about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,753 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Annual US household spending on major appliances and the second variable is Total length of Deep Look YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2014 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As households invested in fancier fridges and cooler cooktops, Deep Look had to extend their videos to ensure they were 'washing' all the information and not just giving viewers a 'dryer' understanding of the topics. After all, they couldn't just 'microwave' the content and risk leaving everyone feeling 'defrosted' and unsatisfied. This led to a 'spin cycle' of longer videos, because when it comes to explaining science, they don't believe in taking shortcuts - they prefer to 'refrigerate' the information until it's 'fully thawed' for the audience.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Create an image that portrays a moment in a modern kitchen where a sleek, high-tech refrigerator is filled with a delightful array of vivid fruits and vegetables. A state-of-the-art cooktop shines under warm overhead lighting. In the scene, a nearby screen displays a Deep Look YouTube video with a lengthy duration indicator, featuring captivating visuals and detailed explanations on a scientific topic. The overall vibe should evoke a sense of modernity and intellectual curiosity. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Annual US household spending on major appliances and Total length of Deep Look YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: 3D Pixar Style a funny image you would see on reddit 3D Pixar Style Cutsy art illustration Magic realism
ChatGPT: a funny image you would see on reddit

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Annual US household spending on major appliances and Total length of Deep Look YouTube videos, in the following situation: As households invested in fancier fridges and cooler cooktops, Deep Look had to extend their videos to ensure they were 'washing' all the information and not just giving viewers a 'dryer' understanding of the topics. After all, they couldn't just 'microwave' the content and risk leaving everyone feeling 'defrosted' and unsatisfied. This led to a 'spin cycle' of longer videos, because when it comes to explaining science, they don't believe in taking shortcuts - they prefer to 'refrigerate' the information until it's 'fully thawed' for the audience.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a modern kitchen, a sleek and fancy refrigerator and a state-of-the-art cooktop take center stage. The refrigerator is filled with colorful fruits and vegetables, and the cooktop is shining under the warm glow of overhead lights. At the same time, on a nearby screen, a Deep Look YouTube video is playing, and the video length indicator shows a significantly longer duration. The video thumbnail suggests an in-depth exploration of a scientific topic, with captivating visuals and detailed explanations.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] and depicting this scene: In a modern kitchen, a sleek and fancy refrigerator and a state-of-the-art cooktop take center stage. The refrigerator is filled with colorful fruits and vegetables, and the cooktop is shining under the warm glow of overhead lights. At the same time, on a nearby screen, a Deep Look YouTube video is playing, and the video length indicator shows a significantly longer duration. The video thumbnail suggests an in-depth exploration of a scientific topic, with captivating visuals and detailed explanations. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Create an image that portrays a moment in a modern kitchen where a sleek, high-tech refrigerator is filled with a delightful array of vivid fruits and vegetables. A state-of-the-art cooktop shines under warm overhead lighting. In the scene, a nearby screen displays a Deep Look YouTube video with a lengthy duration indicator, featuring captivating visuals and detailed explanations on a scientific topic. The overall vibe should evoke a sense of modernity and intellectual curiosity.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Annual US household spending on major appliances caused Total length of Deep Look YouTube videos to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Great Appliance Adventure: Exploring the Link Between Household Spending and Deep Look Length

Journal of Domestic Economics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on major appliances and Total length of Deep Look YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9818927 and p < 0.01 for 2014 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Great Appliance Adventure: Exploring the Link Between Household Spending and Deep Look Length"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to tackle the burning question that has been on everyone's minds: is there a connection between how much we spend on household appliances and the total length of those captivating Deep Look YouTube videos? To answer this pressing query, our research team delved into data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, embarking on a wacky adventure through the world of consumer spending and online content. Unveiling a correlation coefficient of 0.9818927 and p < 0.01 for the years 2014 to 2022, our findings suggest a remarkably strong relationship between annual US household spending on major appliances and the total length of Deep Look videos. This paper demonstrates how by thinking outside the box (or rather, outside the refrigerator), we can uncover peculiar and unexpected connections that defy conventional wisdom. So, grab your popcorn and get ready to dive into the parallel universe of consumer habits and online entertainment!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on major appliances and Total length of Deep Look YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Great Appliance Adventure: Exploring the Link Between Household Spending and Deep Look Length"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to tackle the burning question that has been on everyone's minds: is there a connection between how much we spend on household appliances and the total length of those captivating Deep Look YouTube videos? To answer this pressing query, our research team delved into data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, embarking on a wacky adventure through the world of consumer spending and online content. Unveiling a correlation coefficient of 0.9818927 and p < 0.01 for the years 2014 to 2022, our findings suggest a remarkably strong relationship between annual US household spending on major appliances and the total length of Deep Look videos. This paper demonstrates how by thinking outside the box (or rather, outside the refrigerator), we can uncover peculiar and unexpected connections that defy conventional wisdom. So, grab your popcorn and get ready to dive into the parallel universe of consumer habits and online entertainment!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In our modern age of convenience and entertainment, the allure of purchasing new household appliances is matched only by the appeal of a binge-worthy YouTube channel. While some may argue that these two seemingly unrelated aspects of contemporary life exist in separate spheres, our research sought to uncover the tantalizing connection between them. We embarked on a journey stranger than fiction, traversing the landscape of consumer spending data and online video content in a quest to unravel the mysterious link between our fascination with kitchen gadgets and the mesmerizing world of Deep Look YouTube videos.

As we delved into the ocean of data provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we couldn't help but marvel at the quirky patterns and unexpected correlations that emerged. It was like stumbling upon the hidden treasure chest of statistical anomalies, where the mundane met the mesmerizing, and the ordinary unexpectedly intertwined with the extraordinary. It was a ride more thrilling than a rollercoaster made entirely of washing machines - and trust us, such a wonder of engineering should definitely exist!

With bated breath, we can now reveal our findings, which left us as startled as a toaster with an inexplicable knack for reciting Shakespeare. Our analysis, spanning the years 2014 to 2022, unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9818927 and p < 0.01, suggesting a strikingly robust relationship between annual US household spending on major appliances and the total length of Deep Look videos. Yes, the connection was as clear as the crystal-clean glass of a brand-new dishwasher - and we were just as puzzled as a malfunctioning microwave at midnight!

Throughout this paper, we will showcase how our unorthodox approach led us to uncover this peculiar bond between consumer habits and online entertainment. So, fasten your seatbelts and adjust your screen brightness, for we are about to traverse the wacky landscape where refrigerators and video length collide in an unexpected symphony of correlation!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on major appliances and Total length of Deep Look YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Great Appliance Adventure: Exploring the Link Between Household Spending and Deep Look Length"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to tackle the burning question that has been on everyone's minds: is there a connection between how much we spend on household appliances and the total length of those captivating Deep Look YouTube videos? To answer this pressing query, our research team delved into data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, embarking on a wacky adventure through the world of consumer spending and online content. Unveiling a correlation coefficient of 0.9818927 and p < 0.01 for the years 2014 to 2022, our findings suggest a remarkably strong relationship between annual US household spending on major appliances and the total length of Deep Look videos. This paper demonstrates how by thinking outside the box (or rather, outside the refrigerator), we can uncover peculiar and unexpected connections that defy conventional wisdom. So, grab your popcorn and get ready to dive into the parallel universe of consumer habits and online entertainment!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In our modern age of convenience and entertainment, the allure of purchasing new household appliances is matched only by the appeal of a binge-worthy YouTube channel. While some may argue that these two seemingly unrelated aspects of contemporary life exist in separate spheres, our research sought to uncover the tantalizing connection between them. We embarked on a journey stranger than fiction, traversing the landscape of consumer spending data and online video content in a quest to unravel the mysterious link between our fascination with kitchen gadgets and the mesmerizing world of Deep Look YouTube videos.
As we delved into the ocean of data provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we couldn't help but marvel at the quirky patterns and unexpected correlations that emerged. It was like stumbling upon the hidden treasure chest of statistical anomalies, where the mundane met the mesmerizing, and the ordinary unexpectedly intertwined with the extraordinary. It was a ride more thrilling than a rollercoaster made entirely of washing machines - and trust us, such a wonder of engineering should definitely exist!
With bated breath, we can now reveal our findings, which left us as startled as a toaster with an inexplicable knack for reciting Shakespeare. Our analysis, spanning the years 2014 to 2022, unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9818927 and p < 0.01, suggesting a strikingly robust relationship between annual US household spending on major appliances and the total length of Deep Look videos. Yes, the connection was as clear as the crystal-clean glass of a brand-new dishwasher - and we were just as puzzled as a malfunctioning microwave at midnight!
Throughout this paper, we will showcase how our unorthodox approach led us to uncover this peculiar bond between consumer habits and online entertainment. So, fasten your seatbelts and adjust your screen brightness, for we are about to traverse the wacky landscape where refrigerators and video length collide in an unexpected symphony of correlation!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find a strong positive correlation between annual US household spending on major appliances and the total length of Deep Look YouTube videos. As we wade into the depths of this peculiar correlation, it becomes clear that this topic has attracted substantial scholarly attention. Much like a tumble in the dryer, our journey begins with a series of serious studies that lay the foundation for our investigation.

Doe and Jones, in their seminal work, "Consumer Spending Habits in Modern Society," shed light on the intricate web of consumer behavior, exploring how individuals allocate their hard-earned dollars across various categories, including household appliances. The literature provides a comprehensive overview of the dynamics at play, underlining the significance of household spending patterns as indicators of changing consumer preferences. Yet, as we immerse ourselves deeper into this ocean of research, we can't help but marvel at the delightful absurdity that unfolds - it's like discovering a hidden compartment in a refrigerator that leads to a magical universe of statistical oddities.

Turning to real non-fiction books that could tangentially relate to our topic, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offers a captivating examination of unexpected correlations and puzzling phenomena in everyday life. While "Predictably Irrational" by Dan Ariely delves into the quirky and irrational decisions that govern consumer behavior, hinting at the whimsical nature of our spending habits. These works provide a fitting backdrop for our exploration, akin to placing a pair of mismatched socks in the same laundry load - unexpectedly harmonious yet amusingly mismatched.

As we dare to take another leap into the realm of fiction, the titles "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams and "Good Omens" by Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett spring to mind. Both offer whimsical narratives that embrace the absurd and the unexpected, echoing the spirit of our unconventional investigation into the linkage between appliance purchases and online video durations.

In a parallel universe where the connections are as surreal as a talking teapot in an episode of "The Twilight Zone," we explored movies with subtle ties to our research. "The Secret Life of Walter Mitty" and "Back to the Future" may seem like distant cousins to our investigation, but their underlying themes of exploration, discovery, and unexpected connections reflect the essence of our scholarly escapade through the realm of household spending and Deep Look video lengths.

With a jolt of humor and a dash of whimsy, we now plunge into the heart of our analysis, where numbers and YouTube videos collide in a spectacle that will leave readers both astounded and chuckling.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on major appliances and Total length of Deep Look YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube . You used data from 2014 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Great Appliance Adventure: Exploring the Link Between Household Spending and Deep Look Length"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to tackle the burning question that has been on everyone's minds: is there a connection between how much we spend on household appliances and the total length of those captivating Deep Look YouTube videos? To answer this pressing query, our research team delved into data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, embarking on a wacky adventure through the world of consumer spending and online content. Unveiling a correlation coefficient of 0.9818927 and p < 0.01 for the years 2014 to 2022, our findings suggest a remarkably strong relationship between annual US household spending on major appliances and the total length of Deep Look videos. This paper demonstrates how by thinking outside the box (or rather, outside the refrigerator), we can uncover peculiar and unexpected connections that defy conventional wisdom. So, grab your popcorn and get ready to dive into the parallel universe of consumer habits and online entertainment!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In our modern age of convenience and entertainment, the allure of purchasing new household appliances is matched only by the appeal of a binge-worthy YouTube channel. While some may argue that these two seemingly unrelated aspects of contemporary life exist in separate spheres, our research sought to uncover the tantalizing connection between them. We embarked on a journey stranger than fiction, traversing the landscape of consumer spending data and online video content in a quest to unravel the mysterious link between our fascination with kitchen gadgets and the mesmerizing world of Deep Look YouTube videos.
As we delved into the ocean of data provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we couldn't help but marvel at the quirky patterns and unexpected correlations that emerged. It was like stumbling upon the hidden treasure chest of statistical anomalies, where the mundane met the mesmerizing, and the ordinary unexpectedly intertwined with the extraordinary. It was a ride more thrilling than a rollercoaster made entirely of washing machines - and trust us, such a wonder of engineering should definitely exist!
With bated breath, we can now reveal our findings, which left us as startled as a toaster with an inexplicable knack for reciting Shakespeare. Our analysis, spanning the years 2014 to 2022, unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9818927 and p < 0.01, suggesting a strikingly robust relationship between annual US household spending on major appliances and the total length of Deep Look videos. Yes, the connection was as clear as the crystal-clean glass of a brand-new dishwasher - and we were just as puzzled as a malfunctioning microwave at midnight!
Throughout this paper, we will showcase how our unorthodox approach led us to uncover this peculiar bond between consumer habits and online entertainment. So, fasten your seatbelts and adjust your screen brightness, for we are about to traverse the wacky landscape where refrigerators and video length collide in an unexpected symphony of correlation!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on this zany research adventure, our team harnessed the power of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube. Armed with spreadsheets, statistical software, and an inexhaustible supply of caffeinated beverages, we set out to unravel the tantalizing relationship between annual US household spending on major appliances and the total length of those mesmerizing Deep Look YouTube videos.

First, we meticulously scoured the Bureau of Labor Statistics' treasure trove of consumer expenditure data. Armed with a trusty magnifying glass and a keen eye for quirks, we combed through the details of household spending on appliances, navigating through the labyrinth of statistics like treasure hunters in search of statistical gold.

To ensure the most comprehensive and up-to-date analysis, we cast a wide net over the years 2014 to 2022, capturing the ebb and flow of consumer spending trends like intrepid sailors navigating the tumultuous seas of economic data.

As for the YouTube side of our escapade, we confronted the daunting task of wrangling video length data from the wily depths of the internet. We navigated through the sea of cat videos and DIY tutorials, armed with nothing but a compass of determination and a map of reliable sources. Ultimately, we were able to compile a hearty dataset of Deep Look video lengths, all the while dodging the siren calls of clickbait and the treacherous whirlpools of misleading metrics.

With our dual datasets in hand, we summoned the power of statistical analysis like wizards conjuring spells. Through the incantations of correlation coefficients and hypothesis tests, we scrutinized the patterns and relationships between household spending on appliances and the length of Deep Look videos, channeling the spirit of unconventional connections and delightful surprises.

While our methods may have been as quirky as a dancing fridge, and our journey as unpredictable as a runaway Roomba, our approach allowed us to uncover a riveting correlation that transcended traditional expectations. So, let's buckle up for the next thrilling chapter of this wild research ride!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on major appliances and Total length of Deep Look YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube .

For the time period 2014 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9818927, r-squared of 0.9641132, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Great Appliance Adventure: Exploring the Link Between Household Spending and Deep Look Length"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to tackle the burning question that has been on everyone's minds: is there a connection between how much we spend on household appliances and the total length of those captivating Deep Look YouTube videos? To answer this pressing query, our research team delved into data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, embarking on a wacky adventure through the world of consumer spending and online content. Unveiling a correlation coefficient of 0.9818927 and p < 0.01 for the years 2014 to 2022, our findings suggest a remarkably strong relationship between annual US household spending on major appliances and the total length of Deep Look videos. This paper demonstrates how by thinking outside the box (or rather, outside the refrigerator), we can uncover peculiar and unexpected connections that defy conventional wisdom. So, grab your popcorn and get ready to dive into the parallel universe of consumer habits and online entertainment!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In our modern age of convenience and entertainment, the allure of purchasing new household appliances is matched only by the appeal of a binge-worthy YouTube channel. While some may argue that these two seemingly unrelated aspects of contemporary life exist in separate spheres, our research sought to uncover the tantalizing connection between them. We embarked on a journey stranger than fiction, traversing the landscape of consumer spending data and online video content in a quest to unravel the mysterious link between our fascination with kitchen gadgets and the mesmerizing world of Deep Look YouTube videos.
As we delved into the ocean of data provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we couldn't help but marvel at the quirky patterns and unexpected correlations that emerged. It was like stumbling upon the hidden treasure chest of statistical anomalies, where the mundane met the mesmerizing, and the ordinary unexpectedly intertwined with the extraordinary. It was a ride more thrilling than a rollercoaster made entirely of washing machines - and trust us, such a wonder of engineering should definitely exist!
With bated breath, we can now reveal our findings, which left us as startled as a toaster with an inexplicable knack for reciting Shakespeare. Our analysis, spanning the years 2014 to 2022, unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9818927 and p < 0.01, suggesting a strikingly robust relationship between annual US household spending on major appliances and the total length of Deep Look videos. Yes, the connection was as clear as the crystal-clean glass of a brand-new dishwasher - and we were just as puzzled as a malfunctioning microwave at midnight!
Throughout this paper, we will showcase how our unorthodox approach led us to uncover this peculiar bond between consumer habits and online entertainment. So, fasten your seatbelts and adjust your screen brightness, for we are about to traverse the wacky landscape where refrigerators and video length collide in an unexpected symphony of correlation!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the relationship between annual US household spending on major appliances and the total length of Deep Look YouTube videos has uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9818927, with an r-squared of 0.9641132 and p < 0.01 for the time period 2014 to 2022. In other words, our data revealed a connection so strong that it's like finding a perfectly preserved vintage fridge in your grandma's garage – unexpected yet undeniable.

As shown in Fig. 1 (which is so visually stunning, it could almost rival the captivating cinematography of a Deep Look video), the scatterplot illustrates the robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the appliances and the videos secretly conspired to form this bond, whispering inside jokes that only the statistical analysis could unravel.

The strength of this correlation is as surprising as finding a toaster oven that can also brew coffee – it challenges our conventional understanding of consumer behavior and online content consumption. Our findings suggest that as annual household spending on major appliances increases, the total length of Deep Look YouTube videos also surges, creating a parallel trajectory that defies ordinary logic. It's like witnessing a choreographed dance between the hum of a refrigerator and the graceful narration of a Deep Look video, a spectacle both peculiar and mesmerizing.

In essence, our research has waltzed into uncharted territories, revealing connections that are as unexpected as finding a washing machine with a built-in karaoke function. This unorthodox exploration of consumer habits and online entertainment has not only re-defined the boundaries of correlation but has also demonstrated the fascinating interplay between seemingly unrelated facets of modern life. So, grab your favorite snack, settle into your comfiest armchair, and get ready to be amused, surprised, and perhaps even a little baffled by the charming synchronicity of household spending and YouTube video lengths.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on major appliances and Total length of Deep Look YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Great Appliance Adventure: Exploring the Link Between Household Spending and Deep Look Length"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to tackle the burning question that has been on everyone's minds: is there a connection between how much we spend on household appliances and the total length of those captivating Deep Look YouTube videos? To answer this pressing query, our research team delved into data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, embarking on a wacky adventure through the world of consumer spending and online content. Unveiling a correlation coefficient of 0.9818927 and p < 0.01 for the years 2014 to 2022, our findings suggest a remarkably strong relationship between annual US household spending on major appliances and the total length of Deep Look videos. This paper demonstrates how by thinking outside the box (or rather, outside the refrigerator), we can uncover peculiar and unexpected connections that defy conventional wisdom. So, grab your popcorn and get ready to dive into the parallel universe of consumer habits and online entertainment!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find a strong positive correlation between annual US household spending on major appliances and the total length of Deep Look YouTube videos. As we wade into the depths of this peculiar correlation, it becomes clear that this topic has attracted substantial scholarly attention. Much like a tumble in the dryer, our journey begins with a series of serious studies that lay the foundation for our investigation.
Doe and Jones, in their seminal work, "Consumer Spending Habits in Modern Society," shed light on the intricate web of consumer behavior, exploring how individuals allocate their hard-earned dollars across various categories, including household appliances. The literature provides a comprehensive overview of the dynamics at play, underlining the significance of household spending patterns as indicators of changing consumer preferences. Yet, as we immerse ourselves deeper into this ocean of research, we can't help but marvel at the delightful absurdity that unfolds - it's like discovering a hidden compartment in a refrigerator that leads to a magical universe of statistical oddities.
Turning to real non-fiction books that could tangentially relate to our topic, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offers a captivating examination of unexpected correlations and puzzling phenomena in everyday life. While "Predictably Irrational" by Dan Ariely delves into the quirky and irrational decisions that govern consumer behavior, hinting at the whimsical nature of our spending habits. These works provide a fitting backdrop for our exploration, akin to placing a pair of mismatched socks in the same laundry load - unexpectedly harmonious yet amusingly mismatched.
As we dare to take another leap into the realm of fiction, the titles "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams and "Good Omens" by Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett spring to mind. Both offer whimsical narratives that embrace the absurd and the unexpected, echoing the spirit of our unconventional investigation into the linkage between appliance purchases and online video durations.
In a parallel universe where the connections are as surreal as a talking teapot in an episode of "The Twilight Zone," we explored movies with subtle ties to our research. "The Secret Life of Walter Mitty" and "Back to the Future" may seem like distant cousins to our investigation, but their underlying themes of exploration, discovery, and unexpected connections reflect the essence of our scholarly escapade through the realm of household spending and Deep Look video lengths.
With a jolt of humor and a dash of whimsy, we now plunge into the heart of our analysis, where numbers and YouTube videos collide in a spectacle that will leave readers both astounded and chuckling.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between annual US household spending on major appliances and the total length of Deep Look YouTube videos has uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9818927, with an r-squared of 0.9641132 and p < 0.01 for the time period 2014 to 2022. In other words, our data revealed a connection so strong that it's like finding a perfectly preserved vintage fridge in your grandma's garage – unexpected yet undeniable.
As shown in Fig. 1 (which is so visually stunning, it could almost rival the captivating cinematography of a Deep Look video), the scatterplot illustrates the robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the appliances and the videos secretly conspired to form this bond, whispering inside jokes that only the statistical analysis could unravel.
The strength of this correlation is as surprising as finding a toaster oven that can also brew coffee – it challenges our conventional understanding of consumer behavior and online content consumption. Our findings suggest that as annual household spending on major appliances increases, the total length of Deep Look YouTube videos also surges, creating a parallel trajectory that defies ordinary logic. It's like witnessing a choreographed dance between the hum of a refrigerator and the graceful narration of a Deep Look video, a spectacle both peculiar and mesmerizing.
In essence, our research has waltzed into uncharted territories, revealing connections that are as unexpected as finding a washing machine with a built-in karaoke function. This unorthodox exploration of consumer habits and online entertainment has not only re-defined the boundaries of correlation but has also demonstrated the fascinating interplay between seemingly unrelated facets of modern life. So, grab your favorite snack, settle into your comfiest armchair, and get ready to be amused, surprised, and perhaps even a little baffled by the charming synchronicity of household spending and YouTube video lengths.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have delved into the enigmatic world of consumer spending and online entertainment, unveiling a correlation so robust that it's reminiscent of discovering a hidden treasure trove in your sock drawer. As hinted by Smith et al., our results solidly supported the prior research that identified a peculiar link between annual US household spending on major appliances and the total length of Deep Look YouTube videos. It's as if our research journey captured the essence of a captivating mystery novel, where each clue seamlessly fell into place, leading us to an unexpected but indisputable conclusion.

The lighthearted dig into the literature review, featuring whimsically tangential connections to our topic, offered an entertaining backdrop for our investigation. The non-fiction works such as "Freakonomics" and "Predictably Irrational" echoed the unexpectedness and peculiarity of our findings, much like stumbling upon a beloved childhood toy while cleaning out your attic. These playful nods to the literature underscore the delightful absurdity that has surrounded our scholarly pursuit and have enriched our exploration with a touch of eccentric charm.

Our results have not only confirmed but also magnified the astonishment of this curious linkage. The strength of the correlation between household spending on appliances and the duration of Deep Look videos has left us feeling as if we stumbled upon a rare artifact in a thrift store, thrillingly peculiar and unmistakably captivating. Our unorthodox expedition has not only uncovered a connection but has also presented it in a spellbinding light, akin to a magician revealing a surprising twist in a mesmerizing performance.

In essence, our research journey has mirrored the theme of unexpected connections and whimsical discoveries that echo through everyday life. The lighthearted spirit of our investigation has not only enlivened the scholarly discourse but has also added an element of charm and amusement that beckons the readers into a narrative with unexpected twists and turns. As we marvel at the surprising compatibility of appliance spending and Deep Look video lengths, it's akin to stumbling upon an unusual trinket that unlocks a world of enchanting revelations. So, join us in celebrating the delightful eccentricity of our findings and in embracing the peculiar enchantment of this captivating alliance between consumer habits and online entertainment. Keep a lookout for the unexpected, for in the realm of statistical oddities and scholarly pursuits, surprises are always just around the corner!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on major appliances and Total length of Deep Look YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Great Appliance Adventure: Exploring the Link Between Household Spending and Deep Look Length"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to tackle the burning question that has been on everyone's minds: is there a connection between how much we spend on household appliances and the total length of those captivating Deep Look YouTube videos? To answer this pressing query, our research team delved into data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, embarking on a wacky adventure through the world of consumer spending and online content. Unveiling a correlation coefficient of 0.9818927 and p < 0.01 for the years 2014 to 2022, our findings suggest a remarkably strong relationship between annual US household spending on major appliances and the total length of Deep Look videos. This paper demonstrates how by thinking outside the box (or rather, outside the refrigerator), we can uncover peculiar and unexpected connections that defy conventional wisdom. So, grab your popcorn and get ready to dive into the parallel universe of consumer habits and online entertainment!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In our modern age of convenience and entertainment, the allure of purchasing new household appliances is matched only by the appeal of a binge-worthy YouTube channel. While some may argue that these two seemingly unrelated aspects of contemporary life exist in separate spheres, our research sought to uncover the tantalizing connection between them. We embarked on a journey stranger than fiction, traversing the landscape of consumer spending data and online video content in a quest to unravel the mysterious link between our fascination with kitchen gadgets and the mesmerizing world of Deep Look YouTube videos.
As we delved into the ocean of data provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we couldn't help but marvel at the quirky patterns and unexpected correlations that emerged. It was like stumbling upon the hidden treasure chest of statistical anomalies, where the mundane met the mesmerizing, and the ordinary unexpectedly intertwined with the extraordinary. It was a ride more thrilling than a rollercoaster made entirely of washing machines - and trust us, such a wonder of engineering should definitely exist!
With bated breath, we can now reveal our findings, which left us as startled as a toaster with an inexplicable knack for reciting Shakespeare. Our analysis, spanning the years 2014 to 2022, unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9818927 and p < 0.01, suggesting a strikingly robust relationship between annual US household spending on major appliances and the total length of Deep Look videos. Yes, the connection was as clear as the crystal-clean glass of a brand-new dishwasher - and we were just as puzzled as a malfunctioning microwave at midnight!
Throughout this paper, we will showcase how our unorthodox approach led us to uncover this peculiar bond between consumer habits and online entertainment. So, fasten your seatbelts and adjust your screen brightness, for we are about to traverse the wacky landscape where refrigerators and video length collide in an unexpected symphony of correlation!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between annual US household spending on major appliances and the total length of Deep Look YouTube videos has uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9818927, with an r-squared of 0.9641132 and p < 0.01 for the time period 2014 to 2022. In other words, our data revealed a connection so strong that it's like finding a perfectly preserved vintage fridge in your grandma's garage – unexpected yet undeniable.
As shown in Fig. 1 (which is so visually stunning, it could almost rival the captivating cinematography of a Deep Look video), the scatterplot illustrates the robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the appliances and the videos secretly conspired to form this bond, whispering inside jokes that only the statistical analysis could unravel.
The strength of this correlation is as surprising as finding a toaster oven that can also brew coffee – it challenges our conventional understanding of consumer behavior and online content consumption. Our findings suggest that as annual household spending on major appliances increases, the total length of Deep Look YouTube videos also surges, creating a parallel trajectory that defies ordinary logic. It's like witnessing a choreographed dance between the hum of a refrigerator and the graceful narration of a Deep Look video, a spectacle both peculiar and mesmerizing.
In essence, our research has waltzed into uncharted territories, revealing connections that are as unexpected as finding a washing machine with a built-in karaoke function. This unorthodox exploration of consumer habits and online entertainment has not only re-defined the boundaries of correlation but has also demonstrated the fascinating interplay between seemingly unrelated facets of modern life. So, grab your favorite snack, settle into your comfiest armchair, and get ready to be amused, surprised, and perhaps even a little baffled by the charming synchronicity of household spending and YouTube video lengths.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our odyssey through the labyrinth of household spending and online video content has uncovered a connection so captivating, it's almost as surprising as discovering a hidden ice cream compartment in a refrigerator. The robust correlation we unearthed between annual US household spending on major appliances and the total length of Deep Look YouTube videos is as intriguing as stumbling upon a dishwasher that can also order pizza.

Our findings challenge the traditional understanding of consumer behavior and online content consumption, much like a blender that doubles as a jukebox defies the norms of kitchen appliances. It's clear that as household spending on major appliances increases, the length of Deep Look videos also surges, creating a parallel narrative as captivating as a TV show with unexpected plot twists.

As tempting as it may be to dive deeper into this whimsical realm of appliance-related video content correlations, we must refrain from falling into the rabbit hole more profound than the one Alice encountered. It's safe to say that no more research is needed in this particular area. We've unraveled the enigmatic bond between household spending and YouTube video length, leaving us as astonished as a microwave that suddenly belts out opera arias.

It's been a journey filled with more surprises than a surprise birthday party in a kitchen supply store, and we hope our unconventional approach has left you as entertained as the release of a new episode of Deep Look. With this, we bid adieu to this offbeat adventure, knowing that the world of consumer habits and online entertainment will continue to be a treasure trove of unexpected correlations and quirky revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Great Appliance Adventure: Exploring the Link Between Household Spending and Deep Look Length. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Domestic Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Great Appliance Adventure: Exploring the Link Between Household Spending and Deep Look Length. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Domestic Economics and Advanced Technology Integration (SDEATI)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Great Appliance Adventure: Exploring the Link Between Household Spending and Deep Look Length with an abstract of In this study, we set out to tackle the burning question that has been on everyone's minds: is there a connection between how much we spend on household appliances and the total length of those captivating Deep Look YouTube videos? To answer this pressing query, our research team delved into data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, embarking on a wacky adventure through the world of consumer spending and online content. Unveiling a correlation coefficient of 0.9818927 and p < 0.01 for the years 2014 to 2022, our findings suggest a remarkably strong relationship between annual US household spending on major appliances and the total length of Deep Look videos. This paper demonstrates how by thinking outside the box (or rather, outside the refrigerator), we can uncover peculiar and unexpected connections that defy conventional wisdom. So, grab your popcorn and get ready to dive into the parallel universe of consumer habits and online entertainment!

ChatGPT:

household spending, consumer spending, major appliances, deep look videos, YouTube, bureau of labor statistics, correlation coefficient, data analysis, research findings, consumer habits, online entertainment

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Annual US household spending on major appliances
Detailed data title: Average annual household spend on major appliances
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
See what else correlates with Annual US household spending on major appliances

Total length of Deep Look YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total length of Deep Look YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Total length of Deep Look YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9818927 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9641132 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 96.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total length of Deep Look YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Annual US household spending on major appliances) over the 9 years from 2014 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.6E-6. 0.0000025843940827487560000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 0.00026% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 386,938 random variables You don't actually need 386 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.91, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201420152016201720182019202020212022
Annual US household spending on major appliances (Household spend)233268283280304322354464408
Total length of Deep Look YouTube videos (Total length in seconds)8693836473848285236515792761414310403




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([233,268,283,280,304,322,354,464,408,])
array_2 = np.array([869,3836,4738,4828,5236,5157,9276,14143,10403,])
array_1_name = "Annual US household spending on major appliances"
array_2_name = "Total length of Deep Look YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 4753 · Black Variable ID: 19919 · Red Variable ID: 25945
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0