about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,861 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of movies Robert Downey Jr. appeared in and the second variable is Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Indiana.  The chart goes from 1976 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As Robert Downey Jr.'s movie count rises, so does the magnetic charm encapsulated in every frame. This leads to an upsurge in overall positivity, creating a ripple effect on the viewers' political leanings. It's as if his on-screen presence acts as a catalyst for embracing liberal ideologies. Plus, who can resist a candidate when Iron Man himself seems to be endorsing them in a subliminal, cinematic manner? Remember, it's not just a Civil War on screen; it's a battle for electoral victory in the Hoosier State! So, perhaps there's a hidden superhero effect propelling those Democrat votes in Indiana. And as we all know, when it comes to politics, anything is possible, even a subtle Tony Stark influence in the heart of the Heartland.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a massive cinema screen with Robert Downey Jr.'s iconic smile accentuated by the glow of his various movie posters, creating an aura of warmth and charm. In the backdrop, portray a map of Indiana slowly filling with blue to represent the Democrat Presidential candidate gaining votes, symbolizing the influence of Downey's positive charm. The image should depict a whimsical connection between the actor's magnetic presence and a surge in support for the Democratic candidate in the Hoosier State. Ultimately, the image should evoke a sense of playful wonder and subtle political influence. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of movies Robert Downey Jr. appeared in and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Indiana. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a funny image you would see on reddit Charcoal An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Low poly Oragami
ChatGPT: a funny image you would see on reddit

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of movies Robert Downey Jr. appeared in and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Indiana, in the following situation: As Robert Downey Jr.'s movie count rises, so does the magnetic charm encapsulated in every frame. This leads to an upsurge in overall positivity, creating a ripple effect on the viewers' political leanings. It's as if his on-screen presence acts as a catalyst for embracing liberal ideologies. Plus, who can resist a candidate when Iron Man himself seems to be endorsing them in a subliminal, cinematic manner? Remember, it's not just a Civil War on screen; it's a battle for electoral victory in the Hoosier State! So, perhaps there's a hidden superhero effect propelling those Democrat votes in Indiana. And as we all know, when it comes to politics, anything is possible, even a subtle Tony Stark influence in the heart of the Heartland.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Picture Robert Downey Jr. on a big screen, surrounded by the glow of multiple movies he's starred in. With each additional film, his magnetic charm seems to intensify, creating an aura of positivity that stretches beyond the screen. In the background, a map of Indiana slowly fills with blue ballots, as the Democrat Presidential candidate gains votes. It's almost as if Iron Man's presence is gently influencing the political preferences of the viewers, contributing to a surge in support for the Democratic candidate in the Hoosier State.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] and depicting this scene: Picture Robert Downey Jr. on a big screen, surrounded by the glow of multiple movies he's starred in. With each additional film, his magnetic charm seems to intensify, creating an aura of positivity that stretches beyond the screen. In the background, a map of Indiana slowly fills with blue ballots, as the Democrat Presidential candidate gains votes. It's almost as if Iron Man's presence is gently influencing the political preferences of the viewers, contributing to a surge in support for the Democratic candidate in the Hoosier State. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a massive cinema screen with Robert Downey Jr.'s iconic smile accentuated by the glow of his various movie posters, creating an aura of warmth and charm. In the backdrop, portray a map of Indiana slowly filling with blue to represent the Democrat Presidential candidate gaining votes, symbolizing the influence of Downey's positive charm. The image should depict a whimsical connection between the actor's magnetic presence and a surge in support for the Democratic candidate in the Hoosier State. Ultimately, the image should evoke a sense of playful wonder and subtle political influence.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of movies Robert Downey Jr. appeared in caused Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Indiana to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Marvelous Movies and Mismatched Movements: Exploring the Relationship Between Robert Downey Jr.'s Screen Appearances and Democratic Votes in Indiana

The Journal of Cinematic Citizenship

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Robert Downey Jr. appeared in and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Indiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8705228 and p < 0.01 for 1976 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Marvelous Movies and Mismatched Movements: Exploring the Relationship Between Robert Downey Jr.'s Screen Appearances and Democratic Votes in Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between Hollywood and the heartland has long been a subject of fascination, with many pondering the impact of pop culture on political preference. In this study, we delved into the delightful and dynamic world of cinema and elections by examining the number of movies featuring the charismatic Robert Downey Jr. and its association with votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Indiana. Through a data-driven approach using The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we uncovered a statistical correlation that is as surprising as it is compelling. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8705228 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1976 to 2020, suggesting a striking relationship between the silver screen charm of Robert Downey Jr. and the political leanings of Hoosiers. While this research may raise eyebrows and elicit a few chuckles, it underscores the unexpected connections that can be unearthed when the worlds of entertainment and politics collide. As we continue to probe the quirky and curious intersections of culture and governance, our study serves as a light-hearted yet thought-provoking exploration of the strange and whimsical patterns that permeate our social fabric.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Robert Downey Jr. appeared in and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Indiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Marvelous Movies and Mismatched Movements: Exploring the Relationship Between Robert Downey Jr.'s Screen Appearances and Democratic Votes in Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between Hollywood and the heartland has long been a subject of fascination, with many pondering the impact of pop culture on political preference. In this study, we delved into the delightful and dynamic world of cinema and elections by examining the number of movies featuring the charismatic Robert Downey Jr. and its association with votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Indiana. Through a data-driven approach using The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we uncovered a statistical correlation that is as surprising as it is compelling. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8705228 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1976 to 2020, suggesting a striking relationship between the silver screen charm of Robert Downey Jr. and the political leanings of Hoosiers. While this research may raise eyebrows and elicit a few chuckles, it underscores the unexpected connections that can be unearthed when the worlds of entertainment and politics collide. As we continue to probe the quirky and curious intersections of culture and governance, our study serves as a light-hearted yet thought-provoking exploration of the strange and whimsical patterns that permeate our social fabric.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Lights, camera, politics! The interplay between entertainment and electoral outcomes has always been a source of fascination, often prompting us to wonder: do cultural icons wield influence beyond the silver screen? In the midst of this captivating conundrum, our study dives headfirst into the extravagant world of Hollywood to see if a certain suave superhuman's cinematic escapades have any bearing on the political preferences of Indiana voters. It's a wild and whimsical endeavor, but if the data sings to the tune of such an offbeat correlation, who are we to deny the magic of statistics and stardom?

We set out on this quest armed with databases, spreadsheets, and a zest for uncovering the unexpected. As we waded through The Movie DB and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we had to pinch ourselves at times—yes, we were indeed embarking on an exploration of the number of movies featuring the one and only Robert Downey Jr. and its curiously tangled relationship with the votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in the heartland of Indiana. And what did we find? Well, let's just say that the results were as eye-opening as finding a hidden gem in a bargain bin of DVDs.

While this study may seem like an amusing detour among the serious pursuits of data analysis, it holds a mirror up to the delightful peculiarities that define our social and cultural landscape. As we peer through this looking glass of statistical correlations and political proclivities, it's our hope that this research will not only entertain and spark a few knowing smiles but also provoke contemplation on the intricate web of influences that shape our electoral decisions. So, dear reader, it's time to unravel the riddle of how a dash of Hollywood glitz could potentially sway the political echelons of the Hoosier state. Let the projection of data-driven deductions and marvel at the marvelous movies of Robert Downey Jr. begin!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Robert Downey Jr. appeared in and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Indiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Marvelous Movies and Mismatched Movements: Exploring the Relationship Between Robert Downey Jr.'s Screen Appearances and Democratic Votes in Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between Hollywood and the heartland has long been a subject of fascination, with many pondering the impact of pop culture on political preference. In this study, we delved into the delightful and dynamic world of cinema and elections by examining the number of movies featuring the charismatic Robert Downey Jr. and its association with votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Indiana. Through a data-driven approach using The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we uncovered a statistical correlation that is as surprising as it is compelling. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8705228 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1976 to 2020, suggesting a striking relationship between the silver screen charm of Robert Downey Jr. and the political leanings of Hoosiers. While this research may raise eyebrows and elicit a few chuckles, it underscores the unexpected connections that can be unearthed when the worlds of entertainment and politics collide. As we continue to probe the quirky and curious intersections of culture and governance, our study serves as a light-hearted yet thought-provoking exploration of the strange and whimsical patterns that permeate our social fabric.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Lights, camera, politics! The interplay between entertainment and electoral outcomes has always been a source of fascination, often prompting us to wonder: do cultural icons wield influence beyond the silver screen? In the midst of this captivating conundrum, our study dives headfirst into the extravagant world of Hollywood to see if a certain suave superhuman's cinematic escapades have any bearing on the political preferences of Indiana voters. It's a wild and whimsical endeavor, but if the data sings to the tune of such an offbeat correlation, who are we to deny the magic of statistics and stardom?
We set out on this quest armed with databases, spreadsheets, and a zest for uncovering the unexpected. As we waded through The Movie DB and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we had to pinch ourselves at times—yes, we were indeed embarking on an exploration of the number of movies featuring the one and only Robert Downey Jr. and its curiously tangled relationship with the votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in the heartland of Indiana. And what did we find? Well, let's just say that the results were as eye-opening as finding a hidden gem in a bargain bin of DVDs.
While this study may seem like an amusing detour among the serious pursuits of data analysis, it holds a mirror up to the delightful peculiarities that define our social and cultural landscape. As we peer through this looking glass of statistical correlations and political proclivities, it's our hope that this research will not only entertain and spark a few knowing smiles but also provoke contemplation on the intricate web of influences that shape our electoral decisions. So, dear reader, it's time to unravel the riddle of how a dash of Hollywood glitz could potentially sway the political echelons of the Hoosier state. Let the projection of data-driven deductions and marvel at the marvelous movies of Robert Downey Jr. begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The interplay between Hollywood figures and political preferences has long been a subject of interest, with researchers delving into the curious connections between entertainment and electoral outcomes. Smith and Doe (2015) examined the impact of celebrity endorsements on political campaigns, shedding light on the potential influence of popular figures on voter behavior. Similarly, Jones (2018) explored the relationship between media exposure of public figures and public opinion, emphasizing the role of celebrity visibility in shaping political perceptions. These studies, while insightful, lay the groundwork for our offbeat inquiry into the peculiar partnership of Robert Downey Jr.'s screen appearances and Democratic votes in Indiana.

Shifting gears from the serious to the playful, our literature review takes an unexpected turn as we venture into the realm of non-fiction and fiction works that offer glimpses into the eccentric crossroads of pop culture and politics. "Entertainment and Elections: Modeling the Influence of Hollywood on Heartland Politics" (Smith, 2017) provides an analytical framework for understanding the nuanced interactions between entertainment industry trends and political leanings in Midwestern states. In a more unexpected twist, "The Avengers' Guide to Winning Elections" (Allen, 2019) hilariously explores the unlikely parallels between superhero dynamics and electoral strategies, offering a whimsical take on the potential influence of action-packed blockbusters on voting patterns. As we stretch the boundaries of conventional research territory, we draw inspiration from both serious analyses and lighthearted musings, acknowledging the colorful spectrum of perspectives that enrich our exploration.

In a surprising deviation from traditional academic sources, we turn our attention to fictional works that, though not rooted in empirical data, capture the imagination with their tangential relevance to our offbeat research topic. "The Political Ploys of Pepper Potts" (Stark, 2008) presents a tongue-in-cheek narrative that humorously intertwines political maneuvering and Hollywood gossip, playfully teasing the idea of celebrity influence on electoral dynamics. Taking a whimsical leap into the world of board games, "Votes and Ventures: The Monopoly of Marvel Edition" (Parker Brothers, 2020) playfully imagines a scenario where Marvel characters engage in political campaigning within the confines of a classic board game, offering a light-hearted yet thought-provoking exploration of the fictional intersections between entertainment and electoral machinations.

With this blended assortment of serious scholarship, playful scenarios, and fictional musings, our literature review sets the stage for a lighthearted yet rigorous investigation into the unexpected correlation between the silver screen allure of Robert Downey Jr. and the political inclinations of voters in Indiana. As we navigate the landscape of unconventional research inspirations, we invite the reader to join us in embracing the delightfully quirky and unpredictable dimensions of this scholarly escapade.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Robert Downey Jr. appeared in and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Indiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1976 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Marvelous Movies and Mismatched Movements: Exploring the Relationship Between Robert Downey Jr.'s Screen Appearances and Democratic Votes in Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between Hollywood and the heartland has long been a subject of fascination, with many pondering the impact of pop culture on political preference. In this study, we delved into the delightful and dynamic world of cinema and elections by examining the number of movies featuring the charismatic Robert Downey Jr. and its association with votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Indiana. Through a data-driven approach using The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we uncovered a statistical correlation that is as surprising as it is compelling. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8705228 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1976 to 2020, suggesting a striking relationship between the silver screen charm of Robert Downey Jr. and the political leanings of Hoosiers. While this research may raise eyebrows and elicit a few chuckles, it underscores the unexpected connections that can be unearthed when the worlds of entertainment and politics collide. As we continue to probe the quirky and curious intersections of culture and governance, our study serves as a light-hearted yet thought-provoking exploration of the strange and whimsical patterns that permeate our social fabric.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Lights, camera, politics! The interplay between entertainment and electoral outcomes has always been a source of fascination, often prompting us to wonder: do cultural icons wield influence beyond the silver screen? In the midst of this captivating conundrum, our study dives headfirst into the extravagant world of Hollywood to see if a certain suave superhuman's cinematic escapades have any bearing on the political preferences of Indiana voters. It's a wild and whimsical endeavor, but if the data sings to the tune of such an offbeat correlation, who are we to deny the magic of statistics and stardom?
We set out on this quest armed with databases, spreadsheets, and a zest for uncovering the unexpected. As we waded through The Movie DB and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we had to pinch ourselves at times—yes, we were indeed embarking on an exploration of the number of movies featuring the one and only Robert Downey Jr. and its curiously tangled relationship with the votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in the heartland of Indiana. And what did we find? Well, let's just say that the results were as eye-opening as finding a hidden gem in a bargain bin of DVDs.
While this study may seem like an amusing detour among the serious pursuits of data analysis, it holds a mirror up to the delightful peculiarities that define our social and cultural landscape. As we peer through this looking glass of statistical correlations and political proclivities, it's our hope that this research will not only entertain and spark a few knowing smiles but also provoke contemplation on the intricate web of influences that shape our electoral decisions. So, dear reader, it's time to unravel the riddle of how a dash of Hollywood glitz could potentially sway the political echelons of the Hoosier state. Let the projection of data-driven deductions and marvel at the marvelous movies of Robert Downey Jr. begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the peculiar connection between the silver screen charm of Robert Downey Jr. and the political predilections of the fine folks of Indiana, we embarked on a journey that was as complex as it was comical. Our research team scoured the digital expanse, traversing the realms of The Movie DB and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to gather the requisite data. And oh, what a merry dance it was to extract the numbers of Mr. Downey Jr.'s appearances and the Democratic votes in the Hoosier state!

Our methodology employed a delightful blend of good old-fashioned data scraping, statistical tomfoolery, and a touch of digital derring-do. We amalgamated data from 1976 to 2020, exploiting every nook and cranny of the internet to ensure that no stone was left unturned in our quest to stitch together the fabric of cinematic allure and political preference.

First, we gathered the number of movies in which the dashing Mr. Downey Jr. graced the screen, ensuring to include all his noteworthy appearances—be they daring superhero exploits or enigmatic detective escapades. Once we had this treasure trove of cinematic data at our fingertips, we took a jaunty jaunt over to the realms of political discourse, capturing the votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in the fabled land of Indiana.

The correlation between the two disparate yet strangely interconnected datasets was then examined using a series of statistical analysis tools—raising the spirits of quantitative analysis enthusiasts and eliciting the more elusive chuckles of correlation coefficient connoisseurs. Our results, which may be seen as more elusive than a well-camouflaged Easter egg, revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8705228 and p < 0.01, confirming a startling relationship between the cinematic endeavors of Mr. Downey Jr. and the political leanings of the Hoosier state.

While our methodology may draw a few quizzical looks and raise an eyebrow or two, it encapsulates the playful yet purposeful nature of our investigation into the unexpected nexus of Hollywood glitz and political sway. With this methodology in our toolbox, we set out to engage in a lighthearted yet rigorously analytical examination of the whimsical patterns that populate our social tapestry. So, off we went, armed with spreadsheets, data scrapers, and an unyielding resolve to uncover the enigmatic ties that bind Tinseltown and the ballot box. And uncover them we did, dear reader, one goofy grin and statistical sleight of hand at a time!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Robert Downey Jr. appeared in and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Indiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1976 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8705228, r-squared of 0.7578100, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Marvelous Movies and Mismatched Movements: Exploring the Relationship Between Robert Downey Jr.'s Screen Appearances and Democratic Votes in Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between Hollywood and the heartland has long been a subject of fascination, with many pondering the impact of pop culture on political preference. In this study, we delved into the delightful and dynamic world of cinema and elections by examining the number of movies featuring the charismatic Robert Downey Jr. and its association with votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Indiana. Through a data-driven approach using The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we uncovered a statistical correlation that is as surprising as it is compelling. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8705228 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1976 to 2020, suggesting a striking relationship between the silver screen charm of Robert Downey Jr. and the political leanings of Hoosiers. While this research may raise eyebrows and elicit a few chuckles, it underscores the unexpected connections that can be unearthed when the worlds of entertainment and politics collide. As we continue to probe the quirky and curious intersections of culture and governance, our study serves as a light-hearted yet thought-provoking exploration of the strange and whimsical patterns that permeate our social fabric.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Lights, camera, politics! The interplay between entertainment and electoral outcomes has always been a source of fascination, often prompting us to wonder: do cultural icons wield influence beyond the silver screen? In the midst of this captivating conundrum, our study dives headfirst into the extravagant world of Hollywood to see if a certain suave superhuman's cinematic escapades have any bearing on the political preferences of Indiana voters. It's a wild and whimsical endeavor, but if the data sings to the tune of such an offbeat correlation, who are we to deny the magic of statistics and stardom?
We set out on this quest armed with databases, spreadsheets, and a zest for uncovering the unexpected. As we waded through The Movie DB and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we had to pinch ourselves at times—yes, we were indeed embarking on an exploration of the number of movies featuring the one and only Robert Downey Jr. and its curiously tangled relationship with the votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in the heartland of Indiana. And what did we find? Well, let's just say that the results were as eye-opening as finding a hidden gem in a bargain bin of DVDs.
While this study may seem like an amusing detour among the serious pursuits of data analysis, it holds a mirror up to the delightful peculiarities that define our social and cultural landscape. As we peer through this looking glass of statistical correlations and political proclivities, it's our hope that this research will not only entertain and spark a few knowing smiles but also provoke contemplation on the intricate web of influences that shape our electoral decisions. So, dear reader, it's time to unravel the riddle of how a dash of Hollywood glitz could potentially sway the political echelons of the Hoosier state. Let the projection of data-driven deductions and marvel at the marvelous movies of Robert Downey Jr. begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the relationship between the number of movies featuring Robert Downey Jr. and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Indiana from 1976 to 2020 left us marveling at the unexpected connection we uncovered. We found a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8705228, indicating a robust positive relationship between the two variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.7578100, signifying that approximately 76% of the variation in Democratic votes in Indiana can be explained by the number of movies Robert Downey Jr. appeared in.

In the realm of statistical significance, our findings were nothing short of phenomenal, with a p-value of < 0.01, solidifying the credibility and relevance of our results. The high degree of correlation and statistical significance provided compelling evidence of the association between the Hollywood presence of Robert Downey Jr. and the political leanings of the constituents in the Hoosier state.

The 1976-2020 time frame encompassed a diverse array of political and cinematic milestones, and the observational data we gleaned from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse revealed a striking dance between the silver screen charisma of Robert Downey Jr. and the electoral tendencies of Indiana voters.

Furthermore, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) depicting the relationship between the number of movies featuring Robert Downey Jr. and Democratic votes presents a compelling and visually striking portrayal of the strong positive correlation we observed.

These findings, though somewhat unexpected, draw attention to the intriguing and intricate dynamics that underlie the intersections of entertainment and politics. It's a testament to the enigmatic and entertaining nature of the social fabric that encapsulates our societal choices and preferences. While this correlation may appear peculiar at first glance, it beckons further exploration into the myriad influences that shape our political landscape, prompting both serious contemplation and a few lighthearted smiles along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Robert Downey Jr. appeared in and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Indiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Marvelous Movies and Mismatched Movements: Exploring the Relationship Between Robert Downey Jr.'s Screen Appearances and Democratic Votes in Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between Hollywood and the heartland has long been a subject of fascination, with many pondering the impact of pop culture on political preference. In this study, we delved into the delightful and dynamic world of cinema and elections by examining the number of movies featuring the charismatic Robert Downey Jr. and its association with votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Indiana. Through a data-driven approach using The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we uncovered a statistical correlation that is as surprising as it is compelling. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8705228 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1976 to 2020, suggesting a striking relationship between the silver screen charm of Robert Downey Jr. and the political leanings of Hoosiers. While this research may raise eyebrows and elicit a few chuckles, it underscores the unexpected connections that can be unearthed when the worlds of entertainment and politics collide. As we continue to probe the quirky and curious intersections of culture and governance, our study serves as a light-hearted yet thought-provoking exploration of the strange and whimsical patterns that permeate our social fabric.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The interplay between Hollywood figures and political preferences has long been a subject of interest, with researchers delving into the curious connections between entertainment and electoral outcomes. Smith and Doe (2015) examined the impact of celebrity endorsements on political campaigns, shedding light on the potential influence of popular figures on voter behavior. Similarly, Jones (2018) explored the relationship between media exposure of public figures and public opinion, emphasizing the role of celebrity visibility in shaping political perceptions. These studies, while insightful, lay the groundwork for our offbeat inquiry into the peculiar partnership of Robert Downey Jr.'s screen appearances and Democratic votes in Indiana.
Shifting gears from the serious to the playful, our literature review takes an unexpected turn as we venture into the realm of non-fiction and fiction works that offer glimpses into the eccentric crossroads of pop culture and politics. "Entertainment and Elections: Modeling the Influence of Hollywood on Heartland Politics" (Smith, 2017) provides an analytical framework for understanding the nuanced interactions between entertainment industry trends and political leanings in Midwestern states. In a more unexpected twist, "The Avengers' Guide to Winning Elections" (Allen, 2019) hilariously explores the unlikely parallels between superhero dynamics and electoral strategies, offering a whimsical take on the potential influence of action-packed blockbusters on voting patterns. As we stretch the boundaries of conventional research territory, we draw inspiration from both serious analyses and lighthearted musings, acknowledging the colorful spectrum of perspectives that enrich our exploration.
In a surprising deviation from traditional academic sources, we turn our attention to fictional works that, though not rooted in empirical data, capture the imagination with their tangential relevance to our offbeat research topic. "The Political Ploys of Pepper Potts" (Stark, 2008) presents a tongue-in-cheek narrative that humorously intertwines political maneuvering and Hollywood gossip, playfully teasing the idea of celebrity influence on electoral dynamics. Taking a whimsical leap into the world of board games, "Votes and Ventures: The Monopoly of Marvel Edition" (Parker Brothers, 2020) playfully imagines a scenario where Marvel characters engage in political campaigning within the confines of a classic board game, offering a light-hearted yet thought-provoking exploration of the fictional intersections between entertainment and electoral machinations.
With this blended assortment of serious scholarship, playful scenarios, and fictional musings, our literature review sets the stage for a lighthearted yet rigorous investigation into the unexpected correlation between the silver screen allure of Robert Downey Jr. and the political inclinations of voters in Indiana. As we navigate the landscape of unconventional research inspirations, we invite the reader to join us in embracing the delightfully quirky and unpredictable dimensions of this scholarly escapade.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the relationship between the number of movies featuring Robert Downey Jr. and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Indiana from 1976 to 2020 left us marveling at the unexpected connection we uncovered. We found a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8705228, indicating a robust positive relationship between the two variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.7578100, signifying that approximately 76% of the variation in Democratic votes in Indiana can be explained by the number of movies Robert Downey Jr. appeared in.
In the realm of statistical significance, our findings were nothing short of phenomenal, with a p-value of < 0.01, solidifying the credibility and relevance of our results. The high degree of correlation and statistical significance provided compelling evidence of the association between the Hollywood presence of Robert Downey Jr. and the political leanings of the constituents in the Hoosier state.
The 1976-2020 time frame encompassed a diverse array of political and cinematic milestones, and the observational data we gleaned from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse revealed a striking dance between the silver screen charisma of Robert Downey Jr. and the electoral tendencies of Indiana voters.
Furthermore, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) depicting the relationship between the number of movies featuring Robert Downey Jr. and Democratic votes presents a compelling and visually striking portrayal of the strong positive correlation we observed.
These findings, though somewhat unexpected, draw attention to the intriguing and intricate dynamics that underlie the intersections of entertainment and politics. It's a testament to the enigmatic and entertaining nature of the social fabric that encapsulates our societal choices and preferences. While this correlation may appear peculiar at first glance, it beckons further exploration into the myriad influences that shape our political landscape, prompting both serious contemplation and a few lighthearted smiles along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have propelled the intersection of Hollywood and heartland politics into the limelight, shining a spotlight on the curious correlation between the number of movies featuring Robert Downey Jr. and Democratic votes in Indiana. While some might regard our study as a flight of whimsy, the results underscore the unexpected yet robust relationship that exists between the silver screen magnetism of Robert Downey Jr. and the political leanings of Hoosiers.

Building upon the scholarly musings of Smith and Doe (2015) and Jones (2018), who explored the impact of celebrity endorsements and media visibility on voter behavior, our research supports the notion that popular figures from the entertainment industry can indeed sway political preferences. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8705228 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, our study substantiates the contention that the presence of a beloved Hollywood personality such as Robert Downey Jr. can impact electoral outcomes – a conclusion that may have left some skeptics Stark(raving) mad.

Drawing from the literature review's playful twists, let's take a moment to savor the irony that our serious examination of real-world data has mirrored the unexpected insights offered by fictional narratives. "The Political Ploys of Pepper Potts" (Stark, 2008), once considered a whimsical departure from academic discourse, now resonates with an unexpected ring of truth. Perhaps we can turn to the "Avengers' Guide to Winning Elections" (Allen, 2019) for a few unconventional campaign strategies, given their apparent resonance with the voting public.

In considering the broader implications of our findings, our study highlights the multifaceted and often unpredictable nature of the public psyche. Whether through genuine admiration for Robert Downey Jr.'s screen presence or a shared affinity for his on-screen personas, Hoosiers have seemingly signaled their support through the ballot box, embracing the charming, charismatic, and occasionally ironclad character traits that have shaped both Downey's roles and their electoral preferences.

As we continue to unravel the interplay between entertainment and politics, our study serves as a testament to the serendipitous and mystifying threads that weave through our societal fabric. So let's raise a cinematic toast to the delightful and enigmatic dance of data, casting a wry smile at the unexpected connections that fuel our society's quirks and quirks its choices. After all, in the colorful tapestry of life, sometimes truth can be stranger than fiction!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Robert Downey Jr. appeared in and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Indiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Marvelous Movies and Mismatched Movements: Exploring the Relationship Between Robert Downey Jr.'s Screen Appearances and Democratic Votes in Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between Hollywood and the heartland has long been a subject of fascination, with many pondering the impact of pop culture on political preference. In this study, we delved into the delightful and dynamic world of cinema and elections by examining the number of movies featuring the charismatic Robert Downey Jr. and its association with votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Indiana. Through a data-driven approach using The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we uncovered a statistical correlation that is as surprising as it is compelling. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8705228 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1976 to 2020, suggesting a striking relationship between the silver screen charm of Robert Downey Jr. and the political leanings of Hoosiers. While this research may raise eyebrows and elicit a few chuckles, it underscores the unexpected connections that can be unearthed when the worlds of entertainment and politics collide. As we continue to probe the quirky and curious intersections of culture and governance, our study serves as a light-hearted yet thought-provoking exploration of the strange and whimsical patterns that permeate our social fabric.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Lights, camera, politics! The interplay between entertainment and electoral outcomes has always been a source of fascination, often prompting us to wonder: do cultural icons wield influence beyond the silver screen? In the midst of this captivating conundrum, our study dives headfirst into the extravagant world of Hollywood to see if a certain suave superhuman's cinematic escapades have any bearing on the political preferences of Indiana voters. It's a wild and whimsical endeavor, but if the data sings to the tune of such an offbeat correlation, who are we to deny the magic of statistics and stardom?
We set out on this quest armed with databases, spreadsheets, and a zest for uncovering the unexpected. As we waded through The Movie DB and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we had to pinch ourselves at times—yes, we were indeed embarking on an exploration of the number of movies featuring the one and only Robert Downey Jr. and its curiously tangled relationship with the votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in the heartland of Indiana. And what did we find? Well, let's just say that the results were as eye-opening as finding a hidden gem in a bargain bin of DVDs.
While this study may seem like an amusing detour among the serious pursuits of data analysis, it holds a mirror up to the delightful peculiarities that define our social and cultural landscape. As we peer through this looking glass of statistical correlations and political proclivities, it's our hope that this research will not only entertain and spark a few knowing smiles but also provoke contemplation on the intricate web of influences that shape our electoral decisions. So, dear reader, it's time to unravel the riddle of how a dash of Hollywood glitz could potentially sway the political echelons of the Hoosier state. Let the projection of data-driven deductions and marvel at the marvelous movies of Robert Downey Jr. begin!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the relationship between the number of movies featuring Robert Downey Jr. and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Indiana from 1976 to 2020 left us marveling at the unexpected connection we uncovered. We found a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8705228, indicating a robust positive relationship between the two variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.7578100, signifying that approximately 76% of the variation in Democratic votes in Indiana can be explained by the number of movies Robert Downey Jr. appeared in.
In the realm of statistical significance, our findings were nothing short of phenomenal, with a p-value of < 0.01, solidifying the credibility and relevance of our results. The high degree of correlation and statistical significance provided compelling evidence of the association between the Hollywood presence of Robert Downey Jr. and the political leanings of the constituents in the Hoosier state.
The 1976-2020 time frame encompassed a diverse array of political and cinematic milestones, and the observational data we gleaned from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse revealed a striking dance between the silver screen charisma of Robert Downey Jr. and the electoral tendencies of Indiana voters.
Furthermore, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) depicting the relationship between the number of movies featuring Robert Downey Jr. and Democratic votes presents a compelling and visually striking portrayal of the strong positive correlation we observed.
These findings, though somewhat unexpected, draw attention to the intriguing and intricate dynamics that underlie the intersections of entertainment and politics. It's a testament to the enigmatic and entertaining nature of the social fabric that encapsulates our societal choices and preferences. While this correlation may appear peculiar at first glance, it beckons further exploration into the myriad influences that shape our political landscape, prompting both serious contemplation and a few lighthearted smiles along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our whimsical quest into the realm of Hollywood and politics has left us pleasantly surprised by the robust and statistically significant correlation between the number of movies featuring the dashing Robert Downey Jr. and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Indiana. Who would have thought that Iron Man's silver screen escapades could potentially sway the political inclinations of Hoosiers? The intricate dance between these seemingly disparate arenas has unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.8705228, highlighting a connection as compelling as a box office hit.

From the humble abode of The Movie DB to the hallowed halls of the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our data-driven odyssey led us to uncover this unexpected relationship, leaving us in awe of the enigmatic threads that weave through the fabric of society. As we stand at the intersection of entertainment and governance, our findings urge a lighthearted yet thoughtful reflection on the peculiar influences that shape electoral decisions, reminding us that even the most unlikely factors can wield unforeseen sway.

In the grand theater of scholarly pursuits, our study may seem like an amusing interlude among weightier topics, but it implores us to acknowledge the unpredictable and peculiar forces that underpin our socio-political landscape. Ultimately, our analysis of the Hollywood charm of Robert Downey Jr. and its unlikely connection to Democratic votes in Indiana serves as a delightful reminder that the tapestry of societal influences is woven with threads of the unexpected.

Therefore, with our tongues firmly in our cheeks and a newfound appreciation for the whimsy of statistical correlations, we assert that further research in this area is about as necessary as a villain's monologue in a superhero movie – in other words, it's not needed!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Marvelous Movies and Mismatched Movements: Exploring the Relationship Between Robert Downey Jr.'s Screen Appearances and Democratic Votes in Indiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Cinematic Citizenship


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Marvelous Movies and Mismatched Movements: Exploring the Relationship Between Robert Downey Jr.'s Screen Appearances and Democratic Votes in Indiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Cinematic Politics and Public Opinion


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Marvelous Movies and Mismatched Movements: Exploring the Relationship Between Robert Downey Jr.'s Screen Appearances and Democratic Votes in Indiana with an abstract of The connection between Hollywood and the heartland has long been a subject of fascination, with many pondering the impact of pop culture on political preference. In this study, we delved into the delightful and dynamic world of cinema and elections by examining the number of movies featuring the charismatic Robert Downey Jr. and its association with votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Indiana. Through a data-driven approach using The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we uncovered a statistical correlation that is as surprising as it is compelling. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8705228 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1976 to 2020, suggesting a striking relationship between the silver screen charm of Robert Downey Jr. and the political leanings of Hoosiers. While this research may raise eyebrows and elicit a few chuckles, it underscores the unexpected connections that can be unearthed when the worlds of entertainment and politics collide. As we continue to probe the quirky and curious intersections of culture and governance, our study serves as a light-hearted yet thought-provoking exploration of the strange and whimsical patterns that permeate our social fabric.

ChatGPT:

Robert Downey Jr. movies, Democratic votes in Indiana, Hollywood and political preference, impact of pop culture on political preference, cinema and elections, Robert Downey Jr. filmography, movie database, election data analysis, correlation between movie stars and political leanings, entertainment and politics, cultural impact on governance

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of movies Robert Downey Jr. appeared in
Source: The Movie DB
Additional Info: Iron Man (2008); Chaplin (1992); Sherlock Holmes (2009); Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (2005); The Singing Detective (2003); The Avengers (2012); Heart and Souls (1993); Two Girls and a Guy (1997); Restoration (1995); Due Date (2010); Black and White (1999); The Soloist (2009); 1969 (1988); Iron Man 3 (2013); Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows (2011); The Judge (2014); The Route V50 (2004); Mr. Willowby's Christmas Tree (1995); Marvel Studios: Assembling a Universe (2014); Avengers: Infinity War (2018); The Last Party (1993); I Am Steve McQueen (2014); Iron Man 2 (2010); Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015); Lethargy (2002); Dolittle (2020); I Am Iron Man (2008); Pieta (2001); Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson: A Perfect Chemistry (2012); Sherlock Holmes: Reinvented (2010); Avengers: Endgame (2019); Phase 2 Tag Scenes: A Making of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Phase Two (2015); Equilibrium (2004); Ultimate Iron Man: The Making of Iron Man 2 (2010); The Age of A.I (2019); Downey's Dream Cars (2022); Chances Are (1989); A Scanner Darkly (2006); Johnny Be Good (1988); Gothika (2003); Air America (1990); True Believer (1989); Charlie Bartlett (2008); Home for the Holidays (1995); Only You (1994); The Pick-up Artist (1987); Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus (2006); Game 6 (2006); Too Much Sun (1990); Whatever We Do (2003); The Outsider (2005); Danger Zone (1996); Starz Inside: Comic Books Unbound (2008); Captain America: Civil War (2016); Building the Dream: Assembling the Avengers (2012); Tropic Thunder (2008); Mad Mel: The Rise and Fall of a Hollywood Icon (2010); Arrival (1986); Sr. (2022); Natural Born Killers (1994); U.S. Marshals (1998); A Guide to Recognizing Your Saints (2006); Soapdish (1991); The Gingerbread Man (1998); Less Than Zero (1987); Tropic Thunder: Rain of Madness (2008); Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017); Zodiac (2007); Wonder Boys (2000); Richard III (1995); In Dreams (1999); Marvel One-Shot: The Consultant (2011); Two Tons of Turquoise to Taos Tonight (1975); Eros (2004); Oppenheimer (2023); The Shaggy Dog (2006); Good Night, and Good Luck. (2005); Hugo Pool (1997); One Night Stand (1997); Back to School (1986); Hail Caesar (1994); Rented Lips (1987); Inside Christopher Nolan's Oppenheimer (2023); Lucky You (2007); Firstborn (1984); Hubert Selby Jr: It/ll Be Better Tomorrow (2006); One Summer in Austin: The Story of Filming 'A Scanner Darkly' (2006); Tuff Turf (1985); Friends & Lovers (1999); Weird Science (1985); Luck, Trust & Ketchup: Robert Altman in Carver Country (1993); A Fan's Guide to Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017); The Story Of Our Time: The Making Of Oppenheimer (2023); That's Adequate (1989); Bowfinger (1999); Up the Academy (1980); Chef (2014); Voom Portraits (2007); MoPOP Founders Award 2020 Honoring Alice in Chains (2020); Dear America: Letters Home from Vietnam (1987); Charlie: The Life and Art of Charles Chaplin (2003); Killers Kill, Dead Men Die (2007); Short Cuts (1993); Animal House: The Inside Story (2008); America (1986); A Century of Cinema (1994); Girls Just Want to Have Fun (1985); Marvel: 75 Years, from Pulp to Pop! (2014); Val (2021); Fertile La Toyah Video Magazine #2: The Kinky Issue! (1994); Baby It's You (1983); Celebrating Marvel's Stan Lee (2019); 2022 Rock & Roll Hall of Fame Induction Ceremony (2022); Chadwick Boseman: A Tribute for a King (2020); Love and Distrust (2010); Annie Leibovitz: Life Through a Lens (2007); The Nice Guys (2016); The Incredible Hulk (2008); Never Sleep Again: The Elm Street Legacy (2010)

See what else correlates with The number of movies Robert Downey Jr. appeared in

Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Indiana
Detailed data title: Total votes cast for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Indiana
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Indiana

Correlation r = 0.8705228 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7578100 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 75.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Indiana) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of movies Robert Downey Jr. appeared in) over the 11 years from 1976 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00049. 0.0004895134102116410000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 0.049% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,043 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.57, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19801984198819921996200020042008201220162020
The number of movies Robert Downey Jr. appeared in (Movie appearances)11211138323
Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Indiana (Total votes)8441978414818606438484208874249019809690111374040115289010331301242420




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
  5. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1,1,2,1,1,1,3,8,3,2,3,])
array_2 = np.array([844197,841481,860643,848420,887424,901980,969011,1374040,1152890,1033130,1242420,])
array_1_name = "The number of movies Robert Downey Jr. appeared in"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Indiana"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 5861 · Black Variable ID: 26629 · Red Variable ID: 25975
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0