about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,793 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are and the second variable is The number of amusement park attendants in Delaware.  The chart goes from 2015 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of amusement park attendants in Delaware increases, so does the level of expertise in operating the space-themed rides. This expertise inadvertently seeps into the local community, leading to a surge in deep space knowledge and a profound interest in astrophysics. This, in turn, prompts the production team at PBS Space Time to elevate the professionalism of their video titles to match the rising space IQ of the general populace. The result is a delightful fusion of cosmic amusement and intellectual enlightenment, creating a new era of astrophysical understanding disguised as mere theme park frivolity. The universe works in mysterious ways, indeed.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a bustling amusement park in Delaware, with a focus on a group of park-goers gathered around a screen showing a PBS Space Time video. The screen's title reflects the surging interest in deep space knowledge, creating a fusion of cosmic amusement and intellectual enlightenment amidst the theme park frivolity. The Polaroid should capture the excitement and laughter of the park-goers, as well as the vibrant atmosphere of the amusement park. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are and The number of amusement park attendants in Delaware. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Magic realism Woodblock painting Oragami a Polaroid photo Data cyber art
ChatGPT: a Polaroid photo

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are and The number of amusement park attendants in Delaware, in the following situation: As the number of amusement park attendants in Delaware increases, so does the level of expertise in operating the space-themed rides. This expertise inadvertently seeps into the local community, leading to a surge in deep space knowledge and a profound interest in astrophysics. This, in turn, prompts the production team at PBS Space Time to elevate the professionalism of their video titles to match the rising space IQ of the general populace. The result is a delightful fusion of cosmic amusement and intellectual enlightenment, creating a new era of astrophysical understanding disguised as mere theme park frivolity. The universe works in mysterious ways, indeed.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling amusement park in Delaware, the number of attendants steadily increases as the level of expertise in operating space-themed rides grows. Amidst the laughter and excitement, a group of park-goers gather around a screen showing a PBS Space Time video. The video title, now exuding a professional air, reflects the surging interest in deep space knowledge. The fusion of cosmic amusement and intellectual enlightenment is evident, creating a new era of astrophysical understanding amidst the theme park frivolity.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a Polaroid photo ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling amusement park in Delaware, the number of attendants steadily increases as the level of expertise in operating space-themed rides grows. Amidst the laughter and excitement, a group of park-goers gather around a screen showing a PBS Space Time video. The video title, now exuding a professional air, reflects the surging interest in deep space knowledge. The fusion of cosmic amusement and intellectual enlightenment is evident, creating a new era of astrophysical understanding amidst the theme park frivolity. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a bustling amusement park in Delaware, with a focus on a group of park-goers gathered around a screen showing a PBS Space Time video. The screen's title reflects the surging interest in deep space knowledge, creating a fusion of cosmic amusement and intellectual enlightenment amidst the theme park frivolity. The Polaroid should capture the excitement and laughter of the park-goers, as well as the vibrant atmosphere of the amusement park.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in How professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are caused The number of amusement park attendants in Delaware to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Quantum Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between PBS Space Time YouTube Video Titles and Amusement Park Attendance in Delaware

The Journal of Amusement Park Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are and The number of amusement park attendants in Delaware. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8563760 and p < 0.01 for 2015 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Quantum Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between PBS Space Time YouTube Video Titles and Amusement Park Attendance in Delaware

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious correlation between the seemingly unrelated realms of professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the fluctuating attendance numbers at amusement parks in the state of Delaware. Using a combination of AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a whimsical journey to investigate this perplexing connection. The findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8563760 and p < 0.01 for the years 2015 to 2022, shedding light on the quantum implications of how video titles may influence the whimsical world of amusement park attendance. This paper not only unlocks a novel area of interdisciplinary research but also serves as a testament to the surprising serendipities that emerge when delving into the world of seemingly disparate phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are and The number of amusement park attendants in Delaware. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Quantum Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between PBS Space Time YouTube Video Titles and Amusement Park Attendance in Delaware

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious correlation between the seemingly unrelated realms of professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the fluctuating attendance numbers at amusement parks in the state of Delaware. Using a combination of AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a whimsical journey to investigate this perplexing connection. The findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8563760 and p < 0.01 for the years 2015 to 2022, shedding light on the quantum implications of how video titles may influence the whimsical world of amusement park attendance. This paper not only unlocks a novel area of interdisciplinary research but also serves as a testament to the surprising serendipities that emerge when delving into the world of seemingly disparate phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The arcane realms of PBS Space Time videos and amusement park attendance may seem as distant as the far reaches of the cosmos, but this study unearths a quantum connection that defies conventional wisdom. While one could argue that the relationship between the two is as inexplicable as dark matter, our research team dove headfirst into this enigmatic conundrum, navigating the nebulous corridors of professional-sounding video titles and the whimsical ebb and flow of amusement park crowds.

The genesis of this research was imbued with a sense of whimsy, prompting us to ponder the peculiar relationship between the captivating allure of astrophysical explorations and the magnetic pull of roller coasters and funnel cakes. The juxtaposition of these seemingly incongruent entities compelled us to embark on a journey that was equal parts exhilarating and confounding.

At the outset, the sheer juxtaposition of space-time explorations and amusement park merriment evoked a sense of absurdity that pervaded our scholarly pursuits. However, beneath the surface of this odd juxtaposition lay a tapestry of statistical intrigue and speculative musings, with the formless void of uncertainty giving way to the reliable constellations of empirical data.

The enigmatic dance between PBS Space Time video titles and the annual wave of amusement park goers in Delaware beckoned us toward uncharted territories of interdisciplinary inquiry. We were impelled to unravel this unlikely fusion, akin to unraveling the fabric of space-time itself, and bring forth a unifying theory that resonates in the expanse of both intellectual curiosity and recreational indulgence.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are and The number of amusement park attendants in Delaware. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Quantum Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between PBS Space Time YouTube Video Titles and Amusement Park Attendance in Delaware

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious correlation between the seemingly unrelated realms of professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the fluctuating attendance numbers at amusement parks in the state of Delaware. Using a combination of AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a whimsical journey to investigate this perplexing connection. The findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8563760 and p < 0.01 for the years 2015 to 2022, shedding light on the quantum implications of how video titles may influence the whimsical world of amusement park attendance. This paper not only unlocks a novel area of interdisciplinary research but also serves as a testament to the surprising serendipities that emerge when delving into the world of seemingly disparate phenomena.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The arcane realms of PBS Space Time videos and amusement park attendance may seem as distant as the far reaches of the cosmos, but this study unearths a quantum connection that defies conventional wisdom. While one could argue that the relationship between the two is as inexplicable as dark matter, our research team dove headfirst into this enigmatic conundrum, navigating the nebulous corridors of professional-sounding video titles and the whimsical ebb and flow of amusement park crowds.
The genesis of this research was imbued with a sense of whimsy, prompting us to ponder the peculiar relationship between the captivating allure of astrophysical explorations and the magnetic pull of roller coasters and funnel cakes. The juxtaposition of these seemingly incongruent entities compelled us to embark on a journey that was equal parts exhilarating and confounding.
At the outset, the sheer juxtaposition of space-time explorations and amusement park merriment evoked a sense of absurdity that pervaded our scholarly pursuits. However, beneath the surface of this odd juxtaposition lay a tapestry of statistical intrigue and speculative musings, with the formless void of uncertainty giving way to the reliable constellations of empirical data.
The enigmatic dance between PBS Space Time video titles and the annual wave of amusement park goers in Delaware beckoned us toward uncharted territories of interdisciplinary inquiry. We were impelled to unravel this unlikely fusion, akin to unraveling the fabric of space-time itself, and bring forth a unifying theory that resonates in the expanse of both intellectual curiosity and recreational indulgence.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their groundbreaking work, Smith et al. (2020) unearthed the nuanced relationship between professional-sounding YouTube video titles and their impact on viewer engagement. The authors find that a meticulously crafted video title can serve as the gravitational force that draws curious minds into the enigmatic cosmos of astrophysical phenomena. While their study primarily focuses on online engagement metrics, the implications of their findings resonate deep within the unexplored corridors of amusement park attendance dynamics.

Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the heart of amusement park economics, unraveling the intricate interplay of consumer spending, seasonal trends, and the alluring appeal of thrill rides. Their analysis reveals the mercurial nature of amusement park attendance, which ebbs and flows like the tides of an unpredictable cosmic expanse.

Turning to related non-fiction literature, "Astrophysics for People in a Hurry" by Neil deGrasse Tyson contemplates the mysteries of the universe in a way that mirrors the curious allure of amusement park adventures. Similarly, "Roller Coaster: Wooden and Steel Coasters, Twisters and Corkscrews" by Robert Cartmell invites readers to ponder the exhilarating thrills of roller coasters, much like the captivating pull of PBS Space Time videos.

On a more speculative note, the works of fiction such as "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams and "Ready Player One" by Ernest Cline weave imaginative narratives that evoke the whimsical juxtaposition of cosmic escapades and recreational escapism. These literary escapades echo the perplexing fusion that our research seeks to illuminate.

Notably, internet memes such as the "This is Fine" dog and the "Infinite Jest" references resonate with the themes of perplexing connections and enigmatic juxtapositions, serving as playful reminders of the uncanny interplay between seemingly disparate phenomena.

As we critique these findings, it becomes evident that the cosmos of professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the gravitational pull of amusement park attendance in Delaware intersect in ways that transcend conventional boundaries, inviting us to explore the quantum entanglement of seemingly incongruent realms with a sense of humor and intellectual curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are and The number of amusement park attendants in Delaware. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2015 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Quantum Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between PBS Space Time YouTube Video Titles and Amusement Park Attendance in Delaware

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious correlation between the seemingly unrelated realms of professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the fluctuating attendance numbers at amusement parks in the state of Delaware. Using a combination of AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a whimsical journey to investigate this perplexing connection. The findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8563760 and p < 0.01 for the years 2015 to 2022, shedding light on the quantum implications of how video titles may influence the whimsical world of amusement park attendance. This paper not only unlocks a novel area of interdisciplinary research but also serves as a testament to the surprising serendipities that emerge when delving into the world of seemingly disparate phenomena.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The arcane realms of PBS Space Time videos and amusement park attendance may seem as distant as the far reaches of the cosmos, but this study unearths a quantum connection that defies conventional wisdom. While one could argue that the relationship between the two is as inexplicable as dark matter, our research team dove headfirst into this enigmatic conundrum, navigating the nebulous corridors of professional-sounding video titles and the whimsical ebb and flow of amusement park crowds.
The genesis of this research was imbued with a sense of whimsy, prompting us to ponder the peculiar relationship between the captivating allure of astrophysical explorations and the magnetic pull of roller coasters and funnel cakes. The juxtaposition of these seemingly incongruent entities compelled us to embark on a journey that was equal parts exhilarating and confounding.
At the outset, the sheer juxtaposition of space-time explorations and amusement park merriment evoked a sense of absurdity that pervaded our scholarly pursuits. However, beneath the surface of this odd juxtaposition lay a tapestry of statistical intrigue and speculative musings, with the formless void of uncertainty giving way to the reliable constellations of empirical data.
The enigmatic dance between PBS Space Time video titles and the annual wave of amusement park goers in Delaware beckoned us toward uncharted territories of interdisciplinary inquiry. We were impelled to unravel this unlikely fusion, akin to unraveling the fabric of space-time itself, and bring forth a unifying theory that resonates in the expanse of both intellectual curiosity and recreational indulgence.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to probe the mysterious link between the otherworldly allure of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the gravitational pull of amusement park attendance in Delaware, our research team embarked on an odyssey through the virtual cosmos of online video content and the tangible terrain of amusement park data.

First and foremost, our intrepid journey began with the procurement of a substantial dataset encompassing YouTube video titles from the revered PBS Space Time channel. Leveraging the arcane arts of artificial intelligence and natural language processing, our AI-empowered cohort meticulously dissected and scrutinized the linguistic attributes of these video titles. We explored the depths of professional-sounding vocabulary, esoteric scientific terminologies, and the gravitational forces of clickbait elements that pervade the digital firmament.

In parallel, we lifted the veils of empirical inquiry by tapping into the treasure trove of amusement park attendance figures recorded by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Gleaning through these attendance numbers with the nimbleness of astrophysical phenomena, we sought to discern the undulations and convolutions of annual footfall at amusement parks in the state of Delaware.

Following this initial phase of data excavation, we ardently chaperoned these disparate datasets through the cosmic pathways of statistical analysis. Employing a potent fusion of correlation coefficients, multivariate regressions, and hypothesis testing, we sought to discern the shadowy contours of a potential correlation between the enigmatic expanse of PBS Space Time video titles and the buoyant tides of amusement park attendance in Delaware.

Moreover, to challenge the very fabric of conventional causality, we also conducted a series of time series analyses and autoregressive models to unravel the temporal dynamics of this correlation over the years 2015 to 2022. This temporal weaving allowed us to witness the fascinating ebb and flow of these seemingly unrelated phenomena.

It must be readily acknowledged that our research odyssey was not devoid of the treacherous shoals of confounding variables and potential lurking uncertainties. To combat these perils, we employed robust sensitivity analyses and conducted detailed robustness checks to ensure the resilience and resilience of our findings against the distorting nebulae of extraneous factors.

Finally, our exploration of this quixotic interplay called for the evocative construction of visual renditions in the form of scatter plots, bar graphs, and spatiotemporal overlays. Through these visual tapestries, we endeavored to conjure the captivating narratives that unfold at the intersection of quantum astrophysics and the unassuming revelry of amusement park merriment.

In sum, our methodology entailed a synthesis of esoteric linguistic dissections, empirical promenades through amusement park data, cosmic statistical incantations, and visual expositions, unfurling a research tapestry that traverses the ethereal corridors of digital space-time and the effervescent realms of carousel-tinged delight.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are and The number of amusement park attendants in Delaware. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2015 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8563760, r-squared of 0.7333798, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Quantum Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between PBS Space Time YouTube Video Titles and Amusement Park Attendance in Delaware

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious correlation between the seemingly unrelated realms of professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the fluctuating attendance numbers at amusement parks in the state of Delaware. Using a combination of AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a whimsical journey to investigate this perplexing connection. The findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8563760 and p < 0.01 for the years 2015 to 2022, shedding light on the quantum implications of how video titles may influence the whimsical world of amusement park attendance. This paper not only unlocks a novel area of interdisciplinary research but also serves as a testament to the surprising serendipities that emerge when delving into the world of seemingly disparate phenomena.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The arcane realms of PBS Space Time videos and amusement park attendance may seem as distant as the far reaches of the cosmos, but this study unearths a quantum connection that defies conventional wisdom. While one could argue that the relationship between the two is as inexplicable as dark matter, our research team dove headfirst into this enigmatic conundrum, navigating the nebulous corridors of professional-sounding video titles and the whimsical ebb and flow of amusement park crowds.
The genesis of this research was imbued with a sense of whimsy, prompting us to ponder the peculiar relationship between the captivating allure of astrophysical explorations and the magnetic pull of roller coasters and funnel cakes. The juxtaposition of these seemingly incongruent entities compelled us to embark on a journey that was equal parts exhilarating and confounding.
At the outset, the sheer juxtaposition of space-time explorations and amusement park merriment evoked a sense of absurdity that pervaded our scholarly pursuits. However, beneath the surface of this odd juxtaposition lay a tapestry of statistical intrigue and speculative musings, with the formless void of uncertainty giving way to the reliable constellations of empirical data.
The enigmatic dance between PBS Space Time video titles and the annual wave of amusement park goers in Delaware beckoned us toward uncharted territories of interdisciplinary inquiry. We were impelled to unravel this unlikely fusion, akin to unraveling the fabric of space-time itself, and bring forth a unifying theory that resonates in the expanse of both intellectual curiosity and recreational indulgence.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of a mass of data collected from the ethereal depths of the internet and the dependable records of Bureau of Labor Statistics unveiled a striking correlation between professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and amusement park attendance in the charming state of Delaware. Our findings revealed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8563760, an r-squared of 0.7333798, and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2015 to 2022.

The wittily named Fig. 1 depicts the conspicuous relationship between the two variables. It is quite the eye-opener, or shall we say "ride-opener", revealing a strong positive correlation that mirrors the gravitational force of a roller coaster in action.

The statistical significance of our findings not only astonishes the rational mind but also tickles the fancy of the whimsical observer, akin to the perplexing allure of a mind-bending amusement park attraction.

The results of this study provide unprecedented evidence of the interconnectedness between the esoteric realms of astrophysics and the merry-go-rounds of amusement park frolics. This paper extends a cosmic invitation to explore the quantum entanglement of seemingly unrelated phenomena, beckoning researchers to embark on a kaleidoscopic journey that traverses the playful and the profound.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are and The number of amusement park attendants in Delaware. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Quantum Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between PBS Space Time YouTube Video Titles and Amusement Park Attendance in Delaware

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious correlation between the seemingly unrelated realms of professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the fluctuating attendance numbers at amusement parks in the state of Delaware. Using a combination of AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a whimsical journey to investigate this perplexing connection. The findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8563760 and p < 0.01 for the years 2015 to 2022, shedding light on the quantum implications of how video titles may influence the whimsical world of amusement park attendance. This paper not only unlocks a novel area of interdisciplinary research but also serves as a testament to the surprising serendipities that emerge when delving into the world of seemingly disparate phenomena.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their groundbreaking work, Smith et al. (2020) unearthed the nuanced relationship between professional-sounding YouTube video titles and their impact on viewer engagement. The authors find that a meticulously crafted video title can serve as the gravitational force that draws curious minds into the enigmatic cosmos of astrophysical phenomena. While their study primarily focuses on online engagement metrics, the implications of their findings resonate deep within the unexplored corridors of amusement park attendance dynamics.
Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the heart of amusement park economics, unraveling the intricate interplay of consumer spending, seasonal trends, and the alluring appeal of thrill rides. Their analysis reveals the mercurial nature of amusement park attendance, which ebbs and flows like the tides of an unpredictable cosmic expanse.
Turning to related non-fiction literature, "Astrophysics for People in a Hurry" by Neil deGrasse Tyson contemplates the mysteries of the universe in a way that mirrors the curious allure of amusement park adventures. Similarly, "Roller Coaster: Wooden and Steel Coasters, Twisters and Corkscrews" by Robert Cartmell invites readers to ponder the exhilarating thrills of roller coasters, much like the captivating pull of PBS Space Time videos.
On a more speculative note, the works of fiction such as "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams and "Ready Player One" by Ernest Cline weave imaginative narratives that evoke the whimsical juxtaposition of cosmic escapades and recreational escapism. These literary escapades echo the perplexing fusion that our research seeks to illuminate.
Notably, internet memes such as the "This is Fine" dog and the "Infinite Jest" references resonate with the themes of perplexing connections and enigmatic juxtapositions, serving as playful reminders of the uncanny interplay between seemingly disparate phenomena.
As we critique these findings, it becomes evident that the cosmos of professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the gravitational pull of amusement park attendance in Delaware intersect in ways that transcend conventional boundaries, inviting us to explore the quantum entanglement of seemingly incongruent realms with a sense of humor and intellectual curiosity.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of a mass of data collected from the ethereal depths of the internet and the dependable records of Bureau of Labor Statistics unveiled a striking correlation between professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and amusement park attendance in the charming state of Delaware. Our findings revealed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8563760, an r-squared of 0.7333798, and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2015 to 2022.
The wittily named Fig. 1 depicts the conspicuous relationship between the two variables. It is quite the eye-opener, or shall we say "ride-opener", revealing a strong positive correlation that mirrors the gravitational force of a roller coaster in action.
The statistical significance of our findings not only astonishes the rational mind but also tickles the fancy of the whimsical observer, akin to the perplexing allure of a mind-bending amusement park attraction.
The results of this study provide unprecedented evidence of the interconnectedness between the esoteric realms of astrophysics and the merry-go-rounds of amusement park frolics. This paper extends a cosmic invitation to explore the quantum entanglement of seemingly unrelated phenomena, beckoning researchers to embark on a kaleidoscopic journey that traverses the playful and the profound.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The implications of our research are as mind-boggling as the black hole phenomena studied in the PBS Space Time videos. Our findings not only corroborate but also augment the existing knowledge in both astrophysics and amusement park economics - a seemingly odd couple that has now found itself entangled in the cosmic dance of interconnectedness. The correlation coefficient of 0.8563760 between professional YouTube video titles and amusement park attendance is a revelation that ushers in an era of quantum leaps in interdisciplinary research.

Smith et al. (2020) presented valuable insights into the captivating force of engaging video titles. Just as the gravitational pull of a celestial body determines the motion of other bodies in space, our study affirms that professional-sounding video titles can similarly exert an attractive force on the public's leisure activities. This connection is not merely astronomical; it's positively astronomical! Meanwhile, the musings of Doe and Jones (2018) on amusement park attendance dynamics have been infused with a sprinkle of stardust from the cosmic correlations revealed in our study. Just as roller coasters embody the thrill of physical acceleration, our findings accelerate the intellectual pulse as we witness the interplay of astrophysical concepts in the mundane world of amusement park excursions.

Our results validate the whimsical connections drawn from the non-fiction and speculative realms of literature. The light-hearted, yet insightful, astrophysical musings of Neil deGrasse Tyson and the roller coaster escapades detailed by Robert Cartmell charm us with their parallels to our research findings. In a similar vein, the elusive themes of "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" and the virtual realms of "Ready Player One" draw amusing parallels to our unexpected discovery. Just as unexpected plot twists keep readers hooked, our research presents a twist of cosmic proportions in the narrative of scholarly inquiry.

The internet memes of the "This is Fine" dog and "Infinite Jest" serve as playful embodiments of the unexpected entanglements we've explored. It's almost as if the playful jester in all of us has manipulated the cosmic strings to reveal the whimsical connections between PBS Space Time videos and amusement park attendance, leaving us to wonder if life truly imitates art or if it's all just a series of interconnected jokes and puns.

In conclusion, our study essentially serves as a cosmic funhouse mirror, reflecting the uncanny entanglement of apparently incongruent phenomena. It challenges researchers to embrace the interplay of lighthearted amusement and profound insights and invites them to tighten their seatbelts for a roller coaster ride through the whimsical depths of interdisciplinary inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are and The number of amusement park attendants in Delaware. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Quantum Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between PBS Space Time YouTube Video Titles and Amusement Park Attendance in Delaware

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious correlation between the seemingly unrelated realms of professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the fluctuating attendance numbers at amusement parks in the state of Delaware. Using a combination of AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a whimsical journey to investigate this perplexing connection. The findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8563760 and p < 0.01 for the years 2015 to 2022, shedding light on the quantum implications of how video titles may influence the whimsical world of amusement park attendance. This paper not only unlocks a novel area of interdisciplinary research but also serves as a testament to the surprising serendipities that emerge when delving into the world of seemingly disparate phenomena.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The arcane realms of PBS Space Time videos and amusement park attendance may seem as distant as the far reaches of the cosmos, but this study unearths a quantum connection that defies conventional wisdom. While one could argue that the relationship between the two is as inexplicable as dark matter, our research team dove headfirst into this enigmatic conundrum, navigating the nebulous corridors of professional-sounding video titles and the whimsical ebb and flow of amusement park crowds.
The genesis of this research was imbued with a sense of whimsy, prompting us to ponder the peculiar relationship between the captivating allure of astrophysical explorations and the magnetic pull of roller coasters and funnel cakes. The juxtaposition of these seemingly incongruent entities compelled us to embark on a journey that was equal parts exhilarating and confounding.
At the outset, the sheer juxtaposition of space-time explorations and amusement park merriment evoked a sense of absurdity that pervaded our scholarly pursuits. However, beneath the surface of this odd juxtaposition lay a tapestry of statistical intrigue and speculative musings, with the formless void of uncertainty giving way to the reliable constellations of empirical data.
The enigmatic dance between PBS Space Time video titles and the annual wave of amusement park goers in Delaware beckoned us toward uncharted territories of interdisciplinary inquiry. We were impelled to unravel this unlikely fusion, akin to unraveling the fabric of space-time itself, and bring forth a unifying theory that resonates in the expanse of both intellectual curiosity and recreational indulgence.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of a mass of data collected from the ethereal depths of the internet and the dependable records of Bureau of Labor Statistics unveiled a striking correlation between professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and amusement park attendance in the charming state of Delaware. Our findings revealed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8563760, an r-squared of 0.7333798, and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2015 to 2022.
The wittily named Fig. 1 depicts the conspicuous relationship between the two variables. It is quite the eye-opener, or shall we say "ride-opener", revealing a strong positive correlation that mirrors the gravitational force of a roller coaster in action.
The statistical significance of our findings not only astonishes the rational mind but also tickles the fancy of the whimsical observer, akin to the perplexing allure of a mind-bending amusement park attraction.
The results of this study provide unprecedented evidence of the interconnectedness between the esoteric realms of astrophysics and the merry-go-rounds of amusement park frolics. This paper extends a cosmic invitation to explore the quantum entanglement of seemingly unrelated phenomena, beckoning researchers to embark on a kaleidoscopic journey that traverses the playful and the profound.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the findings of this study illuminate the peculiar but undeniably substantial correlation between the enigmatic allure of professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the ebullient ebb and flow of amusement park attendance in the whimsical state of Delaware. Our research has opened the gates to a realm of inquiry that transcends the expected boundaries of scholarly exploration, much like a roller coaster hurtling beyond the confines of everyday experience.
The findings, with their statistically significant correlation coefficient and p-value, not only reinforce the gravitational pull of engaging video titles but also tantalizingly hint at the quantum fluctuations that underpin the fabric of amusement park attendance. The eye-catching Fig. 1 serves as a delightful enticement, much like a whimsically named amusement park attraction, urging scholars to partake in this amusement park of interdisciplinary inquiry.
This whimsical pursuit unearths a quantum connection that, much like a captivating thrill ride, promises to leave our scholarly minds reeling with wonder and amusement. Furthermore, the findings of this research emphasize the unpredictable merriment of the academic journey, where scholarly endeavors often mirror the exhilarating twists and turns of a whimsical amusement park ride.
In light of these findings, it is safe to assert that no further research is needed in this area, as we have plumbed the depths of this quantum correlation, leaving no stone unturned, and no roller coaster un-ridden.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Quantum Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between PBS Space Time YouTube Video Titles and Amusement Park Attendance in Delaware. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Amusement Park Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Quantum Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between PBS Space Time YouTube Video Titles and Amusement Park Attendance in Delaware. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Interdimensional Amusement Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Quantum Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between PBS Space Time YouTube Video Titles and Amusement Park Attendance in Delaware with an abstract of This study delves into the curious correlation between the seemingly unrelated realms of professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the fluctuating attendance numbers at amusement parks in the state of Delaware. Using a combination of AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a whimsical journey to investigate this perplexing connection. The findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8563760 and p < 0.01 for the years 2015 to 2022, shedding light on the quantum implications of how video titles may influence the whimsical world of amusement park attendance. This paper not only unlocks a novel area of interdisciplinary research but also serves as a testament to the surprising serendipities that emerge when delving into the world of seemingly disparate phenomena.

ChatGPT:

PBS Space Time, YouTube, video titles, amusement park, attendance, Delaware, correlation, AI analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, research, quantum implications, interdisciplinary, serendipities

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are

The number of amusement park attendants in Delaware
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of amusement and recreation attendants in Delaware
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of amusement park attendants in Delaware

Correlation r = 0.8563760 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7333798 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 73.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of amusement park attendants in Delaware) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are) over the 8 years from 2015 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0066. 0.0066317269301160815000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 0.66% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 151 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.38, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20152016201720182019202020212022
How professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are (Score (out of 10))7.48848.14587.63837.931887.75567.63898.1111
The number of amusement park attendants in Delaware (Laborers)11801420129013901490127010901430




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7.4884,8.1458,7.6383,7.9318,8,7.7556,7.6389,8.1111,])
array_2 = np.array([1180,1420,1290,1390,1490,1270,1090,1430,])
array_1_name = "How professional-sounding PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "The number of amusement park attendants in Delaware"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 5793 · Black Variable ID: 25656 · Red Variable ID: 6192
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0