about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,243 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of zoologists in Alabama and the second variable is The average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2014 to 2019, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of zoologists in Alabama increased, so did the local appreciation for wildlife. This heightened interest in all things furry, scaly, and feathered naturally led to a greater viewership and engagement with Deep Look videos, ultimately boosting the average number of likes. The zoologists may not have been directly studying YouTube behavior, but their passion for critters inadvertently unleashed a tidal wave of digital wildlife love. It's a zoologist takeover, one click at a time!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Create an image reflecting the scene in which a group of zoologists in Alabama passionately discuss their latest research on local wildlife in a cyber data art style. The room is filled with an electric atmosphere as the researchers exchange observations and findings. Meanwhile, on a computer screen, a captivating Deep Look YouTube video showcasing the intricate details of a snake's scales is gaining numerous likes, symbolizing the growing appreciation for wildlife ignited by the zoologists' dedication. The image should exude a sense of digital wave and fusion of enthusiasm for wildlife with rising viewers' appreciation, capturing the essence of wildlife love in a visually striking manner. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of zoologists in Alabama and The average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Symbolism Art nouveau Data cyber art Cutsy art illustration Art nouveau
ChatGPT: Data cyber art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of zoologists in Alabama and The average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos, in the following situation: As the number of zoologists in Alabama increased, so did the local appreciation for wildlife. This heightened interest in all things furry, scaly, and feathered naturally led to a greater viewership and engagement with Deep Look videos, ultimately boosting the average number of likes. The zoologists may not have been directly studying YouTube behavior, but their passion for critters inadvertently unleashed a tidal wave of digital wildlife love. It's a zoologist takeover, one click at a time!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Alabama, a group of zoologists gather in their lab, eagerly discussing their latest research on local wildlife. As they exchange findings and observations, the room buzzes with excitement and passion for animals. Meanwhile, on the computer screen, a Deep Look YouTube video showcasing the intricate details of a snake's scales captures the attention of numerous viewers. The video's like counter steadily increases, reflecting the growing appreciation for wildlife sparked by the zoologists' dedication. The scene embodies the fusion of zoologists' enthusiasm for wildlife and the rising average number of likes on Deep Look videos, creating a digital wave of wildlife love.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Data cyber art ] and depicting this scene: In Alabama, a group of zoologists gather in their lab, eagerly discussing their latest research on local wildlife. As they exchange findings and observations, the room buzzes with excitement and passion for animals. Meanwhile, on the computer screen, a Deep Look YouTube video showcasing the intricate details of a snake's scales captures the attention of numerous viewers. The video's like counter steadily increases, reflecting the growing appreciation for wildlife sparked by the zoologists' dedication. The scene embodies the fusion of zoologists' enthusiasm for wildlife and the rising average number of likes on Deep Look videos, creating a digital wave of wildlife love. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Create an image reflecting the scene in which a group of zoologists in Alabama passionately discuss their latest research on local wildlife in a cyber data art style. The room is filled with an electric atmosphere as the researchers exchange observations and findings. Meanwhile, on a computer screen, a captivating Deep Look YouTube video showcasing the intricate details of a snake's scales is gaining numerous likes, symbolizing the growing appreciation for wildlife ignited by the zoologists' dedication. The image should exude a sense of digital wave and fusion of enthusiasm for wildlife with rising viewers' appreciation, capturing the essence of wildlife love in a visually striking manner.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of zoologists in Alabama caused The average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Zoologist Likes: A Pawsitively Correlational Study

The Journal of Furr-ocious Animal Behavior

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of zoologists in Alabama and The average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9958237 and p < 0.01 for 2014 to 2019.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Zoologist Likes: A Pawsitively Correlational Study"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we dug our claws into the data to investigate the fascinating relationship between the number of zoologists in Alabama and the average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos. Utilizing information from the Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube, we embarked on a wild research adventure. To our surprise, we discovered a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9958237 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2014 to 2019. Our findings have undoubtedly unleashed a roar of amusement, shedding light on the unexpected paw-sibilities of human and animal interactions. Whether it's a case of purr-fect harmony or simply a quirky coincidence, this study demonstrates the em-purr-ical evidence of the curious link between zoologists and online feline fandom. Our research not only takes a bite out of skepticism but also scratches the surface of a new avenue for exploration in the world of digital and zoological phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of zoologists in Alabama and The average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Zoologist Likes: A Pawsitively Correlational Study"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we dug our claws into the data to investigate the fascinating relationship between the number of zoologists in Alabama and the average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos. Utilizing information from the Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube, we embarked on a wild research adventure. To our surprise, we discovered a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9958237 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2014 to 2019. Our findings have undoubtedly unleashed a roar of amusement, shedding light on the unexpected paw-sibilities of human and animal interactions. Whether it's a case of purr-fect harmony or simply a quirky coincidence, this study demonstrates the em-purr-ical evidence of the curious link between zoologists and online feline fandom. Our research not only takes a bite out of skepticism but also scratches the surface of a new avenue for exploration in the world of digital and zoological phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ladies and gentlemen, gather 'round for a tail of statistical intrigue and zoological wonder! Today, we embark on a journey to explore the unexpected and, some might say, fur-tunate connection between the number of zoologists in the great state of Alabama and the average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos. As we dive into this purr-plexing correlation, one cannot help but wonder: Are we witnessing a case of feline fanaticism, or is there something more profound at play here?

The concept of correlating zoologist numbers to online feline fandom might seem quite mew-nique, but in the world of research, we are always on the prowl for unexpected connections. Funny enough, our initial inspiration for this study came from casually perusing YouTube and stumbling upon delightful Deep Look videos about all things wild and wonderful. The observation that these videos attract likes like catnip led us to ponder: Could there be a statistical relationship between these mesmerizing clips and the presence of zoologically inclined individuals in a purr-ticular geographic area?

To approach this meow-sive question, we sought data from the Bureau of Larbor Statistics to obtain the number of zoologists in Alabama, and from YouTube, we extracted the average number of likes on Deep Look videos from 2014 to 2019. With our paws on the keyboard and our minds roaring with curiosity, we set out to conduct a thorough analysis that would unveil the elusive connection between these seemingly unrelated variables.

But before we unveil the purr-spiring findings of our study, let's address the elephant in the room – or in this case, the cat: Why would the number of zoologists in Alabama have any influence on the popularity of Deep Look YouTube videos? Could it be that these zoologists, through their expert knowledge and appreciation for the wild world, are amplifying the allure of these captivating videos? Or perhaps it's simply a coincidence, and we're barking up the wrong tree in search of a causative link.

As we delve deep into the intricacies of this correlational study, we hope to shed light not only on the statistical relationship between these variables but also on the untamed potential for unexpected connections. So scratch that itch of curiosity and join us on this wild ride through the jungle of statistics and zoological fascination. It's time to unleash the data and unravel the mystery of zoologist likes – a pawsitively meow-velous adventure awaits!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of zoologists in Alabama and The average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Zoologist Likes: A Pawsitively Correlational Study"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we dug our claws into the data to investigate the fascinating relationship between the number of zoologists in Alabama and the average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos. Utilizing information from the Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube, we embarked on a wild research adventure. To our surprise, we discovered a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9958237 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2014 to 2019. Our findings have undoubtedly unleashed a roar of amusement, shedding light on the unexpected paw-sibilities of human and animal interactions. Whether it's a case of purr-fect harmony or simply a quirky coincidence, this study demonstrates the em-purr-ical evidence of the curious link between zoologists and online feline fandom. Our research not only takes a bite out of skepticism but also scratches the surface of a new avenue for exploration in the world of digital and zoological phenomena.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, gather 'round for a tail of statistical intrigue and zoological wonder! Today, we embark on a journey to explore the unexpected and, some might say, fur-tunate connection between the number of zoologists in the great state of Alabama and the average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos. As we dive into this purr-plexing correlation, one cannot help but wonder: Are we witnessing a case of feline fanaticism, or is there something more profound at play here?
The concept of correlating zoologist numbers to online feline fandom might seem quite mew-nique, but in the world of research, we are always on the prowl for unexpected connections. Funny enough, our initial inspiration for this study came from casually perusing YouTube and stumbling upon delightful Deep Look videos about all things wild and wonderful. The observation that these videos attract likes like catnip led us to ponder: Could there be a statistical relationship between these mesmerizing clips and the presence of zoologically inclined individuals in a purr-ticular geographic area?
To approach this meow-sive question, we sought data from the Bureau of Larbor Statistics to obtain the number of zoologists in Alabama, and from YouTube, we extracted the average number of likes on Deep Look videos from 2014 to 2019. With our paws on the keyboard and our minds roaring with curiosity, we set out to conduct a thorough analysis that would unveil the elusive connection between these seemingly unrelated variables.
But before we unveil the purr-spiring findings of our study, let's address the elephant in the room – or in this case, the cat: Why would the number of zoologists in Alabama have any influence on the popularity of Deep Look YouTube videos? Could it be that these zoologists, through their expert knowledge and appreciation for the wild world, are amplifying the allure of these captivating videos? Or perhaps it's simply a coincidence, and we're barking up the wrong tree in search of a causative link.
As we delve deep into the intricacies of this correlational study, we hope to shed light not only on the statistical relationship between these variables but also on the untamed potential for unexpected connections. So scratch that itch of curiosity and join us on this wild ride through the jungle of statistics and zoological fascination. It's time to unleash the data and unravel the mystery of zoologist likes – a pawsitively meow-velous adventure awaits!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, "The Zoological Landscape of Alabama in the 21st Century," Smith et al. (2013) documented the growing presence of zoologists in the state, highlighting the burgeoning interest in wild fauna and flora. This comprehensive study provided a foundational understanding of the zoological community in Alabama and laid the groundwork for our investigation into their virtual interactions with captivating wildlife content.

Another essential piece of literature in our quest for understanding the zoologists' influence on digital feline fascination is the insightful research by Doe and Jones (2016), "Online Feline Fandom: Unraveling the Mysteries of Viral Cat Content." Their in-depth analysis of internet cat culture shed light on the intricate web of likes, shares, and comments that revolve around feline-themed media. While their focus was not specifically on zoologists, their findings gave us a meow-mentous push in the right direction and sparked our curiosity about potential influencers in this digital ecosystem.

As we take a paw-sitive leap from the realm of serious scholarly work into the world of pop culture, it's noteworthy to consider non-fiction books that may provide indirect insights into our study. Books such as "The Secret Life of Cats" by John Bradshaw and Sarah Ellis, "Zoobiquity" by Barbara Natterson-Horowitz and Kathryn Bowers, and "Cat Sense" by John Bradshaw whiskers us away on a smorgasbord of cat-related knowledge, offering a purr-fectly delightful distraction from the rigors of academic analysis.

In the realm of fiction, the feline theme continues to capture the imagination, weaving tales of mystery, adventure, and occasional cat-astrophes. Works such as T.S. Eliot’s "Old Possum's Book of Practical Cats," Haruki Murakami's "Kafka on the Shore," and Rudyard Kipling's "The Jungle Book" offer intriguing, albeit tangential, cat-related narratives that could tickle the fancy of feline fanciers and perhaps even inspire some paws-itively creative interpretations of our data.

Venturing further into the realm of childhood reminiscence, cartoons and children's shows like "Heathcliff," "Garfield and Friends," and "The Wild Thornberrys" bring a lighthearted yet insightful perspective on human-animal interactions, providing a warm nostalgia that beckons the child in all of us. While the scholarly community may not typically look to animated series for research inspiration, the cultural influence of these shows cannot be denied, and their impact on our understanding of zoologists and online feline fervor should not be overlooked.

With a purr-sonal touch, these diverse sources of literature add charm and whimsy to our investigation, reminding us that even in the serious pursuit of knowledge, a sprinkle of playfulness can unleash the full potential of our research. So, with our literary companions in tow, we paws for a moment, embracing the mew-nique intrigue that awaits us in the data analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of zoologists in Alabama and The average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube . You used data from 2014 to 2019

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Zoologist Likes: A Pawsitively Correlational Study"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we dug our claws into the data to investigate the fascinating relationship between the number of zoologists in Alabama and the average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos. Utilizing information from the Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube, we embarked on a wild research adventure. To our surprise, we discovered a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9958237 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2014 to 2019. Our findings have undoubtedly unleashed a roar of amusement, shedding light on the unexpected paw-sibilities of human and animal interactions. Whether it's a case of purr-fect harmony or simply a quirky coincidence, this study demonstrates the em-purr-ical evidence of the curious link between zoologists and online feline fandom. Our research not only takes a bite out of skepticism but also scratches the surface of a new avenue for exploration in the world of digital and zoological phenomena.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, gather 'round for a tail of statistical intrigue and zoological wonder! Today, we embark on a journey to explore the unexpected and, some might say, fur-tunate connection between the number of zoologists in the great state of Alabama and the average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos. As we dive into this purr-plexing correlation, one cannot help but wonder: Are we witnessing a case of feline fanaticism, or is there something more profound at play here?
The concept of correlating zoologist numbers to online feline fandom might seem quite mew-nique, but in the world of research, we are always on the prowl for unexpected connections. Funny enough, our initial inspiration for this study came from casually perusing YouTube and stumbling upon delightful Deep Look videos about all things wild and wonderful. The observation that these videos attract likes like catnip led us to ponder: Could there be a statistical relationship between these mesmerizing clips and the presence of zoologically inclined individuals in a purr-ticular geographic area?
To approach this meow-sive question, we sought data from the Bureau of Larbor Statistics to obtain the number of zoologists in Alabama, and from YouTube, we extracted the average number of likes on Deep Look videos from 2014 to 2019. With our paws on the keyboard and our minds roaring with curiosity, we set out to conduct a thorough analysis that would unveil the elusive connection between these seemingly unrelated variables.
But before we unveil the purr-spiring findings of our study, let's address the elephant in the room – or in this case, the cat: Why would the number of zoologists in Alabama have any influence on the popularity of Deep Look YouTube videos? Could it be that these zoologists, through their expert knowledge and appreciation for the wild world, are amplifying the allure of these captivating videos? Or perhaps it's simply a coincidence, and we're barking up the wrong tree in search of a causative link.
As we delve deep into the intricacies of this correlational study, we hope to shed light not only on the statistical relationship between these variables but also on the untamed potential for unexpected connections. So scratch that itch of curiosity and join us on this wild ride through the jungle of statistics and zoological fascination. It's time to unleash the data and unravel the mystery of zoologist likes – a pawsitively meow-velous adventure awaits!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To tackle the enigma surrounding the correlation between the number of zoologists in Alabama and the average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos, our research team embraced a formidable blend of statistical tomfoolery and zoological pizzazz. Our convoluted approach involved paw-sing to carefully aggregate and analyze data from 2014 to 2019, while unleashing our inner wildcats to navigate the intricacies of online feline fandom.

First things first, we swooped into the Bureau of Larbor Statistics, where we tirelessly delved into the jungle of occupational data to extract the precise numbers of zoologists prowling through the wilds of Alabama. Armed with this valuable information, we paw-tnered with YouTube data to paw-rsue the average number of likes on Deep Look videos, occasionally taking a detour through the rabbit hole of internet memes and inexplicably adorable cat videos (for stress relief, of course).

With claws sharpened and whiskers twitching, we utilized a statistical analysis known as Pearson's correlation coefficient to [insert a meowgnificent percentage here] determine the degree of association between these seemingly mismatched variables. This approach allowed us to peer into the hidden jungle of numerical relationships and discern whether the surge of zoological enthusiasm in Alabama was indeed linked to the online applause for Deep Look videos.

To bask in the plausibility of our findings, we also performed a rigorous hypothesis test, unleashing the might of the p-value to ascertain the cat-astrophic significance of the correlation coefficient. Spoiler alert: the p-value was less than 0.01, leaving us utterly shell-shocked and purr-plexed by the significance of our discovery.

But hold onto your whiskers, because we weren't content with a single statistical strategy. Oh no, our insatiable curiosity led us to deploy regression analysis, a method that allowed us to expaw-lorate the predictive relationship between the number of zoologists and the average likes on Deep Look videos. The aim? To unearth the dazzling patterns underlying this curious connection and to discern whether the presence of zoologists could predict the purr-fervor for such captivating content.

However, we must caution that our data spelunking adventure had its share of meow-schances and wild hiccups. Given the nuanced nature of online data, we encountered the occasional glitch in our YouTube likes count – a plight resulting from the ever-elusive concepts of outlier videos and the unpredictably influential 'cat interference' leading to biased data. Rest assured, every erroneous count was diligently purr-owwed and meticulously scrubbed from our analysis.

In the name of full transparency, we should also address the ferocious limitations of our study. While our findings raise tantalizing questions, our correlation does not imply causation. It remains a ponderous mystery whether the presence of zoologists truly fuels the appetite for Deep Look videos, or if we've merely sniffed out a case of uncanny coincidence. Further expeditionary efforts – perhaps involving direct surveys or behavioral observations – could unravel the true nature of this connection.

In summary, our approach may have strayed into the realm of whimsy, but our fervor for unraveling statistical mysteries knows no bounds. With a blend of statistical analyses, feline-inspired determination, and a touch of scientific whimsy, we courageously leapt head-first into the petri dish of research – and what we uncovered may just whisker you away.

And now, with the methodology in the bag, let's return to the wilds of data analysis and statistical adventure. Onward, to the em-purr-ical jungle of findings and conclusions!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of zoologists in Alabama and The average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube .

For the time period 2014 to 2019, you found a correlation 0.9958237, r-squared of 0.9916648, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Zoologist Likes: A Pawsitively Correlational Study"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we dug our claws into the data to investigate the fascinating relationship between the number of zoologists in Alabama and the average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos. Utilizing information from the Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube, we embarked on a wild research adventure. To our surprise, we discovered a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9958237 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2014 to 2019. Our findings have undoubtedly unleashed a roar of amusement, shedding light on the unexpected paw-sibilities of human and animal interactions. Whether it's a case of purr-fect harmony or simply a quirky coincidence, this study demonstrates the em-purr-ical evidence of the curious link between zoologists and online feline fandom. Our research not only takes a bite out of skepticism but also scratches the surface of a new avenue for exploration in the world of digital and zoological phenomena.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ladies and gentlemen, gather 'round for a tail of statistical intrigue and zoological wonder! Today, we embark on a journey to explore the unexpected and, some might say, fur-tunate connection between the number of zoologists in the great state of Alabama and the average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos. As we dive into this purr-plexing correlation, one cannot help but wonder: Are we witnessing a case of feline fanaticism, or is there something more profound at play here?
The concept of correlating zoologist numbers to online feline fandom might seem quite mew-nique, but in the world of research, we are always on the prowl for unexpected connections. Funny enough, our initial inspiration for this study came from casually perusing YouTube and stumbling upon delightful Deep Look videos about all things wild and wonderful. The observation that these videos attract likes like catnip led us to ponder: Could there be a statistical relationship between these mesmerizing clips and the presence of zoologically inclined individuals in a purr-ticular geographic area?
To approach this meow-sive question, we sought data from the Bureau of Larbor Statistics to obtain the number of zoologists in Alabama, and from YouTube, we extracted the average number of likes on Deep Look videos from 2014 to 2019. With our paws on the keyboard and our minds roaring with curiosity, we set out to conduct a thorough analysis that would unveil the elusive connection between these seemingly unrelated variables.
But before we unveil the purr-spiring findings of our study, let's address the elephant in the room – or in this case, the cat: Why would the number of zoologists in Alabama have any influence on the popularity of Deep Look YouTube videos? Could it be that these zoologists, through their expert knowledge and appreciation for the wild world, are amplifying the allure of these captivating videos? Or perhaps it's simply a coincidence, and we're barking up the wrong tree in search of a causative link.
As we delve deep into the intricacies of this correlational study, we hope to shed light not only on the statistical relationship between these variables but also on the untamed potential for unexpected connections. So scratch that itch of curiosity and join us on this wild ride through the jungle of statistics and zoological fascination. It's time to unleash the data and unravel the mystery of zoologist likes – a pawsitively meow-velous adventure awaits!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Paws-itively thrilling results awaited us as we clawed through the data with unbridled curiosity. Our study unveiled an astoundingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9958237 and an r-squared value of 0.9916648 between the number of zoologists in Alabama and the average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos for the period spanning 2014 to 2019. To put it in simpler terms, the relationship between these variables is as clear as a cat's purr-spective of a sunny windowsill. The p-value being less than 0.01 added an extra layer of credibility to our findings, waving away any skepti-cat-tion about the significance of this remarkable association.

Our statistical meow-nipulation of the data revealed a tight, almost cuddlesome fit between the two variables, indicating that as the number of zoologists in Alabama increased, the average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos also saw a marked rise. It's almost as if the state's zoologists were unleashing a tidal wave of online feline fandom with their wild expertise and appreciation for the creatures that grace these captivating videos.

Fig. 1 presents a visual representation of this correlation, and the scatterplot therein resembles a pointillist masterpiece, with data points forming a purr-fectly linear pattern that would make even the most discerning cat purr with delight.

These findings have indeed opened a new can of worms, or dare we say, a can of catnip, in the realm of statistical correlations and zoological intrigue. While some may find this connection to be simply an amusing meow-ment of coincidence, our study has proven that there is solid evidence to support the notion that zoologists and online feline fandom are intertwined in a way that transcends mere chance.

Our results urge further paws and claws into the digital sphere of zoological fascination, pointing toward new opportunities for exploring the captivating interactions between human and animal appreciation. Whether one is a fervent feline fan or a statistical buff, this study has given us paws for thought and ignited a spark of curiosity in the wild world of correlation research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of zoologists in Alabama and The average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Zoologist Likes: A Pawsitively Correlational Study"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we dug our claws into the data to investigate the fascinating relationship between the number of zoologists in Alabama and the average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos. Utilizing information from the Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube, we embarked on a wild research adventure. To our surprise, we discovered a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9958237 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2014 to 2019. Our findings have undoubtedly unleashed a roar of amusement, shedding light on the unexpected paw-sibilities of human and animal interactions. Whether it's a case of purr-fect harmony or simply a quirky coincidence, this study demonstrates the em-purr-ical evidence of the curious link between zoologists and online feline fandom. Our research not only takes a bite out of skepticism but also scratches the surface of a new avenue for exploration in the world of digital and zoological phenomena.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, "The Zoological Landscape of Alabama in the 21st Century," Smith et al. (2013) documented the growing presence of zoologists in the state, highlighting the burgeoning interest in wild fauna and flora. This comprehensive study provided a foundational understanding of the zoological community in Alabama and laid the groundwork for our investigation into their virtual interactions with captivating wildlife content.
Another essential piece of literature in our quest for understanding the zoologists' influence on digital feline fascination is the insightful research by Doe and Jones (2016), "Online Feline Fandom: Unraveling the Mysteries of Viral Cat Content." Their in-depth analysis of internet cat culture shed light on the intricate web of likes, shares, and comments that revolve around feline-themed media. While their focus was not specifically on zoologists, their findings gave us a meow-mentous push in the right direction and sparked our curiosity about potential influencers in this digital ecosystem.
As we take a paw-sitive leap from the realm of serious scholarly work into the world of pop culture, it's noteworthy to consider non-fiction books that may provide indirect insights into our study. Books such as "The Secret Life of Cats" by John Bradshaw and Sarah Ellis, "Zoobiquity" by Barbara Natterson-Horowitz and Kathryn Bowers, and "Cat Sense" by John Bradshaw whiskers us away on a smorgasbord of cat-related knowledge, offering a purr-fectly delightful distraction from the rigors of academic analysis.
In the realm of fiction, the feline theme continues to capture the imagination, weaving tales of mystery, adventure, and occasional cat-astrophes. Works such as T.S. Eliot’s "Old Possum's Book of Practical Cats," Haruki Murakami's "Kafka on the Shore," and Rudyard Kipling's "The Jungle Book" offer intriguing, albeit tangential, cat-related narratives that could tickle the fancy of feline fanciers and perhaps even inspire some paws-itively creative interpretations of our data.
Venturing further into the realm of childhood reminiscence, cartoons and children's shows like "Heathcliff," "Garfield and Friends," and "The Wild Thornberrys" bring a lighthearted yet insightful perspective on human-animal interactions, providing a warm nostalgia that beckons the child in all of us. While the scholarly community may not typically look to animated series for research inspiration, the cultural influence of these shows cannot be denied, and their impact on our understanding of zoologists and online feline fervor should not be overlooked.
With a purr-sonal touch, these diverse sources of literature add charm and whimsy to our investigation, reminding us that even in the serious pursuit of knowledge, a sprinkle of playfulness can unleash the full potential of our research. So, with our literary companions in tow, we paws for a moment, embracing the mew-nique intrigue that awaits us in the data analysis.

[[RESULTS]]
Paws-itively thrilling results awaited us as we clawed through the data with unbridled curiosity. Our study unveiled an astoundingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9958237 and an r-squared value of 0.9916648 between the number of zoologists in Alabama and the average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos for the period spanning 2014 to 2019. To put it in simpler terms, the relationship between these variables is as clear as a cat's purr-spective of a sunny windowsill. The p-value being less than 0.01 added an extra layer of credibility to our findings, waving away any skepti-cat-tion about the significance of this remarkable association.
Our statistical meow-nipulation of the data revealed a tight, almost cuddlesome fit between the two variables, indicating that as the number of zoologists in Alabama increased, the average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos also saw a marked rise. It's almost as if the state's zoologists were unleashing a tidal wave of online feline fandom with their wild expertise and appreciation for the creatures that grace these captivating videos.
Fig. 1 presents a visual representation of this correlation, and the scatterplot therein resembles a pointillist masterpiece, with data points forming a purr-fectly linear pattern that would make even the most discerning cat purr with delight.
These findings have indeed opened a new can of worms, or dare we say, a can of catnip, in the realm of statistical correlations and zoological intrigue. While some may find this connection to be simply an amusing meow-ment of coincidence, our study has proven that there is solid evidence to support the notion that zoologists and online feline fandom are intertwined in a way that transcends mere chance.
Our results urge further paws and claws into the digital sphere of zoological fascination, pointing toward new opportunities for exploring the captivating interactions between human and animal appreciation. Whether one is a fervent feline fan or a statistical buff, this study has given us paws for thought and ignited a spark of curiosity in the wild world of correlation research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The purrplexing and paw-sitive correlation uncovered in our study between the number of zoologists in Alabama and the average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos has sent ripples through the scientific community. Our results not only fur-ther establish the previously observed trend of the zoological community's impact on digital feline fervor but also raise questions that tickle the whiskers of the curious.

Our findings corroborate the work of Smith et al. (2013), whose examination of the growing zoological landscape in Alabama laid the groundwork for our study. As our results revealed, the surge in the state's zoologist population appears to have created a purr-fect storm of online feline fandom. The striking correlation coefficient of 0.9958237 and the near-unison in the trends between zoologists and YouTube likes lend em-purr-ical support to the notion that the state's aficionados of wild fauna wield a significant influence in the digital domain.

Drawing a meow-nificent parallel, we observed that the relationship between the number of zoologists and likes on Deep Look videos is as tight as a cat's curl. Each increase in zoologists seemed to be accompanied by a corresponding surge in likes, much like the synchronized movements of a litter of kittens. This statistical dance between the variables has purr-vided irrefutable proof that the state's zoologists are playing a prominent role in fostering the online admiration for the wild creatures featured in the captivating videos.

While the meow-vellous correlation between zoologists in Alabama and feline fandom on Deep Look YouTube videos may initially appear whimsical, our results whisker away doubts about the significance of this paw-sitively captivating association. As we delve deeper into this correlation, we should paws and appreciate the potential implications it holds for understanding the intersection of human-animal interactions in the digital age.

As we embark on this exciting journey into the hitherto uncharted terrain of zoologists and online feline fandom, our study beckons researchers to keep their ears perked and their eyes wide open for further exploration of how human appreciation for wildlife is intertwined with the digital realm. Our findings have undoubtedly opened up a whole new playground for statistical and zoological meow-tigation, and we eagerly anticipate the discoveries that lie ahead.

This study has not only shown the value of a purr-sistent approach to scientific investigation but has also demonstrated that sometimes, in the world of research, the most thought-provoking discoveries stem from the most un-cat-pected of correlations. So, let's keep our claws sharp and our curiosity piqued as we continue to unravel the enigma of zoologists and online feline fascination. The fascination continues, may the feline force be with us!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of zoologists in Alabama and The average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Zoologist Likes: A Pawsitively Correlational Study"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we dug our claws into the data to investigate the fascinating relationship between the number of zoologists in Alabama and the average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos. Utilizing information from the Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube, we embarked on a wild research adventure. To our surprise, we discovered a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9958237 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2014 to 2019. Our findings have undoubtedly unleashed a roar of amusement, shedding light on the unexpected paw-sibilities of human and animal interactions. Whether it's a case of purr-fect harmony or simply a quirky coincidence, this study demonstrates the em-purr-ical evidence of the curious link between zoologists and online feline fandom. Our research not only takes a bite out of skepticism but also scratches the surface of a new avenue for exploration in the world of digital and zoological phenomena.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, gather 'round for a tail of statistical intrigue and zoological wonder! Today, we embark on a journey to explore the unexpected and, some might say, fur-tunate connection between the number of zoologists in the great state of Alabama and the average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos. As we dive into this purr-plexing correlation, one cannot help but wonder: Are we witnessing a case of feline fanaticism, or is there something more profound at play here?
The concept of correlating zoologist numbers to online feline fandom might seem quite mew-nique, but in the world of research, we are always on the prowl for unexpected connections. Funny enough, our initial inspiration for this study came from casually perusing YouTube and stumbling upon delightful Deep Look videos about all things wild and wonderful. The observation that these videos attract likes like catnip led us to ponder: Could there be a statistical relationship between these mesmerizing clips and the presence of zoologically inclined individuals in a purr-ticular geographic area?
To approach this meow-sive question, we sought data from the Bureau of Larbor Statistics to obtain the number of zoologists in Alabama, and from YouTube, we extracted the average number of likes on Deep Look videos from 2014 to 2019. With our paws on the keyboard and our minds roaring with curiosity, we set out to conduct a thorough analysis that would unveil the elusive connection between these seemingly unrelated variables.
But before we unveil the purr-spiring findings of our study, let's address the elephant in the room – or in this case, the cat: Why would the number of zoologists in Alabama have any influence on the popularity of Deep Look YouTube videos? Could it be that these zoologists, through their expert knowledge and appreciation for the wild world, are amplifying the allure of these captivating videos? Or perhaps it's simply a coincidence, and we're barking up the wrong tree in search of a causative link.
As we delve deep into the intricacies of this correlational study, we hope to shed light not only on the statistical relationship between these variables but also on the untamed potential for unexpected connections. So scratch that itch of curiosity and join us on this wild ride through the jungle of statistics and zoological fascination. It's time to unleash the data and unravel the mystery of zoologist likes – a pawsitively meow-velous adventure awaits!

[[RESULTS]]
Paws-itively thrilling results awaited us as we clawed through the data with unbridled curiosity. Our study unveiled an astoundingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9958237 and an r-squared value of 0.9916648 between the number of zoologists in Alabama and the average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos for the period spanning 2014 to 2019. To put it in simpler terms, the relationship between these variables is as clear as a cat's purr-spective of a sunny windowsill. The p-value being less than 0.01 added an extra layer of credibility to our findings, waving away any skepti-cat-tion about the significance of this remarkable association.
Our statistical meow-nipulation of the data revealed a tight, almost cuddlesome fit between the two variables, indicating that as the number of zoologists in Alabama increased, the average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos also saw a marked rise. It's almost as if the state's zoologists were unleashing a tidal wave of online feline fandom with their wild expertise and appreciation for the creatures that grace these captivating videos.
Fig. 1 presents a visual representation of this correlation, and the scatterplot therein resembles a pointillist masterpiece, with data points forming a purr-fectly linear pattern that would make even the most discerning cat purr with delight.
These findings have indeed opened a new can of worms, or dare we say, a can of catnip, in the realm of statistical correlations and zoological intrigue. While some may find this connection to be simply an amusing meow-ment of coincidence, our study has proven that there is solid evidence to support the notion that zoologists and online feline fandom are intertwined in a way that transcends mere chance.
Our results urge further paws and claws into the digital sphere of zoological fascination, pointing toward new opportunities for exploring the captivating interactions between human and animal appreciation. Whether one is a fervent feline fan or a statistical buff, this study has given us paws for thought and ignited a spark of curiosity in the wild world of correlation research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has un-leash-ed a purr-niciously intriguing correlation between the number of zoologists in Alabama and the average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos. The meow-velous correlation coefficient of 0.9958237 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2014 to 2019 has left us purr-plexed and positively tickled by the paw-sibilities. It's almost as if the state's zoologists have cast a spell of enchantment, beckoning feline aficionados from all corners of the internet to hit that like button like it's a scratching post.

Our findings have purred a new melody in the symphony of statistical correlations, highlighting the untamed potential for un-fur-gettable connections in the digital and zoological realms. Whether it's a case of purr-fect harmony or simply a quirky co-fur-dinace, this study demonstrates the em-purr-ical evidence of the paw-sitive relationship between zoologists and online feline fandom. These results are truly nothing to sneeze at – unless, of course, you're allergic to cats.

With such staggering statistics, we confidently assert that no more research is needed in this area. The cats are out of the bag, and we've all been left feline fine about the statistical prowess of zoologist likes. It's time to paws and reflect on the wild meow-mentum of this correlation and embrace the fur-nomenon as a whisker-worthy addition to the eclectic world of data-driven curiosities.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Zoologist Likes: A Pawsitively Correlational Study. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Furr-ocious Animal Behavior


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Zoologist Likes: A Pawsitively Correlational Study. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

United Association for Wildlife Welfare


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Zoologist Likes: A Pawsitively Correlational Study with an abstract of In this study, we dug our claws into the data to investigate the fascinating relationship between the number of zoologists in Alabama and the average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos. Utilizing information from the Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube, we embarked on a wild research adventure. To our surprise, we discovered a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9958237 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2014 to 2019. Our findings have undoubtedly unleashed a roar of amusement, shedding light on the unexpected paw-sibilities of human and animal interactions. Whether it's a case of purr-fect harmony or simply a quirky coincidence, this study demonstrates the em-purr-ical evidence of the curious link between zoologists and online feline fandom. Our research not only takes a bite out of skepticism but also scratches the surface of a new avenue for exploration in the world of digital and zoological phenomena.

ChatGPT:

zoologists in Alabama, likes on Deep Look YouTube videos, correlation coefficient, Bureau of Labor Statistics, YouTube statistics, animal interactions, feline fandom, digital phenomena, zoological phenomena, research study

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of zoologists in Alabama
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of zoologists and wildlife biologists in Alabama
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of zoologists in Alabama

The average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos
Detailed data title: The average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with The average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9958237 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9916648 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 99.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of zoologists in Alabama) over the 6 years from 2014 through 2019.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.6E-5. 0.0000261257903203381150000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 1 in 0.0026% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 38,276 random variables You don't actually need 38 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.96, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201420152016201720182019
The number of zoologists in Alabama (Laborers)100130210190260340
The average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos (Average likes)1594518649.743613.837063.852632.976342.5




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([100,130,210,190,260,340,])
array_2 = np.array([15945,18649.7,43613.8,37063.8,52632.9,76342.5,])
array_1_name = "The number of zoologists in Alabama"
array_2_name = "The average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 5243 · Black Variable ID: 4462 · Red Variable ID: 25928
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0