about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,252 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in Mississippi and the second variable is How trendy The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As GMO cotton in Mississippi flourished, it led to a surplus of cotton which in turn boosted the production of snazzy cotton-based clothing. The Game Theorists, wanting to stay fashion-forward, couldn't help but up their video title game to match the sudden influx of stylish GMO cotton clothing options on the market. Who knew that sartorial decisions in the South could influence YouTube trends?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image in the style of cutsy graphics portraying workers in a genetically modified cotton field alongside a bustling store front featuring trendy clothing made from the surplus of cotton. Show a sleek office with people brainstorming video titles inspired by the fashionable cotton-based clothing in the market. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in Mississippi and How trendy The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy graphics inspired by bauhaus Low poly Macabre Art nouveau
ChatGPT: Cutsy graphics

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in Mississippi and How trendy The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are, in the following situation: As GMO cotton in Mississippi flourished, it led to a surplus of cotton which in turn boosted the production of snazzy cotton-based clothing. The Game Theorists, wanting to stay fashion-forward, couldn't help but up their video title game to match the sudden influx of stylish GMO cotton clothing options on the market. Who knew that sartorial decisions in the South could influence YouTube trends?. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A thriving field of genetically modified cotton stretches across the Mississippi landscape, as workers bustlingly harvest the abundant crop. In a nearby town, a storefront proudly displays trendy clothing made from the surplus of GMO cotton, attracting fashion-conscious locals. Meanwhile, in a sleek office, The Game Theorists brainstorm new video titles, incorporating stylish references inspired by the influx of fashionable cotton-based clothing in the market.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cutsy graphics ] and depicting this scene: A thriving field of genetically modified cotton stretches across the Mississippi landscape, as workers bustlingly harvest the abundant crop. In a nearby town, a storefront proudly displays trendy clothing made from the surplus of GMO cotton, attracting fashion-conscious locals. Meanwhile, in a sleek office, The Game Theorists brainstorm new video titles, incorporating stylish references inspired by the influx of fashionable cotton-based clothing in the market. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image in the style of cutsy graphics portraying workers in a genetically modified cotton field alongside a bustling store front featuring trendy clothing made from the surplus of cotton. Show a sleek office with people brainstorming video titles inspired by the fashionable cotton-based clothing in the market.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in cotton in Mississippi caused How trendy The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Cotton Gin-novation: How GMO Cotton Cultivation in Mississippi is Sewing Up The Game Theorists

Journal of Agricultural Innovations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Mississippi and How trendy The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and AI analysis of YouTube video titles to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9469388 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Cotton Gin-novation: How GMO Cotton Cultivation in Mississippi is "Sewing" Up The Game Theorists

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the intriguing connection between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Mississippi and the trendiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. Utilizing data from the USDA on cotton cultivation and AI analysis of YouTube video titles, we sought to understand if there is a relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Surprisingly, our findings unveiled a strong positive correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9469388 and p < 0.01 from 2009 to 2022. Our research sheds light on the unanticipated entanglement of agricultural practices and internet culture, "seeding" a new area of interdisciplinary inquiry. As we delve into the "theoretics" behind this phenomenon, we also share a few lighthearted dad jokes to "crop" up the reader's interest.

For example:
Why did the game theorist bring a ladder to the cotton field? Because he wanted to reach the high levels of cotton cultivation, just like his video titles!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Mississippi and How trendy The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cotton Gin-novation: How GMO Cotton Cultivation in Mississippi is "Sewing" Up The Game Theorists

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the intriguing connection between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Mississippi and the trendiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. Utilizing data from the USDA on cotton cultivation and AI analysis of YouTube video titles, we sought to understand if there is a relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Surprisingly, our findings unveiled a strong positive correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9469388 and p < 0.01 from 2009 to 2022. Our research sheds light on the unanticipated entanglement of agricultural practices and internet culture, "seeding" a new area of interdisciplinary inquiry. As we delve into the "theoretics" behind this phenomenon, we also share a few lighthearted dad jokes to "crop" up the reader's interest.

For example:
Why did the game theorist bring a ladder to the cotton field? Because he wanted to reach the high levels of cotton cultivation, just like his video titles!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As our society becomes increasingly interconnected, the lines between disparate fields of study continue to blur, much like how the lines on a cotton fabric blur under careful examination. In this paper, we unveil a surprising connection between GMO cotton cultivation in Mississippi and the trendiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. While this correlation may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a haystack, our findings suggest a strong positive relationship, highlighting the unexpected interplay between agriculture and internet subculture.

Diving into the world of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), we encounter a rich tapestry of scientific innovation, agricultural practices, and polarizing debates. The adoption of GMO cotton in Mississippi represents a "thread" in the larger fabric of agricultural advancements, contributing to increased productivity and pest resistance. But how does this "g-emo-tionally" charged topic intersect with the realm of internet content creation? Well, just like a well-stitched seam, our research unravels the intricate connections between these seemingly unrelated areas.

Speaking of unraveling, have you heard the joke about the cotton farmer? He always "planted" jokes while working in the fields because he liked to "cultivate" humor along with his crops!

The Game Theorists, a popular YouTube channel delving into the analytical depths of video games and pop culture, have garnered a substantial following with their thought-provoking content. However, it is their video titles that piqued our curiosity. "Leveling up" from mere observations to data analysis, we meticulously examined the trends in their video titles to uncover any discernible patterns or links to cotton cultivation. The results left our research team "spun" around in surprise, as the correlation between the two variables emerged as clear as a well-ironed shirt.

Why did the cotton farmer use a computer? Because he wanted to keep up with the latest cotton-tivation methods and the most current video title trends like a "ginnovative" farmer!

Anchoring our inquiry in rigorous statistical analysis, we navigated through the labyrinth of data points to unearth this unexpected relationship. The correlation coefficient of 0.9469388 serves as a solid testament to the strength of the connection, leaving statistical significance as undeniable as the ever-present lint on freshly picked cotton.

In our journey to untangle this curious web of associations, we also aim to add a touch of lightheartedness to our scholarly pursuits. After all, what's research without a sprinkling of unexpected humor to "spin" things around?

How does a cotton farmer end a conversation? He "bales" out with a witty punchline!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Mississippi and How trendy The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cotton Gin-novation: How GMO Cotton Cultivation in Mississippi is "Sewing" Up The Game Theorists

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the intriguing connection between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Mississippi and the trendiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. Utilizing data from the USDA on cotton cultivation and AI analysis of YouTube video titles, we sought to understand if there is a relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Surprisingly, our findings unveiled a strong positive correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9469388 and p < 0.01 from 2009 to 2022. Our research sheds light on the unanticipated entanglement of agricultural practices and internet culture, "seeding" a new area of interdisciplinary inquiry. As we delve into the "theoretics" behind this phenomenon, we also share a few lighthearted dad jokes to "crop" up the reader's interest.

For example:
Why did the game theorist bring a ladder to the cotton field? Because he wanted to reach the high levels of cotton cultivation, just like his video titles!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As our society becomes increasingly interconnected, the lines between disparate fields of study continue to blur, much like how the lines on a cotton fabric blur under careful examination. In this paper, we unveil a surprising connection between GMO cotton cultivation in Mississippi and the trendiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. While this correlation may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a haystack, our findings suggest a strong positive relationship, highlighting the unexpected interplay between agriculture and internet subculture.
Diving into the world of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), we encounter a rich tapestry of scientific innovation, agricultural practices, and polarizing debates. The adoption of GMO cotton in Mississippi represents a "thread" in the larger fabric of agricultural advancements, contributing to increased productivity and pest resistance. But how does this "g-emo-tionally" charged topic intersect with the realm of internet content creation? Well, just like a well-stitched seam, our research unravels the intricate connections between these seemingly unrelated areas.
Speaking of unraveling, have you heard the joke about the cotton farmer? He always "planted" jokes while working in the fields because he liked to "cultivate" humor along with his crops!
The Game Theorists, a popular YouTube channel delving into the analytical depths of video games and pop culture, have garnered a substantial following with their thought-provoking content. However, it is their video titles that piqued our curiosity. "Leveling up" from mere observations to data analysis, we meticulously examined the trends in their video titles to uncover any discernible patterns or links to cotton cultivation. The results left our research team "spun" around in surprise, as the correlation between the two variables emerged as clear as a well-ironed shirt.
Why did the cotton farmer use a computer? Because he wanted to keep up with the latest cotton-tivation methods and the most current video title trends like a "ginnovative" farmer!
Anchoring our inquiry in rigorous statistical analysis, we navigated through the labyrinth of data points to unearth this unexpected relationship. The correlation coefficient of 0.9469388 serves as a solid testament to the strength of the connection, leaving statistical significance as undeniable as the ever-present lint on freshly picked cotton.
In our journey to untangle this curious web of associations, we also aim to add a touch of lightheartedness to our scholarly pursuits. After all, what's research without a sprinkling of unexpected humor to "spin" things around?
How does a cotton farmer end a conversation? He "bales" out with a witty punchline!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The groundbreaking study by Smith et al. (2015) delved into the economic impacts of GMO cotton cultivation in the southern United States, highlighting its contribution to increased yields and reduced pesticide usage. Similarly, Doe's (2018) examination of the environmental effects of GMO cotton underscored its potential to mitigate the ecological footprint of traditional cotton farming. These seminal works laid the foundation for understanding the multifaceted implications of GMO cotton adoption, paving the way for our interdisciplinary investigation.

But cotton, you believe it or not, the correlation between GMO cotton and YouTube video titles doesn't stop there! In "The Cotton Chronicles: A Historical Analysis," Lorem and Ipsum (2007) traced the evolution of cotton cultivation, weaving a narrative that echoes both agricultural innovation and cultural relevance. This book truly stitches together the rich tapestry of cotton's impact, just as our research seeks to interweave the threads of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

Now, turning to the fictional realm, "The Cotton Conspiracy" by Jane Jones and "GMOs: A Tale of Modification" by John Smith might seem like works of fiction, but their exploration of genetically modified crops and agricultural intrigue resonates with the very essence of our study. After all, who's to say that whimsical literature and rigorous research can't be peas in a pod?

In a surprising turn of events, a recent social media post by @GameTheoryFanatic101 on Twitter posed an unexpected conjecture about the correlation between GMO cotton and The Game Theorists' video titles. The post garnered substantial attention, generating a flurry of speculation and hypotheses that poked fun at the unlikely connection. While the post's comedic tone lightened the discourse, it also seeded curiosity, akin to the "cotton" of our approach. After all, who knew that internet subculture and agricultural practices could be "sew" closely entwined?

Did you hear about the cotton farmer who became a YouTube sensation? He was a real influencer, always sharing "top-seed" tips for successful cotton cultivation while keeping up with the latest video title trends!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Mississippi and How trendy The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and AI analysis of YouTube video titles . You used data from 2009 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cotton Gin-novation: How GMO Cotton Cultivation in Mississippi is "Sewing" Up The Game Theorists

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the intriguing connection between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Mississippi and the trendiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. Utilizing data from the USDA on cotton cultivation and AI analysis of YouTube video titles, we sought to understand if there is a relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Surprisingly, our findings unveiled a strong positive correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9469388 and p < 0.01 from 2009 to 2022. Our research sheds light on the unanticipated entanglement of agricultural practices and internet culture, "seeding" a new area of interdisciplinary inquiry. As we delve into the "theoretics" behind this phenomenon, we also share a few lighthearted dad jokes to "crop" up the reader's interest.

For example:
Why did the game theorist bring a ladder to the cotton field? Because he wanted to reach the high levels of cotton cultivation, just like his video titles!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As our society becomes increasingly interconnected, the lines between disparate fields of study continue to blur, much like how the lines on a cotton fabric blur under careful examination. In this paper, we unveil a surprising connection between GMO cotton cultivation in Mississippi and the trendiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. While this correlation may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a haystack, our findings suggest a strong positive relationship, highlighting the unexpected interplay between agriculture and internet subculture.
Diving into the world of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), we encounter a rich tapestry of scientific innovation, agricultural practices, and polarizing debates. The adoption of GMO cotton in Mississippi represents a "thread" in the larger fabric of agricultural advancements, contributing to increased productivity and pest resistance. But how does this "g-emo-tionally" charged topic intersect with the realm of internet content creation? Well, just like a well-stitched seam, our research unravels the intricate connections between these seemingly unrelated areas.
Speaking of unraveling, have you heard the joke about the cotton farmer? He always "planted" jokes while working in the fields because he liked to "cultivate" humor along with his crops!
The Game Theorists, a popular YouTube channel delving into the analytical depths of video games and pop culture, have garnered a substantial following with their thought-provoking content. However, it is their video titles that piqued our curiosity. "Leveling up" from mere observations to data analysis, we meticulously examined the trends in their video titles to uncover any discernible patterns or links to cotton cultivation. The results left our research team "spun" around in surprise, as the correlation between the two variables emerged as clear as a well-ironed shirt.
Why did the cotton farmer use a computer? Because he wanted to keep up with the latest cotton-tivation methods and the most current video title trends like a "ginnovative" farmer!
Anchoring our inquiry in rigorous statistical analysis, we navigated through the labyrinth of data points to unearth this unexpected relationship. The correlation coefficient of 0.9469388 serves as a solid testament to the strength of the connection, leaving statistical significance as undeniable as the ever-present lint on freshly picked cotton.
In our journey to untangle this curious web of associations, we also aim to add a touch of lightheartedness to our scholarly pursuits. After all, what's research without a sprinkling of unexpected humor to "spin" things around?
How does a cotton farmer end a conversation? He "bales" out with a witty punchline!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To understand the linkage between GMO cotton cultivation in Mississippi and the trendiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles, our research employed a multifaceted approach that was as intricate as the weaving of a complex algorithm. First, we gathered historical data on GMO cotton cultivation in Mississippi from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to meticulously track the adoption and spread of genetically modified cotton across the state. Our research team dug into the data like a determined archaeologist, brushing away the layers of statistical soil to reveal the underlying patterns.

We then "planted" ourselves into the internet landscape, utilizing advanced AI algorithms to analyze the trends in The Game Theorists' video titles from 2009 to 2022. This involved sifting through a vast "field" of video titles, akin to picking out the choicest cotton bolls from a sprawling plantation, to identify any recurring themes or motifs associated with the semantic content. With each click and keystroke, we delved into the digital "soil" of internet culture to extract valuable insights.

Furthermore, to investigate the potential causality and directionality of the relationship between GMO cotton cultivation and The Game Theorists' video titles, our team explored possible influencing factors through a series of in-depth interviews with experts in agricultural science and internet subcultures. These interviews were as illuminating as a field bathed in sunlight, shedding light on the nuances of cotton cultivation practices and the dynamics of YouTube content creation.

Additionally, to capture the temporal dynamics of the relationship, we ventured into the realm of time-series analysis, employing sophisticated statistical methods to unravel the evolving patterns between the variables over the 13-year period. This involved employing autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models and other time-series techniques, which were as intricate as unraveling a complex knot to reveal the underlying threads of statistical association.

Lastly, as an unconventional yet insightful component of our methodology, we monitored the personal social media accounts of The Game Theorists' hosts for any cryptic references to cotton cultivation or agricultural practices. Although slightly unorthodox, this approach allowed us to gain a deeper understanding of the potential influence of personal interests on video content creation, adding a touch of whimsy to our research endeavors.

In the spirit of "threading" together diverse sources of information, our methodology aimed to "stitch" together a comprehensive understanding of the unexpected intertwining of GMO cotton cultivation in Mississippi and the captivating allure of The Game Theorists' video titles. By embracing unconventional approaches and incorporating a sprinkle of humor, our research method aspired to be as engaging and dynamic as the fields of cotton "cultivated" in the Mississippi delta.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Mississippi and How trendy The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and AI analysis of YouTube video titles .

For the time period 2009 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9469388, r-squared of 0.8966931, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cotton Gin-novation: How GMO Cotton Cultivation in Mississippi is "Sewing" Up The Game Theorists

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the intriguing connection between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Mississippi and the trendiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. Utilizing data from the USDA on cotton cultivation and AI analysis of YouTube video titles, we sought to understand if there is a relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Surprisingly, our findings unveiled a strong positive correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9469388 and p < 0.01 from 2009 to 2022. Our research sheds light on the unanticipated entanglement of agricultural practices and internet culture, "seeding" a new area of interdisciplinary inquiry. As we delve into the "theoretics" behind this phenomenon, we also share a few lighthearted dad jokes to "crop" up the reader's interest.

For example:
Why did the game theorist bring a ladder to the cotton field? Because he wanted to reach the high levels of cotton cultivation, just like his video titles!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As our society becomes increasingly interconnected, the lines between disparate fields of study continue to blur, much like how the lines on a cotton fabric blur under careful examination. In this paper, we unveil a surprising connection between GMO cotton cultivation in Mississippi and the trendiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. While this correlation may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a haystack, our findings suggest a strong positive relationship, highlighting the unexpected interplay between agriculture and internet subculture.
Diving into the world of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), we encounter a rich tapestry of scientific innovation, agricultural practices, and polarizing debates. The adoption of GMO cotton in Mississippi represents a "thread" in the larger fabric of agricultural advancements, contributing to increased productivity and pest resistance. But how does this "g-emo-tionally" charged topic intersect with the realm of internet content creation? Well, just like a well-stitched seam, our research unravels the intricate connections between these seemingly unrelated areas.
Speaking of unraveling, have you heard the joke about the cotton farmer? He always "planted" jokes while working in the fields because he liked to "cultivate" humor along with his crops!
The Game Theorists, a popular YouTube channel delving into the analytical depths of video games and pop culture, have garnered a substantial following with their thought-provoking content. However, it is their video titles that piqued our curiosity. "Leveling up" from mere observations to data analysis, we meticulously examined the trends in their video titles to uncover any discernible patterns or links to cotton cultivation. The results left our research team "spun" around in surprise, as the correlation between the two variables emerged as clear as a well-ironed shirt.
Why did the cotton farmer use a computer? Because he wanted to keep up with the latest cotton-tivation methods and the most current video title trends like a "ginnovative" farmer!
Anchoring our inquiry in rigorous statistical analysis, we navigated through the labyrinth of data points to unearth this unexpected relationship. The correlation coefficient of 0.9469388 serves as a solid testament to the strength of the connection, leaving statistical significance as undeniable as the ever-present lint on freshly picked cotton.
In our journey to untangle this curious web of associations, we also aim to add a touch of lightheartedness to our scholarly pursuits. After all, what's research without a sprinkling of unexpected humor to "spin" things around?
How does a cotton farmer end a conversation? He "bales" out with a witty punchline!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Mississippi and the trendiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. The correlation coefficient of 0.9469388 underscored the unexpected intertwining of these seemingly disparate variables, akin to finding a rare collectible item in a virtual game.

The obtained r-squared value of 0.8966931 further emphasized the robustness of this relationship, signifying that approximately 89.67% of the variability in the trendiness of YouTube video titles can be explained by the adoption of GMO cotton cultivation in Mississippi. This level of explanatory power is quite astounding, much like discovering a hidden pathway in a complex video game world.

The statistical significance of the correlation, with a p-value less than 0.01, alludes to the fact that this relationship is not by mere chance but holds substantial weight in our findings. These results resonate as strongly as an expertly crafted cotton bale, promising a "baleful" impact on the perceptions of the relationship between agriculture and digital content creation.

Not to "bale" on our readers, here's a cotton-themed dad joke for a bit of levity: Why did the cotton farmer see a therapist? Because he was having "baleful" thoughts about his crop's future!

Please refer to Fig. 1 for a visual representation of this remarkable correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Mississippi and How trendy The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Cotton Gin-novation: How GMO Cotton Cultivation in Mississippi is "Sewing" Up The Game Theorists

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the intriguing connection between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Mississippi and the trendiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. Utilizing data from the USDA on cotton cultivation and AI analysis of YouTube video titles, we sought to understand if there is a relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Surprisingly, our findings unveiled a strong positive correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9469388 and p < 0.01 from 2009 to 2022. Our research sheds light on the unanticipated entanglement of agricultural practices and internet culture, "seeding" a new area of interdisciplinary inquiry. As we delve into the "theoretics" behind this phenomenon, we also share a few lighthearted dad jokes to "crop" up the reader's interest.

For example:
Why did the game theorist bring a ladder to the cotton field? Because he wanted to reach the high levels of cotton cultivation, just like his video titles!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The groundbreaking study by Smith et al. (2015) delved into the economic impacts of GMO cotton cultivation in the southern United States, highlighting its contribution to increased yields and reduced pesticide usage. Similarly, Doe's (2018) examination of the environmental effects of GMO cotton underscored its potential to mitigate the ecological footprint of traditional cotton farming. These seminal works laid the foundation for understanding the multifaceted implications of GMO cotton adoption, paving the way for our interdisciplinary investigation.
But cotton, you believe it or not, the correlation between GMO cotton and YouTube video titles doesn't stop there! In "The Cotton Chronicles: A Historical Analysis," Lorem and Ipsum (2007) traced the evolution of cotton cultivation, weaving a narrative that echoes both agricultural innovation and cultural relevance. This book truly stitches together the rich tapestry of cotton's impact, just as our research seeks to interweave the threads of seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Now, turning to the fictional realm, "The Cotton Conspiracy" by Jane Jones and "GMOs: A Tale of Modification" by John Smith might seem like works of fiction, but their exploration of genetically modified crops and agricultural intrigue resonates with the very essence of our study. After all, who's to say that whimsical literature and rigorous research can't be peas in a pod?
In a surprising turn of events, a recent social media post by @GameTheoryFanatic101 on Twitter posed an unexpected conjecture about the correlation between GMO cotton and The Game Theorists' video titles. The post garnered substantial attention, generating a flurry of speculation and hypotheses that poked fun at the unlikely connection. While the post's comedic tone lightened the discourse, it also seeded curiosity, akin to the "cotton" of our approach. After all, who knew that internet subculture and agricultural practices could be "sew" closely entwined?
Did you hear about the cotton farmer who became a YouTube sensation? He was a real influencer, always sharing "top-seed" tips for successful cotton cultivation while keeping up with the latest video title trends!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Mississippi and the trendiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. The correlation coefficient of 0.9469388 underscored the unexpected intertwining of these seemingly disparate variables, akin to finding a rare collectible item in a virtual game.
The obtained r-squared value of 0.8966931 further emphasized the robustness of this relationship, signifying that approximately 89.67% of the variability in the trendiness of YouTube video titles can be explained by the adoption of GMO cotton cultivation in Mississippi. This level of explanatory power is quite astounding, much like discovering a hidden pathway in a complex video game world.
The statistical significance of the correlation, with a p-value less than 0.01, alludes to the fact that this relationship is not by mere chance but holds substantial weight in our findings. These results resonate as strongly as an expertly crafted cotton bale, promising a "baleful" impact on the perceptions of the relationship between agriculture and digital content creation.
Not to "bale" on our readers, here's a cotton-themed dad joke for a bit of levity: Why did the cotton farmer see a therapist? Because he was having "baleful" thoughts about his crop's future!
Please refer to Fig. 1 for a visual representation of this remarkable correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The unprecedented correlation uncovered between genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Mississippi and the trendiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles has left researchers both intrigued and bemused. This unexpected association challenges conventional wisdom, akin to discovering an Easter egg in a game that leads to a surprising revelation.

Building upon prior research, we corroborated the economic and environmental benefits of GMO cotton cultivation, as demonstrated by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe (2018). This further highlights the positive implications of our findings, akin to achieving a high score in a challenging game level. Moreover, the intertwining of folklore, as evidenced in the historical analysis by Lorem and Ipsum (2007) and works of fiction such as "The Cotton Conspiracy" and "GMOs: A Tale of Modification," accentuates the diverse layers of our study as it intertwines with cultural relevance. The unexpected entanglement between GMO cotton cultivation and The Game Theorists' video titles not only broadens our understanding of agricultural practices but also adds a layer of unexpected whimsy, akin to a surprise plot twist in a thrilling game narrative.

Our results not only confirmed the presence of a strong positive correlation but also underscored the statistical significance of this relationship, aligning with the unexpected conjecture posed by @GameTheoryFanatic101 on Twitter. The robustness of this correlation, akin to an unbreakable quest item, further emphasizes the substantial impact of agricultural practices on contemporary internet subculture. The r-squared value of 0.8966931 echoes the profound explanatory power of this relationship, analogous to unlocking a game's hidden mechanics, and reinforces the compelling nature of our findings.

In summary, our research delivers a novel insight into the interplay between agricultural innovation and digital content creation. Furthermore, it emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary exploration in unexpected domains and underscores the relevance of humor and whimsy in scholarly discourse. As we unravel this unexpected association, we invite further exploration and inquiry to seam the threads of seemingly disparate phenomena. After all, who knew that agriculture and internet culture could be so inseparably intertwined, much like a well-crafted pun in an academic paper?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Mississippi and How trendy The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Cotton Gin-novation: How GMO Cotton Cultivation in Mississippi is "Sewing" Up The Game Theorists

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the intriguing connection between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Mississippi and the trendiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. Utilizing data from the USDA on cotton cultivation and AI analysis of YouTube video titles, we sought to understand if there is a relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Surprisingly, our findings unveiled a strong positive correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9469388 and p < 0.01 from 2009 to 2022. Our research sheds light on the unanticipated entanglement of agricultural practices and internet culture, "seeding" a new area of interdisciplinary inquiry. As we delve into the "theoretics" behind this phenomenon, we also share a few lighthearted dad jokes to "crop" up the reader's interest.

For example:
Why did the game theorist bring a ladder to the cotton field? Because he wanted to reach the high levels of cotton cultivation, just like his video titles!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As our society becomes increasingly interconnected, the lines between disparate fields of study continue to blur, much like how the lines on a cotton fabric blur under careful examination. In this paper, we unveil a surprising connection between GMO cotton cultivation in Mississippi and the trendiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. While this correlation may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a haystack, our findings suggest a strong positive relationship, highlighting the unexpected interplay between agriculture and internet subculture.
Diving into the world of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), we encounter a rich tapestry of scientific innovation, agricultural practices, and polarizing debates. The adoption of GMO cotton in Mississippi represents a "thread" in the larger fabric of agricultural advancements, contributing to increased productivity and pest resistance. But how does this "g-emo-tionally" charged topic intersect with the realm of internet content creation? Well, just like a well-stitched seam, our research unravels the intricate connections between these seemingly unrelated areas.
Speaking of unraveling, have you heard the joke about the cotton farmer? He always "planted" jokes while working in the fields because he liked to "cultivate" humor along with his crops!
The Game Theorists, a popular YouTube channel delving into the analytical depths of video games and pop culture, have garnered a substantial following with their thought-provoking content. However, it is their video titles that piqued our curiosity. "Leveling up" from mere observations to data analysis, we meticulously examined the trends in their video titles to uncover any discernible patterns or links to cotton cultivation. The results left our research team "spun" around in surprise, as the correlation between the two variables emerged as clear as a well-ironed shirt.
Why did the cotton farmer use a computer? Because he wanted to keep up with the latest cotton-tivation methods and the most current video title trends like a "ginnovative" farmer!
Anchoring our inquiry in rigorous statistical analysis, we navigated through the labyrinth of data points to unearth this unexpected relationship. The correlation coefficient of 0.9469388 serves as a solid testament to the strength of the connection, leaving statistical significance as undeniable as the ever-present lint on freshly picked cotton.
In our journey to untangle this curious web of associations, we also aim to add a touch of lightheartedness to our scholarly pursuits. After all, what's research without a sprinkling of unexpected humor to "spin" things around?
How does a cotton farmer end a conversation? He "bales" out with a witty punchline!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Mississippi and the trendiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. The correlation coefficient of 0.9469388 underscored the unexpected intertwining of these seemingly disparate variables, akin to finding a rare collectible item in a virtual game.
The obtained r-squared value of 0.8966931 further emphasized the robustness of this relationship, signifying that approximately 89.67% of the variability in the trendiness of YouTube video titles can be explained by the adoption of GMO cotton cultivation in Mississippi. This level of explanatory power is quite astounding, much like discovering a hidden pathway in a complex video game world.
The statistical significance of the correlation, with a p-value less than 0.01, alludes to the fact that this relationship is not by mere chance but holds substantial weight in our findings. These results resonate as strongly as an expertly crafted cotton bale, promising a "baleful" impact on the perceptions of the relationship between agriculture and digital content creation.
Not to "bale" on our readers, here's a cotton-themed dad joke for a bit of levity: Why did the cotton farmer see a therapist? Because he was having "baleful" thoughts about his crop's future!
Please refer to Fig. 1 for a visual representation of this remarkable correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has brought to light a surprising and robust connection between the adoption of GMO cotton cultivation in Mississippi and the trendiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. This unexpected correlation has woven together seemingly unrelated fields, reminding us that in the fabric of the scientific world, threads of connection can be found in the most unexpected places.

The strength of the correlation between these variables, as evidenced by the correlation coefficient of 0.9469388 and the r-squared value of 0.8966931, has left us "threading" the line between fascination and amusement. It appears that just as cotton fibers intertwine to form a strong fabric, the interplay between agricultural practices and internet culture can yield surprising patterns.

While this connection may seem as unlikely as a needle in a haystack, it's clear that this phenomenon is not mere happenstance - much like a well-tailored suit, it is precise and statistically significant.

It seems that just as a cotton farmer carefully tends to his crop, ensuring a fruitful harvest, The Game Theorists craft their video titles with a similar diligence, cultivating a captivating and on-trend digital presence.

As we unravel the implications of our findings, I must admit - it has been a yarn full of spun surprises, leaving us "cotton"-ing onto a newfound appreciation for the unexpected twists and turns of interdisciplinary research.

To end on a lighter note, here's a related dad joke: Why don't cotton farmers ever have time for new video games? Because they're too busy "gmo-ting" down the latest agricultural innovations!

In light of our comprehensive findings, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. The connection between GMO cotton cultivation in Mississippi and The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles has been thoroughly "fabric-ated" and "sewn" up.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Cotton Gin-novation: How GMO Cotton Cultivation in Mississippi is Sewing Up The Game Theorists. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Agricultural Innovations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Cotton Gin-novation: How GMO Cotton Cultivation in Mississippi is Sewing Up The Game Theorists. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Biotech and Agribusiness Innovation Research (SBAIR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Cotton Gin-novation: How GMO Cotton Cultivation in Mississippi is Sewing Up The Game Theorists with an abstract of In this study, we investigate the intriguing connection between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton cultivation in Mississippi and the trendiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. Utilizing data from the USDA on cotton cultivation and AI analysis of YouTube video titles, we sought to understand if there is a relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Surprisingly, our findings unveiled a strong positive correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9469388 and p < 0.01 from 2009 to 2022. Our research sheds light on the unanticipated entanglement of agricultural practices and internet culture, "seeding" a new area of interdisciplinary inquiry. As we delve into the "theoretics" behind this phenomenon, we also share a few lighthearted dad jokes to "crop" up the reader's interest.
For example:
Why did the game theorist bring a ladder to the cotton field? Because he wanted to reach the high levels of cotton cultivation, just like his video titles!

ChatGPT:

genetically modified organism cotton, GMO cotton cultivation, Mississippi cotton cultivation, USDA cotton cultivation data, YouTube video titles analysis, correlation analysis, agriculture and Internet culture intersection, interdisciplinary research, game theorists, cotton cultivation and game theory, AI analysis of YouTube video titles

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in Mississippi
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in Mississippi genetically modified with both Bt and HT
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in Mississippi

How trendy The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How trendy The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How trendy The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are

Correlation r = 0.9469388 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8966931 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 89.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., How trendy The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in Mississippi) over the 14 years from 2009 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.9E-7. 0.0000002872455542726361000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 2.9E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,481,342 random variables You don't actually need 3 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 13 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 13 because we have two variables measured over a period of 14 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.84, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in cotton in Mississippi (GMO cotton %)9389989899999999999999999998
How trendy The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are (Trendiness score)5.470656.69237.04356.967.17.35717.12077.65317.0697.31037.6617.48287.1034




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([93,89,98,98,99,99,99,99,99,99,99,99,99,98,])
array_2 = np.array([5.4706,5,6.6923,7.0435,6.96,7.1,7.3571,7.1207,7.6531,7.069,7.3103,7.661,7.4828,7.1034,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in Mississippi"
array_2_name = "How trendy The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 5252 · Black Variable ID: 807 · Red Variable ID: 25729
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0