about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,449 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Jamaal and the second variable is Air pollution in Provo, Utah.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the popularity of the name Jamaal waned, so did the trend of gifting personalized novelty license plates. This led to a decrease in production and a shift in consumption of car accessories, ultimately lowering the overall vehicle emissions in Provo. It seems that when it comes to air quality, Jamaal just couldn't handle the pressure of being a smog name celebrity.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Concept art ] Create a serene, picturesque scene of Provo, Utah with a focus on the skyline. Depict the cityscape with a noticeable transformation from a smog-covered environment to a clear, pollution-free atmosphere. Show the reduction in vehicle emissions by illustrating the absence of smog, with clear blue skies and cleaner air. Include a few vehicles with personalized novelty license plates, showcasing the decline in the popularity of the name "Jamaal" through imagery. Capture the correlation between the name's popularity and the improved air quality in a visually compelling way. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Jamaal and Air pollution in Provo, Utah. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Concept art Minimalism Minimalism a meme Concept art
ChatGPT: Concept art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Jamaal and Air pollution in Provo, Utah, in the following situation: As the popularity of the name Jamaal waned, so did the trend of gifting personalized novelty license plates. This led to a decrease in production and a shift in consumption of car accessories, ultimately lowering the overall vehicle emissions in Provo. It seems that when it comes to air quality, Jamaal just couldn't handle the pressure of being a smog name celebrity.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Provo, Utah, the popularity of the name Jamaal waned as fewer personalized novelty license plates adorned vehicles. As a result, the decrease in production and consumption of car accessories led to a decline in vehicle emissions, visibly clearing the air over the city. The correlation between Jamaal's popularity and air pollution became apparent as the once smog-covered skyline now boasted a clearer, healthier atmosphere.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Concept art ] and depicting this scene: In Provo, Utah, the popularity of the name Jamaal waned as fewer personalized novelty license plates adorned vehicles. As a result, the decrease in production and consumption of car accessories led to a decline in vehicle emissions, visibly clearing the air over the city. The correlation between Jamaal's popularity and air pollution became apparent as the once smog-covered skyline now boasted a clearer, healthier atmosphere. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Concept art ] Create a serene, picturesque scene of Provo, Utah with a focus on the skyline. Depict the cityscape with a noticeable transformation from a smog-covered environment to a clear, pollution-free atmosphere. Show the reduction in vehicle emissions by illustrating the absence of smog, with clear blue skies and cleaner air. Include a few vehicles with personalized novelty license plates, showcasing the decline in the popularity of the name "Jamaal" through imagery. Capture the correlation between the name's popularity and the improved air quality in a visually compelling way.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Jamaal caused Air pollution in Provo, Utah to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Jamaal Effect: A Breath of Fresh Air or a Smoggy Situation?

Journal of Environmental Psychology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jamaal and Air pollution in Provo, Utah. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8240208 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Jamaal Effect: A Breath of Fresh Air or a Smoggy Situation?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the mysteriously whimsical relationship between the popularity of the first name Jamaal and levels of air pollution in Provo, Utah. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our team sought to uncover whether there is a statistical connection between the frequency of the name "Jamaal" and the air quality in this charming city. To our astonishment, the analysis revealed an unexpected correlation coefficient of 0.8240208 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2022.

Prepare to be floored by our findings as we explore whether the presence of "Jamaal" in Provo has been a breath of fresh air or a cause of a smoggy situation. Our results will leave you gasping for breath – whether it's from laughter or surprise, you'll have to find out!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jamaal and Air pollution in Provo, Utah. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Jamaal Effect: A Breath of Fresh Air or a Smoggy Situation?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the mysteriously whimsical relationship between the popularity of the first name Jamaal and levels of air pollution in Provo, Utah. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our team sought to uncover whether there is a statistical connection between the frequency of the name "Jamaal" and the air quality in this charming city. To our astonishment, the analysis revealed an unexpected correlation coefficient of 0.8240208 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2022.

Prepare to be floored by our findings as we explore whether the presence of "Jamaal" in Provo has been a breath of fresh air or a cause of a smoggy situation. Our results will leave you gasping for breath – whether it's from laughter or surprise, you'll have to find out!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Welcome, dear reader, to the whimsical world of statistical serendipity where the peculiar and the preposterous collide. Today, we embark on a journey to unravel the enigmatic link between the popularity of the first name Jamaal and the atmospheric shenanigans of Provo, Utah. With a hint of absurdity and a sprinkle of curiosity, we invite you to join us in a quest that promises to be as refreshing as a breath of the crisp mountain air or as murky as a foggy day in the valley.

As the world grapples with environmental challenges, it is imperative to explore every nook and cranny, or in this case, every consonant and vowel, in our pursuit of understanding. While it may seem like a flight of fancy to associate the moniker "Jamaal" with the quality of the air we breathe, our preliminary investigations have ushered in a gust of bewilderment that beckons further exploration.

The name "Jamaal" exudes a charisma that is both captivating and confounding. Could it be that its resonance reverberates through the very particles that make up the air in Provo? Or perhaps, there exists a cosmic dance between the phonetic symphony of "Jamaal" and the atmospheric composition, unbeknownst to us mere mortals?

Amidst the intrigue and the seemingly preposterous premise, we assure you that our endeavor is rooted in the rigorous realms of statistical analysis and empirical inquiry. Our endeavor is not merely an act of whimsy, but an earnest attempt to shine a quirky light on the ever-present enigma of environmental influences.

Unfurling the banners of curiosity and armed with the twin weapons of data and analysis, we invite you to journey with us as we unravel the "Jamaal Effect." At the intersection of nomenclature and nature, we promise to deliver findings that will leave you breathless – whether from astonishment or mirth, we leave to your discretion.

So buckle up, dear reader, for an academic escapade that promises to be as riveting as it is riotous. As we unfurl the tale of "The Jamaal Effect," prepare to be whisked away on a windstorm of statistical oddities and environmentally eccentric revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jamaal and Air pollution in Provo, Utah. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Jamaal Effect: A Breath of Fresh Air or a Smoggy Situation?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the mysteriously whimsical relationship between the popularity of the first name Jamaal and levels of air pollution in Provo, Utah. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our team sought to uncover whether there is a statistical connection between the frequency of the name "Jamaal" and the air quality in this charming city. To our astonishment, the analysis revealed an unexpected correlation coefficient of 0.8240208 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2022.

Prepare to be floored by our findings as we explore whether the presence of "Jamaal" in Provo has been a breath of fresh air or a cause of a smoggy situation. Our results will leave you gasping for breath – whether it's from laughter or surprise, you'll have to find out!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Welcome, dear reader, to the whimsical world of statistical serendipity where the peculiar and the preposterous collide. Today, we embark on a journey to unravel the enigmatic link between the popularity of the first name Jamaal and the atmospheric shenanigans of Provo, Utah. With a hint of absurdity and a sprinkle of curiosity, we invite you to join us in a quest that promises to be as refreshing as a breath of the crisp mountain air or as murky as a foggy day in the valley.
As the world grapples with environmental challenges, it is imperative to explore every nook and cranny, or in this case, every consonant and vowel, in our pursuit of understanding. While it may seem like a flight of fancy to associate the moniker "Jamaal" with the quality of the air we breathe, our preliminary investigations have ushered in a gust of bewilderment that beckons further exploration.
The name "Jamaal" exudes a charisma that is both captivating and confounding. Could it be that its resonance reverberates through the very particles that make up the air in Provo? Or perhaps, there exists a cosmic dance between the phonetic symphony of "Jamaal" and the atmospheric composition, unbeknownst to us mere mortals?
Amidst the intrigue and the seemingly preposterous premise, we assure you that our endeavor is rooted in the rigorous realms of statistical analysis and empirical inquiry. Our endeavor is not merely an act of whimsy, but an earnest attempt to shine a quirky light on the ever-present enigma of environmental influences.
Unfurling the banners of curiosity and armed with the twin weapons of data and analysis, we invite you to journey with us as we unravel the "Jamaal Effect." At the intersection of nomenclature and nature, we promise to deliver findings that will leave you breathless – whether from astonishment or mirth, we leave to your discretion.
So buckle up, dear reader, for an academic escapade that promises to be as riveting as it is riotous. As we unfurl the tale of "The Jamaal Effect," prepare to be whisked away on a windstorm of statistical oddities and environmentally eccentric revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al."(2015), the authors find that air pollution is a significant concern in urban areas, impacting the health and well-being of inhabitants. The study emphasizes the need for comprehensive measures to address the sources of air pollution and mitigate its adverse effects. Similarly, "Doe and Jones" (2012) highlight the relationship between demographic factors and environmental quality, shedding light on the interplay between population characteristics and air pollution levels.

However, as we dig deeper into the correlation between the popularity of the first name Jamaal and air pollution in Provo, Utah, we veer into uncharted territory akin to navigating through a whimsical maze of statistical anomalies and oddities. Our journey transcends the conventional realms of environmental research and delves into the marvelously peculiar realm of nomenclature and its potential impact on atmospheric whimsy.

Venturing beyond the scholarly confines, let us explore the intersection of this inexplicable phenomenon with non-fiction literature that illustrates the enigmatic nature of our study. "The Air We Breathe" by Andrea Barrett provides a captivating insight into the historical and scientific aspects of air quality, but regrettably, the exploration of the "Jamaal Effect" remains a whimsical tale yet to be woven into its pages. Likewise, "This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate" by Naomi Klein offers a compelling critique of environmental policies, but seems to overlook the whimsical influence of nomenclature on atmospheric composition.

In a fantastical twist, fiction literature leads us to curious conjectures. The whimsical adventures of "The Wind in the Willows" by Kenneth Grahame cast an imaginative spell, but alas, the mischievous escapades of Mr. Toad fail to guide us through the foggy mysteries of the "Jamaal Effect." Furthermore, the enigmatic atmosphere of Emily St. John Mandel's "Station Eleven" envelopes us in an intriguing narrative, yet the tantalizing allure of the "Jamaal Effect" eludes the characters as they navigate a post-apocalyptic world.

Enraptured by childhood memories, we are drawn to the animated realms of "Captain Planet and the Planeteers," where environmental guardians championed ecological causes. Perhaps even Captain Planet himself could not foresee the mysterious connection between the popularity of "Jamaal" and air pollution levels in Provo, Utah amidst his valiant efforts to combat environmental villains.

In a final whimsical exploration, the misadventures of "The Magic School Bus" led by the indomitable Ms. Frizzle transport us on educational escapades. While the school bus embarks on thrilling journeys through the human body and beyond, we are left yearning for a whimsical episode that unravels the confounding "Jamaal Effect" and its influence on atmospheric phenomena.

As we revel in the unconventional musings, our quest for understanding the "Jamaal Effect" stands at the cusp of whimsy and wonder. The intersection of popular nomenclature and environmental variables continues to beckon us towards a realm where statistical anomalies collide with the delightfully absurd.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jamaal and Air pollution in Provo, Utah. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 1980 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Jamaal Effect: A Breath of Fresh Air or a Smoggy Situation?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the mysteriously whimsical relationship between the popularity of the first name Jamaal and levels of air pollution in Provo, Utah. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our team sought to uncover whether there is a statistical connection between the frequency of the name "Jamaal" and the air quality in this charming city. To our astonishment, the analysis revealed an unexpected correlation coefficient of 0.8240208 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2022.

Prepare to be floored by our findings as we explore whether the presence of "Jamaal" in Provo has been a breath of fresh air or a cause of a smoggy situation. Our results will leave you gasping for breath – whether it's from laughter or surprise, you'll have to find out!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Welcome, dear reader, to the whimsical world of statistical serendipity where the peculiar and the preposterous collide. Today, we embark on a journey to unravel the enigmatic link between the popularity of the first name Jamaal and the atmospheric shenanigans of Provo, Utah. With a hint of absurdity and a sprinkle of curiosity, we invite you to join us in a quest that promises to be as refreshing as a breath of the crisp mountain air or as murky as a foggy day in the valley.
As the world grapples with environmental challenges, it is imperative to explore every nook and cranny, or in this case, every consonant and vowel, in our pursuit of understanding. While it may seem like a flight of fancy to associate the moniker "Jamaal" with the quality of the air we breathe, our preliminary investigations have ushered in a gust of bewilderment that beckons further exploration.
The name "Jamaal" exudes a charisma that is both captivating and confounding. Could it be that its resonance reverberates through the very particles that make up the air in Provo? Or perhaps, there exists a cosmic dance between the phonetic symphony of "Jamaal" and the atmospheric composition, unbeknownst to us mere mortals?
Amidst the intrigue and the seemingly preposterous premise, we assure you that our endeavor is rooted in the rigorous realms of statistical analysis and empirical inquiry. Our endeavor is not merely an act of whimsy, but an earnest attempt to shine a quirky light on the ever-present enigma of environmental influences.
Unfurling the banners of curiosity and armed with the twin weapons of data and analysis, we invite you to journey with us as we unravel the "Jamaal Effect." At the intersection of nomenclature and nature, we promise to deliver findings that will leave you breathless – whether from astonishment or mirth, we leave to your discretion.
So buckle up, dear reader, for an academic escapade that promises to be as riveting as it is riotous. As we unfurl the tale of "The Jamaal Effect," prepare to be whisked away on a windstorm of statistical oddities and environmentally eccentric revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

As we delved into the whimsical world of statistically serendipitous connections, we found ourselves faced with the perplexing task of unraveling the elusive "Jamaal Effect" on air pollution in Provo, Utah. To tackle this enigmatic conundrum, our research team crafted a methodology that combines the rigorousness of empirical inquiry with a dash of audacious curiosity.

First and foremost, we scoured the vast expanse of the internet to gather data pertaining to the popularity of the first name "Jamaal" and air pollution levels in Provo, Utah. From the hallowed archives of the US Social Security Administration to the bustling halls of the Environmental Protection Agency's digital repositories, we embarked on a daring quest to gather the necessary data for our investigation.

Armed with an incorrigible spirit of empiricism, we harnessed the magical powers of data mining and statistical analysis to extract insights from the years 1980 to 2022. Our team of intrepid researchers braved the treacherous terrain of databases and spreadsheets, navigating the labyrinthine corridors of numbers and nomenclature to tease out the elusive relationship between the eponymous "Jamaal" and the atmospheric antics of Provo.

Additionally, our methodology involved an unconventional yet undeniably whimsical approach to data interpretation. Drawing inspiration from the zephyrs of inventive thinking and the tempests of creativity, we employed a bespoke algorithmic concoction that blended statistical models with a pinch of whimsy and a sprinkling of statistical serendipity.

In a quixotic dance of mathematical machinations and empirical escapades, we sought to unveil the hidden threads that bind the popularity of the name "Jamaal" to the ethereal dance of air particles in the Provo skies. With a twinkle in our eyes and a flair for statistical showmanship, we embarked on a daring endeavor that promised to reveal whether "Jamaal" was a breath of fresh air or a harbinger of atmospheric shenanigans in Provo, Utah.

In our relentless pursuit of statistical mirth and empirical marvel, we hereby present the methodology that laid the foundation for uncovering the whimsical and wondrous "Jamaal Effect" on air pollution in Provo, Utah. Join us as we traverse the improbable path toward statistical enlightenment, where the improbable becomes the possible and the whimsical becomes the empirical reality.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jamaal and Air pollution in Provo, Utah. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 1980 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8240208, r-squared of 0.6790102, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Jamaal Effect: A Breath of Fresh Air or a Smoggy Situation?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the mysteriously whimsical relationship between the popularity of the first name Jamaal and levels of air pollution in Provo, Utah. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our team sought to uncover whether there is a statistical connection between the frequency of the name "Jamaal" and the air quality in this charming city. To our astonishment, the analysis revealed an unexpected correlation coefficient of 0.8240208 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2022.

Prepare to be floored by our findings as we explore whether the presence of "Jamaal" in Provo has been a breath of fresh air or a cause of a smoggy situation. Our results will leave you gasping for breath – whether it's from laughter or surprise, you'll have to find out!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Welcome, dear reader, to the whimsical world of statistical serendipity where the peculiar and the preposterous collide. Today, we embark on a journey to unravel the enigmatic link between the popularity of the first name Jamaal and the atmospheric shenanigans of Provo, Utah. With a hint of absurdity and a sprinkle of curiosity, we invite you to join us in a quest that promises to be as refreshing as a breath of the crisp mountain air or as murky as a foggy day in the valley.
As the world grapples with environmental challenges, it is imperative to explore every nook and cranny, or in this case, every consonant and vowel, in our pursuit of understanding. While it may seem like a flight of fancy to associate the moniker "Jamaal" with the quality of the air we breathe, our preliminary investigations have ushered in a gust of bewilderment that beckons further exploration.
The name "Jamaal" exudes a charisma that is both captivating and confounding. Could it be that its resonance reverberates through the very particles that make up the air in Provo? Or perhaps, there exists a cosmic dance between the phonetic symphony of "Jamaal" and the atmospheric composition, unbeknownst to us mere mortals?
Amidst the intrigue and the seemingly preposterous premise, we assure you that our endeavor is rooted in the rigorous realms of statistical analysis and empirical inquiry. Our endeavor is not merely an act of whimsy, but an earnest attempt to shine a quirky light on the ever-present enigma of environmental influences.
Unfurling the banners of curiosity and armed with the twin weapons of data and analysis, we invite you to journey with us as we unravel the "Jamaal Effect." At the intersection of nomenclature and nature, we promise to deliver findings that will leave you breathless – whether from astonishment or mirth, we leave to your discretion.
So buckle up, dear reader, for an academic escapade that promises to be as riveting as it is riotous. As we unfurl the tale of "The Jamaal Effect," prepare to be whisked away on a windstorm of statistical oddities and environmentally eccentric revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency yielded some truly captivating results. Our team of intrepid researchers discovered a surprisingly robust correlation between the frequency of the first name "Jamaal" and the levels of air pollution in Provo, Utah, spanning from 1980 to 2022.

The correlation coefficient of 0.8240208 indicates a remarkably strong positive relationship between the popularity of the name "Jamaal" and air pollution levels in Provo. This statistical finding is certainly nothing to sneeze at – or maybe it is, considering the air quality implications!

Moreover, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.6790102 provides further evidence that approximately 68% of the variability in air pollution levels can be explained by the frequency of the name "Jamaal." It seems that there's more to Jamaal than meets the eye – or should we say, the lung?

And if that's not convincing enough, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates a high level of statistical significance, suggesting that the observed correlation is not merely a fluke, but indeed a bona fide phenomenon. It's almost as if the name "Jamaal" has been leaving its mark on the atmospheric composition of Provo in more ways than one.

Now, for the pièce de résistance – the much-anticipated figure (Fig. 1). Behold the scatterplot that showcases the striking correlation between the frequency of the name "Jamaal" and air pollution levels in Provo, Utah. It's a sight to behold, a veritable feast for the eyes, and a gentle reminder that sometimes the most unexpected connections can be found in the most unlikely places.

In conclusion, our findings suggest that the presence of the first name "Jamaal" may indeed exert a discernible influence on the air quality in Provo, Utah. Whether this influence is a breath of fresh air or a smoggy situation is a matter for further exploration and contemplation. It's enough to make us wonder – is there a contemporary fairy tale brewing in the streets of Provo, with Jamaal as the protagonist and air pollution as the reluctant co-star?

So, dear reader, as we draw the curtain on this latest chapter of the "Jamaal Effect," we leave you with this parting thought: the world of statistical inquiry knows no bounds, and sometimes, the unlikeliest of connections can leave us speechless – or at the very least, searching for a breath of fresh air.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jamaal and Air pollution in Provo, Utah. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Jamaal Effect: A Breath of Fresh Air or a Smoggy Situation?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the mysteriously whimsical relationship between the popularity of the first name Jamaal and levels of air pollution in Provo, Utah. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our team sought to uncover whether there is a statistical connection between the frequency of the name "Jamaal" and the air quality in this charming city. To our astonishment, the analysis revealed an unexpected correlation coefficient of 0.8240208 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2022.

Prepare to be floored by our findings as we explore whether the presence of "Jamaal" in Provo has been a breath of fresh air or a cause of a smoggy situation. Our results will leave you gasping for breath – whether it's from laughter or surprise, you'll have to find out!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al."(2015), the authors find that air pollution is a significant concern in urban areas, impacting the health and well-being of inhabitants. The study emphasizes the need for comprehensive measures to address the sources of air pollution and mitigate its adverse effects. Similarly, "Doe and Jones" (2012) highlight the relationship between demographic factors and environmental quality, shedding light on the interplay between population characteristics and air pollution levels.
However, as we dig deeper into the correlation between the popularity of the first name Jamaal and air pollution in Provo, Utah, we veer into uncharted territory akin to navigating through a whimsical maze of statistical anomalies and oddities. Our journey transcends the conventional realms of environmental research and delves into the marvelously peculiar realm of nomenclature and its potential impact on atmospheric whimsy.
Venturing beyond the scholarly confines, let us explore the intersection of this inexplicable phenomenon with non-fiction literature that illustrates the enigmatic nature of our study. "The Air We Breathe" by Andrea Barrett provides a captivating insight into the historical and scientific aspects of air quality, but regrettably, the exploration of the "Jamaal Effect" remains a whimsical tale yet to be woven into its pages. Likewise, "This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate" by Naomi Klein offers a compelling critique of environmental policies, but seems to overlook the whimsical influence of nomenclature on atmospheric composition.
In a fantastical twist, fiction literature leads us to curious conjectures. The whimsical adventures of "The Wind in the Willows" by Kenneth Grahame cast an imaginative spell, but alas, the mischievous escapades of Mr. Toad fail to guide us through the foggy mysteries of the "Jamaal Effect." Furthermore, the enigmatic atmosphere of Emily St. John Mandel's "Station Eleven" envelopes us in an intriguing narrative, yet the tantalizing allure of the "Jamaal Effect" eludes the characters as they navigate a post-apocalyptic world.
Enraptured by childhood memories, we are drawn to the animated realms of "Captain Planet and the Planeteers," where environmental guardians championed ecological causes. Perhaps even Captain Planet himself could not foresee the mysterious connection between the popularity of "Jamaal" and air pollution levels in Provo, Utah amidst his valiant efforts to combat environmental villains.
In a final whimsical exploration, the misadventures of "The Magic School Bus" led by the indomitable Ms. Frizzle transport us on educational escapades. While the school bus embarks on thrilling journeys through the human body and beyond, we are left yearning for a whimsical episode that unravels the confounding "Jamaal Effect" and its influence on atmospheric phenomena.
As we revel in the unconventional musings, our quest for understanding the "Jamaal Effect" stands at the cusp of whimsy and wonder. The intersection of popular nomenclature and environmental variables continues to beckon us towards a realm where statistical anomalies collide with the delightfully absurd.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency yielded some truly captivating results. Our team of intrepid researchers discovered a surprisingly robust correlation between the frequency of the first name "Jamaal" and the levels of air pollution in Provo, Utah, spanning from 1980 to 2022.
The correlation coefficient of 0.8240208 indicates a remarkably strong positive relationship between the popularity of the name "Jamaal" and air pollution levels in Provo. This statistical finding is certainly nothing to sneeze at – or maybe it is, considering the air quality implications!
Moreover, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.6790102 provides further evidence that approximately 68% of the variability in air pollution levels can be explained by the frequency of the name "Jamaal." It seems that there's more to Jamaal than meets the eye – or should we say, the lung?
And if that's not convincing enough, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates a high level of statistical significance, suggesting that the observed correlation is not merely a fluke, but indeed a bona fide phenomenon. It's almost as if the name "Jamaal" has been leaving its mark on the atmospheric composition of Provo in more ways than one.
Now, for the pièce de résistance – the much-anticipated figure (Fig. 1). Behold the scatterplot that showcases the striking correlation between the frequency of the name "Jamaal" and air pollution levels in Provo, Utah. It's a sight to behold, a veritable feast for the eyes, and a gentle reminder that sometimes the most unexpected connections can be found in the most unlikely places.
In conclusion, our findings suggest that the presence of the first name "Jamaal" may indeed exert a discernible influence on the air quality in Provo, Utah. Whether this influence is a breath of fresh air or a smoggy situation is a matter for further exploration and contemplation. It's enough to make us wonder – is there a contemporary fairy tale brewing in the streets of Provo, with Jamaal as the protagonist and air pollution as the reluctant co-star?
So, dear reader, as we draw the curtain on this latest chapter of the "Jamaal Effect," we leave you with this parting thought: the world of statistical inquiry knows no bounds, and sometimes, the unlikeliest of connections can leave us speechless – or at the very least, searching for a breath of fresh air.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have uncovered a correlation that may initially seem fantastical but warrants a serious examination. The statistically robust relationship between the frequency of the first name "Jamaal" and air pollution levels in Provo, Utah challenges conventional understanding. Despite the whimsical nature of our investigation, the results support prior research linking demographic factors to environmental quality.

Reflecting on the comical notion of "Jamaal's Air," it seems the name may indeed leave a significant imprint on the atmospheric composition. Just as Captain Planet sought to battle environmental villains, Jamaal appears to have inadvertently influenced the air quality in Provo. It's as if a whimsical episode of "The Magic School Bus" has unfolded, revealing the smokey tail of the Jamaal Effect.

The correlation coefficient and p-value underscore the legitimacy of our findings, emphasizing that this is no mere statistical fluke. Our data, much like the mischievous escapades of Mr. Toad, lead us through the foggy mysteries surrounding the name "Jamaal" and its atmospheric influence. The research of "Smith et al." and "Doe and Jones" has laid the groundwork for our exploration, and remarkably, our findings align with their emphasis on the interplay between population characteristics and air pollution levels.

In our quest for understanding, we encountered statistical anomalies akin to the whimsical tales woven by Kenneth Grahame and Emily St. John Mandel. As enigmatic as the "Jamaal Effect" may be, our study contemplates a contemporary fairy tale unfolding in Provo, with Jamaal as the protagonist and air pollution as the reluctant co-star. The unexpected connections we've found leave us breathless, much like the characters navigating a post-apocalyptic world in "Station Eleven."

In conclusion, our research presents a novel layer to the intricate tapestry of environmental factors. While the implications of the Jamaal Effect may seem whimsical, they warrant further exploration and contemplation. Indeed, the unlikeliest of connections can lead to the most enlightening discoveries. Our study invites further inquiry into the lingering question: is Jamaal a breath of fresh air or a smoggy situation for Provo, Utah? It appears the whimsically improbable has a place in the world of scientific inquiry after all!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jamaal and Air pollution in Provo, Utah. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Jamaal Effect: A Breath of Fresh Air or a Smoggy Situation?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the mysteriously whimsical relationship between the popularity of the first name Jamaal and levels of air pollution in Provo, Utah. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our team sought to uncover whether there is a statistical connection between the frequency of the name "Jamaal" and the air quality in this charming city. To our astonishment, the analysis revealed an unexpected correlation coefficient of 0.8240208 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2022.

Prepare to be floored by our findings as we explore whether the presence of "Jamaal" in Provo has been a breath of fresh air or a cause of a smoggy situation. Our results will leave you gasping for breath – whether it's from laughter or surprise, you'll have to find out!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Welcome, dear reader, to the whimsical world of statistical serendipity where the peculiar and the preposterous collide. Today, we embark on a journey to unravel the enigmatic link between the popularity of the first name Jamaal and the atmospheric shenanigans of Provo, Utah. With a hint of absurdity and a sprinkle of curiosity, we invite you to join us in a quest that promises to be as refreshing as a breath of the crisp mountain air or as murky as a foggy day in the valley.
As the world grapples with environmental challenges, it is imperative to explore every nook and cranny, or in this case, every consonant and vowel, in our pursuit of understanding. While it may seem like a flight of fancy to associate the moniker "Jamaal" with the quality of the air we breathe, our preliminary investigations have ushered in a gust of bewilderment that beckons further exploration.
The name "Jamaal" exudes a charisma that is both captivating and confounding. Could it be that its resonance reverberates through the very particles that make up the air in Provo? Or perhaps, there exists a cosmic dance between the phonetic symphony of "Jamaal" and the atmospheric composition, unbeknownst to us mere mortals?
Amidst the intrigue and the seemingly preposterous premise, we assure you that our endeavor is rooted in the rigorous realms of statistical analysis and empirical inquiry. Our endeavor is not merely an act of whimsy, but an earnest attempt to shine a quirky light on the ever-present enigma of environmental influences.
Unfurling the banners of curiosity and armed with the twin weapons of data and analysis, we invite you to journey with us as we unravel the "Jamaal Effect." At the intersection of nomenclature and nature, we promise to deliver findings that will leave you breathless – whether from astonishment or mirth, we leave to your discretion.
So buckle up, dear reader, for an academic escapade that promises to be as riveting as it is riotous. As we unfurl the tale of "The Jamaal Effect," prepare to be whisked away on a windstorm of statistical oddities and environmentally eccentric revelations.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency yielded some truly captivating results. Our team of intrepid researchers discovered a surprisingly robust correlation between the frequency of the first name "Jamaal" and the levels of air pollution in Provo, Utah, spanning from 1980 to 2022.
The correlation coefficient of 0.8240208 indicates a remarkably strong positive relationship between the popularity of the name "Jamaal" and air pollution levels in Provo. This statistical finding is certainly nothing to sneeze at – or maybe it is, considering the air quality implications!
Moreover, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.6790102 provides further evidence that approximately 68% of the variability in air pollution levels can be explained by the frequency of the name "Jamaal." It seems that there's more to Jamaal than meets the eye – or should we say, the lung?
And if that's not convincing enough, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates a high level of statistical significance, suggesting that the observed correlation is not merely a fluke, but indeed a bona fide phenomenon. It's almost as if the name "Jamaal" has been leaving its mark on the atmospheric composition of Provo in more ways than one.
Now, for the pièce de résistance – the much-anticipated figure (Fig. 1). Behold the scatterplot that showcases the striking correlation between the frequency of the name "Jamaal" and air pollution levels in Provo, Utah. It's a sight to behold, a veritable feast for the eyes, and a gentle reminder that sometimes the most unexpected connections can be found in the most unlikely places.
In conclusion, our findings suggest that the presence of the first name "Jamaal" may indeed exert a discernible influence on the air quality in Provo, Utah. Whether this influence is a breath of fresh air or a smoggy situation is a matter for further exploration and contemplation. It's enough to make us wonder – is there a contemporary fairy tale brewing in the streets of Provo, with Jamaal as the protagonist and air pollution as the reluctant co-star?
So, dear reader, as we draw the curtain on this latest chapter of the "Jamaal Effect," we leave you with this parting thought: the world of statistical inquiry knows no bounds, and sometimes, the unlikeliest of connections can leave us speechless – or at the very least, searching for a breath of fresh air.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In a surprising turn of events, our research has undeniably unveiled a correlation between the frequency of the name "Jamaal" and the air pollution levels in the charming city of Provo, Utah. It seems that the whimsical wanderings of statistical serendipity have led us to a revelation that is as convoluted as it is comical. Who would have thought that a name could leave such a pronounced imprint on the very air we breathe?

As we wrap up this peculiar pursuit, we can't help but wonder if the atmosphere in Provo has been playing a whimsical game of "Jamaal and the Beanstalk," with Jamaal’s influence towering over the city's skies. Perhaps it's time to coin a new term – "The Jamaal Pollution Effect" – where the atmospheric quirks of Provo collide with the phonetic resonance of Jamaal in a cosmic dance of cosmic proportions.

In the spirit of academic merriment, we must acknowledge that our findings do raise more questions than they answer. Is this a breath of fresh air, or are we merely exhaling a cloud of confusion? A smoggy situation, or a whimsical whirlwind of statistical happenstance? The enigma of Jamaal and air pollution in Provo offers a cocktail of curiosity and chuckles that leaves us caught betwixt and between.

But fear not, dear reader, for we are prepared to draw the curtain on this saga and declare with utmost conviction that no more research is needed in this peculiar domain. The Jamaal Effect, with its frolicsome statistical oddities and thoroughly unexpected correlations, has received its due attention. It is time to bid adieu to the whimsy of Jamaal and the air in Provo, and to embrace new frontiers of scholarly pursuit.

So let us exhale one last time and relinquish our statistical whimsy to the annals of academic curiosity, with a fond farewell to the air of Provo, the name of Jamaal, and the unexpected mirth they have brought to our scholarly escapades. There are plenty more puzzling puzzles awaiting our academic audacity, and we must march forth to conquer them with the same merriment that has colored our exploration of the Jamaal Effect.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Jamaal Effect: A Breath of Fresh Air or a Smoggy Situation?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Environmental Psychology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Jamaal Effect: A Breath of Fresh Air or a Smoggy Situation?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Atmospheric Health and Well-being


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Jamaal Effect: A Breath of Fresh Air or a Smoggy Situation? with an abstract of This groundbreaking research delves into the mysteriously whimsical relationship between the popularity of the first name Jamaal and levels of air pollution in Provo, Utah. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our team sought to uncover whether there is a statistical connection between the frequency of the name "Jamaal" and the air quality in this charming city. To our astonishment, the analysis revealed an unexpected correlation coefficient of 0.8240208 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2022.
Prepare to be floored by our findings as we explore whether the presence of "Jamaal" in Provo has been a breath of fresh air or a cause of a smoggy situation. Our results will leave you gasping for breath – whether it's from laughter or surprise, you'll have to find out!

ChatGPT:

Jamaal, air pollution, Provo, Utah, correlation, US Social Security Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, statistical analysis, air quality, name frequency, surprising correlation coefficient, p-value, 1980-2022

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Jamaal
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Jamaal
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Jamaal

Air pollution in Provo, Utah
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Provo-Orem, UT
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Provo, Utah

Correlation r = 0.8240208 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6790102 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 67.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Provo, Utah) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Jamaal) over the 43 years from 1980 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.1E-11. 0.0000000000113599480036372600
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 1.1E-9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 88,028,571,934 random variables You don't actually need 88 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 42 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 42 because we have two variables measured over a period of 43 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.7, 0.9 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Jamaal (Babies born)4463877245874033462582642532512332552281931781441351121161221101011331171111171251188710288758262616671704253354832
Air pollution in Provo, Utah (Bad air quality days)57.65036089.041182.692365.84775.068569.041166.849366.666761.095949.58943.287745.355255.61646046.027447.814236.164448.219257.260354.644852.876756.438449.315152.185839.452149.58956.164455.191345.479546.027442.739749.453648.767135.616437.808239.07149.86340.27430.684935.24594032.8767




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([446,387,724,587,403,346,258,264,253,251,233,255,228,193,178,144,135,112,116,122,110,101,133,117,111,117,125,118,87,102,88,75,82,62,61,66,71,70,42,53,35,48,32,])
array_2 = np.array([57.6503,60,89.0411,82.6923,65.847,75.0685,69.0411,66.8493,66.6667,61.0959,49.589,43.2877,45.3552,55.6164,60,46.0274,47.8142,36.1644,48.2192,57.2603,54.6448,52.8767,56.4384,49.3151,52.1858,39.4521,49.589,56.1644,55.1913,45.4795,46.0274,42.7397,49.4536,48.7671,35.6164,37.8082,39.071,49.863,40.274,30.6849,35.2459,40,32.8767,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Jamaal"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Provo, Utah"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 5449 · Black Variable ID: 4180 · Red Variable ID: 21100
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0