about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,677 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Petroluem consumption in Laos and the second variable is Total comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Laos added a new energy drink to the market infused with petroleum, leading to a surge in alertness and online engagement, especially in debates over game theories.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that humorously depicts a scene in Laos where people are drinking cans of a new energy drink that is infused with petroleum as they ardently watch and comment on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. The atmosphere exudes passionate engagement and spirited discussions, symbolizing the surge in online activity fueled by the unconventional beverage. The image should encapsulate the jovial and lively nature of the scenario, merging the consumption of the unconventional energy drink with the intense involvement in YouTube comments. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Petroluem consumption in Laos and Total comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Woodblock painting Surrealism Low poly Cybernetic art a funny image you would see on reddit
ChatGPT: a funny image you would see on reddit

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Petroluem consumption in Laos and Total comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos, in the following situation: Laos added a new energy drink to the market infused with petroleum, leading to a surge in alertness and online engagement, especially in debates over game theories.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Laos, people are seen drinking cans of the new energy drink infused with petroleum as they eagerly watch and comment on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. The comments section is filled with spirited debates and discussions, reflecting the surge in online engagement due to the energy drink.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] and depicting this scene: In Laos, people are seen drinking cans of the new energy drink infused with petroleum as they eagerly watch and comment on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. The comments section is filled with spirited debates and discussions, reflecting the surge in online engagement due to the energy drink. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that humorously depicts a scene in Laos where people are drinking cans of a new energy drink that is infused with petroleum as they ardently watch and comment on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. The atmosphere exudes passionate engagement and spirited discussions, symbolizing the surge in online activity fueled by the unconventional beverage. The image should encapsulate the jovial and lively nature of the scenario, merging the consumption of the unconventional energy drink with the intense involvement in YouTube comments.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Petroluem consumption in Laos caused Total comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Fueling YouTube Conversations: The Petro-Dynamic Relationship Between Petroleum Consumption in Laos and Total Comments on The Game Theorists' Videos

Journal of Energy Consumption and Digital Discourse

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Petroluem consumption in Laos and Total comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9788857 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling YouTube Conversations: The Petro-Dynamic Relationship Between Petroleum Consumption in Laos and Total Comments on The Game Theorists' Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we examine the rather unexpected link between petroleum consumption in Laos and the total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. As of now, the connection between fuel usage and internet engagement seems as improbable as finding a pun that isn't corny - but we were pleasantly surprised. After meticulously analyzing data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9788857 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2021. It appears that, much like a well-oiled machine, there's a notable synergy between petroleum use in Laos and the lively discussions inspired by The Game Theorists' content. Our findings suggest that there may be more to fueling online conversations than meets the eye - but for that, you'll have to read the full paper!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Petroluem consumption in Laos and Total comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling YouTube Conversations: The Petro-Dynamic Relationship Between Petroleum Consumption in Laos and Total Comments on The Game Theorists' Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we examine the rather unexpected link between petroleum consumption in Laos and the total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. As of now, the connection between fuel usage and internet engagement seems as improbable as finding a pun that isn't corny - but we were pleasantly surprised. After meticulously analyzing data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9788857 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2021. It appears that, much like a well-oiled machine, there's a notable synergy between petroleum use in Laos and the lively discussions inspired by The Game Theorists' content. Our findings suggest that there may be more to fueling online conversations than meets the eye - but for that, you'll have to read the full paper!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of energy consumption and online discourse may seem like an unlikely pairing, much like trying to squeeze a laugh out of a petroleum-related dad joke. Nevertheless, as our research has unveiled, there is a surprisingly robust relationship between petroleum consumption in Laos and the total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. It appears that this connection is not merely an anomaly, but rather a statistically significant phenomenon deserving of further exploration.

Speaking of dads, did you hear about the pun about gasoline? I'm sorry, but I can't share it with you - it's just too combustible! But fear not, as we delve into the more statistically solid material at hand. The impetus for this investigation stems from the need to unravel the intricacies of internet engagement and its seemingly inexplicable resonance with energy usage patterns in specific geographical locations.

The Game Theorists, renowned for their blend of pop culture analysis and gaming insights, have amassed an extensive following on YouTube, much like how a fuel tanker accumulates mileage on the open road. Parallel to this surge in internet stardom, the consumption of petroleum in Laos has also experienced a notable uptick in recent years - a correlation that initially struck us as odd, but not as odd as discovering an oil spill in a data center.

With our research, we aim to bring to light the unexpected connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena, much like stumbling upon a hidden treasure in a deserted petrol station. We believe that our findings have the potential to not only broaden our understanding of the intricate web of global interactions but also provide a new perspective on the factors that fuel online engagement.

And speaking of fuel, did you hear about the gasoline that was excited to be used? It was revving to go! Now, let us proceed to unpack the empirical evidence that supports the existence of this intriguing interconnectedness between petroleum consumption in Laos and the lively discussions sparked by The Game Theorists' thought-provoking content.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Petroluem consumption in Laos and Total comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling YouTube Conversations: The Petro-Dynamic Relationship Between Petroleum Consumption in Laos and Total Comments on The Game Theorists' Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we examine the rather unexpected link between petroleum consumption in Laos and the total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. As of now, the connection between fuel usage and internet engagement seems as improbable as finding a pun that isn't corny - but we were pleasantly surprised. After meticulously analyzing data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9788857 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2021. It appears that, much like a well-oiled machine, there's a notable synergy between petroleum use in Laos and the lively discussions inspired by The Game Theorists' content. Our findings suggest that there may be more to fueling online conversations than meets the eye - but for that, you'll have to read the full paper!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of energy consumption and online discourse may seem like an unlikely pairing, much like trying to squeeze a laugh out of a petroleum-related dad joke. Nevertheless, as our research has unveiled, there is a surprisingly robust relationship between petroleum consumption in Laos and the total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. It appears that this connection is not merely an anomaly, but rather a statistically significant phenomenon deserving of further exploration.
Speaking of dads, did you hear about the pun about gasoline? I'm sorry, but I can't share it with you - it's just too combustible! But fear not, as we delve into the more statistically solid material at hand. The impetus for this investigation stems from the need to unravel the intricacies of internet engagement and its seemingly inexplicable resonance with energy usage patterns in specific geographical locations.
The Game Theorists, renowned for their blend of pop culture analysis and gaming insights, have amassed an extensive following on YouTube, much like how a fuel tanker accumulates mileage on the open road. Parallel to this surge in internet stardom, the consumption of petroleum in Laos has also experienced a notable uptick in recent years - a correlation that initially struck us as odd, but not as odd as discovering an oil spill in a data center.
With our research, we aim to bring to light the unexpected connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena, much like stumbling upon a hidden treasure in a deserted petrol station. We believe that our findings have the potential to not only broaden our understanding of the intricate web of global interactions but also provide a new perspective on the factors that fuel online engagement.
And speaking of fuel, did you hear about the gasoline that was excited to be used? It was revving to go! Now, let us proceed to unpack the empirical evidence that supports the existence of this intriguing interconnectedness between petroleum consumption in Laos and the lively discussions sparked by The Game Theorists' thought-provoking content.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

A plethora of scholarly works have delved into the intricate relationship between energy consumption and online engagement, akin to untangling the knotty problem of determining the optimal fuel efficiency of a hybrid car. Smith et al. (2017) analyzed the impact of renewable energy sources on social media discourse, uncovering a correlation that was positively charged, much like a proton in a confined space. They demonstrated how the share of wind and solar power in energy consumption positively influenced social media interactions, shedding light on the electrifying nature of renewable energy discussions.

But let's not stray too far from the focus - the petroleum-related charm of our investigation. Moving onto the next serious publication, Doe and Jones (2019) scrutinized the association between fossil fuel consumption and online community engagement, revealing a significant relationship that was as clear as the emissions from an inefficient car. Their findings indicated that higher levels of fossil fuel use were associated with an elevated volume of online conversations, mirroring the incessant chatter of a malfunctioning combustion engine.

Now, let's take a small segue into the realm of non-fiction literature. In "The Quest: Energy, Security, and the Remaking of the Modern World," the authors espouse the compelling narrative of the global pursuit of energy, which, much like our research, uncovers unexpected connections and interdependencies. Conversely, "Energy and Civilization: A History" by Smil offers a historical perspective on the dynamics of energy and society, akin to the long and winding road of our investigation.

A touch of fiction, though seemingly unrelated, can invigorate the discourse. "Oil!" by Upton Sinclair portrays the oil industry's rise to prominence in the United States, echoing the unexpected ascendancy of petroleum consumption and online discussion in Laos. Similarly, "The Catcher in the Rye" by J.D. Salinger, albeit non-energy related, captures the unpredictable nature of human connections - much like the unpredictable link between petroleum use in Laos and The Game Theorists' YouTube comments.

Not to veer off course, but who can forget the animated wonders of our childhood? After all, "The Magic School Bus" and "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" instilled in us the early appreciation for the delicate balance between energy consumption and environmental impact - a balance that, in a quirky twist, seems to extend to the relationship between petroleum use in Laos and the digital conversations surrounding The Game Theorists' content.

But I digress - let's bring our focus back to the scholarly discourse at hand.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Petroluem consumption in Laos and Total comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and YouTube . You used data from 2009 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling YouTube Conversations: The Petro-Dynamic Relationship Between Petroleum Consumption in Laos and Total Comments on The Game Theorists' Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we examine the rather unexpected link between petroleum consumption in Laos and the total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. As of now, the connection between fuel usage and internet engagement seems as improbable as finding a pun that isn't corny - but we were pleasantly surprised. After meticulously analyzing data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9788857 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2021. It appears that, much like a well-oiled machine, there's a notable synergy between petroleum use in Laos and the lively discussions inspired by The Game Theorists' content. Our findings suggest that there may be more to fueling online conversations than meets the eye - but for that, you'll have to read the full paper!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of energy consumption and online discourse may seem like an unlikely pairing, much like trying to squeeze a laugh out of a petroleum-related dad joke. Nevertheless, as our research has unveiled, there is a surprisingly robust relationship between petroleum consumption in Laos and the total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. It appears that this connection is not merely an anomaly, but rather a statistically significant phenomenon deserving of further exploration.
Speaking of dads, did you hear about the pun about gasoline? I'm sorry, but I can't share it with you - it's just too combustible! But fear not, as we delve into the more statistically solid material at hand. The impetus for this investigation stems from the need to unravel the intricacies of internet engagement and its seemingly inexplicable resonance with energy usage patterns in specific geographical locations.
The Game Theorists, renowned for their blend of pop culture analysis and gaming insights, have amassed an extensive following on YouTube, much like how a fuel tanker accumulates mileage on the open road. Parallel to this surge in internet stardom, the consumption of petroleum in Laos has also experienced a notable uptick in recent years - a correlation that initially struck us as odd, but not as odd as discovering an oil spill in a data center.
With our research, we aim to bring to light the unexpected connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena, much like stumbling upon a hidden treasure in a deserted petrol station. We believe that our findings have the potential to not only broaden our understanding of the intricate web of global interactions but also provide a new perspective on the factors that fuel online engagement.
And speaking of fuel, did you hear about the gasoline that was excited to be used? It was revving to go! Now, let us proceed to unpack the empirical evidence that supports the existence of this intriguing interconnectedness between petroleum consumption in Laos and the lively discussions sparked by The Game Theorists' thought-provoking content.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the correlation between petroleum consumption in Laos and the total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos, a mixed-methods approach was employed. First, data on petroleum consumption in Laos was gathered from the Energy Information Administration, providing a comprehensive overview of the country's fuel usage patterns over the period from 2009 to 2021. This data was essential for ensuring that our analysis encompassed a wide spectrum of oil-related activity, much like how an automobile's fuel gauge covers the entire range from "full tank" to "need more fuel."

YouTube comment data, on the other hand, required a more unconventional sleuthing technique. Our research team employed a combination of web scraping algorithms and crowd-sourced data collection methods to ensure a robust dataset capturing the rich tapestry of comments gracing The Game Theorists' videos. Our approach was a bit like panning for gold in a digital river - sifting through a multitude of comments to extract the nuggets of insight and intrigue.

Moreover, to ensure accuracy in our data collection, each comment was subjected to a rigorous vetting process to filter out any irrelevant or repetitive content. This process was as meticulous as meticulously checking the pressure of each tire before embarking on a long journey - ensuring that only the most relevant and reliable comments made it into our final dataset.

Once the datasets were compiled, a series of statistical analyses were conducted to gauge the correlation between petroleum consumption in Laos and the total number of comments on The Game Theorists' videos. The data was visualized using scatterplots, which allowed us to map out the relationship between these seemingly disparate variables and identify any potential patterns. Our statistical approach was as precise as calibrating a high-performance engine, ensuring that our findings were fueled by accuracy and objectivity.

In addition to the quantitative analyses, qualitative methods were also applied to interpret the contextual relevance of the comment data in relation to petroleum consumption patterns. This involved a thematic analysis of selected comments, aiming to uncover themes and trends that could shed light on the underlying dynamics of this interconnectedness. The process was akin to conducting a close examination of different components in an engine to understand how they contribute to overall performance.

Finally, to validate the robustness of our findings, a series of sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the stability of the relationship between petroleum consumption in Laos and YouTube comments, in the face of potential outliers and confounding variables. This was necessary to ensure that our results were as sturdy as a well-constructed suspension system in a high-mileage vehicle.

In summary, our research employed a comprehensive and multi-faceted approach to unravel the enigmatic relationship between petroleum consumption in Laos and the captivating conversations sparked by The Game Theorists' videos. Our methods were as diverse and engaging as the content we sought to understand, ensuring that our findings were both scientifically rigorous and intellectually stimulating.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Petroluem consumption in Laos and Total comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and YouTube .

For the time period 2009 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9788857, r-squared of 0.9582173, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling YouTube Conversations: The Petro-Dynamic Relationship Between Petroleum Consumption in Laos and Total Comments on The Game Theorists' Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we examine the rather unexpected link between petroleum consumption in Laos and the total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. As of now, the connection between fuel usage and internet engagement seems as improbable as finding a pun that isn't corny - but we were pleasantly surprised. After meticulously analyzing data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9788857 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2021. It appears that, much like a well-oiled machine, there's a notable synergy between petroleum use in Laos and the lively discussions inspired by The Game Theorists' content. Our findings suggest that there may be more to fueling online conversations than meets the eye - but for that, you'll have to read the full paper!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of energy consumption and online discourse may seem like an unlikely pairing, much like trying to squeeze a laugh out of a petroleum-related dad joke. Nevertheless, as our research has unveiled, there is a surprisingly robust relationship between petroleum consumption in Laos and the total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. It appears that this connection is not merely an anomaly, but rather a statistically significant phenomenon deserving of further exploration.
Speaking of dads, did you hear about the pun about gasoline? I'm sorry, but I can't share it with you - it's just too combustible! But fear not, as we delve into the more statistically solid material at hand. The impetus for this investigation stems from the need to unravel the intricacies of internet engagement and its seemingly inexplicable resonance with energy usage patterns in specific geographical locations.
The Game Theorists, renowned for their blend of pop culture analysis and gaming insights, have amassed an extensive following on YouTube, much like how a fuel tanker accumulates mileage on the open road. Parallel to this surge in internet stardom, the consumption of petroleum in Laos has also experienced a notable uptick in recent years - a correlation that initially struck us as odd, but not as odd as discovering an oil spill in a data center.
With our research, we aim to bring to light the unexpected connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena, much like stumbling upon a hidden treasure in a deserted petrol station. We believe that our findings have the potential to not only broaden our understanding of the intricate web of global interactions but also provide a new perspective on the factors that fuel online engagement.
And speaking of fuel, did you hear about the gasoline that was excited to be used? It was revving to go! Now, let us proceed to unpack the empirical evidence that supports the existence of this intriguing interconnectedness between petroleum consumption in Laos and the lively discussions sparked by The Game Theorists' thought-provoking content.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between petroleum consumption in Laos and the total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.9788857 indicates a robust linear relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that just as a well-fueled car runs smoothly, the interaction between petroleum consumption and online engagement in Laos follows a similar trajectory.

The r-squared value of 0.9582173 indicates that approximately 95.8% of the variation in total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos can be explained by the variation in petroleum consumption in Laos. This substantial explanatory power suggests that the influence of petroleum consumption on online discourse is as apparent as a fuel gauge hitting empty.

Furthermore, the statistical significance of the relationship is underscored by the p-value of less than 0.01. This provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis and indicates that the observed correlation is unlikely to be a chance occurrence. Much like a well-oiled pun, the association between petroleum consumption in Laos and The Game Theorists' online engagement seems to be no laughing matter.

In Figure 1 (to be added), the scatterplot illustrates the clear and strong positive linear relationship between petroleum consumption in Laos and the total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. This visual representation reaffirms the statistical findings and highlights the striking connection between these seemingly unrelated variables.

The findings of our study shed light on the unexpected association between energy consumption in Laos and online discourse, highlighting the potential interplay between global energy usage patterns and digital engagement. It appears that just as a well-maintained engine powers a vehicle, the consumption of petroleum in Laos fuels the vibrant discussions surrounding The Game Theorists' content on the internet.

And now, for a bit of comic relief: Did you hear about the petroleum enthusiast who was also a die-hard fan of The Game Theorists' videos? They always said, "I'm pumped for the next upload!" It seems their enthusiasm wasn't just a gas – our research confirms there's a real connection between their interests!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Petroluem consumption in Laos and Total comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Fueling YouTube Conversations: The Petro-Dynamic Relationship Between Petroleum Consumption in Laos and Total Comments on The Game Theorists' Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we examine the rather unexpected link between petroleum consumption in Laos and the total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. As of now, the connection between fuel usage and internet engagement seems as improbable as finding a pun that isn't corny - but we were pleasantly surprised. After meticulously analyzing data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9788857 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2021. It appears that, much like a well-oiled machine, there's a notable synergy between petroleum use in Laos and the lively discussions inspired by The Game Theorists' content. Our findings suggest that there may be more to fueling online conversations than meets the eye - but for that, you'll have to read the full paper!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
A plethora of scholarly works have delved into the intricate relationship between energy consumption and online engagement, akin to untangling the knotty problem of determining the optimal fuel efficiency of a hybrid car. Smith et al. (2017) analyzed the impact of renewable energy sources on social media discourse, uncovering a correlation that was positively charged, much like a proton in a confined space. They demonstrated how the share of wind and solar power in energy consumption positively influenced social media interactions, shedding light on the electrifying nature of renewable energy discussions.
But let's not stray too far from the focus - the petroleum-related charm of our investigation. Moving onto the next serious publication, Doe and Jones (2019) scrutinized the association between fossil fuel consumption and online community engagement, revealing a significant relationship that was as clear as the emissions from an inefficient car. Their findings indicated that higher levels of fossil fuel use were associated with an elevated volume of online conversations, mirroring the incessant chatter of a malfunctioning combustion engine.
Now, let's take a small segue into the realm of non-fiction literature. In "The Quest: Energy, Security, and the Remaking of the Modern World," the authors espouse the compelling narrative of the global pursuit of energy, which, much like our research, uncovers unexpected connections and interdependencies. Conversely, "Energy and Civilization: A History" by Smil offers a historical perspective on the dynamics of energy and society, akin to the long and winding road of our investigation.
A touch of fiction, though seemingly unrelated, can invigorate the discourse. "Oil!" by Upton Sinclair portrays the oil industry's rise to prominence in the United States, echoing the unexpected ascendancy of petroleum consumption and online discussion in Laos. Similarly, "The Catcher in the Rye" by J.D. Salinger, albeit non-energy related, captures the unpredictable nature of human connections - much like the unpredictable link between petroleum use in Laos and The Game Theorists' YouTube comments.
Not to veer off course, but who can forget the animated wonders of our childhood? After all, "The Magic School Bus" and "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" instilled in us the early appreciation for the delicate balance between energy consumption and environmental impact - a balance that, in a quirky twist, seems to extend to the relationship between petroleum use in Laos and the digital conversations surrounding The Game Theorists' content.
But I digress - let's bring our focus back to the scholarly discourse at hand.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between petroleum consumption in Laos and the total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.9788857 indicates a robust linear relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that just as a well-fueled car runs smoothly, the interaction between petroleum consumption and online engagement in Laos follows a similar trajectory.
The r-squared value of 0.9582173 indicates that approximately 95.8% of the variation in total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos can be explained by the variation in petroleum consumption in Laos. This substantial explanatory power suggests that the influence of petroleum consumption on online discourse is as apparent as a fuel gauge hitting empty.
Furthermore, the statistical significance of the relationship is underscored by the p-value of less than 0.01. This provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis and indicates that the observed correlation is unlikely to be a chance occurrence. Much like a well-oiled pun, the association between petroleum consumption in Laos and The Game Theorists' online engagement seems to be no laughing matter.
In Figure 1 (to be added), the scatterplot illustrates the clear and strong positive linear relationship between petroleum consumption in Laos and the total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. This visual representation reaffirms the statistical findings and highlights the striking connection between these seemingly unrelated variables.
The findings of our study shed light on the unexpected association between energy consumption in Laos and online discourse, highlighting the potential interplay between global energy usage patterns and digital engagement. It appears that just as a well-maintained engine powers a vehicle, the consumption of petroleum in Laos fuels the vibrant discussions surrounding The Game Theorists' content on the internet.
And now, for a bit of comic relief: Did you hear about the petroleum enthusiast who was also a die-hard fan of The Game Theorists' videos? They always said, "I'm pumped for the next upload!" It seems their enthusiasm wasn't just a gas – our research confirms there's a real connection between their interests!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings provide compelling support for the prior research that has explored the intriguing relationship between energy consumption and online engagement. The significant positive correlation we observed between petroleum consumption in Laos and the total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos aligns with the work of Smith et al. (2017) and Doe and Jones (2019), shedding further light on the unexpected interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate phenomena. It appears that just as renewable energy sources and fossil fuel consumption have been shown to impact social media interactions, the influence of petroleum usage on digital discourse cannot be underestimated. We've gone from puzzling over the strangeness of this intersection to refining and filling our tank with evidence of its existence.

Much like the unexpected comedic turn in a scholarly lecture, our data provides a clear and robust demonstration of the relationship between petroleum consumption in Laos and online engagement with The Game Theorists' content. The high correlation coefficient and r-squared value suggest that the variation in petroleum consumption in Laos explains a substantial proportion of the variation in the total comments on the YouTube videos. It seems that, contrary to expectations, the petroleum-related activity in Laos fuels a significant portion of the online discourse around gaming theories. It's as if we've stumbled upon a latent energy source for internet conversations - quite the unexpected twist in this plot.

The statistical significance of our findings, highlighted by the low p-value, further underscores the substantial relationship between energy consumption in Laos and digital engagement. This result stands as a testament to the unexpected surprises that can emerge from seemingly unrelated variables in research. In a similar unexpected turn, the association between petroleum use in Laos and The Game Theorists' online engagement seems to be no laughing matter indeed, mirroring the unexpected humor that occasionally sneaks into academic discourse.

Our visual representation of the strong positive linear relationship through the scatterplot further strengthens our argument for the surprising connection between petroleum consumption and online discourse. This robust evidence corroborates the unexpected alliance between energy consumption in Laos and the digital conversations surrounding The Game Theorists' content. It's almost like finding an Easter egg in a gaming world - unexpected, thrilling, and unquestionably tied to our main quest.

In wrapping up, it's clear that our study has opened the door to a whole new realm of inquiry, highlighting the unanticipated links between energy usage and internet engagement. The unexpectedly strong association between petroleum consumption in Laos and The Game Theorists' online engagement challenges conventional wisdom and raises important questions for future research. Much like the unexpected twists and turns of a good dad joke, our findings underscore the underlying complexities and interdependencies that can arise from seemingly unrelated phenomena. It's as if the punchline to this puzzle was hiding in plain sight all along.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Petroluem consumption in Laos and Total comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Fueling YouTube Conversations: The Petro-Dynamic Relationship Between Petroleum Consumption in Laos and Total Comments on The Game Theorists' Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we examine the rather unexpected link between petroleum consumption in Laos and the total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. As of now, the connection between fuel usage and internet engagement seems as improbable as finding a pun that isn't corny - but we were pleasantly surprised. After meticulously analyzing data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9788857 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2021. It appears that, much like a well-oiled machine, there's a notable synergy between petroleum use in Laos and the lively discussions inspired by The Game Theorists' content. Our findings suggest that there may be more to fueling online conversations than meets the eye - but for that, you'll have to read the full paper!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of energy consumption and online discourse may seem like an unlikely pairing, much like trying to squeeze a laugh out of a petroleum-related dad joke. Nevertheless, as our research has unveiled, there is a surprisingly robust relationship between petroleum consumption in Laos and the total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. It appears that this connection is not merely an anomaly, but rather a statistically significant phenomenon deserving of further exploration.
Speaking of dads, did you hear about the pun about gasoline? I'm sorry, but I can't share it with you - it's just too combustible! But fear not, as we delve into the more statistically solid material at hand. The impetus for this investigation stems from the need to unravel the intricacies of internet engagement and its seemingly inexplicable resonance with energy usage patterns in specific geographical locations.
The Game Theorists, renowned for their blend of pop culture analysis and gaming insights, have amassed an extensive following on YouTube, much like how a fuel tanker accumulates mileage on the open road. Parallel to this surge in internet stardom, the consumption of petroleum in Laos has also experienced a notable uptick in recent years - a correlation that initially struck us as odd, but not as odd as discovering an oil spill in a data center.
With our research, we aim to bring to light the unexpected connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena, much like stumbling upon a hidden treasure in a deserted petrol station. We believe that our findings have the potential to not only broaden our understanding of the intricate web of global interactions but also provide a new perspective on the factors that fuel online engagement.
And speaking of fuel, did you hear about the gasoline that was excited to be used? It was revving to go! Now, let us proceed to unpack the empirical evidence that supports the existence of this intriguing interconnectedness between petroleum consumption in Laos and the lively discussions sparked by The Game Theorists' thought-provoking content.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between petroleum consumption in Laos and the total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.9788857 indicates a robust linear relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that just as a well-fueled car runs smoothly, the interaction between petroleum consumption and online engagement in Laos follows a similar trajectory.
The r-squared value of 0.9582173 indicates that approximately 95.8% of the variation in total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos can be explained by the variation in petroleum consumption in Laos. This substantial explanatory power suggests that the influence of petroleum consumption on online discourse is as apparent as a fuel gauge hitting empty.
Furthermore, the statistical significance of the relationship is underscored by the p-value of less than 0.01. This provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis and indicates that the observed correlation is unlikely to be a chance occurrence. Much like a well-oiled pun, the association between petroleum consumption in Laos and The Game Theorists' online engagement seems to be no laughing matter.
In Figure 1 (to be added), the scatterplot illustrates the clear and strong positive linear relationship between petroleum consumption in Laos and the total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. This visual representation reaffirms the statistical findings and highlights the striking connection between these seemingly unrelated variables.
The findings of our study shed light on the unexpected association between energy consumption in Laos and online discourse, highlighting the potential interplay between global energy usage patterns and digital engagement. It appears that just as a well-maintained engine powers a vehicle, the consumption of petroleum in Laos fuels the vibrant discussions surrounding The Game Theorists' content on the internet.
And now, for a bit of comic relief: Did you hear about the petroleum enthusiast who was also a die-hard fan of The Game Theorists' videos? They always said, "I'm pumped for the next upload!" It seems their enthusiasm wasn't just a gas – our research confirms there's a real connection between their interests!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the unexpected association between petroleum consumption in Laos and the total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos has revealed a surprising and statistically significant connection. It appears that much like a well-oiled machine, there is indeed a notable synergy between these seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings suggest that there may be more to fueling online conversations than meets the eye, and the implications of this discovery are as vast as a petroleum reserve.

The robust correlation coefficient and the high explanatory power of the relationship indicate that the influence of petroleum consumption on online engagement is as palpable as a full tank of gas. This unexpected nexus raises intriguing questions about the interplay between global energy usage patterns and digital discourse, provoking contemplation as deep as an oil well.

As we wrap up this research, it's important to note that no more research is needed in this area, as it seems we've already struck oil in terms of understanding this peculiar relationship. Our findings provide an illuminating precedent for future studies exploring the uncharted territories of energy-consumption-influenced online interactions. In the wise words of many dads, it's time to "pump the brakes" on further investigations in this peculiar realm.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fueling YouTube Conversations: The Petro-Dynamic Relationship Between Petroleum Consumption in Laos and Total Comments on The Game Theorists' Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Energy Consumption and Digital Discourse


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fueling YouTube Conversations: The Petro-Dynamic Relationship Between Petroleum Consumption in Laos and Total Comments on The Game Theorists' Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Transnational Energy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fueling YouTube Conversations: The Petro-Dynamic Relationship Between Petroleum Consumption in Laos and Total Comments on The Game Theorists' Videos with an abstract of In this paper, we examine the rather unexpected link between petroleum consumption in Laos and the total comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. As of now, the connection between fuel usage and internet engagement seems as improbable as finding a pun that isn't corny - but we were pleasantly surprised. After meticulously analyzing data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9788857 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2021. It appears that, much like a well-oiled machine, there's a notable synergy between petroleum use in Laos and the lively discussions inspired by The Game Theorists' content. Our findings suggest that there may be more to fueling online conversations than meets the eye - but for that, you'll have to read the full paper!

ChatGPT:

petroleum consumption, Laos, YouTube comments, The Game Theorists, online engagement, correlation coefficient, Energy Information Administration, internet engagement, fuel usage, data analysis, synergy, online conversations

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Petroluem consumption in Laos
Detailed data title: Volume of petroluem consumption consumed in Laos in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Petroluem consumption in Laos

Total comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Total comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9788857 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9582173 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Petroluem consumption in Laos) over the 13 years from 2009 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.2E-9. 0.0000000062329142094032970000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 6.2E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 160,438,595 random variables You don't actually need 160 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.93, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Petroluem consumption in Laos (Million Barrels/Day)13.927514.470114.93716.650917.091717.73120.584820.674721.236723.606419.267618.260218.856
Total comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos (Total comments)434214779134577231566644115839772145500014935801706370254717013846601161610927863




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([13.9275,14.4701,14.937,16.6509,17.0917,17.731,20.5848,20.6747,21.2367,23.6064,19.2676,18.2602,18.856,])
array_2 = np.array([4342,14779,134577,231566,644115,839772,1455000,1493580,1706370,2547170,1384660,1161610,927863,])
array_1_name = "Petroluem consumption in Laos"
array_2_name = "Total comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 5677 · Black Variable ID: 24612 · Red Variable ID: 25735
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0