about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,573 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Republican Senators in Nevada and the second variable is Gasoline pumped in Saint Helena.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The decrease in Republican votes for Senators in Nevada led to a lessened demand for political hot air. This in turn meant there was more hot air available for other purposes, such as fueling wind turbines. As the production of alternative energy increased, there was a greater supply of energy, causing a decrease in gasoline pumped in Saint Helena. It seems like in this case, as the political climate cooled, so did the cost of fuel.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image showing a serene desert landscape in Nevada with wind turbines in the background generating energy from the abundant hot air. The turbines should be surrounded by the republican senators' campaign signs or related imagery, symbolizing the political implications of the wind energy production. In the foreground, depict a gas station in Saint Helena with a noticeable decrease in the number of cars being refueled, indicating the correlation between the political climate and the drop in fuel costs. The image should convey the impact of alternative energy production on both the environment and the local economy. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for Republican Senators in Nevada and Gasoline pumped in Saint Helena. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy art illustration Woodblock painting A Discovery magazine cover image inspired by bauhaus Psychedelic
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for Republican Senators in Nevada and Gasoline pumped in Saint Helena, in the following situation: The decrease in Republican votes for Senators in Nevada led to a lessened demand for political hot air. This in turn meant there was more hot air available for other purposes, such as fueling wind turbines. As the production of alternative energy increased, there was a greater supply of energy, causing a decrease in gasoline pumped in Saint Helena. It seems like in this case, as the political climate cooled, so did the cost of fuel.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Nevada, fewer votes for Republican Senators led to less political hot air being generated. This resulted in more hot air available for other purposes, like fueling wind turbines. As alternative energy production increased, there was a greater supply of energy, causing a decrease in gasoline being pumped in Saint Helena. The political climate cooling seemed to correlate with a drop in fuel costs.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In Nevada, fewer votes for Republican Senators led to less political hot air being generated. This resulted in more hot air available for other purposes, like fueling wind turbines. As alternative energy production increased, there was a greater supply of energy, causing a decrease in gasoline being pumped in Saint Helena. The political climate cooling seemed to correlate with a drop in fuel costs. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image showing a serene desert landscape in Nevada with wind turbines in the background generating energy from the abundant hot air. The turbines should be surrounded by the republican senators' campaign signs or related imagery, symbolizing the political implications of the wind energy production. In the foreground, depict a gas station in Saint Helena with a noticeable decrease in the number of cars being refueled, indicating the correlation between the political climate and the drop in fuel costs. The image should convey the impact of alternative energy production on both the environment and the local economy.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Republican votes for Senators in Nevada caused Gasoline pumped in Saint Helena to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Republican Representation in Nevada and the Relationship to Rocketing Gasoline in Saint Helena

The Journal of Political Quirkiness

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and Gasoline pumped in Saint Helena. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8017818 and p < 0.05 for 2000 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Republican Representation in Nevada and the Relationship to Rocketing Gasoline in Saint Helena

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this uproarious study, we delved into the unlikely link between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and the amount of gasoline pumped in the far-flung island of Saint Helena. Using uproarious data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to tackle this bizarre connection. To our astonishment, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8017818 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2018. Our findings suggest a surprising relationship between these two seemingly unrelated factors, leaving us pondering the possibility of a Nevada-Saint Helena gas-powered conspiracy. This hilarity-packed research contributes to the comical literature on unexpected statistical associations and underscores the importance of conducting absurdly thorough investigations in the field of data science.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and Gasoline pumped in Saint Helena. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Republican Representation in Nevada and the Relationship to Rocketing Gasoline in Saint Helena

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this uproarious study, we delved into the unlikely link between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and the amount of gasoline pumped in the far-flung island of Saint Helena. Using uproarious data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to tackle this bizarre connection. To our astonishment, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8017818 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2018. Our findings suggest a surprising relationship between these two seemingly unrelated factors, leaving us pondering the possibility of a Nevada-Saint Helena gas-powered conspiracy. This hilarity-packed research contributes to the comical literature on unexpected statistical associations and underscores the importance of conducting absurdly thorough investigations in the field of data science.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of statistical analysis and data science is often filled with unexpected surprises, peculiar connections, and downright bizarre findings. In this rib-tickling study, we sought to explore the enigmatic relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and the astonishing amount of gasoline being pumped in the remote island of Saint Helena. While on the surface, one might be inclined to brush off these variables as completely unrelated, the thrill of scientific exploration led us to uncover this peculiar correlation.

With the help of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we embarked on this comical quest to discern any evidence of a connection between political leanings in the Silver State and the combustion of fossil fuels thousands of miles away. The result of our uproarious endeavor was a correlation coefficient of 0.8017818 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2018, leaving us both astonished and amused.

While the idea of a Nevada-Saint Helena gas-powered conspiracy might sound like the plot of a science fiction comedy, our findings suggest otherwise. This outlandish research contributes to the ever-growing literature on unexpected statistical associations, proving that even the most unlikely pairings can reveal intriguing insights when subjected to rigorous analysis. So, buckle up and prepare for an entertaining journey through the wacky world of statistical relationships and improbable connections.

In the next sections, we will delve into the methodology, data analysis, and results of this hilarity-packed investigation, shedding light on the unexpected correlation between Republican representation in Nevada and the rocketing gasoline consumption in Saint Helena. It's time to inject some laughter into the field of data science and research as we unravel the perplexing bond between politics and petrol, proving that statistical analysis can indeed be an uproarious adventure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and Gasoline pumped in Saint Helena. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Republican Representation in Nevada and the Relationship to Rocketing Gasoline in Saint Helena

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this uproarious study, we delved into the unlikely link between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and the amount of gasoline pumped in the far-flung island of Saint Helena. Using uproarious data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to tackle this bizarre connection. To our astonishment, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8017818 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2018. Our findings suggest a surprising relationship between these two seemingly unrelated factors, leaving us pondering the possibility of a Nevada-Saint Helena gas-powered conspiracy. This hilarity-packed research contributes to the comical literature on unexpected statistical associations and underscores the importance of conducting absurdly thorough investigations in the field of data science.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of statistical analysis and data science is often filled with unexpected surprises, peculiar connections, and downright bizarre findings. In this rib-tickling study, we sought to explore the enigmatic relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and the astonishing amount of gasoline being pumped in the remote island of Saint Helena. While on the surface, one might be inclined to brush off these variables as completely unrelated, the thrill of scientific exploration led us to uncover this peculiar correlation.
With the help of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we embarked on this comical quest to discern any evidence of a connection between political leanings in the Silver State and the combustion of fossil fuels thousands of miles away. The result of our uproarious endeavor was a correlation coefficient of 0.8017818 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2018, leaving us both astonished and amused.
While the idea of a Nevada-Saint Helena gas-powered conspiracy might sound like the plot of a science fiction comedy, our findings suggest otherwise. This outlandish research contributes to the ever-growing literature on unexpected statistical associations, proving that even the most unlikely pairings can reveal intriguing insights when subjected to rigorous analysis. So, buckle up and prepare for an entertaining journey through the wacky world of statistical relationships and improbable connections.
In the next sections, we will delve into the methodology, data analysis, and results of this hilarity-packed investigation, shedding light on the unexpected correlation between Republican representation in Nevada and the rocketing gasoline consumption in Saint Helena. It's time to inject some laughter into the field of data science and research as we unravel the perplexing bond between politics and petrol, proving that statistical analysis can indeed be an uproarious adventure.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

As we dive into the uproarious realm of statistical analysis and unexpected connections, we begin by examining the existing literature on seemingly unrelated variables and their uncanny correlations. Smith et al. (2015) highlighted the surprising link between cheese consumption and the number of bedsheet purchases in New Jersey, while Doe and Jones (2017) comically unraveled the connection between the sales of rubber ducks and the frequency of UFO sightings. These peculiar findings set the stage for our own laugh-out-loud investigation into the relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and the astronomical amounts of gasoline being pumped in the far-flung island of Saint Helena.

Moving beyond the realm of statistical tomfoolery, "Data Science for Business" by Provost and Fawcett (2013) and "Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness" by Thaler and Sunstein (2008) provided invaluable insights into the humorous applications of statistical analysis in unlikely scenarios. These works prompted us to embark on our side-splitting inquiry, exploring the possibility of a connection between political preferences in Nevada and the frenzy of gasoline consumption in Saint Helena.

Venturing into the fictitious world of literature, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams and "Catch-22" by Joseph Heller may not directly address our research question, but their comedic perspectives and outlandish plot twists inspired us to approach our findings with a lighthearted and whimsical outlook. It is in this spirit of hilarity that we present our peculiar findings, inviting readers to join us in a chuckle-inducing journey through the unexpected realm of statistical correlations.

In the realm of social media, a tweet by @DataGeekRiley mused, "Could there be a correlation between political affiliations and the price of gasoline in remote islands? #DataHumor #PoliticalPetrolConspiracy." This jovial query piqued our interest and propelled us to embark on this uproarious investigation, blending statistical analysis with a healthy dose of whimsy and absurdity.

Armed with these light-hearted influences, we proceed to unravel the rib-tickling saga of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and the skyward trajectory of gasoline consumption in Saint Helena. Prepare for a rip-roaring ride through the eccentric world of statistical connections and improbable relationships - and remember to keep a sense of humor handy!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and Gasoline pumped in Saint Helena. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2000 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Republican Representation in Nevada and the Relationship to Rocketing Gasoline in Saint Helena

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this uproarious study, we delved into the unlikely link between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and the amount of gasoline pumped in the far-flung island of Saint Helena. Using uproarious data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to tackle this bizarre connection. To our astonishment, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8017818 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2018. Our findings suggest a surprising relationship between these two seemingly unrelated factors, leaving us pondering the possibility of a Nevada-Saint Helena gas-powered conspiracy. This hilarity-packed research contributes to the comical literature on unexpected statistical associations and underscores the importance of conducting absurdly thorough investigations in the field of data science.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of statistical analysis and data science is often filled with unexpected surprises, peculiar connections, and downright bizarre findings. In this rib-tickling study, we sought to explore the enigmatic relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and the astonishing amount of gasoline being pumped in the remote island of Saint Helena. While on the surface, one might be inclined to brush off these variables as completely unrelated, the thrill of scientific exploration led us to uncover this peculiar correlation.
With the help of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we embarked on this comical quest to discern any evidence of a connection between political leanings in the Silver State and the combustion of fossil fuels thousands of miles away. The result of our uproarious endeavor was a correlation coefficient of 0.8017818 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2018, leaving us both astonished and amused.
While the idea of a Nevada-Saint Helena gas-powered conspiracy might sound like the plot of a science fiction comedy, our findings suggest otherwise. This outlandish research contributes to the ever-growing literature on unexpected statistical associations, proving that even the most unlikely pairings can reveal intriguing insights when subjected to rigorous analysis. So, buckle up and prepare for an entertaining journey through the wacky world of statistical relationships and improbable connections.
In the next sections, we will delve into the methodology, data analysis, and results of this hilarity-packed investigation, shedding light on the unexpected correlation between Republican representation in Nevada and the rocketing gasoline consumption in Saint Helena. It's time to inject some laughter into the field of data science and research as we unravel the perplexing bond between politics and petrol, proving that statistical analysis can indeed be an uproarious adventure.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on this uproarious adventure of uncovering the potential correlation between Republican representation in Nevada and the skyrocketing gasoline consumption in the remote island of Saint Helena, we employed a slew of hilariously convoluted research methods that would make even the most seasoned statistician chuckle.

First and foremost, we gathered data from the esteemed repositories of knowledge, the MIT Election Data and Science Lab and the Harvard Dataverse. These sources provided us with comprehensive and side-splittingly specific information on Republican votes for Senators in Nevada from the years 2000 to 2018. We then harnessed the energy of the internet and combed through the Energy Information Administration's data on gasoline consumption in the peculiar locale of Saint Helena during the same time period.

With data in hand, we engaged in an amusing display of data cleaning and preparation, ensuring that our datasets were as tidy as a meticulously organized clown car. We then utilized a cacophony of statistical tools and techniques, including but not limited to regression analysis, hypothesis testing, and plenty of hair-raisingly complex mathematical maneuvers that would make even an astute data analyst raise an eyebrow in disbelief.

Next, we waded into the auditory and visual spectacle that is correlation analysis. With bated breath and a twinkle in our eye, we calculated the correlation coefficient between Republican votes in Nevada and gasoline consumption in Saint Helena, expecting little more than a chuckle from the data. Lo and behold, we were met with a correlation coefficient of 0.8017818 and a p-value less than 0.05 - an unexpected revelation that left us all guffawing with incredulity.

The striking findings from our uproarious methodology have set the stage for an enlightening and laughter-filled data analysis, as we unravel the mysterious connection between political leanings and petrol consumption. Get ready for a rollicking ride through the next section, where we'll dissect our uproarious results and provide evidence of this unlikely statistical intrigue between the Silver State and the distant island of Saint Helena. This is data science and research at its most riotous, demonstrating the delightfully unpredictable nature of statistical investigations in the most unexpected of domains. Grab your lab coat and your sense of humor - it's time to take a whimsical leap into the world of mirth-filled statistical analysis!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and Gasoline pumped in Saint Helena. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2000 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.8017818, r-squared of 0.6428541, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Republican Representation in Nevada and the Relationship to Rocketing Gasoline in Saint Helena

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this uproarious study, we delved into the unlikely link between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and the amount of gasoline pumped in the far-flung island of Saint Helena. Using uproarious data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to tackle this bizarre connection. To our astonishment, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8017818 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2018. Our findings suggest a surprising relationship between these two seemingly unrelated factors, leaving us pondering the possibility of a Nevada-Saint Helena gas-powered conspiracy. This hilarity-packed research contributes to the comical literature on unexpected statistical associations and underscores the importance of conducting absurdly thorough investigations in the field of data science.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of statistical analysis and data science is often filled with unexpected surprises, peculiar connections, and downright bizarre findings. In this rib-tickling study, we sought to explore the enigmatic relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and the astonishing amount of gasoline being pumped in the remote island of Saint Helena. While on the surface, one might be inclined to brush off these variables as completely unrelated, the thrill of scientific exploration led us to uncover this peculiar correlation.
With the help of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we embarked on this comical quest to discern any evidence of a connection between political leanings in the Silver State and the combustion of fossil fuels thousands of miles away. The result of our uproarious endeavor was a correlation coefficient of 0.8017818 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2018, leaving us both astonished and amused.
While the idea of a Nevada-Saint Helena gas-powered conspiracy might sound like the plot of a science fiction comedy, our findings suggest otherwise. This outlandish research contributes to the ever-growing literature on unexpected statistical associations, proving that even the most unlikely pairings can reveal intriguing insights when subjected to rigorous analysis. So, buckle up and prepare for an entertaining journey through the wacky world of statistical relationships and improbable connections.
In the next sections, we will delve into the methodology, data analysis, and results of this hilarity-packed investigation, shedding light on the unexpected correlation between Republican representation in Nevada and the rocketing gasoline consumption in Saint Helena. It's time to inject some laughter into the field of data science and research as we unravel the perplexing bond between politics and petrol, proving that statistical analysis can indeed be an uproarious adventure.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The findings of this riotous investigation unveiled an unexpected relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and the amount of gasoline pumped in the distant island of Saint Helena. Our data analysis, brimming with laughter and statistical rigor, revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8017818 and an r-squared value of 0.6428541 for the period spanning from 2000 to 2018. With a p-value less than 0.05, our results had us reeling with astonishment and amusement.

A noteworthy figure (Fig. 1) illustrates the whimsical correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, showcasing a strong and unexpected association that left our research team both astounded and thoroughly entertained. The scatterplot, not lacking in comedic appeal, demonstrates the uncanny link between Republican representation in Nevada and the soaring gasoline consumption in Saint Helena, sparking both curiosity and laughter among our research team.

These uproarious findings contribute to the ever-growing literature on improbable statistical associations, proving that even the most unlikely pairings can hold captivating insights when subjected to meticulous analysis. Our comical voyage through the world of data science and research has shed lighthearted on the perplexing bond between politics and petrol, reminding us that statistical analysis can indeed be an uproarious adventure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and Gasoline pumped in Saint Helena. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Republican Representation in Nevada and the Relationship to Rocketing Gasoline in Saint Helena

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this uproarious study, we delved into the unlikely link between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and the amount of gasoline pumped in the far-flung island of Saint Helena. Using uproarious data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to tackle this bizarre connection. To our astonishment, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8017818 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2018. Our findings suggest a surprising relationship between these two seemingly unrelated factors, leaving us pondering the possibility of a Nevada-Saint Helena gas-powered conspiracy. This hilarity-packed research contributes to the comical literature on unexpected statistical associations and underscores the importance of conducting absurdly thorough investigations in the field of data science.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
As we dive into the uproarious realm of statistical analysis and unexpected connections, we begin by examining the existing literature on seemingly unrelated variables and their uncanny correlations. Smith et al. (2015) highlighted the surprising link between cheese consumption and the number of bedsheet purchases in New Jersey, while Doe and Jones (2017) comically unraveled the connection between the sales of rubber ducks and the frequency of UFO sightings. These peculiar findings set the stage for our own laugh-out-loud investigation into the relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and the astronomical amounts of gasoline being pumped in the far-flung island of Saint Helena.
Moving beyond the realm of statistical tomfoolery, "Data Science for Business" by Provost and Fawcett (2013) and "Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness" by Thaler and Sunstein (2008) provided invaluable insights into the humorous applications of statistical analysis in unlikely scenarios. These works prompted us to embark on our side-splitting inquiry, exploring the possibility of a connection between political preferences in Nevada and the frenzy of gasoline consumption in Saint Helena.
Venturing into the fictitious world of literature, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams and "Catch-22" by Joseph Heller may not directly address our research question, but their comedic perspectives and outlandish plot twists inspired us to approach our findings with a lighthearted and whimsical outlook. It is in this spirit of hilarity that we present our peculiar findings, inviting readers to join us in a chuckle-inducing journey through the unexpected realm of statistical correlations.
In the realm of social media, a tweet by @DataGeekRiley mused, "Could there be a correlation between political affiliations and the price of gasoline in remote islands? #DataHumor #PoliticalPetrolConspiracy." This jovial query piqued our interest and propelled us to embark on this uproarious investigation, blending statistical analysis with a healthy dose of whimsy and absurdity.
Armed with these light-hearted influences, we proceed to unravel the rib-tickling saga of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and the skyward trajectory of gasoline consumption in Saint Helena. Prepare for a rip-roaring ride through the eccentric world of statistical connections and improbable relationships - and remember to keep a sense of humor handy!

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of this riotous investigation unveiled an unexpected relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and the amount of gasoline pumped in the distant island of Saint Helena. Our data analysis, brimming with laughter and statistical rigor, revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8017818 and an r-squared value of 0.6428541 for the period spanning from 2000 to 2018. With a p-value less than 0.05, our results had us reeling with astonishment and amusement.
A noteworthy figure (Fig. 1) illustrates the whimsical correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, showcasing a strong and unexpected association that left our research team both astounded and thoroughly entertained. The scatterplot, not lacking in comedic appeal, demonstrates the uncanny link between Republican representation in Nevada and the soaring gasoline consumption in Saint Helena, sparking both curiosity and laughter among our research team.
These uproarious findings contribute to the ever-growing literature on improbable statistical associations, proving that even the most unlikely pairings can hold captivating insights when subjected to meticulous analysis. Our comical voyage through the world of data science and research has shed lighthearted on the perplexing bond between politics and petrol, reminding us that statistical analysis can indeed be an uproarious adventure.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our uproarious findings have peeled back the curtain on a connection that is more than just a statistical belly-laugh. The correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and the amount of gasoline pumped in Saint Helena is anything but gas-light! Our results shatter the all-too-common belief that politics and petrol are as unrelated as a clownfish and a bicycle.

Our research, emboldened by the comical literature on unexpected correlations, provides hard evidence to support the uproarious hypotheses put forth by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2017). While their findings may have seemed whimsical at first glance, our own study has turned their jests into genuine scientific considerations. The cheese-and-bedsheet and rubber-duck-and-UFO sightings connections may have brought fits of laughter at academic conferences, but our Nevada-Saint Helena gas-powered conspiracy stands as a rib-tickling testament to the unexpected mysteries of statistical analysis.

Notably, our results boast a correlation coefficient of 0.8017818, practically waltzing into the realm of statistical significance with a p-value less than 0.05. This leaves us shaking our heads in amusement and admiration at the audacity of statistical whimsy. Our scatterplot, adored by both data scientists and stand-up comedians, paints a picture of an unquestionably buoyant relationship between Nevada Republicans and Saint Helena gasoline, setting the stage for comically captivating debates in both the academic and the joke-writing communities.

While our findings may seem outlandish, they reinforce the notion that statistical analysis is more than squiggly lines and regression equations – it is a side-splitting adventure that unearths the most improbable connections. As we step back from our laughter-inducing investigation, we're left with a deepened appreciation for the comical potential of data science and a renewed sense of vigor for unearthing the next uproarious statistical spectacle. So, as we part ways for now, remember to keep a sense of humor handy on your own statistical escapades – who knows what hilariously quirky uncoverings may lie ahead!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and Gasoline pumped in Saint Helena. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Republican Representation in Nevada and the Relationship to Rocketing Gasoline in Saint Helena

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this uproarious study, we delved into the unlikely link between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and the amount of gasoline pumped in the far-flung island of Saint Helena. Using uproarious data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to tackle this bizarre connection. To our astonishment, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8017818 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2018. Our findings suggest a surprising relationship between these two seemingly unrelated factors, leaving us pondering the possibility of a Nevada-Saint Helena gas-powered conspiracy. This hilarity-packed research contributes to the comical literature on unexpected statistical associations and underscores the importance of conducting absurdly thorough investigations in the field of data science.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of statistical analysis and data science is often filled with unexpected surprises, peculiar connections, and downright bizarre findings. In this rib-tickling study, we sought to explore the enigmatic relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and the astonishing amount of gasoline being pumped in the remote island of Saint Helena. While on the surface, one might be inclined to brush off these variables as completely unrelated, the thrill of scientific exploration led us to uncover this peculiar correlation.
With the help of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we embarked on this comical quest to discern any evidence of a connection between political leanings in the Silver State and the combustion of fossil fuels thousands of miles away. The result of our uproarious endeavor was a correlation coefficient of 0.8017818 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2018, leaving us both astonished and amused.
While the idea of a Nevada-Saint Helena gas-powered conspiracy might sound like the plot of a science fiction comedy, our findings suggest otherwise. This outlandish research contributes to the ever-growing literature on unexpected statistical associations, proving that even the most unlikely pairings can reveal intriguing insights when subjected to rigorous analysis. So, buckle up and prepare for an entertaining journey through the wacky world of statistical relationships and improbable connections.
In the next sections, we will delve into the methodology, data analysis, and results of this hilarity-packed investigation, shedding light on the unexpected correlation between Republican representation in Nevada and the rocketing gasoline consumption in Saint Helena. It's time to inject some laughter into the field of data science and research as we unravel the perplexing bond between politics and petrol, proving that statistical analysis can indeed be an uproarious adventure.

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of this riotous investigation unveiled an unexpected relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and the amount of gasoline pumped in the distant island of Saint Helena. Our data analysis, brimming with laughter and statistical rigor, revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8017818 and an r-squared value of 0.6428541 for the period spanning from 2000 to 2018. With a p-value less than 0.05, our results had us reeling with astonishment and amusement.
A noteworthy figure (Fig. 1) illustrates the whimsical correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, showcasing a strong and unexpected association that left our research team both astounded and thoroughly entertained. The scatterplot, not lacking in comedic appeal, demonstrates the uncanny link between Republican representation in Nevada and the soaring gasoline consumption in Saint Helena, sparking both curiosity and laughter among our research team.
These uproarious findings contribute to the ever-growing literature on improbable statistical associations, proving that even the most unlikely pairings can hold captivating insights when subjected to meticulous analysis. Our comical voyage through the world of data science and research has shed lighthearted on the perplexing bond between politics and petrol, reminding us that statistical analysis can indeed be an uproarious adventure.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our uproarious expedition into the world of statistical analysis has unveiled a comically unexpected relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and the amount of gasoline pumped in Saint Helena. The positively uproarious correlation coefficient of 0.8017818 and the r-squared value of 0.6428541 for the period spanning from 2000 to 2018 has left us chuckling with disbelief and amusement. Our findings, encapsulated in the hilarious scatterplot (Fig. 1), underscore the unlikely but uproariously undeniable connection between these seemingly unrelated variables.

As we bid adieu to this wildly amusing research, we assert with utmost confidence that no further investigation is needed in this belly-laugh-inducing area. The enigmatic bond between politics and petrol in Nevada and Saint Helena has been thoroughly explored, analyzed, and quite frankly, thoroughly entertained. Our uproarious study serves as a reminder that even the most far-fetched statistical pairings can yield rib-tickling insights when subjected to rigorous analysis. So, let's fuel our future research endeavors with the laughter and surprise that awaits us in the wacky world of statistical analysis!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Republican Representation in Nevada and the Relationship to Rocketing Gasoline in Saint Helena. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Political Quirkiness


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Republican Representation in Nevada and the Relationship to Rocketing Gasoline in Saint Helena. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Quirky Sociopolitical Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Republican Representation in Nevada and the Relationship to Rocketing Gasoline in Saint Helena with an abstract of In this uproarious study, we delved into the unlikely link between Republican votes for Senators in Nevada and the amount of gasoline pumped in the far-flung island of Saint Helena. Using uproarious data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to tackle this bizarre connection. To our astonishment, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8017818 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2018. Our findings suggest a surprising relationship between these two seemingly unrelated factors, leaving us pondering the possibility of a Nevada-Saint Helena gas-powered conspiracy. This hilarity-packed research contributes to the comical literature on unexpected statistical associations and underscores the importance of conducting absurdly thorough investigations in the field of data science.

ChatGPT:

"Nevada Senate Republican votes," "gasoline consumption Saint Helena," "MIT Election Data and Science Lab," "Harvard Dataverse," "Energy Information Administration," "correlation coefficient political voting gasoline consumption," "relationship between voting and gas consumption," "unusual statistical associations," "data science research," "Nevada gas-powered conspiracy," "absurd investigations in data science"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Republican Senators in Nevada
Detailed data title: Percentage of votes cast for Federal Republican Senate candidates in Nevada
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Republican Senators in Nevada

Gasoline pumped in Saint Helena
Detailed data title: Volume of gasoline pumped consumed in Saint Helena in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Gasoline pumped in Saint Helena

Correlation r = 0.8017818 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6428541 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 64.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Gasoline pumped in Saint Helena) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Republican Senators in Nevada) over the 7 years from 2000 through 2018.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0301. 0.0300999320972817930000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 3.01% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 33 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 6 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 6 because we have two variables measured over a period of 7 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.12, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2000200420062010201220162018
Votes for Republican Senators in Nevada (Percentage of votes)55.043335.137855.358144.546645.866344.670445.385
Gasoline pumped in Saint Helena (Million Barrels/Day)0.0233060.01235220.017060.017060.01514890.0163580.0163589




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([55.0433,35.1378,55.3581,44.5466,45.8663,44.6704,45.385,])
array_2 = np.array([0.023306,0.0123522,0.01706,0.01706,0.0151489,0.016358,0.0163589,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Republican Senators in Nevada"
array_2_name = "Gasoline pumped in Saint Helena"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 5573 · Black Variable ID: 26424 · Red Variable ID: 24851
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0