about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,487 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Holland, Michigan and the second variable is Google searches for 'Titanic'.  The chart goes from 2008 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The air pollution created a haze over the city, leading people to reminisce about the foggy scenes in Titanic. As the smog thickened, so did their interest in the ill-fated ship, prompting them to embark on a virtual journey through the search engine waters of Google.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image of a cityscape in Holland, Michigan, shrouded in a hazy fog of air pollution. The dimmed view of buildings and cars creates an atmosphere reminiscent of the misty scenes from the Titanic movie. People walking about are obscured by the smog, some of them visibly reaching for their phones to search for 'Titanic' on Google, initiating an online exploration of the historic ship. Enhanced Prompt: Create a realistic and immersive cityscape of Holland, Michigan, blanketed in a hazy fog of air pollution. The fog should be depicted as swirling and thick, partially obscuring the buildings and cars in the surroundings. The scene should convey a sense of mystery and nostalgia, evoking the atmospheric mood from the Titanic movie. Include a few individuals walking about, their forms partially obscured by the smog. Some of them should be depicted reaching for their phones, as if searching for 'Titanic' on Google. The composition should capture the intersection between the real-world environment and the digital exploration of history in a visually compelling manner. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Holland, Michigan and Google searches for 'Titanic'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Hyper-realistic Surrealism Minimalism Charcoal Realistic
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Holland, Michigan and Google searches for 'Titanic', in the following situation: The air pollution created a haze over the city, leading people to reminisce about the foggy scenes in Titanic. As the smog thickened, so did their interest in the ill-fated ship, prompting them to embark on a virtual journey through the search engine waters of Google.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Holland, Michigan, a hazy fog of air pollution blankets the city, dimming the view of buildings and cars. People walking about are reminded of the misty scenes from the Titanic movie. As the hazy smog intensifies, more and more individuals can be seen taking out their phones to search for 'Titanic' on Google, diving into an online exploration of the historic ship.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In Holland, Michigan, a hazy fog of air pollution blankets the city, dimming the view of buildings and cars. People walking about are reminded of the misty scenes from the Titanic movie. As the hazy smog intensifies, more and more individuals can be seen taking out their phones to search for 'Titanic' on Google, diving into an online exploration of the historic ship. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image of a cityscape in Holland, Michigan, shrouded in a hazy fog of air pollution. The dimmed view of buildings and cars creates an atmosphere reminiscent of the misty scenes from the Titanic movie. People walking about are obscured by the smog, some of them visibly reaching for their phones to search for 'Titanic' on Google, initiating an online exploration of the historic ship. Enhanced Prompt: Create a realistic and immersive cityscape of Holland, Michigan, blanketed in a hazy fog of air pollution. The fog should be depicted as swirling and thick, partially obscuring the buildings and cars in the surroundings. The scene should convey a sense of mystery and nostalgia, evoking the atmospheric mood from the Titanic movie. Include a few individuals walking about, their forms partially obscured by the smog. Some of them should be depicted reaching for their phones, as if searching for 'Titanic' on Google. The composition should capture the intersection between the real-world environment and the digital exploration of history in a visually compelling manner.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air pollution in Holland, Michigan caused Titanic (Google searches for 'Titanic') to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Navigating Through The Netherlands: Air Pollution's Impact on Google Searches for 'Titanic'

The Journal of Atmospheric and Cultural Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Holland, Michigan and Google searches for 'Titanic'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9002913 and p < 0.01 for 2008 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Navigating Through The Netherlands: Air Pollution's Impact on Google Searches for 'Titanic'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set sail on the choppy seas of data to investigate the curious connection between air pollution in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for the iconic film 'Titanic'. We embarked on this journey with the determination of a sailor chasing a mermaid and the curiosity of a cat eyeing a canary.

Our research team meticulously collected and analyzed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to dissect this enigmatic correlation. We found ourselves knee-deep in numbers, like a mathematician wading through an ocean of equations. The correlation coefficient of 0.9002913 and p < 0.01 from our analysis from 2008 to 2023 had us feeling as giddy as a sailor spotting land after a long voyage.

Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong positive correlation between air pollution levels in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for 'Titanic'. It seems that when the air quality worsened, interest in the doomed ship soared, much like the ship itself on that fateful night. It's as if the residents of Holland, Michigan, sought solace in the tragic romance of Jack and Rose amidst the polluted air, perhaps to remind themselves that even in challenging times, love can still prevail.

In conclusion, our research sheds light on the unexpected relationship between environmental factors and pop culture phenomena. As researchers, we take pride in uncovering these correlations, even if they are as surprising as a kraken emerging from the depths. So, the next time you're in Holland, Michigan and the air feels a bit foggy, remember that the 'Titanic' may be sailing through the search engine seas of Google yet again.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Holland, Michigan and Google searches for 'Titanic'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Navigating Through The Netherlands: Air Pollution's Impact on Google Searches for 'Titanic'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set sail on the choppy seas of data to investigate the curious connection between air pollution in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for the iconic film 'Titanic'. We embarked on this journey with the determination of a sailor chasing a mermaid and the curiosity of a cat eyeing a canary.

Our research team meticulously collected and analyzed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to dissect this enigmatic correlation. We found ourselves knee-deep in numbers, like a mathematician wading through an ocean of equations. The correlation coefficient of 0.9002913 and p < 0.01 from our analysis from 2008 to 2023 had us feeling as giddy as a sailor spotting land after a long voyage.

Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong positive correlation between air pollution levels in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for 'Titanic'. It seems that when the air quality worsened, interest in the doomed ship soared, much like the ship itself on that fateful night. It's as if the residents of Holland, Michigan, sought solace in the tragic romance of Jack and Rose amidst the polluted air, perhaps to remind themselves that even in challenging times, love can still prevail.

In conclusion, our research sheds light on the unexpected relationship between environmental factors and pop culture phenomena. As researchers, we take pride in uncovering these correlations, even if they are as surprising as a kraken emerging from the depths. So, the next time you're in Holland, Michigan and the air feels a bit foggy, remember that the 'Titanic' may be sailing through the search engine seas of Google yet again.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the old saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire," but in the case of our research, where there's air pollution, there's an unexpected surge in Google searches for 'Titanic'. It's a correlation that's as puzzling as trying to find your car keys in the Bermuda Triangle.

Air pollution is a serious issue, with consequences ranging from respiratory problems to environmental degradation. So, when our team stumbled upon the possibility of a connection between air pollution levels in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for the tragic tale of the 'Titanic', we were as shocked as a ship hitting an iceberg in the middle of the night.

The idea that a spike in air pollution could lead to a spike in searches for a cinematic tragedy may seem as unlikely as a penguin becoming a top hat model. However, as researchers, we are duty-bound to investigate even the most seemingly improbable connections, much like a detective tasked with solving a case of mistaken identity.

Our data journey took us through the murky waters of statistical analysis, where we navigated through waves of numbers and charts with the determination of a ship captain steering through a storm. The correlation we discovered between air pollution levels and 'Titanic' searches left us feeling as buoyant as a lifeboat in the North Atlantic Ocean.

But what could possibly drive individuals to seek out information about a tragic shipwreck in response to declining air quality? It's a question as confounding as why the band kept playing as the 'Titanic' sank. Nonetheless, our findings point to a compelling link between environmental distress and a cultural touchstone, reminding us that human curiosity knows no bounds, even when obscured by a fog of pollutants.

In this paper, we present our findings with the hope that it sparks further exploration and discussion. And remember, when you find yourself knee-deep in unexpected correlations, just keep swimming, much like the resilient survivors of the 'Titanic'.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Holland, Michigan and Google searches for 'Titanic'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Navigating Through The Netherlands: Air Pollution's Impact on Google Searches for 'Titanic'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set sail on the choppy seas of data to investigate the curious connection between air pollution in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for the iconic film 'Titanic'. We embarked on this journey with the determination of a sailor chasing a mermaid and the curiosity of a cat eyeing a canary.

Our research team meticulously collected and analyzed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to dissect this enigmatic correlation. We found ourselves knee-deep in numbers, like a mathematician wading through an ocean of equations. The correlation coefficient of 0.9002913 and p < 0.01 from our analysis from 2008 to 2023 had us feeling as giddy as a sailor spotting land after a long voyage.

Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong positive correlation between air pollution levels in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for 'Titanic'. It seems that when the air quality worsened, interest in the doomed ship soared, much like the ship itself on that fateful night. It's as if the residents of Holland, Michigan, sought solace in the tragic romance of Jack and Rose amidst the polluted air, perhaps to remind themselves that even in challenging times, love can still prevail.

In conclusion, our research sheds light on the unexpected relationship between environmental factors and pop culture phenomena. As researchers, we take pride in uncovering these correlations, even if they are as surprising as a kraken emerging from the depths. So, the next time you're in Holland, Michigan and the air feels a bit foggy, remember that the 'Titanic' may be sailing through the search engine seas of Google yet again.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the old saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire," but in the case of our research, where there's air pollution, there's an unexpected surge in Google searches for 'Titanic'. It's a correlation that's as puzzling as trying to find your car keys in the Bermuda Triangle.
Air pollution is a serious issue, with consequences ranging from respiratory problems to environmental degradation. So, when our team stumbled upon the possibility of a connection between air pollution levels in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for the tragic tale of the 'Titanic', we were as shocked as a ship hitting an iceberg in the middle of the night.
The idea that a spike in air pollution could lead to a spike in searches for a cinematic tragedy may seem as unlikely as a penguin becoming a top hat model. However, as researchers, we are duty-bound to investigate even the most seemingly improbable connections, much like a detective tasked with solving a case of mistaken identity.
Our data journey took us through the murky waters of statistical analysis, where we navigated through waves of numbers and charts with the determination of a ship captain steering through a storm. The correlation we discovered between air pollution levels and 'Titanic' searches left us feeling as buoyant as a lifeboat in the North Atlantic Ocean.
But what could possibly drive individuals to seek out information about a tragic shipwreck in response to declining air quality? It's a question as confounding as why the band kept playing as the 'Titanic' sank. Nonetheless, our findings point to a compelling link between environmental distress and a cultural touchstone, reminding us that human curiosity knows no bounds, even when obscured by a fog of pollutants.
In this paper, we present our findings with the hope that it sparks further exploration and discussion. And remember, when you find yourself knee-deep in unexpected correlations, just keep swimming, much like the resilient survivors of the 'Titanic'.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The curious correlation between air pollution in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for the film 'Titanic' has captured the attention of researchers and academics alike. Smith et al. in "Air Quality and Cultural Interests" investigated the association between environmental factors and public interest in historical events through online search queries. Their study laid the groundwork for exploring the intersection of air pollution and popular culture, paving the way for our current investigation. With the precision of an Olympic archer, they took aim at understanding how environmental conditions may influence societal interests.

Doe and Jones, in "The Impact of Environmental Factors on Media Consumption," delved into the relationship between air quality and media consumption habits. Their findings echoed the sentiment that fluctuations in air pollution levels could elicit shifts in the type of content consumed by the public. However, their work primarily focused on traditional media, leaving a gap in our understanding of how digital search behavior may be affected by environmental variables.

Venturing beyond the realm of academic research, books such as "The Air We Breathe" by Andrea Barrett and "Environmental Pollution: Health and Environmental Quality in Holland, Michigan" by Nigel Bell shed light on the impact of air pollution on human health and well-being. These literary works provide a backdrop for understanding the real-world consequences of environmental degradation, grounding our exploration of the unexpected connection between air quality and cultural fascination.

Turning our attention to fictional works, novels like "Fog Over Frisco" by Dashiell Hammett and "Smoke Gets in Your Eyes" by Caitlin Doughty transport readers into atmospheric settings where environmental elements play a prominent role. While these books may not directly tackle the correlation between air pollution and 'Titanic' searches, they offer a glimpse into the evocative power of environmental conditions in storytelling, reminding us that even the thickest fog can't obscure a good tale.

Pivoting to unconventional sources, our research team deployed an unorthodox approach to gather insights. In a daring departure from standard scholarly practices, we conducted an extensive review of the backs of shampoo bottles, searching for hidden wisdom amidst ingredient lists and usage instructions. While we didn't find any direct references to air pollution and 'Titanic' searches, we did uncover some surprisingly poetic descriptions of ocean-inspired fragrances, serving as a poignant reminder of the enduring allure of maritime narratives.

In the sea of literature surrounding our research topic, our findings stand out as a lighthouse guiding future investigations into the unexpected interplay of environmental conditions and cultural phenomena. As we navigate through the waves of data and scholarly discourse, let us remember that even the most unconventional connections can lead to illuminating discoveries, much like stumbling upon a treasure chest in the unlikeliest of places.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Holland, Michigan and Google searches for 'Titanic'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends . You used data from 2008 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Navigating Through The Netherlands: Air Pollution's Impact on Google Searches for 'Titanic'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set sail on the choppy seas of data to investigate the curious connection between air pollution in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for the iconic film 'Titanic'. We embarked on this journey with the determination of a sailor chasing a mermaid and the curiosity of a cat eyeing a canary.

Our research team meticulously collected and analyzed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to dissect this enigmatic correlation. We found ourselves knee-deep in numbers, like a mathematician wading through an ocean of equations. The correlation coefficient of 0.9002913 and p < 0.01 from our analysis from 2008 to 2023 had us feeling as giddy as a sailor spotting land after a long voyage.

Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong positive correlation between air pollution levels in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for 'Titanic'. It seems that when the air quality worsened, interest in the doomed ship soared, much like the ship itself on that fateful night. It's as if the residents of Holland, Michigan, sought solace in the tragic romance of Jack and Rose amidst the polluted air, perhaps to remind themselves that even in challenging times, love can still prevail.

In conclusion, our research sheds light on the unexpected relationship between environmental factors and pop culture phenomena. As researchers, we take pride in uncovering these correlations, even if they are as surprising as a kraken emerging from the depths. So, the next time you're in Holland, Michigan and the air feels a bit foggy, remember that the 'Titanic' may be sailing through the search engine seas of Google yet again.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the old saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire," but in the case of our research, where there's air pollution, there's an unexpected surge in Google searches for 'Titanic'. It's a correlation that's as puzzling as trying to find your car keys in the Bermuda Triangle.
Air pollution is a serious issue, with consequences ranging from respiratory problems to environmental degradation. So, when our team stumbled upon the possibility of a connection between air pollution levels in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for the tragic tale of the 'Titanic', we were as shocked as a ship hitting an iceberg in the middle of the night.
The idea that a spike in air pollution could lead to a spike in searches for a cinematic tragedy may seem as unlikely as a penguin becoming a top hat model. However, as researchers, we are duty-bound to investigate even the most seemingly improbable connections, much like a detective tasked with solving a case of mistaken identity.
Our data journey took us through the murky waters of statistical analysis, where we navigated through waves of numbers and charts with the determination of a ship captain steering through a storm. The correlation we discovered between air pollution levels and 'Titanic' searches left us feeling as buoyant as a lifeboat in the North Atlantic Ocean.
But what could possibly drive individuals to seek out information about a tragic shipwreck in response to declining air quality? It's a question as confounding as why the band kept playing as the 'Titanic' sank. Nonetheless, our findings point to a compelling link between environmental distress and a cultural touchstone, reminding us that human curiosity knows no bounds, even when obscured by a fog of pollutants.
In this paper, we present our findings with the hope that it sparks further exploration and discussion. And remember, when you find yourself knee-deep in unexpected correlations, just keep swimming, much like the resilient survivors of the 'Titanic'.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on our exploration of the connection between air pollution in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for 'Titanic', we assembled a crack team of researchers with the tenacity of Captain Ahab and the curiosity of a group of teenagers exploring a haunted house. Our study spanned the years 2008 to 2023, capturing a wide swath of data like a fisherman casting a net into a school of data points.

First, we gathered air quality data from the Environmental Protection Agency, embracing the numbers like a hug from a long-lost friend. We sifted through these data like an archaeologist carefully brushing away dirt from an ancient artifact, ensuring that our air pollution measurements were as reliable as a loyal first mate.

Next, we delved into the vast ocean of online search behavior using Google Trends, navigating through keyword searches like a sailor charting a course through treacherous waters. We monitored the frequency of searches for 'Titanic' with the vigilance of a lookout keeping an eye on the horizon for potential trouble.

Now, here comes the twist in our methodology – we took into account not just the raw numbers, but the emotional climate as well. We analyzed the public sentiment surrounding 'Titanic' using sentiment analysis tools, which allowed us to gauge the mood of the online populace in response to changing air pollution levels. We wanted to understand not just the quantity of searches, but also the qualitative response, because sometimes it's not just about the destination, but the emotional journey too.

To ensure the robustness of our findings, we employed advanced statistical techniques, including linear regression and time series analysis. We wanted to avoid any statistical pitfalls like a sailor avoiding the siren call, so we double-checked our calculations with the precision of a ship's navigator using the stars to chart their course.

Finally, we conducted a meta-analysis of existing literature on the intersection of environmental factors and public interest in popular culture. Much like a sailor consulting ancient maps before setting sail, we sought to contextualize our findings within the broader body of knowledge, ensuring that our contributions were as impactful as a well-aimed cannonball.

And remember, when in doubt, just keep afloat and steer into the dad jokes – after all, they're the lifebuoys of academia!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Holland, Michigan and Google searches for 'Titanic'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends .

For the time period 2008 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9002913, r-squared of 0.8105245, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Navigating Through The Netherlands: Air Pollution's Impact on Google Searches for 'Titanic'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set sail on the choppy seas of data to investigate the curious connection between air pollution in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for the iconic film 'Titanic'. We embarked on this journey with the determination of a sailor chasing a mermaid and the curiosity of a cat eyeing a canary.

Our research team meticulously collected and analyzed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to dissect this enigmatic correlation. We found ourselves knee-deep in numbers, like a mathematician wading through an ocean of equations. The correlation coefficient of 0.9002913 and p < 0.01 from our analysis from 2008 to 2023 had us feeling as giddy as a sailor spotting land after a long voyage.

Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong positive correlation between air pollution levels in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for 'Titanic'. It seems that when the air quality worsened, interest in the doomed ship soared, much like the ship itself on that fateful night. It's as if the residents of Holland, Michigan, sought solace in the tragic romance of Jack and Rose amidst the polluted air, perhaps to remind themselves that even in challenging times, love can still prevail.

In conclusion, our research sheds light on the unexpected relationship between environmental factors and pop culture phenomena. As researchers, we take pride in uncovering these correlations, even if they are as surprising as a kraken emerging from the depths. So, the next time you're in Holland, Michigan and the air feels a bit foggy, remember that the 'Titanic' may be sailing through the search engine seas of Google yet again.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the old saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire," but in the case of our research, where there's air pollution, there's an unexpected surge in Google searches for 'Titanic'. It's a correlation that's as puzzling as trying to find your car keys in the Bermuda Triangle.
Air pollution is a serious issue, with consequences ranging from respiratory problems to environmental degradation. So, when our team stumbled upon the possibility of a connection between air pollution levels in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for the tragic tale of the 'Titanic', we were as shocked as a ship hitting an iceberg in the middle of the night.
The idea that a spike in air pollution could lead to a spike in searches for a cinematic tragedy may seem as unlikely as a penguin becoming a top hat model. However, as researchers, we are duty-bound to investigate even the most seemingly improbable connections, much like a detective tasked with solving a case of mistaken identity.
Our data journey took us through the murky waters of statistical analysis, where we navigated through waves of numbers and charts with the determination of a ship captain steering through a storm. The correlation we discovered between air pollution levels and 'Titanic' searches left us feeling as buoyant as a lifeboat in the North Atlantic Ocean.
But what could possibly drive individuals to seek out information about a tragic shipwreck in response to declining air quality? It's a question as confounding as why the band kept playing as the 'Titanic' sank. Nonetheless, our findings point to a compelling link between environmental distress and a cultural touchstone, reminding us that human curiosity knows no bounds, even when obscured by a fog of pollutants.
In this paper, we present our findings with the hope that it sparks further exploration and discussion. And remember, when you find yourself knee-deep in unexpected correlations, just keep swimming, much like the resilient survivors of the 'Titanic'.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9002913, indicating a robust positive relationship between air pollution levels in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for 'Titanic'. This correlation is as strong as the heart of the ocean necklace, and the relationship it represents is as intriguing as a mysterious underwater treasure.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8105245 suggests that approximately 81% of the variability in 'Titanic' searches can be explained by fluctuations in air pollution levels. It's as if the air pollution and 'Titanic' searches are dancing the waltz of statistical significance, gracefully moving in sync like Jack and Rose on the prow of the ship.

The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance, further reinforcing the strength of the association. This finding is as rare as finding a pearl in an oyster, and as unlikely as a sunken ship reemerging from the depths of the ocean.

In Figure 1, which we'll conveniently place somewhere in this paper, the scatterplot visually illustrates the close relationship between air pollution levels and Google searches for 'Titanic'. The points on the plot are as tightly packed as passengers in a lifeboat, emphasizing the coherence of the data and the clear trend that emerges.

To add sprinkles of scientific humor to our findings, it seems that Holland, Michigan residents turned to the tale of 'Titanic' as a beacon of hope amidst the murky haze of pollution, just as a lighthouse guides ships through rough waters. The connection between environmental factors and pop culture curiosity is as unexpected as finding a treasure map in a bottle washed ashore.

In summary, our research not only unveils a fascinating link between air pollution and popular culture but also serves as a reminder that amidst the turbulence of statistical analysis, there's always room for a little bit of humor. As we navigate through these uncharted waters of data exploration, let's remember that even in the most serious of academic pursuits, there's always an opportunity to crack a dad joke or two.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Holland, Michigan and Google searches for 'Titanic'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Navigating Through The Netherlands: Air Pollution's Impact on Google Searches for 'Titanic'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set sail on the choppy seas of data to investigate the curious connection between air pollution in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for the iconic film 'Titanic'. We embarked on this journey with the determination of a sailor chasing a mermaid and the curiosity of a cat eyeing a canary.

Our research team meticulously collected and analyzed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to dissect this enigmatic correlation. We found ourselves knee-deep in numbers, like a mathematician wading through an ocean of equations. The correlation coefficient of 0.9002913 and p < 0.01 from our analysis from 2008 to 2023 had us feeling as giddy as a sailor spotting land after a long voyage.

Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong positive correlation between air pollution levels in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for 'Titanic'. It seems that when the air quality worsened, interest in the doomed ship soared, much like the ship itself on that fateful night. It's as if the residents of Holland, Michigan, sought solace in the tragic romance of Jack and Rose amidst the polluted air, perhaps to remind themselves that even in challenging times, love can still prevail.

In conclusion, our research sheds light on the unexpected relationship between environmental factors and pop culture phenomena. As researchers, we take pride in uncovering these correlations, even if they are as surprising as a kraken emerging from the depths. So, the next time you're in Holland, Michigan and the air feels a bit foggy, remember that the 'Titanic' may be sailing through the search engine seas of Google yet again.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The curious correlation between air pollution in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for the film 'Titanic' has captured the attention of researchers and academics alike. Smith et al. in "Air Quality and Cultural Interests" investigated the association between environmental factors and public interest in historical events through online search queries. Their study laid the groundwork for exploring the intersection of air pollution and popular culture, paving the way for our current investigation. With the precision of an Olympic archer, they took aim at understanding how environmental conditions may influence societal interests.
Doe and Jones, in "The Impact of Environmental Factors on Media Consumption," delved into the relationship between air quality and media consumption habits. Their findings echoed the sentiment that fluctuations in air pollution levels could elicit shifts in the type of content consumed by the public. However, their work primarily focused on traditional media, leaving a gap in our understanding of how digital search behavior may be affected by environmental variables.
Venturing beyond the realm of academic research, books such as "The Air We Breathe" by Andrea Barrett and "Environmental Pollution: Health and Environmental Quality in Holland, Michigan" by Nigel Bell shed light on the impact of air pollution on human health and well-being. These literary works provide a backdrop for understanding the real-world consequences of environmental degradation, grounding our exploration of the unexpected connection between air quality and cultural fascination.
Turning our attention to fictional works, novels like "Fog Over Frisco" by Dashiell Hammett and "Smoke Gets in Your Eyes" by Caitlin Doughty transport readers into atmospheric settings where environmental elements play a prominent role. While these books may not directly tackle the correlation between air pollution and 'Titanic' searches, they offer a glimpse into the evocative power of environmental conditions in storytelling, reminding us that even the thickest fog can't obscure a good tale.
Pivoting to unconventional sources, our research team deployed an unorthodox approach to gather insights. In a daring departure from standard scholarly practices, we conducted an extensive review of the backs of shampoo bottles, searching for hidden wisdom amidst ingredient lists and usage instructions. While we didn't find any direct references to air pollution and 'Titanic' searches, we did uncover some surprisingly poetic descriptions of ocean-inspired fragrances, serving as a poignant reminder of the enduring allure of maritime narratives.
In the sea of literature surrounding our research topic, our findings stand out as a lighthouse guiding future investigations into the unexpected interplay of environmental conditions and cultural phenomena. As we navigate through the waves of data and scholarly discourse, let us remember that even the most unconventional connections can lead to illuminating discoveries, much like stumbling upon a treasure chest in the unlikeliest of places.


[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9002913, indicating a robust positive relationship between air pollution levels in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for 'Titanic'. This correlation is as strong as the heart of the ocean necklace, and the relationship it represents is as intriguing as a mysterious underwater treasure.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8105245 suggests that approximately 81% of the variability in 'Titanic' searches can be explained by fluctuations in air pollution levels. It's as if the air pollution and 'Titanic' searches are dancing the waltz of statistical significance, gracefully moving in sync like Jack and Rose on the prow of the ship.
The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance, further reinforcing the strength of the association. This finding is as rare as finding a pearl in an oyster, and as unlikely as a sunken ship reemerging from the depths of the ocean.
In Figure 1, which we'll conveniently place somewhere in this paper, the scatterplot visually illustrates the close relationship between air pollution levels and Google searches for 'Titanic'. The points on the plot are as tightly packed as passengers in a lifeboat, emphasizing the coherence of the data and the clear trend that emerges.
To add sprinkles of scientific humor to our findings, it seems that Holland, Michigan residents turned to the tale of 'Titanic' as a beacon of hope amidst the murky haze of pollution, just as a lighthouse guides ships through rough waters. The connection between environmental factors and pop culture curiosity is as unexpected as finding a treasure map in a bottle washed ashore.
In summary, our research not only unveils a fascinating link between air pollution and popular culture but also serves as a reminder that amidst the turbulence of statistical analysis, there's always room for a little bit of humor. As we navigate through these uncharted waters of data exploration, let's remember that even in the most serious of academic pursuits, there's always an opportunity to crack a dad joke or two.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study support and extend the prior research on the curious correlation between air pollution in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for the film 'Titanic'. Building on the work of Smith et al. and Doe and Jones, we have validated and strengthened the evidence for the association between environmental conditions and public interest in cultural phenomena. It's as if our findings have added another layer to the ship's hull, making this correlation as sturdy as a seaworthy vessel navigating through stormy seas.

Our robust correlation coefficient of 0.9002913 aligns with the findings of Smith et al., affirming the strong positive relationship between air pollution levels and 'Titanic' searches. This correlation is more solid than Rose's diamond necklace, highlighting the undeniable link between environmental factors and popular culture. It seems that the residents of Holland, Michigan were drawn to the tragic romance of 'Titanic' like sailors to a siren's song, seeking emotional refuge amidst the murky air, much like sailors finding solace in their sea shanties during rough weather.

Furthermore, our results provide empirical support for the theoretical framework proposed by Doe and Jones, illustrating how fluctuations in air pollution levels can indeed prompt shifts in online search behavior. It's as if our data serves as the compass guiding researchers through uncharted territory, illuminating the impact of environmental variables on digital media consumption. Our findings cement the notion that environmental conditions can act as a hidden tide, subtly influencing the ebb and flow of public interest in cultural phenomena.

The substantial r-squared value of 0.8105245 echoes the sentiments of Smith et al., emphasizing the substantial influence of air pollution levels on 'Titanic' searches. It's as if the air pollution levels and search interest are entwined in an intricate dance, moving fluidly in response to each other, much like the choreographed movements of a ship's crew during a storm. Our results not only reinforce the significant impact of environmental factors on digital search behavior but also provide a compelling narrative of how societal interests can sway like a ship in turbulent waters.

Additionally, the statistically significant p-value further bolsters the validity of our findings, aligning with the conclusions drawn by Smith et al. It's as if the stars have aligned to affirm the unlikely yet undeniable connection between air pollution and the 'Titanic' searches, proving that even the most unexpected correlations can hold true in the vast sea of data. The statistical significance of our results is as rare as a shipwreck turned into a tourist attraction, emphasizing the uniqueness of this relationship amidst the research landscape.

In summary, our study not only contributes to the growing body of literature on the interplay between environmental factors and popular culture but also emphasizes the importance of embracing humor in scholarly pursuits. Just as sailors find mirth in the midst of stormy seas, our research serves as a reminder that even in the serious pursuit of knowledge, there's always room for a well-placed dad joke or two. So, let's keep navigating through these uncharted waters of data analysis with the spirit of adventure and the wit of a seasoned sailor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Holland, Michigan and Google searches for 'Titanic'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Navigating Through The Netherlands: Air Pollution's Impact on Google Searches for 'Titanic'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set sail on the choppy seas of data to investigate the curious connection between air pollution in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for the iconic film 'Titanic'. We embarked on this journey with the determination of a sailor chasing a mermaid and the curiosity of a cat eyeing a canary.

Our research team meticulously collected and analyzed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to dissect this enigmatic correlation. We found ourselves knee-deep in numbers, like a mathematician wading through an ocean of equations. The correlation coefficient of 0.9002913 and p < 0.01 from our analysis from 2008 to 2023 had us feeling as giddy as a sailor spotting land after a long voyage.

Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong positive correlation between air pollution levels in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for 'Titanic'. It seems that when the air quality worsened, interest in the doomed ship soared, much like the ship itself on that fateful night. It's as if the residents of Holland, Michigan, sought solace in the tragic romance of Jack and Rose amidst the polluted air, perhaps to remind themselves that even in challenging times, love can still prevail.

In conclusion, our research sheds light on the unexpected relationship between environmental factors and pop culture phenomena. As researchers, we take pride in uncovering these correlations, even if they are as surprising as a kraken emerging from the depths. So, the next time you're in Holland, Michigan and the air feels a bit foggy, remember that the 'Titanic' may be sailing through the search engine seas of Google yet again.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the old saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire," but in the case of our research, where there's air pollution, there's an unexpected surge in Google searches for 'Titanic'. It's a correlation that's as puzzling as trying to find your car keys in the Bermuda Triangle.
Air pollution is a serious issue, with consequences ranging from respiratory problems to environmental degradation. So, when our team stumbled upon the possibility of a connection between air pollution levels in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for the tragic tale of the 'Titanic', we were as shocked as a ship hitting an iceberg in the middle of the night.
The idea that a spike in air pollution could lead to a spike in searches for a cinematic tragedy may seem as unlikely as a penguin becoming a top hat model. However, as researchers, we are duty-bound to investigate even the most seemingly improbable connections, much like a detective tasked with solving a case of mistaken identity.
Our data journey took us through the murky waters of statistical analysis, where we navigated through waves of numbers and charts with the determination of a ship captain steering through a storm. The correlation we discovered between air pollution levels and 'Titanic' searches left us feeling as buoyant as a lifeboat in the North Atlantic Ocean.
But what could possibly drive individuals to seek out information about a tragic shipwreck in response to declining air quality? It's a question as confounding as why the band kept playing as the 'Titanic' sank. Nonetheless, our findings point to a compelling link between environmental distress and a cultural touchstone, reminding us that human curiosity knows no bounds, even when obscured by a fog of pollutants.
In this paper, we present our findings with the hope that it sparks further exploration and discussion. And remember, when you find yourself knee-deep in unexpected correlations, just keep swimming, much like the resilient survivors of the 'Titanic'.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9002913, indicating a robust positive relationship between air pollution levels in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for 'Titanic'. This correlation is as strong as the heart of the ocean necklace, and the relationship it represents is as intriguing as a mysterious underwater treasure.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8105245 suggests that approximately 81% of the variability in 'Titanic' searches can be explained by fluctuations in air pollution levels. It's as if the air pollution and 'Titanic' searches are dancing the waltz of statistical significance, gracefully moving in sync like Jack and Rose on the prow of the ship.
The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance, further reinforcing the strength of the association. This finding is as rare as finding a pearl in an oyster, and as unlikely as a sunken ship reemerging from the depths of the ocean.
In Figure 1, which we'll conveniently place somewhere in this paper, the scatterplot visually illustrates the close relationship between air pollution levels and Google searches for 'Titanic'. The points on the plot are as tightly packed as passengers in a lifeboat, emphasizing the coherence of the data and the clear trend that emerges.
To add sprinkles of scientific humor to our findings, it seems that Holland, Michigan residents turned to the tale of 'Titanic' as a beacon of hope amidst the murky haze of pollution, just as a lighthouse guides ships through rough waters. The connection between environmental factors and pop culture curiosity is as unexpected as finding a treasure map in a bottle washed ashore.
In summary, our research not only unveils a fascinating link between air pollution and popular culture but also serves as a reminder that amidst the turbulence of statistical analysis, there's always room for a little bit of humor. As we navigate through these uncharted waters of data exploration, let's remember that even in the most serious of academic pursuits, there's always an opportunity to crack a dad joke or two.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has uncovered a captivating correlation between air pollution in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for the cinematic spectacle of the 'Titanic'. It seems that when the air quality plummeted, interest in tragic shipwrecks soared, much like Jack and Rose's hearts as they clung to that fateful piece of driftwood. It's as if the residents of Holland, Michigan sought solace in the tragic romance of 'Titanic', amidst the smog, maybe to remind themselves that even in times of air pollution, love can still bloom – just like a rose in a sooty garden.

As we wrap up this paper like a ship setting sail into the sunset, we want to stress the importance of further exploration in this quirky field. Who knows what other unexpected correlations we might stumble upon? Perhaps we'll find a connection between smog levels and people searching for "Finding Nemo" – after all, they both involve underwater adventures! But for now, let's bask in the glory of this unusual discovery and take comfort in the fact that our research has added a splash of humor to the often-serious world of academic inquiry, much like finding a whimsical seashell on a rocky shore.

As for future research directions, we’d like to advise fellow academics to focus on other unlikely pairs, such as the relationship between cheese consumption and moonwalking enthusiasts – after all, who doesn't love a bit of cheesy Michael Jackson dance moves? But for now, our work here is done. It's safe to say, the air pollution in Holland, Michigan and Google searches for 'Titanic' have been thoroughly analyzed. No need to take a dip in these waters again – we've set sail and found the treasure we were looking for.

In summary, the connection between air pollution and cultural fascination is as intriguing as a shipwreck waiting to be discovered. Our findings may have surfaced like the tale of the 'Titanic' itself, but for now, we can rest easy and enjoy the fact that amidst the serious pursuit of knowledge, there's always room for a few puns and the occasional dad joke. And remember, if you ever find yourself lost in a sea of unexpected correlations, just keep swimming – you never know what treasure awaits.

No more research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Navigating Through The Netherlands: Air Pollution's Impact on Google Searches for 'Titanic'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Atmospheric and Cultural Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Navigating Through The Netherlands: Air Pollution's Impact on Google Searches for 'Titanic'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Environmental Studies (SQES)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Navigating Through The Netherlands: Air Pollution's Impact on Google Searches for 'Titanic' with an abstract of In this study, we set sail on the choppy seas of data to investigate the curious connection between air pollution in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for the iconic film 'Titanic'. We embarked on this journey with the determination of a sailor chasing a mermaid and the curiosity of a cat eyeing a canary.
Our research team meticulously collected and analyzed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to dissect this enigmatic correlation. We found ourselves knee-deep in numbers, like a mathematician wading through an ocean of equations. The correlation coefficient of 0.9002913 and p < 0.01 from our analysis from 2008 to 2023 had us feeling as giddy as a sailor spotting land after a long voyage.
Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong positive correlation between air pollution levels in Holland, Michigan, and Google searches for 'Titanic'. It seems that when the air quality worsened, interest in the doomed ship soared, much like the ship itself on that fateful night. It's as if the residents of Holland, Michigan, sought solace in the tragic romance of Jack and Rose amidst the polluted air, perhaps to remind themselves that even in challenging times, love can still prevail.
In conclusion, our research sheds light on the unexpected relationship between environmental factors and pop culture phenomena. As researchers, we take pride in uncovering these correlations, even if they are as surprising as a kraken emerging from the depths. So, the next time you're in Holland, Michigan and the air feels a bit foggy, remember that the 'Titanic' may be sailing through the search engine seas of Google yet again.

ChatGPT:

Netherlands, air pollution, Google searches, Titanic, correlation, Holland Michigan, environmental factors, Google Trends, research, air quality, pop culture phenomena, data analysis, relationship, sea pollution, maritime history, romantic movies

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Holland, Michigan
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Holland, MI
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Holland, Michigan

Google searches for 'Titanic'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'Titanic' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'Titanic'

Correlation r = 0.9002913 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8105245 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'Titanic') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Holland, Michigan) over the 16 years from 2008 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.01E-6. 0.0000020112274047668330000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 0.000201% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 497,209 random variables You don't actually need 497 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.73, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Air pollution in Holland, Michigan (Bad air quality days)0.004149380.0041152300.01239670.04583330.004166670.0041666700000000.005813950.0165746
Google searches for 'Titanic' (Rel. search volume)12.513.514.083314.66672414.2512.666712.166712.7512.511.916711.25119.916679.9166719.6667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.00414938,0.00411523,0,0.0123967,0.0458333,0.00416667,0.00416667,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.00581395,0.0165746,])
array_2 = np.array([12.5,13.5,14.0833,14.6667,24,14.25,12.6667,12.1667,12.75,12.5,11.9167,11.25,11,9.91667,9.91667,19.6667,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Holland, Michigan"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'Titanic'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 5487 · Black Variable ID: 22314 · Red Variable ID: 1419
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0