about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,441 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme and the second variable is Total length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the 'this is fine' meme gained traction, more and more people found themselves in situations that were definitely not fine. This led to an uptick in demand for Steve Mould's scientifically sound explanations to help them understand why things were, in fact, not fine. As a result, Steve Mould felt the pressure to extend the length of his videos in order to delve deeper into these complex concepts and provide the comprehensive understanding needed to cope with life's decidedly non-fine moments. Remember, when things seem to be going up in flames, Steve Mould's videos are here to help you understand the combustion process!

Create a meme inspired by the this is fine meme that in some way references Total length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos. Try to emulate the style of the meme - don’t violate the copyright, just make it look and feel like the original meme.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme caused Total length of Steve Mould YouTube videos to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
It's Fine, Lengthen the Variables: Exploring the Link Between the 'this is fine' Meme Popularity and Total Length of Steve Mould YouTube Videos

The Journal of Internet Culture and Digital Media

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme and Total length of Steve Mould YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9625506 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"It's Fine, Lengthen the Variables: Exploring the Link Between the 'this is fine' Meme Popularity and Total Length of Steve Mould YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intriguing confluence of internet meme culture and science communication by investigating the connection between the prevalence of the 'this is fine' meme and the total length of educational YouTube videos by science communicator Steve Mould. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube between 2009 and 2023, our findings revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9625506 and a p-value of less than 0.01, highlighting a robust statistical relationship. We present our statistically significant results with a wry nod to the surreal nature of meme phenomena and the delightful unpredictability in the realm of online content creation. Our study offers playful insights into the unexpected interplay between internet memes and educational content, reminding us that even in the world of empirical inquiry, it's perfectly fine to intersperse a little humor amidst the serious analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme and Total length of Steve Mould YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"It's Fine, Lengthen the Variables: Exploring the Link Between the 'this is fine' Meme Popularity and Total Length of Steve Mould YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intriguing confluence of internet meme culture and science communication by investigating the connection between the prevalence of the 'this is fine' meme and the total length of educational YouTube videos by science communicator Steve Mould. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube between 2009 and 2023, our findings revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9625506 and a p-value of less than 0.01, highlighting a robust statistical relationship. We present our statistically significant results with a wry nod to the surreal nature of meme phenomena and the delightful unpredictability in the realm of online content creation. Our study offers playful insights into the unexpected interplay between internet memes and educational content, reminding us that even in the world of empirical inquiry, it's perfectly fine to intersperse a little humor amidst the serious analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In recent years, the internet has become an integral part of modern culture, serving as a platform for the circulation of innumerable memes that capture the zeitgeist of our digital age. Among these memes, the 'this is fine' meme stands out as a particularly enduring and versatile symbol of resigned acceptance amidst chaos and adversity. Its pervasive presence across various online communities has piqued the curiosity of researchers, prompting an exploration into its potential influence on seemingly unrelated domains, such as science communication through online video content.

Simultaneously, the rise of science communicators on digital platforms has revolutionized the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge, often blurring the lines between entertainment and education. Steve Mould, a popular figure in the science communication sphere, has garnered a substantial following on YouTube with his engaging and informative videos, which cover a diverse array of scientific phenomena and principles.

When considering the correlation between the proliferation of the 'this is fine' meme and the total length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos, one might initially perceive a rather perplexing juxtaposition. However, it is within this seemingly incongruous juxtaposition that we uncover an opportunity to unravel the potential interplay between internet meme culture and the production of educational content in the digital realm. As such, this study aims to shed light on the unexpected relationship between the popularity of a meme that portrays nonchalance in the face of calamity and the duration of educational videos aiming to foster curiosity and understanding of scientific concepts.

In navigating this scholarly pursuit, it becomes evident that the merger of internet memes and scientific content creation prompts a profound contemplation of the paradoxical nature of online engagement. While memes often serve as succinct and witty expressions of cultural sentiments, educational videos carry the weight of elucidating complex concepts with veritable depth. This intersection of brevity and depth invites us to explore the nuanced dynamics between the lighthearted nature of viral content and the substantial depth of educational discourse, blurring the boundaries between the whimsical and the erudite.

By ferreting out the statistical relationship between the prevalence of the 'this is fine' meme and the length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos, we endeavor to unravel the peculiar web of connections that exists within the digital sphere. Furthermore, by delving into this uncharted territory, we hope to inject a dash of levity into the often austere realm of scholarly inquiry, proving that even in the pursuit of empirical evidence, there's room for a bit of whimsical wonderment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme and Total length of Steve Mould YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"It's Fine, Lengthen the Variables: Exploring the Link Between the 'this is fine' Meme Popularity and Total Length of Steve Mould YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intriguing confluence of internet meme culture and science communication by investigating the connection between the prevalence of the 'this is fine' meme and the total length of educational YouTube videos by science communicator Steve Mould. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube between 2009 and 2023, our findings revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9625506 and a p-value of less than 0.01, highlighting a robust statistical relationship. We present our statistically significant results with a wry nod to the surreal nature of meme phenomena and the delightful unpredictability in the realm of online content creation. Our study offers playful insights into the unexpected interplay between internet memes and educational content, reminding us that even in the world of empirical inquiry, it's perfectly fine to intersperse a little humor amidst the serious analysis.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In recent years, the internet has become an integral part of modern culture, serving as a platform for the circulation of innumerable memes that capture the zeitgeist of our digital age. Among these memes, the 'this is fine' meme stands out as a particularly enduring and versatile symbol of resigned acceptance amidst chaos and adversity. Its pervasive presence across various online communities has piqued the curiosity of researchers, prompting an exploration into its potential influence on seemingly unrelated domains, such as science communication through online video content.
Simultaneously, the rise of science communicators on digital platforms has revolutionized the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge, often blurring the lines between entertainment and education. Steve Mould, a popular figure in the science communication sphere, has garnered a substantial following on YouTube with his engaging and informative videos, which cover a diverse array of scientific phenomena and principles.
When considering the correlation between the proliferation of the 'this is fine' meme and the total length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos, one might initially perceive a rather perplexing juxtaposition. However, it is within this seemingly incongruous juxtaposition that we uncover an opportunity to unravel the potential interplay between internet meme culture and the production of educational content in the digital realm. As such, this study aims to shed light on the unexpected relationship between the popularity of a meme that portrays nonchalance in the face of calamity and the duration of educational videos aiming to foster curiosity and understanding of scientific concepts.
In navigating this scholarly pursuit, it becomes evident that the merger of internet memes and scientific content creation prompts a profound contemplation of the paradoxical nature of online engagement. While memes often serve as succinct and witty expressions of cultural sentiments, educational videos carry the weight of elucidating complex concepts with veritable depth. This intersection of brevity and depth invites us to explore the nuanced dynamics between the lighthearted nature of viral content and the substantial depth of educational discourse, blurring the boundaries between the whimsical and the erudite.
By ferreting out the statistical relationship between the prevalence of the 'this is fine' meme and the length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos, we endeavor to unravel the peculiar web of connections that exists within the digital sphere. Furthermore, by delving into this uncharted territory, we hope to inject a dash of levity into the often austere realm of scholarly inquiry, proving that even in the pursuit of empirical evidence, there's room for a bit of whimsical wonderment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

When examining the curious nexus between the popularity of the 'this is fine' meme and the total length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos, our investigation revealed a labyrinth of unexpected connections that provoke both scholarly contemplation and whimsical amusement. At the outset, we scrutinize the serious literary tomes that underpin the foundation of our exploratory journey. Smith et al. (2017) offer a meticulous analysis of internet meme propagation dynamics, shedding light on the structural components and cultural significance that permeate meme dissemination networks. Concurrently, Doe and Jones (2018) delve into the intricate fusion of entertainment and education in digital media, catalyzing a paradigm shift in the consumption and production of scientific knowledge.

In parallel, our inquiry extends to non-fiction works such as "The Science of Memes" by Merrick, which elucidates the cognitive and psychological substrates that underlie the viral proliferation of internet memes, offering a theoretical framework that resonates with the nuances of the 'this is fine' meme's ascendance. Additionally, the treatise "YouTube Science: The Art of Edu-tainment" by Winchester articulates the evolving landscape of science communication in online platforms, imbued with a seamless blend of education and entertainment that mirrors Mould's content.

Transitioning to a more idiosyncratic realm, fiction works with tangential relevance begin to pepper our literary odyssey. The surreal narrative of "Ubiquitous Chaos" by A. Author introduces an absurd world inundated with narratives resembling the nonchalant acceptance encapsulated in the 'this is fine' meme, urging readers to ponder the peculiar allure of resigning to chaotic circumstances. Similarly, the enigmatic tale of "Quantum Entanglement: A Love Story" by P. Writer interweaves whimsy and scientific intrigue, engendering a confluence of themes reminiscent of the interplay between internet memes and educational content.

Moreover, our scholarly traverse encounters the omnipresent influence of key internet memes, including the infamous 'Rickroll' phenomenon and the venerable 'Nyan Cat', which infuse an effervescent aura into our analytical discourse. While seemingly divergent from the central focus of our investigation, these memes invite a lighthearted reflection on the capricious nature of viral content and its entanglement with digital culture.

In unpicking the threads of correlation between the 'this is fine' meme's prominence and the duration of Steve Mould's educational videos, our foray into the literature landscape unfolds with a tapestry of unexpected associations, hinting at the delightful absurdity that permeates our scholarly pursuit. As we step into the realm of statistical inquiry, we endeavor to infuse our rigorous analysis with a touch of humorous whimsy, affirming that even in the pursuit of empirical rigor, room exists for the joyous revelry of internet meme mirth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme and Total length of Steve Mould YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and YouTube . You used data from 2009 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"It's Fine, Lengthen the Variables: Exploring the Link Between the 'this is fine' Meme Popularity and Total Length of Steve Mould YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intriguing confluence of internet meme culture and science communication by investigating the connection between the prevalence of the 'this is fine' meme and the total length of educational YouTube videos by science communicator Steve Mould. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube between 2009 and 2023, our findings revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9625506 and a p-value of less than 0.01, highlighting a robust statistical relationship. We present our statistically significant results with a wry nod to the surreal nature of meme phenomena and the delightful unpredictability in the realm of online content creation. Our study offers playful insights into the unexpected interplay between internet memes and educational content, reminding us that even in the world of empirical inquiry, it's perfectly fine to intersperse a little humor amidst the serious analysis.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In recent years, the internet has become an integral part of modern culture, serving as a platform for the circulation of innumerable memes that capture the zeitgeist of our digital age. Among these memes, the 'this is fine' meme stands out as a particularly enduring and versatile symbol of resigned acceptance amidst chaos and adversity. Its pervasive presence across various online communities has piqued the curiosity of researchers, prompting an exploration into its potential influence on seemingly unrelated domains, such as science communication through online video content.
Simultaneously, the rise of science communicators on digital platforms has revolutionized the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge, often blurring the lines between entertainment and education. Steve Mould, a popular figure in the science communication sphere, has garnered a substantial following on YouTube with his engaging and informative videos, which cover a diverse array of scientific phenomena and principles.
When considering the correlation between the proliferation of the 'this is fine' meme and the total length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos, one might initially perceive a rather perplexing juxtaposition. However, it is within this seemingly incongruous juxtaposition that we uncover an opportunity to unravel the potential interplay between internet meme culture and the production of educational content in the digital realm. As such, this study aims to shed light on the unexpected relationship between the popularity of a meme that portrays nonchalance in the face of calamity and the duration of educational videos aiming to foster curiosity and understanding of scientific concepts.
In navigating this scholarly pursuit, it becomes evident that the merger of internet memes and scientific content creation prompts a profound contemplation of the paradoxical nature of online engagement. While memes often serve as succinct and witty expressions of cultural sentiments, educational videos carry the weight of elucidating complex concepts with veritable depth. This intersection of brevity and depth invites us to explore the nuanced dynamics between the lighthearted nature of viral content and the substantial depth of educational discourse, blurring the boundaries between the whimsical and the erudite.
By ferreting out the statistical relationship between the prevalence of the 'this is fine' meme and the length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos, we endeavor to unravel the peculiar web of connections that exists within the digital sphere. Furthermore, by delving into this uncharted territory, we hope to inject a dash of levity into the often austere realm of scholarly inquiry, proving that even in the pursuit of empirical evidence, there's room for a bit of whimsical wonderment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the purported relationship between the prevalence of the 'this is fine' meme and the total duration of Steve Mould's YouTube videos, a multi-faceted methodological approach was employed. The first step involved the meticulous collection of temporal data regarding the popularity of the meme, which was primarily derived from Google Trends. The search behavior of users over the specified period, spanning from 2009 to 2023, was scrutinized to ascertain the fluctuating waves of 'this is fine' meme appreciation on the digital landscape. It's worth noting that we resisted the temptation to analyze the meme's popularity in real-time, as we wanted to avoid any potential disruptions from unforeseen trends, lest we find ourselves exclaiming "this is not fine" due to data quirks.

Subsequently, the investigation extended to the realm of educational content by Steve Mould, a versatile and erudite science communicator on the YouTube platform. The total length of each video produced by Mould was meticulously cataloged, producing a comprehensive dataset that reflected the rich diversity of scientific topics covered throughout the years. While drowning in hours of particle physics explanations and chemical reactions, it was imperative to maintain a buoyant spirit, lest we sink into the depths of data deluge.

Once the data from these two disparate domains were corralled, a rigorous statistical analysis was enacted to identify any potential correlative patterns. Employing advanced quantitative techniques, such as Spearman's rank correlation and multivariate regression analyses, we endeavored to disentangle the underlying threads connecting the 'this is fine' meme's prevalence and the length of Mould's YouTube videos. As we embarked on this statistical odyssey, we found ourselves navigating the tumultuous seas of data with a resolve as unwavering as that of the meme's stoic dog. At times, the treacherous waves of obscure statistical anomalies threatened to capsize our efforts, but we held fast to the scientific buoyancy of our approach.

Furthermore, albeit less quantifiable, qualitative analyses were incorporated to capture the nuanced intricacies of the 'this is fine' meme's cultural impact and the informative depth of Mould's educational content. Subjective assessments played a pivotal role in discerning the latent humor and intellectual rigor that underlie these respective forms of digital expression. It was incumbent upon us to approach these analyses with a sense of amused impartiality, much like the meme's titular canine who gazes upon chaos with unyielding composure.

Ultimately, the confluence of quantitative and qualitative analyses provided a comprehensive panorama through which we could decipher the enigmatic relationship between internet memes and educational content. The resultant findings led to an illuminating understanding of the surprising interplay between 'this is fine' meme popularity and the total length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos, fostering a newfound appreciation for the whimsical interconnections that permeate the digital landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme and Total length of Steve Mould YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and YouTube .

For the time period 2009 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9625506, r-squared of 0.9265036, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"It's Fine, Lengthen the Variables: Exploring the Link Between the 'this is fine' Meme Popularity and Total Length of Steve Mould YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intriguing confluence of internet meme culture and science communication by investigating the connection between the prevalence of the 'this is fine' meme and the total length of educational YouTube videos by science communicator Steve Mould. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube between 2009 and 2023, our findings revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9625506 and a p-value of less than 0.01, highlighting a robust statistical relationship. We present our statistically significant results with a wry nod to the surreal nature of meme phenomena and the delightful unpredictability in the realm of online content creation. Our study offers playful insights into the unexpected interplay between internet memes and educational content, reminding us that even in the world of empirical inquiry, it's perfectly fine to intersperse a little humor amidst the serious analysis.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In recent years, the internet has become an integral part of modern culture, serving as a platform for the circulation of innumerable memes that capture the zeitgeist of our digital age. Among these memes, the 'this is fine' meme stands out as a particularly enduring and versatile symbol of resigned acceptance amidst chaos and adversity. Its pervasive presence across various online communities has piqued the curiosity of researchers, prompting an exploration into its potential influence on seemingly unrelated domains, such as science communication through online video content.
Simultaneously, the rise of science communicators on digital platforms has revolutionized the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge, often blurring the lines between entertainment and education. Steve Mould, a popular figure in the science communication sphere, has garnered a substantial following on YouTube with his engaging and informative videos, which cover a diverse array of scientific phenomena and principles.
When considering the correlation between the proliferation of the 'this is fine' meme and the total length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos, one might initially perceive a rather perplexing juxtaposition. However, it is within this seemingly incongruous juxtaposition that we uncover an opportunity to unravel the potential interplay between internet meme culture and the production of educational content in the digital realm. As such, this study aims to shed light on the unexpected relationship between the popularity of a meme that portrays nonchalance in the face of calamity and the duration of educational videos aiming to foster curiosity and understanding of scientific concepts.
In navigating this scholarly pursuit, it becomes evident that the merger of internet memes and scientific content creation prompts a profound contemplation of the paradoxical nature of online engagement. While memes often serve as succinct and witty expressions of cultural sentiments, educational videos carry the weight of elucidating complex concepts with veritable depth. This intersection of brevity and depth invites us to explore the nuanced dynamics between the lighthearted nature of viral content and the substantial depth of educational discourse, blurring the boundaries between the whimsical and the erudite.
By ferreting out the statistical relationship between the prevalence of the 'this is fine' meme and the length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos, we endeavor to unravel the peculiar web of connections that exists within the digital sphere. Furthermore, by delving into this uncharted territory, we hope to inject a dash of levity into the often austere realm of scholarly inquiry, proving that even in the pursuit of empirical evidence, there's room for a bit of whimsical wonderment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected to investigate the correlation between the popularity of the 'this is fine' meme and the total length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos yielded an intriguing and statistically significant relationship. Over the time period from 2009 to 2023, the correlation coefficient between these two variables was determined to be 0.9625506, with an r-squared value of 0.9265036, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This remarkably high correlation coefficient signifies a robust positive correlation between the prevalence of the meme and the duration of the educational videos. The scatterplot (Fig. 1) further illustrates this strong positive relationship with utmost clarity, showcasing the synchronous rise and fall of both variables.

The inherent humor of the 'this is fine' meme seamlessly intertwines with the captivating educational content provided by Steve Mould, delineating a peculiar yet compelling entanglement between two seemingly disparate domains. This unexpected convergence invites contemplation on the intertwining of wit and erudition, as the meme's expression of resigned acceptance humorously harmonizes with the comprehensive scientific elucidation presented in Mould's videos. The substantial r-squared value further affirms the robustness of this correlation, indicating that a significant proportion of the variability in the total length of Mould's videos can be explained by the fluctuations in the popularity of the meme.

One cannot help but marvel at the delightful unpredictability inherent in the realm of online content creation. The strikingly high correlation coefficient serves as a testament to the intriguing interplay between internet meme culture and educational content, offering a whimsical twist to the otherwise earnest pursuit of statistical analysis. This discovery underscores the organic convergence of humor and knowledge dissemination in the digital sphere, where the surreal nature of meme phenomena and the meticulous curation of educational content intersect in a peculiar yet harmonious manner.

The statistical findings of this study not only emphasize the substantial correlation between the 'this is fine' meme's prevalence and the total length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos but also serve as a lighthearted reminder that even in the rigorous realm of empirical research, there is ample room for unexpected whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme and Total length of Steve Mould YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"It's Fine, Lengthen the Variables: Exploring the Link Between the 'this is fine' Meme Popularity and Total Length of Steve Mould YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intriguing confluence of internet meme culture and science communication by investigating the connection between the prevalence of the 'this is fine' meme and the total length of educational YouTube videos by science communicator Steve Mould. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube between 2009 and 2023, our findings revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9625506 and a p-value of less than 0.01, highlighting a robust statistical relationship. We present our statistically significant results with a wry nod to the surreal nature of meme phenomena and the delightful unpredictability in the realm of online content creation. Our study offers playful insights into the unexpected interplay between internet memes and educational content, reminding us that even in the world of empirical inquiry, it's perfectly fine to intersperse a little humor amidst the serious analysis.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
When examining the curious nexus between the popularity of the 'this is fine' meme and the total length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos, our investigation revealed a labyrinth of unexpected connections that provoke both scholarly contemplation and whimsical amusement. At the outset, we scrutinize the serious literary tomes that underpin the foundation of our exploratory journey. Smith et al. (2017) offer a meticulous analysis of internet meme propagation dynamics, shedding light on the structural components and cultural significance that permeate meme dissemination networks. Concurrently, Doe and Jones (2018) delve into the intricate fusion of entertainment and education in digital media, catalyzing a paradigm shift in the consumption and production of scientific knowledge.
In parallel, our inquiry extends to non-fiction works such as "The Science of Memes" by Merrick, which elucidates the cognitive and psychological substrates that underlie the viral proliferation of internet memes, offering a theoretical framework that resonates with the nuances of the 'this is fine' meme's ascendance. Additionally, the treatise "YouTube Science: The Art of Edu-tainment" by Winchester articulates the evolving landscape of science communication in online platforms, imbued with a seamless blend of education and entertainment that mirrors Mould's content.
Transitioning to a more idiosyncratic realm, fiction works with tangential relevance begin to pepper our literary odyssey. The surreal narrative of "Ubiquitous Chaos" by A. Author introduces an absurd world inundated with narratives resembling the nonchalant acceptance encapsulated in the 'this is fine' meme, urging readers to ponder the peculiar allure of resigning to chaotic circumstances. Similarly, the enigmatic tale of "Quantum Entanglement: A Love Story" by P. Writer interweaves whimsy and scientific intrigue, engendering a confluence of themes reminiscent of the interplay between internet memes and educational content.
Moreover, our scholarly traverse encounters the omnipresent influence of key internet memes, including the infamous 'Rickroll' phenomenon and the venerable 'Nyan Cat', which infuse an effervescent aura into our analytical discourse. While seemingly divergent from the central focus of our investigation, these memes invite a lighthearted reflection on the capricious nature of viral content and its entanglement with digital culture.
In unpicking the threads of correlation between the 'this is fine' meme's prominence and the duration of Steve Mould's educational videos, our foray into the literature landscape unfolds with a tapestry of unexpected associations, hinting at the delightful absurdity that permeates our scholarly pursuit. As we step into the realm of statistical inquiry, we endeavor to infuse our rigorous analysis with a touch of humorous whimsy, affirming that even in the pursuit of empirical rigor, room exists for the joyous revelry of internet meme mirth.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected to investigate the correlation between the popularity of the 'this is fine' meme and the total length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos yielded an intriguing and statistically significant relationship. Over the time period from 2009 to 2023, the correlation coefficient between these two variables was determined to be 0.9625506, with an r-squared value of 0.9265036, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This remarkably high correlation coefficient signifies a robust positive correlation between the prevalence of the meme and the duration of the educational videos. The scatterplot (Fig. 1) further illustrates this strong positive relationship with utmost clarity, showcasing the synchronous rise and fall of both variables.
The inherent humor of the 'this is fine' meme seamlessly intertwines with the captivating educational content provided by Steve Mould, delineating a peculiar yet compelling entanglement between two seemingly disparate domains. This unexpected convergence invites contemplation on the intertwining of wit and erudition, as the meme's expression of resigned acceptance humorously harmonizes with the comprehensive scientific elucidation presented in Mould's videos. The substantial r-squared value further affirms the robustness of this correlation, indicating that a significant proportion of the variability in the total length of Mould's videos can be explained by the fluctuations in the popularity of the meme.
One cannot help but marvel at the delightful unpredictability inherent in the realm of online content creation. The strikingly high correlation coefficient serves as a testament to the intriguing interplay between internet meme culture and educational content, offering a whimsical twist to the otherwise earnest pursuit of statistical analysis. This discovery underscores the organic convergence of humor and knowledge dissemination in the digital sphere, where the surreal nature of meme phenomena and the meticulous curation of educational content intersect in a peculiar yet harmonious manner.
The statistical findings of this study not only emphasize the substantial correlation between the 'this is fine' meme's prevalence and the total length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos but also serve as a lighthearted reminder that even in the rigorous realm of empirical research, there is ample room for unexpected whimsy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this study offer a captivating revelation, underpinning the unexpectedly strong correlation between the popularity of the 'this is fine' meme and the total length of Steve Mould's educational YouTube videos. Our findings align with prior research that has delved into the intricate fusion of entertainment and education in digital media, as expounded by the scholarly works of Doe and Jones (2018). The robust positive correlation coefficient substantiates the notion that the ascent of the meme coincides with the elongation of Mould's videos, exemplifying the unforeseen intertwining of internet meme culture and science communication.

Furthermore, our results echo the theoretical framework posited by Merrick in "The Science of Memes," elucidating the cognitive and psychological substrates that underlie the contagious dissemination of internet memes. The 'this is fine' meme's prominence mirrors the cognitive engagement inherent in Mould's scientific expositions, reflecting a delightful convergence of resigned humor and erudite elucidation. This unanticipated confluence elucidates the organic entanglement of wit and knowledge dissemination in the digital sphere, resonating with the idiosyncratic landscape depicted in literary works such as "Quantum Entanglement: A Love Story" by P. Writer.

In addition, the statistically significant relationship uncovered in our study aligns with the insights gleaned from Smith et al. (2017), who meticulously analyzed the propagation dynamics of internet memes, shedding light on the cultural significance that permeates meme dissemination networks. The synchronous fluctuation of the meme's prevalence and the duration of Mould's videos unveils a whimsical interplay between digital culture and educational content, affirming the profound influence of internet memes in shaping the landscape of science communication.

It is imperative to underscore the intriguing interplay between humor and scientific exposition that our findings have unearthed. The surreptitious harmony of the 'this is fine' meme's expression of resigned acceptance and Mould's comprehensive scientific elucidation offers a whimsical twist to the otherwise earnest pursuit of statistical analysis. The substantial r-squared value underscores the substantial variability in the total length of Mould's videos that can be explained by the fluctuations in the meme's popularity, reflecting the serendipitous alignment of lighthearted meme culture and erudite discourse.

In conclusion, our study not only substantiates the profound correlation between the prevalence of the 'this is fine' meme and the total length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos but also highlights the delightful unpredictability inherent in the realm of online content creation. This discovery serves as a lighthearted reminder that even in the rigorous realm of empirical research, there is ample room for unexpected whimsy and the surreal interplay of internet meme mirth and educational content elucidation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme and Total length of Steve Mould YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"It's Fine, Lengthen the Variables: Exploring the Link Between the 'this is fine' Meme Popularity and Total Length of Steve Mould YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intriguing confluence of internet meme culture and science communication by investigating the connection between the prevalence of the 'this is fine' meme and the total length of educational YouTube videos by science communicator Steve Mould. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube between 2009 and 2023, our findings revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9625506 and a p-value of less than 0.01, highlighting a robust statistical relationship. We present our statistically significant results with a wry nod to the surreal nature of meme phenomena and the delightful unpredictability in the realm of online content creation. Our study offers playful insights into the unexpected interplay between internet memes and educational content, reminding us that even in the world of empirical inquiry, it's perfectly fine to intersperse a little humor amidst the serious analysis.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In recent years, the internet has become an integral part of modern culture, serving as a platform for the circulation of innumerable memes that capture the zeitgeist of our digital age. Among these memes, the 'this is fine' meme stands out as a particularly enduring and versatile symbol of resigned acceptance amidst chaos and adversity. Its pervasive presence across various online communities has piqued the curiosity of researchers, prompting an exploration into its potential influence on seemingly unrelated domains, such as science communication through online video content.
Simultaneously, the rise of science communicators on digital platforms has revolutionized the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge, often blurring the lines between entertainment and education. Steve Mould, a popular figure in the science communication sphere, has garnered a substantial following on YouTube with his engaging and informative videos, which cover a diverse array of scientific phenomena and principles.
When considering the correlation between the proliferation of the 'this is fine' meme and the total length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos, one might initially perceive a rather perplexing juxtaposition. However, it is within this seemingly incongruous juxtaposition that we uncover an opportunity to unravel the potential interplay between internet meme culture and the production of educational content in the digital realm. As such, this study aims to shed light on the unexpected relationship between the popularity of a meme that portrays nonchalance in the face of calamity and the duration of educational videos aiming to foster curiosity and understanding of scientific concepts.
In navigating this scholarly pursuit, it becomes evident that the merger of internet memes and scientific content creation prompts a profound contemplation of the paradoxical nature of online engagement. While memes often serve as succinct and witty expressions of cultural sentiments, educational videos carry the weight of elucidating complex concepts with veritable depth. This intersection of brevity and depth invites us to explore the nuanced dynamics between the lighthearted nature of viral content and the substantial depth of educational discourse, blurring the boundaries between the whimsical and the erudite.
By ferreting out the statistical relationship between the prevalence of the 'this is fine' meme and the length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos, we endeavor to unravel the peculiar web of connections that exists within the digital sphere. Furthermore, by delving into this uncharted territory, we hope to inject a dash of levity into the often austere realm of scholarly inquiry, proving that even in the pursuit of empirical evidence, there's room for a bit of whimsical wonderment.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected to investigate the correlation between the popularity of the 'this is fine' meme and the total length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos yielded an intriguing and statistically significant relationship. Over the time period from 2009 to 2023, the correlation coefficient between these two variables was determined to be 0.9625506, with an r-squared value of 0.9265036, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This remarkably high correlation coefficient signifies a robust positive correlation between the prevalence of the meme and the duration of the educational videos. The scatterplot (Fig. 1) further illustrates this strong positive relationship with utmost clarity, showcasing the synchronous rise and fall of both variables.
The inherent humor of the 'this is fine' meme seamlessly intertwines with the captivating educational content provided by Steve Mould, delineating a peculiar yet compelling entanglement between two seemingly disparate domains. This unexpected convergence invites contemplation on the intertwining of wit and erudition, as the meme's expression of resigned acceptance humorously harmonizes with the comprehensive scientific elucidation presented in Mould's videos. The substantial r-squared value further affirms the robustness of this correlation, indicating that a significant proportion of the variability in the total length of Mould's videos can be explained by the fluctuations in the popularity of the meme.
One cannot help but marvel at the delightful unpredictability inherent in the realm of online content creation. The strikingly high correlation coefficient serves as a testament to the intriguing interplay between internet meme culture and educational content, offering a whimsical twist to the otherwise earnest pursuit of statistical analysis. This discovery underscores the organic convergence of humor and knowledge dissemination in the digital sphere, where the surreal nature of meme phenomena and the meticulous curation of educational content intersect in a peculiar yet harmonious manner.
The statistical findings of this study not only emphasize the substantial correlation between the 'this is fine' meme's prevalence and the total length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos but also serve as a lighthearted reminder that even in the rigorous realm of empirical research, there is ample room for unexpected whimsy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, this study has elucidated a remarkable and statistically significant correlation between the prevalence of the 'this is fine' meme and the total length of Steve Mould's educational YouTube videos. The strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9625506, coupled with the p-value of less than 0.01, underscores the robustness of this unexpected relationship. It is indeed intriguing to witness the peculiar interplay between online meme culture and the production of informative video content, highlighting the serendipitous synergy between humor and erudition in the digital sphere.

The findings of this research not only contribute to the burgeoning body of knowledge encompassing internet memes and digital content creation but also underscore the delightful unpredictability inherent in the world of empirical inquiry. The juxtaposition of the 'this is fine' meme, portraying nonchalance in the face of calamity, with the substantial depth of educational content offered by Steve Mould, prompts contemplation on the harmonious coexistence of lightheartedness and intellectual enrichment in the online realm.

The whimsical twist uncovered through this investigation serves as a gentle reminder that even in the pursuit of rigorous statistical analysis, there is space for the appreciation of the unexpected and the humorous. As we navigate through the ever-evolving landscape of digital culture, the interweaving of meme phenomena and educational discourse introduces a wry yet delightful nuance to the scholarly pursuit, highlighting the endearing idiosyncrasies that pervade our technological age.

In light of these compelling findings, it becomes evident that the crossroads of internet meme culture and science communication offer a veritable treasure trove of intriguing avenues for exploration. However, it is our firm conviction that this study has provided a robust and comprehensive understanding of the correlation between the 'this is fine' meme's popularity and the total length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos. As such, we assert that no further research is warranted in this particular domain, lest the pursuit of empirical inquiry veer into the realm of meme madness.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited It's Fine, Lengthen the Variables: Exploring the Link Between the 'this is fine' Meme Popularity and Total Length of Steve Mould YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Internet Culture and Digital Media


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited It's Fine, Lengthen the Variables: Exploring the Link Between the 'this is fine' Meme Popularity and Total Length of Steve Mould YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Internet Culture and Media Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled It's Fine, Lengthen the Variables: Exploring the Link Between the 'this is fine' Meme Popularity and Total Length of Steve Mould YouTube Videos with an abstract of In this study, we delved into the intriguing confluence of internet meme culture and science communication by investigating the connection between the prevalence of the 'this is fine' meme and the total length of educational YouTube videos by science communicator Steve Mould. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube between 2009 and 2023, our findings revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9625506 and a p-value of less than 0.01, highlighting a robust statistical relationship. We present our statistically significant results with a wry nod to the surreal nature of meme phenomena and the delightful unpredictability in the realm of online content creation. Our study offers playful insights into the unexpected interplay between internet memes and educational content, reminding us that even in the world of empirical inquiry, it's perfectly fine to intersperse a little humor amidst the serious analysis.

ChatGPT:

'this is fine' meme, Steve Mould, YouTube videos, internet meme culture, science communication, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, statistical relationship, meme phenomena, educational content, online content creation, empirical inquiry, humor in analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'this is fine meme' (without quotes, in the United States)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.

See what else correlates with Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme

Total length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total length of Steve Mould YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Total length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9625506 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9265036 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 92.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme) over the 15 years from 2009 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.6E-9. 0.0000000095864753324632160000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 9.6E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 104,313,626 random variables You don't actually need 104 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.89, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme (Relative popularity)0.71.20.60.1428570.31.666678.8333328.833335.333344.083353.833367.666740.916748.916746
Total length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos (Total length in seconds)15563792050601211911058424770298221300722165160401561814233




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.7,1.2,0.6,0.142857,0.3,1.66667,8.83333,28.8333,35.3333,44.0833,53.8333,67.6667,40.9167,48.9167,46,])
array_2 = np.array([1556,379,205,0,601,2119,1105,8424,7702,9822,13007,22165,16040,15618,14233,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme"
array_2_name = "Total length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 5441 · Black Variable ID: 25144 · Red Variable ID: 25546
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0