about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,478 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air quality in Pittsburgh and the second variable is Hydopower energy generated in Greenland.  The chart goes from 1999 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air quality in Pittsburgh improved, it created a ripple effect of positivity around the world. This newfound pristine air quality somehow led to a surge in butterfly populations in Greenland. As the butterflies flapped their delicate wings with pure, Pittsburgh-fresh air, they unknowingly created tiny butterfly hurricanes, which in turn boosted the efficiency of hydropower turbines in Greenland. Who knew that the path to cleaner energy was through the magical butterfly effect of Pittsburgh air quality!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Cybernetic art ] As the sun bathes the landscape in its warm glow, a futuristic cityscape emerges in the foreground, characterized by towering skyscrapers with gleaming glass facades and an intricate network of neon-lit pathways. In the background, the clear skies of Pittsburgh are juxtaposed against the breathtaking natural beauty of Greenland, where majestic waterfalls cascade down rugged cliffs, and colossal turbines form a modern marvel of renewable energy generation. Graceful butterflies with iridescent wings flutter among the scene, their delicate movements juxtaposed against the towering structures and hum of the turbines, creating a harmonious fusion of nature and technology. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air quality in Pittsburgh and Hydopower energy generated in Greenland. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Glitch art Realistic Symbolism inspired by bauhaus Cybernetic art
ChatGPT: Cybernetic art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air quality in Pittsburgh and Hydopower energy generated in Greenland, in the following situation: As the air quality in Pittsburgh improved, it created a ripple effect of positivity around the world. This newfound pristine air quality somehow led to a surge in butterfly populations in Greenland. As the butterflies flapped their delicate wings with pure, Pittsburgh-fresh air, they unknowingly created tiny butterfly hurricanes, which in turn boosted the efficiency of hydropower turbines in Greenland. Who knew that the path to cleaner energy was through the magical butterfly effect of Pittsburgh air quality!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the clear skies of Pittsburgh, the air shimmered with freshness as greenery thrived and butterflies danced. Across the ocean, in Greenland, the sight of breathtaking waterfalls and turbines hummed with newfound energy. Amidst it all, delicate butterflies with glistening wings fluttered freely, creating tiny whirlwinds that danced in perfect harmony with the powerful turbines, enhancing the generation of clean hydropower.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cybernetic art ] and depicting this scene: In the clear skies of Pittsburgh, the air shimmered with freshness as greenery thrived and butterflies danced. Across the ocean, in Greenland, the sight of breathtaking waterfalls and turbines hummed with newfound energy. Amidst it all, delicate butterflies with glistening wings fluttered freely, creating tiny whirlwinds that danced in perfect harmony with the powerful turbines, enhancing the generation of clean hydropower. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Cybernetic art ] As the sun bathes the landscape in its warm glow, a futuristic cityscape emerges in the foreground, characterized by towering skyscrapers with gleaming glass facades and an intricate network of neon-lit pathways. In the background, the clear skies of Pittsburgh are juxtaposed against the breathtaking natural beauty of Greenland, where majestic waterfalls cascade down rugged cliffs, and colossal turbines form a modern marvel of renewable energy generation. Graceful butterflies with iridescent wings flutter among the scene, their delicate movements juxtaposed against the towering structures and hum of the turbines, creating a harmonious fusion of nature and technology.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air quality in Pittsburgh caused Hydopower energy generated in Greenland to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Clearing the Air: A Breath of Fresh Data in the Relationship between Air Quality in Pittsburgh and Hydropower Energy Generated in Greenland

The Journal of Eco-Atmospheric Dynamics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Pittsburgh and Hydopower energy generated in Greenland. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9250724 and p < 0.01 for 1999 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: A Breath of Fresh Data in the Relationship between Air Quality in Pittsburgh and Hydropower Energy Generated in Greenland"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between air quality in Pittsburgh and the amount of hydropower energy generated in Greenland, using comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. A statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9250724 and p < 0.01 was observed for the time period spanning from 1999 to 2021.

Our findings suggest a strong, positive relationship between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland. It appears that as air quality in Pittsburgh improves, the amount of hydropower energy generated in Greenland increases. This novel connection leads to the conclusion that a breath of fresh air in Pittsburgh may indeed create a wave of energy in Greenland. Our results prompt further exploration into the mechanisms underlying this unexpected connection, as well as the potential for leveraging air quality improvements to enhance sustainable energy production. Overall, this research sheds light on an unexpected link between distant environmental factors and highlights the importance of considering global interdependencies in environmental and energy policy.

And remember, if you're feeling deflated, just remember that even air quality data can pump you up with excitement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Pittsburgh and Hydopower energy generated in Greenland. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: A Breath of Fresh Data in the Relationship between Air Quality in Pittsburgh and Hydropower Energy Generated in Greenland"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between air quality in Pittsburgh and the amount of hydropower energy generated in Greenland, using comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. A statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9250724 and p < 0.01 was observed for the time period spanning from 1999 to 2021.

Our findings suggest a strong, positive relationship between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland. It appears that as air quality in Pittsburgh improves, the amount of hydropower energy generated in Greenland increases. This novel connection leads to the conclusion that a breath of fresh air in Pittsburgh may indeed create a wave of energy in Greenland. Our results prompt further exploration into the mechanisms underlying this unexpected connection, as well as the potential for leveraging air quality improvements to enhance sustainable energy production. Overall, this research sheds light on an unexpected link between distant environmental factors and highlights the importance of considering global interdependencies in environmental and energy policy.

And remember, if you're feeling deflated, just remember that even air quality data can pump you up with excitement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Globally, the push for sustainable energy sources has risen like a tide, and hydropower has flowed to the forefront of the conversation. Meanwhile, concerns about air quality in urban centers have hung in the atmosphere like a particularly pesky smog. Our research aims to unravel the relationship between these seemingly disparate factors – air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland.

But first, let’s take a deep breath and dive into the research. Speaking of air quality, did you hear about the atmospheric scientist who fell in love with a meteorologist? He thought she was just his type.

The allure of hydropower lies in its cleanliness, renewable nature, and potential as a stable energy source. Conversely, the quality of air in urban areas like Pittsburgh has implications for public health and environmental sustainability. As we embark upon this research, the question arises: can improvements in air quality in Pittsburgh have a tangible impact on hydropower energy generation in Greenland?

Just like a well-timed dad joke, the connection between these two factors may seem unexpected at first, but upon closer examination, it could hold significant implications for environmental and energy policy. Our analysis aims to provide clarity on this relationship, serving as a breath of fresh air in the dialogue on sustainable energy and air quality. After all, when it comes to environmental research, sometimes the best solutions are the ones that are right under our nose.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Pittsburgh and Hydopower energy generated in Greenland. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: A Breath of Fresh Data in the Relationship between Air Quality in Pittsburgh and Hydropower Energy Generated in Greenland"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between air quality in Pittsburgh and the amount of hydropower energy generated in Greenland, using comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. A statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9250724 and p < 0.01 was observed for the time period spanning from 1999 to 2021.

Our findings suggest a strong, positive relationship between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland. It appears that as air quality in Pittsburgh improves, the amount of hydropower energy generated in Greenland increases. This novel connection leads to the conclusion that a breath of fresh air in Pittsburgh may indeed create a wave of energy in Greenland. Our results prompt further exploration into the mechanisms underlying this unexpected connection, as well as the potential for leveraging air quality improvements to enhance sustainable energy production. Overall, this research sheds light on an unexpected link between distant environmental factors and highlights the importance of considering global interdependencies in environmental and energy policy.

And remember, if you're feeling deflated, just remember that even air quality data can pump you up with excitement.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Globally, the push for sustainable energy sources has risen like a tide, and hydropower has flowed to the forefront of the conversation. Meanwhile, concerns about air quality in urban centers have hung in the atmosphere like a particularly pesky smog. Our research aims to unravel the relationship between these seemingly disparate factors – air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland.
But first, let’s take a deep breath and dive into the research. Speaking of air quality, did you hear about the atmospheric scientist who fell in love with a meteorologist? He thought she was just his type.
The allure of hydropower lies in its cleanliness, renewable nature, and potential as a stable energy source. Conversely, the quality of air in urban areas like Pittsburgh has implications for public health and environmental sustainability. As we embark upon this research, the question arises: can improvements in air quality in Pittsburgh have a tangible impact on hydropower energy generation in Greenland?
Just like a well-timed dad joke, the connection between these two factors may seem unexpected at first, but upon closer examination, it could hold significant implications for environmental and energy policy. Our analysis aims to provide clarity on this relationship, serving as a breath of fresh air in the dialogue on sustainable energy and air quality. After all, when it comes to environmental research, sometimes the best solutions are the ones that are right under our nose.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find a positive correlation between air quality and energy production, suggesting that improvements in air quality may be associated with an increase in energy generation. Similarly, "Doe and Jones" report a significant relationship between environmental factors and energy production in their analysis of global energy trends. These studies provide a solid foundation upon which to build our investigation into the potential connection between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland.

Now, let's turn to some relevant non-fiction books for further insights, such as "The Big Necessity" by Rose George, which delves into the critical importance of sanitation and its impact on environmental and public health. In addition, "The Quest" by Daniel Yergin offers a comprehensive examination of the global energy landscape, including the potential influence of environmental factors on energy production.

On a lighter note, one might also consider the fictional works of Jules Verne, such as "Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea" and "Journey to the Center of the Earth," which, while not directly related to the topic at hand, juxtapose the themes of energy and environmental exploration in an imaginative light. Additionally, the classic novel "The Call of the Wild" by Jack London may inspire reflections on the untamed power of natural forces and their potential to shape human endeavors.

In the spirit of exploring unexpected connections, one cannot overlook certain television shows that may offer indirect insights into the interplay between environmental factors and energy generation. For instance, the series "Extreme Engineering" and "Mysteries of the Abandoned" provide intriguing glimpses into the intersection of human innovation and environmental conditions, offering a tangential yet thought-provoking perspective for our research.

And speaking of unexpected connections, did you hear about the power plant that was attacked by a wind turbine? It got a little "huff" around the edges, but it's "aerodynamic" now!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Pittsburgh and Hydopower energy generated in Greenland. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1999 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: A Breath of Fresh Data in the Relationship between Air Quality in Pittsburgh and Hydropower Energy Generated in Greenland"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between air quality in Pittsburgh and the amount of hydropower energy generated in Greenland, using comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. A statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9250724 and p < 0.01 was observed for the time period spanning from 1999 to 2021.

Our findings suggest a strong, positive relationship between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland. It appears that as air quality in Pittsburgh improves, the amount of hydropower energy generated in Greenland increases. This novel connection leads to the conclusion that a breath of fresh air in Pittsburgh may indeed create a wave of energy in Greenland. Our results prompt further exploration into the mechanisms underlying this unexpected connection, as well as the potential for leveraging air quality improvements to enhance sustainable energy production. Overall, this research sheds light on an unexpected link between distant environmental factors and highlights the importance of considering global interdependencies in environmental and energy policy.

And remember, if you're feeling deflated, just remember that even air quality data can pump you up with excitement.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Globally, the push for sustainable energy sources has risen like a tide, and hydropower has flowed to the forefront of the conversation. Meanwhile, concerns about air quality in urban centers have hung in the atmosphere like a particularly pesky smog. Our research aims to unravel the relationship between these seemingly disparate factors – air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland.
But first, let’s take a deep breath and dive into the research. Speaking of air quality, did you hear about the atmospheric scientist who fell in love with a meteorologist? He thought she was just his type.
The allure of hydropower lies in its cleanliness, renewable nature, and potential as a stable energy source. Conversely, the quality of air in urban areas like Pittsburgh has implications for public health and environmental sustainability. As we embark upon this research, the question arises: can improvements in air quality in Pittsburgh have a tangible impact on hydropower energy generation in Greenland?
Just like a well-timed dad joke, the connection between these two factors may seem unexpected at first, but upon closer examination, it could hold significant implications for environmental and energy policy. Our analysis aims to provide clarity on this relationship, serving as a breath of fresh air in the dialogue on sustainable energy and air quality. After all, when it comes to environmental research, sometimes the best solutions are the ones that are right under our nose.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this study included collecting comprehensive data from various credible sources, including the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA). Data spanning from 1999 to 2021 was utilized, encompassing a period of significant developments in environmental monitoring and energy production. The data from these sources was scrubbed and filtered with the rigor of someone scrubbing off the grime from an old hydroelectric dam.

To assess the air quality in Pittsburgh, data on key air pollutants such as particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), and ozone (O3) levels were obtained. This data was then analyzed to derive composite air quality indices, providing a comprehensive measure of the overall air quality in Pittsburgh.

As for the hydropower energy generated in Greenland, the methodology involved analyzing the total electricity generation from hydropower sources in Greenland over the specified time period. This data was then normalized to account for any changes in energy production capacity and to provide a consistent measure of hydropower energy generated. This process was as meticulous as ensuring a steady flow of water through the turbines.

In addition to the primary data collection and analysis, advanced statistical methods such as correlation analysis and regression modeling were employed to uncover the relationship between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland. This allowed for the estimation of the strength and direction of the association, while controlling for potential confounding variables. The statistical analysis was performed with the precision of a well-calibrated hydrometer, ensuring accurate and reliable results.

The selection of this methodology was driven by the need to rigorously investigate the relationship between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland, while accounting for potential variability and covariates. This allowed for a comprehensive and robust analysis of the unexpected connection between these two seemingly disparate factors, providing valuable insights into the potential interdependencies in environmental and energy dynamics. It is important to note that, much like the water cycle, the research process involved an iterative and integrated approach, ensuring thoroughness and reliability in the findings.

In conclusion, the application of this methodology enabled a systematic and in-depth exploration of the relationship between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland, shedding light on a previously uncharted correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Pittsburgh and Hydopower energy generated in Greenland. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1999 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9250724, r-squared of 0.8557590, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: A Breath of Fresh Data in the Relationship between Air Quality in Pittsburgh and Hydropower Energy Generated in Greenland"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between air quality in Pittsburgh and the amount of hydropower energy generated in Greenland, using comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. A statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9250724 and p < 0.01 was observed for the time period spanning from 1999 to 2021.

Our findings suggest a strong, positive relationship between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland. It appears that as air quality in Pittsburgh improves, the amount of hydropower energy generated in Greenland increases. This novel connection leads to the conclusion that a breath of fresh air in Pittsburgh may indeed create a wave of energy in Greenland. Our results prompt further exploration into the mechanisms underlying this unexpected connection, as well as the potential for leveraging air quality improvements to enhance sustainable energy production. Overall, this research sheds light on an unexpected link between distant environmental factors and highlights the importance of considering global interdependencies in environmental and energy policy.

And remember, if you're feeling deflated, just remember that even air quality data can pump you up with excitement.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Globally, the push for sustainable energy sources has risen like a tide, and hydropower has flowed to the forefront of the conversation. Meanwhile, concerns about air quality in urban centers have hung in the atmosphere like a particularly pesky smog. Our research aims to unravel the relationship between these seemingly disparate factors – air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland.
But first, let’s take a deep breath and dive into the research. Speaking of air quality, did you hear about the atmospheric scientist who fell in love with a meteorologist? He thought she was just his type.
The allure of hydropower lies in its cleanliness, renewable nature, and potential as a stable energy source. Conversely, the quality of air in urban areas like Pittsburgh has implications for public health and environmental sustainability. As we embark upon this research, the question arises: can improvements in air quality in Pittsburgh have a tangible impact on hydropower energy generation in Greenland?
Just like a well-timed dad joke, the connection between these two factors may seem unexpected at first, but upon closer examination, it could hold significant implications for environmental and energy policy. Our analysis aims to provide clarity on this relationship, serving as a breath of fresh air in the dialogue on sustainable energy and air quality. After all, when it comes to environmental research, sometimes the best solutions are the ones that are right under our nose.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland for the period from 1999 to 2021. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.9250724, indicating a robust linear relationship between the two variables. This suggests that as air quality in Pittsburgh improved, there was a corresponding increase in the amount of hydropower energy generated in Greenland. It seems that cleaner air in Pittsburgh might just be the gust of wind needed to power the turbines in Greenland.

The coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.8557590, indicating that approximately 85.6% of the variability in the amount of hydropower energy generated in Greenland could be explained by the changes in air quality in Pittsburgh. This finding provides strong evidence in support of the significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors.

Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforces the statistical significance of the observed correlation. This indicates that the likelihood of the observed relationship occurring by chance is less than 1%, providing compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis. It looks like the connection between air quality and hydropower is as solid as a rock – or should we say, as solid as an ice sheet in Greenland.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually represents the strong positive correlation between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland. Each data point seems to be saying, "Let's stick together like glue-cose".

In conclusion, our findings unveil an unexpected yet compelling relationship between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland, suggesting that improvements in urban air quality may indeed have a ripple effect on sustainable energy production in distant regions. This discovery not only calls for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms but also highlights the potential for leveraging air quality improvements as a means to bolster sustainable energy generation. So, the next time you take a deep breath, remember that it could be contributing to renewable energy production in far-off lands. This research not only breathes new life into the conversation on environmental and energy policy but also provides a breath of fresh air in demonstrating the interconnectedness of global environmental factors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Pittsburgh and Hydopower energy generated in Greenland. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: A Breath of Fresh Data in the Relationship between Air Quality in Pittsburgh and Hydropower Energy Generated in Greenland"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between air quality in Pittsburgh and the amount of hydropower energy generated in Greenland, using comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. A statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9250724 and p < 0.01 was observed for the time period spanning from 1999 to 2021.

Our findings suggest a strong, positive relationship between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland. It appears that as air quality in Pittsburgh improves, the amount of hydropower energy generated in Greenland increases. This novel connection leads to the conclusion that a breath of fresh air in Pittsburgh may indeed create a wave of energy in Greenland. Our results prompt further exploration into the mechanisms underlying this unexpected connection, as well as the potential for leveraging air quality improvements to enhance sustainable energy production. Overall, this research sheds light on an unexpected link between distant environmental factors and highlights the importance of considering global interdependencies in environmental and energy policy.

And remember, if you're feeling deflated, just remember that even air quality data can pump you up with excitement.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find a positive correlation between air quality and energy production, suggesting that improvements in air quality may be associated with an increase in energy generation. Similarly, "Doe and Jones" report a significant relationship between environmental factors and energy production in their analysis of global energy trends. These studies provide a solid foundation upon which to build our investigation into the potential connection between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland.
Now, let's turn to some relevant non-fiction books for further insights, such as "The Big Necessity" by Rose George, which delves into the critical importance of sanitation and its impact on environmental and public health. In addition, "The Quest" by Daniel Yergin offers a comprehensive examination of the global energy landscape, including the potential influence of environmental factors on energy production.
On a lighter note, one might also consider the fictional works of Jules Verne, such as "Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea" and "Journey to the Center of the Earth," which, while not directly related to the topic at hand, juxtapose the themes of energy and environmental exploration in an imaginative light. Additionally, the classic novel "The Call of the Wild" by Jack London may inspire reflections on the untamed power of natural forces and their potential to shape human endeavors.
In the spirit of exploring unexpected connections, one cannot overlook certain television shows that may offer indirect insights into the interplay between environmental factors and energy generation. For instance, the series "Extreme Engineering" and "Mysteries of the Abandoned" provide intriguing glimpses into the intersection of human innovation and environmental conditions, offering a tangential yet thought-provoking perspective for our research.
And speaking of unexpected connections, did you hear about the power plant that was attacked by a wind turbine? It got a little "huff" around the edges, but it's "aerodynamic" now!

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland for the period from 1999 to 2021. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.9250724, indicating a robust linear relationship between the two variables. This suggests that as air quality in Pittsburgh improved, there was a corresponding increase in the amount of hydropower energy generated in Greenland. It seems that cleaner air in Pittsburgh might just be the gust of wind needed to power the turbines in Greenland.
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.8557590, indicating that approximately 85.6% of the variability in the amount of hydropower energy generated in Greenland could be explained by the changes in air quality in Pittsburgh. This finding provides strong evidence in support of the significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors.
Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforces the statistical significance of the observed correlation. This indicates that the likelihood of the observed relationship occurring by chance is less than 1%, providing compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis. It looks like the connection between air quality and hydropower is as solid as a rock – or should we say, as solid as an ice sheet in Greenland.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually represents the strong positive correlation between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland. Each data point seems to be saying, "Let's stick together like glue-cose".
In conclusion, our findings unveil an unexpected yet compelling relationship between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland, suggesting that improvements in urban air quality may indeed have a ripple effect on sustainable energy production in distant regions. This discovery not only calls for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms but also highlights the potential for leveraging air quality improvements as a means to bolster sustainable energy generation. So, the next time you take a deep breath, remember that it could be contributing to renewable energy production in far-off lands. This research not only breathes new life into the conversation on environmental and energy policy but also provides a breath of fresh air in demonstrating the interconnectedness of global environmental factors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of the present study have provided robust support for the previously suggested link between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland. The strong positive correlation observed aligns with prior research by Smith et al. and Doe and Jones, who also reported a significant relationship between air quality and energy production. The findings presented in this paper not only affirm but also extend the existing literature, emphasizing the tangible influence of urban air quality improvements on sustainable energy generation in remote regions.

This unexpected connection between seemingly disparate geographical and environmental factors underscores the intricate interdependencies within the global ecosystem. As Rose George elucidates in "The Big Necessity," environmental conditions, such as air quality, have far-reaching implications for public health and ecological sustainability. The present study adds a novel dimension to this discourse, revealing the potential for air quality improvements in urban areas to reverberate across continents, energizing distant hydropower facilities.

Furthermore, the statistical significance of the correlation coefficient (0.9250724) and the p-value of less than 0.01 emphasize the robustness of the relationship between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland. This statistical evidence bolsters the previous findings of "Doe and Jones," cementing the credibility of the observed association. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8557590 further underscores the substantial proportion of variability in hydropower energy generation that can be explained by changes in air quality, strengthening the case for the influence of urban air quality on renewable energy production in Greenland.

In parallel with the unexpected connections highlighted in "Jules Verne's" imaginative works, the present study has illuminated an unlikely, yet substantiated, association between urban air quality and renewable energy generation in a remote, polar locale. This finding encourages a reevaluation of the scope and impact of urban environmental interventions, echoing the unconventional perspectives portrayed in Verne's literary explorations of energy and natural environments.

As for the tangential insights from television series "Extreme Engineering" and "Mysteries of the Abandoned," the current research has unveiled an enigmatic link between environmental factors and energy production, juxtaposing the innovative spirit of human endeavors with the subtle influences of air quality on sustainable energy generation. While the unexpected connections depicted in these shows may entertain viewers, our findings emphasize that reality can be just as intriguing, revealing profound implications for global energy dynamics rooted in local environmental improvements.

And finally, to add a light-hearted note, this study has shown that the atmospheric transformations from Pittsburgh may indeed set the turbines in Greenland spinning, underscoring the profound yet whimsical nature of global environmental interrelations. It appears that the next time Pittsburgh breathes in a breath of fresh air, it could be exhaling renewable energy potential in far-off lands, illuminating the grandeur and intricacy of interconnected environmental systems.

Before we conclude, did you hear about the Pittsburgh air quality monitor that went on strike? It demanded to be given "breathe-ing" room!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Pittsburgh and Hydopower energy generated in Greenland. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: A Breath of Fresh Data in the Relationship between Air Quality in Pittsburgh and Hydropower Energy Generated in Greenland"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between air quality in Pittsburgh and the amount of hydropower energy generated in Greenland, using comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. A statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9250724 and p < 0.01 was observed for the time period spanning from 1999 to 2021.

Our findings suggest a strong, positive relationship between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland. It appears that as air quality in Pittsburgh improves, the amount of hydropower energy generated in Greenland increases. This novel connection leads to the conclusion that a breath of fresh air in Pittsburgh may indeed create a wave of energy in Greenland. Our results prompt further exploration into the mechanisms underlying this unexpected connection, as well as the potential for leveraging air quality improvements to enhance sustainable energy production. Overall, this research sheds light on an unexpected link between distant environmental factors and highlights the importance of considering global interdependencies in environmental and energy policy.

And remember, if you're feeling deflated, just remember that even air quality data can pump you up with excitement.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Globally, the push for sustainable energy sources has risen like a tide, and hydropower has flowed to the forefront of the conversation. Meanwhile, concerns about air quality in urban centers have hung in the atmosphere like a particularly pesky smog. Our research aims to unravel the relationship between these seemingly disparate factors – air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland.
But first, let’s take a deep breath and dive into the research. Speaking of air quality, did you hear about the atmospheric scientist who fell in love with a meteorologist? He thought she was just his type.
The allure of hydropower lies in its cleanliness, renewable nature, and potential as a stable energy source. Conversely, the quality of air in urban areas like Pittsburgh has implications for public health and environmental sustainability. As we embark upon this research, the question arises: can improvements in air quality in Pittsburgh have a tangible impact on hydropower energy generation in Greenland?
Just like a well-timed dad joke, the connection between these two factors may seem unexpected at first, but upon closer examination, it could hold significant implications for environmental and energy policy. Our analysis aims to provide clarity on this relationship, serving as a breath of fresh air in the dialogue on sustainable energy and air quality. After all, when it comes to environmental research, sometimes the best solutions are the ones that are right under our nose.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland for the period from 1999 to 2021. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.9250724, indicating a robust linear relationship between the two variables. This suggests that as air quality in Pittsburgh improved, there was a corresponding increase in the amount of hydropower energy generated in Greenland. It seems that cleaner air in Pittsburgh might just be the gust of wind needed to power the turbines in Greenland.
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.8557590, indicating that approximately 85.6% of the variability in the amount of hydropower energy generated in Greenland could be explained by the changes in air quality in Pittsburgh. This finding provides strong evidence in support of the significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors.
Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforces the statistical significance of the observed correlation. This indicates that the likelihood of the observed relationship occurring by chance is less than 1%, providing compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis. It looks like the connection between air quality and hydropower is as solid as a rock – or should we say, as solid as an ice sheet in Greenland.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually represents the strong positive correlation between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland. Each data point seems to be saying, "Let's stick together like glue-cose".
In conclusion, our findings unveil an unexpected yet compelling relationship between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland, suggesting that improvements in urban air quality may indeed have a ripple effect on sustainable energy production in distant regions. This discovery not only calls for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms but also highlights the potential for leveraging air quality improvements as a means to bolster sustainable energy generation. So, the next time you take a deep breath, remember that it could be contributing to renewable energy production in far-off lands. This research not only breathes new life into the conversation on environmental and energy policy but also provides a breath of fresh air in demonstrating the interconnectedness of global environmental factors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In summary, our research has unearthed a remarkable and robust relationship between air quality in Pittsburgh and the amount of hydropower energy generated in Greenland. The findings indicate that as the air quality in Pittsburgh improves, there is a correlated increase in hydropower energy production in Greenland. It appears that cleaner air in Pittsburgh is not just a breath of fresh air for locals, but also a gust of wind powering the turbines in Greenland. This unexpected connection between seemingly distant environmental factors underscores the intricate interplay of global systems. It seems that a breath of fresh air in one location truly can create a wave of energy in another – talk about a breezy solution to sustainable energy production!

This research sheds light on the importance of considering interconnected environmental factors in shaping effective policy and strategic decision-making. Just as we often overlook the power of a well-crafted dad joke, the link between air quality and hydropower energy generation emerged as an unexpected yet significant revelation, prompting further exploration into the underlying mechanisms. As the saying goes, "the best air quality puns are the ones that are right under our nose."

As such, we assert that no further research in this area is needed, as this study has truly blown away the winds of uncertainty and settled the air on the connection between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland. It is clear that this relationship warrants consideration in shaping global environmental and energy policies, leaving us with the undeniable conclusion that a breath of fresh air can indeed set the wheels of sustainable energy production in motion.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Clearing the Air: A Breath of Fresh Data in the Relationship between Air Quality in Pittsburgh and Hydropower Energy Generated in Greenland. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Eco-Atmospheric Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Clearing the Air: A Breath of Fresh Data in the Relationship between Air Quality in Pittsburgh and Hydropower Energy Generated in Greenland. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Consortium for Climate Collaboration and Conservation (IC4)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Clearing the Air: A Breath of Fresh Data in the Relationship between Air Quality in Pittsburgh and Hydropower Energy Generated in Greenland with an abstract of The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between air quality in Pittsburgh and the amount of hydropower energy generated in Greenland, using comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. A statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9250724 and p < 0.01 was observed for the time period spanning from 1999 to 2021.
Our findings suggest a strong, positive relationship between air quality in Pittsburgh and hydropower energy generated in Greenland. It appears that as air quality in Pittsburgh improves, the amount of hydropower energy generated in Greenland increases. This novel connection leads to the conclusion that a breath of fresh air in Pittsburgh may indeed create a wave of energy in Greenland. Our results prompt further exploration into the mechanisms underlying this unexpected connection, as well as the potential for leveraging air quality improvements to enhance sustainable energy production. Overall, this research sheds light on an unexpected link between distant environmental factors and highlights the importance of considering global interdependencies in environmental and energy policy.
And remember, if you're feeling deflated, just remember that even air quality data can pump you up with excitement.

ChatGPT:

air quality, Pittsburgh, hydropower energy, Greenland, correlation analysis, Environmental Protection Agency, Energy Information Administration, sustainable energy production, global interdependencies, environmental policy, energy policy

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air quality in Pittsburgh
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with good or moderate air quality in Pittsburgh, PA
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in Pittsburgh

Hydopower energy generated in Greenland
Detailed data title: Total hydopower energy generated in Greenland in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Hydopower energy generated in Greenland

Correlation r = 0.9250724 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8557590 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hydopower energy generated in Greenland) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air quality in Pittsburgh) over the 23 years from 1999 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.7E-10. 0.0000000002733918534174800500
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 2.7E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,657,753,468 random variables You don't actually need 3 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.83, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air quality in Pittsburgh (Good air quality)75.890482.786974.794578.630182.465882.240476.712380.2748083.606690.13783.287787.123387.158595.068596.712392.876792.349794.794595.890496.712396.721397.5342
Hydopower energy generated in Greenland (Billion kWh)0.1710.1710.1580.1820.180.1920.2030.1960.2040.2020.2650.2930.3350.3420.3740.3920.4190.3970.3840.413820.40.50.5




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([75.8904,82.7869,74.7945,78.6301,82.4658,82.2404,76.7123,80.274,80,83.6066,90.137,83.2877,87.1233,87.1585,95.0685,96.7123,92.8767,92.3497,94.7945,95.8904,96.7123,96.7213,97.5342,])
array_2 = np.array([0.171,0.171,0.158,0.182,0.18,0.192,0.203,0.196,0.204,0.202,0.265,0.293,0.335,0.342,0.374,0.392,0.419,0.397,0.384,0.41382,0.4,0.5,0.5,])
array_1_name = "Air quality in Pittsburgh"
array_2_name = "Hydopower energy generated in Greenland"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 5478 · Black Variable ID: 21068 · Red Variable ID: 23699
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0