about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,707 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Pearl and the second variable is Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Vermont.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the name Pearl gained popularity, more and more people were drawn to its lustrous charm. It's as if they were all casting their votes into the ocean of electoral options, hoping to find that elusive political treasure. The connection between the two may seem shellfish at first, but perhaps there's a libertarian lobe in the brain that's activated by the iridescence of the name. It's all just a pearlytical party at the polls!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a bustling town square in Vermont, captured in a Polaroid photo. In the center of the square, a large banner displays the name "Pearl" in elegant, shimmering letters that catch the sunlight. People gather around, each holding a voting slip in hand, ready to cast their votes. The atmosphere is filled with excitement as individuals eagerly drop their ballots into a giant, sparkling treasure chest, symbolizing the electoral options. Among the crowd, a group of supporters proudly hold signs for the Libertarian Presidential candidate, their enthusiasm reflected in the glimmer of their iridescent stickers. The scene is a delightful fusion of the irresistible allure of the name Pearl and the fervor for the Libertarian candidate, creating a pearlytical party at the polls. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Pearl and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Vermont. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Brutalism Celtic art Sci-fi fantacy a Polaroid photo Steampunk
ChatGPT: a Polaroid photo

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Pearl and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Vermont, in the following situation: As the name Pearl gained popularity, more and more people were drawn to its lustrous charm. It's as if they were all casting their votes into the ocean of electoral options, hoping to find that elusive political treasure. The connection between the two may seem shellfish at first, but perhaps there's a libertarian lobe in the brain that's activated by the iridescence of the name. It's all just a pearlytical party at the polls!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling town square in Vermont, a large banner proudly displays the name "Pearl" in elegant, shimmering letters that catch the sunlight. As people gather around, each person holds a voting slip in hand, ready to cast their votes. The atmosphere is filled with excitement as individuals eagerly drop their ballots into a giant, sparkling treasure chest, symbolizing the electoral options. Among the crowd, a group of supporters proudly hold signs for the Libertarian Presidential candidate, their enthusiasm reflected in the glimmer of their iridescent stickers. The scene is a delightful fusion of the irresistible allure of the name Pearl and the fervor for the Libertarian candidate, creating a pearlytical party at the polls.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a Polaroid photo ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling town square in Vermont, a large banner proudly displays the name "Pearl" in elegant, shimmering letters that catch the sunlight. As people gather around, each person holds a voting slip in hand, ready to cast their votes. The atmosphere is filled with excitement as individuals eagerly drop their ballots into a giant, sparkling treasure chest, symbolizing the electoral options. Among the crowd, a group of supporters proudly hold signs for the Libertarian Presidential candidate, their enthusiasm reflected in the glimmer of their iridescent stickers. The scene is a delightful fusion of the irresistible allure of the name Pearl and the fervor for the Libertarian candidate, creating a pearlytical party at the polls. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a bustling town square in Vermont, captured in a Polaroid photo. In the center of the square, a large banner displays the name "Pearl" in elegant, shimmering letters that catch the sunlight. People gather around, each holding a voting slip in hand, ready to cast their votes. The atmosphere is filled with excitement as individuals eagerly drop their ballots into a giant, sparkling treasure chest, symbolizing the electoral options. Among the crowd, a group of supporters proudly hold signs for the Libertarian Presidential candidate, their enthusiasm reflected in the glimmer of their iridescent stickers. The scene is a delightful fusion of the irresistible allure of the name Pearl and the fervor for the Libertarian candidate, creating a pearlytical party at the polls.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Pearl caused Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Vermont to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Shining Bright: The Inspirational Might of Pearl and the Libertarian Vote in Vermont

Journal of Quirky Political Perspectives

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Pearl and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Vermont. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9027498 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Shining Bright: The Inspirational Might of Pearl and the Libertarian Vote in Vermont

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unique relationship between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the picturesque state of Vermont. Through a harmonious fusion of US Social Security Administration data and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's collection from the Harvard Dataverse, we present compelling evidence of a correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9027498 with a p-value < 0.01 for the period spanning 1980 to 2020. It's almost as if Pearl's luminosity brings out the libertarian leanings! The results are so convincing, they might just be considered a "pearl of wisdom" for future electoral analyses. This study showcases the fascinating interplay between nomenclature and political preferences, shedding light on a facet of social dynamics that has been largely overlooked. We invite readers to dive into the luminescent world of Pearl and the libertarian vote, and perhaps gain a newfound appreciation for the impact of seemingly whimsical variables in the political arena. So, who knew that a name could have such a shining influence on the electoral landscape?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Pearl and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Vermont. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shining Bright: The Inspirational Might of Pearl and the Libertarian Vote in Vermont

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unique relationship between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the picturesque state of Vermont. Through a harmonious fusion of US Social Security Administration data and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's collection from the Harvard Dataverse, we present compelling evidence of a correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9027498 with a p-value < 0.01 for the period spanning 1980 to 2020. It's almost as if Pearl's luminosity brings out the libertarian leanings! The results are so convincing, they might just be considered a "pearl of wisdom" for future electoral analyses. This study showcases the fascinating interplay between nomenclature and political preferences, shedding light on a facet of social dynamics that has been largely overlooked. We invite readers to dive into the luminescent world of Pearl and the libertarian vote, and perhaps gain a newfound appreciation for the impact of seemingly whimsical variables in the political arena. So, who knew that a name could have such a shining influence on the electoral landscape?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between individual names and political leanings has long been an intriguing area of study, prompting researchers to explore the potential influence of nomenclature on voting behavior. Although seemingly whimsical, this line of investigation has repeatedly yielded captivating insights, often juxtaposing the ordinary with the extraordinary. In this vein, our study delves into the captivating union of the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and the votes cast for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the rustic realm of Vermont.

Dad Joke Alert: Who knew that a name could contain so much political "luster"?

The state of Vermont, renowned for its scenic landscapes and progressive ethos, serves as an ideal backdrop for unraveling the entwined tale of Pearl and libertarian preferences. Our analysis leverages data from the US Social Security Administration, allowing us to track the prevalence of the name "Pearl" over several decades. This comprehensive dataset enables us to witness the ebb and flow of Pearl's popularity, akin to a captivating oceanic metaphor. The effect of Pearl's captivating allure on the electoral landscape unfolds through the lens of the votes garnered by Libertarian candidates in Vermont's presidential elections.

Dad Joke Alert: It's as if Pearl's influence is akin to an electoral "treasure"!

As we embark on this scholarly expedition, it is imperative to note the broader implications of our investigation. By gazing into the intriguing intersection of individual nomenclature and political preference, we endeavor to shed light on a facet of sociopolitical dynamics previously concealed in the shadows. The serendipitous alignment of Pearl's radiance with libertarian inclinations opens a proverbial Pandora's box, revealing the multidimensional tapestry of factors that shape electoral behavior. Thus, our study seeks to elevate the discourse surrounding the latent impact of seemingly inconspicuous variables in the electoral landscape, inviting readers to ponder the profound implications of our findings.

Dad Joke Alert: The correlation between Pearl and libertarian votes is like finding a hidden "gem" in the electoral realm!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Pearl and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Vermont. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shining Bright: The Inspirational Might of Pearl and the Libertarian Vote in Vermont

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unique relationship between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the picturesque state of Vermont. Through a harmonious fusion of US Social Security Administration data and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's collection from the Harvard Dataverse, we present compelling evidence of a correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9027498 with a p-value < 0.01 for the period spanning 1980 to 2020. It's almost as if Pearl's luminosity brings out the libertarian leanings! The results are so convincing, they might just be considered a "pearl of wisdom" for future electoral analyses. This study showcases the fascinating interplay between nomenclature and political preferences, shedding light on a facet of social dynamics that has been largely overlooked. We invite readers to dive into the luminescent world of Pearl and the libertarian vote, and perhaps gain a newfound appreciation for the impact of seemingly whimsical variables in the political arena. So, who knew that a name could have such a shining influence on the electoral landscape?

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between individual names and political leanings has long been an intriguing area of study, prompting researchers to explore the potential influence of nomenclature on voting behavior. Although seemingly whimsical, this line of investigation has repeatedly yielded captivating insights, often juxtaposing the ordinary with the extraordinary. In this vein, our study delves into the captivating union of the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and the votes cast for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the rustic realm of Vermont.
Dad Joke Alert: Who knew that a name could contain so much political "luster"?
The state of Vermont, renowned for its scenic landscapes and progressive ethos, serves as an ideal backdrop for unraveling the entwined tale of Pearl and libertarian preferences. Our analysis leverages data from the US Social Security Administration, allowing us to track the prevalence of the name "Pearl" over several decades. This comprehensive dataset enables us to witness the ebb and flow of Pearl's popularity, akin to a captivating oceanic metaphor. The effect of Pearl's captivating allure on the electoral landscape unfolds through the lens of the votes garnered by Libertarian candidates in Vermont's presidential elections.
Dad Joke Alert: It's as if Pearl's influence is akin to an electoral "treasure"!
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, it is imperative to note the broader implications of our investigation. By gazing into the intriguing intersection of individual nomenclature and political preference, we endeavor to shed light on a facet of sociopolitical dynamics previously concealed in the shadows. The serendipitous alignment of Pearl's radiance with libertarian inclinations opens a proverbial Pandora's box, revealing the multidimensional tapestry of factors that shape electoral behavior. Thus, our study seeks to elevate the discourse surrounding the latent impact of seemingly inconspicuous variables in the electoral landscape, inviting readers to ponder the profound implications of our findings.
Dad Joke Alert: The correlation between Pearl and libertarian votes is like finding a hidden "gem" in the electoral realm!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Empirical investigations into the potential influence of nomenclature on voting behavior have long captivated the scholarly community. Smith and Doe (2010) conducted a meticulous analysis of the relationship between given names and electoral preferences, revealing thought-provoking patterns that challenge conventional wisdom. Their seminal work laid the groundwork for subsequent studies, prompting a reevaluation of the role of nomenclature in shaping political inclinations.

To add a touch of whimsy to the literature, let us not forget that a name can truly "rock" the vote. The interplay between nomenclature and electoral behavior may seem like a "gem" of an area for investigation, but as we delve into the abyss of data, we find these connections to be more than just "pearly" speculative.

Jones (2015) examined the impact of unconventional given names on voter perceptions and political affiliations, opening a proverbial treasure trove of insights into the psychological underpinnings of nomenclatural symbolism. The notion that a name carries a certain "weight" in the political arena is not without significance and may prove to be a "gem" of importance in illuminating the murky waters of electoral dynamics.

Turning our attention to non-fiction literature, books such as "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner shed light on how seemingly inconspicuous variables can exert profound influences on societal phenomena. In a similar vein, Gladwell's "The Tipping Point" explores the "tipping" dynamics that propel seemingly trivial elements into powerful drivers of social change. These works serve as a poignant reminder that even the most unlikely factors can bear substantial weight in shaping human behavior, perhaps even more than a "Pearl" of wisdom.

On the fictional front, works such as "The Name of the Rose" by Umberto Eco and "The Pearl" by John Steinbeck offer imaginative narratives that underscore the mysterious allure and symbolism associated with names. While these texts may not directly address the intersection of nomenclature and electoral preferences, they infuse a sense of mystique into our exploration, much like the enigmatic influence of a "Pearl" on libertarian votes.

In the realm of cinema, movies such as "The Truman Show" and "Election" offer tantalizing glimpses into the complexities of human behavior and the hidden forces that shape our decisions. While these filmic creations may not explicitly touch upon the specific interplay of names and political leanings in Vermont, they remind us of the intricate web of influences that underpin electoral dynamics and perhaps inspire us to look for the "Pearl" of truth hidden amidst the complexities of human psychology.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Pearl and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Vermont. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1980 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shining Bright: The Inspirational Might of Pearl and the Libertarian Vote in Vermont

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unique relationship between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the picturesque state of Vermont. Through a harmonious fusion of US Social Security Administration data and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's collection from the Harvard Dataverse, we present compelling evidence of a correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9027498 with a p-value < 0.01 for the period spanning 1980 to 2020. It's almost as if Pearl's luminosity brings out the libertarian leanings! The results are so convincing, they might just be considered a "pearl of wisdom" for future electoral analyses. This study showcases the fascinating interplay between nomenclature and political preferences, shedding light on a facet of social dynamics that has been largely overlooked. We invite readers to dive into the luminescent world of Pearl and the libertarian vote, and perhaps gain a newfound appreciation for the impact of seemingly whimsical variables in the political arena. So, who knew that a name could have such a shining influence on the electoral landscape?

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between individual names and political leanings has long been an intriguing area of study, prompting researchers to explore the potential influence of nomenclature on voting behavior. Although seemingly whimsical, this line of investigation has repeatedly yielded captivating insights, often juxtaposing the ordinary with the extraordinary. In this vein, our study delves into the captivating union of the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and the votes cast for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the rustic realm of Vermont.
Dad Joke Alert: Who knew that a name could contain so much political "luster"?
The state of Vermont, renowned for its scenic landscapes and progressive ethos, serves as an ideal backdrop for unraveling the entwined tale of Pearl and libertarian preferences. Our analysis leverages data from the US Social Security Administration, allowing us to track the prevalence of the name "Pearl" over several decades. This comprehensive dataset enables us to witness the ebb and flow of Pearl's popularity, akin to a captivating oceanic metaphor. The effect of Pearl's captivating allure on the electoral landscape unfolds through the lens of the votes garnered by Libertarian candidates in Vermont's presidential elections.
Dad Joke Alert: It's as if Pearl's influence is akin to an electoral "treasure"!
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, it is imperative to note the broader implications of our investigation. By gazing into the intriguing intersection of individual nomenclature and political preference, we endeavor to shed light on a facet of sociopolitical dynamics previously concealed in the shadows. The serendipitous alignment of Pearl's radiance with libertarian inclinations opens a proverbial Pandora's box, revealing the multidimensional tapestry of factors that shape electoral behavior. Thus, our study seeks to elevate the discourse surrounding the latent impact of seemingly inconspicuous variables in the electoral landscape, inviting readers to ponder the profound implications of our findings.
Dad Joke Alert: The correlation between Pearl and libertarian votes is like finding a hidden "gem" in the electoral realm!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to uncover the enchanting association between the prevalence of the first name "Pearl" and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the bucolic state of Vermont, a meticulous and comprehensive methodology was employed. The data used for this investigation were primarily sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's collection from the Harvard Dataverse. The period under consideration spans from 1980 to 2020, encompassing multiple presidential election cycles and offering a robust foundation for our analytical pursuits.

Our first step involved accessing the US Social Security Administration's extensive database to procure data on the frequency of the first name "Pearl" across the given timeframe. The extraction and organization of this dataset mirrored a meticulous process reminiscent of the careful curation of a precious collection—a fitting metaphor considering the illuminating nature of our subject matter. This information was then juxtaposed with the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's repository, which provided detailed records of the votes cast for Libertarian presidential candidates in the idyllic state of Vermont.

Leveraging our proprietary algorithm, affectionately dubbed the "Pearly Gates Analysis," we set out to unravel the temporal patterns and potential correlations between the popularity of the name "Pearl" and the votes accrued by Libertarian presidential candidates in Vermont. This algorithm, as its name suggests, paved the way for us to gain insights into the celestial connection between nomenclature and political inclinations, offering a glimpse into the paradisiacal juxtaposition of seemingly incongruous variables.

The statistical analyses were conducted using state-of-the-art software, with robust methodologies such as correlation analysis and regression modeling formulating the crux of our investigatory framework. The intention behind these analytical techniques was to not only discern potential associations but also to gauge the magnitude and direction of the relationship between the prevalence of the name "Pearl" and the Libertarian vote share in Vermont. These analyses were performed with an air of scholarly precision, mirroring a delicate dance of statistical significance—much like the graceful movements of a pearl within an oyster's embrace.

Furthermore, to bolster the reliability and robustness of our findings, various sensitivity analyses were conducted to ensure the stability and consistency of the observed associations. Sensitivity analyses, akin to the meticulous examination of a pearl's luster under varying light conditions, allowed us to evaluate the resilience of our results and ascertain their veracity in the face of diverse methodological assumptions and specifications.

Continuing with a solemn approach, our methodology also involved controlling for potential confounding factors such as demographic shifts, socio-political dynamics, and electoral peculiarities unique to the state of Vermont. Through this meticulous process of covariate adjustment, we endeavored to isolate the genuine influence of the name "Pearl" on libertarian voting patterns, safeguarding our analyses from spurious associations and ensuring the robustness of our conclusions.

Adding a pinch of whimsy to our methodological arsenal, we employed an innovative approach that involved infusing the research process with charm, akin to the alluring qualities of its eponymous name. This broader methodological embellishment was aptly labeled the "Pearlescent Paradigm," which sought to capture the captivating essence of our subject matter while maintaining the rigors of scientific inquiry. It's not every day that a research methodology can be described as "iridescent."

In summary, our methodological framework stood as a testament to the fusion of scholarly rigor and intellectual playfulness, mirroring the complex interplay between the captivating allure of the name "Pearl" and the intricate dynamics of electoral behavior in the picturesque realm of Vermont. Through a judicious integration of data sources, statistical tools, and methodological innovations, our study aimed to unveil the enigmatic bond between nomenclature and political preference, exuding a scholarly radiance that might just rival the luminosity of its titular inspiration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Pearl and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Vermont. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1980 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9027498, r-squared of 0.8149572, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shining Bright: The Inspirational Might of Pearl and the Libertarian Vote in Vermont

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unique relationship between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the picturesque state of Vermont. Through a harmonious fusion of US Social Security Administration data and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's collection from the Harvard Dataverse, we present compelling evidence of a correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9027498 with a p-value < 0.01 for the period spanning 1980 to 2020. It's almost as if Pearl's luminosity brings out the libertarian leanings! The results are so convincing, they might just be considered a "pearl of wisdom" for future electoral analyses. This study showcases the fascinating interplay between nomenclature and political preferences, shedding light on a facet of social dynamics that has been largely overlooked. We invite readers to dive into the luminescent world of Pearl and the libertarian vote, and perhaps gain a newfound appreciation for the impact of seemingly whimsical variables in the political arena. So, who knew that a name could have such a shining influence on the electoral landscape?

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between individual names and political leanings has long been an intriguing area of study, prompting researchers to explore the potential influence of nomenclature on voting behavior. Although seemingly whimsical, this line of investigation has repeatedly yielded captivating insights, often juxtaposing the ordinary with the extraordinary. In this vein, our study delves into the captivating union of the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and the votes cast for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the rustic realm of Vermont.
Dad Joke Alert: Who knew that a name could contain so much political "luster"?
The state of Vermont, renowned for its scenic landscapes and progressive ethos, serves as an ideal backdrop for unraveling the entwined tale of Pearl and libertarian preferences. Our analysis leverages data from the US Social Security Administration, allowing us to track the prevalence of the name "Pearl" over several decades. This comprehensive dataset enables us to witness the ebb and flow of Pearl's popularity, akin to a captivating oceanic metaphor. The effect of Pearl's captivating allure on the electoral landscape unfolds through the lens of the votes garnered by Libertarian candidates in Vermont's presidential elections.
Dad Joke Alert: It's as if Pearl's influence is akin to an electoral "treasure"!
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, it is imperative to note the broader implications of our investigation. By gazing into the intriguing intersection of individual nomenclature and political preference, we endeavor to shed light on a facet of sociopolitical dynamics previously concealed in the shadows. The serendipitous alignment of Pearl's radiance with libertarian inclinations opens a proverbial Pandora's box, revealing the multidimensional tapestry of factors that shape electoral behavior. Thus, our study seeks to elevate the discourse surrounding the latent impact of seemingly inconspicuous variables in the electoral landscape, inviting readers to ponder the profound implications of our findings.
Dad Joke Alert: The correlation between Pearl and libertarian votes is like finding a hidden "gem" in the electoral realm!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's collection from the Harvard Dataverse revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and the votes received by the Libertarian presidential candidate in Vermont over the period of 1980 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.9027498 indicates a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This finding implies that as the popularity of the name "Pearl" increased or decreased, there was a corresponding increase or decrease in votes for the Libertarian candidate in Vermont. It's as though "Pearl" brings out the "liber-pearl-tarian" leanings in Vermont's electorate!

The high coefficient of determination (r-squared = 0.8149572) further underscores the strength of the relationship, indicating that approximately 81.5% of the variation in Libertarian votes can be explained by the variation in the popularity of the name "Pearl." This effect is quite pronounced, as if the influential properties of Pearl extend beyond mere tokenism to actively shape political predilections. In simple terms, it seems that the presence of "Pearl" is akin to having a "libertarian charm" in Vermont.

The statistical significance of the relationship is reinforced by the p-value of less than 0.01, providing strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis that there is no relationship between the popularity of the name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Vermont. This brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "pearls of wisdom," as these findings offer valuable insights into the intersection of nomenclature and political behavior.

In support of these numerical findings, the scatterplot in Figure 1 vividly illustrates the strong positive correlation between the two variables, with the data points clustering along a discernible upward trend. It's almost as if the figure itself is a visual representation of the "luminous" effect of Pearl on libertarian votes in Vermont.

This study's findings shed light on a fascinating and previously unexplored dimension of electoral dynamics, effectively surfacing the latent influence of a seemingly inconspicuous variable in shaping political preferences. Such an unexpected revelation serves as a reminder of the inherent complexity of human behavior and the encompassing impact of seemingly trivial factors. After all, who would have thought that a name could hold such brilliance in the realm of political choice?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Pearl and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Vermont. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Shining Bright: The Inspirational Might of Pearl and the Libertarian Vote in Vermont

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unique relationship between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the picturesque state of Vermont. Through a harmonious fusion of US Social Security Administration data and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's collection from the Harvard Dataverse, we present compelling evidence of a correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9027498 with a p-value < 0.01 for the period spanning 1980 to 2020. It's almost as if Pearl's luminosity brings out the libertarian leanings! The results are so convincing, they might just be considered a "pearl of wisdom" for future electoral analyses. This study showcases the fascinating interplay between nomenclature and political preferences, shedding light on a facet of social dynamics that has been largely overlooked. We invite readers to dive into the luminescent world of Pearl and the libertarian vote, and perhaps gain a newfound appreciation for the impact of seemingly whimsical variables in the political arena. So, who knew that a name could have such a shining influence on the electoral landscape?

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Empirical investigations into the potential influence of nomenclature on voting behavior have long captivated the scholarly community. Smith and Doe (2010) conducted a meticulous analysis of the relationship between given names and electoral preferences, revealing thought-provoking patterns that challenge conventional wisdom. Their seminal work laid the groundwork for subsequent studies, prompting a reevaluation of the role of nomenclature in shaping political inclinations.
To add a touch of whimsy to the literature, let us not forget that a name can truly "rock" the vote. The interplay between nomenclature and electoral behavior may seem like a "gem" of an area for investigation, but as we delve into the abyss of data, we find these connections to be more than just "pearly" speculative.
Jones (2015) examined the impact of unconventional given names on voter perceptions and political affiliations, opening a proverbial treasure trove of insights into the psychological underpinnings of nomenclatural symbolism. The notion that a name carries a certain "weight" in the political arena is not without significance and may prove to be a "gem" of importance in illuminating the murky waters of electoral dynamics.
Turning our attention to non-fiction literature, books such as "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner shed light on how seemingly inconspicuous variables can exert profound influences on societal phenomena. In a similar vein, Gladwell's "The Tipping Point" explores the "tipping" dynamics that propel seemingly trivial elements into powerful drivers of social change. These works serve as a poignant reminder that even the most unlikely factors can bear substantial weight in shaping human behavior, perhaps even more than a "Pearl" of wisdom.
On the fictional front, works such as "The Name of the Rose" by Umberto Eco and "The Pearl" by John Steinbeck offer imaginative narratives that underscore the mysterious allure and symbolism associated with names. While these texts may not directly address the intersection of nomenclature and electoral preferences, they infuse a sense of mystique into our exploration, much like the enigmatic influence of a "Pearl" on libertarian votes.
In the realm of cinema, movies such as "The Truman Show" and "Election" offer tantalizing glimpses into the complexities of human behavior and the hidden forces that shape our decisions. While these filmic creations may not explicitly touch upon the specific interplay of names and political leanings in Vermont, they remind us of the intricate web of influences that underpin electoral dynamics and perhaps inspire us to look for the "Pearl" of truth hidden amidst the complexities of human psychology.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's collection from the Harvard Dataverse revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and the votes received by the Libertarian presidential candidate in Vermont over the period of 1980 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.9027498 indicates a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This finding implies that as the popularity of the name "Pearl" increased or decreased, there was a corresponding increase or decrease in votes for the Libertarian candidate in Vermont. It's as though "Pearl" brings out the "liber-pearl-tarian" leanings in Vermont's electorate!
The high coefficient of determination (r-squared = 0.8149572) further underscores the strength of the relationship, indicating that approximately 81.5% of the variation in Libertarian votes can be explained by the variation in the popularity of the name "Pearl." This effect is quite pronounced, as if the influential properties of Pearl extend beyond mere tokenism to actively shape political predilections. In simple terms, it seems that the presence of "Pearl" is akin to having a "libertarian charm" in Vermont.
The statistical significance of the relationship is reinforced by the p-value of less than 0.01, providing strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis that there is no relationship between the popularity of the name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Vermont. This brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "pearls of wisdom," as these findings offer valuable insights into the intersection of nomenclature and political behavior.
In support of these numerical findings, the scatterplot in Figure 1 vividly illustrates the strong positive correlation between the two variables, with the data points clustering along a discernible upward trend. It's almost as if the figure itself is a visual representation of the "luminous" effect of Pearl on libertarian votes in Vermont.
This study's findings shed light on a fascinating and previously unexplored dimension of electoral dynamics, effectively surfacing the latent influence of a seemingly inconspicuous variable in shaping political preferences. Such an unexpected revelation serves as a reminder of the inherent complexity of human behavior and the encompassing impact of seemingly trivial factors. After all, who would have thought that a name could hold such brilliance in the realm of political choice?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

In the context of our findings, it becomes clear that the influence of the first name "Pearl" extends beyond mere nomenclature, exerting a substantial impact on the electoral preferences of Vermont's inhabitants. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9027498, significant at p < 0.01, serves as incontrovertible evidence of the considerable interplay between the popularity of this luminous name and the votes received by the Libertarian presidential candidate. As the old saying goes, "A Pearl by any other name would still correlate with Libertarian votes!"

The results of our study align with prior research by Smith and Doe (2010), who laid the groundwork for examining the relationship between given names and electoral preferences. Similarly, Jones' (2015) exploration of unconventional given names on voter perceptions and political affiliations resonates with our findings, affirming the potential weight carried by nomenclature in the political arena. It seems that the impact of a name on political leanings is not to be trifled with, proving that there truly is a "gem" of importance in the field of nomenclature and its influence on electoral dynamics.

Moreover, our results echo the underlying philosophy of Levitt and Dubner's "Freakonomics," highlighting the profound influence of seemingly inconspicuous variables on societal phenomena. In a similar vein, the reflections in Gladwell’s "The Tipping Point" pertaining to the dynamics that propel seemingly trivial elements into powerful drivers of social change find resonance in our unexpected revelation about the role of a name in shaping political behavior. Indeed, uncovering the correlation between the popularity of "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian candidate serves as a testament to the potentially formidable impact of seemingly whimsical variables in the political landscape. Who would have thought that a name could harbor such substantial influence, shining a "Pearl" of light on the complexities of voter behavior?

Our findings offer a "luminous" contribution to the understanding of electoral dynamics, demonstrating the unforeseen influence of a seemingly trivial variable on political preferences. As we eagerly anticipate future research to further illuminate the mechanisms underpinning this striking relationship, it is undeniable that the influence of "Pearl" on Vermont's libertarian votes is a "gem" worthy of sustained scholarly attention. After all, who would have thought that a name could hold such brilliance in the realm of political choice?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Pearl and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Vermont. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Shining Bright: The Inspirational Might of Pearl and the Libertarian Vote in Vermont

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unique relationship between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the picturesque state of Vermont. Through a harmonious fusion of US Social Security Administration data and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's collection from the Harvard Dataverse, we present compelling evidence of a correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9027498 with a p-value < 0.01 for the period spanning 1980 to 2020. It's almost as if Pearl's luminosity brings out the libertarian leanings! The results are so convincing, they might just be considered a "pearl of wisdom" for future electoral analyses. This study showcases the fascinating interplay between nomenclature and political preferences, shedding light on a facet of social dynamics that has been largely overlooked. We invite readers to dive into the luminescent world of Pearl and the libertarian vote, and perhaps gain a newfound appreciation for the impact of seemingly whimsical variables in the political arena. So, who knew that a name could have such a shining influence on the electoral landscape?

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between individual names and political leanings has long been an intriguing area of study, prompting researchers to explore the potential influence of nomenclature on voting behavior. Although seemingly whimsical, this line of investigation has repeatedly yielded captivating insights, often juxtaposing the ordinary with the extraordinary. In this vein, our study delves into the captivating union of the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and the votes cast for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the rustic realm of Vermont.
Dad Joke Alert: Who knew that a name could contain so much political "luster"?
The state of Vermont, renowned for its scenic landscapes and progressive ethos, serves as an ideal backdrop for unraveling the entwined tale of Pearl and libertarian preferences. Our analysis leverages data from the US Social Security Administration, allowing us to track the prevalence of the name "Pearl" over several decades. This comprehensive dataset enables us to witness the ebb and flow of Pearl's popularity, akin to a captivating oceanic metaphor. The effect of Pearl's captivating allure on the electoral landscape unfolds through the lens of the votes garnered by Libertarian candidates in Vermont's presidential elections.
Dad Joke Alert: It's as if Pearl's influence is akin to an electoral "treasure"!
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, it is imperative to note the broader implications of our investigation. By gazing into the intriguing intersection of individual nomenclature and political preference, we endeavor to shed light on a facet of sociopolitical dynamics previously concealed in the shadows. The serendipitous alignment of Pearl's radiance with libertarian inclinations opens a proverbial Pandora's box, revealing the multidimensional tapestry of factors that shape electoral behavior. Thus, our study seeks to elevate the discourse surrounding the latent impact of seemingly inconspicuous variables in the electoral landscape, inviting readers to ponder the profound implications of our findings.
Dad Joke Alert: The correlation between Pearl and libertarian votes is like finding a hidden "gem" in the electoral realm!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's collection from the Harvard Dataverse revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and the votes received by the Libertarian presidential candidate in Vermont over the period of 1980 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.9027498 indicates a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This finding implies that as the popularity of the name "Pearl" increased or decreased, there was a corresponding increase or decrease in votes for the Libertarian candidate in Vermont. It's as though "Pearl" brings out the "liber-pearl-tarian" leanings in Vermont's electorate!
The high coefficient of determination (r-squared = 0.8149572) further underscores the strength of the relationship, indicating that approximately 81.5% of the variation in Libertarian votes can be explained by the variation in the popularity of the name "Pearl." This effect is quite pronounced, as if the influential properties of Pearl extend beyond mere tokenism to actively shape political predilections. In simple terms, it seems that the presence of "Pearl" is akin to having a "libertarian charm" in Vermont.
The statistical significance of the relationship is reinforced by the p-value of less than 0.01, providing strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis that there is no relationship between the popularity of the name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Vermont. This brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "pearls of wisdom," as these findings offer valuable insights into the intersection of nomenclature and political behavior.
In support of these numerical findings, the scatterplot in Figure 1 vividly illustrates the strong positive correlation between the two variables, with the data points clustering along a discernible upward trend. It's almost as if the figure itself is a visual representation of the "luminous" effect of Pearl on libertarian votes in Vermont.
This study's findings shed light on a fascinating and previously unexplored dimension of electoral dynamics, effectively surfacing the latent influence of a seemingly inconspicuous variable in shaping political preferences. Such an unexpected revelation serves as a reminder of the inherent complexity of human behavior and the encompassing impact of seemingly trivial factors. After all, who would have thought that a name could hold such brilliance in the realm of political choice?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, this study has showcased a compelling correlation between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Vermont. The remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9027498 with a p-value < 0.01 for the period spanning 1980 to 2020 illuminates the captivating influence of this seemingly whimsical variable on political preferences. It's as though the name "Pearl" casts a libertarian spell on Vermont's electoral landscape, leading to an illuminating revelation of the hidden power of nomenclature in the political arena.

Dad Joke Alert: Looks like Vermont's political landscape has truly found its "pearl" of influence!

The high coefficient of determination further strengthens the validity of this relationship, indicating that a substantial proportion of the variation in Libertarian votes can be ascribed to the ebb and flow of Pearl's popularity. It's almost as if the name "Pearl" holds a timeless libertarian charm, consistently swaying the electorate in Vermont for over four decades.

Dad Joke Alert: Who would have thought that statistical analysis could uncover such a "liber-treasure-ian" element in the electoral process!

It is evident that this research has brought to light a previously overlooked facet of electoral dynamics, highlighting the profound impact of ostensibly inconspicuous variables on political decision-making. As such, our findings not only offer valuable insights into the interplay between names and political preferences but also invite further contemplation on the multifaceted nature of human behavior within the electoral sphere.

With these results in mind, it is the firm conclusion of this study that further investigation into the interconnection between names and political preferences, particularly in the context of other geographical regions and political affiliations, is unwarranted. The luminous influence of "Pearl" in shaping libertarian votes in Vermont has been well and truly illuminated, leaving little room for additional exploration in this particular domain.

Dad Joke Alert: It seems that this research has truly uncovered the "pearl" of wisdom in the sea of electoral analysis!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Shining Bright: The Inspirational Might of Pearl and the Libertarian Vote in Vermont. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Quirky Political Perspectives


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Shining Bright: The Inspirational Might of Pearl and the Libertarian Vote in Vermont. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Ethereal Studies and Cosmic Connections


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Shining Bright: The Inspirational Might of Pearl and the Libertarian Vote in Vermont with an abstract of This study delves into the unique relationship between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the picturesque state of Vermont. Through a harmonious fusion of US Social Security Administration data and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's collection from the Harvard Dataverse, we present compelling evidence of a correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9027498 with a p-value < 0.01 for the period spanning 1980 to 2020. It's almost as if Pearl's luminosity brings out the libertarian leanings! The results are so convincing, they might just be considered a "pearl of wisdom" for future electoral analyses. This study showcases the fascinating interplay between nomenclature and political preferences, shedding light on a facet of social dynamics that has been largely overlooked. We invite readers to dive into the luminescent world of Pearl and the libertarian vote, and perhaps gain a newfound appreciation for the impact of seemingly whimsical variables in the political arena. So, who knew that a name could have such a shining influence on the electoral landscape?

ChatGPT:

"Pearl name popularity, Libertarian vote Vermont, US Social Security Administration data, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, correlation coefficient, political preferences, social dynamics, electoral analysis"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Pearl
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Pearl
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Pearl

Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Vermont
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Vermont
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Vermont

Correlation r = 0.9027498 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8149572 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Vermont) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Pearl) over the 11 years from 1980 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00014. 0.0001416853323419326800000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 0.014% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 7,058 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.66, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19801984198819921996200020042008201220162020
Popularity of the first name Pearl (Babies born)174169148157175200196259368549351
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Vermont (Percentage of votes)0.8907680.4271810.4109680.1729370.4577310.2663880.3528560.3282611.165093.144790.972591




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([174,169,148,157,175,200,196,259,368,549,351,])
array_2 = np.array([0.890768,0.427181,0.410968,0.172937,0.457731,0.266388,0.352856,0.328261,1.16509,3.14479,0.972591,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Pearl"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Vermont"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 5707 · Black Variable ID: 3829 · Red Variable ID: 26179
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0