about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,791 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How clickbait-y LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are and the second variable is The number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The aircraft mechanics in Vermont are secretly working with LEMMiNO to determine the most attention-grabbing video titles, using their knowledge of aerodynamics to ensure the clickbait levels are sky high. As the mechanics tinker with more planes, they inadvertently inspire LEMMiNO to craft even more sensational video titles. It's a whole new level of "flying under the radar" for both parties.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Concept art ] Generate an image portraying a buzzing aircraft hangar in Vermont. Inside, a group of aircraft mechanics are gathered around a table covered in detailed schematics and charts, engaged in deep discussion with the YouTube content creator LEMMiNO. As the mechanics lean in, pointing to different sections of the plans, LEMMiNO can be seen feverishly scribbling notes on potential video titles. The background showcases the sleek silhouettes of planes against the white walls, hinting at the mechanics' expertise in their craft. The image should capture the sense of collaboration as the mechanics and LEMMiNO exchange ideas, revealing their excitement as they uncover the perfect combination of aerodynamics and engaging content. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How clickbait-y LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are and The number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Futuristic Concept art Cutsy art illustration Cutsy art illustration Voxel art
ChatGPT: Concept art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How clickbait-y LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are and The number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont, in the following situation: The aircraft mechanics in Vermont are secretly working with LEMMiNO to determine the most attention-grabbing video titles, using their knowledge of aerodynamics to ensure the clickbait levels are sky high. As the mechanics tinker with more planes, they inadvertently inspire LEMMiNO to craft even more sensational video titles. It's a whole new level of "flying under the radar" for both parties.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling aircraft hangar in Vermont, a group of aircraft mechanics gather around a table covered in schematics and charts, deep in discussion with LEMMiNO. As they lean in, pointing to different sections of the plans, LEMMiNO feverishly scribbles down notes on potential video titles. In the background, the sleek silhouettes of planes stand out against the white walls, hinting at the mechanics' expertise in their craft. The scene is brimming with a sense of collaboration as the mechanics and LEMMiNO exchange ideas, their excitement evident as they uncover the perfect combination of aerodynamics and clickbait.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Concept art ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling aircraft hangar in Vermont, a group of aircraft mechanics gather around a table covered in schematics and charts, deep in discussion with LEMMiNO. As they lean in, pointing to different sections of the plans, LEMMiNO feverishly scribbles down notes on potential video titles. In the background, the sleek silhouettes of planes stand out against the white walls, hinting at the mechanics' expertise in their craft. The scene is brimming with a sense of collaboration as the mechanics and LEMMiNO exchange ideas, their excitement evident as they uncover the perfect combination of aerodynamics and clickbait. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Concept art ] Generate an image portraying a buzzing aircraft hangar in Vermont. Inside, a group of aircraft mechanics are gathered around a table covered in detailed schematics and charts, engaged in deep discussion with the YouTube content creator LEMMiNO. As the mechanics lean in, pointing to different sections of the plans, LEMMiNO can be seen feverishly scribbling notes on potential video titles. The background showcases the sleek silhouettes of planes against the white walls, hinting at the mechanics' expertise in their craft. The image should capture the sense of collaboration as the mechanics and LEMMiNO exchange ideas, revealing their excitement as they uncover the perfect combination of aerodynamics and engaging content.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humerus responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how changes in How clickbait-y LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are caused The number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Clickbait Craze and Aircraft Mechanics: Unraveling the Rhyme and Reason

Journal of Aviation and Internet Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are and The number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8703907 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Clickbait Craze and Aircraft Mechanics: Unraveling the Rhyme and Reason"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between the clickbait-y nature of LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the dynamics of the aircraft mechanics workforce in Vermont. Leveraging data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles alongside the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we navigated through the complexities of this peculiar connection. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8703907 with statistical significance at p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2022. Through wry observations and keen analysis, we illuminate the unexpected relationship between clickbait allure and the vocational choices in the aviation industry. This study not only provides statistical evidence but also adds a touch of whimsy to the intersection of digital engagement strategies and labor trends.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are and The number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Clickbait Craze and Aircraft Mechanics: Unraveling the Rhyme and Reason"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between the clickbait-y nature of LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the dynamics of the aircraft mechanics workforce in Vermont. Leveraging data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles alongside the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we navigated through the complexities of this peculiar connection. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8703907 with statistical significance at p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2022. Through wry observations and keen analysis, we illuminate the unexpected relationship between clickbait allure and the vocational choices in the aviation industry. This study not only provides statistical evidence but also adds a touch of whimsy to the intersection of digital engagement strategies and labor trends.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The field of occupational demographics has long been a fertile ground for exploring the intricate dance of human behavior and labor market dynamics. In recent years, the advent of digital platforms has introduced a new dimension to this intricate tapestry. Specifically, the rise of clickbait culture on platforms such as YouTube has raised eyebrows and curiosity alike. Meanwhile, the aviation industry, with its complexities and precision, has always been a subject of fascination and admiration. It is within this context that we set out to unravel the enigmatic connection between clickbait allure and the number of aircraft mechanics in the idyllic state of Vermont.

As our world becomes increasingly interconnected through digital channels, the influence of online content cannot be underestimated. YouTube, one of the leading platforms for video consumption, has given rise to a phenomenon known as clickbait, wherein tantalizing titles and thumbnails entice viewers to click and view the content. The enigmatic allure of such clickbait-y content has captured the attention of many, including the scholarly community. Amidst this digital landscape, our research aims to shed light on the potential influence that these attention-grabbing video titles may have on vocational choices in specialized fields.

Vermont, known for its picturesque landscapes and picturesque roads, might seem an unlikely setting for our investigation. However, under the tranquil façade, the state houses a contingent of aircraft mechanics, diligently ensuring the safety and functionality of airborne machinery. The juxtaposition of this tranquil setting with the fast-paced, flashy world of clickbait culture sets the stage for an unexpected exploration.

The link between these seemingly disparate elements seeks to answer a compelling question: Could the online allure of clickbait be shaping the vocational inclinations of individuals within the aviation industry? This inquiry, while unconventional, opens a window into the intricate ways in which digital engagement strategies may intersect with the vocational choices and labor trends. Moreover, the findings of this study aim to infuse a touch of whimsy into the realm of statistical analysis, demonstrating the potential for unexpected connections and correlations. Through this unusual lens, our research endeavors to enrich the discourse around occupational dynamics and digital influences with a sprinkle of light-hearted curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are and The number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Clickbait Craze and Aircraft Mechanics: Unraveling the Rhyme and Reason"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between the clickbait-y nature of LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the dynamics of the aircraft mechanics workforce in Vermont. Leveraging data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles alongside the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we navigated through the complexities of this peculiar connection. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8703907 with statistical significance at p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2022. Through wry observations and keen analysis, we illuminate the unexpected relationship between clickbait allure and the vocational choices in the aviation industry. This study not only provides statistical evidence but also adds a touch of whimsy to the intersection of digital engagement strategies and labor trends.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The field of occupational demographics has long been a fertile ground for exploring the intricate dance of human behavior and labor market dynamics. In recent years, the advent of digital platforms has introduced a new dimension to this intricate tapestry. Specifically, the rise of clickbait culture on platforms such as YouTube has raised eyebrows and curiosity alike. Meanwhile, the aviation industry, with its complexities and precision, has always been a subject of fascination and admiration. It is within this context that we set out to unravel the enigmatic connection between clickbait allure and the number of aircraft mechanics in the idyllic state of Vermont.
As our world becomes increasingly interconnected through digital channels, the influence of online content cannot be underestimated. YouTube, one of the leading platforms for video consumption, has given rise to a phenomenon known as clickbait, wherein tantalizing titles and thumbnails entice viewers to click and view the content. The enigmatic allure of such clickbait-y content has captured the attention of many, including the scholarly community. Amidst this digital landscape, our research aims to shed light on the potential influence that these attention-grabbing video titles may have on vocational choices in specialized fields.
Vermont, known for its picturesque landscapes and picturesque roads, might seem an unlikely setting for our investigation. However, under the tranquil façade, the state houses a contingent of aircraft mechanics, diligently ensuring the safety and functionality of airborne machinery. The juxtaposition of this tranquil setting with the fast-paced, flashy world of clickbait culture sets the stage for an unexpected exploration.
The link between these seemingly disparate elements seeks to answer a compelling question: Could the online allure of clickbait be shaping the vocational inclinations of individuals within the aviation industry? This inquiry, while unconventional, opens a window into the intricate ways in which digital engagement strategies may intersect with the vocational choices and labor trends. Moreover, the findings of this study aim to infuse a touch of whimsy into the realm of statistical analysis, demonstrating the potential for unexpected connections and correlations. Through this unusual lens, our research endeavors to enrich the discourse around occupational dynamics and digital influences with a sprinkle of light-hearted curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The exploration of the connection between clickbait allure on LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the workforce of aircraft mechanics in Vermont has attracted the attention of researchers seeking to unravel this curious correlation. One of the seminal studies in this domain, Smith et al. (2015), initially laid the groundwork for examining the impact of digital content engagement on vocational choices. Building on this foundation, Doe (2017) delved into the nuances of online user behavior and its potential influence on occupational pathways. Jones (2019) further expanded the discourse by delving into the psychological underpinnings of clickbait appeal and its implications for vocational interests.

Expanding beyond the traditional boundaries of scholarly research, the orbit of literature encompassing this peculiar phenomenon extends to non-fiction works such as "Freakonomics" and "Blink" by Steven Levitt and Malcolm Gladwell, respectively. These works, while not directly related to the specific confluence of clickbait and aircraft mechanics, offer insights into the subtle dynamics that shape human decision-making processes and are tangentially relevant to the overarching theme of our investigation.

In a similar vein, the realm of fiction literature offers unexpected parallels to our pursuit. "Catch-22" by Joseph Heller and "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams, though seemingly unrelated, embed elements of absurdity and unexpected connections that parallel the whimsical nature of our inquiry. The idiosyncrasies presented in these works mirror the unexpected link between digital content engagement and vocational pursuits, adding a playful layer to our exploration.

Furthermore, the world of animated cartoons and children's shows has not been spared from our scrutiny. Through immersive research involving "Scooby-Doo" and "The Magic School Bus," we unearthed unsuspected correlations between the exaggerated allure of clickbait and the underlying themes of precision and ingenuity present in aviation-related occupations. While unconventional, these sources provided a refreshing lens through which to view the interplay of digital engagement strategies and vocational preferences.

In sum, the literature landscape surrounding the convergence of clickbait-y YouTube video titles and the employment trends in the aircraft mechanics sector presents a rich tapestry of empirical studies, non-fiction works, and unexpected parallels from fiction and children's media. This diverse collection of sources serves to illuminate the interdisciplinary nature of our investigation and infuses a touch of whimsy into the scholarly discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are and The number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Clickbait Craze and Aircraft Mechanics: Unraveling the Rhyme and Reason"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between the clickbait-y nature of LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the dynamics of the aircraft mechanics workforce in Vermont. Leveraging data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles alongside the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we navigated through the complexities of this peculiar connection. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8703907 with statistical significance at p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2022. Through wry observations and keen analysis, we illuminate the unexpected relationship between clickbait allure and the vocational choices in the aviation industry. This study not only provides statistical evidence but also adds a touch of whimsy to the intersection of digital engagement strategies and labor trends.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The field of occupational demographics has long been a fertile ground for exploring the intricate dance of human behavior and labor market dynamics. In recent years, the advent of digital platforms has introduced a new dimension to this intricate tapestry. Specifically, the rise of clickbait culture on platforms such as YouTube has raised eyebrows and curiosity alike. Meanwhile, the aviation industry, with its complexities and precision, has always been a subject of fascination and admiration. It is within this context that we set out to unravel the enigmatic connection between clickbait allure and the number of aircraft mechanics in the idyllic state of Vermont.
As our world becomes increasingly interconnected through digital channels, the influence of online content cannot be underestimated. YouTube, one of the leading platforms for video consumption, has given rise to a phenomenon known as clickbait, wherein tantalizing titles and thumbnails entice viewers to click and view the content. The enigmatic allure of such clickbait-y content has captured the attention of many, including the scholarly community. Amidst this digital landscape, our research aims to shed light on the potential influence that these attention-grabbing video titles may have on vocational choices in specialized fields.
Vermont, known for its picturesque landscapes and picturesque roads, might seem an unlikely setting for our investigation. However, under the tranquil façade, the state houses a contingent of aircraft mechanics, diligently ensuring the safety and functionality of airborne machinery. The juxtaposition of this tranquil setting with the fast-paced, flashy world of clickbait culture sets the stage for an unexpected exploration.
The link between these seemingly disparate elements seeks to answer a compelling question: Could the online allure of clickbait be shaping the vocational inclinations of individuals within the aviation industry? This inquiry, while unconventional, opens a window into the intricate ways in which digital engagement strategies may intersect with the vocational choices and labor trends. Moreover, the findings of this study aim to infuse a touch of whimsy into the realm of statistical analysis, demonstrating the potential for unexpected connections and correlations. Through this unusual lens, our research endeavors to enrich the discourse around occupational dynamics and digital influences with a sprinkle of light-hearted curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The present study employed a multifaceted approach to unravel the correlation between the clickbait-y nature of LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont. Data collection was conducted over the span of ten years, from 2012 to 2022, to capture the evolving digital landscape and labor market trends with ample breadth and depth.

To initiate the research process, AI-based algorithms were meticulously designed and calibrated to analyze the clickbait intensity of LEMMiNO YouTube video titles. This involved parsing the linguistic and psychological elements embedded within the titles, such as hyperbolic language, tantalizing propositions, and enigmatic allure. The algorithms, with their digital discernment, sifted through a plethora of video titles, discerning the nuances of clickbait allure with an unflagging digital eye.

Simultaneously, statistical data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics was procured to meticulously track the number of aircraft mechanics employed in the state of Vermont over the same time period. The precision and thoroughness of the Bureau's data collection methods served as a robust foundation for our analytical endeavors.

The subsequent phase entailed a comprehensive statistical analysis, where the data sets from the AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Bureau of Labor Statistics were meticulously transmuted into coherent numerical expressions. These expressions were subjected to regression analysis, primarily employing the Pearson correlation coefficient and its associated significance tests. The endeavor was to discern any discernible patterns and interplay between the clickbait intensity of YouTube video titles and the quantity of aircraft mechanics in Vermont.

Moreover, our research team sought to instill a touch of whimsy and light-heartedness even within the serious realm of statistical analysis. This involved occasional punning and wry remarks during data analysis and research discussions to infuse a spirit of intellectual playfulness.

Ultimately, the amalgamation of AI-based analysis, labor data scrutiny, and statistical wizardry formed the bedrock of our investigation into the unsuspecting connection betwixt clickbait allure and the valiant endeavors of aircraft mechanics in the pastoral state of Vermont.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are and The number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8703907, r-squared of 0.7575800, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Clickbait Craze and Aircraft Mechanics: Unraveling the Rhyme and Reason"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between the clickbait-y nature of LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the dynamics of the aircraft mechanics workforce in Vermont. Leveraging data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles alongside the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we navigated through the complexities of this peculiar connection. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8703907 with statistical significance at p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2022. Through wry observations and keen analysis, we illuminate the unexpected relationship between clickbait allure and the vocational choices in the aviation industry. This study not only provides statistical evidence but also adds a touch of whimsy to the intersection of digital engagement strategies and labor trends.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The field of occupational demographics has long been a fertile ground for exploring the intricate dance of human behavior and labor market dynamics. In recent years, the advent of digital platforms has introduced a new dimension to this intricate tapestry. Specifically, the rise of clickbait culture on platforms such as YouTube has raised eyebrows and curiosity alike. Meanwhile, the aviation industry, with its complexities and precision, has always been a subject of fascination and admiration. It is within this context that we set out to unravel the enigmatic connection between clickbait allure and the number of aircraft mechanics in the idyllic state of Vermont.
As our world becomes increasingly interconnected through digital channels, the influence of online content cannot be underestimated. YouTube, one of the leading platforms for video consumption, has given rise to a phenomenon known as clickbait, wherein tantalizing titles and thumbnails entice viewers to click and view the content. The enigmatic allure of such clickbait-y content has captured the attention of many, including the scholarly community. Amidst this digital landscape, our research aims to shed light on the potential influence that these attention-grabbing video titles may have on vocational choices in specialized fields.
Vermont, known for its picturesque landscapes and picturesque roads, might seem an unlikely setting for our investigation. However, under the tranquil façade, the state houses a contingent of aircraft mechanics, diligently ensuring the safety and functionality of airborne machinery. The juxtaposition of this tranquil setting with the fast-paced, flashy world of clickbait culture sets the stage for an unexpected exploration.
The link between these seemingly disparate elements seeks to answer a compelling question: Could the online allure of clickbait be shaping the vocational inclinations of individuals within the aviation industry? This inquiry, while unconventional, opens a window into the intricate ways in which digital engagement strategies may intersect with the vocational choices and labor trends. Moreover, the findings of this study aim to infuse a touch of whimsy into the realm of statistical analysis, demonstrating the potential for unexpected connections and correlations. Through this unusual lens, our research endeavors to enrich the discourse around occupational dynamics and digital influences with a sprinkle of light-hearted curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a robust and significant correlation between the clickbait-y nature of LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont. Over the period from 2012 to 2022, a correlation coefficient of 0.8703907 was observed, with an r-squared value of 0.7575800 and the statistical significance of p < 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.

Examination of the scatterplot (Fig. 1) illustrates the remarkable correlation between the clickbait-y nature of LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont. Each data point conveys the intriguing dance between the digital allure of clickbait and the vocational inclinations within the aviation industry. The figure captures the essence of this unexpected relationship, blending statistical rigor with a touch of whimsy.

The findings of this study unveil a compelling association, shedding light on the subtle influences of digital engagement strategies on labor market dynamics. The robustness of the correlation underscores the need for further exploration and understanding of the intersection between online content strategies and vocational preferences. These results not only add a layer of intrigue to the realms of statistical analysis and occupational trends but also incite a moment of pondering the whimsical ways in which human behavior intersects with digital fascination.

The unexpected correlation between clickbait allure and the aircraft mechanics workforce in Vermont serves as a testament to the multifaceted nature of human decisions and the potential influences that permeate through the digital realms. This study not only highlights the statistical evidence of the connection but also injects a note of curiosity and amusement into the serious realms of occupational demographics and digital engagement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are and The number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Clickbait Craze and Aircraft Mechanics: Unraveling the Rhyme and Reason"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between the clickbait-y nature of LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the dynamics of the aircraft mechanics workforce in Vermont. Leveraging data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles alongside the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we navigated through the complexities of this peculiar connection. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8703907 with statistical significance at p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2022. Through wry observations and keen analysis, we illuminate the unexpected relationship between clickbait allure and the vocational choices in the aviation industry. This study not only provides statistical evidence but also adds a touch of whimsy to the intersection of digital engagement strategies and labor trends.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of the connection between clickbait allure on LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the workforce of aircraft mechanics in Vermont has attracted the attention of researchers seeking to unravel this curious correlation. One of the seminal studies in this domain, Smith et al. (2015), initially laid the groundwork for examining the impact of digital content engagement on vocational choices. Building on this foundation, Doe (2017) delved into the nuances of online user behavior and its potential influence on occupational pathways. Jones (2019) further expanded the discourse by delving into the psychological underpinnings of clickbait appeal and its implications for vocational interests.
Expanding beyond the traditional boundaries of scholarly research, the orbit of literature encompassing this peculiar phenomenon extends to non-fiction works such as "Freakonomics" and "Blink" by Steven Levitt and Malcolm Gladwell, respectively. These works, while not directly related to the specific confluence of clickbait and aircraft mechanics, offer insights into the subtle dynamics that shape human decision-making processes and are tangentially relevant to the overarching theme of our investigation.
In a similar vein, the realm of fiction literature offers unexpected parallels to our pursuit. "Catch-22" by Joseph Heller and "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams, though seemingly unrelated, embed elements of absurdity and unexpected connections that parallel the whimsical nature of our inquiry. The idiosyncrasies presented in these works mirror the unexpected link between digital content engagement and vocational pursuits, adding a playful layer to our exploration.
Furthermore, the world of animated cartoons and children's shows has not been spared from our scrutiny. Through immersive research involving "Scooby-Doo" and "The Magic School Bus," we unearthed unsuspected correlations between the exaggerated allure of clickbait and the underlying themes of precision and ingenuity present in aviation-related occupations. While unconventional, these sources provided a refreshing lens through which to view the interplay of digital engagement strategies and vocational preferences.
In sum, the literature landscape surrounding the convergence of clickbait-y YouTube video titles and the employment trends in the aircraft mechanics sector presents a rich tapestry of empirical studies, non-fiction works, and unexpected parallels from fiction and children's media. This diverse collection of sources serves to illuminate the interdisciplinary nature of our investigation and infuses a touch of whimsy into the scholarly discourse.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a robust and significant correlation between the clickbait-y nature of LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont. Over the period from 2012 to 2022, a correlation coefficient of 0.8703907 was observed, with an r-squared value of 0.7575800 and the statistical significance of p < 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.
Examination of the scatterplot (Fig. 1) illustrates the remarkable correlation between the clickbait-y nature of LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont. Each data point conveys the intriguing dance between the digital allure of clickbait and the vocational inclinations within the aviation industry. The figure captures the essence of this unexpected relationship, blending statistical rigor with a touch of whimsy.
The findings of this study unveil a compelling association, shedding light on the subtle influences of digital engagement strategies on labor market dynamics. The robustness of the correlation underscores the need for further exploration and understanding of the intersection between online content strategies and vocational preferences. These results not only add a layer of intrigue to the realms of statistical analysis and occupational trends but also incite a moment of pondering the whimsical ways in which human behavior intersects with digital fascination.
The unexpected correlation between clickbait allure and the aircraft mechanics workforce in Vermont serves as a testament to the multifaceted nature of human decisions and the potential influences that permeate through the digital realms. This study not only highlights the statistical evidence of the connection but also injects a note of curiosity and amusement into the serious realms of occupational demographics and digital engagement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The results of our investigation illuminate a hitherto unexplored and somewhat whimsical correlation between the clickbait-y nature of LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont. Our findings, which are consistent with prior research, provide empirical evidence supporting the notion that digital content engagement exerts an unexpected influence on vocational preferences. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8703907, accompanied by the substantial r-squared value of 0.7575800 and a p-value of less than 0.01, underscores the strength of the relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This may seem surprising at first glance, but when considering the interplay of human decision-making processes and the persuasive allure of clickbait, it becomes apparent that the influence can permeate unexpected domains, such as career choices.

Drawing from the literature landscape, our findings not only corroborate but also extend the insights presented by previous scholarly works. For instance, Doe (2017) delved into the nuances of online user behavior and its potential influence on occupational pathways. Our results align with Doe's findings, demonstrating the tangible impact of digital engagement strategies on vocational interests. Similarly, Jones (2019) expanded the discourse by uncovering the psychological underpinnings of clickbait appeal and its implications for vocational choices. Our study provides empirical support to these psychological mechanisms, substantiating the influence of clickbait allure on the preferences within the aircraft mechanics workforce.

On a lighter note, our research draws intriguing parallels with non-fiction and fiction literature, reflecting the playful layer of our inquiry. The unexpected connections between "Catch-22" by Joseph Heller and the whimsical correlation discovered in our study highlight the serendipitous nature of coincidences and unexpected relationships. Similarly, the idiosyncrasies embedded in animated cartoons and children's shows mirror the unexpected link between digital content engagement and vocational inclinations, showcasing the whimsical undercurrent of our exploration. Although seemingly tangential, these parallels underscore the interdisciplinary nature of our investigation and add a touch of whimsy to the scholarly discourse.

In conclusion, our study contributes a unique perspective to the intersection of digital engagement strategies and vocational preferences. The unexpected correlation between clickbait allure and the aircraft mechanics workforce in Vermont underscores the complexity of human decision-making processes and invites further exploration into the whimsical ways in which online content can influence labor market dynamics. This investigation not only provides statistical evidence but also infuses a moment of curiosity and amusement into the serious realms of occupational demographics and digital engagement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are and The number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Clickbait Craze and Aircraft Mechanics: Unraveling the Rhyme and Reason"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between the clickbait-y nature of LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the dynamics of the aircraft mechanics workforce in Vermont. Leveraging data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles alongside the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we navigated through the complexities of this peculiar connection. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8703907 with statistical significance at p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2022. Through wry observations and keen analysis, we illuminate the unexpected relationship between clickbait allure and the vocational choices in the aviation industry. This study not only provides statistical evidence but also adds a touch of whimsy to the intersection of digital engagement strategies and labor trends.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The field of occupational demographics has long been a fertile ground for exploring the intricate dance of human behavior and labor market dynamics. In recent years, the advent of digital platforms has introduced a new dimension to this intricate tapestry. Specifically, the rise of clickbait culture on platforms such as YouTube has raised eyebrows and curiosity alike. Meanwhile, the aviation industry, with its complexities and precision, has always been a subject of fascination and admiration. It is within this context that we set out to unravel the enigmatic connection between clickbait allure and the number of aircraft mechanics in the idyllic state of Vermont.
As our world becomes increasingly interconnected through digital channels, the influence of online content cannot be underestimated. YouTube, one of the leading platforms for video consumption, has given rise to a phenomenon known as clickbait, wherein tantalizing titles and thumbnails entice viewers to click and view the content. The enigmatic allure of such clickbait-y content has captured the attention of many, including the scholarly community. Amidst this digital landscape, our research aims to shed light on the potential influence that these attention-grabbing video titles may have on vocational choices in specialized fields.
Vermont, known for its picturesque landscapes and picturesque roads, might seem an unlikely setting for our investigation. However, under the tranquil façade, the state houses a contingent of aircraft mechanics, diligently ensuring the safety and functionality of airborne machinery. The juxtaposition of this tranquil setting with the fast-paced, flashy world of clickbait culture sets the stage for an unexpected exploration.
The link between these seemingly disparate elements seeks to answer a compelling question: Could the online allure of clickbait be shaping the vocational inclinations of individuals within the aviation industry? This inquiry, while unconventional, opens a window into the intricate ways in which digital engagement strategies may intersect with the vocational choices and labor trends. Moreover, the findings of this study aim to infuse a touch of whimsy into the realm of statistical analysis, demonstrating the potential for unexpected connections and correlations. Through this unusual lens, our research endeavors to enrich the discourse around occupational dynamics and digital influences with a sprinkle of light-hearted curiosity.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a robust and significant correlation between the clickbait-y nature of LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont. Over the period from 2012 to 2022, a correlation coefficient of 0.8703907 was observed, with an r-squared value of 0.7575800 and the statistical significance of p < 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.
Examination of the scatterplot (Fig. 1) illustrates the remarkable correlation between the clickbait-y nature of LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont. Each data point conveys the intriguing dance between the digital allure of clickbait and the vocational inclinations within the aviation industry. The figure captures the essence of this unexpected relationship, blending statistical rigor with a touch of whimsy.
The findings of this study unveil a compelling association, shedding light on the subtle influences of digital engagement strategies on labor market dynamics. The robustness of the correlation underscores the need for further exploration and understanding of the intersection between online content strategies and vocational preferences. These results not only add a layer of intrigue to the realms of statistical analysis and occupational trends but also incite a moment of pondering the whimsical ways in which human behavior intersects with digital fascination.
The unexpected correlation between clickbait allure and the aircraft mechanics workforce in Vermont serves as a testament to the multifaceted nature of human decisions and the potential influences that permeate through the digital realms. This study not only highlights the statistical evidence of the connection but also injects a note of curiosity and amusement into the serious realms of occupational demographics and digital engagement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the results of this study unveil a surprisingly robust correlation between the clickbait-y nature of LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont. While the initial premise may seem whimsical, the statistical significance at p < 0.01 denotes a compelling relationship. The findings provide an unexpected twist to the conventional narrative of vocational influences, teasing the intersection of digital allure and occupational inclinations. These results beckon us to ponder the tantalizing question of whether the seductive mystery of clickbait titles may indeed sway individuals toward the world of aircraft maintenance. Perhaps the call of "10 Secrets About Air Travel" exerts a more profound influence than we could have imagined!

Examination of the scatterplot further emphasizes the dance between the digital allure of clickbait and the vocational choices within the aviation industry. The plot invites us to appreciate the enchanting tango of statistical significance and whimsical intrigue, where every data point spins a tale of unexpected correlation.

While some may raise an eyebrow at the unconventional nature of this investigation, the statistical evidence stands as a testament to the inexhaustible quirkiness of human decision-making. However, we must caution against overindulging in clickbait, as the allure may lead to a spiraling descent into a vortex of cat videos and conspiracy theories.

In light of these findings, we assert with confidence that no further research is needed in this area. The correlation has been uncovered, the data has spoken, and it's time to bid adieu to this peculiar intersection of clickbait and aircraft mechanics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Clickbait Craze and Aircraft Mechanics: Unraveling the Rhyme and Reason. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Aviation and Internet Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Clickbait Craze and Aircraft Mechanics: Unraveling the Rhyme and Reason. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Association for the Advancement of Unconventional Aeronautical Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Clickbait Craze and Aircraft Mechanics: Unraveling the Rhyme and Reason with an abstract of This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between the clickbait-y nature of LEMMiNO YouTube video titles and the dynamics of the aircraft mechanics workforce in Vermont. Leveraging data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles alongside the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we navigated through the complexities of this peculiar connection. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8703907 with statistical significance at p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2022. Through wry observations and keen analysis, we illuminate the unexpected relationship between clickbait allure and the vocational choices in the aviation industry. This study not only provides statistical evidence but also adds a touch of whimsy to the intersection of digital engagement strategies and labor trends.

ChatGPT:

Clickbait, LEMMiNO, YouTube video titles, aircraft mechanics, aviation industry, workforce dynamics, Vermont, AI analysis, statistical significance, Bureau of Labor Statistics, vocational choices, digital engagement strategies, labor trends, correlation coefficient, AI analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How clickbait-y LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How clickbait-y LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How clickbait-y LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are

The number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of aircraft mechanics and service technicians in Vermont
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont

Correlation r = 0.8703907 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7575800 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 75.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How clickbait-y LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00049. 0.0004916671342561106000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 0.049% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,034 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.57, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
How clickbait-y LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are (Clickbait-y score)3.84.6111555.25.11114.64.33335.55.253
The number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont (Laborers)15018019015021018015015019018090




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3.8,4.6111,5,5,5.2,5.1111,4.6,4.3333,5.5,5.25,3,])
array_2 = np.array([150,180,190,150,210,180,150,150,190,180,90,])
array_1_name = "How clickbait-y LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "The number of aircraft mechanics in Vermont"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 4791 · Black Variable ID: 25594 · Red Variable ID: 15317
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0