about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,746 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air quality in Spokane, Washington and the second variable is US Annual Tax Revenue.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The cleaner air led to better fuel combustion, which in turn increased productivity and income. You could say it really fueled the economy, giving everyone a breath of fresh air when it came to their finances!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Create a photo-realistic image showing a vibrant cityscape of Spokane, Washington, with clear blue skies, showcasing the movement of cars and trucks along the roads. The atmosphere should convey efficiency and productivity, with bustling businesses and people engaged in diligent work. The image should capture the positive impact of increased productivity on the economy, without including any words or speech bubbles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air quality in Spokane, Washington and US Annual Tax Revenue. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a funny image you would see on reddit Macabre A photo-realistic image Whimsical illustration Surrealism
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air quality in Spokane, Washington and US Annual Tax Revenue, in the following situation: The cleaner air led to better fuel combustion, which in turn increased productivity and income. You could say it really fueled the economy, giving everyone a breath of fresh air when it came to their finances!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Spokane, Washington, the clear blue sky is filled with the sound of cars and trucks smoothly moving along the roads. The air is crisp and clean, allowing for efficient fuel combustion. As a result, businesses in the area are bustling with activity, and people are working diligently. The increased productivity has led to a boost in annual tax revenue for the US government, creating a positive impact on the economy.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In Spokane, Washington, the clear blue sky is filled with the sound of cars and trucks smoothly moving along the roads. The air is crisp and clean, allowing for efficient fuel combustion. As a result, businesses in the area are bustling with activity, and people are working diligently. The increased productivity has led to a boost in annual tax revenue for the US government, creating a positive impact on the economy. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Create a photo-realistic image showing a vibrant cityscape of Spokane, Washington, with clear blue skies, showcasing the movement of cars and trucks along the roads. The atmosphere should convey efficiency and productivity, with bustling businesses and people engaged in diligent work. The image should capture the positive impact of increased productivity on the economy, without including any words or speech bubbles.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air quality in Spokane, Washington caused US Annual Tax Revenue to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Breathing Easier: Unveiling the Relationship between Air Quality in Spokane, Washington and US Annual Tax Revenue

The Journal of Ecological Economics and Atmospheric Health

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Spokane, Washington and US Annual Tax Revenue. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and About.Com to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8052576 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Breathing Easier: Unveiling the Relationship between Air Quality in Spokane, Washington and US Annual Tax Revenue"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The impact of air quality on our daily lives goes beyond the simple act of breathing. In this study, we delve into the often overlooked link between air quality in Spokane, Washington and US annual tax revenue. Utilizing data meticulously collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and the treasure trove of information from About.Com, our research team embarked on a journey to unravel the enigmatic relationship between smog and fiscal matters. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8052576 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021, our findings provide compelling evidence that cleaner air may lead not only to clearer lungs but also to a healthier fiscal landscape. This study not only sheds light on the financial implications of fresh air, but also serves as a breath of fresh air in the world of environmental economics research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Spokane, Washington and US Annual Tax Revenue. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Breathing Easier: Unveiling the Relationship between Air Quality in Spokane, Washington and US Annual Tax Revenue"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The impact of air quality on our daily lives goes beyond the simple act of breathing. In this study, we delve into the often overlooked link between air quality in Spokane, Washington and US annual tax revenue. Utilizing data meticulously collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and the treasure trove of information from About.Com, our research team embarked on a journey to unravel the enigmatic relationship between smog and fiscal matters. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8052576 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021, our findings provide compelling evidence that cleaner air may lead not only to clearer lungs but also to a healthier fiscal landscape. This study not only sheds light on the financial implications of fresh air, but also serves as a breath of fresh air in the world of environmental economics research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ah, the sweet scent of academic research – or is that just the smell of fresh air? The impact of air quality on our lives extends beyond simple lung health and into the realm of fiscal matters. In this groundbreaking study, we aim to unravel the mysterious link between the air quality in Spokane, Washington, and the US annual tax revenue. But fret not, dear reader, for before we delve into the nitty-gritty details, let us take a moment to appreciate the irony that something as intangible as air can have tangible effects on the money flowing into Uncle Sam’s coffers.

As we proceed, let us not forget that there's more to air quality data than meets the eye. While some may only see a cloud of statistics, we are here to blow away the smog of confusion surrounding this complex relationship. Hold onto your hats, folks, as we navigate through the fog of research and soar to new heights in our understanding of the impacts of air quality on the economy.

Indeed, by painstakingly collecting data – we’re talking spreadsheets on spreadsheets, folks – from the Environmental Protection Agency and seeking wisdom from the oracle of About.Com, our intrepid research team set out on a quest far more daring than any knight on horseback. Our mission? To clarify the relationship between air quality and fiscal health with as much vigor as a brisk walk in a park on a crisp autumn day.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.8052576 (cue the applause) and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 1980 to 2021, we've got numbers that would make even the most seasoned statistician do a double take. It seems our findings provide compelling evidence that cleaner air not only clears the lungs but also clears a path toward a robust fiscal landscape. Our research promises to shake the foundations of environmental economics, offering a breath of fresh air in this arena of study.

So, dear reader, buckle up and join us on this exhilarating journey as we peel back the layers of this intriguing connection between air quality in Spokane and the coffers of the United States. And who knows, by the end of this, you may just find yourself gasping for more research on this captivating topic!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Spokane, Washington and US Annual Tax Revenue. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Breathing Easier: Unveiling the Relationship between Air Quality in Spokane, Washington and US Annual Tax Revenue"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The impact of air quality on our daily lives goes beyond the simple act of breathing. In this study, we delve into the often overlooked link between air quality in Spokane, Washington and US annual tax revenue. Utilizing data meticulously collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and the treasure trove of information from About.Com, our research team embarked on a journey to unravel the enigmatic relationship between smog and fiscal matters. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8052576 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021, our findings provide compelling evidence that cleaner air may lead not only to clearer lungs but also to a healthier fiscal landscape. This study not only sheds light on the financial implications of fresh air, but also serves as a breath of fresh air in the world of environmental economics research.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the sweet scent of academic research – or is that just the smell of fresh air? The impact of air quality on our lives extends beyond simple lung health and into the realm of fiscal matters. In this groundbreaking study, we aim to unravel the mysterious link between the air quality in Spokane, Washington, and the US annual tax revenue. But fret not, dear reader, for before we delve into the nitty-gritty details, let us take a moment to appreciate the irony that something as intangible as air can have tangible effects on the money flowing into Uncle Sam’s coffers.
As we proceed, let us not forget that there's more to air quality data than meets the eye. While some may only see a cloud of statistics, we are here to blow away the smog of confusion surrounding this complex relationship. Hold onto your hats, folks, as we navigate through the fog of research and soar to new heights in our understanding of the impacts of air quality on the economy.
Indeed, by painstakingly collecting data – we’re talking spreadsheets on spreadsheets, folks – from the Environmental Protection Agency and seeking wisdom from the oracle of About.Com, our intrepid research team set out on a quest far more daring than any knight on horseback. Our mission? To clarify the relationship between air quality and fiscal health with as much vigor as a brisk walk in a park on a crisp autumn day.
With a correlation coefficient of 0.8052576 (cue the applause) and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 1980 to 2021, we've got numbers that would make even the most seasoned statistician do a double take. It seems our findings provide compelling evidence that cleaner air not only clears the lungs but also clears a path toward a robust fiscal landscape. Our research promises to shake the foundations of environmental economics, offering a breath of fresh air in this arena of study.
So, dear reader, buckle up and join us on this exhilarating journey as we peel back the layers of this intriguing connection between air quality in Spokane and the coffers of the United States. And who knows, by the end of this, you may just find yourself gasping for more research on this captivating topic!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the pursuit of unraveling the enigmatic relationship between air quality in Spokane, Washington, and US annual tax revenue, we turn to the existing body of literature for guidance. From the outset, the seminal work of Smith et al. sheds light on the impact of air pollution on economic productivity, laying the foundation for our investigation into the potential fiscal repercussions of cleaner air. However, as we venture deeper into the literature, we encounter a smorgasbord of sources that are as diverse as the air particles they seek to scrutinize.

Doe's comprehensive analysis, in "Economic Implications of Air Quality in Urban Environments," presents compelling evidence of the adverse effects of poor air quality on national economic performance, providing a compelling backdrop to our exploration. Nevertheless, as we dig even further, we stumble upon Jones' work, "The Invisible Tax: Air Quality and Fiscal Policy," which, much like a gust of wind, blows open the doors to the unexplored territories of how air quality intertwines with fiscal matters.

Venturing beyond the confines of strictly economic literature, we wade into the depths of non-fiction books such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "This Changes Everything" by Naomi Klein, both of which, in their own right, offer intriguing insights into the intricate web of environmental issues and their potential impact on societal structures. However, mixing things up like a breath of fresh air, we also draw inspiration from fictional works like "The Air He Breathes" by Brittainy C. Cherry and "The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle" by Haruki Murakami, integrating the realm of imagination into our examination of the tangible connection between air quality and tax revenue.

In addition to these literary muses, one cannot discount the influence of entertainment and games on our understanding of complex relationships. As we peruse the likes of "Smog: The Board Game" and "Monopoly: Pollution Edition," we are reminded of the pervasive nature of air quality issues and their potential to intertwine with fiscal dynamics. While the correlations between these amusements and our research are undoubtedly loose, their whimsical names evoke a sense of levity and playfulness that serves as a breath of fresh air in the otherwise serious realm of academic inquiry.

Armed with this eclectic array of sources, we stand poised to navigate the labyrinthine corridors of air quality and fiscal well-being, prepared to challenge convention and breathe new life into the discourse surrounding this esoteric connection. The stage is set, dear reader, for us to unravel the intricacies of this thought-provoking relationship with the gusto of a tango in a clearing filled with fresh mountain air. Onward we march, for the wind of knowledge beckons, and the financial repercussions of clean air await our scholarly scrutiny.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Spokane, Washington and US Annual Tax Revenue. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and About.Com . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Breathing Easier: Unveiling the Relationship between Air Quality in Spokane, Washington and US Annual Tax Revenue"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The impact of air quality on our daily lives goes beyond the simple act of breathing. In this study, we delve into the often overlooked link between air quality in Spokane, Washington and US annual tax revenue. Utilizing data meticulously collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and the treasure trove of information from About.Com, our research team embarked on a journey to unravel the enigmatic relationship between smog and fiscal matters. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8052576 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021, our findings provide compelling evidence that cleaner air may lead not only to clearer lungs but also to a healthier fiscal landscape. This study not only sheds light on the financial implications of fresh air, but also serves as a breath of fresh air in the world of environmental economics research.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the sweet scent of academic research – or is that just the smell of fresh air? The impact of air quality on our lives extends beyond simple lung health and into the realm of fiscal matters. In this groundbreaking study, we aim to unravel the mysterious link between the air quality in Spokane, Washington, and the US annual tax revenue. But fret not, dear reader, for before we delve into the nitty-gritty details, let us take a moment to appreciate the irony that something as intangible as air can have tangible effects on the money flowing into Uncle Sam’s coffers.
As we proceed, let us not forget that there's more to air quality data than meets the eye. While some may only see a cloud of statistics, we are here to blow away the smog of confusion surrounding this complex relationship. Hold onto your hats, folks, as we navigate through the fog of research and soar to new heights in our understanding of the impacts of air quality on the economy.
Indeed, by painstakingly collecting data – we’re talking spreadsheets on spreadsheets, folks – from the Environmental Protection Agency and seeking wisdom from the oracle of About.Com, our intrepid research team set out on a quest far more daring than any knight on horseback. Our mission? To clarify the relationship between air quality and fiscal health with as much vigor as a brisk walk in a park on a crisp autumn day.
With a correlation coefficient of 0.8052576 (cue the applause) and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 1980 to 2021, we've got numbers that would make even the most seasoned statistician do a double take. It seems our findings provide compelling evidence that cleaner air not only clears the lungs but also clears a path toward a robust fiscal landscape. Our research promises to shake the foundations of environmental economics, offering a breath of fresh air in this arena of study.
So, dear reader, buckle up and join us on this exhilarating journey as we peel back the layers of this intriguing connection between air quality in Spokane and the coffers of the United States. And who knows, by the end of this, you may just find yourself gasping for more research on this captivating topic!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To start our quest for enlightenment, we first had to gather a veritable smorgasbord of data related to air quality in Spokane and US annual tax revenue. We scoured the virtual plains of the internet, armed with our trusty keyboards and a plethora of caffeinated beverages, extracting valuable information from the Environmental Protection Agency and the bounty of knowledge bestowed upon us by About.Com.

Next, we meticulously combed through the treasure trove of data spanning from 1980 to 2021 like a band of digital archaeologists, armed with Excel spreadsheets instead of shovels. Our team spared no effort in navigating the labyrinth of statistics, knowing that the truth lay buried within the columns and rows of numerical relics.

Once we had assembled an impressive collection of data, it was time to unleash the power of statistical analysis. Armed with an arsenal of analytical tools and an unwavering dedication to precision, we set about unraveling the enigmatic relationship between air quality and fiscal matters. We employed the venerable correlation coefficient to quantify the degree of association between the two variables, and our results left us with a coefficient of 0.8052576 that begged for a standing ovation.

In addition, we subjected our data to the rigorous scrutiny of the illustrious p-value test, which provided us with a value less than 0.01. This evidence left little room for doubt and had even the most seasoned statistician doing a double take.

Furthermore, we employed a host of complex econometric modeling techniques to disentangle the web of causality between air quality in Spokane and US annual tax revenue. Our models, akin to intrepid explorers hacking through the dense undergrowth of economic data, illuminated the intricate pathways through which cleaner air may pave the way for a healthier fiscal landscape.

In summary, our methodology represents a convergence of exhaustive data collection, steadfast statistical analysis, and the dogged pursuit of unraveling the seemingly ethereal connection between air quality and fiscal matters. Just as a gentle breeze can gradually clear the haze, our methodology sought to bring clarity to this complex relationship through rigorous and, dare we say, awe-inspiring methods.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Spokane, Washington and US Annual Tax Revenue. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and About.Com .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8052576, r-squared of 0.6484399, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Breathing Easier: Unveiling the Relationship between Air Quality in Spokane, Washington and US Annual Tax Revenue"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The impact of air quality on our daily lives goes beyond the simple act of breathing. In this study, we delve into the often overlooked link between air quality in Spokane, Washington and US annual tax revenue. Utilizing data meticulously collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and the treasure trove of information from About.Com, our research team embarked on a journey to unravel the enigmatic relationship between smog and fiscal matters. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8052576 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021, our findings provide compelling evidence that cleaner air may lead not only to clearer lungs but also to a healthier fiscal landscape. This study not only sheds light on the financial implications of fresh air, but also serves as a breath of fresh air in the world of environmental economics research.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ah, the sweet scent of academic research – or is that just the smell of fresh air? The impact of air quality on our lives extends beyond simple lung health and into the realm of fiscal matters. In this groundbreaking study, we aim to unravel the mysterious link between the air quality in Spokane, Washington, and the US annual tax revenue. But fret not, dear reader, for before we delve into the nitty-gritty details, let us take a moment to appreciate the irony that something as intangible as air can have tangible effects on the money flowing into Uncle Sam’s coffers.
As we proceed, let us not forget that there's more to air quality data than meets the eye. While some may only see a cloud of statistics, we are here to blow away the smog of confusion surrounding this complex relationship. Hold onto your hats, folks, as we navigate through the fog of research and soar to new heights in our understanding of the impacts of air quality on the economy.
Indeed, by painstakingly collecting data – we’re talking spreadsheets on spreadsheets, folks – from the Environmental Protection Agency and seeking wisdom from the oracle of About.Com, our intrepid research team set out on a quest far more daring than any knight on horseback. Our mission? To clarify the relationship between air quality and fiscal health with as much vigor as a brisk walk in a park on a crisp autumn day.
With a correlation coefficient of 0.8052576 (cue the applause) and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 1980 to 2021, we've got numbers that would make even the most seasoned statistician do a double take. It seems our findings provide compelling evidence that cleaner air not only clears the lungs but also clears a path toward a robust fiscal landscape. Our research promises to shake the foundations of environmental economics, offering a breath of fresh air in this arena of study.
So, dear reader, buckle up and join us on this exhilarating journey as we peel back the layers of this intriguing connection between air quality in Spokane and the coffers of the United States. And who knows, by the end of this, you may just find yourself gasping for more research on this captivating topic!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The connection between air quality in Spokane, Washington and US annual tax revenue has been unveiled, shedding light on a relationship as intriguing as a suspense novel and as impactful as a gust of wind. Our data analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8052576, indicating a strong positive relationship between air quality and tax revenue. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.6484399, underscoring the substantial influence of air quality on fiscal matters.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually encapsulates this relationship, depicting the tight clustering of data points around the upward trend line with the finesse of a symphony conductor leading a crescendo. Each data point whispers a tale of its own, collectively harmonizing to illustrate the remarkable connection we've uncovered.

With a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 1980 to 2021, these findings not only resonate with statistical significance but also resonate with the endless possibilities of what the future holds. This discovery offers a breath of fresh air in the realm of environmental economics, emphasizing the profound impact of air quality on fiscal landscapes.

In conclusion, our research has not only breathed life into the intricate relationship between air quality in Spokane, Washington and US annual tax revenue but has also breathed vitality into the field of environmental economics. These findings provide a robust foundation for further exploration of the impacts of air quality on fiscal health, inviting future researchers to join us in this exhilarating exploration of the interplay between airy atmospheres and financial fortunes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Spokane, Washington and US Annual Tax Revenue. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Breathing Easier: Unveiling the Relationship between Air Quality in Spokane, Washington and US Annual Tax Revenue"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The impact of air quality on our daily lives goes beyond the simple act of breathing. In this study, we delve into the often overlooked link between air quality in Spokane, Washington and US annual tax revenue. Utilizing data meticulously collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and the treasure trove of information from About.Com, our research team embarked on a journey to unravel the enigmatic relationship between smog and fiscal matters. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8052576 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021, our findings provide compelling evidence that cleaner air may lead not only to clearer lungs but also to a healthier fiscal landscape. This study not only sheds light on the financial implications of fresh air, but also serves as a breath of fresh air in the world of environmental economics research.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the pursuit of unraveling the enigmatic relationship between air quality in Spokane, Washington, and US annual tax revenue, we turn to the existing body of literature for guidance. From the outset, the seminal work of Smith et al. sheds light on the impact of air pollution on economic productivity, laying the foundation for our investigation into the potential fiscal repercussions of cleaner air. However, as we venture deeper into the literature, we encounter a smorgasbord of sources that are as diverse as the air particles they seek to scrutinize.
Doe's comprehensive analysis, in "Economic Implications of Air Quality in Urban Environments," presents compelling evidence of the adverse effects of poor air quality on national economic performance, providing a compelling backdrop to our exploration. Nevertheless, as we dig even further, we stumble upon Jones' work, "The Invisible Tax: Air Quality and Fiscal Policy," which, much like a gust of wind, blows open the doors to the unexplored territories of how air quality intertwines with fiscal matters.
Venturing beyond the confines of strictly economic literature, we wade into the depths of non-fiction books such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "This Changes Everything" by Naomi Klein, both of which, in their own right, offer intriguing insights into the intricate web of environmental issues and their potential impact on societal structures. However, mixing things up like a breath of fresh air, we also draw inspiration from fictional works like "The Air He Breathes" by Brittainy C. Cherry and "The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle" by Haruki Murakami, integrating the realm of imagination into our examination of the tangible connection between air quality and tax revenue.
In addition to these literary muses, one cannot discount the influence of entertainment and games on our understanding of complex relationships. As we peruse the likes of "Smog: The Board Game" and "Monopoly: Pollution Edition," we are reminded of the pervasive nature of air quality issues and their potential to intertwine with fiscal dynamics. While the correlations between these amusements and our research are undoubtedly loose, their whimsical names evoke a sense of levity and playfulness that serves as a breath of fresh air in the otherwise serious realm of academic inquiry.
Armed with this eclectic array of sources, we stand poised to navigate the labyrinthine corridors of air quality and fiscal well-being, prepared to challenge convention and breathe new life into the discourse surrounding this esoteric connection. The stage is set, dear reader, for us to unravel the intricacies of this thought-provoking relationship with the gusto of a tango in a clearing filled with fresh mountain air. Onward we march, for the wind of knowledge beckons, and the financial repercussions of clean air await our scholarly scrutiny.

[[RESULTS]]
The connection between air quality in Spokane, Washington and US annual tax revenue has been unveiled, shedding light on a relationship as intriguing as a suspense novel and as impactful as a gust of wind. Our data analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8052576, indicating a strong positive relationship between air quality and tax revenue. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.6484399, underscoring the substantial influence of air quality on fiscal matters.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually encapsulates this relationship, depicting the tight clustering of data points around the upward trend line with the finesse of a symphony conductor leading a crescendo. Each data point whispers a tale of its own, collectively harmonizing to illustrate the remarkable connection we've uncovered.
With a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 1980 to 2021, these findings not only resonate with statistical significance but also resonate with the endless possibilities of what the future holds. This discovery offers a breath of fresh air in the realm of environmental economics, emphasizing the profound impact of air quality on fiscal landscapes.
In conclusion, our research has not only breathed life into the intricate relationship between air quality in Spokane, Washington and US annual tax revenue but has also breathed vitality into the field of environmental economics. These findings provide a robust foundation for further exploration of the impacts of air quality on fiscal health, inviting future researchers to join us in this exhilarating exploration of the interplay between airy atmospheres and financial fortunes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

As we ponder the implications of our findings, it becomes abundantly clear that the connection between air quality and tax revenue is indeed as tangible as the air we breathe – and just as vital to the ebb and flow of economic prosperity. Our results not only substantiate the work of Smith et al. and Doe, but they also add a dash of color to the canvas of knowledge, much like a vibrant sunset illuminating a smog-free skyline.

The strong positive correlation between air quality in Spokane, Washington and US annual tax revenue mirrors the unmistakable bond between a kite and the wind – when the air is clean, tax revenue soars. This observation not only adds weight to the existing body of literature but also propels us forward, akin to a gust of fresh air breathing life into our scholarly endeavors.

Our data uncovered a robust correlation coefficient, akin to the robust aroma of freshly brewed coffee on a crisp morning, serving as a testament to the profound impact of fresh air on fiscal matters. The r-squared value further underscores the influential power of air quality, akin to the robust roots of a mighty oak tree grounding the financial landscape in its grasp.

The scatterplot visualization, much like a piece of intricate artwork, not only portrays the relationship between air quality and tax revenue with eloquence but also beckons us to marvel at the symphony of data points, much like a grand orchestra captivating our senses. It is a visual representation that encapsulates the interconnectedness of our findings, much like the intricate web of spider silk adorning a dew-kissed morning.

Our results, supported by statistical significance, not only unveil the potential financial windfall of clean air but also breathe fresh vitality into the field of environmental economics, enlivening the discourse like a refreshing breeze on a sweltering summer day. It is evident that our exploration has not merely scratched the surface of this complex interplay but has nudged the envelope of understanding, much like a gentle zephyr nudging a wind chime into mellifluous melody.

In essence, our findings advocate for a reinvigorated focus on the undeniable relationship between air quality and fiscal well-being, highlighting the need for continued scholarly scrutiny of this intriguing connection. We stand on the precipice of an exhilarating exploration, akin to a turbulent gust of wind heralding the unfolding adventure that awaits as we further navigate this remarkable association.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Spokane, Washington and US Annual Tax Revenue. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Breathing Easier: Unveiling the Relationship between Air Quality in Spokane, Washington and US Annual Tax Revenue"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The impact of air quality on our daily lives goes beyond the simple act of breathing. In this study, we delve into the often overlooked link between air quality in Spokane, Washington and US annual tax revenue. Utilizing data meticulously collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and the treasure trove of information from About.Com, our research team embarked on a journey to unravel the enigmatic relationship between smog and fiscal matters. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8052576 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021, our findings provide compelling evidence that cleaner air may lead not only to clearer lungs but also to a healthier fiscal landscape. This study not only sheds light on the financial implications of fresh air, but also serves as a breath of fresh air in the world of environmental economics research.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ah, the sweet scent of academic research – or is that just the smell of fresh air? The impact of air quality on our lives extends beyond simple lung health and into the realm of fiscal matters. In this groundbreaking study, we aim to unravel the mysterious link between the air quality in Spokane, Washington, and the US annual tax revenue. But fret not, dear reader, for before we delve into the nitty-gritty details, let us take a moment to appreciate the irony that something as intangible as air can have tangible effects on the money flowing into Uncle Sam’s coffers.
As we proceed, let us not forget that there's more to air quality data than meets the eye. While some may only see a cloud of statistics, we are here to blow away the smog of confusion surrounding this complex relationship. Hold onto your hats, folks, as we navigate through the fog of research and soar to new heights in our understanding of the impacts of air quality on the economy.
Indeed, by painstakingly collecting data – we’re talking spreadsheets on spreadsheets, folks – from the Environmental Protection Agency and seeking wisdom from the oracle of About.Com, our intrepid research team set out on a quest far more daring than any knight on horseback. Our mission? To clarify the relationship between air quality and fiscal health with as much vigor as a brisk walk in a park on a crisp autumn day.
With a correlation coefficient of 0.8052576 (cue the applause) and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 1980 to 2021, we've got numbers that would make even the most seasoned statistician do a double take. It seems our findings provide compelling evidence that cleaner air not only clears the lungs but also clears a path toward a robust fiscal landscape. Our research promises to shake the foundations of environmental economics, offering a breath of fresh air in this arena of study.
So, dear reader, buckle up and join us on this exhilarating journey as we peel back the layers of this intriguing connection between air quality in Spokane and the coffers of the United States. And who knows, by the end of this, you may just find yourself gasping for more research on this captivating topic!

[[RESULTS]]
The connection between air quality in Spokane, Washington and US annual tax revenue has been unveiled, shedding light on a relationship as intriguing as a suspense novel and as impactful as a gust of wind. Our data analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8052576, indicating a strong positive relationship between air quality and tax revenue. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.6484399, underscoring the substantial influence of air quality on fiscal matters.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually encapsulates this relationship, depicting the tight clustering of data points around the upward trend line with the finesse of a symphony conductor leading a crescendo. Each data point whispers a tale of its own, collectively harmonizing to illustrate the remarkable connection we've uncovered.
With a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 1980 to 2021, these findings not only resonate with statistical significance but also resonate with the endless possibilities of what the future holds. This discovery offers a breath of fresh air in the realm of environmental economics, emphasizing the profound impact of air quality on fiscal landscapes.
In conclusion, our research has not only breathed life into the intricate relationship between air quality in Spokane, Washington and US annual tax revenue but has also breathed vitality into the field of environmental economics. These findings provide a robust foundation for further exploration of the impacts of air quality on fiscal health, inviting future researchers to join us in this exhilarating exploration of the interplay between airy atmospheres and financial fortunes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the grand scheme of things, our research has brought to light the unexpected interplay of two seemingly distant realms: the air we breathe and the dollars we spend. Our findings have breathed new life into the world of environmental economics, revealing a relationship as exhilarating as a gust of wind and as robust as a bear market turning bullish. The correlation coefficient of 0.8052576 and the enchantment of the p-value being less than 0.01 have not only piqued our interest but also sent us soaring with wonder.
As we bid adieu to this captivating journey, it's important to acknowledge that this study has lifted the veil on a connection as evasive as a gentle breeze, showing the intricacies of how air quality dances with fiscal matters. However, we must also recognize the limits of our own findings and remind ourselves that while they may clear the air, there is more research needed to fully understand the depth of this relationship. But for now, we can rest easy knowing that our work has laid a solid foundation for future explorations. Therefore, it is with confidence that we declare no further research is needed in this area. After all, we wouldn't want to be accused of blowing hot air now, would we?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Breathing Easier: Unveiling the Relationship between Air Quality in Spokane, Washington and US Annual Tax Revenue. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Economics and Atmospheric Health


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Breathing Easier: Unveiling the Relationship between Air Quality in Spokane, Washington and US Annual Tax Revenue. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Atmospheric and Economic Research (SAER)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Breathing Easier: Unveiling the Relationship between Air Quality in Spokane, Washington and US Annual Tax Revenue with an abstract of The impact of air quality on our daily lives goes beyond the simple act of breathing. In this study, we delve into the often overlooked link between air quality in Spokane, Washington and US annual tax revenue. Utilizing data meticulously collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and the treasure trove of information from About.Com, our research team embarked on a journey to unravel the enigmatic relationship between smog and fiscal matters. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8052576 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2021, our findings provide compelling evidence that cleaner air may lead not only to clearer lungs but also to a healthier fiscal landscape. This study not only sheds light on the financial implications of fresh air, but also serves as a breath of fresh air in the world of environmental economics research.

ChatGPT:

air quality, Spokane Washington, US annual tax revenue, correlation coefficient, p-value, Environmental Protection Agency data, About.Com data, fiscal implications of air quality, environmental economics, smog analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air quality in Spokane, Washington
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with good air quality in Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in Spokane, Washington

US Annual Tax Revenue
Source: About.Com
See what else correlates with US Annual Tax Revenue

Correlation r = 0.8052576 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6484399 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 64.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., US Annual Tax Revenue) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air quality in Spokane, Washington) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.3E-10. 0.0000000001278819072018089000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.81 in 1.3E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 7,819,714,468 random variables You don't actually need 7 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.66, 0.89 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air quality in Spokane, Washington (Good air quality)7.3770512.602719.72622.739733.333333.972630.41127.945230.601141.917827.671232.054834.426238.356244.931551.506963.114869.86367.123367.945254.91855.616451.780845.205543.169451.232949.58958.082259.289662.465863.287763.013762.021957.534261.643860.164871.311557.808261.369969.041169.672165.2055
US Annual Tax Revenue (Trillions of Dollars)0.5170.5990.6180.6010.6660.7340.7690.8540.9090.9911.031.051.091.151.261.351.451.581.721.822.031.991.851.721.882.152.42.572.522.12.162.32.452.783.023.253.273.323.333.463.424.05




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7.37705,12.6027,19.726,22.7397,33.3333,33.9726,30.411,27.9452,30.6011,41.9178,27.6712,32.0548,34.4262,38.3562,44.9315,51.5069,63.1148,69.863,67.1233,67.9452,54.918,55.6164,51.7808,45.2055,43.1694,51.2329,49.589,58.0822,59.2896,62.4658,63.2877,63.0137,62.0219,57.5342,61.6438,60.1648,71.3115,57.8082,61.3699,69.0411,69.6721,65.2055,])
array_2 = np.array([0.517,0.599,0.618,0.601,0.666,0.734,0.769,0.854,0.909,0.991,1.03,1.05,1.09,1.15,1.26,1.35,1.45,1.58,1.72,1.82,2.03,1.99,1.85,1.72,1.88,2.15,2.4,2.57,2.52,2.1,2.16,2.3,2.45,2.78,3.02,3.25,3.27,3.32,3.33,3.46,3.42,4.05,])
array_1_name = "Air quality in Spokane, Washington"
array_2_name = "US Annual Tax Revenue"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 4746 · Black Variable ID: 21287 · Red Variable ID: 507
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0