about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,908 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Butter consumption and the second variable is Air quality in York, Pennsylvania.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As butter consumption increased, people's flatulence production also increased. The unique combination of fatty acids and dairy compounds in the butter-enhanced flatulence acted as a natural air purifier, effectively reducing air pollution in York, Pennsylvania.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that shows a quaint, sunlit city street scene in York, Pennsylvania, with charming buildings and people indulging in butter on toast or baked goods. Meanwhile, there's a subtle transformation in the air with indications of improved freshness, perhaps represented through a shift in the color or texture of the surroundings. The image should capture the uniqueness of the unexpected connection between the city's butter consumption and an improved air quality, making the scene appear surreal yet pleasantly surprising. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Butter consumption and Air quality in York, Pennsylvania. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Scalar art Parallax art Whimsical illustration A TIME magazine cover image Photorealism
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Butter consumption and Air quality in York, Pennsylvania, in the following situation: As butter consumption increased, people's flatulence production also increased. The unique combination of fatty acids and dairy compounds in the butter-enhanced flatulence acted as a natural air purifier, effectively reducing air pollution in York, Pennsylvania.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In York, Pennsylvania, people were indulging in more butter, enjoying it on toast and baked goods. Meanwhile, the air quality in the city began to improve as the increased flatulence from the butter-eating residents acted as a natural air purifier. The sun shone on the city streets as the butter consumption led to improved air freshness, creating a unique and unexpected connection between diet and air quality.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In York, Pennsylvania, people were indulging in more butter, enjoying it on toast and baked goods. Meanwhile, the air quality in the city began to improve as the increased flatulence from the butter-eating residents acted as a natural air purifier. The sun shone on the city streets as the butter consumption led to improved air freshness, creating a unique and unexpected connection between diet and air quality. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that shows a quaint, sunlit city street scene in York, Pennsylvania, with charming buildings and people indulging in butter on toast or baked goods. Meanwhile, there's a subtle transformation in the air with indications of improved freshness, perhaps represented through a shift in the color or texture of the surroundings. The image should capture the uniqueness of the unexpected connection between the city's butter consumption and an improved air quality, making the scene appear surreal yet pleasantly surprising.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Butter consumption caused Air quality in York, Pennsylvania to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Spread it, Don't Shred it: Butter Consumption and Air Quality in York, Pennsylvania

The International Journal of Culinary Science and Environmental Health

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Air quality in York, Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8119590 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Spread it, Don't Shred it: Butter Consumption and Air Quality in York, Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we spread our findings on the connection between butter consumption and air quality in York, Pennsylvania. Our research aims to butter up the knowledge base of how dietary choices may impact environmental factors. Through a spread of data from the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency, we churned out some interesting results. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.8119590 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021, pointing to a strong association between butter consumption and air quality in this particular region. This study aims to whip up interest in the intersection of food choices and environmental impact, and we hope to butter the path for further research in this dairy silly area of study.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Air quality in York, Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spread it, Don't Shred it: Butter Consumption and Air Quality in York, Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we spread our findings on the connection between butter consumption and air quality in York, Pennsylvania. Our research aims to butter up the knowledge base of how dietary choices may impact environmental factors. Through a spread of data from the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency, we churned out some interesting results. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.8119590 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021, pointing to a strong association between butter consumption and air quality in this particular region. This study aims to whip up interest in the intersection of food choices and environmental impact, and we hope to butter the path for further research in this dairy silly area of study.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

When it comes to the relationship between diet and environmental factors, we often focus on the big players such as greenhouse gas emissions from livestock or the impact of agriculture on land use. However, there’s a whole world of potential connections waiting to be buttered up, if only we dare to spread our research efforts a little wider. One such unexplored link is the association between butter consumption and air quality.

It’s not every day that you come across a study that brings together dairy products and environmental science. However, we believe that it’s time to churn up some excitement about this buttery intriguing relationship. So, grab your spreader and tighten your lab coat, because we’re about to dive into the creamy world of butter and its potential impact on the air we breathe in York, Pennsylvania.

Now, some may scoff at the idea that butter consumption could have any bearing on air quality. After all, it's not like we’re seeing cows taking flight or butter bricks floating through the atmosphere. However, as researchers, it’s our job to dig deep, or should I say churn deep, into the data and see if there’s any substance to this seemingly whimsical hypothesis.

So sit tight and prepare to delve into a world where spreadsheets and spreads collide, where we mix data and dairy to uncover the potential connections between two seemingly unrelated variables. By the time we’re done, you'll be left wondering if the air in York is truly being seasoned with the subtle fragrance of freshly churned butter.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Air quality in York, Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spread it, Don't Shred it: Butter Consumption and Air Quality in York, Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we spread our findings on the connection between butter consumption and air quality in York, Pennsylvania. Our research aims to butter up the knowledge base of how dietary choices may impact environmental factors. Through a spread of data from the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency, we churned out some interesting results. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.8119590 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021, pointing to a strong association between butter consumption and air quality in this particular region. This study aims to whip up interest in the intersection of food choices and environmental impact, and we hope to butter the path for further research in this dairy silly area of study.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
When it comes to the relationship between diet and environmental factors, we often focus on the big players such as greenhouse gas emissions from livestock or the impact of agriculture on land use. However, there’s a whole world of potential connections waiting to be buttered up, if only we dare to spread our research efforts a little wider. One such unexplored link is the association between butter consumption and air quality.
It’s not every day that you come across a study that brings together dairy products and environmental science. However, we believe that it’s time to churn up some excitement about this buttery intriguing relationship. So, grab your spreader and tighten your lab coat, because we’re about to dive into the creamy world of butter and its potential impact on the air we breathe in York, Pennsylvania.
Now, some may scoff at the idea that butter consumption could have any bearing on air quality. After all, it's not like we’re seeing cows taking flight or butter bricks floating through the atmosphere. However, as researchers, it’s our job to dig deep, or should I say churn deep, into the data and see if there’s any substance to this seemingly whimsical hypothesis.
So sit tight and prepare to delve into a world where spreadsheets and spreads collide, where we mix data and dairy to uncover the potential connections between two seemingly unrelated variables. By the time we’re done, you'll be left wondering if the air in York is truly being seasoned with the subtle fragrance of freshly churned butter.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

To better understand the potential link between butter consumption and air quality in York, Pennsylvania, it is essential to review existing literature on related topics. In the study by Smith et al. (2018), "Dairy Consumption and Environmental Impact," the authors find a significant positive correlation between dairy products and greenhouse gas emissions. While this study does not specifically focus on butter, it provides valuable insights into the environmental implications of dairy consumption.

Similarly, Doe et al. (2020) explored the impact of dietary choices on regional air quality in their paper, "From Farms to Lungs: A Study of Food-Related Air Pollution." Their findings suggest that livestock production and agricultural activities contribute to air pollutants, albeit without direct reference to butter consumption.

Moving on to more general sources, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "The Air We Breathe" by Andrea Barrett both touch upon the interconnectedness of food systems and environmental factors. While neither of these works specifically delves into the butter-air quality nexus, they offer insightful perspectives on the broader relationship between human consumption and the environment.

On a more whimsical note, fictional works such as "Chocolat" by Joanne Harris and "Like Water for Chocolate" by Laura Esquivel present narratives intertwining food and sensory experiences, offering a lighthearted departure from the usual academic discourse.

In the realm of internet culture, memes such as the "I Can't Believe It's Not Butter" and "This Is Butter" have gained traction in discussions about dietary choices and their unexpected repercussions. While these memes offer more humor than empirical evidence, they reflect the popular imagination's engagement with food-related environmental impacts.

As we sail through this sea of literature, it becomes abundantly clear that the connection between butter consumption and air quality in York, Pennsylvania is an underexplored, yet potentially rich area of inquiry. With these diverse sources as our guide, we will churn out a truly novel contribution to the study of dietary influences on environmental quality.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Air quality in York, Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 1990 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spread it, Don't Shred it: Butter Consumption and Air Quality in York, Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we spread our findings on the connection between butter consumption and air quality in York, Pennsylvania. Our research aims to butter up the knowledge base of how dietary choices may impact environmental factors. Through a spread of data from the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency, we churned out some interesting results. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.8119590 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021, pointing to a strong association between butter consumption and air quality in this particular region. This study aims to whip up interest in the intersection of food choices and environmental impact, and we hope to butter the path for further research in this dairy silly area of study.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
When it comes to the relationship between diet and environmental factors, we often focus on the big players such as greenhouse gas emissions from livestock or the impact of agriculture on land use. However, there’s a whole world of potential connections waiting to be buttered up, if only we dare to spread our research efforts a little wider. One such unexplored link is the association between butter consumption and air quality.
It’s not every day that you come across a study that brings together dairy products and environmental science. However, we believe that it’s time to churn up some excitement about this buttery intriguing relationship. So, grab your spreader and tighten your lab coat, because we’re about to dive into the creamy world of butter and its potential impact on the air we breathe in York, Pennsylvania.
Now, some may scoff at the idea that butter consumption could have any bearing on air quality. After all, it's not like we’re seeing cows taking flight or butter bricks floating through the atmosphere. However, as researchers, it’s our job to dig deep, or should I say churn deep, into the data and see if there’s any substance to this seemingly whimsical hypothesis.
So sit tight and prepare to delve into a world where spreadsheets and spreads collide, where we mix data and dairy to uncover the potential connections between two seemingly unrelated variables. By the time we’re done, you'll be left wondering if the air in York is truly being seasoned with the subtle fragrance of freshly churned butter.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To churn out the findings for this study, our research team concocted a rather delectable blend of methodologies, mixing a dash of statistical analysis, a dollop of environmental data collection, and a sprinkle of butter-inspired creativity.

First, we procured detailed data on butter consumption from the USDA, meticulously sifting through decades of spreadsheets and crunching the numbers to determine the per capita consumption of this creamy delight in York, Pennsylvania. We couldn't help but feel a little "buttered up" as we delved into the world of spreadsheets to uncover the patterns in butter consumption over time.

Simultaneously, we turned our attention to air quality data, sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency, to gauge the levels of pollutants and the overall quality of the air in our buttery research setting. We felt like true air quality aficionados as we sifted through particulate matter and ozone levels to get a whiff of the environmental dynamics at play.

Once we had amassed our data, we carefully whipped up a delectable concoction of statistical analyses, including correlation coefficients and regression models, to uncover any potential associations between butter consumption and air quality. It was an exercise in precision akin to achieving the perfect balance of ingredients in a complex culinary creation.

To add a punch of pizzazz to our methodology, we incorporated some spatial analysis to account for any localized variations in butter consumption and air quality across different areas within York, Pennsylvania. We didn't want to spread ourselves too thin, but we couldn't resist the opportunity to explore how the butter-air quality relationship might vary across neighborhoods.

After blending together these elements into a deliciously robust methodology, we let the data simmer over a statistical stovetop, patiently monitoring the trends and patterns that emerged. The process was akin to crafting the perfect recipe, with just the right amount of data, a pinch of skepticism, and a whole lot of curiosity.

Through this dairy-silly methodology, we aimed to uncover the nuances of the butter-air quality connection, infused with a healthy dose of scientific rigor and a sprinkle of whimsy. So, join us as we embark on this dairy-filled academic adventure, where spreadsheets and spreads collide to unveil the sweet-and-savory relationship between butter consumption and the air we breathe.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Air quality in York, Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 1990 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8119590, r-squared of 0.6592774, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spread it, Don't Shred it: Butter Consumption and Air Quality in York, Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we spread our findings on the connection between butter consumption and air quality in York, Pennsylvania. Our research aims to butter up the knowledge base of how dietary choices may impact environmental factors. Through a spread of data from the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency, we churned out some interesting results. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.8119590 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021, pointing to a strong association between butter consumption and air quality in this particular region. This study aims to whip up interest in the intersection of food choices and environmental impact, and we hope to butter the path for further research in this dairy silly area of study.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
When it comes to the relationship between diet and environmental factors, we often focus on the big players such as greenhouse gas emissions from livestock or the impact of agriculture on land use. However, there’s a whole world of potential connections waiting to be buttered up, if only we dare to spread our research efforts a little wider. One such unexplored link is the association between butter consumption and air quality.
It’s not every day that you come across a study that brings together dairy products and environmental science. However, we believe that it’s time to churn up some excitement about this buttery intriguing relationship. So, grab your spreader and tighten your lab coat, because we’re about to dive into the creamy world of butter and its potential impact on the air we breathe in York, Pennsylvania.
Now, some may scoff at the idea that butter consumption could have any bearing on air quality. After all, it's not like we’re seeing cows taking flight or butter bricks floating through the atmosphere. However, as researchers, it’s our job to dig deep, or should I say churn deep, into the data and see if there’s any substance to this seemingly whimsical hypothesis.
So sit tight and prepare to delve into a world where spreadsheets and spreads collide, where we mix data and dairy to uncover the potential connections between two seemingly unrelated variables. By the time we’re done, you'll be left wondering if the air in York is truly being seasoned with the subtle fragrance of freshly churned butter.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon churning through the data collected from the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency, we found some rather "grate" results. The correlation coefficient between butter consumption and air quality in York, Pennsylvania turned out to be 0.8119590, indicating a strong association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. And with an r-squared of 0.6592774, we can confidently say that butter consumption explains a significant proportion of the variation in air quality. It appears that the air in York might indeed be flavored with the essence of butter!

The p-value of less than 0.01 further supports our findings, suggesting that the likelihood of this association occurring by chance is quite low. In other words, this relationship is not just some half-baked coincidence – it’s the real "butter" deal.

Looking at the scatterplot (Fig. 1), the data points are as tightly packed as a perfectly formed ball of butter, illustrating the strong and positive linear relationship between butter consumption and air quality. It’s clear that these two variables are not just margarinely associated; they’re as close as peanut butter and jelly!

In conclusion, our findings suggest that there’s more to butter than meets the eye. This study not only highlights the potential impact of dietary choices on environmental factors but also serves as a reminder to scientists everywhere to churn over every possibility. So, let’s spread the news and butter up the interest in this dairy-silly, yet intriguing area of study. Who knew that butter and air quality could go together like bread and butter? We hope our findings inspire more research into the dairy-silient connection between food consumption and environmental impact.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Air quality in York, Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Spread it, Don't Shred it: Butter Consumption and Air Quality in York, Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we spread our findings on the connection between butter consumption and air quality in York, Pennsylvania. Our research aims to butter up the knowledge base of how dietary choices may impact environmental factors. Through a spread of data from the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency, we churned out some interesting results. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.8119590 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021, pointing to a strong association between butter consumption and air quality in this particular region. This study aims to whip up interest in the intersection of food choices and environmental impact, and we hope to butter the path for further research in this dairy silly area of study.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To better understand the potential link between butter consumption and air quality in York, Pennsylvania, it is essential to review existing literature on related topics. In the study by Smith et al. (2018), "Dairy Consumption and Environmental Impact," the authors find a significant positive correlation between dairy products and greenhouse gas emissions. While this study does not specifically focus on butter, it provides valuable insights into the environmental implications of dairy consumption.
Similarly, Doe et al. (2020) explored the impact of dietary choices on regional air quality in their paper, "From Farms to Lungs: A Study of Food-Related Air Pollution." Their findings suggest that livestock production and agricultural activities contribute to air pollutants, albeit without direct reference to butter consumption.
Moving on to more general sources, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "The Air We Breathe" by Andrea Barrett both touch upon the interconnectedness of food systems and environmental factors. While neither of these works specifically delves into the butter-air quality nexus, they offer insightful perspectives on the broader relationship between human consumption and the environment.
On a more whimsical note, fictional works such as "Chocolat" by Joanne Harris and "Like Water for Chocolate" by Laura Esquivel present narratives intertwining food and sensory experiences, offering a lighthearted departure from the usual academic discourse.
In the realm of internet culture, memes such as the "I Can't Believe It's Not Butter" and "This Is Butter" have gained traction in discussions about dietary choices and their unexpected repercussions. While these memes offer more humor than empirical evidence, they reflect the popular imagination's engagement with food-related environmental impacts.
As we sail through this sea of literature, it becomes abundantly clear that the connection between butter consumption and air quality in York, Pennsylvania is an underexplored, yet potentially rich area of inquiry. With these diverse sources as our guide, we will churn out a truly novel contribution to the study of dietary influences on environmental quality.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon churning through the data collected from the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency, we found some rather "grate" results. The correlation coefficient between butter consumption and air quality in York, Pennsylvania turned out to be 0.8119590, indicating a strong association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. And with an r-squared of 0.6592774, we can confidently say that butter consumption explains a significant proportion of the variation in air quality. It appears that the air in York might indeed be flavored with the essence of butter!
The p-value of less than 0.01 further supports our findings, suggesting that the likelihood of this association occurring by chance is quite low. In other words, this relationship is not just some half-baked coincidence – it’s the real "butter" deal.
Looking at the scatterplot (Fig. 1), the data points are as tightly packed as a perfectly formed ball of butter, illustrating the strong and positive linear relationship between butter consumption and air quality. It’s clear that these two variables are not just margarinely associated; they’re as close as peanut butter and jelly!
In conclusion, our findings suggest that there’s more to butter than meets the eye. This study not only highlights the potential impact of dietary choices on environmental factors but also serves as a reminder to scientists everywhere to churn over every possibility. So, let’s spread the news and butter up the interest in this dairy-silly, yet intriguing area of study. Who knew that butter and air quality could go together like bread and butter? We hope our findings inspire more research into the dairy-silient connection between food consumption and environmental impact.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The results of our study have churned out some truly fascinating insights into the association between butter consumption and air quality in York, Pennsylvania. Let’s spread some "buttery" understanding of how our findings shake up the scientific world!

First, let's address the dairy elephant in the room – the literature review. While some may "diss" the whimsical nods, such as memes and fictional works, we found that these sources shed light on the public's engagement with food-related environmental impacts. As researchers, it's important to recognize the value of diverse perspectives, even those cloaked in the buttery goodness of popular culture. So, let’s acknowledge that we are all just buttering up our collective understanding!

Revisiting the more serious studies, our findings supported prior research well. For instance, Smith et al.'s work on dairy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions provided a creamy foundation for our study. The significant positive correlation they found between dairy products and environmental impact echoes our own association between butter consumption and air quality. It’s as if the literature is trying to tell us, "Don't churn away from the truth – butter consumption does matter!"

Moreover, Doe et al.'s exploration of the impact of dietary choices on air quality, although not specific to butter, hinted at the broader influence of food-related activities on environmental factors. Their study was like the unsung lyric that harmonized perfectly with our buttery melody. It’s truly remarkable how the scientific literature churned out a rich body of evidence to support our findings.

As for the statistical analysis, our corroborating correlation coefficient, r-squared, and p-value further fortified the reliability of our results. The tight scatterplot proved that the association between butter consumption and air quality is as solid as a well-formed pat of butter!

In closing, this study serves as a gentle reminder that, in the world of research, you can never have too much butter. Our findings not only contribute to the "unbuttered" realms of environmental science but also emphasize the importance of taking seemingly unrelated variables with a grain of salt – or butter, in this case. Bon appétit to future researchers as they delve deeper into this dairy-silient connection between food consumption and environmental impact!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Air quality in York, Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Spread it, Don't Shred it: Butter Consumption and Air Quality in York, Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we spread our findings on the connection between butter consumption and air quality in York, Pennsylvania. Our research aims to butter up the knowledge base of how dietary choices may impact environmental factors. Through a spread of data from the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency, we churned out some interesting results. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.8119590 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021, pointing to a strong association between butter consumption and air quality in this particular region. This study aims to whip up interest in the intersection of food choices and environmental impact, and we hope to butter the path for further research in this dairy silly area of study.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
When it comes to the relationship between diet and environmental factors, we often focus on the big players such as greenhouse gas emissions from livestock or the impact of agriculture on land use. However, there’s a whole world of potential connections waiting to be buttered up, if only we dare to spread our research efforts a little wider. One such unexplored link is the association between butter consumption and air quality.
It’s not every day that you come across a study that brings together dairy products and environmental science. However, we believe that it’s time to churn up some excitement about this buttery intriguing relationship. So, grab your spreader and tighten your lab coat, because we’re about to dive into the creamy world of butter and its potential impact on the air we breathe in York, Pennsylvania.
Now, some may scoff at the idea that butter consumption could have any bearing on air quality. After all, it's not like we’re seeing cows taking flight or butter bricks floating through the atmosphere. However, as researchers, it’s our job to dig deep, or should I say churn deep, into the data and see if there’s any substance to this seemingly whimsical hypothesis.
So sit tight and prepare to delve into a world where spreadsheets and spreads collide, where we mix data and dairy to uncover the potential connections between two seemingly unrelated variables. By the time we’re done, you'll be left wondering if the air in York is truly being seasoned with the subtle fragrance of freshly churned butter.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon churning through the data collected from the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency, we found some rather "grate" results. The correlation coefficient between butter consumption and air quality in York, Pennsylvania turned out to be 0.8119590, indicating a strong association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. And with an r-squared of 0.6592774, we can confidently say that butter consumption explains a significant proportion of the variation in air quality. It appears that the air in York might indeed be flavored with the essence of butter!
The p-value of less than 0.01 further supports our findings, suggesting that the likelihood of this association occurring by chance is quite low. In other words, this relationship is not just some half-baked coincidence – it’s the real "butter" deal.
Looking at the scatterplot (Fig. 1), the data points are as tightly packed as a perfectly formed ball of butter, illustrating the strong and positive linear relationship between butter consumption and air quality. It’s clear that these two variables are not just margarinely associated; they’re as close as peanut butter and jelly!
In conclusion, our findings suggest that there’s more to butter than meets the eye. This study not only highlights the potential impact of dietary choices on environmental factors but also serves as a reminder to scientists everywhere to churn over every possibility. So, let’s spread the news and butter up the interest in this dairy-silly, yet intriguing area of study. Who knew that butter and air quality could go together like bread and butter? We hope our findings inspire more research into the dairy-silient connection between food consumption and environmental impact.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the wake of our "utterly" surprising findings, it's clear that the link between butter consumption and air quality in York, Pennsylvania is no mere margarine of error. Our study has shown a robust association between these seemingly "unbuttery" variables, highlighting the need for further exploration into the deliciously quirky world of dairy products and environmental impact. This research, while undoubtedly cheesy at times, has churned up vital insights into the potential ramifications of our dietary choices on the air we breathe.

As tempting as it may be to continue spreading our efforts in this area, we are "butter" to declare that no further research is needed in this particular domain. It's time to let this study stand as a testament to the unexpected correlations that can be uncovered when researchers dare to delve into unconventional pairings. We hope our findings have whipped up a sense of curiosity and "buttered" up some excitement for the quirky and creamy side of scientific inquiry. After all, who knew that the pathways of science could be so deliciously unexpected?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Spread it, Don't Shred it: Butter Consumption and Air Quality in York, Pennsylvania. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Culinary Science and Environmental Health


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Spread it, Don't Shred it: Butter Consumption and Air Quality in York, Pennsylvania. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Dairy Delights and Environmental Exploration


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Spread it, Don't Shred it: Butter Consumption and Air Quality in York, Pennsylvania with an abstract of In this paper, we spread our findings on the connection between butter consumption and air quality in York, Pennsylvania. Our research aims to butter up the knowledge base of how dietary choices may impact environmental factors. Through a spread of data from the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency, we churned out some interesting results. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.8119590 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021, pointing to a strong association between butter consumption and air quality in this particular region. This study aims to whip up interest in the intersection of food choices and environmental impact, and we hope to butter the path for further research in this dairy silly area of study.

ChatGPT:

butter consumption, air quality, York Pennsylvania, dietary choices, environmental impact, USDA data, Environmental Protection Agency data, correlation coefficient, food choices, research, environmental factors

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Butter consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of Butter in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Butter consumption

Air quality in York, Pennsylvania
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with good or moderate air quality in York-Hanover, PA
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in York, Pennsylvania

Correlation r = 0.8119590 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6592774 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 65.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air quality in York, Pennsylvania) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Butter consumption) over the 32 years from 1990 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.7E-8. 0.0000000169618434106188000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.81 in 1.7E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 58,955,856 random variables You don't actually need 58 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 31 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 31 because we have two variables measured over a period of 32 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.65, 0.9 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Butter consumption (Pounds per person)4.34.44.34.74.74.64.34.24.34.64.54.34.44.54.54.54.74.7554.95.45.55.55.55.65.75.766.26.36.5
Air quality in York, Pennsylvania (Good air quality)92.03386.575394.535591.758291.758292.857195.616489.315187.123391.232992.622987.671286.849392.307795.628489.58997.260390.684993.424798.630194.520596.438496.174998.356299.72697.534298.633910099.72610010099.4398




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.3,4.4,4.3,4.7,4.7,4.6,4.3,4.2,4.3,4.6,4.5,4.3,4.4,4.5,4.5,4.5,4.7,4.7,5,5,4.9,5.4,5.5,5.5,5.5,5.6,5.7,5.7,6,6.2,6.3,6.5,])
array_2 = np.array([92.033,86.5753,94.5355,91.7582,91.7582,92.8571,95.6164,89.3151,87.1233,91.2329,92.6229,87.6712,86.8493,92.3077,95.6284,89.589,97.2603,90.6849,93.4247,98.6301,94.5205,96.4384,96.1749,98.3562,99.726,97.5342,98.6339,100,99.726,100,100,99.4398,])
array_1_name = "Butter consumption"
array_2_name = "Air quality in York, Pennsylvania"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 4908 · Black Variable ID: 557 · Red Variable ID: 21488
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0