about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,752 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the 'loss' meme and the second variable is Amazon's shipping revenue in millions of dollars.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2016, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the 'loss' meme gained popularity, more people were creating and ordering custom merchandise featuring the meme. This led to a significant increase in the number of small, oddly shaped packages being shipped, ultimately boosting Amazon's shipping revenue. It seems like the real 'loss' was incurred by anyone trying to make sense of this correlation!

Create a meme inspired by the loss meme that in some way references Amazon's shipping revenue in millions of dollars. Try to emulate the style of the meme - don’t violate the copyright, just make it look and feel like the original meme.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the 'loss' meme caused Amazon's shipping revenue in millions of dollars to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Shipping the Loss: A Correlational Study of the 'loss' Meme Popularity and Amazon's Revenue

The Journal of Internet Memetics and E-Commerce Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'loss' meme and Amazon's shipping revenue in millions of dollars. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9767526 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2016.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Shipping the Loss: A Correlational Study of the 'loss' Meme Popularity and Amazon's Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unforeseen connection between the rising popularity of the 'loss' meme and the fluctuations in Amazon's shipping revenue. Using data from Google Trends and Statista, our research team analyzed the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Surprisingly, a strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9767526 was discovered, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2016. This paper explores the implications of this unexpected relationship and delves into the potential impact of internet memes on e-commerce. We highlight the importance of considering cultural trends in understanding consumer behavior and urge further investigation into the influence of memes on economic indicators.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'loss' meme and Amazon's shipping revenue in millions of dollars. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shipping the Loss: A Correlational Study of the 'loss' Meme Popularity and Amazon's Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unforeseen connection between the rising popularity of the 'loss' meme and the fluctuations in Amazon's shipping revenue. Using data from Google Trends and Statista, our research team analyzed the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Surprisingly, a strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9767526 was discovered, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2016. This paper explores the implications of this unexpected relationship and delves into the potential impact of internet memes on e-commerce. We highlight the importance of considering cultural trends in understanding consumer behavior and urge further investigation into the influence of memes on economic indicators.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of internet memes and economic indicators has long been a subject of intrigue and humor among both academics and internet users. However, few could have predicted the peculiar correlation between the rising popularity of the 'loss' meme and its impact on Amazon's shipping revenue. This unexpected link has ignited a flurry of curiosity and skepticism, prompting us to delve into this bizarre yet fascinating relationship.

At first glance, the idea of a meme affecting the bottom line of a retail giant like Amazon may seem like a non sequitur, but as we embark on this whimsical journey of analysis, we will unravel the curious connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena.

The 'loss' meme, a visual representation often associated with the punchline "Can you do this?," has infiltrated various corners of the internet, captivating the attention of netizens from all walks of life. Its ubiquitous presence has sparked a myriad of reactions, ranging from bewilderment to amusement, and inadvertently led us to ponder the potential economic ramifications of its widespread dissemination.

In this paper, we aim to elucidate the hitherto unexplored impact of memes on e-commerce, with a particular focus on the curious case of the 'loss' meme and its influence on Amazon's shipping revenue. Through meticulous data analysis and statistical scrutiny, we endeavor to shed light on this enigmatic relationship and offer a lighthearted yet profound examination of the interplay between internet culture and economic trends.

As we navigate through this whimsical labyrinth of internet memes and revenue streams, we invite our readers to partake in this lighthearted expedition and embrace the delightful absurdity that lies at the intersection of online humor and economic analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'loss' meme and Amazon's shipping revenue in millions of dollars. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shipping the Loss: A Correlational Study of the 'loss' Meme Popularity and Amazon's Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unforeseen connection between the rising popularity of the 'loss' meme and the fluctuations in Amazon's shipping revenue. Using data from Google Trends and Statista, our research team analyzed the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Surprisingly, a strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9767526 was discovered, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2016. This paper explores the implications of this unexpected relationship and delves into the potential impact of internet memes on e-commerce. We highlight the importance of considering cultural trends in understanding consumer behavior and urge further investigation into the influence of memes on economic indicators.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of internet memes and economic indicators has long been a subject of intrigue and humor among both academics and internet users. However, few could have predicted the peculiar correlation between the rising popularity of the 'loss' meme and its impact on Amazon's shipping revenue. This unexpected link has ignited a flurry of curiosity and skepticism, prompting us to delve into this bizarre yet fascinating relationship.
At first glance, the idea of a meme affecting the bottom line of a retail giant like Amazon may seem like a non sequitur, but as we embark on this whimsical journey of analysis, we will unravel the curious connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena.
The 'loss' meme, a visual representation often associated with the punchline "Can you do this?," has infiltrated various corners of the internet, captivating the attention of netizens from all walks of life. Its ubiquitous presence has sparked a myriad of reactions, ranging from bewilderment to amusement, and inadvertently led us to ponder the potential economic ramifications of its widespread dissemination.
In this paper, we aim to elucidate the hitherto unexplored impact of memes on e-commerce, with a particular focus on the curious case of the 'loss' meme and its influence on Amazon's shipping revenue. Through meticulous data analysis and statistical scrutiny, we endeavor to shed light on this enigmatic relationship and offer a lighthearted yet profound examination of the interplay between internet culture and economic trends.
As we navigate through this whimsical labyrinth of internet memes and revenue streams, we invite our readers to partake in this lighthearted expedition and embrace the delightful absurdity that lies at the intersection of online humor and economic analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The present research aims to shed light on the curious link between the burgeoning popularity of the 'loss' meme and the fluctuations in Amazon's shipping revenue. This section provides an overview of existing literature related to internet memes, economic indicators, and potential connections between the two.

In "Trends in Internet Culture" by Smith et al., the authors find a growing fascination with internet memes and their influence on popular culture. The study delves into the evolution of memes from niche online communities to mainstream media, highlighting the impact of memes on shaping societal trends and behaviors. Moreover, Doe's "Economic Implications of Online Phenomena" explores the unanticipated influence of internet phenomena on consumer patterns, such as the rise of viral content and its impact on consumer spending. Jones' "Internet Memes and Social Dynamics" provides a comprehensive analysis of the societal impact of internet memes, shedding light on their implications for various domains, including economics.

Moving from non-fiction sources to related fictional works, "The Shipping Saga" by L. Reader examines the fantastical journey of a meme's impact on a fictional e-commerce empire, drawing parallels to our current investigation. Additionally, "The Meme Effect" by A. Writer takes a whimsical approach to exploring the fantastical connections between internet memes and unexpected real-world outcomes, providing a light-hearted yet insightful perspective on the phenomenon.

Expanding the scope of literature review beyond traditional academic sources, the authors also conducted a thorough review of unconventional materials, including the back labels of shampoo bottles and fortune cookies. While these sources might seem unrelated to the subject matter, they provided unexpected and surprisingly humorous insights into the potential connections between internet memes and economic factors.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'loss' meme and Amazon's shipping revenue in millions of dollars. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Statista . You used data from 2007 to 2016

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shipping the Loss: A Correlational Study of the 'loss' Meme Popularity and Amazon's Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unforeseen connection between the rising popularity of the 'loss' meme and the fluctuations in Amazon's shipping revenue. Using data from Google Trends and Statista, our research team analyzed the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Surprisingly, a strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9767526 was discovered, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2016. This paper explores the implications of this unexpected relationship and delves into the potential impact of internet memes on e-commerce. We highlight the importance of considering cultural trends in understanding consumer behavior and urge further investigation into the influence of memes on economic indicators.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of internet memes and economic indicators has long been a subject of intrigue and humor among both academics and internet users. However, few could have predicted the peculiar correlation between the rising popularity of the 'loss' meme and its impact on Amazon's shipping revenue. This unexpected link has ignited a flurry of curiosity and skepticism, prompting us to delve into this bizarre yet fascinating relationship.
At first glance, the idea of a meme affecting the bottom line of a retail giant like Amazon may seem like a non sequitur, but as we embark on this whimsical journey of analysis, we will unravel the curious connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena.
The 'loss' meme, a visual representation often associated with the punchline "Can you do this?," has infiltrated various corners of the internet, captivating the attention of netizens from all walks of life. Its ubiquitous presence has sparked a myriad of reactions, ranging from bewilderment to amusement, and inadvertently led us to ponder the potential economic ramifications of its widespread dissemination.
In this paper, we aim to elucidate the hitherto unexplored impact of memes on e-commerce, with a particular focus on the curious case of the 'loss' meme and its influence on Amazon's shipping revenue. Through meticulous data analysis and statistical scrutiny, we endeavor to shed light on this enigmatic relationship and offer a lighthearted yet profound examination of the interplay between internet culture and economic trends.
As we navigate through this whimsical labyrinth of internet memes and revenue streams, we invite our readers to partake in this lighthearted expedition and embrace the delightful absurdity that lies at the intersection of online humor and economic analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the mystifying correlation between the 'loss' meme popularity and Amazon's shipping revenue, our research team embarked on a methodological journey that combined rigorous data analysis with a sprinkle of internet humor. The primary data sources for this investigation were Google Trends and Statista, which provided a treasure trove of information on the temporal trends of the 'loss' meme and Amazon's shipping revenue from the years 2007 to 2016.

The methodology employed a dance of statistical techniques, beginning with the enthralling art of data collection from the vast expanse of the internet. Utilizing advanced web scraping algorithms that combed through the digital terrain, we adeptly gathered the relevant search interest data for the 'loss' meme and Amazon's shipping revenue figures. The data, resembling scattered puzzle pieces from the information superhighway, were meticulously organized for subsequent analysis.

Subsequently, the gathered datasets underwent a ceremonious cleansing ritual, where outliers and anomalies were gently coaxed out of the ensemble. A series of robust statistical techniques, ranging from dispersion measures to funky cluster analysis, were applied to ensure the purity and integrity of the datasets.

With the data suitably groomed and adorned, the method of choice for the correlation analysis was none other than the venerable Pearson correlation coefficient. By elegantly measuring the strength and direction of the linear relationship between the monthly search interest in the 'loss' meme and the monthly Amazon shipping revenue in millions of dollars, this technique formed the heart of our investigation.

Not content with a mere linear correlation, the research team also explored the wondrous realm of time series analysis to unravel the temporal dynamics of the 'loss' meme's meteoric rise and its uncanny association with Amazon's shipping revenue. The enchanting dance of autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models and seasonality decomposition further enriched our understanding of the interconnected rhythms of internet culture and commercial activities.

In a nod to the tradition of comic relief, the methodology also dabbled in the realm of sentiment analysis and natural language processing, in a lighthearted attempt to capture the emotional undercurrents of the 'loss' meme's influence on consumer behavior. By using text-mining algorithms to decode the humorous nuances embedded within online discussions, the research team sought to infuse a quirky flavor into the research process.

After adorning the datasets with these delightful analytic techniques, the findings were synchronized in a robust statistical software, where the magical incantations of hypothesis testing and p-values bestowed a stamp of statistical significance upon our correlation coefficient. With a solemn nod to the gods of statistical validity, the p-value emerged victorious, signaling the presence of a zealous relationship between the 'loss' meme and Amazon's shipping revenue.

Ultimately, this methodological odyssey fused the rigors of statistical analysis with the whimsical charm of internet culture, unveiling a correlation that defied conventional wisdom. With a twinkle in our eyes and a zest for scholarly adventure, the research team emerged from this methodological escapade, armed with an empirical understanding of the merry dance between memes and commerce.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'loss' meme and Amazon's shipping revenue in millions of dollars. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Statista .

For the time period 2007 to 2016, you found a correlation 0.9767526, r-squared of 0.9540457, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shipping the Loss: A Correlational Study of the 'loss' Meme Popularity and Amazon's Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unforeseen connection between the rising popularity of the 'loss' meme and the fluctuations in Amazon's shipping revenue. Using data from Google Trends and Statista, our research team analyzed the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Surprisingly, a strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9767526 was discovered, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2016. This paper explores the implications of this unexpected relationship and delves into the potential impact of internet memes on e-commerce. We highlight the importance of considering cultural trends in understanding consumer behavior and urge further investigation into the influence of memes on economic indicators.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of internet memes and economic indicators has long been a subject of intrigue and humor among both academics and internet users. However, few could have predicted the peculiar correlation between the rising popularity of the 'loss' meme and its impact on Amazon's shipping revenue. This unexpected link has ignited a flurry of curiosity and skepticism, prompting us to delve into this bizarre yet fascinating relationship.
At first glance, the idea of a meme affecting the bottom line of a retail giant like Amazon may seem like a non sequitur, but as we embark on this whimsical journey of analysis, we will unravel the curious connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena.
The 'loss' meme, a visual representation often associated with the punchline "Can you do this?," has infiltrated various corners of the internet, captivating the attention of netizens from all walks of life. Its ubiquitous presence has sparked a myriad of reactions, ranging from bewilderment to amusement, and inadvertently led us to ponder the potential economic ramifications of its widespread dissemination.
In this paper, we aim to elucidate the hitherto unexplored impact of memes on e-commerce, with a particular focus on the curious case of the 'loss' meme and its influence on Amazon's shipping revenue. Through meticulous data analysis and statistical scrutiny, we endeavor to shed light on this enigmatic relationship and offer a lighthearted yet profound examination of the interplay between internet culture and economic trends.
As we navigate through this whimsical labyrinth of internet memes and revenue streams, we invite our readers to partake in this lighthearted expedition and embrace the delightful absurdity that lies at the intersection of online humor and economic analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the popularity of the 'loss' meme and Amazon's shipping revenue. The correlation coefficient of 0.9767526 indicated a nearly perfect positive linear relationship between the two variables, a finding that was met with both astonishment and amusement by our research team. It appears that the 'loss' meme, much like a package in transit, has indeed left its mark on Amazon's revenue stream.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9540457 suggests that approximately 95.4% of the variability in Amazon's shipping revenue can be explained by the fluctuations in the popularity of the 'loss' meme. This finding, while unexpected, underscores the substantial causal factor that the 'loss' meme may represent in the realm of e-commerce.

The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant, lending further credence to the notion that the 'loss' meme's influence on Amazon's shipping revenue is not merely a matter of chance. Thus, it seems that the impact of internet memes on economic indicators may not be as trivial as it is often purported to be.

In Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually depicts the robust positive correlation between the popularity of the 'loss' meme and Amazon's shipping revenue. The data points align themselves in a near-perfect linear fashion, affirming the surprising relationship uncovered through our analysis. It seems that for every collective sigh of "Can you do this?" in response to the 'loss' meme, there may be a corresponding uptick in Amazon's shipping revenue.

The implications of these findings are as bewildering as they are intriguing, and they prompt a reconsideration of the purported frivolity of internet memes in influencing economic trends. This unexpected correlation invites humor and contemplation as we grapple with the undeniable impact of internet culture on the ebb and flow of commerce. It is clear that the 'loss' meme, in all its quirky glory, has etched itself into the annals of economic analysis, presenting a new frontier of inquiry into the interplay between internet phenomena and market forces.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'loss' meme and Amazon's shipping revenue in millions of dollars. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Shipping the Loss: A Correlational Study of the 'loss' Meme Popularity and Amazon's Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unforeseen connection between the rising popularity of the 'loss' meme and the fluctuations in Amazon's shipping revenue. Using data from Google Trends and Statista, our research team analyzed the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Surprisingly, a strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9767526 was discovered, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2016. This paper explores the implications of this unexpected relationship and delves into the potential impact of internet memes on e-commerce. We highlight the importance of considering cultural trends in understanding consumer behavior and urge further investigation into the influence of memes on economic indicators.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The present research aims to shed light on the curious link between the burgeoning popularity of the 'loss' meme and the fluctuations in Amazon's shipping revenue. This section provides an overview of existing literature related to internet memes, economic indicators, and potential connections between the two.
In "Trends in Internet Culture" by Smith et al., the authors find a growing fascination with internet memes and their influence on popular culture. The study delves into the evolution of memes from niche online communities to mainstream media, highlighting the impact of memes on shaping societal trends and behaviors. Moreover, Doe's "Economic Implications of Online Phenomena" explores the unanticipated influence of internet phenomena on consumer patterns, such as the rise of viral content and its impact on consumer spending. Jones' "Internet Memes and Social Dynamics" provides a comprehensive analysis of the societal impact of internet memes, shedding light on their implications for various domains, including economics.
Moving from non-fiction sources to related fictional works, "The Shipping Saga" by L. Reader examines the fantastical journey of a meme's impact on a fictional e-commerce empire, drawing parallels to our current investigation. Additionally, "The Meme Effect" by A. Writer takes a whimsical approach to exploring the fantastical connections between internet memes and unexpected real-world outcomes, providing a light-hearted yet insightful perspective on the phenomenon.
Expanding the scope of literature review beyond traditional academic sources, the authors also conducted a thorough review of unconventional materials, including the back labels of shampoo bottles and fortune cookies. While these sources might seem unrelated to the subject matter, they provided unexpected and surprisingly humorous insights into the potential connections between internet memes and economic factors.


[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the popularity of the 'loss' meme and Amazon's shipping revenue. The correlation coefficient of 0.9767526 indicated a nearly perfect positive linear relationship between the two variables, a finding that was met with both astonishment and amusement by our research team. It appears that the 'loss' meme, much like a package in transit, has indeed left its mark on Amazon's revenue stream.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9540457 suggests that approximately 95.4% of the variability in Amazon's shipping revenue can be explained by the fluctuations in the popularity of the 'loss' meme. This finding, while unexpected, underscores the substantial causal factor that the 'loss' meme may represent in the realm of e-commerce.
The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant, lending further credence to the notion that the 'loss' meme's influence on Amazon's shipping revenue is not merely a matter of chance. Thus, it seems that the impact of internet memes on economic indicators may not be as trivial as it is often purported to be.
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually depicts the robust positive correlation between the popularity of the 'loss' meme and Amazon's shipping revenue. The data points align themselves in a near-perfect linear fashion, affirming the surprising relationship uncovered through our analysis. It seems that for every collective sigh of "Can you do this?" in response to the 'loss' meme, there may be a corresponding uptick in Amazon's shipping revenue.
The implications of these findings are as bewildering as they are intriguing, and they prompt a reconsideration of the purported frivolity of internet memes in influencing economic trends. This unexpected correlation invites humor and contemplation as we grapple with the undeniable impact of internet culture on the ebb and flow of commerce. It is clear that the 'loss' meme, in all its quirky glory, has etched itself into the annals of economic analysis, presenting a new frontier of inquiry into the interplay between internet phenomena and market forces.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The unanticipated connection uncovered in this study between the 'loss' meme and Amazon's shipping revenue provokes both head-scratching bemusement and scholarly bewilderment. Our findings not only echo previous research regarding the influence of internet memes on societal trends, but they also highlight the unexpected sway of meme culture on economic indicators. The ludicrous notion of a meme altering a colossal e-commerce enterprise such as Amazon is, dare I say, a "shipping revelation."

Drawing from the literature review, Smith et al.'s analysis of internet memes and popular culture gains newfound gravity in light of our results. The cultivated fascination with 'loss' and its impact on consumer behavior, as explored by Doe, has been substantiated through our rigorous correlation analysis. Additionally, Jones' comprehensive work on internet memes' societal influence finds practical application in our study's discovery of a significant link between a specific meme and a tangible economic variable.

One cannot help but recall the whimsical insights gleaned from unconventional sources during our literature review. The fanciful parallel drawn by L. Reader in "The Shipping Saga" suddenly doesn't seem so far-fetched, and the seemingly lighthearted musings of A. Writer in "The Meme Effect" now appear remarkably prescient in light of our empirical findings. It seems that humor and scholarly inquiry are not mutually exclusive and, in fact, can intersect in ways that yield surprising revelations.

While the idea of a meme being a latent influencer of e-commerce might initially seem like a "package of jokes," our results compel a reconsideration of the assumed triviality of internet phenomena in the realm of commerce. The robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value underscore the substantial impact of the 'loss' meme on Amazon's shipping revenue, casting a humorous yet thought-provoking light on the often-dismissed role of memes in economic dynamics.

The scatterplot, depicting the near-perfect linear relationship between the 'loss' meme's popularity and Amazon's shipping revenue, provides an amusing visual commentary on the unexpected interplay of virtual culture and real-world commerce. It appears that, much like the delivery of an online order, the influence of the 'loss' meme on Amazon's shipping revenue unfolds in surprisingly predictable ways, leaving us to ponder the whimsical mechanics of memetic economy.

In conclusion, the results of this study not only affirm the unexpected connection between the 'loss' meme and Amazon's shipping revenue but also prompt a reevaluation of the role of internet memes in shaping economic trends. This correlation, though seemingly ludicrous at first glance, beckons further scholarly exploration into the far-reaching impact of internet culture. As we bid adieu to this discussion, let us not forget the adage that when it comes to memes and money, one may indeed find that the "real loss" is not taking them seriously.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'loss' meme and Amazon's shipping revenue in millions of dollars. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Shipping the Loss: A Correlational Study of the 'loss' Meme Popularity and Amazon's Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unforeseen connection between the rising popularity of the 'loss' meme and the fluctuations in Amazon's shipping revenue. Using data from Google Trends and Statista, our research team analyzed the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Surprisingly, a strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9767526 was discovered, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2016. This paper explores the implications of this unexpected relationship and delves into the potential impact of internet memes on e-commerce. We highlight the importance of considering cultural trends in understanding consumer behavior and urge further investigation into the influence of memes on economic indicators.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of internet memes and economic indicators has long been a subject of intrigue and humor among both academics and internet users. However, few could have predicted the peculiar correlation between the rising popularity of the 'loss' meme and its impact on Amazon's shipping revenue. This unexpected link has ignited a flurry of curiosity and skepticism, prompting us to delve into this bizarre yet fascinating relationship.
At first glance, the idea of a meme affecting the bottom line of a retail giant like Amazon may seem like a non sequitur, but as we embark on this whimsical journey of analysis, we will unravel the curious connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena.
The 'loss' meme, a visual representation often associated with the punchline "Can you do this?," has infiltrated various corners of the internet, captivating the attention of netizens from all walks of life. Its ubiquitous presence has sparked a myriad of reactions, ranging from bewilderment to amusement, and inadvertently led us to ponder the potential economic ramifications of its widespread dissemination.
In this paper, we aim to elucidate the hitherto unexplored impact of memes on e-commerce, with a particular focus on the curious case of the 'loss' meme and its influence on Amazon's shipping revenue. Through meticulous data analysis and statistical scrutiny, we endeavor to shed light on this enigmatic relationship and offer a lighthearted yet profound examination of the interplay between internet culture and economic trends.
As we navigate through this whimsical labyrinth of internet memes and revenue streams, we invite our readers to partake in this lighthearted expedition and embrace the delightful absurdity that lies at the intersection of online humor and economic analysis.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the popularity of the 'loss' meme and Amazon's shipping revenue. The correlation coefficient of 0.9767526 indicated a nearly perfect positive linear relationship between the two variables, a finding that was met with both astonishment and amusement by our research team. It appears that the 'loss' meme, much like a package in transit, has indeed left its mark on Amazon's revenue stream.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9540457 suggests that approximately 95.4% of the variability in Amazon's shipping revenue can be explained by the fluctuations in the popularity of the 'loss' meme. This finding, while unexpected, underscores the substantial causal factor that the 'loss' meme may represent in the realm of e-commerce.
The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant, lending further credence to the notion that the 'loss' meme's influence on Amazon's shipping revenue is not merely a matter of chance. Thus, it seems that the impact of internet memes on economic indicators may not be as trivial as it is often purported to be.
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually depicts the robust positive correlation between the popularity of the 'loss' meme and Amazon's shipping revenue. The data points align themselves in a near-perfect linear fashion, affirming the surprising relationship uncovered through our analysis. It seems that for every collective sigh of "Can you do this?" in response to the 'loss' meme, there may be a corresponding uptick in Amazon's shipping revenue.
The implications of these findings are as bewildering as they are intriguing, and they prompt a reconsideration of the purported frivolity of internet memes in influencing economic trends. This unexpected correlation invites humor and contemplation as we grapple with the undeniable impact of internet culture on the ebb and flow of commerce. It is clear that the 'loss' meme, in all its quirky glory, has etched itself into the annals of economic analysis, presenting a new frontier of inquiry into the interplay between internet phenomena and market forces.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has shed light on the unlikely but undeniably "lossful" relationship between the 'loss' meme's popularity and Amazon's shipping revenue. This correlation, with a coefficient so high, you'd think it was on Prime delivery, has left us both scratching our heads and chuckling at the same time. It seems that for Amazon, the 'loss' meme isn't just a fleeting internet fad - it's a real, tangible economic factor. Who would've thought that a simple meme could have such a significant impact on a retail giant's bottom line? This revelation certainly adds a new layer of "prime" importance to internet culture in the realm of e-commerce.

One can't help but ponder the implications of this discovery. Perhaps it's time for economists and marketers to start taking memes more seriously. After all, it appears that a well-timed 'loss' meme wave might just "deliver" some extra revenue for Amazon. And as for internet users, next time you share that 'loss' meme, remember that you might just be contributing to the next spike in shipping revenue!

However, despite the amusement and wonderment this correlation has brought us, it's worth noting that correlation doesn't necessarily imply causation. While our findings are certainly intriguing, more research is needed to unravel the complex web of factors at play. But for now, let's revel in the delightful absurdity of the 'loss' meme's impact on Amazon's shipping revenue. After all, in the world of research, sometimes the most unexpected findings are the most amusing.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Shipping the Loss: A Correlational Study of the 'loss' Meme Popularity and Amazon's Revenue. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Internet Memetics and E-Commerce Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Shipping the Loss: A Correlational Study of the 'loss' Meme Popularity and Amazon's Revenue. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Internet Culture and Commerce


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Shipping the Loss: A Correlational Study of the 'loss' Meme Popularity and Amazon's Revenue with an abstract of This study delves into the unforeseen connection between the rising popularity of the 'loss' meme and the fluctuations in Amazon's shipping revenue. Using data from Google Trends and Statista, our research team analyzed the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Surprisingly, a strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9767526 was discovered, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2016. This paper explores the implications of this unexpected relationship and delves into the potential impact of internet memes on e-commerce. We highlight the importance of considering cultural trends in understanding consumer behavior and urge further investigation into the influence of memes on economic indicators.

ChatGPT:

'loss' meme popularity, Amazon revenue correlation, 'loss' meme Google Trends, Statista data analysis, internet memes impact on e-commerce, cultural trends consumer behavior, influence of memes on economic indicators

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the 'loss' meme
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'loss meme' (without quotes, in the United States)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.

See what else correlates with Popularity of the 'loss' meme

Amazon's shipping revenue in millions of dollars
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Amazon's shipping revenue in millions of dollars

Correlation r = 0.9767526 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9540457 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Amazon's shipping revenue in millions of dollars) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the 'loss' meme) over the 10 years from 2007 through 2016.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.2E-6. 0.0000012425290982117873000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 0.00012% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 804,810 random variables You don't actually need 804 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.9, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2007200820092010201120122013201420152016
Popularity of the 'loss' meme (Relative popularity)0.1250.22222200.4444440.511.416672.755.510
Amazon's shipping revenue in millions of dollars (Dollars)7400000008350000009240000001193000000155200000022800000003097000000448600000065200000008976000000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.125,0.222222,0,0.444444,0.5,1,1.41667,2.75,5.5,10,])
array_2 = np.array([740000000,835000000,924000000,1193000000,1552000000,2280000000,3097000000,4486000000,6520000000,8976000000,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the 'loss' meme"
array_2_name = "Amazon's shipping revenue in millions of dollars"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 5752 · Black Variable ID: 25165 · Red Variable ID: 172
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0