about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,499 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How good Extra History YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Fossil fuel use in Serbia.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Serbia reduces its fossil fuel use, there is less pressure to mine for resources, leading to fewer historical 'dig' videos, ultimately resulting in a decline in the overall quality of Extra History YouTube video titles. It's a real 'relic' of a connection!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image inspired by bauhaus. Depict a scene showing a YouTube video titled "The Decline of Fossil Fuel Use in Serbia" with a thumbnail of a fading coal mine and a graph displaying decreasing emissions. Adjacent to it, visualize an open laptop with the Extra History YouTube channel, presenting titles like "Epic Tales of Serbian History" and "Lost Treasures of Serbia". The visual should illustrate a noticeable decline in historical 'dig' videos due to reduced pressure on mining for resources. Keep the visual components simple, without including any words or speech bubbles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How good Extra History YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in Serbia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Macabre Vaporwave Photorealism Cyber folk inspired by bauhaus
ChatGPT: inspired by bauhaus

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How good Extra History YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in Serbia, in the following situation: As Serbia reduces its fossil fuel use, there is less pressure to mine for resources, leading to fewer historical 'dig' videos, ultimately resulting in a decline in the overall quality of Extra History YouTube video titles. It's a real 'relic' of a connection!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, we see a YouTube video titled "The Decline of Fossil Fuel Use in Serbia" with a thumbnail of a fading coal mine and a graph showing decreasing emissions. Next to it, there's a laptop open with an Extra History YouTube channel displaying titles like "Epic Tales of Serbian History" and "Lost Treasures of Serbia", but these titles look less interesting and exciting compared to the past, reflecting the decline in historical 'dig' videos due to the reduced pressure on mining for resources.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ inspired by bauhaus ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, we see a YouTube video titled "The Decline of Fossil Fuel Use in Serbia" with a thumbnail of a fading coal mine and a graph showing decreasing emissions. Next to it, there's a laptop open with an Extra History YouTube channel displaying titles like "Epic Tales of Serbian History" and "Lost Treasures of Serbia", but these titles look less interesting and exciting compared to the past, reflecting the decline in historical 'dig' videos due to the reduced pressure on mining for resources. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image inspired by bauhaus. Depict a scene showing a YouTube video titled "The Decline of Fossil Fuel Use in Serbia" with a thumbnail of a fading coal mine and a graph displaying decreasing emissions. Adjacent to it, visualize an open laptop with the Extra History YouTube channel, presenting titles like "Epic Tales of Serbian History" and "Lost Treasures of Serbia". The visual should illustrate a noticeable decline in historical 'dig' videos due to reduced pressure on mining for resources. Keep the visual components simple, without including any words or speech bubbles.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in How good Extra History YouTube video titles are caused Fossil fuel use in Serbia to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Fossil Fuel Furore: The Correlation between Grandeur and Gasoline in Serbia

The Journal of Petrochemical Puns

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How good Extra History YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in Serbia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9167241 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Fossil Fuel Furore: The Correlation between "Grandeur" and Gasoline in Serbia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising link between the linguistic prowess of Extra History YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia. We delve into the use of AI analysis to pore over the verbiage of these video titles and their potential impact on the mundane world of fossil fuel use. Through a detailed analysis of over a decade of data, we discovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9167241 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, demonstrating a clear association between the eloquence of video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia. Our findings illuminate the seemingly whimsical influence of historical narratives on the very tangible realm of energy consumption, offering a lighthearted yet thought-provoking twist to the typically dry landscape of energy research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How good Extra History YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in Serbia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fossil Fuel Furore: The Correlation between "Grandeur" and Gasoline in Serbia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising link between the linguistic prowess of Extra History YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia. We delve into the use of AI analysis to pore over the verbiage of these video titles and their potential impact on the mundane world of fossil fuel use. Through a detailed analysis of over a decade of data, we discovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9167241 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, demonstrating a clear association between the eloquence of video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia. Our findings illuminate the seemingly whimsical influence of historical narratives on the very tangible realm of energy consumption, offering a lighthearted yet thought-provoking twist to the typically dry landscape of energy research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between language and behavior has long been a topic of interest across diverse realms of academia. From the nuances of persuasion in marketing to the crafting of legislative jargon, the power of words holds sway over human actions in both the expected and the delightfully unexpected. In this study, we set out to explore the unlikely connection between the linguistic elegance of Extra History YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia.

Our interest in this inquiry was piqued by the striking juxtaposition of historical storytelling and the unassuming realm of energy usage. As the world grapples with the imperative to mitigate climate change and shift towards sustainable energy sources, the unearthing of an association between rhetoric and fossil fuel consumption stands as a compelling blend of the whimsical and the weighty. It is within this captivating terrain that we embark on our investigation, accessorized with data, statistical analyses, and an unabashed penchant for peering into unexpected corridors of scholarly inquiry.

The allure of Extra History lies in its ability to narrate the past with verve and vigor, capturing the imagination and igniting a fervor for historical tales. With each video title serving as a linguistic beacon, drawing viewers into the captivating world of the past, we ventured to ponder: could these compelling narratives be wielding an unforeseen sway over the patterns of gasoline usage in Serbia? As we delved into the realm of AI analysis, we present our findings, both with a scholarly eye and a touch of whimsy, attempting to shed light on the unexpected dance between historical grandeur and the consumption of fossil fuels.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How good Extra History YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in Serbia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fossil Fuel Furore: The Correlation between "Grandeur" and Gasoline in Serbia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising link between the linguistic prowess of Extra History YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia. We delve into the use of AI analysis to pore over the verbiage of these video titles and their potential impact on the mundane world of fossil fuel use. Through a detailed analysis of over a decade of data, we discovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9167241 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, demonstrating a clear association between the eloquence of video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia. Our findings illuminate the seemingly whimsical influence of historical narratives on the very tangible realm of energy consumption, offering a lighthearted yet thought-provoking twist to the typically dry landscape of energy research.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between language and behavior has long been a topic of interest across diverse realms of academia. From the nuances of persuasion in marketing to the crafting of legislative jargon, the power of words holds sway over human actions in both the expected and the delightfully unexpected. In this study, we set out to explore the unlikely connection between the linguistic elegance of Extra History YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia.
Our interest in this inquiry was piqued by the striking juxtaposition of historical storytelling and the unassuming realm of energy usage. As the world grapples with the imperative to mitigate climate change and shift towards sustainable energy sources, the unearthing of an association between rhetoric and fossil fuel consumption stands as a compelling blend of the whimsical and the weighty. It is within this captivating terrain that we embark on our investigation, accessorized with data, statistical analyses, and an unabashed penchant for peering into unexpected corridors of scholarly inquiry.
The allure of Extra History lies in its ability to narrate the past with verve and vigor, capturing the imagination and igniting a fervor for historical tales. With each video title serving as a linguistic beacon, drawing viewers into the captivating world of the past, we ventured to ponder: could these compelling narratives be wielding an unforeseen sway over the patterns of gasoline usage in Serbia? As we delved into the realm of AI analysis, we present our findings, both with a scholarly eye and a touch of whimsy, attempting to shed light on the unexpected dance between historical grandeur and the consumption of fossil fuels.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The investigation of linguistic influence on human behavior has been a subject of enduring fascination in academic circles. Smith and Doe (2016) conducted an extensive analysis of the impact of persuasive language in marketing campaigns, while Jones (2018) delved into the intricacies of legislative jargon and its effects on policy outcomes. However, the intersection of historical narrative and fossil fuel consumption has remained a conspicuously unexplored terrain within the literature.

In "Language and Behavior: A Comprehensive Study," the authors unearth the subtle ways in which linguistic expressions shape human actions, but alas, they did not venture into the realm of historical YouTube video titles and their potential effects on gasoline usage in specific geographic regions. Likewise, "The Power of Words in Decision Making" offers an in-depth exploration of language-driven persuasion, yet it regrettably overlooks the peculiar charm of historical storytelling and its connection to energy consumption patterns.

Turning to non-fiction works, "Energy Landscapes: A Global Perspective" provides a comprehensive overview of factors influencing fossil fuel usage, while "History Reimagined: Perspectives on Narratives of the Past" offers nuanced insights into the art of historical storytelling. However, these esteemed volumes do not address the specific correlation between the linguistic allure of Extra History video titles and the patterns of gasoline usage in Serbia, leaving this captivating linkage to languish in obscurity.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, "Fueling the Imagination: Stories of Energy and Adventure" tantalizes with its title, hinting at the potential intersection between historical grandeur and fuel consumption, albeit within the realm of fictional narratives. Furthermore, "Echoes of the Past: Time-Travel Tales" conjures visions of historical reverberations that transcend temporal boundaries, yet fails to provide empirical evidence of their impact on real-world gasoline consumption.

In a similarly whimsical vein, children’s cartoons and shows such as "The Magic School Bus" and "Bill Nye the Science Guy" have regaled audiences with their educational yet entertaining forays into the realms of science and history. While these beloved productions may not directly illuminate the connection between YouTube video titles and fossil fuel use, they stand as testaments to the enduring allure of educational entertainment and its potential to shape the realms of knowledge and behavior.

As we navigate the scholarly landscape, adorned with our data and statistical analyses, we recognize the need to inject a dash of humor and levity into our inquiry. The enthralling dance between the grandeur of history and the unassuming world of fossil fuel consumption beckons us onward, poised to unravel the unexpected confluence of linguistic charm and energy usage in Serbia.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How good Extra History YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in Serbia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fossil Fuel Furore: The Correlation between "Grandeur" and Gasoline in Serbia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising link between the linguistic prowess of Extra History YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia. We delve into the use of AI analysis to pore over the verbiage of these video titles and their potential impact on the mundane world of fossil fuel use. Through a detailed analysis of over a decade of data, we discovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9167241 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, demonstrating a clear association between the eloquence of video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia. Our findings illuminate the seemingly whimsical influence of historical narratives on the very tangible realm of energy consumption, offering a lighthearted yet thought-provoking twist to the typically dry landscape of energy research.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between language and behavior has long been a topic of interest across diverse realms of academia. From the nuances of persuasion in marketing to the crafting of legislative jargon, the power of words holds sway over human actions in both the expected and the delightfully unexpected. In this study, we set out to explore the unlikely connection between the linguistic elegance of Extra History YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia.
Our interest in this inquiry was piqued by the striking juxtaposition of historical storytelling and the unassuming realm of energy usage. As the world grapples with the imperative to mitigate climate change and shift towards sustainable energy sources, the unearthing of an association between rhetoric and fossil fuel consumption stands as a compelling blend of the whimsical and the weighty. It is within this captivating terrain that we embark on our investigation, accessorized with data, statistical analyses, and an unabashed penchant for peering into unexpected corridors of scholarly inquiry.
The allure of Extra History lies in its ability to narrate the past with verve and vigor, capturing the imagination and igniting a fervor for historical tales. With each video title serving as a linguistic beacon, drawing viewers into the captivating world of the past, we ventured to ponder: could these compelling narratives be wielding an unforeseen sway over the patterns of gasoline usage in Serbia? As we delved into the realm of AI analysis, we present our findings, both with a scholarly eye and a touch of whimsy, attempting to shed light on the unexpected dance between historical grandeur and the consumption of fossil fuels.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the curious relationship between the linguistic finesse of Extra History YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia, we embarked on a methodological journey adorned with statistical tools and a hint of digital wizardry. Our team amassed data from 2012 to 2021, capturing the effervescent evolution of both historical narratives and fossil fuel usage within this temporal span.

The keystone of our data collection process was the deployment of advanced AI analysis to scrutinize the lexical tapestries woven within the titles of Extra History videos. This entailed the use of natural language processing algorithms to discern the linguistic nuances, emotional undercurrents, and captivating appeal imbued within each title. As we delved into the intricacies of these textual marvels, our fervid exploration extended towards unearthing the kaleidoscopic facets of historical storytelling and its potential reverberations on the consumption patterns of fossil fuels.

In parallel, we harnessed data on fossil fuel use in Serbia from the venerable Energy Information Administration, encapsulating the empirical trajectories of gasoline consumption amidst the historical symphonies narrated by Extra History. The synergy of these disparate yet harmonious datasets bestowed upon us a unique vantage point from which to unravel the interplay of verbal flair and vehicular fuel.

Upon amalgamating the linguistic opulence of video titles with the empirical bedrock of fossil fuel consumption data, we unleashed a plethora of statistical analyses to distill the essence of this intriguing correlation. Leveraging robust measures of association, including Pearson's correlation coefficient and regression modeling, we sought to illuminate the interlacing threads of linguistic charisma and energy utilization. Furthermore, we meticulously scrutinized the aesthetically pleasing yet rigorously significant p-values to underscore the statistical gravitas of our findings.

In essence, our methodology was a vibrant concoction of linguistic scrutiny, data harmonization, and statistical alchemy, weaving together the tapestries of historical eloquence and petrol-powered pathways with a blend of scholarly rigor and jovial curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How good Extra History YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in Serbia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9167241, r-squared of 0.8403830, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fossil Fuel Furore: The Correlation between "Grandeur" and Gasoline in Serbia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising link between the linguistic prowess of Extra History YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia. We delve into the use of AI analysis to pore over the verbiage of these video titles and their potential impact on the mundane world of fossil fuel use. Through a detailed analysis of over a decade of data, we discovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9167241 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, demonstrating a clear association between the eloquence of video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia. Our findings illuminate the seemingly whimsical influence of historical narratives on the very tangible realm of energy consumption, offering a lighthearted yet thought-provoking twist to the typically dry landscape of energy research.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between language and behavior has long been a topic of interest across diverse realms of academia. From the nuances of persuasion in marketing to the crafting of legislative jargon, the power of words holds sway over human actions in both the expected and the delightfully unexpected. In this study, we set out to explore the unlikely connection between the linguistic elegance of Extra History YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia.
Our interest in this inquiry was piqued by the striking juxtaposition of historical storytelling and the unassuming realm of energy usage. As the world grapples with the imperative to mitigate climate change and shift towards sustainable energy sources, the unearthing of an association between rhetoric and fossil fuel consumption stands as a compelling blend of the whimsical and the weighty. It is within this captivating terrain that we embark on our investigation, accessorized with data, statistical analyses, and an unabashed penchant for peering into unexpected corridors of scholarly inquiry.
The allure of Extra History lies in its ability to narrate the past with verve and vigor, capturing the imagination and igniting a fervor for historical tales. With each video title serving as a linguistic beacon, drawing viewers into the captivating world of the past, we ventured to ponder: could these compelling narratives be wielding an unforeseen sway over the patterns of gasoline usage in Serbia? As we delved into the realm of AI analysis, we present our findings, both with a scholarly eye and a touch of whimsy, attempting to shed light on the unexpected dance between historical grandeur and the consumption of fossil fuels.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of a decade of data spanning from 2012 to 2021 yielded intriguing insights into the connection between the linguistic sophistication of Extra History YouTube video titles and the utilization of fossil fuels in Serbia. We discovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9167241, indicating a strong positive relationship between the eloquence of video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels. This coefficient was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8403830, representing the proportion of the variation in fossil fuel use that can be explained by the linguistic prowess of the video titles.

The statistical significance of our findings was underscored by a p-value of less than 0.01, lending credence to the observed association. This p-value provides compelling evidence against the null hypothesis, bolstering the notion that the verbiage of Extra History video titles exerts a discernible influence on the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia.

Moreover, our analysis culminates in the depiction of a scatterplot (see Fig. 1), visually portraying the robust positive correlation between the linguistic grandeur of video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels. The scatterplot exudes an air of whimsy, juxtaposing the seemingly disparate realms of historical storytelling and energy consumption, thereby encapsulating the essence of our unexpected yet compelling findings.

In summary, our results unveil an unanticipated and engaging liaison between the artful storytelling of Extra History video titles and the tangible realm of fossil fuel use in Serbia, adding a dash of historical grandeur to the relatively mundane sphere of energy research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How good Extra History YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in Serbia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Fossil Fuel Furore: The Correlation between "Grandeur" and Gasoline in Serbia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising link between the linguistic prowess of Extra History YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia. We delve into the use of AI analysis to pore over the verbiage of these video titles and their potential impact on the mundane world of fossil fuel use. Through a detailed analysis of over a decade of data, we discovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9167241 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, demonstrating a clear association between the eloquence of video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia. Our findings illuminate the seemingly whimsical influence of historical narratives on the very tangible realm of energy consumption, offering a lighthearted yet thought-provoking twist to the typically dry landscape of energy research.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation of linguistic influence on human behavior has been a subject of enduring fascination in academic circles. Smith and Doe (2016) conducted an extensive analysis of the impact of persuasive language in marketing campaigns, while Jones (2018) delved into the intricacies of legislative jargon and its effects on policy outcomes. However, the intersection of historical narrative and fossil fuel consumption has remained a conspicuously unexplored terrain within the literature.
In "Language and Behavior: A Comprehensive Study," the authors unearth the subtle ways in which linguistic expressions shape human actions, but alas, they did not venture into the realm of historical YouTube video titles and their potential effects on gasoline usage in specific geographic regions. Likewise, "The Power of Words in Decision Making" offers an in-depth exploration of language-driven persuasion, yet it regrettably overlooks the peculiar charm of historical storytelling and its connection to energy consumption patterns.
Turning to non-fiction works, "Energy Landscapes: A Global Perspective" provides a comprehensive overview of factors influencing fossil fuel usage, while "History Reimagined: Perspectives on Narratives of the Past" offers nuanced insights into the art of historical storytelling. However, these esteemed volumes do not address the specific correlation between the linguistic allure of Extra History video titles and the patterns of gasoline usage in Serbia, leaving this captivating linkage to languish in obscurity.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, "Fueling the Imagination: Stories of Energy and Adventure" tantalizes with its title, hinting at the potential intersection between historical grandeur and fuel consumption, albeit within the realm of fictional narratives. Furthermore, "Echoes of the Past: Time-Travel Tales" conjures visions of historical reverberations that transcend temporal boundaries, yet fails to provide empirical evidence of their impact on real-world gasoline consumption.
In a similarly whimsical vein, children’s cartoons and shows such as "The Magic School Bus" and "Bill Nye the Science Guy" have regaled audiences with their educational yet entertaining forays into the realms of science and history. While these beloved productions may not directly illuminate the connection between YouTube video titles and fossil fuel use, they stand as testaments to the enduring allure of educational entertainment and its potential to shape the realms of knowledge and behavior.
As we navigate the scholarly landscape, adorned with our data and statistical analyses, we recognize the need to inject a dash of humor and levity into our inquiry. The enthralling dance between the grandeur of history and the unassuming world of fossil fuel consumption beckons us onward, poised to unravel the unexpected confluence of linguistic charm and energy usage in Serbia.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of a decade of data spanning from 2012 to 2021 yielded intriguing insights into the connection between the linguistic sophistication of Extra History YouTube video titles and the utilization of fossil fuels in Serbia. We discovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9167241, indicating a strong positive relationship between the eloquence of video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels. This coefficient was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8403830, representing the proportion of the variation in fossil fuel use that can be explained by the linguistic prowess of the video titles.
The statistical significance of our findings was underscored by a p-value of less than 0.01, lending credence to the observed association. This p-value provides compelling evidence against the null hypothesis, bolstering the notion that the verbiage of Extra History video titles exerts a discernible influence on the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia.
Moreover, our analysis culminates in the depiction of a scatterplot (see Fig. 1), visually portraying the robust positive correlation between the linguistic grandeur of video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels. The scatterplot exudes an air of whimsy, juxtaposing the seemingly disparate realms of historical storytelling and energy consumption, thereby encapsulating the essence of our unexpected yet compelling findings.
In summary, our results unveil an unanticipated and engaging liaison between the artful storytelling of Extra History video titles and the tangible realm of fossil fuel use in Serbia, adding a dash of historical grandeur to the relatively mundane sphere of energy research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The observed correlation coefficient of 0.9167241 between the linguistic grandeur of Extra History YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia serves as a poignant reminder of the unforeseen intersections that can emerge in the dynamic tapestry of human behavior and cultural influence. Our findings not only reaffirm, but also extend the existing literature on the impact of linguistic expressions on real-world phenomena.

Taking a lighthearted yet rigorous approach, we revisited the literature to draw inspiration from the oft-overlooked realms of fiction and educational entertainment. Surprisingly, our investigation uncovered a striking resonance between the captivating allure of historical storytelling and the palpable patterns of gasoline usage in Serbia. This whimsical connection invites scholars to broaden their perspectives and embrace the multifaceted influence of language and narrative in shaping human actions—be it through persuasive marketing campaigns, legislative jargon, or, as our study illuminates, the artful crafting of YouTube video titles.

Moreover, the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 stands as a steadfast beacon, dispelling any lingering doubts and underscoring the robustness of the observed association. This finding further underscores the tantalizing dynamism of linguistic charm in driving tangible shifts in energy consumption patterns, akin to the delightful antics of “The Magic School Bus” and the thought-provoking musings of “Bill Nye the Science Guy”—all emblematic of cultural touchstones that subtly mold perceptions and behaviors.

Indeed, our results not only substantiate the supposition that historical narratives wield a discernible influence over the utilization of fossil fuels in Serbia, but also pave the way for future endeavors to unravel the intricate mechanisms underlying this curious linkage. As we draw inspiration from the unexpected resonance between seemingly unrelated domains, we must not overlook the transformative potential of historical storytelling in shaping the intricate tapestry of human decisions, behaviors, and—even, as our study ardently suggests, the mundane yet deeply impactful realm of fossil fuel use. The scatterplot, with its visual depiction of the entwined realms of linguistic charm and energy consumption, encapsulates the captivating adventures that unfold when scholarly inquiry intersects with unforeseen corridors of human experience. We thus stand poised, imbued with the breathless anticipation of unraveling the captivating enigma that underscores the liaison between historical grandeur and the practical realm of fuel consumption.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How good Extra History YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in Serbia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Fossil Fuel Furore: The Correlation between "Grandeur" and Gasoline in Serbia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising link between the linguistic prowess of Extra History YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia. We delve into the use of AI analysis to pore over the verbiage of these video titles and their potential impact on the mundane world of fossil fuel use. Through a detailed analysis of over a decade of data, we discovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9167241 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, demonstrating a clear association between the eloquence of video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia. Our findings illuminate the seemingly whimsical influence of historical narratives on the very tangible realm of energy consumption, offering a lighthearted yet thought-provoking twist to the typically dry landscape of energy research.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between language and behavior has long been a topic of interest across diverse realms of academia. From the nuances of persuasion in marketing to the crafting of legislative jargon, the power of words holds sway over human actions in both the expected and the delightfully unexpected. In this study, we set out to explore the unlikely connection between the linguistic elegance of Extra History YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia.
Our interest in this inquiry was piqued by the striking juxtaposition of historical storytelling and the unassuming realm of energy usage. As the world grapples with the imperative to mitigate climate change and shift towards sustainable energy sources, the unearthing of an association between rhetoric and fossil fuel consumption stands as a compelling blend of the whimsical and the weighty. It is within this captivating terrain that we embark on our investigation, accessorized with data, statistical analyses, and an unabashed penchant for peering into unexpected corridors of scholarly inquiry.
The allure of Extra History lies in its ability to narrate the past with verve and vigor, capturing the imagination and igniting a fervor for historical tales. With each video title serving as a linguistic beacon, drawing viewers into the captivating world of the past, we ventured to ponder: could these compelling narratives be wielding an unforeseen sway over the patterns of gasoline usage in Serbia? As we delved into the realm of AI analysis, we present our findings, both with a scholarly eye and a touch of whimsy, attempting to shed light on the unexpected dance between historical grandeur and the consumption of fossil fuels.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of a decade of data spanning from 2012 to 2021 yielded intriguing insights into the connection between the linguistic sophistication of Extra History YouTube video titles and the utilization of fossil fuels in Serbia. We discovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9167241, indicating a strong positive relationship between the eloquence of video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels. This coefficient was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8403830, representing the proportion of the variation in fossil fuel use that can be explained by the linguistic prowess of the video titles.
The statistical significance of our findings was underscored by a p-value of less than 0.01, lending credence to the observed association. This p-value provides compelling evidence against the null hypothesis, bolstering the notion that the verbiage of Extra History video titles exerts a discernible influence on the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia.
Moreover, our analysis culminates in the depiction of a scatterplot (see Fig. 1), visually portraying the robust positive correlation between the linguistic grandeur of video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels. The scatterplot exudes an air of whimsy, juxtaposing the seemingly disparate realms of historical storytelling and energy consumption, thereby encapsulating the essence of our unexpected yet compelling findings.
In summary, our results unveil an unanticipated and engaging liaison between the artful storytelling of Extra History video titles and the tangible realm of fossil fuel use in Serbia, adding a dash of historical grandeur to the relatively mundane sphere of energy research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has brought to light a captivating association between the linguistic finesse of Extra History YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia. The robust correlation coefficient and the statistically significant p-value underscore the surprising sway of historical storytelling on the realm of energy usage. This unexpected nexus highlights the whimsical yet impactful nature of language, as it weaves a tale of influence across seemingly unrelated domains.

While our findings offer a lighthearted twist to the typically serious discourse on energy consumption, it also prompts a deeper reflection on the pervasive influence of storytelling in shaping human behavior. The allure of historical narratives, it seems, extends beyond the realms of imagination and nostalgia, permeating into the very fabric of societal actions, even in the realm of fuel consumption.

As we wrap up this investigation, it is worth noting that this correlation, while intriguing, does not imply causation. It merely points to a parallel trend between the linguistic allure of video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia. However, the whimsy of this discovery invites further contemplation on the unexpected corridors of influence in our world.

In light of these compelling revelations, we assert that no additional research is needed in this area. The whimsical dance between historical grandeur and fossil fuel use in Serbia has been illuminated, leaving us with a tantalizing appreciation for the unexpected interplay of language and behavior.

The scholarly inquiry now rests, leaving this unconventional link between historical storytelling and energy consumption to linger in the annals of statistical whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fossil Fuel Furore: The Correlation between Grandeur and Gasoline in Serbia. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Petrochemical Puns


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fossil Fuel Furore: The Correlation between Grandeur and Gasoline in Serbia. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Society for Petrological Illumination Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fossil Fuel Furore: The Correlation between Grandeur and Gasoline in Serbia with an abstract of This paper investigates the surprising link between the linguistic prowess of Extra History YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia. We delve into the use of AI analysis to pore over the verbiage of these video titles and their potential impact on the mundane world of fossil fuel use. Through a detailed analysis of over a decade of data, we discovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9167241 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, demonstrating a clear association between the eloquence of video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Serbia. Our findings illuminate the seemingly whimsical influence of historical narratives on the very tangible realm of energy consumption, offering a lighthearted yet thought-provoking twist to the typically dry landscape of energy research.

ChatGPT:

fossil fuels, grandeur, gasoline, Serbia, linguistic prowess, Extra History YouTube, AI analysis, video titles, correlation coefficient, p-value, energy consumption, historical narratives

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How good Extra History YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How good Extra History YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How good Extra History YouTube video titles are

Fossil fuel use in Serbia
Detailed data title: Total fossil fuel use in Serbia in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Fossil fuel use in Serbia

Correlation r = 0.9167241 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8403830 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Fossil fuel use in Serbia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How good Extra History YouTube video titles are) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00019. 0.0001901000304550959000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 0.019% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 5,260 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.68, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
How good Extra History YouTube video titles are (Score (out of 10))7.65047.79637.46037.61037.71887.68037.56717.64137.61547.5814
Fossil fuel use in Serbia (Billion kWh)25.266327.262821.067324.910225.130224.499123.22123.424124.438622.575




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7.6504,7.7963,7.4603,7.6103,7.7188,7.6803,7.5671,7.6413,7.6154,7.5814,])
array_2 = np.array([25.2663,27.2628,21.0673,24.9102,25.1302,24.4991,23.221,23.4241,24.4386,22.575,])
array_1_name = "How good Extra History YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Fossil fuel use in Serbia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 5499 · Black Variable ID: 25788 · Red Variable ID: 23954
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0