about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,679 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are and the second variable is The number of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As the number of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma decreases, there are fewer people available to help generate clever and thought-provoking video title ideas. This leads to a decline in the overall insightfulness of Extra History YouTube video titles. It turns out, behind every great video title, there may have been an overworked and underappreciated administrative assistant in Oklahoma, tirelessly brainstorming away! With less assistance in the state, the ability to craft truly extraordinary and enlightening video titles takes a hit. Who would have thought that the key to unlocking the brilliance of Extra History lay in the hands of the hardworking administrative professionals of Oklahoma?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars', depicting this scene: In a quiet Oklahoma office, the number of executive administrative assistants dwindles as they work diligently to generate brilliant and insightful video titles for Extra History YouTube videos. With each assistant hard at work brainstorming, the impact of their effort is evident as the exceptional and thought-provoking video titles come to life. But as the number of assistants decreases, the bustling creativity of the office slowly dwindles, reflecting the diminishing pool of innovative titles for the videos. Improvement: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars', depicting this scene: In a quiet Oklahoma office, the number of executive administrative assistants dwindles as they work diligently to generate brilliant and insightful video titles for Extra History YouTube videos. Each assistant surrounded by holographic displays, projecting captivating and thought-provoking video titles coming to life through their brainstorming efforts. Yet, as the number of assistants decreases, the bustling creativity of the office slowly dwindles, reflecting the diminishing pool of innovative titles for the videos. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are and The number of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Minimalism Voxel art Oragami Glitch art
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are and The number of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma, in the following situation: As the number of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma decreases, there are fewer people available to help generate clever and thought-provoking video title ideas. This leads to a decline in the overall insightfulness of Extra History YouTube video titles. It turns out, behind every great video title, there may have been an overworked and underappreciated administrative assistant in Oklahoma, tirelessly brainstorming away! With less assistance in the state, the ability to craft truly extraordinary and enlightening video titles takes a hit. Who would have thought that the key to unlocking the brilliance of Extra History lay in the hands of the hardworking administrative professionals of Oklahoma?. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a quiet Oklahoma office, the number of executive administrative assistants dwindles as they work diligently to generate brilliant and insightful video titles for Extra History YouTube videos. With each assistant hard at work brainstorming, the impact of their effort is evident as the exceptional and thought-provoking video titles come to life. But as the number of assistants decreases, the bustling creativity of the office slowly dwindles, reflecting the diminishing pool of innovative titles for the videos.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' ] and depicting this scene: In a quiet Oklahoma office, the number of executive administrative assistants dwindles as they work diligently to generate brilliant and insightful video titles for Extra History YouTube videos. With each assistant hard at work brainstorming, the impact of their effort is evident as the exceptional and thought-provoking video titles come to life. But as the number of assistants decreases, the bustling creativity of the office slowly dwindles, reflecting the diminishing pool of innovative titles for the videos. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars', depicting this scene: In a quiet Oklahoma office, the number of executive administrative assistants dwindles as they work diligently to generate brilliant and insightful video titles for Extra History YouTube videos. With each assistant hard at work brainstorming, the impact of their effort is evident as the exceptional and thought-provoking video titles come to life. But as the number of assistants decreases, the bustling creativity of the office slowly dwindles, reflecting the diminishing pool of innovative titles for the videos. Improvement: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars', depicting this scene: In a quiet Oklahoma office, the number of executive administrative assistants dwindles as they work diligently to generate brilliant and insightful video titles for Extra History YouTube videos. Each assistant surrounded by holographic displays, projecting captivating and thought-provoking video titles coming to life through their brainstorming efforts. Yet, as the number of assistants decreases, the bustling creativity of the office slowly dwindles, reflecting the diminishing pool of innovative titles for the videos.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are caused The number of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Evaluating the Correlation between the Insightfulness of Extra History YouTube Video Titles and the Number of Executive Administrative Assistants in Oklahoma: A Serious Study with a Silly Twist

The Journal of Quirky Interdisciplinary Studies

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are and The number of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9073295 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Evaluating the Correlation between the Insightfulness of Extra History YouTube Video Titles and the Number of Executive Administrative Assistants in Oklahoma: A Serious Study with a Silly Twist"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an unconventional investigation into the potential connection between the intriguingly crafted titles of Extra History YouTube videos and the employment trends of executive administrative assistants in the state of Oklahoma. Our research team set out to shed light on this peculiar relationship, employing AI analysis of video titles and Bureau of Labor Statistics data to investigate this lighthearted yet thought-provoking topic.

In the pursuit of academic rigor and a good laugh, our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9073295, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2022. This suggests that there may indeed be a curious relationship between the wittiness of YouTube video titles and the employment landscape for executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma.

As we delve further into the data, one might ask, "What did the YouTube video titles say to the executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma?" They may have quipped, "You're hired! We've got a 'history' of needing your 'extra' assistance."

Our paper not only contributes to the discourse on unconventional correlations but also serves as a friendly reminder that even in the seriousness of academic research, a touch of humor can go a long way in making unexpected connections. After all, who says research can't be as enjoyable as a good dad joke?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are and The number of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Evaluating the Correlation between the Insightfulness of Extra History YouTube Video Titles and the Number of Executive Administrative Assistants in Oklahoma: A Serious Study with a Silly Twist"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an unconventional investigation into the potential connection between the intriguingly crafted titles of Extra History YouTube videos and the employment trends of executive administrative assistants in the state of Oklahoma. Our research team set out to shed light on this peculiar relationship, employing AI analysis of video titles and Bureau of Labor Statistics data to investigate this lighthearted yet thought-provoking topic.

In the pursuit of academic rigor and a good laugh, our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9073295, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2022. This suggests that there may indeed be a curious relationship between the wittiness of YouTube video titles and the employment landscape for executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma.

As we delve further into the data, one might ask, "What did the YouTube video titles say to the executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma?" They may have quipped, "You're hired! We've got a 'history' of needing your 'extra' assistance."

Our paper not only contributes to the discourse on unconventional correlations but also serves as a friendly reminder that even in the seriousness of academic research, a touch of humor can go a long way in making unexpected connections. After all, who says research can't be as enjoyable as a good dad joke?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The correlation between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a subject of interest for researchers, prompting investigations into the most unexpected pairings. Within this realm of inquiry, our study introduces an unlikely, yet intriguing, connection - the relationship between the insightfulness of YouTube video titles and the number of executive administrative assistants in the state of Oklahoma. This investigation embraces a lighthearted approach to pose a thought-provoking question: could the flair and quirkiness of Extra History YouTube video titles have an impact on the employment trends of executive administrative assistants?

Humor and seriousness often make for an effective combination. Some may say they're like peanut butter and jelly - they just go together. In the spirit of this fusion, our research seeks to explore the potential association between the witty demeanor of video titles and the professional landscape of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma. Can seemingly unrelated entities be tied together in a surprising yet cogent manner? Our findings aim to address this question with empirical rigor and a sprinkle of levity, for good measure.

At the heart of our investigation lies the intersection of data analysis and a touch of whimsy. As we unravel the connection between the captivating nature of Extra History video titles and the state's employment dynamics, we also recognize the importance of maintaining a good sense of humor throughout. Besides, what research endeavor couldn't use a little dose of levity? After all, an unexpected correlation might just be hiding behind a well-crafted pun.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are and The number of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Evaluating the Correlation between the Insightfulness of Extra History YouTube Video Titles and the Number of Executive Administrative Assistants in Oklahoma: A Serious Study with a Silly Twist"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an unconventional investigation into the potential connection between the intriguingly crafted titles of Extra History YouTube videos and the employment trends of executive administrative assistants in the state of Oklahoma. Our research team set out to shed light on this peculiar relationship, employing AI analysis of video titles and Bureau of Labor Statistics data to investigate this lighthearted yet thought-provoking topic.

In the pursuit of academic rigor and a good laugh, our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9073295, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2022. This suggests that there may indeed be a curious relationship between the wittiness of YouTube video titles and the employment landscape for executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma.

As we delve further into the data, one might ask, "What did the YouTube video titles say to the executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma?" They may have quipped, "You're hired! We've got a 'history' of needing your 'extra' assistance."

Our paper not only contributes to the discourse on unconventional correlations but also serves as a friendly reminder that even in the seriousness of academic research, a touch of humor can go a long way in making unexpected connections. After all, who says research can't be as enjoyable as a good dad joke?

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The correlation between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a subject of interest for researchers, prompting investigations into the most unexpected pairings. Within this realm of inquiry, our study introduces an unlikely, yet intriguing, connection - the relationship between the insightfulness of YouTube video titles and the number of executive administrative assistants in the state of Oklahoma. This investigation embraces a lighthearted approach to pose a thought-provoking question: could the flair and quirkiness of Extra History YouTube video titles have an impact on the employment trends of executive administrative assistants?
Humor and seriousness often make for an effective combination. Some may say they're like peanut butter and jelly - they just go together. In the spirit of this fusion, our research seeks to explore the potential association between the witty demeanor of video titles and the professional landscape of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma. Can seemingly unrelated entities be tied together in a surprising yet cogent manner? Our findings aim to address this question with empirical rigor and a sprinkle of levity, for good measure.
At the heart of our investigation lies the intersection of data analysis and a touch of whimsy. As we unravel the connection between the captivating nature of Extra History video titles and the state's employment dynamics, we also recognize the importance of maintaining a good sense of humor throughout. Besides, what research endeavor couldn't use a little dose of levity? After all, an unexpected correlation might just be hiding behind a well-crafted pun.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their study "The Role of Video Content in the Digital Era," Smith and Doe provide a comprehensive analysis of the impact of video content on viewer engagement. The authors show a clear correlation between the quality of video titles and audience attraction, highlighting the significance of linguistic appeal in capturing attention. Similarly, Jones and Smith, in "The Psychology of Online Engagement," delve into the cognitive processes underlying user interaction with online media and emphasize the role of intriguing titles in drawing viewers.

Now, let's take a step into the unexpected as we explore the unconventional correlation between YouTube video titles and the number of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma. While this inquiry may elicit a raised eyebrow or two, our research unveils a surprising connection, much like finding a sprinkles-laden donut in a box of office supplies - completely unexpected yet oddly fitting.

Turning our attention to non-fiction literature, books such as "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offer intriguing insights into the hidden patterns that shape our world. Similarly, "Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell delves into the power of rapid cognition, shedding light on the subconscious processes that influence decision-making. In a similar vein, our study aims to unearth the hidden threads that tie together the seemingly disparate realms of historical video titles and administrative positions.

On the more whimsical side, the fictional works of "Good Omens" by Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett and "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams explore fantastical scenarios that blur the lines between the ordinary and the absurd. Much like these literary works, our investigation skews the conventional to uncover the extraordinary within the seemingly mundane.

In this era of social media ubiquity, one cannot overlook the wealth of insightful observations and musings that permeate online platforms. In a tweet that caught our attention, user @historybuff82 humorously quipped, "Who knew the fate of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma was written in the stars… or rather in the YouTube video titles?" This lighthearted remark encapsulates the essence of our research, blending unexpected connections with a sprinkle of levity.

As we traverse the landscape of scholarly inquiry and unexpected connections, one cannot help but appreciate the harmonious interplay between seriousness and silliness. In the words of a timeless dad joke, "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!" Just as atoms form the building blocks of the universe, the synergy of rigor and humor forms the cornerstone of our unconventional investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are and The number of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Evaluating the Correlation between the Insightfulness of Extra History YouTube Video Titles and the Number of Executive Administrative Assistants in Oklahoma: A Serious Study with a Silly Twist"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an unconventional investigation into the potential connection between the intriguingly crafted titles of Extra History YouTube videos and the employment trends of executive administrative assistants in the state of Oklahoma. Our research team set out to shed light on this peculiar relationship, employing AI analysis of video titles and Bureau of Labor Statistics data to investigate this lighthearted yet thought-provoking topic.

In the pursuit of academic rigor and a good laugh, our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9073295, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2022. This suggests that there may indeed be a curious relationship between the wittiness of YouTube video titles and the employment landscape for executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma.

As we delve further into the data, one might ask, "What did the YouTube video titles say to the executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma?" They may have quipped, "You're hired! We've got a 'history' of needing your 'extra' assistance."

Our paper not only contributes to the discourse on unconventional correlations but also serves as a friendly reminder that even in the seriousness of academic research, a touch of humor can go a long way in making unexpected connections. After all, who says research can't be as enjoyable as a good dad joke?

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The correlation between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a subject of interest for researchers, prompting investigations into the most unexpected pairings. Within this realm of inquiry, our study introduces an unlikely, yet intriguing, connection - the relationship between the insightfulness of YouTube video titles and the number of executive administrative assistants in the state of Oklahoma. This investigation embraces a lighthearted approach to pose a thought-provoking question: could the flair and quirkiness of Extra History YouTube video titles have an impact on the employment trends of executive administrative assistants?
Humor and seriousness often make for an effective combination. Some may say they're like peanut butter and jelly - they just go together. In the spirit of this fusion, our research seeks to explore the potential association between the witty demeanor of video titles and the professional landscape of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma. Can seemingly unrelated entities be tied together in a surprising yet cogent manner? Our findings aim to address this question with empirical rigor and a sprinkle of levity, for good measure.
At the heart of our investigation lies the intersection of data analysis and a touch of whimsy. As we unravel the connection between the captivating nature of Extra History video titles and the state's employment dynamics, we also recognize the importance of maintaining a good sense of humor throughout. Besides, what research endeavor couldn't use a little dose of levity? After all, an unexpected correlation might just be hiding behind a well-crafted pun.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigma of the potential correlation between the insightfulness of Extra History YouTube video titles and the number of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma, our research team embarked on an unconventional yet rigorous methodology, which only occasionally involved dance-off challenges between team members. First, we utilized AI-powered textual analysis to assess the levels of wit, intrigue, and punnery exhibited within the titles of a selected sample of Extra History videos. The scoring system ranged from "barely cracked a smile" to "rolled on the floor laughing," ensuring comprehensive coverage of all degrees of humor.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics' occupational employment data for the grand state of Oklahoma served as our primary source for obtaining the number of executive administrative assistants for the corresponding time period. We structured our approach in a way that could potentially be titled "The Quest for Quirk and Cubicles: Unearthing correlations between YouTube titles and occupational trends."

Through the diligent analysis of the video titles and employment data, we heaped our computational resources into an intensive data processing bunker, affectionately known as "The Pun-dit Room." This fabled chamber became the birthplace of our statistical model, where we harnessed the powers of correlation analysis and regression techniques to detect any potential kinship between the whimsical nature of video titles and the professional landscape of executive administrative assistants.

While this journey of data discovery was dotted with many late-night moments of statistical epiphany, it was not without its hazards. For instance, on one memorable occasion, an unexpected influx of puns from the video titles caused a temporary overload in the computational circuits, resulting in what our team affectionately dubbed "The Pun-gent Fiasco."

In pursuit of weathering the storm of correlations and avoiding computational malfunctions, we applied stringent measures to ensure data reliability, including cross-validation techniques and sensitivity analysis. These measures allowed us to navigate through the stormy seas of spurious correlations, guiding us toward a secure harbor of statistically robust findings.

Despite the challenges and light-hearted detours encountered along the way, our research methodology adhered to the principles of empirical rigor, computational sophistication, and just the right sprinkling of levity, after all, who can resist a good pun?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are and The number of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9073295, r-squared of 0.8232468, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Evaluating the Correlation between the Insightfulness of Extra History YouTube Video Titles and the Number of Executive Administrative Assistants in Oklahoma: A Serious Study with a Silly Twist"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an unconventional investigation into the potential connection between the intriguingly crafted titles of Extra History YouTube videos and the employment trends of executive administrative assistants in the state of Oklahoma. Our research team set out to shed light on this peculiar relationship, employing AI analysis of video titles and Bureau of Labor Statistics data to investigate this lighthearted yet thought-provoking topic.

In the pursuit of academic rigor and a good laugh, our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9073295, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2022. This suggests that there may indeed be a curious relationship between the wittiness of YouTube video titles and the employment landscape for executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma.

As we delve further into the data, one might ask, "What did the YouTube video titles say to the executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma?" They may have quipped, "You're hired! We've got a 'history' of needing your 'extra' assistance."

Our paper not only contributes to the discourse on unconventional correlations but also serves as a friendly reminder that even in the seriousness of academic research, a touch of humor can go a long way in making unexpected connections. After all, who says research can't be as enjoyable as a good dad joke?

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The correlation between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a subject of interest for researchers, prompting investigations into the most unexpected pairings. Within this realm of inquiry, our study introduces an unlikely, yet intriguing, connection - the relationship between the insightfulness of YouTube video titles and the number of executive administrative assistants in the state of Oklahoma. This investigation embraces a lighthearted approach to pose a thought-provoking question: could the flair and quirkiness of Extra History YouTube video titles have an impact on the employment trends of executive administrative assistants?
Humor and seriousness often make for an effective combination. Some may say they're like peanut butter and jelly - they just go together. In the spirit of this fusion, our research seeks to explore the potential association between the witty demeanor of video titles and the professional landscape of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma. Can seemingly unrelated entities be tied together in a surprising yet cogent manner? Our findings aim to address this question with empirical rigor and a sprinkle of levity, for good measure.
At the heart of our investigation lies the intersection of data analysis and a touch of whimsy. As we unravel the connection between the captivating nature of Extra History video titles and the state's employment dynamics, we also recognize the importance of maintaining a good sense of humor throughout. Besides, what research endeavor couldn't use a little dose of levity? After all, an unexpected correlation might just be hiding behind a well-crafted pun.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected between 2012 and 2022 unearthed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9073295 between the insightful nature of Extra History YouTube video titles and the employment figures for executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma. This correlation is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8232468, indicating that approximately 82.3% of the variation in the number of executive administrative assistants can be explained by changes in the insightfulness of the video titles. The statistical significance was confirmed with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting that the correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance.

As we marveled at the strength of this correlation, we couldn't help but wonder: did the wittiness of the YouTube video titles serve as a catalyst for the surge in employment for executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma? Perhaps the titles whispered, "It's history in the making – and you get to assist in it!"

Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot that visually exemplifies the robust relationship between the two variables, with the insightfulness of the YouTube video titles aligning closely with the fluctuations in the number of executive administrative assistants.

In summary, our findings provide tangible evidence to support the notion that the creativity and insightfulness embedded in Extra History YouTube video titles may indeed have an unexpected influence on the employment trends for executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma. This intriguing correlation not only enriches the academic discourse but also infuses a sense of merriment into the typically serious domain of quantitative analysis. After all, who knew that YouTube titles and administrative assistants could share such a pronounced connection?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are and The number of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Evaluating the Correlation between the Insightfulness of Extra History YouTube Video Titles and the Number of Executive Administrative Assistants in Oklahoma: A Serious Study with a Silly Twist"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an unconventional investigation into the potential connection between the intriguingly crafted titles of Extra History YouTube videos and the employment trends of executive administrative assistants in the state of Oklahoma. Our research team set out to shed light on this peculiar relationship, employing AI analysis of video titles and Bureau of Labor Statistics data to investigate this lighthearted yet thought-provoking topic.

In the pursuit of academic rigor and a good laugh, our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9073295, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2022. This suggests that there may indeed be a curious relationship between the wittiness of YouTube video titles and the employment landscape for executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma.

As we delve further into the data, one might ask, "What did the YouTube video titles say to the executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma?" They may have quipped, "You're hired! We've got a 'history' of needing your 'extra' assistance."

Our paper not only contributes to the discourse on unconventional correlations but also serves as a friendly reminder that even in the seriousness of academic research, a touch of humor can go a long way in making unexpected connections. After all, who says research can't be as enjoyable as a good dad joke?

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study "The Role of Video Content in the Digital Era," Smith and Doe provide a comprehensive analysis of the impact of video content on viewer engagement. The authors show a clear correlation between the quality of video titles and audience attraction, highlighting the significance of linguistic appeal in capturing attention. Similarly, Jones and Smith, in "The Psychology of Online Engagement," delve into the cognitive processes underlying user interaction with online media and emphasize the role of intriguing titles in drawing viewers.
Now, let's take a step into the unexpected as we explore the unconventional correlation between YouTube video titles and the number of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma. While this inquiry may elicit a raised eyebrow or two, our research unveils a surprising connection, much like finding a sprinkles-laden donut in a box of office supplies - completely unexpected yet oddly fitting.
Turning our attention to non-fiction literature, books such as "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offer intriguing insights into the hidden patterns that shape our world. Similarly, "Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell delves into the power of rapid cognition, shedding light on the subconscious processes that influence decision-making. In a similar vein, our study aims to unearth the hidden threads that tie together the seemingly disparate realms of historical video titles and administrative positions.
On the more whimsical side, the fictional works of "Good Omens" by Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett and "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams explore fantastical scenarios that blur the lines between the ordinary and the absurd. Much like these literary works, our investigation skews the conventional to uncover the extraordinary within the seemingly mundane.
In this era of social media ubiquity, one cannot overlook the wealth of insightful observations and musings that permeate online platforms. In a tweet that caught our attention, user @historybuff82 humorously quipped, "Who knew the fate of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma was written in the stars… or rather in the YouTube video titles?" This lighthearted remark encapsulates the essence of our research, blending unexpected connections with a sprinkle of levity.
As we traverse the landscape of scholarly inquiry and unexpected connections, one cannot help but appreciate the harmonious interplay between seriousness and silliness. In the words of a timeless dad joke, "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!" Just as atoms form the building blocks of the universe, the synergy of rigor and humor forms the cornerstone of our unconventional investigation.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected between 2012 and 2022 unearthed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9073295 between the insightful nature of Extra History YouTube video titles and the employment figures for executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma. This correlation is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8232468, indicating that approximately 82.3% of the variation in the number of executive administrative assistants can be explained by changes in the insightfulness of the video titles. The statistical significance was confirmed with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting that the correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance.
As we marveled at the strength of this correlation, we couldn't help but wonder: did the wittiness of the YouTube video titles serve as a catalyst for the surge in employment for executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma? Perhaps the titles whispered, "It's history in the making – and you get to assist in it!"
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot that visually exemplifies the robust relationship between the two variables, with the insightfulness of the YouTube video titles aligning closely with the fluctuations in the number of executive administrative assistants.
In summary, our findings provide tangible evidence to support the notion that the creativity and insightfulness embedded in Extra History YouTube video titles may indeed have an unexpected influence on the employment trends for executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma. This intriguing correlation not only enriches the academic discourse but also infuses a sense of merriment into the typically serious domain of quantitative analysis. After all, who knew that YouTube titles and administrative assistants could share such a pronounced connection?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The findings of our study unravel a curious and unexpectedly strong correlation between the insightfulness of Extra History YouTube video titles and the employment landscape for executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma. The remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9073295, along with a compelling r-squared value of 0.8232468, highlights the striking degree to which the fluctuations in the wittiness of video titles parallel the changes in the number of executive administrative assistants.

The statistically significant relationship we observed between these seemingly disparate variables raises thought-provoking questions about the underlying mechanisms at play. Did these YouTube video titles possess an almost magnetic allure that compelled organizations to expand their administrative support? It's like they say in the administrative world, "I'm all in a day's work and a pun away from wanting to file for a name change to promote my innovative 'filing' system!"

Our findings are supported by prior research, as our study follows the lead of Smith and Doe, who ascertained the impact of linguistic appeal in attracting viewers to video content. In a fashion bizarrely similar to finding a stapler in a box of donuts, our results provide empirical support for the role of intriguing titles in shaping viewer engagement, extending this impact to the domain of employment trends in a state as peculiar as Oklahoma, where you can find "extra"ordinary connections in the most unexpected places.

The presence of such a pronounced correlation undeniably adds a touch of merriment to the typically serious domain of quantitative analysis, echoing the sentiment captured in the observation of Twitter user @historybuff82. It's as if the fates themselves conspired to embed the trajectory of executive administrative assistants within the folds of YouTube video titles, underscoring the potential for levity and unexpected connections within scholarly inquiry. After all, who knew the fate of administrative positions could be sealed by a YouTube title as effectively as a dad joke seals a well-timed punchline?

Our study contributes to the scholastic examination of unconventional correlations and their implications, emphasizing the power of unexpected connections and humor in shedding light on hitherto unexplored relationships. Through our unconventional investigation, we've demonstrated that even in the realm of academic research, a touch of humor can unlock unexpected insights, much like a well-timed dad joke that leaves you pondering the unexpected connections it reveals.

In the words of a timeless dad joke, "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug!" Just as embracing mistakes may lead to unexpected pleasant surprises, our work encourages the embrace of unexpected connections to uncover new insights, all the while infusing a sense of merriment into the scholarly discourse. All in all, our findings lay the groundwork for deeper exploration of the interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena and the lighthearted joy that can be found in unearthing unexpected correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are and The number of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Evaluating the Correlation between the Insightfulness of Extra History YouTube Video Titles and the Number of Executive Administrative Assistants in Oklahoma: A Serious Study with a Silly Twist"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an unconventional investigation into the potential connection between the intriguingly crafted titles of Extra History YouTube videos and the employment trends of executive administrative assistants in the state of Oklahoma. Our research team set out to shed light on this peculiar relationship, employing AI analysis of video titles and Bureau of Labor Statistics data to investigate this lighthearted yet thought-provoking topic.

In the pursuit of academic rigor and a good laugh, our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9073295, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2022. This suggests that there may indeed be a curious relationship between the wittiness of YouTube video titles and the employment landscape for executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma.

As we delve further into the data, one might ask, "What did the YouTube video titles say to the executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma?" They may have quipped, "You're hired! We've got a 'history' of needing your 'extra' assistance."

Our paper not only contributes to the discourse on unconventional correlations but also serves as a friendly reminder that even in the seriousness of academic research, a touch of humor can go a long way in making unexpected connections. After all, who says research can't be as enjoyable as a good dad joke?

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The correlation between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a subject of interest for researchers, prompting investigations into the most unexpected pairings. Within this realm of inquiry, our study introduces an unlikely, yet intriguing, connection - the relationship between the insightfulness of YouTube video titles and the number of executive administrative assistants in the state of Oklahoma. This investigation embraces a lighthearted approach to pose a thought-provoking question: could the flair and quirkiness of Extra History YouTube video titles have an impact on the employment trends of executive administrative assistants?
Humor and seriousness often make for an effective combination. Some may say they're like peanut butter and jelly - they just go together. In the spirit of this fusion, our research seeks to explore the potential association between the witty demeanor of video titles and the professional landscape of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma. Can seemingly unrelated entities be tied together in a surprising yet cogent manner? Our findings aim to address this question with empirical rigor and a sprinkle of levity, for good measure.
At the heart of our investigation lies the intersection of data analysis and a touch of whimsy. As we unravel the connection between the captivating nature of Extra History video titles and the state's employment dynamics, we also recognize the importance of maintaining a good sense of humor throughout. Besides, what research endeavor couldn't use a little dose of levity? After all, an unexpected correlation might just be hiding behind a well-crafted pun.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected between 2012 and 2022 unearthed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9073295 between the insightful nature of Extra History YouTube video titles and the employment figures for executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma. This correlation is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8232468, indicating that approximately 82.3% of the variation in the number of executive administrative assistants can be explained by changes in the insightfulness of the video titles. The statistical significance was confirmed with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting that the correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance.
As we marveled at the strength of this correlation, we couldn't help but wonder: did the wittiness of the YouTube video titles serve as a catalyst for the surge in employment for executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma? Perhaps the titles whispered, "It's history in the making – and you get to assist in it!"
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot that visually exemplifies the robust relationship between the two variables, with the insightfulness of the YouTube video titles aligning closely with the fluctuations in the number of executive administrative assistants.
In summary, our findings provide tangible evidence to support the notion that the creativity and insightfulness embedded in Extra History YouTube video titles may indeed have an unexpected influence on the employment trends for executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma. This intriguing correlation not only enriches the academic discourse but also infuses a sense of merriment into the typically serious domain of quantitative analysis. After all, who knew that YouTube titles and administrative assistants could share such a pronounced connection?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has successfully demonstrated a notably strong and statistically significant correlation between the insightfulness of Extra History YouTube video titles and the employment figures for executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma. Our findings beg the question: could the wit and charm of these video titles be working their magic in shaping employment trends? One might imagine the titles winking at aspiring assistants, saying, "Join us on this 'extra'ordinary journey – and we promise the only history you'll be filing is in the archives!"

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9073295 and the r-squared value of 0.8232468 affirm the unexpected and quirky alignment between the captivating nature of YouTube video titles and the professional landscape of executive administrative assistants. This correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, provides compelling evidence that this uncanny connection is far from being a mere coincidence. It seems the allure of history with an 'extra' flair has not gone unnoticed by those in need of executive assistance in Oklahoma.

With Fig. 1 depicting a scatterplot mirroring the close association between these seemingly distinct variables, our findings not only challenge conventional wisdom but also celebrate the whimsical richness of unexpected correlations, much like the surprise twist in a well-crafted joke.

In light of these findings, it is evident that our study has added a touch of amusement to the realm of quantitative analysis, reminding us that research can be as enjoyable as a classic dad joke – albeit with a hint of statistical significance. We assert with confidence that further investigation in this vein may uncover more unexpectedly delightful connections, but for now, it's safe to say that the relationship between Extra History YouTube video titles and executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma has been thoroughly explored. After all, one can only handle so many correlations before needing an 'extra' break.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Evaluating the Correlation between the Insightfulness of Extra History YouTube Video Titles and the Number of Executive Administrative Assistants in Oklahoma: A Serious Study with a Silly Twist. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Interdisciplinary Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Evaluating the Correlation between the Insightfulness of Extra History YouTube Video Titles and the Number of Executive Administrative Assistants in Oklahoma: A Serious Study with a Silly Twist. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Comical Social Science Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Evaluating the Correlation between the Insightfulness of Extra History YouTube Video Titles and the Number of Executive Administrative Assistants in Oklahoma: A Serious Study with a Silly Twist with an abstract of This paper presents an unconventional investigation into the potential connection between the intriguingly crafted titles of Extra History YouTube videos and the employment trends of executive administrative assistants in the state of Oklahoma. Our research team set out to shed light on this peculiar relationship, employing AI analysis of video titles and Bureau of Labor Statistics data to investigate this lighthearted yet thought-provoking topic.
In the pursuit of academic rigor and a good laugh, our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9073295, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2022. This suggests that there may indeed be a curious relationship between the wittiness of YouTube video titles and the employment landscape for executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma.
As we delve further into the data, one might ask, "What did the YouTube video titles say to the executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma?" They may have quipped, "You're hired! We've got a 'history' of needing your 'extra' assistance."
Our paper not only contributes to the discourse on unconventional correlations but also serves as a friendly reminder that even in the seriousness of academic research, a touch of humor can go a long way in making unexpected connections. After all, who says research can't be as enjoyable as a good dad joke?

ChatGPT:

Extra History, YouTube video titles, executive administrative assistants, Oklahoma, correlation, AI analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, employment trends, unconventional correlations, academic research, humor in research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are

The number of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of executive secretaries and executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma

Correlation r = 0.9073295 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8232468 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00011. 0.0001148171676734604800000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 0.011% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 8,709 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.67, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are (Insightful score (out of 10))7.85377.85197.40487.61767.77347.67217.63417.71747.54557.48847.1133
The number of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma (Laborers)101809650799082309410933090308230734055803420




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7.8537,7.8519,7.4048,7.6176,7.7734,7.6721,7.6341,7.7174,7.5455,7.4884,7.1133,])
array_2 = np.array([10180,9650,7990,8230,9410,9330,9030,8230,7340,5580,3420,])
array_1_name = "How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "The number of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 4679 · Black Variable ID: 25782 · Red Variable ID: 18513
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0