2_name = "The number of college administrators in Ohio"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 5895 · Black Variable ID: 1488 · Red Variable ID: 12734
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0