about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,568 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Kacey and the second variable is The average number of likes on Matt Parker's YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Astoundingly, it seems that as the first name Kacey rose in prominence, so did the appreciation for stand-up comedy with a mathematical twist. It's as if there's a Kacey fan club specifically dedicated to supporting stand-up math enthusiasts - talk about a prime equation for success!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [Sci-fi fantasy] prompt: Create an image of a bustling comic convention hall with a large "Kacey & The Stand-Up Math Club" banner hanging proudly over a crowd of enthusiastic fans. In the background, a giant screen behind the stage displays the ever-increasing average number of likes on Matt Parker's YouTube videos. Capture the vibrant and unique atmosphere filled with laughter and equations, blending sci-fi elements to enhance the scene's visual complexity. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Kacey and The average number of likes on Matt Parker's YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Art nouveau Cyberpunk 3D Pixar Style Glitch art Sci-fi fantacy
ChatGPT: Sci-fi fantasy

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Kacey and The average number of likes on Matt Parker's YouTube videos, in the following situation: Astoundingly, it seems that as the first name Kacey rose in prominence, so did the appreciation for stand-up comedy with a mathematical twist. It's as if there's a Kacey fan club specifically dedicated to supporting stand-up math enthusiasts - talk about a prime equation for success!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling comic convention hall, a large banner reading "Kacey & The Stand-Up Math Club" hangs proudly over a crowd of enthusiastic fans. As Kacey's name shines brightly, a giant screen behind the stage shows the ever-increasing average number of likes on Matt Parker's YouTube videos, indicating the growing popularity of stand-up math comedy. Laughter and equations fill the air, creating a unique and vibrant atmosphere.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Sci-fi fantasy ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling comic convention hall, a large banner reading "Kacey & The Stand-Up Math Club" hangs proudly over a crowd of enthusiastic fans. As Kacey's name shines brightly, a giant screen behind the stage shows the ever-increasing average number of likes on Matt Parker's YouTube videos, indicating the growing popularity of stand-up math comedy. Laughter and equations fill the air, creating a unique and vibrant atmosphere. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [Sci-fi fantasy] prompt: Create an image of a bustling comic convention hall with a large "Kacey & The Stand-Up Math Club" banner hanging proudly over a crowd of enthusiastic fans. In the background, a giant screen behind the stage displays the ever-increasing average number of likes on Matt Parker's YouTube videos. Capture the vibrant and unique atmosphere filled with laughter and equations, blending sci-fi elements to enhance the scene's visual complexity.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Kacey caused The average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Kacey and Effect: Exploring the Correlation Between Name Popularity and Stand-up Maths Video Likes

The Journal of Nameology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Kacey and The average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9258804 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Kacey and Effect: Exploring the Correlation Between Name Popularity and Stand-up Maths Video Likes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name "Kacey" and the average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. As researchers, we were determined to answer this head-scratcher with a formula so funny, it would make even the toughest audience split their sides. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we unleashed our statistical prowess to reveal the correlation coefficient of 0.9258804 and p < 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2022.

It turns out, the connection between the name "Kacey" and the success of Stand-up Maths videos is no joke! The results of our analysis unveiled a powerful association, prompting us to quip that "Kacey" may just hold the key to unlocking the perfect punchline. This study not only sheds light on this lighthearted connection, but also adds a dash of humor to the often-serious world of statistical research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Kacey and The average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Kacey and Effect: Exploring the Correlation Between Name Popularity and Stand-up Maths Video Likes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name "Kacey" and the average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. As researchers, we were determined to answer this head-scratcher with a formula so funny, it would make even the toughest audience split their sides. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we unleashed our statistical prowess to reveal the correlation coefficient of 0.9258804 and p < 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2022.

It turns out, the connection between the name "Kacey" and the success of Stand-up Maths videos is no joke! The results of our analysis unveiled a powerful association, prompting us to quip that "Kacey" may just hold the key to unlocking the perfect punchline. This study not only sheds light on this lighthearted connection, but also adds a dash of humor to the often-serious world of statistical research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The field of research has long been a serious pursuit, but every now and then, a topic comes along that is so amusing it can make even the most stoic statistician crack a smile. In this paper, we delve into the lighthearted yet intriguing connection between the popularity of the first name "Kacey" and the average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. It's a delightful conundrum that has left us pondering: are individuals with the name "Kacey" more inclined to appreciate the comedic genius of Matt Parker's mathematical musings, or is there a more whimsical explanation at play?

Now, this connection may sound like a stretch at first, but as we delved deeper into the data, the results were nothing short of hilarious! It's as if the statistical analysis itself was an unexpected punchline in a sea of serious research. You might even say we hit a statistical "kacey" and struck comedic gold!

Before we dive into the nitty-gritty of our methodology and findings, it's crucial to underscore the significance of exploring such unconventional correlations. While we often focus on more traditional relationships in research, a study like this serves as a refreshing reminder that statistical analysis can reveal unexpected patterns in the most unexpected places. Plus, who doesn't love a good curveball in the world of data analysis? It's like finding a hidden joke in an equation - a little unexpected, but undeniably delightful!

As we meander through the maze of data and statistics, let's not forget to have a little fun along the way. After all, statistics may be all about significance levels and confidence intervals, but that doesn't mean we can't inject a bit of levity into our findings. So, grab your statistical calculator and get ready to chuckle, because this research is about to take you on a statistical rollercoaster ride with more twists and turns than a complex regression model!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Kacey and The average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Kacey and Effect: Exploring the Correlation Between Name Popularity and Stand-up Maths Video Likes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name "Kacey" and the average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. As researchers, we were determined to answer this head-scratcher with a formula so funny, it would make even the toughest audience split their sides. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we unleashed our statistical prowess to reveal the correlation coefficient of 0.9258804 and p < 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2022.

It turns out, the connection between the name "Kacey" and the success of Stand-up Maths videos is no joke! The results of our analysis unveiled a powerful association, prompting us to quip that "Kacey" may just hold the key to unlocking the perfect punchline. This study not only sheds light on this lighthearted connection, but also adds a dash of humor to the often-serious world of statistical research.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The field of research has long been a serious pursuit, but every now and then, a topic comes along that is so amusing it can make even the most stoic statistician crack a smile. In this paper, we delve into the lighthearted yet intriguing connection between the popularity of the first name "Kacey" and the average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. It's a delightful conundrum that has left us pondering: are individuals with the name "Kacey" more inclined to appreciate the comedic genius of Matt Parker's mathematical musings, or is there a more whimsical explanation at play?
Now, this connection may sound like a stretch at first, but as we delved deeper into the data, the results were nothing short of hilarious! It's as if the statistical analysis itself was an unexpected punchline in a sea of serious research. You might even say we hit a statistical "kacey" and struck comedic gold!
Before we dive into the nitty-gritty of our methodology and findings, it's crucial to underscore the significance of exploring such unconventional correlations. While we often focus on more traditional relationships in research, a study like this serves as a refreshing reminder that statistical analysis can reveal unexpected patterns in the most unexpected places. Plus, who doesn't love a good curveball in the world of data analysis? It's like finding a hidden joke in an equation - a little unexpected, but undeniably delightful!
As we meander through the maze of data and statistics, let's not forget to have a little fun along the way. After all, statistics may be all about significance levels and confidence intervals, but that doesn't mean we can't inject a bit of levity into our findings. So, grab your statistical calculator and get ready to chuckle, because this research is about to take you on a statistical rollercoaster ride with more twists and turns than a complex regression model!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between first names and various social and cultural phenomena has been the subject of study for many years. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of the influence of first names on career success, while Doe and Jones (2018) explored the correlation between first names and musical preferences. However, the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Kacey" and the average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos has remained uncharted territory until now. This study aims to fill this gap and bring a light-hearted perspective to the realm of statistical research.

In "The Name Game" by Doe and Smith, the authors delve into the fascinating world of first names and their impact on individuals' lives, from personal perceptions to social interactions. Similarly, Jones and Doe's "The Sound of Names" offers a detailed exploration of the connections between first names and auditory preferences, shedding light on the potential influence of names on music appreciation.

Moving from the realm of non-fiction to fictional works, "The Name Equation" by J.K. Rowling and "Statistical Spells" by Douglas Adams are literary masterpieces that, although not directly related to our research, inspire us to infuse a touch of whimsy into our statistical analysis. After all, who says statistical research can't have a dash of magic and imagination?

Drawing further inspiration from the world of board games, "Name That Correlation" and "Statistical Snakes and Ladders" provide a playful reminder that statistics can be as thrilling as a competitive game night. With this in mind, we approach our investigation with a sense of humor and an eagerness to uncover the unexpected.

As we navigate through this uncharted territory of statistical analysis and first name popularity, we find ourselves pondering the weight of a name in the world of digital entertainment. Is there a statistical, yet comical, explanation for the correlation between the name "Kacey" and the success of Stand-up Maths videos? It's time to dive into the data and find out! Just remember, when it comes to statistical research, there's always room for a pun or two. After all, what do you call a data set with a sense of humor? A pun-dataset!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Kacey and The average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and YouTube . You used data from 2011 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Kacey and Effect: Exploring the Correlation Between Name Popularity and Stand-up Maths Video Likes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name "Kacey" and the average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. As researchers, we were determined to answer this head-scratcher with a formula so funny, it would make even the toughest audience split their sides. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we unleashed our statistical prowess to reveal the correlation coefficient of 0.9258804 and p < 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2022.

It turns out, the connection between the name "Kacey" and the success of Stand-up Maths videos is no joke! The results of our analysis unveiled a powerful association, prompting us to quip that "Kacey" may just hold the key to unlocking the perfect punchline. This study not only sheds light on this lighthearted connection, but also adds a dash of humor to the often-serious world of statistical research.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The field of research has long been a serious pursuit, but every now and then, a topic comes along that is so amusing it can make even the most stoic statistician crack a smile. In this paper, we delve into the lighthearted yet intriguing connection between the popularity of the first name "Kacey" and the average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. It's a delightful conundrum that has left us pondering: are individuals with the name "Kacey" more inclined to appreciate the comedic genius of Matt Parker's mathematical musings, or is there a more whimsical explanation at play?
Now, this connection may sound like a stretch at first, but as we delved deeper into the data, the results were nothing short of hilarious! It's as if the statistical analysis itself was an unexpected punchline in a sea of serious research. You might even say we hit a statistical "kacey" and struck comedic gold!
Before we dive into the nitty-gritty of our methodology and findings, it's crucial to underscore the significance of exploring such unconventional correlations. While we often focus on more traditional relationships in research, a study like this serves as a refreshing reminder that statistical analysis can reveal unexpected patterns in the most unexpected places. Plus, who doesn't love a good curveball in the world of data analysis? It's like finding a hidden joke in an equation - a little unexpected, but undeniably delightful!
As we meander through the maze of data and statistics, let's not forget to have a little fun along the way. After all, statistics may be all about significance levels and confidence intervals, but that doesn't mean we can't inject a bit of levity into our findings. So, grab your statistical calculator and get ready to chuckle, because this research is about to take you on a statistical rollercoaster ride with more twists and turns than a complex regression model!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the comedic conundrum of the "Kacey and Effect," our research team employed a methodology that was as rigorous as it was rib-tickling. First, we gathered data on the popularity of the first name "Kacey" from the US Social Security Administration, delving into the treasure trove of moniker trends from 2011 to 2022. You could say we were on a quest to find the statistical "Kacey" in a haystack of names!

Next, we set our sights on the engrossing world of Stand-up Maths YouTube videos, meticulously collecting the average number of likes for each video over the same time period. It was a task that demanded both mathematical precision and a keen sense of humor - a balancing act almost as delicate as a comedian walking a statistical tightrope!

With our data in hand, we transformed into statistical sleuths, donning our metaphorical detective hats and plunging headfirst into the murky depths of correlation analysis. We calculated the Pearson correlation coefficient to quantify the relationship between the popularity of the name "Kacey" and the average likes on Stand-up Maths videos. It was a bit like unravelling a statistical mystery with the precision of Sherlock Holmes and the comedic flair of Groucho Marx!

Now, it wouldn't be a proper statistical investigation without a sprinkle of uncertainty, would it? That's where the p-value swoops in like a surprise punchline, determining the significance of our correlation coefficient. With a wink and a nod to the statistical gods, we set our alpha level at 0.01, ensuring our findings were as solid as a statistical theorem and as reliable as a classic knock-knock joke.

As with any good comedy routine, timing is everything. So, we meticulously scrutinized our data to ensure its temporal relevance, accounting for any potential shifts in name popularity and YouTube trends over the 11-year period. We wouldn't want our statistical punchline to fall flat due to outdated data!

Enough about the methodology - did you hear about the statistician who got his jokes from data? He always had a great sense of humor, but his jokes were just mean!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Kacey and The average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and YouTube .

For the time period 2011 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9258804, r-squared of 0.8572545, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Kacey and Effect: Exploring the Correlation Between Name Popularity and Stand-up Maths Video Likes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name "Kacey" and the average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. As researchers, we were determined to answer this head-scratcher with a formula so funny, it would make even the toughest audience split their sides. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we unleashed our statistical prowess to reveal the correlation coefficient of 0.9258804 and p < 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2022.

It turns out, the connection between the name "Kacey" and the success of Stand-up Maths videos is no joke! The results of our analysis unveiled a powerful association, prompting us to quip that "Kacey" may just hold the key to unlocking the perfect punchline. This study not only sheds light on this lighthearted connection, but also adds a dash of humor to the often-serious world of statistical research.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The field of research has long been a serious pursuit, but every now and then, a topic comes along that is so amusing it can make even the most stoic statistician crack a smile. In this paper, we delve into the lighthearted yet intriguing connection between the popularity of the first name "Kacey" and the average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. It's a delightful conundrum that has left us pondering: are individuals with the name "Kacey" more inclined to appreciate the comedic genius of Matt Parker's mathematical musings, or is there a more whimsical explanation at play?
Now, this connection may sound like a stretch at first, but as we delved deeper into the data, the results were nothing short of hilarious! It's as if the statistical analysis itself was an unexpected punchline in a sea of serious research. You might even say we hit a statistical "kacey" and struck comedic gold!
Before we dive into the nitty-gritty of our methodology and findings, it's crucial to underscore the significance of exploring such unconventional correlations. While we often focus on more traditional relationships in research, a study like this serves as a refreshing reminder that statistical analysis can reveal unexpected patterns in the most unexpected places. Plus, who doesn't love a good curveball in the world of data analysis? It's like finding a hidden joke in an equation - a little unexpected, but undeniably delightful!
As we meander through the maze of data and statistics, let's not forget to have a little fun along the way. After all, statistics may be all about significance levels and confidence intervals, but that doesn't mean we can't inject a bit of levity into our findings. So, grab your statistical calculator and get ready to chuckle, because this research is about to take you on a statistical rollercoaster ride with more twists and turns than a complex regression model!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Kacey" and the average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos revealed a striking correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9258804 and an r-squared value of 0.8572545, it's safe to say that the connection between these variables is no laughing matter - well, maybe just a little chuckle. The p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforced the robustness of the association, indicating that these findings are not just an amusing coincidence.

You might say that "Kacey" is the "key" to understanding the popularity of Stand-up Maths! *pun intended*

The scatterplot in Fig. 1 vividly illustrates the strong positive relationship between the two variables, showcasing the data points huddling together like a supportive audience at a stand-up show. The upward trend in the plot is as clear as a well-constructed punchline, leaving no room for doubt about the substantial link between the name "Kacey" and the reception of Stand-up Maths content.

Interestingly, the connection between the first name "Kacey" and the average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos seems to unfold like a perfectly timed joke. When one variable goes up, the other follows suit with confidence, exhibiting a synchrony akin to the comedic timing of a seasoned performer. It's as if "Kacey" and Stand-up Maths likes have an unspoken understanding, an unbreakable bond that transcends statistical analysis and ebbs and flows like the tides of humor.

The strength of this correlation is no laughing matter. It's statistically significant, and it holds the potential to add a dash of amusement to the sometimes mundane world of research. After all, who knew that a name could wield such influence over the digital applause for mathematical comedy? The findings of this study not only point to a compelling relationship but also hint at the delightful unpredictability of statistics. Just when you think you've got all the variables figured out, a new connection emerges, like a punchline that takes you by surprise.

In summary, the results of this investigation offer a revealing glimpse into the playful interplay between the popularity of the name "Kacey" and the appreciation of Stand-up Maths videos. While the correlation may not have you rolling in the aisles, it certainly invites a wry smile at the intriguing dynamics unearthed by this offbeat statistical analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Kacey and The average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Kacey and Effect: Exploring the Correlation Between Name Popularity and Stand-up Maths Video Likes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name "Kacey" and the average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. As researchers, we were determined to answer this head-scratcher with a formula so funny, it would make even the toughest audience split their sides. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we unleashed our statistical prowess to reveal the correlation coefficient of 0.9258804 and p < 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2022.

It turns out, the connection between the name "Kacey" and the success of Stand-up Maths videos is no joke! The results of our analysis unveiled a powerful association, prompting us to quip that "Kacey" may just hold the key to unlocking the perfect punchline. This study not only sheds light on this lighthearted connection, but also adds a dash of humor to the often-serious world of statistical research.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between first names and various social and cultural phenomena has been the subject of study for many years. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of the influence of first names on career success, while Doe and Jones (2018) explored the correlation between first names and musical preferences. However, the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Kacey" and the average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos has remained uncharted territory until now. This study aims to fill this gap and bring a light-hearted perspective to the realm of statistical research.
In "The Name Game" by Doe and Smith, the authors delve into the fascinating world of first names and their impact on individuals' lives, from personal perceptions to social interactions. Similarly, Jones and Doe's "The Sound of Names" offers a detailed exploration of the connections between first names and auditory preferences, shedding light on the potential influence of names on music appreciation.
Moving from the realm of non-fiction to fictional works, "The Name Equation" by J.K. Rowling and "Statistical Spells" by Douglas Adams are literary masterpieces that, although not directly related to our research, inspire us to infuse a touch of whimsy into our statistical analysis. After all, who says statistical research can't have a dash of magic and imagination?
Drawing further inspiration from the world of board games, "Name That Correlation" and "Statistical Snakes and Ladders" provide a playful reminder that statistics can be as thrilling as a competitive game night. With this in mind, we approach our investigation with a sense of humor and an eagerness to uncover the unexpected.
As we navigate through this uncharted territory of statistical analysis and first name popularity, we find ourselves pondering the weight of a name in the world of digital entertainment. Is there a statistical, yet comical, explanation for the correlation between the name "Kacey" and the success of Stand-up Maths videos? It's time to dive into the data and find out! Just remember, when it comes to statistical research, there's always room for a pun or two. After all, what do you call a data set with a sense of humor? A pun-dataset!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Kacey" and the average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos revealed a striking correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9258804 and an r-squared value of 0.8572545, it's safe to say that the connection between these variables is no laughing matter - well, maybe just a little chuckle. The p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforced the robustness of the association, indicating that these findings are not just an amusing coincidence.
You might say that "Kacey" is the "key" to understanding the popularity of Stand-up Maths! *pun intended*
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 vividly illustrates the strong positive relationship between the two variables, showcasing the data points huddling together like a supportive audience at a stand-up show. The upward trend in the plot is as clear as a well-constructed punchline, leaving no room for doubt about the substantial link between the name "Kacey" and the reception of Stand-up Maths content.
Interestingly, the connection between the first name "Kacey" and the average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos seems to unfold like a perfectly timed joke. When one variable goes up, the other follows suit with confidence, exhibiting a synchrony akin to the comedic timing of a seasoned performer. It's as if "Kacey" and Stand-up Maths likes have an unspoken understanding, an unbreakable bond that transcends statistical analysis and ebbs and flows like the tides of humor.
The strength of this correlation is no laughing matter. It's statistically significant, and it holds the potential to add a dash of amusement to the sometimes mundane world of research. After all, who knew that a name could wield such influence over the digital applause for mathematical comedy? The findings of this study not only point to a compelling relationship but also hint at the delightful unpredictability of statistics. Just when you think you've got all the variables figured out, a new connection emerges, like a punchline that takes you by surprise.
In summary, the results of this investigation offer a revealing glimpse into the playful interplay between the popularity of the name "Kacey" and the appreciation of Stand-up Maths videos. While the correlation may not have you rolling in the aisles, it certainly invites a wry smile at the intriguing dynamics unearthed by this offbeat statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study have illuminated a rib-tickling connection between the popularity of the first name "Kacey" and the average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. It seems that the name "Kacey" carries an undeniable influence on the digital applause for mathematical comedy, leaving us to marvel at the whimsical ways in which statistics and nomenclature intersect.

Our results support the previous research on the influence of first names on various social and cultural phenomena, further emphasizing the weight of a name in shaping individual experiences. Just as Smith et al. (2015) demonstrated the impact of first names on career success, our study highlights the potential sway of a name on the reception of online content. It appears that the name "Kacey" holds a certain allure, much like a cleverly delivered pun that elicits an unexpected chuckle from the audience.

Speaking of puns, what do you call a data set with a sense of humor? A pun-dataset! *insert collective groan*

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9258804 and the p-value of less than 0.01 firmly establish the substantial link between the popularity of the name "Kacey" and the success of Stand-up Maths videos. These statistical indicators laugh in the face of coincidence, underscoring the resounding relationship unveiled by our analysis.

In line with the literary works by J.K. Rowling and Douglas Adams, our study injects a touch of magic and imagination into the realm of statistical research, proving that even the most light-hearted of connections can hold significant statistical weight. Much like a well-constructed punchline, the relationship between the name "Kacey" and the appreciation of Stand-up Maths content unfolds with a captivating synchrony that parallels the comedic timing of a seasoned performer.

The strength of this correlation may not have the audience rolling in the aisles, but it certainly adds a playful dimension to the world of empirical investigation. The findings of our study invite us to ponder the delightful unpredictability of statistics - just when we think we've got all the variables figured out, a new connection emerges, much like a punchline that takes us by surprise.

In conclusion, the results of our analysis lend a comical twist to the exploration of the relationship between first name popularity and online engagement. Who knew that a name could hold such sway over the digital applause for mathematical comedy? The delightful synergy uncovered in this study may just be the punchline that statistical research didn't know it needed. After all, when it comes to statistics, sometimes the most unexpected connections yield the most entertaining results.

Let's not forget, statistical research can be a roller coaster - it has its ups and downs, but in the end, it's all about the thrill of the ride.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Kacey and The average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Kacey and Effect: Exploring the Correlation Between Name Popularity and Stand-up Maths Video Likes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name "Kacey" and the average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. As researchers, we were determined to answer this head-scratcher with a formula so funny, it would make even the toughest audience split their sides. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we unleashed our statistical prowess to reveal the correlation coefficient of 0.9258804 and p < 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2022.

It turns out, the connection between the name "Kacey" and the success of Stand-up Maths videos is no joke! The results of our analysis unveiled a powerful association, prompting us to quip that "Kacey" may just hold the key to unlocking the perfect punchline. This study not only sheds light on this lighthearted connection, but also adds a dash of humor to the often-serious world of statistical research.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The field of research has long been a serious pursuit, but every now and then, a topic comes along that is so amusing it can make even the most stoic statistician crack a smile. In this paper, we delve into the lighthearted yet intriguing connection between the popularity of the first name "Kacey" and the average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. It's a delightful conundrum that has left us pondering: are individuals with the name "Kacey" more inclined to appreciate the comedic genius of Matt Parker's mathematical musings, or is there a more whimsical explanation at play?
Now, this connection may sound like a stretch at first, but as we delved deeper into the data, the results were nothing short of hilarious! It's as if the statistical analysis itself was an unexpected punchline in a sea of serious research. You might even say we hit a statistical "kacey" and struck comedic gold!
Before we dive into the nitty-gritty of our methodology and findings, it's crucial to underscore the significance of exploring such unconventional correlations. While we often focus on more traditional relationships in research, a study like this serves as a refreshing reminder that statistical analysis can reveal unexpected patterns in the most unexpected places. Plus, who doesn't love a good curveball in the world of data analysis? It's like finding a hidden joke in an equation - a little unexpected, but undeniably delightful!
As we meander through the maze of data and statistics, let's not forget to have a little fun along the way. After all, statistics may be all about significance levels and confidence intervals, but that doesn't mean we can't inject a bit of levity into our findings. So, grab your statistical calculator and get ready to chuckle, because this research is about to take you on a statistical rollercoaster ride with more twists and turns than a complex regression model!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Kacey" and the average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos revealed a striking correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9258804 and an r-squared value of 0.8572545, it's safe to say that the connection between these variables is no laughing matter - well, maybe just a little chuckle. The p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforced the robustness of the association, indicating that these findings are not just an amusing coincidence.
You might say that "Kacey" is the "key" to understanding the popularity of Stand-up Maths! *pun intended*
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 vividly illustrates the strong positive relationship between the two variables, showcasing the data points huddling together like a supportive audience at a stand-up show. The upward trend in the plot is as clear as a well-constructed punchline, leaving no room for doubt about the substantial link between the name "Kacey" and the reception of Stand-up Maths content.
Interestingly, the connection between the first name "Kacey" and the average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos seems to unfold like a perfectly timed joke. When one variable goes up, the other follows suit with confidence, exhibiting a synchrony akin to the comedic timing of a seasoned performer. It's as if "Kacey" and Stand-up Maths likes have an unspoken understanding, an unbreakable bond that transcends statistical analysis and ebbs and flows like the tides of humor.
The strength of this correlation is no laughing matter. It's statistically significant, and it holds the potential to add a dash of amusement to the sometimes mundane world of research. After all, who knew that a name could wield such influence over the digital applause for mathematical comedy? The findings of this study not only point to a compelling relationship but also hint at the delightful unpredictability of statistics. Just when you think you've got all the variables figured out, a new connection emerges, like a punchline that takes you by surprise.
In summary, the results of this investigation offer a revealing glimpse into the playful interplay between the popularity of the name "Kacey" and the appreciation of Stand-up Maths videos. While the correlation may not have you rolling in the aisles, it certainly invites a wry smile at the intriguing dynamics unearthed by this offbeat statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the results of our study uncover a connection so strong, it's like the statistical equivalent of a standing ovation for "Kacey"s everywhere! This correlation sheds light on the delightful interplay between nomenclature and the reception of Stand-up Maths content, proving that statistical analysis can be as amusing as it is enlightening. It's like the perfect blend of math and mirth, a statistical punchline that leaves us all in stitches.

We found that the popularity of the name "Kacey" is more than just a moniker; it's a statistical powerhouse, exerting a significant influence on the likes garnered by Stand-up Maths videos. It's as if "Kacey" holds the key to unlocking laughter and applause in the digital realm - a real "stand-out" revelation, if you will. *insert obligatory dad joke here*

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9258804 and an r-squared value of 0.8572545 highlight the substantial nature of this association, making it clearer than the punchline of a well-crafted joke. The p-value of less than 0.01 further cements the validity of these findings, proving that this connection is no statistical fluke.

Now, you might be thinking, "Is there more research needed in this area?" Well, statistically speaking, the results speak for themselves. Therefore, no more research is needed - except maybe some more puns.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Kacey and Effect: Exploring the Correlation Between Name Popularity and Stand-up Maths Video Likes. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Nameology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Kacey and Effect: Exploring the Correlation Between Name Popularity and Stand-up Maths Video Likes. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Institute for Nameology Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Kacey and Effect: Exploring the Correlation Between Name Popularity and Stand-up Maths Video Likes with an abstract of In this study, we delved into the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name "Kacey" and the average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. As researchers, we were determined to answer this head-scratcher with a formula so funny, it would make even the toughest audience split their sides. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we unleashed our statistical prowess to reveal the correlation coefficient of 0.9258804 and p < 0.01 for the years 2011 to 2022.
It turns out, the connection between the name "Kacey" and the success of Stand-up Maths videos is no joke! The results of our analysis unveiled a powerful association, prompting us to quip that "Kacey" may just hold the key to unlocking the perfect punchline. This study not only sheds light on this lighthearted connection, but also adds a dash of humor to the often-serious world of statistical research.

ChatGPT:

"Kacey popularity," "Stand-up Maths YouTube videos," "correlation"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Kacey
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Kacey
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Kacey

The average number of likes on Matt Parker's YouTube videos
Detailed data title: The average number of likes on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos.
Source: Stand-up Maths on YouTube
See what else correlates with The average number of likes on Matt Parker's YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9258804 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8572545 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The average number of likes on Matt Parker's YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Kacey) over the 12 years from 2011 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.6E-5. 0.0000155416096109018300000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 0.0016% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 64,343 random variables You don't actually need 64 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.75, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Kacey (Babies born)187161157215204208187173244346428404
The average number of likes on Matt Parker's YouTube videos (Average likes)3643.8379481694.3317308.54429.0516185.2121807744.7112014.22629939699.127532.3




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([187,161,157,215,204,208,187,173,244,346,428,404,])
array_2 = np.array([3643.83,7948,1694.33,17308.5,4429.05,16185.2,12180,7744.71,12014.2,26299,39699.1,27532.3,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Kacey"
array_2_name = "The average number of likes on Matt Parker's YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 5568 · Black Variable ID: 3116 · Red Variable ID: 25795
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0