about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,599 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Princess and the second variable is Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Alabama.  The chart goes from 1976 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Perhaps there was a secret campaign where every time someone named their child Princess, a tiny tiara-wearing elephant mascot showed up to win over voters. The cuteness factor must have swayed some opinions! It's a royal Republican ripple effect.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a charming small town scene blending cyber and folk aesthetics. In the center of a cozy Alabama town square, a joyful baby girl named Princess giggles as she watches a small, sleek, cybernetic elephant mascot wearing a glitzy tiara gracefully dancing. The town hall stands tall in the background, with a line of smiling voters eager to cast their ballots for the Republican Presidential candidate, their hearts swayed by the adorable sight of the tiny tiara-wearing elephant. The scene exudes a sense of heartwarming cheer and cultural fusion, showcasing the intersection of traditional charm and futuristic whimsy. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Princess and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Alabama. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image Parallax art Cutsy art illustration Cyber folk Sci-fi fantacy
ChatGPT: Cyber folk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Princess and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Alabama, in the following situation: Perhaps there was a secret campaign where every time someone named their child Princess, a tiny tiara-wearing elephant mascot showed up to win over voters. The cuteness factor must have swayed some opinions! It's a royal Republican ripple effect.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small Alabama town, a baby girl named Princess giggles as a tiny tiara-wearing elephant mascot does a little dance nearby. Outside the town hall, voters smile and wave as they line up to cast their votes for the Republican Presidential candidate. The adorable sight of the mascot seems to have won over some hearts, causing a ripple effect of support for the royal Republican cause.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyber folk ] and depicting this scene: In a small Alabama town, a baby girl named Princess giggles as a tiny tiara-wearing elephant mascot does a little dance nearby. Outside the town hall, voters smile and wave as they line up to cast their votes for the Republican Presidential candidate. The adorable sight of the mascot seems to have won over some hearts, causing a ripple effect of support for the royal Republican cause. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a charming small town scene blending cyber and folk aesthetics. In the center of a cozy Alabama town square, a joyful baby girl named Princess giggles as she watches a small, sleek, cybernetic elephant mascot wearing a glitzy tiara gracefully dancing. The town hall stands tall in the background, with a line of smiling voters eager to cast their ballots for the Republican Presidential candidate, their hearts swayed by the adorable sight of the tiny tiara-wearing elephant. The scene exudes a sense of heartwarming cheer and cultural fusion, showcasing the intersection of traditional charm and futuristic whimsy.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Princess caused Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Alabama to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Princess and the Polls: A Potent Partnership or Purely Peculiar Phenomenon?

The Journal of Whimsical Social Psychology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Princess and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8944124 and p < 0.01 for 1976 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Princess and the Polls: A Potent Partnership or Purely Peculiar Phenomenon?

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between the popularity of the first name "Princess" and voting behavior in Alabama for Republican presidential candidates has long been a subject of curiosity. In this study, we utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to delve into this whimsical correlation. Our analysis spans the years 1976 to 2020, encompassing a significant period of political shifts and the evolution of baby naming trends.

Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8944124 with a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the prevalence of the name "Princess" and supporting Republican candidates in the state of Alabama. This correlation, while statistically significant, raises the question: is it a case of causation or just a royal coincidence?

Dad joke alert: Why did the princess refuse to vote for the Republican candidate? Because she heard they were "reining" in her possibilities!

The implications of this unlikely link extend beyond mere amusement, shedding light on the intersection of cultural phenomena and political inclinations. This study contributes to the interdisciplinary dialogue on the peculiar influences on voter behavior and the unanticipated impact of seemingly unrelated societal trends.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Princess and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Princess and the Polls: A Potent Partnership or Purely Peculiar Phenomenon?

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between the popularity of the first name "Princess" and voting behavior in Alabama for Republican presidential candidates has long been a subject of curiosity. In this study, we utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to delve into this whimsical correlation. Our analysis spans the years 1976 to 2020, encompassing a significant period of political shifts and the evolution of baby naming trends.

Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8944124 with a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the prevalence of the name "Princess" and supporting Republican candidates in the state of Alabama. This correlation, while statistically significant, raises the question: is it a case of causation or just a royal coincidence?

Dad joke alert: Why did the princess refuse to vote for the Republican candidate? Because she heard they were "reining" in her possibilities!

The implications of this unlikely link extend beyond mere amusement, shedding light on the intersection of cultural phenomena and political inclinations. This study contributes to the interdisciplinary dialogue on the peculiar influences on voter behavior and the unanticipated impact of seemingly unrelated societal trends.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between naming trends and political preferences has been a source of both fascination and bewilderment in academic circles. Among the countless curiosities that exist within this realm, perhaps none is more enigmatic than the association between the popularity of the first name "Princess" and the voting behavior for Republican presidential candidates in the state of Alabama. This study endeavors to explore this curious correlation, infusing a dash of whimsy into the typically staid realm of political analysis.

Dad joke alert: What did the princess say about the Alabama voting results? "It's a crownslide victory for the Republicans!"

The allure of investigating such a peculiar correlation lies in its potential to unravel the intricate web of socio-political dynamics that often elude conventional understanding. As such, this study marks an earnest attempt to decipher whether the popularity of the name "Princess" exerts a discernible influence on the voting patterns in the deeply conservative state of Alabama.

Dad joke alert: When asked about the statistical significance of the correlation, the researchers replied, "It's royally significant!"

The empirical foundation of this inquiry rests upon the utilization of comprehensive datasets sourced from reliable repositories, offering an expansive chronological scope from 1976 to 2020. By leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, this analysis underscores the importance of robust data in unraveling the enigma surrounding the "Princess" phenomenon.

The satirical undertone of this investigation belies the serious implications it carries, opening avenues for contemplation on the unintended consequences of cultural cues on political inclinations. Despite the inherent levity of its subject matter, this study assumes a scholarly posture, seeking to contribute meaningfully to the evolving discourse on the complex interplay between nomenclature trends and electoral choices.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Princess and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Princess and the Polls: A Potent Partnership or Purely Peculiar Phenomenon?

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between the popularity of the first name "Princess" and voting behavior in Alabama for Republican presidential candidates has long been a subject of curiosity. In this study, we utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to delve into this whimsical correlation. Our analysis spans the years 1976 to 2020, encompassing a significant period of political shifts and the evolution of baby naming trends.

Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8944124 with a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the prevalence of the name "Princess" and supporting Republican candidates in the state of Alabama. This correlation, while statistically significant, raises the question: is it a case of causation or just a royal coincidence?

Dad joke alert: Why did the princess refuse to vote for the Republican candidate? Because she heard they were "reining" in her possibilities!

The implications of this unlikely link extend beyond mere amusement, shedding light on the intersection of cultural phenomena and political inclinations. This study contributes to the interdisciplinary dialogue on the peculiar influences on voter behavior and the unanticipated impact of seemingly unrelated societal trends.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between naming trends and political preferences has been a source of both fascination and bewilderment in academic circles. Among the countless curiosities that exist within this realm, perhaps none is more enigmatic than the association between the popularity of the first name "Princess" and the voting behavior for Republican presidential candidates in the state of Alabama. This study endeavors to explore this curious correlation, infusing a dash of whimsy into the typically staid realm of political analysis.
Dad joke alert: What did the princess say about the Alabama voting results? "It's a crownslide victory for the Republicans!"
The allure of investigating such a peculiar correlation lies in its potential to unravel the intricate web of socio-political dynamics that often elude conventional understanding. As such, this study marks an earnest attempt to decipher whether the popularity of the name "Princess" exerts a discernible influence on the voting patterns in the deeply conservative state of Alabama.
Dad joke alert: When asked about the statistical significance of the correlation, the researchers replied, "It's royally significant!"
The empirical foundation of this inquiry rests upon the utilization of comprehensive datasets sourced from reliable repositories, offering an expansive chronological scope from 1976 to 2020. By leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, this analysis underscores the importance of robust data in unraveling the enigma surrounding the "Princess" phenomenon.
The satirical undertone of this investigation belies the serious implications it carries, opening avenues for contemplation on the unintended consequences of cultural cues on political inclinations. Despite the inherent levity of its subject matter, this study assumes a scholarly posture, seeking to contribute meaningfully to the evolving discourse on the complex interplay between nomenclature trends and electoral choices.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The association between naming trends and political leanings has been the focus of scholarly investigation, with studies revealing intriguing insights into the societal influences on individual behaviors. Smith et al. (2014) demonstrated a correlation between traditional gender-specific names and ideological affiliations, shedding light on the nuanced connection between nomenclature and political inclinations. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2016) examined the impact of unconventional names on voting behavior, emphasizing the potential for symbolic associations to influence electoral choices.

In "The Power of Names," the authors find that individuals with names carrying regal connotations may exhibit distinct behavioral predilections, thus laying the groundwork for our curiosity about the correlation between the first name "Princess" and Republican voting patterns in Alabama.

Dad joke alert: Why did the princess always carry a ruler? Because she wanted to "rule" in favor of the Republican candidate!

The realm of pop culture has also provided compelling narratives that intersect with our unconventional inquiry. In "The Princess Diaries," the authors expound upon the portrayal of aristocratic identities and the potential implications for political allegiances. Intertwining this notion with our investigation propels our study into the whimsical and thought-provoking domain of cultural influences on voting behavior. Further, in "The Prince and the Pauper," the thematic juxtaposition of divergent societal standings presents an allegorical framework that resonates with our exploration of the "Princess" phenomenon.

Dad joke alert: Why did the prince refuse to run for political office? Because he didn't want to relinquish his "throne!"

Expanding our perspective to the realm of children's entertainment, an analysis of classic fairy tales and animated series informs our understanding of the societal perceptions associated with royal identities. Shows such as "Sofia the First" and "Elena of Avalor" offer subtle cues that contribute to the allure of royal nomenclature, potentially influencing perceptions and, consequently, electoral nuances.

As our inquiry transcends conventional paradigms of political research, it remains imperative to combine scholarly rigor with a hint of mirth, recognizing the duality inherent in exploring such atypical correlations. While the interplay of name popularity and voting behavior may initially evoke amusement, the implications stemming from this investigation provide fertile ground for contemplation and, dare we say, a sprinkle of royal levity in academic discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Princess and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1976 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Princess and the Polls: A Potent Partnership or Purely Peculiar Phenomenon?

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between the popularity of the first name "Princess" and voting behavior in Alabama for Republican presidential candidates has long been a subject of curiosity. In this study, we utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to delve into this whimsical correlation. Our analysis spans the years 1976 to 2020, encompassing a significant period of political shifts and the evolution of baby naming trends.

Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8944124 with a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the prevalence of the name "Princess" and supporting Republican candidates in the state of Alabama. This correlation, while statistically significant, raises the question: is it a case of causation or just a royal coincidence?

Dad joke alert: Why did the princess refuse to vote for the Republican candidate? Because she heard they were "reining" in her possibilities!

The implications of this unlikely link extend beyond mere amusement, shedding light on the intersection of cultural phenomena and political inclinations. This study contributes to the interdisciplinary dialogue on the peculiar influences on voter behavior and the unanticipated impact of seemingly unrelated societal trends.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between naming trends and political preferences has been a source of both fascination and bewilderment in academic circles. Among the countless curiosities that exist within this realm, perhaps none is more enigmatic than the association between the popularity of the first name "Princess" and the voting behavior for Republican presidential candidates in the state of Alabama. This study endeavors to explore this curious correlation, infusing a dash of whimsy into the typically staid realm of political analysis.
Dad joke alert: What did the princess say about the Alabama voting results? "It's a crownslide victory for the Republicans!"
The allure of investigating such a peculiar correlation lies in its potential to unravel the intricate web of socio-political dynamics that often elude conventional understanding. As such, this study marks an earnest attempt to decipher whether the popularity of the name "Princess" exerts a discernible influence on the voting patterns in the deeply conservative state of Alabama.
Dad joke alert: When asked about the statistical significance of the correlation, the researchers replied, "It's royally significant!"
The empirical foundation of this inquiry rests upon the utilization of comprehensive datasets sourced from reliable repositories, offering an expansive chronological scope from 1976 to 2020. By leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, this analysis underscores the importance of robust data in unraveling the enigma surrounding the "Princess" phenomenon.
The satirical undertone of this investigation belies the serious implications it carries, opening avenues for contemplation on the unintended consequences of cultural cues on political inclinations. Despite the inherent levity of its subject matter, this study assumes a scholarly posture, seeking to contribute meaningfully to the evolving discourse on the complex interplay between nomenclature trends and electoral choices.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The present study employed a multifaceted approach to unravel the mystifying connection between the prevalence of the first name "Princess" and voting behavior for Republican presidential candidates in Alabama. The research team embarked on an exhaustive data collection mission, traversing the digital landscape like intrepid explorers in search of elusive clues.

To initiate the investigation, we meticulously assembled datasets from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. These repositories provided a rich tapestry of information spanning the years 1976 to 2020, capturing the ebb and flow of naming trends and political proclivities over the decades.

In a bid to ensure the comprehensiveness of our analysis, we employed an algorithmic marvel, affectionately dubbed the "Nametron 3000," which scoured online archives, election databases, and social media platforms to unearth occurrences of the name "Princess" in the context of Alabama's political landscape. This algorithm, armed with a surplus of computational prowess, navigated the digital realm with virtuosic precision, identifying and cataloging instances of the name with unparalleled dexterity.

To further augment the depth of our inquiry, we embraced a blend of quantitative and qualitative methods, understanding that the intricate interplay of naming patterns and voting behavior demanded a multifaceted approach. The quantitative component entailed the calculation of correlation coefficients and the derivation of p-values, employing statistical tools with the solemnity of acolytes in the temple of data.

Dad joke alert: Why was the "Nametron 3000" such a hit at parties? Because it always knew how to "name-drop" with flair!

Furthermore, the qualitative facet of our analysis involved a foray into ethnographic exploration, engaging in poignant conversations with individuals bearing the name "Princess." These interactions, though anecdotal in nature, provided invaluable insights into the societal perceptions and personal influences associated with carrying such a regal moniker.

Having amassed a treasure trove of data and insights, we undertook a rigorous process of data cleaning and validation, akin to tending a meticulous garden of statistical veracity. Once the data underwent meticulous scrutiny, we fashioned an analytical framework that teased out the nuances of the "Princess" phenomenon, unveiling its enigmatic relationship with political affiliations in the heart of Dixie.

In summary, the methodology adopted in this study reflects a blend of technological ingenuity, methodological diversity, and a relentless pursuit of scholarly whimsy, underscoring the preeminence of exhaustive inquiry tempered with a hint of levity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Princess and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1976 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8944124, r-squared of 0.7999736, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Princess and the Polls: A Potent Partnership or Purely Peculiar Phenomenon?

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between the popularity of the first name "Princess" and voting behavior in Alabama for Republican presidential candidates has long been a subject of curiosity. In this study, we utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to delve into this whimsical correlation. Our analysis spans the years 1976 to 2020, encompassing a significant period of political shifts and the evolution of baby naming trends.

Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8944124 with a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the prevalence of the name "Princess" and supporting Republican candidates in the state of Alabama. This correlation, while statistically significant, raises the question: is it a case of causation or just a royal coincidence?

Dad joke alert: Why did the princess refuse to vote for the Republican candidate? Because she heard they were "reining" in her possibilities!

The implications of this unlikely link extend beyond mere amusement, shedding light on the intersection of cultural phenomena and political inclinations. This study contributes to the interdisciplinary dialogue on the peculiar influences on voter behavior and the unanticipated impact of seemingly unrelated societal trends.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between naming trends and political preferences has been a source of both fascination and bewilderment in academic circles. Among the countless curiosities that exist within this realm, perhaps none is more enigmatic than the association between the popularity of the first name "Princess" and the voting behavior for Republican presidential candidates in the state of Alabama. This study endeavors to explore this curious correlation, infusing a dash of whimsy into the typically staid realm of political analysis.
Dad joke alert: What did the princess say about the Alabama voting results? "It's a crownslide victory for the Republicans!"
The allure of investigating such a peculiar correlation lies in its potential to unravel the intricate web of socio-political dynamics that often elude conventional understanding. As such, this study marks an earnest attempt to decipher whether the popularity of the name "Princess" exerts a discernible influence on the voting patterns in the deeply conservative state of Alabama.
Dad joke alert: When asked about the statistical significance of the correlation, the researchers replied, "It's royally significant!"
The empirical foundation of this inquiry rests upon the utilization of comprehensive datasets sourced from reliable repositories, offering an expansive chronological scope from 1976 to 2020. By leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, this analysis underscores the importance of robust data in unraveling the enigma surrounding the "Princess" phenomenon.
The satirical undertone of this investigation belies the serious implications it carries, opening avenues for contemplation on the unintended consequences of cultural cues on political inclinations. Despite the inherent levity of its subject matter, this study assumes a scholarly posture, seeking to contribute meaningfully to the evolving discourse on the complex interplay between nomenclature trends and electoral choices.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Princess" and voting behavior in Alabama for Republican presidential candidates yielded an impressive correlation coefficient of 0.8944124. This strong correlation suggests a substantial association between the popularity of the name "Princess" and support for Republican candidates in the state. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7999736 further underscores the robustness of this relationship.

Dad joke alert: Why did the princess refuse to vote for the Republican candidate? Because she heard they were "reining" in her possibilities!

The statistical significance of the correlation, with a p-value less than 0.01, highlights the reliability and strength of this association. The magnitude of this correlation prompts contemplation on the potential influence of cultural phenomena on voter behavior and the broader implications for political analysis.

Figure 1 illustrates the pronounced correlation between the prevalence of the name "Princess" and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Alabama, further substantiating the quantitative findings of this study.

The surprising strength of this correlation challenges traditional notions of the factors shaping political preferences, inviting further inquiry into the intricate interplay between cultural influences and electoral dynamics. This unexpected connection adds a touch of whimsy to the often rigorous realm of political analysis, underscoring the multifaceted nature of voter behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Princess and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Princess and the Polls: A Potent Partnership or Purely Peculiar Phenomenon?

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between the popularity of the first name "Princess" and voting behavior in Alabama for Republican presidential candidates has long been a subject of curiosity. In this study, we utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to delve into this whimsical correlation. Our analysis spans the years 1976 to 2020, encompassing a significant period of political shifts and the evolution of baby naming trends.

Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8944124 with a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the prevalence of the name "Princess" and supporting Republican candidates in the state of Alabama. This correlation, while statistically significant, raises the question: is it a case of causation or just a royal coincidence?

Dad joke alert: Why did the princess refuse to vote for the Republican candidate? Because she heard they were "reining" in her possibilities!

The implications of this unlikely link extend beyond mere amusement, shedding light on the intersection of cultural phenomena and political inclinations. This study contributes to the interdisciplinary dialogue on the peculiar influences on voter behavior and the unanticipated impact of seemingly unrelated societal trends.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The association between naming trends and political leanings has been the focus of scholarly investigation, with studies revealing intriguing insights into the societal influences on individual behaviors. Smith et al. (2014) demonstrated a correlation between traditional gender-specific names and ideological affiliations, shedding light on the nuanced connection between nomenclature and political inclinations. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2016) examined the impact of unconventional names on voting behavior, emphasizing the potential for symbolic associations to influence electoral choices.
In "The Power of Names," the authors find that individuals with names carrying regal connotations may exhibit distinct behavioral predilections, thus laying the groundwork for our curiosity about the correlation between the first name "Princess" and Republican voting patterns in Alabama.
Dad joke alert: Why did the princess always carry a ruler? Because she wanted to "rule" in favor of the Republican candidate!
The realm of pop culture has also provided compelling narratives that intersect with our unconventional inquiry. In "The Princess Diaries," the authors expound upon the portrayal of aristocratic identities and the potential implications for political allegiances. Intertwining this notion with our investigation propels our study into the whimsical and thought-provoking domain of cultural influences on voting behavior. Further, in "The Prince and the Pauper," the thematic juxtaposition of divergent societal standings presents an allegorical framework that resonates with our exploration of the "Princess" phenomenon.
Dad joke alert: Why did the prince refuse to run for political office? Because he didn't want to relinquish his "throne!"
Expanding our perspective to the realm of children's entertainment, an analysis of classic fairy tales and animated series informs our understanding of the societal perceptions associated with royal identities. Shows such as "Sofia the First" and "Elena of Avalor" offer subtle cues that contribute to the allure of royal nomenclature, potentially influencing perceptions and, consequently, electoral nuances.
As our inquiry transcends conventional paradigms of political research, it remains imperative to combine scholarly rigor with a hint of mirth, recognizing the duality inherent in exploring such atypical correlations. While the interplay of name popularity and voting behavior may initially evoke amusement, the implications stemming from this investigation provide fertile ground for contemplation and, dare we say, a sprinkle of royal levity in academic discourse.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Princess" and voting behavior in Alabama for Republican presidential candidates yielded an impressive correlation coefficient of 0.8944124. This strong correlation suggests a substantial association between the popularity of the name "Princess" and support for Republican candidates in the state. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7999736 further underscores the robustness of this relationship.
Dad joke alert: Why did the princess refuse to vote for the Republican candidate? Because she heard they were "reining" in her possibilities!
The statistical significance of the correlation, with a p-value less than 0.01, highlights the reliability and strength of this association. The magnitude of this correlation prompts contemplation on the potential influence of cultural phenomena on voter behavior and the broader implications for political analysis.
Figure 1 illustrates the pronounced correlation between the prevalence of the name "Princess" and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Alabama, further substantiating the quantitative findings of this study.
The surprising strength of this correlation challenges traditional notions of the factors shaping political preferences, inviting further inquiry into the intricate interplay between cultural influences and electoral dynamics. This unexpected connection adds a touch of whimsy to the often rigorous realm of political analysis, underscoring the multifaceted nature of voter behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study offer compelling evidence supporting a robust association between the popularity of the first name "Princess" and voting behavior in Alabama for Republican presidential candidates. The substantial correlation coefficient, as well as the statistical significance of the relationship, underscores the intriguing interplay between cultural phenomena and political inclinations. These results resonate with prior research, aligning with the work of Smith et al. (2014) and Doe and Jones (2016) who illuminated the impact of names on ideological affiliations.

Dad joke alert: Why don't princes fight in wars? They prefer to reign in peace! In line with the unexpected nature of our inquiry, these findings add an element of lightheartedness to the traditionally solemn realm of political analysis.

Our results echo the insights of "The Power of Names," which suggested that individuals with names carrying regal connotations may exhibit distinct behavioral predilections. This highlights the quirkiness of societal phenomena and their potential influence on electoral choices. Furthermore, the comedic interjection within our literature review, exemplified by the princess carrying a ruler and refusing to run for political office, playfully reflects the serious implications of our investigation.

The compelling correlation coefficient of 0.8944124 not only reaffirms the interaction between the name "Princess" and support for Republican candidates in Alabama but also challenges conventional perceptions of the factors shaping voter behavior. The pronounced magnitude of this correlation invites further exploration into the intricate dynamics of cultural influences and political preferences.

Dad joke alert: Why did the princess bring a ladder to the voting booth? She wanted to "climb" to a better understanding of the political landscape!

The unexpected alignment of princess popularity and political preferences underscores the multifaceted nature of voter behavior and adds a whimsical touch to the often rigorous domain of electoral analysis. This study, with its blend of mirth and scholarly rigor, provides fertile ground for contemplation and underscores the rich tapestry of influences shaping political inclinations.

The unexpected whimsy of this connection between the first name "Princess" and voting behavior in Alabama exemplifies the delightful surprises that can emerge when delving into the intersection of seemingly unrelated societal trends. While the implications of this correlation extend beyond mere amusement, they serve as a reminder of the unexpected and unconventional influences that underpin the complex fabric of voter behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Princess and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Princess and the Polls: A Potent Partnership or Purely Peculiar Phenomenon?

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between the popularity of the first name "Princess" and voting behavior in Alabama for Republican presidential candidates has long been a subject of curiosity. In this study, we utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to delve into this whimsical correlation. Our analysis spans the years 1976 to 2020, encompassing a significant period of political shifts and the evolution of baby naming trends.

Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8944124 with a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the prevalence of the name "Princess" and supporting Republican candidates in the state of Alabama. This correlation, while statistically significant, raises the question: is it a case of causation or just a royal coincidence?

Dad joke alert: Why did the princess refuse to vote for the Republican candidate? Because she heard they were "reining" in her possibilities!

The implications of this unlikely link extend beyond mere amusement, shedding light on the intersection of cultural phenomena and political inclinations. This study contributes to the interdisciplinary dialogue on the peculiar influences on voter behavior and the unanticipated impact of seemingly unrelated societal trends.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between naming trends and political preferences has been a source of both fascination and bewilderment in academic circles. Among the countless curiosities that exist within this realm, perhaps none is more enigmatic than the association between the popularity of the first name "Princess" and the voting behavior for Republican presidential candidates in the state of Alabama. This study endeavors to explore this curious correlation, infusing a dash of whimsy into the typically staid realm of political analysis.
Dad joke alert: What did the princess say about the Alabama voting results? "It's a crownslide victory for the Republicans!"
The allure of investigating such a peculiar correlation lies in its potential to unravel the intricate web of socio-political dynamics that often elude conventional understanding. As such, this study marks an earnest attempt to decipher whether the popularity of the name "Princess" exerts a discernible influence on the voting patterns in the deeply conservative state of Alabama.
Dad joke alert: When asked about the statistical significance of the correlation, the researchers replied, "It's royally significant!"
The empirical foundation of this inquiry rests upon the utilization of comprehensive datasets sourced from reliable repositories, offering an expansive chronological scope from 1976 to 2020. By leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, this analysis underscores the importance of robust data in unraveling the enigma surrounding the "Princess" phenomenon.
The satirical undertone of this investigation belies the serious implications it carries, opening avenues for contemplation on the unintended consequences of cultural cues on political inclinations. Despite the inherent levity of its subject matter, this study assumes a scholarly posture, seeking to contribute meaningfully to the evolving discourse on the complex interplay between nomenclature trends and electoral choices.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Princess" and voting behavior in Alabama for Republican presidential candidates yielded an impressive correlation coefficient of 0.8944124. This strong correlation suggests a substantial association between the popularity of the name "Princess" and support for Republican candidates in the state. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7999736 further underscores the robustness of this relationship.
Dad joke alert: Why did the princess refuse to vote for the Republican candidate? Because she heard they were "reining" in her possibilities!
The statistical significance of the correlation, with a p-value less than 0.01, highlights the reliability and strength of this association. The magnitude of this correlation prompts contemplation on the potential influence of cultural phenomena on voter behavior and the broader implications for political analysis.
Figure 1 illustrates the pronounced correlation between the prevalence of the name "Princess" and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Alabama, further substantiating the quantitative findings of this study.
The surprising strength of this correlation challenges traditional notions of the factors shaping political preferences, inviting further inquiry into the intricate interplay between cultural influences and electoral dynamics. This unexpected connection adds a touch of whimsy to the often rigorous realm of political analysis, underscoring the multifaceted nature of voter behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Princess" and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Alabama. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8944124, coupled with a p-value less than 0.01, underscores the surprising potency of this association. This finding prompts a reevaluation of the conventional understanding of the factors that shape voter behavior, as it unveils the influence of a seemingly whimsical cultural phenomenon on political preferences.

Dad joke alert: Why was the princess so interested in this study? She wanted to make sure her name was fit for a "reigning" party!

The implications of this correlation extend beyond the confines of the electoral domain, delving into the intricate interplay between societal trends and political inclinations. The unexpected nature of this connection injects a dash of levity into the typically austere landscape of political analysis, reminding us of the multifaceted influences that underpin voter behavior.

Further research in this domain may explore the nuances of this correlation across different demographic segments and geographical regions, shedding light on the broader societal implications. However, it can be asserted with confidence that no more research is needed in this area, as we have "crowned" the pinnacle of understanding the connection between the name "Princess" and voting behavior in Alabama.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Princess and the Polls: A Potent Partnership or Purely Peculiar Phenomenon?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Whimsical Social Psychology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Princess and the Polls: A Potent Partnership or Purely Peculiar Phenomenon?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Paradoxical Political Phenomena


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Princess and the Polls: A Potent Partnership or Purely Peculiar Phenomenon? with an abstract of The connection between the popularity of the first name "Princess" and voting behavior in Alabama for Republican presidential candidates has long been a subject of curiosity. In this study, we utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to delve into this whimsical correlation. Our analysis spans the years 1976 to 2020, encompassing a significant period of political shifts and the evolution of baby naming trends.
Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8944124 with a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the prevalence of the name "Princess" and supporting Republican candidates in the state of Alabama. This correlation, while statistically significant, raises the question: is it a case of causation or just a royal coincidence?
Dad joke alert: Why did the princess refuse to vote for the Republican candidate? Because she heard they were "reining" in her possibilities!
The implications of this unlikely link extend beyond mere amusement, shedding light on the intersection of cultural phenomena and political inclinations. This study contributes to the interdisciplinary dialogue on the peculiar influences on voter behavior and the unanticipated impact of seemingly unrelated societal trends.

ChatGPT:

Princess, voting behavior, Alabama, Republican presidential candidates, correlation, US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, baby naming trends, correlation coefficient, causation, cultural phenomena, voter behavior, societal trends

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Princess
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Princess
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Princess

Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Alabama
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Republican Presidential candidate in Alabama
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Alabama

Correlation r = 0.8944124 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7999736 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 80% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Alabama) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Princess) over the 12 years from 1976 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.6E-5. 0.0000863602937831437300000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 0.0086% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 11,579 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.66, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
197619801984198819921996200020042008201220162020
Popularity of the first name Princess (Babies born)70175262279228212279353291249374339
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Alabama (Percentage of votes)42.614948.750160.542559.165147.645450.121856.483862.460760.316960.545862.083162.0316




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([70,175,262,279,228,212,279,353,291,249,374,339,])
array_2 = np.array([42.6149,48.7501,60.5425,59.1651,47.6454,50.1218,56.4838,62.4607,60.3169,60.5458,62.0831,62.0316,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Princess"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Alabama"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 5599 · Black Variable ID: 3596 · Red Variable ID: 26051
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0