about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,602 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Asthma prevalence in American children.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2019, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the excitement from LEMMiNO's less nerdy video titles decreased, so did the frequency of intense inhalations, ultimately leading to a decrease in asthma prevalence in American children. Don't hold your breath for a thesis on this bizarre correlation!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a meme showing a room filled with children. In the background, a TV screen displays the LEMMiNO YouTube channel playing a video titled "The Science of Sleep," with a less nerdy title. The children are watching with decreasing excitement, and with each passing minute, they take fewer intense inhalations. As they relax, the air clears, and a chart on the wall shows a decrease in asthma prevalence in American children. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are and Asthma prevalence in American children. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Whimsical illustration a meme Scalar art Brutalism
ChatGPT: A meme

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are and Asthma prevalence in American children, in the following situation: As the excitement from LEMMiNO's less nerdy video titles decreased, so did the frequency of intense inhalations, ultimately leading to a decrease in asthma prevalence in American children. Don't hold your breath for a thesis on this bizarre correlation!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a room filled with children, a TV screen shows the LEMMiNO YouTube channel with a video titled "The Science of Sleep" - a less nerdy title. The kids watch with decreasing excitement, taking fewer intense inhalations with each passing minute. As they relax, the air clears, and a chart on the wall shows a decrease in asthma prevalence in American children.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A meme ] and depicting this scene: In a room filled with children, a TV screen shows the LEMMiNO YouTube channel with a video titled "The Science of Sleep" - a less nerdy title. The kids watch with decreasing excitement, taking fewer intense inhalations with each passing minute. As they relax, the air clears, and a chart on the wall shows a decrease in asthma prevalence in American children. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a meme showing a room filled with children. In the background, a TV screen displays the LEMMiNO YouTube channel playing a video titled "The Science of Sleep," with a less nerdy title. The children are watching with decreasing excitement, and with each passing minute, they take fewer intense inhalations. As they relax, the air clears, and a chart on the wall shows a decrease in asthma prevalence in American children.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in How nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are caused Asthma prevalence in American children to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Asthma Glitch: The LEMMiNO Effect on American Children

The Journal of Pediatric Pseudoscience

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are and Asthma prevalence in American children. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and National Center for Health Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9031727 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2019.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Asthma Glitch: The LEMMiNO Effect on American Children

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study probes the whimsical yet oddly persistent link between the nerdy and intellectually stimulating YouTube video titles crafted by LEMMiNO and the prevalence of asthma among American children. Employing an innovative blend of statistical analysis and good old-fashioned wordplay, we utilized AI to scrutinize LEMMiNO's video titles and National Center for Health Statistics data to address this seemingly far-fetched correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9031727 and a delightfully impressive p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2019, our findings unearth a remarkably robust connection between the two seemingly unrelated entities. Through this study, we not only shed light on the potential impact of cerebral entertainment on respiratory health but also manage to inject some levity into the often serious realm of medical research. Our work stands as a testament to the unexpected avenues that academia can lead us down and the lighthearted curiosity that drives our quest for knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are and Asthma prevalence in American children. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Asthma Glitch: The LEMMiNO Effect on American Children

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study probes the whimsical yet oddly persistent link between the nerdy and intellectually stimulating YouTube video titles crafted by LEMMiNO and the prevalence of asthma among American children. Employing an innovative blend of statistical analysis and good old-fashioned wordplay, we utilized AI to scrutinize LEMMiNO's video titles and National Center for Health Statistics data to address this seemingly far-fetched correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9031727 and a delightfully impressive p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2019, our findings unearth a remarkably robust connection between the two seemingly unrelated entities. Through this study, we not only shed light on the potential impact of cerebral entertainment on respiratory health but also manage to inject some levity into the often serious realm of medical research. Our work stands as a testament to the unexpected avenues that academia can lead us down and the lighthearted curiosity that drives our quest for knowledge.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The concept of nerdy YouTube video titles and their potential impact on public health may initially seem like the plot of a particularly eccentric science fiction film. However, as improbable as it may sound, the linkage between LEMMiNO's intellectually stimulating content and the prevalence of asthma among American children has emerged as an area of interest and curiosity within the scientific community. This unexpected and somewhat whimsical association has piqued our scholarly interest, leading us down a rabbit hole of statistical analysis, AI scrutiny, and an inexplicable urge to inject some humor into the world of medical research.

While research on the etiology and prevalence of asthma has traditionally focused on variables such as air pollution, genetic predisposition, and allergen exposure, our investigation takes an unorthodox and, some might argue, slightly quirky approach. By delving into the realm of YouTube entertainment, we explore the potential influence of intellectually stimulating content on respiratory health. Through the lens of LEMMiNO's video titles, we aim to uncover whether there is indeed a tangible connection between nerdy online allure and the breathing woes of American youngsters.

In this paper, we endeavor to navigate the labyrinth of statistical analysis and linguistic charm to elucidate the curious correlation between the pedantic charm of LEMMiNO's video titles and the respiratory well-being of America's youth. As we embark on this whimsical yet scholarly adventure, we hope to not only unravel an unexpected connection but also infuse some levity into the often-serious landscape of medical research. After all, who said academia couldn't have a little fun along the way?

Our exploration of the "Asthma Glitch" phenomenon intertwines the realms of statistics, linguistic charm, and public health in a manner that is equal parts entertaining and enlightening. So, grab your inhaler and get ready for a nerdy, statistically robust, and surprisingly humorous journey into the realms of YouTube and respiratory health.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are and Asthma prevalence in American children. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Asthma Glitch: The LEMMiNO Effect on American Children

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study probes the whimsical yet oddly persistent link between the nerdy and intellectually stimulating YouTube video titles crafted by LEMMiNO and the prevalence of asthma among American children. Employing an innovative blend of statistical analysis and good old-fashioned wordplay, we utilized AI to scrutinize LEMMiNO's video titles and National Center for Health Statistics data to address this seemingly far-fetched correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9031727 and a delightfully impressive p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2019, our findings unearth a remarkably robust connection between the two seemingly unrelated entities. Through this study, we not only shed light on the potential impact of cerebral entertainment on respiratory health but also manage to inject some levity into the often serious realm of medical research. Our work stands as a testament to the unexpected avenues that academia can lead us down and the lighthearted curiosity that drives our quest for knowledge.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The concept of nerdy YouTube video titles and their potential impact on public health may initially seem like the plot of a particularly eccentric science fiction film. However, as improbable as it may sound, the linkage between LEMMiNO's intellectually stimulating content and the prevalence of asthma among American children has emerged as an area of interest and curiosity within the scientific community. This unexpected and somewhat whimsical association has piqued our scholarly interest, leading us down a rabbit hole of statistical analysis, AI scrutiny, and an inexplicable urge to inject some humor into the world of medical research.
While research on the etiology and prevalence of asthma has traditionally focused on variables such as air pollution, genetic predisposition, and allergen exposure, our investigation takes an unorthodox and, some might argue, slightly quirky approach. By delving into the realm of YouTube entertainment, we explore the potential influence of intellectually stimulating content on respiratory health. Through the lens of LEMMiNO's video titles, we aim to uncover whether there is indeed a tangible connection between nerdy online allure and the breathing woes of American youngsters.
In this paper, we endeavor to navigate the labyrinth of statistical analysis and linguistic charm to elucidate the curious correlation between the pedantic charm of LEMMiNO's video titles and the respiratory well-being of America's youth. As we embark on this whimsical yet scholarly adventure, we hope to not only unravel an unexpected connection but also infuse some levity into the often-serious landscape of medical research. After all, who said academia couldn't have a little fun along the way?
Our exploration of the "Asthma Glitch" phenomenon intertwines the realms of statistics, linguistic charm, and public health in a manner that is equal parts entertaining and enlightening. So, grab your inhaler and get ready for a nerdy, statistically robust, and surprisingly humorous journey into the realms of YouTube and respiratory health.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the prevalence of asthma in American children initially sounds as unlikely as a wizard wielding a stethoscope, but the body of literature on this peculiar correlation has steadily grown, much like the suspense in a mystery novel. In their seminal work, Smith et al. (2015) examine the potential effects of online intellectual stimulation on respiratory health, laying the groundwork for our investigation. Building on this foundation, Doe and Jones (2018) offer further insight into the intriguing link between linguistic magnetism and pediatric pulmonary function, setting the stage for our own whimsical yet rigorous exploration.

Turning the page to non-fiction offerings, "Breathing Easy: A Comprehensive Guide to Pediatric Asthma" by Thompson (2016) and "The Nerdy Mind: How Intellectual Stimulation Shapes the Brain" by Harris (2017) tantalizingly touch upon elements relevant to our study. As the plot thickens, we encounter a speculative twist in the literature through the fictional musings of "Asthmatic Adventures: A Whimsical Tale of Wheezes" by Jenkins (2014) and "The Asthma Enigma: Respiratory Riddles and Nerdy Nostalgia" by Baker (2019), offering lighthearted yet oddly poignant narratives on our topic.

In the realm of televised entertainment, the authors thought it prudent to consume copious quantities of "The Big Bang Theory" and "Stranger Things" for some lighthearted yet scholarly inspiration. These shows, with their clever wordplay and intriguing plot twists, seemed apropos for our research on the nerdy and the nebulous.

As the prologue for our exploration draws to a close, we invite the reader to accompany us on this curious yet compelling odyssey through statistical analysis, linguistic charm, and the whimsical corridors of YouTube and respiratory health. With our findings, we hope not only to expand the boundaries of medical research but also to inject a healthy dose of levity into the often serious pursuit of knowledge. Join us as we embark on this scholarly escapade and unravel the Asthma Glitch phenomenon, breathing new life into the seemingly unrelated domains of YouTube entertainment and pediatric pulmonary well-being.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are and Asthma prevalence in American children. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and National Center for Health Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2019

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Asthma Glitch: The LEMMiNO Effect on American Children

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study probes the whimsical yet oddly persistent link between the nerdy and intellectually stimulating YouTube video titles crafted by LEMMiNO and the prevalence of asthma among American children. Employing an innovative blend of statistical analysis and good old-fashioned wordplay, we utilized AI to scrutinize LEMMiNO's video titles and National Center for Health Statistics data to address this seemingly far-fetched correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9031727 and a delightfully impressive p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2019, our findings unearth a remarkably robust connection between the two seemingly unrelated entities. Through this study, we not only shed light on the potential impact of cerebral entertainment on respiratory health but also manage to inject some levity into the often serious realm of medical research. Our work stands as a testament to the unexpected avenues that academia can lead us down and the lighthearted curiosity that drives our quest for knowledge.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The concept of nerdy YouTube video titles and their potential impact on public health may initially seem like the plot of a particularly eccentric science fiction film. However, as improbable as it may sound, the linkage between LEMMiNO's intellectually stimulating content and the prevalence of asthma among American children has emerged as an area of interest and curiosity within the scientific community. This unexpected and somewhat whimsical association has piqued our scholarly interest, leading us down a rabbit hole of statistical analysis, AI scrutiny, and an inexplicable urge to inject some humor into the world of medical research.
While research on the etiology and prevalence of asthma has traditionally focused on variables such as air pollution, genetic predisposition, and allergen exposure, our investigation takes an unorthodox and, some might argue, slightly quirky approach. By delving into the realm of YouTube entertainment, we explore the potential influence of intellectually stimulating content on respiratory health. Through the lens of LEMMiNO's video titles, we aim to uncover whether there is indeed a tangible connection between nerdy online allure and the breathing woes of American youngsters.
In this paper, we endeavor to navigate the labyrinth of statistical analysis and linguistic charm to elucidate the curious correlation between the pedantic charm of LEMMiNO's video titles and the respiratory well-being of America's youth. As we embark on this whimsical yet scholarly adventure, we hope to not only unravel an unexpected connection but also infuse some levity into the often-serious landscape of medical research. After all, who said academia couldn't have a little fun along the way?
Our exploration of the "Asthma Glitch" phenomenon intertwines the realms of statistics, linguistic charm, and public health in a manner that is equal parts entertaining and enlightening. So, grab your inhaler and get ready for a nerdy, statistically robust, and surprisingly humorous journey into the realms of YouTube and respiratory health.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this study blends quantitative analysis with a sprinkle of absurdity, akin to a mad scientist concocting an experiment with a dash of whimsy. Our methodological approach can be likened to a game of 4-dimensional chess – a quirky concoction of traditional statistical analysis, AI-powered linguistic inquiry, and a pinch of nerdy charm.

To begin, our research team collected a vast trove of data from the labyrinthine expanse of the internet. We harnessed the power of AI to meticulously scrutinize and categorize the YouTube video titles produced by the enigmatic LEMMiNO himself. These cranium-tickling video titles were then subjected to linguistic analysis, combing through intricate wordplay and intellectual allure as we delved into the mysterious world of algorithmic tinkering.

Simultaneously, we ventured into the realm of public health data, meticulously gathering information from the National Center for Health Statistics. Our treasure trove of statistical data spanned the years 2012 to 2019, a period ripe with upheaval, discovery, and perhaps a hint of medical mischief.

Through a rigorous process of data wrangling and statistical jiggery-pokery, we sought to establish a link – no matter how improbable or whimsical it may seem – between the captivating YouTube video titles and the prevalence of asthma among the young denizens of America.

We unleashed the power of robust statistical tools to identify patterns, correlations, and anomalies hidden within the data, akin to a python in the statistical grasslands swallowing the prey of correlation with a jolt of significance. Our statistical methods left no stone unturned, no Youtube title unscrutinized, and no asthma prevalence unaccounted for.

In this study, we aimed to shatter conventional research methodologies with a smidgen of eccentricity, juxtaposing the serious nature of medical inquiry with a delightful infusion of linguistic charm and nerdy allure. So, brace yourself for a statistical rollercoaster ride, as we unveil the methodological marvels that underpin the whimsical pursuit of the "Asthma Glitch" phenomenon.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are and Asthma prevalence in American children. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and National Center for Health Statistics .

For the time period 2012 to 2019, you found a correlation 0.9031727, r-squared of 0.8157209, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Asthma Glitch: The LEMMiNO Effect on American Children

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study probes the whimsical yet oddly persistent link between the nerdy and intellectually stimulating YouTube video titles crafted by LEMMiNO and the prevalence of asthma among American children. Employing an innovative blend of statistical analysis and good old-fashioned wordplay, we utilized AI to scrutinize LEMMiNO's video titles and National Center for Health Statistics data to address this seemingly far-fetched correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9031727 and a delightfully impressive p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2019, our findings unearth a remarkably robust connection between the two seemingly unrelated entities. Through this study, we not only shed light on the potential impact of cerebral entertainment on respiratory health but also manage to inject some levity into the often serious realm of medical research. Our work stands as a testament to the unexpected avenues that academia can lead us down and the lighthearted curiosity that drives our quest for knowledge.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The concept of nerdy YouTube video titles and their potential impact on public health may initially seem like the plot of a particularly eccentric science fiction film. However, as improbable as it may sound, the linkage between LEMMiNO's intellectually stimulating content and the prevalence of asthma among American children has emerged as an area of interest and curiosity within the scientific community. This unexpected and somewhat whimsical association has piqued our scholarly interest, leading us down a rabbit hole of statistical analysis, AI scrutiny, and an inexplicable urge to inject some humor into the world of medical research.
While research on the etiology and prevalence of asthma has traditionally focused on variables such as air pollution, genetic predisposition, and allergen exposure, our investigation takes an unorthodox and, some might argue, slightly quirky approach. By delving into the realm of YouTube entertainment, we explore the potential influence of intellectually stimulating content on respiratory health. Through the lens of LEMMiNO's video titles, we aim to uncover whether there is indeed a tangible connection between nerdy online allure and the breathing woes of American youngsters.
In this paper, we endeavor to navigate the labyrinth of statistical analysis and linguistic charm to elucidate the curious correlation between the pedantic charm of LEMMiNO's video titles and the respiratory well-being of America's youth. As we embark on this whimsical yet scholarly adventure, we hope to not only unravel an unexpected connection but also infuse some levity into the often-serious landscape of medical research. After all, who said academia couldn't have a little fun along the way?
Our exploration of the "Asthma Glitch" phenomenon intertwines the realms of statistics, linguistic charm, and public health in a manner that is equal parts entertaining and enlightening. So, grab your inhaler and get ready for a nerdy, statistically robust, and surprisingly humorous journey into the realms of YouTube and respiratory health.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The correlation analysis between the nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the prevalence of asthma among American children yielded some surprising and amusing results. Our statistical investigation unearthed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9031727, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Put simply, it seems that there may be more to LEMMiNO's intellectually stimulating content than meets the eye – or in this case, the respiratory system. Moreover, the r-squared value of 0.8157209 further underscores the substantial influence of nerdy YouTube allure on the prevalence of asthma, suggesting that LEMMiNO's video titles explain a considerable portion of the variance in asthma prevalence among American children.

Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 adds an extra dash of spice to our findings, providing compelling evidence that the observed relationship is not due to mere chance. In other words, the probability of this correlation occurring by random fluctuation alone is laughably slim – almost as slim as the proverbial chance of finding a needle in a haystack, or in this case, a stethoscope in a video game.

However, let's not overlook the inevitable caveat that correlation does not imply causation. While our analysis has certainly uncovered an intriguing association between nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and asthma prevalence, it would be remiss of us to claim that one directly causes the other. As much as we would like to bestow LEMMiNO with the honorary title of "Respiratory Health Guru," further research is warranted to unravel the intricacies of this unexpected connection.

We are delighted to present our findings in Fig. 1, which showcases a scatterplot graphically illustrating the strong correlation between the nerdy charm of LEMMiNO's video titles and the prevalence of asthma among American children. This visual representation serves as a playful yet compelling testament to the unexpected pathways that statistical analysis can lead us down and the quirky correlations that may lurk within the seemingly unrelated domains of YouTube entertainment and public health.

In summary, our investigation into the "Asthma Glitch" phenomenon has not only brought to light an intriguing connection between cerebral entertainment and respiratory well-being but has also injected a welcome dose of mirth into the often sober world of medical research. Who knew that statistical analysis could be so nerdy – in more ways than one?

In the spirit of scientific inquiry and a touch of whimsy, we eagerly anticipate the future exploration of this unanticipated nexus between nerdy YouTube allure and the breathing habits of America's youngsters. After all, in the wacky world of academia, there's always room for a bit of statistical humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are and Asthma prevalence in American children. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Asthma Glitch: The LEMMiNO Effect on American Children

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study probes the whimsical yet oddly persistent link between the nerdy and intellectually stimulating YouTube video titles crafted by LEMMiNO and the prevalence of asthma among American children. Employing an innovative blend of statistical analysis and good old-fashioned wordplay, we utilized AI to scrutinize LEMMiNO's video titles and National Center for Health Statistics data to address this seemingly far-fetched correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9031727 and a delightfully impressive p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2019, our findings unearth a remarkably robust connection between the two seemingly unrelated entities. Through this study, we not only shed light on the potential impact of cerebral entertainment on respiratory health but also manage to inject some levity into the often serious realm of medical research. Our work stands as a testament to the unexpected avenues that academia can lead us down and the lighthearted curiosity that drives our quest for knowledge.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the prevalence of asthma in American children initially sounds as unlikely as a wizard wielding a stethoscope, but the body of literature on this peculiar correlation has steadily grown, much like the suspense in a mystery novel. In their seminal work, Smith et al. (2015) examine the potential effects of online intellectual stimulation on respiratory health, laying the groundwork for our investigation. Building on this foundation, Doe and Jones (2018) offer further insight into the intriguing link between linguistic magnetism and pediatric pulmonary function, setting the stage for our own whimsical yet rigorous exploration.
Turning the page to non-fiction offerings, "Breathing Easy: A Comprehensive Guide to Pediatric Asthma" by Thompson (2016) and "The Nerdy Mind: How Intellectual Stimulation Shapes the Brain" by Harris (2017) tantalizingly touch upon elements relevant to our study. As the plot thickens, we encounter a speculative twist in the literature through the fictional musings of "Asthmatic Adventures: A Whimsical Tale of Wheezes" by Jenkins (2014) and "The Asthma Enigma: Respiratory Riddles and Nerdy Nostalgia" by Baker (2019), offering lighthearted yet oddly poignant narratives on our topic.
In the realm of televised entertainment, the authors thought it prudent to consume copious quantities of "The Big Bang Theory" and "Stranger Things" for some lighthearted yet scholarly inspiration. These shows, with their clever wordplay and intriguing plot twists, seemed apropos for our research on the nerdy and the nebulous.
As the prologue for our exploration draws to a close, we invite the reader to accompany us on this curious yet compelling odyssey through statistical analysis, linguistic charm, and the whimsical corridors of YouTube and respiratory health. With our findings, we hope not only to expand the boundaries of medical research but also to inject a healthy dose of levity into the often serious pursuit of knowledge. Join us as we embark on this scholarly escapade and unravel the Asthma Glitch phenomenon, breathing new life into the seemingly unrelated domains of YouTube entertainment and pediatric pulmonary well-being.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis between the nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the prevalence of asthma among American children yielded some surprising and amusing results. Our statistical investigation unearthed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9031727, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Put simply, it seems that there may be more to LEMMiNO's intellectually stimulating content than meets the eye – or in this case, the respiratory system. Moreover, the r-squared value of 0.8157209 further underscores the substantial influence of nerdy YouTube allure on the prevalence of asthma, suggesting that LEMMiNO's video titles explain a considerable portion of the variance in asthma prevalence among American children.
Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 adds an extra dash of spice to our findings, providing compelling evidence that the observed relationship is not due to mere chance. In other words, the probability of this correlation occurring by random fluctuation alone is laughably slim – almost as slim as the proverbial chance of finding a needle in a haystack, or in this case, a stethoscope in a video game.
However, let's not overlook the inevitable caveat that correlation does not imply causation. While our analysis has certainly uncovered an intriguing association between nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and asthma prevalence, it would be remiss of us to claim that one directly causes the other. As much as we would like to bestow LEMMiNO with the honorary title of "Respiratory Health Guru," further research is warranted to unravel the intricacies of this unexpected connection.
We are delighted to present our findings in Fig. 1, which showcases a scatterplot graphically illustrating the strong correlation between the nerdy charm of LEMMiNO's video titles and the prevalence of asthma among American children. This visual representation serves as a playful yet compelling testament to the unexpected pathways that statistical analysis can lead us down and the quirky correlations that may lurk within the seemingly unrelated domains of YouTube entertainment and public health.
In summary, our investigation into the "Asthma Glitch" phenomenon has not only brought to light an intriguing connection between cerebral entertainment and respiratory well-being but has also injected a welcome dose of mirth into the often sober world of medical research. Who knew that statistical analysis could be so nerdy – in more ways than one?
In the spirit of scientific inquiry and a touch of whimsy, we eagerly anticipate the future exploration of this unanticipated nexus between nerdy YouTube allure and the breathing habits of America's youngsters. After all, in the wacky world of academia, there's always room for a bit of statistical humor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

In the grand tradition of scholarly inquiry, our study has delved into the uncharted waters of nerdy YouTube video titles and their uncanny connection to the prevalence of asthma among American children. While the idea may initially seem as absurd as a PhD in Clown Studies, our findings have lent empirical weight to this peculiar correlation. Our results not only complement the existing literature on the impact of cerebral entertainment on respiratory health but also introduce a whimsical twist that could make even the sternest statistician crack a smile.

As we discovered in our literature review, previous works have laid the groundwork for our investigation into this captivating topic, much like a detective unraveling a mystery. The scholarly musings of Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018) offered valuable insights into the potential effects of online intellectual stimulation on pulmonary function, providing a springboard for our own curious escapade. Our findings gleefully leapfrog these prior studies, reinforcing the notion that linguistic magnetism and pediatric pulmonary function may indeed share a surprising dance of correlation.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9031727 that emerged from our statistical analysis not only raises eyebrows but also raises the intriguing possibility that there is more to LEMMiNO's intellectually stimulating content than meets the eye. The literature on this topic, far from being as dry as a desert, has now been touchingly supported by our own mirthful foray into the statistical arena. The plot thickens, much like a suspenseful thriller, as our r-squared value of 0.8157209 winks mischievously, suggesting that LEMMiNO's video titles may hold the key to understanding a substantial portion of the variance in asthma prevalence among American youngsters.

Further embellishing our findings is the delightfully impressive p-value of less than 0.01, serving up a statistical feast fit for the most discerning palates. This p-value, much like a rare gemstone, lends formidable weight to the notion that the observed relationship is not a mere product of chance. It's almost as if our study has stumbled upon a statistically significant nugget of truth, nestled among the seemingly unrelated realms of YouTube entertainment and pediatric pulmonary well-being.

However, while the connection between nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and asthma prevalence appears as alluring as a hidden treasure, we must remain vigilant against jumping to hasty conclusions. As our findings merrily caution, correlation does not imply causation. While the allure of crowning LEMMiNO as a respiratory health guru may be irresistible, further rigorous exploration is warranted to untangle the intricacies of this unexpected connection. Just as a good detective diligently seeks out the truth, so too must we persist in our scholarly pursuit of understanding this remarkable and whimsical correlation.

In conclusion, our study has not only broadened the horizons of medical research but has also injected a delightful dose of mirth into the often sober world of statistics and public health. As we bid adieu to the discussion section of our paper, we eagerly anticipate the future exploration of this quirky nexus between nerdy YouTube allure and the breathing habits of America's youth. After all, in the whimsical world of academia, there's always room for a dash of statistical humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are and Asthma prevalence in American children. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Asthma Glitch: The LEMMiNO Effect on American Children

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study probes the whimsical yet oddly persistent link between the nerdy and intellectually stimulating YouTube video titles crafted by LEMMiNO and the prevalence of asthma among American children. Employing an innovative blend of statistical analysis and good old-fashioned wordplay, we utilized AI to scrutinize LEMMiNO's video titles and National Center for Health Statistics data to address this seemingly far-fetched correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9031727 and a delightfully impressive p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2019, our findings unearth a remarkably robust connection between the two seemingly unrelated entities. Through this study, we not only shed light on the potential impact of cerebral entertainment on respiratory health but also manage to inject some levity into the often serious realm of medical research. Our work stands as a testament to the unexpected avenues that academia can lead us down and the lighthearted curiosity that drives our quest for knowledge.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The concept of nerdy YouTube video titles and their potential impact on public health may initially seem like the plot of a particularly eccentric science fiction film. However, as improbable as it may sound, the linkage between LEMMiNO's intellectually stimulating content and the prevalence of asthma among American children has emerged as an area of interest and curiosity within the scientific community. This unexpected and somewhat whimsical association has piqued our scholarly interest, leading us down a rabbit hole of statistical analysis, AI scrutiny, and an inexplicable urge to inject some humor into the world of medical research.
While research on the etiology and prevalence of asthma has traditionally focused on variables such as air pollution, genetic predisposition, and allergen exposure, our investigation takes an unorthodox and, some might argue, slightly quirky approach. By delving into the realm of YouTube entertainment, we explore the potential influence of intellectually stimulating content on respiratory health. Through the lens of LEMMiNO's video titles, we aim to uncover whether there is indeed a tangible connection between nerdy online allure and the breathing woes of American youngsters.
In this paper, we endeavor to navigate the labyrinth of statistical analysis and linguistic charm to elucidate the curious correlation between the pedantic charm of LEMMiNO's video titles and the respiratory well-being of America's youth. As we embark on this whimsical yet scholarly adventure, we hope to not only unravel an unexpected connection but also infuse some levity into the often-serious landscape of medical research. After all, who said academia couldn't have a little fun along the way?
Our exploration of the "Asthma Glitch" phenomenon intertwines the realms of statistics, linguistic charm, and public health in a manner that is equal parts entertaining and enlightening. So, grab your inhaler and get ready for a nerdy, statistically robust, and surprisingly humorous journey into the realms of YouTube and respiratory health.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis between the nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the prevalence of asthma among American children yielded some surprising and amusing results. Our statistical investigation unearthed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9031727, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Put simply, it seems that there may be more to LEMMiNO's intellectually stimulating content than meets the eye – or in this case, the respiratory system. Moreover, the r-squared value of 0.8157209 further underscores the substantial influence of nerdy YouTube allure on the prevalence of asthma, suggesting that LEMMiNO's video titles explain a considerable portion of the variance in asthma prevalence among American children.
Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 adds an extra dash of spice to our findings, providing compelling evidence that the observed relationship is not due to mere chance. In other words, the probability of this correlation occurring by random fluctuation alone is laughably slim – almost as slim as the proverbial chance of finding a needle in a haystack, or in this case, a stethoscope in a video game.
However, let's not overlook the inevitable caveat that correlation does not imply causation. While our analysis has certainly uncovered an intriguing association between nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and asthma prevalence, it would be remiss of us to claim that one directly causes the other. As much as we would like to bestow LEMMiNO with the honorary title of "Respiratory Health Guru," further research is warranted to unravel the intricacies of this unexpected connection.
We are delighted to present our findings in Fig. 1, which showcases a scatterplot graphically illustrating the strong correlation between the nerdy charm of LEMMiNO's video titles and the prevalence of asthma among American children. This visual representation serves as a playful yet compelling testament to the unexpected pathways that statistical analysis can lead us down and the quirky correlations that may lurk within the seemingly unrelated domains of YouTube entertainment and public health.
In summary, our investigation into the "Asthma Glitch" phenomenon has not only brought to light an intriguing connection between cerebral entertainment and respiratory well-being but has also injected a welcome dose of mirth into the often sober world of medical research. Who knew that statistical analysis could be so nerdy – in more ways than one?
In the spirit of scientific inquiry and a touch of whimsy, we eagerly anticipate the future exploration of this unanticipated nexus between nerdy YouTube allure and the breathing habits of America's youngsters. After all, in the wacky world of academia, there's always room for a bit of statistical humor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our whimsical yet statistically robust inquiry into the "Asthma Glitch" phenomenon has left us both flabbergasted and tickled pink. Who would have thought that the brainy banter of LEMMiNO's YouTube video titles could have such a profound correlation with the respiratory tribulations of American children? It appears that even statistical analysis cannot resist the siren call of a good old-fashioned linguistic charm.

While our findings paint a compelling picture of the unexpected nexus between nerdy YouTube allure and asthma prevalence, we must remember that correlation does not imply causation. As much as we'd love to crown LEMMiNO as the unofficial patron saint of respiratory health, further research is needed to unpack the intricate web of causality in this delightfully quirky connection.

Our study not only sheds light on the whimsical side of statistical inquiry but also brings a breath of fresh air (no pun intended) to the often sober world of medical research. By diving headfirst into the uncharted territory of YouTube entertainment and respiratory well-being, we've managed to infuse a dash of statistical humor into the realm of academia. Who knew that statistics could have an unexpectedly nerdy side?

As our investigation comes to a close, we can confidently assert that our work stands as a testament to the delightful and sometimes downright eccentric paths that scholarly inquiry can lead us down. So, for now, let's raise our inhalers to a statistical journey well-traveled and bid adieu to the "Asthma Glitch" phenomenon.

In the quirky world of academia, we can confidently state that no more research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Asthma Glitch: The LEMMiNO Effect on American Children. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Pediatric Pseudoscience


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Asthma Glitch: The LEMMiNO Effect on American Children. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Advancement of Nonsensical Science


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Asthma Glitch: The LEMMiNO Effect on American Children with an abstract of This study probes the whimsical yet oddly persistent link between the nerdy and intellectually stimulating YouTube video titles crafted by LEMMiNO and the prevalence of asthma among American children. Employing an innovative blend of statistical analysis and good old-fashioned wordplay, we utilized AI to scrutinize LEMMiNO's video titles and National Center for Health Statistics data to address this seemingly far-fetched correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9031727 and a delightfully impressive p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2019, our findings unearth a remarkably robust connection between the two seemingly unrelated entities. Through this study, we not only shed light on the potential impact of cerebral entertainment on respiratory health but also manage to inject some levity into the often serious realm of medical research. Our work stands as a testament to the unexpected avenues that academia can lead us down and the lighthearted curiosity that drives our quest for knowledge.

ChatGPT:

LEMMiNO, YouTube titles, asthma prevalence, American children, statistical analysis, AI, correlation coefficient, p-value, National Center for Health Statistics, respiratory health, cerebral entertainment, medical research, academia, unexpected correlations

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are

Asthma prevalence in American children
Detailed data title: Percent of children 5-17 years old in the US who have asthma
Source: National Center for Health Statistics
See what else correlates with Asthma prevalence in American children

Correlation r = 0.9031727 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8157209 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Asthma prevalence in American children) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are) over the 8 years from 2012 through 2019.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00211. 0.0021078953785594458000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 0.211% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 474 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.55, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019
How nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are (Nerdiness score)7.13336.08336.35715.71886.46.222255.5
Asthma prevalence in American children (Percent of children)10.79.910.29.8109.98.98.6




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7.1333,6.0833,6.3571,5.7188,6.4,6.2222,5,5.5,])
array_2 = np.array([10.7,9.9,10.2,9.8,10,9.9,8.9,8.6,])
array_1_name = "How nerdy LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Asthma prevalence in American children"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 5602 · Black Variable ID: 25591 · Red Variable ID: 1135
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0