about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,410 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina and the second variable is Physical album shipment volume in the United States.  The chart goes from 1999 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

With fewer pollutants in the air, the CDs didn't feel the need to travel by "Air" anymore. They were perfectly content taking the underground "bass"line instead!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image in the style of a retro Polaroid photo capturing the cityscape of Columbia, South Carolina. Show a clear blue sky over the city as it takes strides to reduce air pollution. In contrast, depict a line of CDs traveling underground, symbolizing the decrease in physical album shipments in the United States. Emphasize the connection between the clear sky and the alternative "bass"line transportation while maintaining a vintage and nostalgic feel. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cybernetic art Hyper-realistic a Polaroid photo High-tech Cubism
ChatGPT: a Polaroid photo

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina and Physical album shipment volume in the United States, in the following situation: With fewer pollutants in the air, the CDs didn't feel the need to travel by "Air" anymore. They were perfectly content taking the underground "bass"line instead!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Columbia, South Carolina, the clear blue sky is a welcome change as the city takes steps to reduce air pollution. Meanwhile, in the United States, physical album shipments have decreased as CDs opt to travel by an underground "bass"line, avoiding the need for air transportation.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a Polaroid photo ] and depicting this scene: In Columbia, South Carolina, the clear blue sky is a welcome change as the city takes steps to reduce air pollution. Meanwhile, in the United States, physical album shipments have decreased as CDs opt to travel by an underground "bass"line, avoiding the need for air transportation. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image in the style of a retro Polaroid photo capturing the cityscape of Columbia, South Carolina. Show a clear blue sky over the city as it takes strides to reduce air pollution. In contrast, depict a line of CDs traveling underground, symbolizing the decrease in physical album shipments in the United States. Emphasize the connection between the clear sky and the alternative "bass"line transportation while maintaining a vintage and nostalgic feel.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina caused Physical album shipment volume in the United States to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Breathing in the Beats: A Study on Air Pollution in Columbia, South Carolina and Its Impact on the Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States

Journal of Environmental Beatology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9459888 and p < 0.01 for 1999 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Breathing in the Beats: A Study on Air Pollution in Columbia, South Carolina and Its Impact on the Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the tantalizing correlation between air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina, and the physical album shipment volume in the United States. Our research team took a breath of fresh air from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista to analyze this melodic mystery, and found a correlation coefficient of 0.9459888 and p < 0.01 for the years 1999 to 2022.

Surprisingly, our findings revealed a significant relationship between the level of air pollution in Columbia and the shipment volume of physical albums across the States. It turns out that as the air quality in South Carolina worsened, the shipment volume of physical albums in the United States soared, leaving us in fits of laughter at this unexpected tune! It seems that in the world of music, smoggy air blows a sweet-sounding wind.

In conclusion, our study not only provides a quirky connection between air pollution and music consumption, but also underscores the need for further research into the peculiar harmony between environmental factors and cultural trends. As the old saying goes, "Don't hold your breath, unless it's for a vinyl record delivery!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Breathing in the Beats: A Study on Air Pollution in Columbia, South Carolina and Its Impact on the Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the tantalizing correlation between air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina, and the physical album shipment volume in the United States. Our research team took a breath of fresh air from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista to analyze this melodic mystery, and found a correlation coefficient of 0.9459888 and p < 0.01 for the years 1999 to 2022.

Surprisingly, our findings revealed a significant relationship between the level of air pollution in Columbia and the shipment volume of physical albums across the States. It turns out that as the air quality in South Carolina worsened, the shipment volume of physical albums in the United States soared, leaving us in fits of laughter at this unexpected tune! It seems that in the world of music, smoggy air blows a sweet-sounding wind.

In conclusion, our study not only provides a quirky connection between air pollution and music consumption, but also underscores the need for further research into the peculiar harmony between environmental factors and cultural trends. As the old saying goes, "Don't hold your breath, unless it's for a vinyl record delivery!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the great physicist and occasional bard, Sir Isaac Newton, once said, "Why did the apple fall? To make way for the new hit album!" In the realm of science and research, we often seek to uncover unexpected connections and harmonious relationships amidst the cacophony of data and variables. In this pursuit, we present our unparalleled findings on the unanticipated duet between air pollution in the heart of South Carolina and the physical album shipment volume across the United States.

Like a musical crescendo, our study crescendoed into a symphony of statistics and environmental data to unravel the melodious mystery of how air pollution levels in Columbia, South Carolina, may influence the shipment volume of physical albums in the United States. Our research team serenaded the databases of the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, unveiling a correlation coefficient of 0.9459888 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning from 1999 to 2022, revealing a saga as unexpected as a key change in a symphony.

Upon unearthing this seemingly improbable link, we couldn't help but wonder if we had stumbled upon a dissonant chord amidst the scientific serenade. However, to our simultaneous delight and amusement, our findings struck the perfect note, revealing a resounding relationship between the decline in air quality in Columbia and the soaring shipment volume of physical albums across the States. It seems that smoggy air brings not only a dash of visual haze but also a melodious haze over the music industry.

With a twinkle in our eyes and charts full of surprising data, we embark on this scientific journey, unraveling the melody of air pollution's influence on the record-breaking shipment volumes. It is our hope that these findings not only inspire a few chuckles but also beckon the scientific community to tune into the unique interplay between environmental factors and cultural trends.

As we delve deeper into this unexpected symphony of statistical revelations, we invite you to join us in this playful exploration of the fine-tuned connection between air pollution and music consumption. After all, who knew that "air pollution" and "album revolution" would share such a harmonious melody? Stay tuned for the fascinating tale that follows, and remember, "When it comes to scientific discoveries, it's all about finding the right 'key'!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Breathing in the Beats: A Study on Air Pollution in Columbia, South Carolina and Its Impact on the Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the tantalizing correlation between air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina, and the physical album shipment volume in the United States. Our research team took a breath of fresh air from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista to analyze this melodic mystery, and found a correlation coefficient of 0.9459888 and p < 0.01 for the years 1999 to 2022.

Surprisingly, our findings revealed a significant relationship between the level of air pollution in Columbia and the shipment volume of physical albums across the States. It turns out that as the air quality in South Carolina worsened, the shipment volume of physical albums in the United States soared, leaving us in fits of laughter at this unexpected tune! It seems that in the world of music, smoggy air blows a sweet-sounding wind.

In conclusion, our study not only provides a quirky connection between air pollution and music consumption, but also underscores the need for further research into the peculiar harmony between environmental factors and cultural trends. As the old saying goes, "Don't hold your breath, unless it's for a vinyl record delivery!"

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the great physicist and occasional bard, Sir Isaac Newton, once said, "Why did the apple fall? To make way for the new hit album!" In the realm of science and research, we often seek to uncover unexpected connections and harmonious relationships amidst the cacophony of data and variables. In this pursuit, we present our unparalleled findings on the unanticipated duet between air pollution in the heart of South Carolina and the physical album shipment volume across the United States.
Like a musical crescendo, our study crescendoed into a symphony of statistics and environmental data to unravel the melodious mystery of how air pollution levels in Columbia, South Carolina, may influence the shipment volume of physical albums in the United States. Our research team serenaded the databases of the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, unveiling a correlation coefficient of 0.9459888 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning from 1999 to 2022, revealing a saga as unexpected as a key change in a symphony.
Upon unearthing this seemingly improbable link, we couldn't help but wonder if we had stumbled upon a dissonant chord amidst the scientific serenade. However, to our simultaneous delight and amusement, our findings struck the perfect note, revealing a resounding relationship between the decline in air quality in Columbia and the soaring shipment volume of physical albums across the States. It seems that smoggy air brings not only a dash of visual haze but also a melodious haze over the music industry.
With a twinkle in our eyes and charts full of surprising data, we embark on this scientific journey, unraveling the melody of air pollution's influence on the record-breaking shipment volumes. It is our hope that these findings not only inspire a few chuckles but also beckon the scientific community to tune into the unique interplay between environmental factors and cultural trends.
As we delve deeper into this unexpected symphony of statistical revelations, we invite you to join us in this playful exploration of the fine-tuned connection between air pollution and music consumption. After all, who knew that "air pollution" and "album revolution" would share such a harmonious melody? Stay tuned for the fascinating tale that follows, and remember, "When it comes to scientific discoveries, it's all about finding the right 'key'!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Over the years, numerous studies have delved into the impacts of air pollution on public health, environmental sustainability, and even economic outcomes. In "Air Quality and Economic Growth," Smith et al. (2015) underscore the detrimental effects of air pollutants on economic productivity, shedding light on the far-reaching consequences of poor air quality. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) examine the correlation between air pollution and health outcomes, providing invaluable insights into the pervasive effects of polluted air on human well-being.

It is at this juncture that the study at hand takes an unexpected turn, akin to a surprise key change in a musical composition. As we explore the interplay between air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina, and the shipment volume of physical albums in the United States, our findings strike a chord between seemingly disparate elements. Our research team took a breath of fresh air from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista to analyze this melodic mystery, and found a correlation coefficient of 0.9459888 and p < 0.01 for the years 1999 to 2022.

In the world of academia, it's crucial to hit all the right notes when citing relevant literature. Hence, we nod to non-fiction works such as "Pollution and the Economy" by Green and "Music and the Environment" by Blue, to underscore the interdisciplinary nature of our investigation.

As we waltz through the annals of fiction, we encounter titles that seem to resonate with our curious findings. "The Smog Serenade" by A. Q. Writer and "Airs and Albums" by M. Umeh captivate the imagination with the intriguing juxtaposition of environmental elements and musical motifs. It appears that in the realm of literature, the convergence of air pollution and music exerts a peculiar allure.

And speaking of peculiar allure, let's not forget the internet sensations that parallel our unexpected discovery. The "Smog Symphony" meme captures the essence of our findings, pairing smoke-filled skylines with a whimsical orchestral accompaniment. Furthermore, the "Vinyl Vibes" meme trend celebrates the resurgence of physical music media, aligning seamlessly with our study's focus on album shipment volumes.

In conclusion, our findings not only lend a humorous twist to the serious discourse on air pollution and its influences but also unveil an unexpected harmony between environmental factors and cultural phenomena. As we tiptoe through the convergence of environmental and musical notes, it's clear that this study's resonance extends far beyond the stereos and into the scientific community. After all, when it comes to scientific discoveries, it's all about finding the right 'key' – both metaphorically and musically speaking!

Stay tuned for the surprising revelations that follow, and remember, a little air pollution might just be the unseen conductor of the mesmerizing symphony of physical album shipments.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Statista . You used data from 1999 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Breathing in the Beats: A Study on Air Pollution in Columbia, South Carolina and Its Impact on the Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the tantalizing correlation between air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina, and the physical album shipment volume in the United States. Our research team took a breath of fresh air from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista to analyze this melodic mystery, and found a correlation coefficient of 0.9459888 and p < 0.01 for the years 1999 to 2022.

Surprisingly, our findings revealed a significant relationship between the level of air pollution in Columbia and the shipment volume of physical albums across the States. It turns out that as the air quality in South Carolina worsened, the shipment volume of physical albums in the United States soared, leaving us in fits of laughter at this unexpected tune! It seems that in the world of music, smoggy air blows a sweet-sounding wind.

In conclusion, our study not only provides a quirky connection between air pollution and music consumption, but also underscores the need for further research into the peculiar harmony between environmental factors and cultural trends. As the old saying goes, "Don't hold your breath, unless it's for a vinyl record delivery!"

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the great physicist and occasional bard, Sir Isaac Newton, once said, "Why did the apple fall? To make way for the new hit album!" In the realm of science and research, we often seek to uncover unexpected connections and harmonious relationships amidst the cacophony of data and variables. In this pursuit, we present our unparalleled findings on the unanticipated duet between air pollution in the heart of South Carolina and the physical album shipment volume across the United States.
Like a musical crescendo, our study crescendoed into a symphony of statistics and environmental data to unravel the melodious mystery of how air pollution levels in Columbia, South Carolina, may influence the shipment volume of physical albums in the United States. Our research team serenaded the databases of the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, unveiling a correlation coefficient of 0.9459888 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning from 1999 to 2022, revealing a saga as unexpected as a key change in a symphony.
Upon unearthing this seemingly improbable link, we couldn't help but wonder if we had stumbled upon a dissonant chord amidst the scientific serenade. However, to our simultaneous delight and amusement, our findings struck the perfect note, revealing a resounding relationship between the decline in air quality in Columbia and the soaring shipment volume of physical albums across the States. It seems that smoggy air brings not only a dash of visual haze but also a melodious haze over the music industry.
With a twinkle in our eyes and charts full of surprising data, we embark on this scientific journey, unraveling the melody of air pollution's influence on the record-breaking shipment volumes. It is our hope that these findings not only inspire a few chuckles but also beckon the scientific community to tune into the unique interplay between environmental factors and cultural trends.
As we delve deeper into this unexpected symphony of statistical revelations, we invite you to join us in this playful exploration of the fine-tuned connection between air pollution and music consumption. After all, who knew that "air pollution" and "album revolution" would share such a harmonious melody? Stay tuned for the fascinating tale that follows, and remember, "When it comes to scientific discoveries, it's all about finding the right 'key'!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In our pursuit to understand the jazzy dance between air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina, and the physical album shipment volume in the United States, we employed a combination of scientific whimsy and robust data analytics. Like an alchemist in a musical laboratory, we fused together statistics, environmental metrics, and shipping data to uncover the surprising symphony of this correlation.

Our data collection journey was akin to a treasure hunt, navigating the labyrinth of online repositories with the fervor of a passionate music enthusiast sprinting to the vinyl store. We primarily harnessed the data prowess of the Environmental Protection Agency and the harmonious harmonics of Statista to obtain a comprehensive dataset spanning the years 1999 to 2022. The amalgamation of these sources allowed us to capture the essence of air quality fluctuations in Columbia and the melodious movements in the shipment volume of physical albums across the United States.

To elucidate the lyrical nuances of this relationship, we treated the data with the sensitivity of a skilled violinist caressing the strings of their instrument. We employed sophisticated statistical techniques, including but not limited to correlation analysis, regression modeling, and time series analysis, in a manner that would make even the most seasoned maestro proud. Our statistical toolkit became the orchestral ensemble, harmonizing the variables of air pollution levels with the crescendos and diminuendos of album shipment volumes, resulting in a melodic representation of their interconnectedness.

Moreover, in the spirit of scientific transparency and the occasional dad joke, we took great care to account for potential confounding variables, ensuring that our findings were not mere one-hit wonders. We controlled for factors such as economic trends, music industry innovations, and even the whims of the capricious weather, like a DJ fine-tuning the perfect playlist for a spirited party. This meticulous approach lent nuance and depth to our analysis, much like the subtle interplay of instruments in a well-composed symphony.

Finally, as a whimsical nod to the unpredictability of scientific exploration, we sprinkled a touch of Monte Carlo simulation into our methodological medley. This Monte Carlo simulation effectively added a charming element of chance to our analyses, mimicking the capricious nature of the correlation between air pollution in Columbia and the shipment volume of physical albums in the United States. This lighthearted inclusion served as a playful reminder that even amidst the structured rhythms of scientific inquiry, the occasional improvisation can yield delightful surprises.

In summary, our data collection and analysis waltzed through the corridors of meticulousness and enchantment, culminating in a harmonious cacophony of variables and statistical melodies. With this methodological mixtape in hand, we proceeded to unearth the enchanting connection between air pollution and music shipment volumes, all while ensuring each step was as delightful and awe-inspiring as a lively refrain in a captivating sonata.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Statista .

For the time period 1999 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9459888, r-squared of 0.8948949, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Breathing in the Beats: A Study on Air Pollution in Columbia, South Carolina and Its Impact on the Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the tantalizing correlation between air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina, and the physical album shipment volume in the United States. Our research team took a breath of fresh air from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista to analyze this melodic mystery, and found a correlation coefficient of 0.9459888 and p < 0.01 for the years 1999 to 2022.

Surprisingly, our findings revealed a significant relationship between the level of air pollution in Columbia and the shipment volume of physical albums across the States. It turns out that as the air quality in South Carolina worsened, the shipment volume of physical albums in the United States soared, leaving us in fits of laughter at this unexpected tune! It seems that in the world of music, smoggy air blows a sweet-sounding wind.

In conclusion, our study not only provides a quirky connection between air pollution and music consumption, but also underscores the need for further research into the peculiar harmony between environmental factors and cultural trends. As the old saying goes, "Don't hold your breath, unless it's for a vinyl record delivery!"

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the great physicist and occasional bard, Sir Isaac Newton, once said, "Why did the apple fall? To make way for the new hit album!" In the realm of science and research, we often seek to uncover unexpected connections and harmonious relationships amidst the cacophony of data and variables. In this pursuit, we present our unparalleled findings on the unanticipated duet between air pollution in the heart of South Carolina and the physical album shipment volume across the United States.
Like a musical crescendo, our study crescendoed into a symphony of statistics and environmental data to unravel the melodious mystery of how air pollution levels in Columbia, South Carolina, may influence the shipment volume of physical albums in the United States. Our research team serenaded the databases of the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, unveiling a correlation coefficient of 0.9459888 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning from 1999 to 2022, revealing a saga as unexpected as a key change in a symphony.
Upon unearthing this seemingly improbable link, we couldn't help but wonder if we had stumbled upon a dissonant chord amidst the scientific serenade. However, to our simultaneous delight and amusement, our findings struck the perfect note, revealing a resounding relationship between the decline in air quality in Columbia and the soaring shipment volume of physical albums across the States. It seems that smoggy air brings not only a dash of visual haze but also a melodious haze over the music industry.
With a twinkle in our eyes and charts full of surprising data, we embark on this scientific journey, unraveling the melody of air pollution's influence on the record-breaking shipment volumes. It is our hope that these findings not only inspire a few chuckles but also beckon the scientific community to tune into the unique interplay between environmental factors and cultural trends.
As we delve deeper into this unexpected symphony of statistical revelations, we invite you to join us in this playful exploration of the fine-tuned connection between air pollution and music consumption. After all, who knew that "air pollution" and "album revolution" would share such a harmonious melody? Stay tuned for the fascinating tale that follows, and remember, "When it comes to scientific discoveries, it's all about finding the right 'key'!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In this section, we present the melodious results of our study on the intriguing harmony between air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina, and the physical album shipment volume in the United States. Our research team, armed with statistical instruments and a keen sense of musical humor, unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9459888, an r-squared of 0.8948949, and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1999 to 2022. These robust statistics fortify our symphonic findings, lending a sense of scientific crescendo to our revelatory exploration.

Figure 1 depicts the strong correlation between air pollution in Columbia and the physical album shipment volume in the United States, showcasing the harmonious dance between these seemingly unrelated variables.

It's truly as surprising as finding a rock band performing Mozart - who would've thought that air pollution and a record shipment hike would strike such a chord? Our findings reveal a striking crescendo in the shipment volume of physical albums as the air quality in Columbia took a downward slide.

It's almost as if the smoggy air waves were carrying the tunes of popular albums across the United States, turning a potentially somber environmental situation into a musically delightful revelation.

These results underscore the importance of exploring unconventional connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena, reminding us that in the symphony of scientific discovery, unexpected melodic revelations can emerge from the most unlikely of sources. After all, as the researchers say, "In the world of science, a little music can help clear the air!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Breathing in the Beats: A Study on Air Pollution in Columbia, South Carolina and Its Impact on the Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the tantalizing correlation between air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina, and the physical album shipment volume in the United States. Our research team took a breath of fresh air from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista to analyze this melodic mystery, and found a correlation coefficient of 0.9459888 and p < 0.01 for the years 1999 to 2022.

Surprisingly, our findings revealed a significant relationship between the level of air pollution in Columbia and the shipment volume of physical albums across the States. It turns out that as the air quality in South Carolina worsened, the shipment volume of physical albums in the United States soared, leaving us in fits of laughter at this unexpected tune! It seems that in the world of music, smoggy air blows a sweet-sounding wind.

In conclusion, our study not only provides a quirky connection between air pollution and music consumption, but also underscores the need for further research into the peculiar harmony between environmental factors and cultural trends. As the old saying goes, "Don't hold your breath, unless it's for a vinyl record delivery!"

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Over the years, numerous studies have delved into the impacts of air pollution on public health, environmental sustainability, and even economic outcomes. In "Air Quality and Economic Growth," Smith et al. (2015) underscore the detrimental effects of air pollutants on economic productivity, shedding light on the far-reaching consequences of poor air quality. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) examine the correlation between air pollution and health outcomes, providing invaluable insights into the pervasive effects of polluted air on human well-being.
It is at this juncture that the study at hand takes an unexpected turn, akin to a surprise key change in a musical composition. As we explore the interplay between air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina, and the shipment volume of physical albums in the United States, our findings strike a chord between seemingly disparate elements. Our research team took a breath of fresh air from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista to analyze this melodic mystery, and found a correlation coefficient of 0.9459888 and p < 0.01 for the years 1999 to 2022.
In the world of academia, it's crucial to hit all the right notes when citing relevant literature. Hence, we nod to non-fiction works such as "Pollution and the Economy" by Green and "Music and the Environment" by Blue, to underscore the interdisciplinary nature of our investigation.
As we waltz through the annals of fiction, we encounter titles that seem to resonate with our curious findings. "The Smog Serenade" by A. Q. Writer and "Airs and Albums" by M. Umeh captivate the imagination with the intriguing juxtaposition of environmental elements and musical motifs. It appears that in the realm of literature, the convergence of air pollution and music exerts a peculiar allure.
And speaking of peculiar allure, let's not forget the internet sensations that parallel our unexpected discovery. The "Smog Symphony" meme captures the essence of our findings, pairing smoke-filled skylines with a whimsical orchestral accompaniment. Furthermore, the "Vinyl Vibes" meme trend celebrates the resurgence of physical music media, aligning seamlessly with our study's focus on album shipment volumes.
In conclusion, our findings not only lend a humorous twist to the serious discourse on air pollution and its influences but also unveil an unexpected harmony between environmental factors and cultural phenomena. As we tiptoe through the convergence of environmental and musical notes, it's clear that this study's resonance extends far beyond the stereos and into the scientific community. After all, when it comes to scientific discoveries, it's all about finding the right 'key' – both metaphorically and musically speaking!
Stay tuned for the surprising revelations that follow, and remember, a little air pollution might just be the unseen conductor of the mesmerizing symphony of physical album shipments.

[[RESULTS]]
In this section, we present the melodious results of our study on the intriguing harmony between air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina, and the physical album shipment volume in the United States. Our research team, armed with statistical instruments and a keen sense of musical humor, unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9459888, an r-squared of 0.8948949, and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1999 to 2022. These robust statistics fortify our symphonic findings, lending a sense of scientific crescendo to our revelatory exploration.
Figure 1 depicts the strong correlation between air pollution in Columbia and the physical album shipment volume in the United States, showcasing the harmonious dance between these seemingly unrelated variables.
It's truly as surprising as finding a rock band performing Mozart - who would've thought that air pollution and a record shipment hike would strike such a chord? Our findings reveal a striking crescendo in the shipment volume of physical albums as the air quality in Columbia took a downward slide.
It's almost as if the smoggy air waves were carrying the tunes of popular albums across the United States, turning a potentially somber environmental situation into a musically delightful revelation.
These results underscore the importance of exploring unconventional connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena, reminding us that in the symphony of scientific discovery, unexpected melodic revelations can emerge from the most unlikely of sources. After all, as the researchers say, "In the world of science, a little music can help clear the air!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The harmonious chorus emerging from our study's findings is as uplifting as a spontaneous karaoke session in a traffic jam! Our investigation into the intriguing relationship between air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina, and the physical album shipment volume in the United States struck a chord that reverberates through the scientific community.

Our results harmonize with previous research, echoing the poignant melodies played by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018) in their studies on the far-reaching effects of air pollution. Just as these scholars acknowledged the haunting tune of air pollutants on health and economic productivity, our study adds a quirky note to the melody by revealing the unexpected correlation with music consumption. It's as if a fossil fuel-powered bandwagon rolled through the hallowed halls of academia, bringing with it the irresistible allure of music notes and statistical significance!

What's more, our study's revelation on the surge in physical album shipments as air quality took a nosedive in Columbia is like finding a hidden track on a classic vinyl - unexpected, yet undeniably delightful! It's a bit like discovering a pun in a complicated statistical formula – you can't help but chuckle at the unexpected twist.

The humorous interplay between seemingly dissonant elements, namely air pollution and music consumption, serves as a reminder that in the grand symphony of scientific inquiry, unexpected melodic revelations can emerge from the most unlikely of sources. It's akin to finding a pop song reference in a Mozart concerto – a delightful surprise within the confines of scholarly discourse.

Our study's exploration of this offbeat connection not only adds a new note to the growing chorus of environmental and economic research but also serves as a gentle reminder that science, much like music, thrives on innovation, creativity, and the occasional well-placed dad joke. After all, in the world of science, a little humor can help clear the air almost as effectively as an air purifier!

With the melodic resonance of our findings and the unexpected harmonies that have emerged from our study, we invite the scientific community to join us in a jovial round of applause for the delightful tunes that science can uncover. As we eagerly anticipate the rhapsodic implications of our study, it's clear that in the realm of academic research, "A little air pollution might just be the unseen conductor of the mesmerizing symphony of physical album shipments!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Breathing in the Beats: A Study on Air Pollution in Columbia, South Carolina and Its Impact on the Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the tantalizing correlation between air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina, and the physical album shipment volume in the United States. Our research team took a breath of fresh air from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista to analyze this melodic mystery, and found a correlation coefficient of 0.9459888 and p < 0.01 for the years 1999 to 2022.

Surprisingly, our findings revealed a significant relationship between the level of air pollution in Columbia and the shipment volume of physical albums across the States. It turns out that as the air quality in South Carolina worsened, the shipment volume of physical albums in the United States soared, leaving us in fits of laughter at this unexpected tune! It seems that in the world of music, smoggy air blows a sweet-sounding wind.

In conclusion, our study not only provides a quirky connection between air pollution and music consumption, but also underscores the need for further research into the peculiar harmony between environmental factors and cultural trends. As the old saying goes, "Don't hold your breath, unless it's for a vinyl record delivery!"

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the great physicist and occasional bard, Sir Isaac Newton, once said, "Why did the apple fall? To make way for the new hit album!" In the realm of science and research, we often seek to uncover unexpected connections and harmonious relationships amidst the cacophony of data and variables. In this pursuit, we present our unparalleled findings on the unanticipated duet between air pollution in the heart of South Carolina and the physical album shipment volume across the United States.
Like a musical crescendo, our study crescendoed into a symphony of statistics and environmental data to unravel the melodious mystery of how air pollution levels in Columbia, South Carolina, may influence the shipment volume of physical albums in the United States. Our research team serenaded the databases of the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, unveiling a correlation coefficient of 0.9459888 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning from 1999 to 2022, revealing a saga as unexpected as a key change in a symphony.
Upon unearthing this seemingly improbable link, we couldn't help but wonder if we had stumbled upon a dissonant chord amidst the scientific serenade. However, to our simultaneous delight and amusement, our findings struck the perfect note, revealing a resounding relationship between the decline in air quality in Columbia and the soaring shipment volume of physical albums across the States. It seems that smoggy air brings not only a dash of visual haze but also a melodious haze over the music industry.
With a twinkle in our eyes and charts full of surprising data, we embark on this scientific journey, unraveling the melody of air pollution's influence on the record-breaking shipment volumes. It is our hope that these findings not only inspire a few chuckles but also beckon the scientific community to tune into the unique interplay between environmental factors and cultural trends.
As we delve deeper into this unexpected symphony of statistical revelations, we invite you to join us in this playful exploration of the fine-tuned connection between air pollution and music consumption. After all, who knew that "air pollution" and "album revolution" would share such a harmonious melody? Stay tuned for the fascinating tale that follows, and remember, "When it comes to scientific discoveries, it's all about finding the right 'key'!"

[[RESULTS]]
In this section, we present the melodious results of our study on the intriguing harmony between air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina, and the physical album shipment volume in the United States. Our research team, armed with statistical instruments and a keen sense of musical humor, unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9459888, an r-squared of 0.8948949, and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1999 to 2022. These robust statistics fortify our symphonic findings, lending a sense of scientific crescendo to our revelatory exploration.
Figure 1 depicts the strong correlation between air pollution in Columbia and the physical album shipment volume in the United States, showcasing the harmonious dance between these seemingly unrelated variables.
It's truly as surprising as finding a rock band performing Mozart - who would've thought that air pollution and a record shipment hike would strike such a chord? Our findings reveal a striking crescendo in the shipment volume of physical albums as the air quality in Columbia took a downward slide.
It's almost as if the smoggy air waves were carrying the tunes of popular albums across the United States, turning a potentially somber environmental situation into a musically delightful revelation.
These results underscore the importance of exploring unconventional connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena, reminding us that in the symphony of scientific discovery, unexpected melodic revelations can emerge from the most unlikely of sources. After all, as the researchers say, "In the world of science, a little music can help clear the air!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the grand finale of our whimsical exploration, we find ourselves in awe of the unexpected harmony between air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina, and the shipment volume of physical albums in the United States. It seems that when it comes to music, even the air quality wants to join in on the melody! Our findings have not only struck a chord but also left us breathless with laughter, as we never anticipated such a lively duet between these variables. It's almost as surprising as a dad joke about jazz - you never "sax"pect it!

As our study draws to a close, we believe it's time to declare that no further research is needed in this area. We've hit the high note on this unusual correlation, and it's as clear as a crisp vinyl record playing in the breeze. So, let's put a pin in it and savor this symphony of statistical revelations – after all, as they say in the research world, "Why write a symphony when you can just publish a paper instead?" There you have it – case closed, like a vinyl record after it's been played one too many times!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Breathing in the Beats: A Study on Air Pollution in Columbia, South Carolina and Its Impact on the Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Environmental Beatology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Breathing in the Beats: A Study on Air Pollution in Columbia, South Carolina and Its Impact on the Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Sound Ecology and Atmospheric Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Breathing in the Beats: A Study on Air Pollution in Columbia, South Carolina and Its Impact on the Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States with an abstract of In this study, we delved into the tantalizing correlation between air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina, and the physical album shipment volume in the United States. Our research team took a breath of fresh air from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista to analyze this melodic mystery, and found a correlation coefficient of 0.9459888 and p < 0.01 for the years 1999 to 2022.
Surprisingly, our findings revealed a significant relationship between the level of air pollution in Columbia and the shipment volume of physical albums across the States. It turns out that as the air quality in South Carolina worsened, the shipment volume of physical albums in the United States soared, leaving us in fits of laughter at this unexpected tune! It seems that in the world of music, smoggy air blows a sweet-sounding wind.
In conclusion, our study not only provides a quirky connection between air pollution and music consumption, but also underscores the need for further research into the peculiar harmony between environmental factors and cultural trends. As the old saying goes, "Don't hold your breath, unless it's for a vinyl record delivery!

ChatGPT:

air pollution, Columbia South Carolina, physical album shipment volume, United States, correlation, environmental factors, cultural trends

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Columbia, SC
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina

Physical album shipment volume in the United States
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Physical album shipment volume in the United States

Correlation r = 0.9459888 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8948949 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 89.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Physical album shipment volume in the United States) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina) over the 24 years from 1999 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.06E-12. 0.0000000000030596336360695507
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 3.06E-10% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 326,836,516,703 random variables You don't actually need 326 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 23 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 23 because we have two variables measured over a period of 24 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.88, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina (Bad air quality days)14.520515.84713.424712.32886.575349.562846.575347.945217.945215.73770.2739731.643845.753420.8196720001.366120.5479450.27397300.2732240.5479450
Physical album shipment volume in the United States (Units)93890000094250000088190000080330000074600000076700000070540000061970000051110000036840000029290000025300000024080000019820000017220000014280000012290000097600000877000005200000047500000316000004670000033400000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([14.5205,15.847,13.4247,12.3288,6.57534,9.56284,6.57534,7.94521,7.94521,5.7377,0.273973,1.64384,5.75342,0.819672,0,0,0,1.36612,0.547945,0.273973,0,0.273224,0.547945,0,])
array_2 = np.array([938900000,942500000,881900000,803300000,746000000,767000000,705400000,619700000,511100000,368400000,292900000,253000000,240800000,198200000,172200000,142800000,122900000,97600000,87700000,52000000,47500000,31600000,46700000,33400000,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Columbia, South Carolina"
array_2_name = "Physical album shipment volume in the United States"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 5410 · Black Variable ID: 20486 · Red Variable ID: 155
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0