about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,937 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Food spending in Arkansas and the second variable is Total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2014 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

It's simple really - as Arkansans indulged in more delicious meals, they were filled with a-peeling joy. This led to an uptick in their humorous and punny comments on Simone Giertz's videos, creating a feedback loop of food-fueled comedy gold. It's like they say, you can't have a good comment without some food for thought!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image of a cozy Arkansas kitchen where a family sits around a table with delicious homemade southern comfort food. The family is beaming with satisfaction as they enjoy their meal. In the background, a laptop displays Simone Giertz's YouTube video with a flood of quirky and pun-filled comments from Arkansan viewers. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Food spending in Arkansas and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Oragami Whimsical illustration a Polaroid photo A photo-realistic image a funny image macro
ChatGPT: a funny image macro

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Food spending in Arkansas and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube videos, in the following situation: It's simple really - as Arkansans indulged in more delicious meals, they were filled with a-peeling joy. This led to an uptick in their humorous and punny comments on Simone Giertz's videos, creating a feedback loop of food-fueled comedy gold. It's like they say, you can't have a good comment without some food for thought!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy Arkansas kitchen, a family sits around a table filled with homemade southern comfort food, their smiles reflecting pure satisfaction. Meanwhile, Simone Giertz's YouTube video plays on a laptop nearby, and the screen is filled with a flood of quirky and pun-filled comments from Arkansan viewers, all inspired by their delightful meal.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image macro ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy Arkansas kitchen, a family sits around a table filled with homemade southern comfort food, their smiles reflecting pure satisfaction. Meanwhile, Simone Giertz's YouTube video plays on a laptop nearby, and the screen is filled with a flood of quirky and pun-filled comments from Arkansan viewers, all inspired by their delightful meal. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image of a cozy Arkansas kitchen where a family sits around a table with delicious homemade southern comfort food. The family is beaming with satisfaction as they enjoy their meal. In the background, a laptop displays Simone Giertz's YouTube video with a flood of quirky and pun-filled comments from Arkansan viewers.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Food spending in Arkansas caused Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube videos to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Feasting Finances and Funny Feedback: Exploring the Link Between Food Spending in Arkansas and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube Videos

The Journal of Gastronomical Economics and Social Media Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Food spending in Arkansas and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from UDSA and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9786555 and p < 0.01 for 2014 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Feasting Finances and Funny Feedback: Exploring the Link Between Food Spending in Arkansas and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between food spending in Arkansas and the number of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos has been a topic of both intrigue and amusement. In this study, we delve into this deliciously peculiar relationship, aiming to uncover whether there is a statistical connection or if it's merely a figment of our craving-driven imagination.

Using comprehensive data from the USDA and YouTube, our research team embarked on a quest to scrutinize this unlikely pairing. To our surprise, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9786555 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2014 to 2020. As we marinated in these statistical intricacies, it became clear that there is indeed a mouthwatering association between food spending in Arkansas and the veritable feast of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube channel.

As we chewed over the data, a dad joke inevitably emerged: "What do you call a YouTube video about food spending? A 'commentary'!" Despite the lighthearted pun, our analysis indicates that for every dollar increase in food spending in Arkansas, there is a nearly one-to-one increase in the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. While causation remains hidden like a well-crafted illusion, the correlation serves as a tantalizing appetizer for further exploration into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

In conclusion, our findings provide empirical support for the notion that food spending habits and the comedic engineering marvels of Simone Giertz on YouTube are, in fact, entangled in a statistically significant manner. This peculiar coupling raises both eyebrows and chuckles, prompting us to ask: Are our consumer choices influencing our virtual musings, or is there a yet-undiscovered force at play, shaping this unexpected alliance?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Food spending in Arkansas and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Feasting Finances and Funny Feedback: Exploring the Link Between Food Spending in Arkansas and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between food spending in Arkansas and the number of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos has been a topic of both intrigue and amusement. In this study, we delve into this deliciously peculiar relationship, aiming to uncover whether there is a statistical connection or if it's merely a figment of our craving-driven imagination.

Using comprehensive data from the USDA and YouTube, our research team embarked on a quest to scrutinize this unlikely pairing. To our surprise, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9786555 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2014 to 2020. As we marinated in these statistical intricacies, it became clear that there is indeed a mouthwatering association between food spending in Arkansas and the veritable feast of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube channel.

As we chewed over the data, a dad joke inevitably emerged: "What do you call a YouTube video about food spending? A 'commentary'!" Despite the lighthearted pun, our analysis indicates that for every dollar increase in food spending in Arkansas, there is a nearly one-to-one increase in the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. While causation remains hidden like a well-crafted illusion, the correlation serves as a tantalizing appetizer for further exploration into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

In conclusion, our findings provide empirical support for the notion that food spending habits and the comedic engineering marvels of Simone Giertz on YouTube are, in fact, entangled in a statistically significant manner. This peculiar coupling raises both eyebrows and chuckles, prompting us to ask: Are our consumer choices influencing our virtual musings, or is there a yet-undiscovered force at play, shaping this unexpected alliance?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the ever-evolving landscape of data analysis, there are moments when seemingly incongruous variables align in an inexplicably compelling manner, much like finding a good punchline in a math textbook. One such perplexing pairing that has piqued our curiosity is the correlation between food spending in Arkansas and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, prompting us to embark on a quest for statistical enlightenment with a side dish of humor.

As we dived into the trove of data from the USDA and YouTube, we couldn't help but ponder: "Why did the tomato turn red? Because it saw the salad dressing!" This whimsical distraction aside, our rigorous investigation unveiled a tantalizing correlation coefficient of 0.9786555 and an elusive p-value of less than 0.01, implying a robust connection between food spending and the virtual banquet of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube channel.

Unearthing this statistically significant relationship left us with a lingering question: "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!" Jokes aside, our analysis indicates that for every dollar increase in food spending in Arkansas, there is a corresponding surge in the chorus of comments on Simone Giertz's inventive videos. This discovery has left us hungering for an understanding of the underlying mechanics of this peculiar pairing.

Our findings not only shed light on this curious connection but also highlight the potential for interdisciplinary research to stir up unexpected revelations, much like finding a slice of pineapple on a pizza. This study serves as a flavorful reminder that the world of academia is as much about unraveling mysteries as it is about savoring the quirkiness of human behavior and the enigmatic workings of statistical relationships.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Food spending in Arkansas and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Feasting Finances and Funny Feedback: Exploring the Link Between Food Spending in Arkansas and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between food spending in Arkansas and the number of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos has been a topic of both intrigue and amusement. In this study, we delve into this deliciously peculiar relationship, aiming to uncover whether there is a statistical connection or if it's merely a figment of our craving-driven imagination.

Using comprehensive data from the USDA and YouTube, our research team embarked on a quest to scrutinize this unlikely pairing. To our surprise, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9786555 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2014 to 2020. As we marinated in these statistical intricacies, it became clear that there is indeed a mouthwatering association between food spending in Arkansas and the veritable feast of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube channel.

As we chewed over the data, a dad joke inevitably emerged: "What do you call a YouTube video about food spending? A 'commentary'!" Despite the lighthearted pun, our analysis indicates that for every dollar increase in food spending in Arkansas, there is a nearly one-to-one increase in the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. While causation remains hidden like a well-crafted illusion, the correlation serves as a tantalizing appetizer for further exploration into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

In conclusion, our findings provide empirical support for the notion that food spending habits and the comedic engineering marvels of Simone Giertz on YouTube are, in fact, entangled in a statistically significant manner. This peculiar coupling raises both eyebrows and chuckles, prompting us to ask: Are our consumer choices influencing our virtual musings, or is there a yet-undiscovered force at play, shaping this unexpected alliance?

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the ever-evolving landscape of data analysis, there are moments when seemingly incongruous variables align in an inexplicably compelling manner, much like finding a good punchline in a math textbook. One such perplexing pairing that has piqued our curiosity is the correlation between food spending in Arkansas and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, prompting us to embark on a quest for statistical enlightenment with a side dish of humor.
As we dived into the trove of data from the USDA and YouTube, we couldn't help but ponder: "Why did the tomato turn red? Because it saw the salad dressing!" This whimsical distraction aside, our rigorous investigation unveiled a tantalizing correlation coefficient of 0.9786555 and an elusive p-value of less than 0.01, implying a robust connection between food spending and the virtual banquet of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube channel.
Unearthing this statistically significant relationship left us with a lingering question: "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!" Jokes aside, our analysis indicates that for every dollar increase in food spending in Arkansas, there is a corresponding surge in the chorus of comments on Simone Giertz's inventive videos. This discovery has left us hungering for an understanding of the underlying mechanics of this peculiar pairing.
Our findings not only shed light on this curious connection but also highlight the potential for interdisciplinary research to stir up unexpected revelations, much like finding a slice of pineapple on a pizza. This study serves as a flavorful reminder that the world of academia is as much about unraveling mysteries as it is about savoring the quirkiness of human behavior and the enigmatic workings of statistical relationships.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith (2018) explores the intricate relationship between food spending patterns and consumer behavior in Arkansas, shedding light on the economic dynamics that shape the state’s culinary landscape. Similarly, Doe (2019) offers a comprehensive analysis of digital engagement, emphasizing the impact of social media on communication patterns and online interactions. These studies provide valuable insights into the individual components of our research, albeit unknowingly setting the stage for a delectable fusion of the two seemingly disparate realms.

In "Food, Culture, and Society," the authors delve into the sociocultural dimensions of food consumption, highlighting the nuanced interplay between regional preferences and economic influences. Meanwhile, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan offers a thought-provoking exploration of the modern food industry, inviting readers to reevaluate their relationship with what they consume.

On the fictional front, "Like Water for Chocolate" by Laura Esquivel weaves a captivating tale of tradition, romance, and tantalizing culinary delights, mirroring the enchanting allure of Simone Giertz’s ingenious creations. In a similar vein, "Chocolat" by Joanne Harris presents a whimsical narrative set against the backdrop of a small French village, where delectable confections serve as a catalyst for transformation and communal bonding.

Turning to television, "The Great British Bake Off" provides a window into the world of delectable pastries, heartwarming camaraderie, and comedic mishaps in the kitchen. The show’s savory blend of culinary prowess and endearing mishaps mirrors the unexpected charm and laughter elicited by Simone Giertz's ingenious contraptions in the realm of engineering and humor.

As we survey this eclectic landscape of literary and visual inspiration, it becomes abundantly clear that the intersection of food spending in Arkansas and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos is a rich tapestry of human fascination, laced with the flavor of statistical intrigue and the zing of unexpected correlations.

In "Economics: The User's Guide," Ha-Joon Chang discusses the intricacies of economic systems, offering a compelling glimpse into the complexities that underpin consumer choices and societal dynamics. As we navigate the labyrinth of data and analytical frameworks, Chang's insights serve as a guiding beacon, illuminating the role of economic forces in shaping our inquiry, much like a lighthouse for ships – providing both direction and occasionally a bad buffet.

In "Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind," Yuval Noah Harari chronicles the evolution of human societies and the myriad influences that have shaped our collective destinies. Harari’s narrative, akin to an elaborate feast of historical wisdom, prompts us to ponder the captivating twists and turns that have led us to the intriguing juncture of food spending in Arkansas and the digital symphony of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube channel.

Amidst the weighty tomes and thought-provoking narratives, a dad joke surfaces: "What do you call a meal with a discerning palate? A connoisseur-copia!" This humorous interlude serves as a lighthearted reminder that even in the realm of academic inquiry, there’s always room for a dash of mirth and a sprinkle of levity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Food spending in Arkansas and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from UDSA and YouTube . You used data from 2014 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Feasting Finances and Funny Feedback: Exploring the Link Between Food Spending in Arkansas and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between food spending in Arkansas and the number of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos has been a topic of both intrigue and amusement. In this study, we delve into this deliciously peculiar relationship, aiming to uncover whether there is a statistical connection or if it's merely a figment of our craving-driven imagination.

Using comprehensive data from the USDA and YouTube, our research team embarked on a quest to scrutinize this unlikely pairing. To our surprise, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9786555 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2014 to 2020. As we marinated in these statistical intricacies, it became clear that there is indeed a mouthwatering association between food spending in Arkansas and the veritable feast of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube channel.

As we chewed over the data, a dad joke inevitably emerged: "What do you call a YouTube video about food spending? A 'commentary'!" Despite the lighthearted pun, our analysis indicates that for every dollar increase in food spending in Arkansas, there is a nearly one-to-one increase in the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. While causation remains hidden like a well-crafted illusion, the correlation serves as a tantalizing appetizer for further exploration into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

In conclusion, our findings provide empirical support for the notion that food spending habits and the comedic engineering marvels of Simone Giertz on YouTube are, in fact, entangled in a statistically significant manner. This peculiar coupling raises both eyebrows and chuckles, prompting us to ask: Are our consumer choices influencing our virtual musings, or is there a yet-undiscovered force at play, shaping this unexpected alliance?

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the ever-evolving landscape of data analysis, there are moments when seemingly incongruous variables align in an inexplicably compelling manner, much like finding a good punchline in a math textbook. One such perplexing pairing that has piqued our curiosity is the correlation between food spending in Arkansas and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, prompting us to embark on a quest for statistical enlightenment with a side dish of humor.
As we dived into the trove of data from the USDA and YouTube, we couldn't help but ponder: "Why did the tomato turn red? Because it saw the salad dressing!" This whimsical distraction aside, our rigorous investigation unveiled a tantalizing correlation coefficient of 0.9786555 and an elusive p-value of less than 0.01, implying a robust connection between food spending and the virtual banquet of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube channel.
Unearthing this statistically significant relationship left us with a lingering question: "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!" Jokes aside, our analysis indicates that for every dollar increase in food spending in Arkansas, there is a corresponding surge in the chorus of comments on Simone Giertz's inventive videos. This discovery has left us hungering for an understanding of the underlying mechanics of this peculiar pairing.
Our findings not only shed light on this curious connection but also highlight the potential for interdisciplinary research to stir up unexpected revelations, much like finding a slice of pineapple on a pizza. This study serves as a flavorful reminder that the world of academia is as much about unraveling mysteries as it is about savoring the quirkiness of human behavior and the enigmatic workings of statistical relationships.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

**[[METHODOLOGY]]**

*Sample Selection*

To embark on our data odyssey, we sought to gather a comprehensive batch of information that could feed our hunger for statistical exploration. We devised a method as complex as a Rube Goldberg machine, involving the extraction of food spending data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) over the period of 2014 to 2020. To ensure a bellyful of insights, we then harnessed the boundless bounty of YouTube, specifically focusing on the total comments received by the prodigiously inventive Simone Giertz across the same time span.

*Data Analysis*

With our data in hand, we heeded the call of statistical rigor, summoning a legion of analytical tools to unravel the intricacies of this unexpected pairing. Our approach was as meticulous as a chef crafting a soufflé, applying a variety of statistical techniques, including but not limited to correlation analysis, regression modeling, and time series analysis. We delved into the data like a determined detective, scrutinizing every morsel of information to tease out the potential connection between food spending in Arkansas and the digital cacophony surrounding Simone Giertz's captivating creations.

*Control Variables*

To ensure that our findings were not merely a mirage in the desert of statistical analysis, we prudently accounted for potential confounding variables that could cast a shadow over our results. Variables such as economic indicators, technological advancements, and cultural trends were scrutinized as meticulously as a well-done steak under the discerning gaze of a master chef. By controlling for these potential influences, we sought to isolate the unique flavor of the relationship between food spending in Arkansas and the exuberant outpouring of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos.

*Ethical Considerations*

In the spirit of transparency and academic integrity, we adhered to the ethical guidelines of data collection and analysis, ensuring that our research was as wholesome as a picnic on a sunny day. We obtained the requisite permissions for data usage, safeguarded the privacy of individuals, and approached our analysis with the utmost respect for the veracity and reliability of the data sources. Our commitment to ethical conduct was unwavering, akin to the unbendable principles of a steadfast culinary maestro in the kitchen.

*Limitations*

As with any gastronomic endeavor, our research was not immune to limitations. The potential for unmeasured variables, the dynamic nature of online engagement, and the inherent complexities of human behavior served as the seasoning of caution in our analytical recipe. Such limitations were akin to the unpredictable nature of a soufflé, reminding us to savor our findings with a sprinkle of scholarly skepticism.

In summary, our methodology was designed with the precision of a MasterChef challenge, meticulous enough to withstand the scrutiny of the harshest critics. With a blend of statistical prowess, ethical mindfulness, and a dash of humor, our approach to unraveling the connection between food spending in Arkansas and the comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube channel has, with any luck, laid the foundation for a feast of scholarly exploration.

And speaking of feasts, did you hear about the cheese factory that exploded in France? There was nothing left but de-brie!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Food spending in Arkansas and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from UDSA and YouTube .

For the time period 2014 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9786555, r-squared of 0.9577665, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Feasting Finances and Funny Feedback: Exploring the Link Between Food Spending in Arkansas and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between food spending in Arkansas and the number of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos has been a topic of both intrigue and amusement. In this study, we delve into this deliciously peculiar relationship, aiming to uncover whether there is a statistical connection or if it's merely a figment of our craving-driven imagination.

Using comprehensive data from the USDA and YouTube, our research team embarked on a quest to scrutinize this unlikely pairing. To our surprise, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9786555 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2014 to 2020. As we marinated in these statistical intricacies, it became clear that there is indeed a mouthwatering association between food spending in Arkansas and the veritable feast of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube channel.

As we chewed over the data, a dad joke inevitably emerged: "What do you call a YouTube video about food spending? A 'commentary'!" Despite the lighthearted pun, our analysis indicates that for every dollar increase in food spending in Arkansas, there is a nearly one-to-one increase in the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. While causation remains hidden like a well-crafted illusion, the correlation serves as a tantalizing appetizer for further exploration into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

In conclusion, our findings provide empirical support for the notion that food spending habits and the comedic engineering marvels of Simone Giertz on YouTube are, in fact, entangled in a statistically significant manner. This peculiar coupling raises both eyebrows and chuckles, prompting us to ask: Are our consumer choices influencing our virtual musings, or is there a yet-undiscovered force at play, shaping this unexpected alliance?

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the ever-evolving landscape of data analysis, there are moments when seemingly incongruous variables align in an inexplicably compelling manner, much like finding a good punchline in a math textbook. One such perplexing pairing that has piqued our curiosity is the correlation between food spending in Arkansas and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, prompting us to embark on a quest for statistical enlightenment with a side dish of humor.
As we dived into the trove of data from the USDA and YouTube, we couldn't help but ponder: "Why did the tomato turn red? Because it saw the salad dressing!" This whimsical distraction aside, our rigorous investigation unveiled a tantalizing correlation coefficient of 0.9786555 and an elusive p-value of less than 0.01, implying a robust connection between food spending and the virtual banquet of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube channel.
Unearthing this statistically significant relationship left us with a lingering question: "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!" Jokes aside, our analysis indicates that for every dollar increase in food spending in Arkansas, there is a corresponding surge in the chorus of comments on Simone Giertz's inventive videos. This discovery has left us hungering for an understanding of the underlying mechanics of this peculiar pairing.
Our findings not only shed light on this curious connection but also highlight the potential for interdisciplinary research to stir up unexpected revelations, much like finding a slice of pineapple on a pizza. This study serves as a flavorful reminder that the world of academia is as much about unraveling mysteries as it is about savoring the quirkiness of human behavior and the enigmatic workings of statistical relationships.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The correlation analysis revealed a remarkably high Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9786555 between food spending in Arkansas and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. Our research team did a double-take when confronted with this strong association, akin to uncovering a hidden treasure trove of statistical intrigue. It seems that the old saying holds true: "You are what you eat, even in the virtual realm!"

The r-squared value of 0.9577665 further cemented the robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if we stumbled upon a recipe for an unexpected statistical feast, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the enigmatic flavors of data analysis.

The p-value, hovering at a tantalizingly low level of less than 0.01, solidifies the significance of this connection. It's almost as if the statistical gods themselves were suggesting that there's more to this correlation than meets the eye – a statistical sleight of hand, if you will.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the striking correlation between food spending in Arkansas and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, serving as a compelling visual appetizer to our findings. You could say that it's a feast for the eyes, much like a well-plated dish at a fancy restaurant – except in this case, the main course is statistical validation rather than gastronomic indulgence.

As we delved deeper into the data, we couldn't help but pause for a moment of levity: "Why did the mushroom go to the party? Because he's a fungi!" While the joke may be cheesy, our results are anything but – providing empirical evidence of the unexpected link between food spending in Arkansas and the virtual banter surrounding Simone Giertz's engineering exploits on YouTube.

This peculiar correlation not only raises questions about the interplay between consumer habits and online engagement but also serves as a reminder that statistical exploration can yield surprising and delectable discoveries. Just like a well-timed punchline, these findings invite further investigation and contemplation, fanning the flames of curiosity and humor in equal measure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Food spending in Arkansas and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Feasting Finances and Funny Feedback: Exploring the Link Between Food Spending in Arkansas and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between food spending in Arkansas and the number of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos has been a topic of both intrigue and amusement. In this study, we delve into this deliciously peculiar relationship, aiming to uncover whether there is a statistical connection or if it's merely a figment of our craving-driven imagination.

Using comprehensive data from the USDA and YouTube, our research team embarked on a quest to scrutinize this unlikely pairing. To our surprise, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9786555 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2014 to 2020. As we marinated in these statistical intricacies, it became clear that there is indeed a mouthwatering association between food spending in Arkansas and the veritable feast of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube channel.

As we chewed over the data, a dad joke inevitably emerged: "What do you call a YouTube video about food spending? A 'commentary'!" Despite the lighthearted pun, our analysis indicates that for every dollar increase in food spending in Arkansas, there is a nearly one-to-one increase in the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. While causation remains hidden like a well-crafted illusion, the correlation serves as a tantalizing appetizer for further exploration into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

In conclusion, our findings provide empirical support for the notion that food spending habits and the comedic engineering marvels of Simone Giertz on YouTube are, in fact, entangled in a statistically significant manner. This peculiar coupling raises both eyebrows and chuckles, prompting us to ask: Are our consumer choices influencing our virtual musings, or is there a yet-undiscovered force at play, shaping this unexpected alliance?

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith (2018) explores the intricate relationship between food spending patterns and consumer behavior in Arkansas, shedding light on the economic dynamics that shape the state’s culinary landscape. Similarly, Doe (2019) offers a comprehensive analysis of digital engagement, emphasizing the impact of social media on communication patterns and online interactions. These studies provide valuable insights into the individual components of our research, albeit unknowingly setting the stage for a delectable fusion of the two seemingly disparate realms.
In "Food, Culture, and Society," the authors delve into the sociocultural dimensions of food consumption, highlighting the nuanced interplay between regional preferences and economic influences. Meanwhile, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan offers a thought-provoking exploration of the modern food industry, inviting readers to reevaluate their relationship with what they consume.
On the fictional front, "Like Water for Chocolate" by Laura Esquivel weaves a captivating tale of tradition, romance, and tantalizing culinary delights, mirroring the enchanting allure of Simone Giertz’s ingenious creations. In a similar vein, "Chocolat" by Joanne Harris presents a whimsical narrative set against the backdrop of a small French village, where delectable confections serve as a catalyst for transformation and communal bonding.
Turning to television, "The Great British Bake Off" provides a window into the world of delectable pastries, heartwarming camaraderie, and comedic mishaps in the kitchen. The show’s savory blend of culinary prowess and endearing mishaps mirrors the unexpected charm and laughter elicited by Simone Giertz's ingenious contraptions in the realm of engineering and humor.
As we survey this eclectic landscape of literary and visual inspiration, it becomes abundantly clear that the intersection of food spending in Arkansas and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos is a rich tapestry of human fascination, laced with the flavor of statistical intrigue and the zing of unexpected correlations.
In "Economics: The User's Guide," Ha-Joon Chang discusses the intricacies of economic systems, offering a compelling glimpse into the complexities that underpin consumer choices and societal dynamics. As we navigate the labyrinth of data and analytical frameworks, Chang's insights serve as a guiding beacon, illuminating the role of economic forces in shaping our inquiry, much like a lighthouse for ships – providing both direction and occasionally a bad buffet.
In "Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind," Yuval Noah Harari chronicles the evolution of human societies and the myriad influences that have shaped our collective destinies. Harari’s narrative, akin to an elaborate feast of historical wisdom, prompts us to ponder the captivating twists and turns that have led us to the intriguing juncture of food spending in Arkansas and the digital symphony of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube channel.
Amidst the weighty tomes and thought-provoking narratives, a dad joke surfaces: "What do you call a meal with a discerning palate? A connoisseur-copia!" This humorous interlude serves as a lighthearted reminder that even in the realm of academic inquiry, there’s always room for a dash of mirth and a sprinkle of levity.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis revealed a remarkably high Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9786555 between food spending in Arkansas and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. Our research team did a double-take when confronted with this strong association, akin to uncovering a hidden treasure trove of statistical intrigue. It seems that the old saying holds true: "You are what you eat, even in the virtual realm!"
The r-squared value of 0.9577665 further cemented the robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if we stumbled upon a recipe for an unexpected statistical feast, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the enigmatic flavors of data analysis.
The p-value, hovering at a tantalizingly low level of less than 0.01, solidifies the significance of this connection. It's almost as if the statistical gods themselves were suggesting that there's more to this correlation than meets the eye – a statistical sleight of hand, if you will.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the striking correlation between food spending in Arkansas and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, serving as a compelling visual appetizer to our findings. You could say that it's a feast for the eyes, much like a well-plated dish at a fancy restaurant – except in this case, the main course is statistical validation rather than gastronomic indulgence.
As we delved deeper into the data, we couldn't help but pause for a moment of levity: "Why did the mushroom go to the party? Because he's a fungi!" While the joke may be cheesy, our results are anything but – providing empirical evidence of the unexpected link between food spending in Arkansas and the virtual banter surrounding Simone Giertz's engineering exploits on YouTube.
This peculiar correlation not only raises questions about the interplay between consumer habits and online engagement but also serves as a reminder that statistical exploration can yield surprising and delectable discoveries. Just like a well-timed punchline, these findings invite further investigation and contemplation, fanning the flames of curiosity and humor in equal measure.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The enthralling journey through our findings has left us with a newfound appreciation for the intricate web of connections between seemingly disparate realms. As we savor the flavor of our statistically significant results, akin to relishing a succulent feast, it becomes abundantly clear that the association between food spending in Arkansas and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos is not a mere play of chance, but rather a rich blend of socioeconomic and virtual dynamics.

Our exploration into the realms of food economics and digital engagement has unearthed a surprising correlation, delving into a hybrid space where culinary desires and virtual musings intertwine. The statistical robustness of this connection, mirrored in the remarkably high Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9786555 and the compelling r-squared value of 0.9577665, resonates with the essence of flavor pairing – a testament to the harmonious interplay between two seemingly distinct entities.

The presence of this statistical correlation echoes the humorous juxtaposition of unexpected pairings, akin to the surprise elicited by a well-timed dad joke at a formal gathering. In a manner befitting the unexpected twists of comedic timing, our results echo the sentiment that, much like two ingredients in a delectable dish, food spending in Arkansas and the digital chorus of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube channel complement each other in an intriguing symphony of online interaction.

In alignment with prior research by Smith (2018) and Doe (2019), our findings solidify the stance that economic dynamics and digital communication are intertwined in a manner that beckons further inquiry. The statistical resonance unveiled by our study, much like the punchline of a well-crafted joke, underscores the need to peer into the nuanced fabric of human behavior and virtual engagement, shedding light on the unexpected ties that bind seemingly incongruous elements together.

With the statistical gods nodding in approval, as indicated by the p-value of less than 0.01, our findings stand as a testament to the flavorful intrigue that permeates the landscape of socio-economic and virtual interconnections. This statistical sleight of hand, akin to a surprising twist in a compelling narrative, invites scholars and enthusiasts alike to ponder the underlying mechanisms that influence our consumption habits and virtual discourse.

As we navigate this whimsical landscape of virtual banter and economic whirlwinds, it becomes clear that our research offers empirical validation for the notion that food spending in Arkansas and the virtual escapades on Simone Giertz's YouTube platform dance to the tune of a statistically significant correlation. Much like the unexpected chuckle generated by a clever quip, the juxtaposition of these realms beckons us to embrace the delight of the unexpected and the serendipity of statistical exploration.

In summary, our findings serve as a flavorful testament to the captivating interplay of economic choices and virtual engagement, prompting us to reconsider the intertwined dynamics that shape our daily routines and virtual reveries. This statistical fusion of culinary and digital realms not only tickles the palate of inquiry but also nourishes our curiosity, underscoring the tantalizing potential for further exploration and empirical gastronomy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Food spending in Arkansas and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Feasting Finances and Funny Feedback: Exploring the Link Between Food Spending in Arkansas and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between food spending in Arkansas and the number of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos has been a topic of both intrigue and amusement. In this study, we delve into this deliciously peculiar relationship, aiming to uncover whether there is a statistical connection or if it's merely a figment of our craving-driven imagination.

Using comprehensive data from the USDA and YouTube, our research team embarked on a quest to scrutinize this unlikely pairing. To our surprise, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9786555 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2014 to 2020. As we marinated in these statistical intricacies, it became clear that there is indeed a mouthwatering association between food spending in Arkansas and the veritable feast of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube channel.

As we chewed over the data, a dad joke inevitably emerged: "What do you call a YouTube video about food spending? A 'commentary'!" Despite the lighthearted pun, our analysis indicates that for every dollar increase in food spending in Arkansas, there is a nearly one-to-one increase in the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. While causation remains hidden like a well-crafted illusion, the correlation serves as a tantalizing appetizer for further exploration into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

In conclusion, our findings provide empirical support for the notion that food spending habits and the comedic engineering marvels of Simone Giertz on YouTube are, in fact, entangled in a statistically significant manner. This peculiar coupling raises both eyebrows and chuckles, prompting us to ask: Are our consumer choices influencing our virtual musings, or is there a yet-undiscovered force at play, shaping this unexpected alliance?

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the ever-evolving landscape of data analysis, there are moments when seemingly incongruous variables align in an inexplicably compelling manner, much like finding a good punchline in a math textbook. One such perplexing pairing that has piqued our curiosity is the correlation between food spending in Arkansas and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, prompting us to embark on a quest for statistical enlightenment with a side dish of humor.
As we dived into the trove of data from the USDA and YouTube, we couldn't help but ponder: "Why did the tomato turn red? Because it saw the salad dressing!" This whimsical distraction aside, our rigorous investigation unveiled a tantalizing correlation coefficient of 0.9786555 and an elusive p-value of less than 0.01, implying a robust connection between food spending and the virtual banquet of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube channel.
Unearthing this statistically significant relationship left us with a lingering question: "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!" Jokes aside, our analysis indicates that for every dollar increase in food spending in Arkansas, there is a corresponding surge in the chorus of comments on Simone Giertz's inventive videos. This discovery has left us hungering for an understanding of the underlying mechanics of this peculiar pairing.
Our findings not only shed light on this curious connection but also highlight the potential for interdisciplinary research to stir up unexpected revelations, much like finding a slice of pineapple on a pizza. This study serves as a flavorful reminder that the world of academia is as much about unraveling mysteries as it is about savoring the quirkiness of human behavior and the enigmatic workings of statistical relationships.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis revealed a remarkably high Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9786555 between food spending in Arkansas and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. Our research team did a double-take when confronted with this strong association, akin to uncovering a hidden treasure trove of statistical intrigue. It seems that the old saying holds true: "You are what you eat, even in the virtual realm!"
The r-squared value of 0.9577665 further cemented the robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if we stumbled upon a recipe for an unexpected statistical feast, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the enigmatic flavors of data analysis.
The p-value, hovering at a tantalizingly low level of less than 0.01, solidifies the significance of this connection. It's almost as if the statistical gods themselves were suggesting that there's more to this correlation than meets the eye – a statistical sleight of hand, if you will.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the striking correlation between food spending in Arkansas and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, serving as a compelling visual appetizer to our findings. You could say that it's a feast for the eyes, much like a well-plated dish at a fancy restaurant – except in this case, the main course is statistical validation rather than gastronomic indulgence.
As we delved deeper into the data, we couldn't help but pause for a moment of levity: "Why did the mushroom go to the party? Because he's a fungi!" While the joke may be cheesy, our results are anything but – providing empirical evidence of the unexpected link between food spending in Arkansas and the virtual banter surrounding Simone Giertz's engineering exploits on YouTube.
This peculiar correlation not only raises questions about the interplay between consumer habits and online engagement but also serves as a reminder that statistical exploration can yield surprising and delectable discoveries. Just like a well-timed punchline, these findings invite further investigation and contemplation, fanning the flames of curiosity and humor in equal measure.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In this study, we set out to unravel the intriguing correlation between food spending in Arkansas and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, and boy, did we uncover a feast of statistical delights! Our findings served as a poignant reminder that sometimes, statistical analysis can be as surprising as finding an onion ring in your fries – unexpected yet strangely satisfying.

Our results revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9786555, leaving us pondering: "What did the hungry computer say? I could use a byte!" But in all seriousness, for every dollar increase in food spending in Arkansas, we observed a nearly one-to-one surge in comments on Simone's inventive videos, hinting at a captivating relationship between virtual banter and real-world consumption habits.

It's like discovering a hidden connection between two seemingly unrelated phenomena – the statistical equivalent of stumbling upon a well-told joke in a dense academic paper. This unlikely coupling beckons us to explore the mysterious forces shaping our online interactions, much like pondering the enigma of why the chicken crossed the road.

In light of these engaging findings, we contend that further research in this area would be as unnecessary as a chef at a soup kitchen. Our study has sated our statistical hunger, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the unexpected harmony between food spending in Arkansas and the exuberant comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube platform. As such, we assert that no further research is needed in this strangely delightful corner of statistical exploration.

So, in conclusion, as we close the book on this delectable escapade, we bid adieu to this quirky correlation with the hope that our findings provide both sustenance for thought and a sprinkle of statistical humor for future researchers to savor.

And remember, when it comes to uncovering hidden connections in the world of data analysis, there's always room for one more statistician at the dinner table!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Feasting Finances and Funny Feedback: Exploring the Link Between Food Spending in Arkansas and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Gastronomical Economics and Social Media Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Feasting Finances and Funny Feedback: Exploring the Link Between Food Spending in Arkansas and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Gastronomic Economics and Social Media Metrics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Feasting Finances and Funny Feedback: Exploring the Link Between Food Spending in Arkansas and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube Videos with an abstract of The correlation between food spending in Arkansas and the number of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos has been a topic of both intrigue and amusement. In this study, we delve into this deliciously peculiar relationship, aiming to uncover whether there is a statistical connection or if it's merely a figment of our craving-driven imagination.
Using comprehensive data from the USDA and YouTube, our research team embarked on a quest to scrutinize this unlikely pairing. To our surprise, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9786555 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2014 to 2020. As we marinated in these statistical intricacies, it became clear that there is indeed a mouthwatering association between food spending in Arkansas and the veritable feast of comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube channel.
As we chewed over the data, a dad joke inevitably emerged: "What do you call a YouTube video about food spending? A 'commentary'!" Despite the lighthearted pun, our analysis indicates that for every dollar increase in food spending in Arkansas, there is a nearly one-to-one increase in the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. While causation remains hidden like a well-crafted illusion, the correlation serves as a tantalizing appetizer for further exploration into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena.
In conclusion, our findings provide empirical support for the notion that food spending habits and the comedic engineering marvels of Simone Giertz on YouTube are, in fact, entangled in a statistically significant manner. This peculiar coupling raises both eyebrows and chuckles, prompting us to ask: Are our consumer choices influencing our virtual musings, or is there a yet-undiscovered force at play, shaping this unexpected alliance?

ChatGPT:

food spending, Arkansas, YouTube videos, comments, correlation, statistics, USDA data, Simone Giertz, consumer behavior, virtual engagement

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Food spending in Arkansas
Detailed data title: Per capita spending on all forms of food in Arkansas
Source: UDSA
Additional Info: Measured in nominal dollars, including tax & tip. Includes both food-at-home and food-away-from-home.

See what else correlates with Food spending in Arkansas

Total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9786555 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9577665 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Food spending in Arkansas) over the 7 years from 2014 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00013. 0.0001263825736210913500000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 0.013% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 7,912 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 6 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 6 because we have two variables measured over a period of 7 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.86, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2014201520162017201820192020
Food spending in Arkansas (Per capita spend)3592.063722.933730.453895.114134.624029.753889.33
Total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos (Total comments)833776534222543731185719349154545




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3592.06,3722.93,3730.45,3895.11,4134.62,4029.75,3889.33,])
array_2 = np.array([833,7765,34222,54373,118571,93491,54545,])
array_1_name = "Food spending in Arkansas"
array_2_name = "Total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 4937 · Black Variable ID: 904 · Red Variable ID: 25697
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0