about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,696 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and the second variable is Kerosene used in Chad.  The chart goes from 2006 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the 'distracted boyfriend' meme gained traction, more and more people in Chad were using their smartphones and devices to view and share it. This led to a surge in demand for electricity, prompting the need for additional kerosene to power generators in certain areas. It's as if the meme set off a chain reaction, creating a spark in kerosene use in Chad!

Create a meme inspired by the distracted boyfriend meme that in some way references Kerosene used in Chad. Try to emulate the style of the meme - don’t violate the copyright, just make it look and feel like the original meme.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme caused Kerosene used in Chad to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Lighting Up the Internet: A Combustible Connection Between the 'Distracted Boyfriend' Meme and Kerosene Consumption in Chad

The Journal of Memetics and Combustion Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and Kerosene used in Chad. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9358605 and p < 0.01 for 2006 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Lighting Up the Internet: A Combustible Connection Between the 'Distracted Boyfriend' Meme and Kerosene Consumption in Chad"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unexpected relationship between the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and the consumption of kerosene in Chad. Using data sourced from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, we examined the correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9358605 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2006 to 2021. This surprising association calls for a closer examination of the societal influences on Internet memes and energy consumption in developing countries. The findings not only shed light on the societal impact of online trends but may also ignite further discussion on the broader implications of digital culture on real-world resource usage.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and Kerosene used in Chad. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Lighting Up the Internet: A Combustible Connection Between the 'Distracted Boyfriend' Meme and Kerosene Consumption in Chad"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unexpected relationship between the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and the consumption of kerosene in Chad. Using data sourced from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, we examined the correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9358605 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2006 to 2021. This surprising association calls for a closer examination of the societal influences on Internet memes and energy consumption in developing countries. The findings not only shed light on the societal impact of online trends but may also ignite further discussion on the broader implications of digital culture on real-world resource usage.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The intertwining of Internet culture and real-world phenomena has long been a topic of fascination, and in recent years, the influence of memes on societal trends has garnered increasing attention. One such meme that has captivated the digital realm is the "distracted boyfriend" meme, known for its ability to elicit both amusement and exasperation in equal measure. Meanwhile, in the realm of energy consumption, the use of kerosene in developing countries poses its own set of challenges and considerations, often overlooked in the midst of discussions about cleaner and more sustainable energy sources.

The unexpected nexus between the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and kerosene utilization in Chad represents an intriguing phenomenon that warrants closer investigation. While it may seem as improbable as a lab mouse becoming a math whiz, we were drawn to explore the potential relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Through the lens of statistics and data analysis, we sought to unravel the tangled web of influences that may underlie this unexpected correlation, and in doing so, highlight the peculiar and often surprising interplay of digital culture and real-world resource consumption.

Examining this unlikely union also serves to underscore the quirkiness of human behavior and the intricate web of correlations that can be unearthed when delving into the labyrinth of societal trends and global influences. The sheer serendipity of stumbling upon this association during our analysis was enough to ignite our curiosity and prompt us to delve deeper into the enigmatic realm of meme dynamics and energy utilization patterns. As we embark on this scholarly endeavor, we invite the reader to join us in unraveling this rather curious conundrum, where the worlds of Internet memes and kerosene usage collide in a manner akin to a dramatic plot twist in a scientific sitcom.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and Kerosene used in Chad. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Lighting Up the Internet: A Combustible Connection Between the 'Distracted Boyfriend' Meme and Kerosene Consumption in Chad"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unexpected relationship between the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and the consumption of kerosene in Chad. Using data sourced from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, we examined the correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9358605 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2006 to 2021. This surprising association calls for a closer examination of the societal influences on Internet memes and energy consumption in developing countries. The findings not only shed light on the societal impact of online trends but may also ignite further discussion on the broader implications of digital culture on real-world resource usage.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intertwining of Internet culture and real-world phenomena has long been a topic of fascination, and in recent years, the influence of memes on societal trends has garnered increasing attention. One such meme that has captivated the digital realm is the "distracted boyfriend" meme, known for its ability to elicit both amusement and exasperation in equal measure. Meanwhile, in the realm of energy consumption, the use of kerosene in developing countries poses its own set of challenges and considerations, often overlooked in the midst of discussions about cleaner and more sustainable energy sources.
The unexpected nexus between the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and kerosene utilization in Chad represents an intriguing phenomenon that warrants closer investigation. While it may seem as improbable as a lab mouse becoming a math whiz, we were drawn to explore the potential relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Through the lens of statistics and data analysis, we sought to unravel the tangled web of influences that may underlie this unexpected correlation, and in doing so, highlight the peculiar and often surprising interplay of digital culture and real-world resource consumption.
Examining this unlikely union also serves to underscore the quirkiness of human behavior and the intricate web of correlations that can be unearthed when delving into the labyrinth of societal trends and global influences. The sheer serendipity of stumbling upon this association during our analysis was enough to ignite our curiosity and prompt us to delve deeper into the enigmatic realm of meme dynamics and energy utilization patterns. As we embark on this scholarly endeavor, we invite the reader to join us in unraveling this rather curious conundrum, where the worlds of Internet memes and kerosene usage collide in a manner akin to a dramatic plot twist in a scientific sitcom.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature on the topic of the connection between the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and kerosene consumption in Chad is remarkably sparse, given the seemingly incongruent nature of these two phenomena. However, a number of sources have shed light on related subjects that offer tangential insight into the intricate web of influences that may underlie this curious correlation.

In "Digital Culture and Society," Smith and Doe explore the societal impact of online trends, shedding light on the intricate ways in which Internet memes permeate and shape popular discourse. Similarly, Jones delves into the realm of digital anthropology in "Online Communities and Social Influence," offering valuable perspectives on the dynamics of online culture and its surprising reverberations in the physical world.

Turning to the realm of energy consumption in developing countries, "Energy Challenges in the 21st Century" by Author and Co-Author provides a comprehensive overview of the usage of kerosene as a primary energy source in regions such as Chad. Furthermore, "Sustainable Development and Renewable Energy" by Acclaimed Writer encapsulates the ongoing discussions and challenges surrounding energy accessibility in the developing world.

Venturing into the fictitious realm, the literary works of renowned authors such as George Orwell's "1984" and Margaret Atwood's "The Handmaid's Tale" offer cautionary tales of societal control and manipulation, drawing parallels to the influential power of digital culture. Meanwhile, in the realm of humor and satire, Douglas Adams’ "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" presents a whimsical exploration of the absurdities of interconnectedness and the unexpected ramifications of seemingly inconsequential events.

In conducting this literature review, it is worth noting that our search extended beyond conventional academic sources to include an unconventional array of materials. Insights were also gleaned from perusing the back of shampoo bottles, investigative reports by amateur conspiracy theorists, and the musings of fortune cookies. While unconventional, these sources offered unexpected perspectives and, in some cases, surprisingly compelling arguments that contributed to our understanding of the curious intersection between Internet memes and kerosene utilization.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and Kerosene used in Chad. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2006 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Lighting Up the Internet: A Combustible Connection Between the 'Distracted Boyfriend' Meme and Kerosene Consumption in Chad"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unexpected relationship between the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and the consumption of kerosene in Chad. Using data sourced from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, we examined the correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9358605 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2006 to 2021. This surprising association calls for a closer examination of the societal influences on Internet memes and energy consumption in developing countries. The findings not only shed light on the societal impact of online trends but may also ignite further discussion on the broader implications of digital culture on real-world resource usage.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intertwining of Internet culture and real-world phenomena has long been a topic of fascination, and in recent years, the influence of memes on societal trends has garnered increasing attention. One such meme that has captivated the digital realm is the "distracted boyfriend" meme, known for its ability to elicit both amusement and exasperation in equal measure. Meanwhile, in the realm of energy consumption, the use of kerosene in developing countries poses its own set of challenges and considerations, often overlooked in the midst of discussions about cleaner and more sustainable energy sources.
The unexpected nexus between the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and kerosene utilization in Chad represents an intriguing phenomenon that warrants closer investigation. While it may seem as improbable as a lab mouse becoming a math whiz, we were drawn to explore the potential relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Through the lens of statistics and data analysis, we sought to unravel the tangled web of influences that may underlie this unexpected correlation, and in doing so, highlight the peculiar and often surprising interplay of digital culture and real-world resource consumption.
Examining this unlikely union also serves to underscore the quirkiness of human behavior and the intricate web of correlations that can be unearthed when delving into the labyrinth of societal trends and global influences. The sheer serendipity of stumbling upon this association during our analysis was enough to ignite our curiosity and prompt us to delve deeper into the enigmatic realm of meme dynamics and energy utilization patterns. As we embark on this scholarly endeavor, we invite the reader to join us in unraveling this rather curious conundrum, where the worlds of Internet memes and kerosene usage collide in a manner akin to a dramatic plot twist in a scientific sitcom.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The unprecedented correlation between the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and kerosene consumption in Chad prompted the rigorous development of an eclectic methodology to uncover the underlying dynamics at play. The confluence of internet meme fervor and kerosene utilization in a far-flung setting necessitated a multidisciplinary approach akin to a fusion dish concocted by an intrepid gastronome.

The primary source of data for meme popularity was Google Trends, a repository of online search data that provided insights into the temporal and regional fluctuations in "distracted boyfriend" meme searches across the vast expanse of the digital landscape. The combing of this trove of data resembled an archeological expedition, unearthing the ephemeral footprints of Internet humor with the precision of a well-honed trowel.

In parallel, the consumption of kerosene in Chad was scrutinized through data obtained from the Energy Information Administration, offering a panoramic view of energy consumption patterns that rivalled the intrigue of deciphering a cryptic inscription on an ancient tablet. This information was meticulously charted over the years 2006 to 2021, akin to mapping the molecular structure of an elusive compound yet to be discovered.

The juxtaposition of these disparate datasets, akin to two divergent streams merging into a river, unveiled a correlation that titillated the academic palate. Leveraging statistical methodologies, including linear regression and correlation analysis, allowed for the assimilation of this multidimensional data into a coherent framework that resembled the artful construction of a surrealist collage.

The examination of the correlation coefficient, accompanied by a rigorous assessment of statistical significance at p < 0.01, provided robust evidence of the unexpected association between meme virality and kerosene utilization. This analysis was underpinned by the principles of statistical inference, creating a web of evidence akin to a spider painstakingly spinning its silken strands.

The utilization of time-series analysis, akin to observing the succession of celestial phenomena, facilitated the identification of temporal patterns in meme popularity and kerosene consumption, allowing for the disentanglement of the temporal nuances inherent in these phenomena.

In culmination, this comprehensive methodological approach enabled the unraveling of the enigmatic relationship between digital culture and real-world resource utilization, illuminating the unexpected avenues through which global trends intersect with local practices.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and Kerosene used in Chad. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2006 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9358605, r-squared of 0.8758348, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Lighting Up the Internet: A Combustible Connection Between the 'Distracted Boyfriend' Meme and Kerosene Consumption in Chad"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unexpected relationship between the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and the consumption of kerosene in Chad. Using data sourced from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, we examined the correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9358605 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2006 to 2021. This surprising association calls for a closer examination of the societal influences on Internet memes and energy consumption in developing countries. The findings not only shed light on the societal impact of online trends but may also ignite further discussion on the broader implications of digital culture on real-world resource usage.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The intertwining of Internet culture and real-world phenomena has long been a topic of fascination, and in recent years, the influence of memes on societal trends has garnered increasing attention. One such meme that has captivated the digital realm is the "distracted boyfriend" meme, known for its ability to elicit both amusement and exasperation in equal measure. Meanwhile, in the realm of energy consumption, the use of kerosene in developing countries poses its own set of challenges and considerations, often overlooked in the midst of discussions about cleaner and more sustainable energy sources.
The unexpected nexus between the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and kerosene utilization in Chad represents an intriguing phenomenon that warrants closer investigation. While it may seem as improbable as a lab mouse becoming a math whiz, we were drawn to explore the potential relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Through the lens of statistics and data analysis, we sought to unravel the tangled web of influences that may underlie this unexpected correlation, and in doing so, highlight the peculiar and often surprising interplay of digital culture and real-world resource consumption.
Examining this unlikely union also serves to underscore the quirkiness of human behavior and the intricate web of correlations that can be unearthed when delving into the labyrinth of societal trends and global influences. The sheer serendipity of stumbling upon this association during our analysis was enough to ignite our curiosity and prompt us to delve deeper into the enigmatic realm of meme dynamics and energy utilization patterns. As we embark on this scholarly endeavor, we invite the reader to join us in unraveling this rather curious conundrum, where the worlds of Internet memes and kerosene usage collide in a manner akin to a dramatic plot twist in a scientific sitcom.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and kerosene consumption in Chad for the years 2006 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9358605 indicates a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This connection is as unexpected as a sudden spike in caffeine consumption among laboratory hamsters.

Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was found to be 0.8758348, signifying that approximately 87.58% of the variability in kerosene consumption in Chad can be explained by the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme. Such a high r-squared value is quite remarkable, akin to stumbling upon a particularly rare species of statistical insight in the wilds of data analysis.

Importantly, the significance level of the correlation was found to be p < 0.01, indicating that the observed correlation is not simply a result of random chance. This level of significance is as clear as a well-controlled scientific experiment yielding statistically meaningful results.

The striking correlation is encapsulated in Figure 1, which presents a scatterplot depicting the strong positive relationship between the two variables. The scatterplot illustrates the data points aligning themselves with the diligence of laboratory mice in a maze, albeit in a digital landscape of meme prevalence and kerosene utilization.

In conclusion, the findings of this study reveal a surprisingly strong correlation between the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and kerosene consumption in Chad, provoking contemplation on the unexpected interconnectedness of Internet culture and real-world resource usage. This correlation, while as surprising as a sudden eruption of laughter during a research seminar, underscores the need for further exploration of the societal influences that shape online trends and their tangible impact on energy consumption in developing countries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and Kerosene used in Chad. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Lighting Up the Internet: A Combustible Connection Between the 'Distracted Boyfriend' Meme and Kerosene Consumption in Chad"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unexpected relationship between the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and the consumption of kerosene in Chad. Using data sourced from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, we examined the correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9358605 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2006 to 2021. This surprising association calls for a closer examination of the societal influences on Internet memes and energy consumption in developing countries. The findings not only shed light on the societal impact of online trends but may also ignite further discussion on the broader implications of digital culture on real-world resource usage.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature on the topic of the connection between the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and kerosene consumption in Chad is remarkably sparse, given the seemingly incongruent nature of these two phenomena. However, a number of sources have shed light on related subjects that offer tangential insight into the intricate web of influences that may underlie this curious correlation.
In "Digital Culture and Society," Smith and Doe explore the societal impact of online trends, shedding light on the intricate ways in which Internet memes permeate and shape popular discourse. Similarly, Jones delves into the realm of digital anthropology in "Online Communities and Social Influence," offering valuable perspectives on the dynamics of online culture and its surprising reverberations in the physical world.
Turning to the realm of energy consumption in developing countries, "Energy Challenges in the 21st Century" by Author and Co-Author provides a comprehensive overview of the usage of kerosene as a primary energy source in regions such as Chad. Furthermore, "Sustainable Development and Renewable Energy" by Acclaimed Writer encapsulates the ongoing discussions and challenges surrounding energy accessibility in the developing world.
Venturing into the fictitious realm, the literary works of renowned authors such as George Orwell's "1984" and Margaret Atwood's "The Handmaid's Tale" offer cautionary tales of societal control and manipulation, drawing parallels to the influential power of digital culture. Meanwhile, in the realm of humor and satire, Douglas Adams’ "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" presents a whimsical exploration of the absurdities of interconnectedness and the unexpected ramifications of seemingly inconsequential events.
In conducting this literature review, it is worth noting that our search extended beyond conventional academic sources to include an unconventional array of materials. Insights were also gleaned from perusing the back of shampoo bottles, investigative reports by amateur conspiracy theorists, and the musings of fortune cookies. While unconventional, these sources offered unexpected perspectives and, in some cases, surprisingly compelling arguments that contributed to our understanding of the curious intersection between Internet memes and kerosene utilization.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and kerosene consumption in Chad for the years 2006 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9358605 indicates a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This connection is as unexpected as a sudden spike in caffeine consumption among laboratory hamsters.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was found to be 0.8758348, signifying that approximately 87.58% of the variability in kerosene consumption in Chad can be explained by the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme. Such a high r-squared value is quite remarkable, akin to stumbling upon a particularly rare species of statistical insight in the wilds of data analysis.
Importantly, the significance level of the correlation was found to be p < 0.01, indicating that the observed correlation is not simply a result of random chance. This level of significance is as clear as a well-controlled scientific experiment yielding statistically meaningful results.
The striking correlation is encapsulated in Figure 1, which presents a scatterplot depicting the strong positive relationship between the two variables. The scatterplot illustrates the data points aligning themselves with the diligence of laboratory mice in a maze, albeit in a digital landscape of meme prevalence and kerosene utilization.
In conclusion, the findings of this study reveal a surprisingly strong correlation between the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and kerosene consumption in Chad, provoking contemplation on the unexpected interconnectedness of Internet culture and real-world resource usage. This correlation, while as surprising as a sudden eruption of laughter during a research seminar, underscores the need for further exploration of the societal influences that shape online trends and their tangible impact on energy consumption in developing countries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this study have illuminated a compelling association between the ascendance of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and kerosene consumption in Chad. Our analysis not only corroborates the sporadic literature on this subject, but it also introduces a provocative lens through which to view the interplay of digital culture and tangible resource utilization.

Our findings resonate with the prescient insights of Smith and Doe, who contemplate the pervasive influence of online trends in shaping societal discourse. In a world where memes act as agents of influence akin to the relentless force of gravity, it appears that their impact ripples far beyond the digital realm, much like a stone causing ripples upon landing in the placid surface of empirical data.

The documented relationship also aligns with the unassuming yet pertinent perspectives of Jones, delving into the subtle dynamics of online culture and its unsuspected reverberations in the physical world. Much like an experimentally induced sneeze, the unforeseen consequences of digital memetic propagation prompt a closer examination of the far-reaching consequences.

Moreover, the unexpected correlation between the "distracted boyfriend" meme and kerosene consumption in Chad mirrors the rigorous explorations into energy challenges in the 21st century by Author and Co-Author. The robust connection we uncovered serves as an unlikely keystone, supporting the edifice of knowledge in the fickle realm of energy utilization and societal trends.

Venturing beyond the standard academic fare, the curious intertwining of Internet culture and kerosene usage also reflects the prophecies of fictional narratives, such as the dystopian caution of Orwell's "1984" or Atwood's "The Handmaid's Tale." These works subtly foreshadow the unpredictable power of digital culture, much like the subtle shift of tectonic plates preceding an unforeseen seismic event.

Furthermore, our unconventional approach to the literature review, encompassing diverse sources from the back of shampoo bottles to the musings of fortune cookies, unexpectedly unraveled unique insights. These idiosyncratic sources, much like a surprising discovery in the dusty archives of a forgotten library, contributed to an enriched understanding of this enigmatic intersection between digital memes and kerosene utilization.

In summary, the notable correlation between the "distracted boyfriend" meme and kerosene consumption in Chad adds an unexpected dimension to the discourse on digital culture and resource usage. This unforeseen nexus of influences beckons scholars and practitioners alike to probe deeper into the unforeseen repercussions of online trends on real-world phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme and Kerosene used in Chad. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Lighting Up the Internet: A Combustible Connection Between the 'Distracted Boyfriend' Meme and Kerosene Consumption in Chad"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unexpected relationship between the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and the consumption of kerosene in Chad. Using data sourced from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, we examined the correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9358605 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2006 to 2021. This surprising association calls for a closer examination of the societal influences on Internet memes and energy consumption in developing countries. The findings not only shed light on the societal impact of online trends but may also ignite further discussion on the broader implications of digital culture on real-world resource usage.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intertwining of Internet culture and real-world phenomena has long been a topic of fascination, and in recent years, the influence of memes on societal trends has garnered increasing attention. One such meme that has captivated the digital realm is the "distracted boyfriend" meme, known for its ability to elicit both amusement and exasperation in equal measure. Meanwhile, in the realm of energy consumption, the use of kerosene in developing countries poses its own set of challenges and considerations, often overlooked in the midst of discussions about cleaner and more sustainable energy sources.
The unexpected nexus between the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and kerosene utilization in Chad represents an intriguing phenomenon that warrants closer investigation. While it may seem as improbable as a lab mouse becoming a math whiz, we were drawn to explore the potential relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Through the lens of statistics and data analysis, we sought to unravel the tangled web of influences that may underlie this unexpected correlation, and in doing so, highlight the peculiar and often surprising interplay of digital culture and real-world resource consumption.
Examining this unlikely union also serves to underscore the quirkiness of human behavior and the intricate web of correlations that can be unearthed when delving into the labyrinth of societal trends and global influences. The sheer serendipity of stumbling upon this association during our analysis was enough to ignite our curiosity and prompt us to delve deeper into the enigmatic realm of meme dynamics and energy utilization patterns. As we embark on this scholarly endeavor, we invite the reader to join us in unraveling this rather curious conundrum, where the worlds of Internet memes and kerosene usage collide in a manner akin to a dramatic plot twist in a scientific sitcom.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and kerosene consumption in Chad for the years 2006 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9358605 indicates a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This connection is as unexpected as a sudden spike in caffeine consumption among laboratory hamsters.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was found to be 0.8758348, signifying that approximately 87.58% of the variability in kerosene consumption in Chad can be explained by the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme. Such a high r-squared value is quite remarkable, akin to stumbling upon a particularly rare species of statistical insight in the wilds of data analysis.
Importantly, the significance level of the correlation was found to be p < 0.01, indicating that the observed correlation is not simply a result of random chance. This level of significance is as clear as a well-controlled scientific experiment yielding statistically meaningful results.
The striking correlation is encapsulated in Figure 1, which presents a scatterplot depicting the strong positive relationship between the two variables. The scatterplot illustrates the data points aligning themselves with the diligence of laboratory mice in a maze, albeit in a digital landscape of meme prevalence and kerosene utilization.
In conclusion, the findings of this study reveal a surprisingly strong correlation between the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and kerosene consumption in Chad, provoking contemplation on the unexpected interconnectedness of Internet culture and real-world resource usage. This correlation, while as surprising as a sudden eruption of laughter during a research seminar, underscores the need for further exploration of the societal influences that shape online trends and their tangible impact on energy consumption in developing countries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the realm of Internet memes and energy consumption, this study has unraveled a correlation as unexpected as a spontaneous combustion in a laboratory setting. The robust positive relationship between the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and kerosene utilization in Chad illuminates the quirky interplay of digital culture and real-world resource usage. The high r-squared value of 0.8758348 is akin to discovering a rare statistical gem amidst a sea of data, while the significance level of p < 0.01 lends statistical gravitas to this unconventional association.

This peculiar nexus prompts contemplation on the whimsical interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena, similar to the deceptively intricate plot twists in a scientific sitcom. As such, the findings underscore the need for continued exploration of the societal influences that shape online trends and their tangible impact on energy consumption in developing countries. However, it is safe to conclude that further research in this area is as unnecessary as a redundant control group in a well-designed experiment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Lighting Up the Internet: A Combustible Connection Between the 'Distracted Boyfriend' Meme and Kerosene Consumption in Chad. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Memetics and Combustion Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Lighting Up the Internet: A Combustible Connection Between the 'Distracted Boyfriend' Meme and Kerosene Consumption in Chad. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Internet Memetics and Global Combustion Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Lighting Up the Internet: A Combustible Connection Between the 'Distracted Boyfriend' Meme and Kerosene Consumption in Chad with an abstract of This paper investigates the unexpected relationship between the popularity of the "distracted boyfriend" meme and the consumption of kerosene in Chad. Using data sourced from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, we examined the correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9358605 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2006 to 2021. This surprising association calls for a closer examination of the societal influences on Internet memes and energy consumption in developing countries. The findings not only shed light on the societal impact of online trends but may also ignite further discussion on the broader implications of digital culture on real-world resource usage.

ChatGPT:

"distracted boyfriend" meme, kerosene consumption, Chad, Google Trends, Energy Information Administration, correlation, societal influences, internet memes, energy consumption, developing countries, digital culture, resource usage

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'distracted boyfriend' (without quotes, in the United States)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.

See what else correlates with Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme

Kerosene used in Chad
Detailed data title: Volume of kerosene used consumed in Chad in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Kerosene used in Chad

Correlation r = 0.9358605 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8758348 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 87.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Kerosene used in Chad) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme) over the 16 years from 2006 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.01E-7. 0.0000001009572884372719300000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 1.01E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 9,905,179 random variables You don't actually need 9 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.82, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme (Relative popularity)43.44.222222.12500.833333211.30.8333330.528.2543.333339.08332718.4167
Kerosene used in Chad (Million Barrels/Day)0.02117810.02117810.02112020.02117810.02117810.02117810.02117810.02117810.02117810.02117810.02117810.04345210.04345210.04345210.04345210.0434521




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4,3.4,4.22222,2.125,0,0.833333,2,1,1.3,0.833333,0.5,28.25,43.3333,39.0833,27,18.4167,])
array_2 = np.array([0.0211781,0.0211781,0.0211202,0.0211781,0.0211781,0.0211781,0.0211781,0.0211781,0.0211781,0.0211781,0.0211781,0.0434521,0.0434521,0.0434521,0.0434521,0.0434521,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme"
array_2_name = "Kerosene used in Chad"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 5696 · Black Variable ID: 25128 · Red Variable ID: 24289
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0