about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,651 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin and the second variable is Electricity generation in Russia.  The chart goes from 1992 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air quality in Green Bay improved, the cheeriness of the local population skyrocketed. This led to an increase in cheese production, creating a surplus of cheese in the area. The excess cheese was then exported to Russia, where it was used to host impromptu cheese-tasting parties. These fun, dairy-centric gatherings generated so much excitement that they inadvertently sparked a series of electrifying dance-offs. As the Russians boogied the nights away, their kinetic energy was harnessed and converted into electricity, ultimately boosting electricity generation in Russia. So, in a bizarre twist, Green Bay's cleaner air indirectly contributed to a gouda time in Russia, proving that when it comes to power, the curd definitely rises to the top!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image that captures the essence of clean, vibrant Green Bay, Wisconsin, showing the bustling cheese factories with trucks carrying an abundance of cheese. Depict the cheese arriving in Russia, where it is enjoyed at impromptu tasting events that spark energetic dance-offs, resulting in the generation of electricity that lights up the cities. The image should convey the indirect connection between Green Bay's clean air and the joyful, energy-boosting party in Russia. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin and Electricity generation in Russia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Futuristic An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Charcoal Realistic Cutsy art illustration
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin and Electricity generation in Russia, in the following situation: As the air quality in Green Bay improved, the cheeriness of the local population skyrocketed. This led to an increase in cheese production, creating a surplus of cheese in the area. The excess cheese was then exported to Russia, where it was used to host impromptu cheese-tasting parties. These fun, dairy-centric gatherings generated so much excitement that they inadvertently sparked a series of electrifying dance-offs. As the Russians boogied the nights away, their kinetic energy was harnessed and converted into electricity, ultimately boosting electricity generation in Russia. So, in a bizarre twist, Green Bay's cleaner air indirectly contributed to a gouda time in Russia, proving that when it comes to power, the curd definitely rises to the top!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vibrant scene, the fresh, clean air in Green Bay, Wisconsin brings a smile to the locals' faces. Cheese factories hum with activity, yielding an excess of cheese. Trucks loaded with cheese roll out of Green Bay and voyage to Russia. Once in Russia, the cheese is lovingly sampled at impromptu tasting events, igniting spontaneous dance-offs. The energetic dancing generates electricity, lighting up the cities and boosting electricity generation in Russia. This unexpected turn of events shows that the clean air in Green Bay indirectly powered a delightful party in Russia, spreading joy and energy across the globe.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In a vibrant scene, the fresh, clean air in Green Bay, Wisconsin brings a smile to the locals' faces. Cheese factories hum with activity, yielding an excess of cheese. Trucks loaded with cheese roll out of Green Bay and voyage to Russia. Once in Russia, the cheese is lovingly sampled at impromptu tasting events, igniting spontaneous dance-offs. The energetic dancing generates electricity, lighting up the cities and boosting electricity generation in Russia. This unexpected turn of events shows that the clean air in Green Bay indirectly powered a delightful party in Russia, spreading joy and energy across the globe. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image that captures the essence of clean, vibrant Green Bay, Wisconsin, showing the bustling cheese factories with trucks carrying an abundance of cheese. Depict the cheese arriving in Russia, where it is enjoyed at impromptu tasting events that spark energetic dance-offs, resulting in the generation of electricity that lights up the cities. The image should convey the indirect connection between Green Bay's clean air and the joyful, energy-boosting party in Russia.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin caused Electricity generation in Russia to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Blowing Smoke: The Correlation Between Air Quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin and Electricity Generation in Russia

The Journal of International Energy and Environmental Dynamics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin and Electricity generation in Russia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8410101 and p < 0.01 for 1992 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing Smoke: The Correlation Between Air Quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin and Electricity Generation in Russia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the fascinating yet unexpected correlation between air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin, and electricity generation in Russia. Utilizing comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration spanning nearly three decades, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8410101 with a p-value less than 0.01. We delve into the comical conundrum of how air quality in a city famously known for its cheeseheads relates to electricity generation in a country as vast and enigmatic as Russia. The findings are a breath of fresh air in the world of statistical absurdity, shedding light on the whimsical interplay of environmental factors and global electricity dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin and Electricity generation in Russia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing Smoke: The Correlation Between Air Quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin and Electricity Generation in Russia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the fascinating yet unexpected correlation between air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin, and electricity generation in Russia. Utilizing comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration spanning nearly three decades, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8410101 with a p-value less than 0.01. We delve into the comical conundrum of how air quality in a city famously known for its cheeseheads relates to electricity generation in a country as vast and enigmatic as Russia. The findings are a breath of fresh air in the world of statistical absurdity, shedding light on the whimsical interplay of environmental factors and global electricity dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As we all know, the air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin has been the subject of much cheesiness and debate over the years. With the city's cheese factories and fervent football fandom, one might assume the air in Green Bay is filled with cheddar-scented particles and sporadic shouts of "Go Pack Go!" However, our research has uncovered an unexpected connection - the correlation between air quality in Green Bay and electricity generation in Russia. It's almost as surprising as discovering that the Frozen Tundra isn't just a nickname for Lambeau Field but also hints at the Canadian air currents that occasionally sweep through the city.

The relationship between the air we breathe in a Midwestern city and the electricity powering the vast expanse of the Motherland may seem as puzzling as deciphering a Cyrillic puzzle while eating cheese curds, but fear not! Our study has gone beyond superficial observations to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8410101, which, on a scale of statistical surprises, ranks somewhere between a midwinter Packer's win and a babushka's surprise borscht recipe. Moreover, this correlation is accompanied by a p-value that is more statistically significant than discovering a matryoshka doll within a matryoshka doll within a matryoshka doll.

In this paper, we explore the unlikely kinship between these two distant yet undeniably connected phenomena. Through the lens of environmental statistics, we seek to illuminate the enigmatic dance between cheese-scented breezes in Green Bay and the electric currents powering Russia's cities. This research promises to deliver a breath of fresh air in the world of statistical oddities, offering a glimpse into the gouda, the bad, and the ugly of environmental and global energy dynamics. So, hold onto your hats (or cheeseheads) as we embark on this quirky statistical adventure!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin and Electricity generation in Russia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing Smoke: The Correlation Between Air Quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin and Electricity Generation in Russia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the fascinating yet unexpected correlation between air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin, and electricity generation in Russia. Utilizing comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration spanning nearly three decades, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8410101 with a p-value less than 0.01. We delve into the comical conundrum of how air quality in a city famously known for its cheeseheads relates to electricity generation in a country as vast and enigmatic as Russia. The findings are a breath of fresh air in the world of statistical absurdity, shedding light on the whimsical interplay of environmental factors and global electricity dynamics.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As we all know, the air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin has been the subject of much cheesiness and debate over the years. With the city's cheese factories and fervent football fandom, one might assume the air in Green Bay is filled with cheddar-scented particles and sporadic shouts of "Go Pack Go!" However, our research has uncovered an unexpected connection - the correlation between air quality in Green Bay and electricity generation in Russia. It's almost as surprising as discovering that the Frozen Tundra isn't just a nickname for Lambeau Field but also hints at the Canadian air currents that occasionally sweep through the city.
The relationship between the air we breathe in a Midwestern city and the electricity powering the vast expanse of the Motherland may seem as puzzling as deciphering a Cyrillic puzzle while eating cheese curds, but fear not! Our study has gone beyond superficial observations to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8410101, which, on a scale of statistical surprises, ranks somewhere between a midwinter Packer's win and a babushka's surprise borscht recipe. Moreover, this correlation is accompanied by a p-value that is more statistically significant than discovering a matryoshka doll within a matryoshka doll within a matryoshka doll.
In this paper, we explore the unlikely kinship between these two distant yet undeniably connected phenomena. Through the lens of environmental statistics, we seek to illuminate the enigmatic dance between cheese-scented breezes in Green Bay and the electric currents powering Russia's cities. This research promises to deliver a breath of fresh air in the world of statistical oddities, offering a glimpse into the gouda, the bad, and the ugly of environmental and global energy dynamics. So, hold onto your hats (or cheeseheads) as we embark on this quirky statistical adventure!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "The Impact of Air Quality on Electricity Generation Trends," Smith et al. explore the relationship between air quality and electricity generation on a global scale. Their findings suggest a potential correlation between the two variables, but fail to mention anything about cheese or bears, so we're not entirely convinced. Similarly, Doe and Jones, in "Electricity and Air Quality: A Comparative Analysis," conduct a comprehensive study on the impact of electricity generation on air quality, overlooking the potential influence of Wisconsin's football fervor and Russia's endless expanse of snowy landscapes.

Turning to sources that offer a more interdisciplinary perspective, "Air Pollution and Power Plants: An Integrated Approach" by Brown and Green delves into the environmental and economic implications of air pollution from power plants. Unfortunately, their analysis lacks any mention of cheese or vodka, which are clearly vital components of any air quality study relating to Green Bay and Russia. On a lighter note, "Winds of Change: A Global Study on Air Currents and Energy" by White and Blue attempts to connect air currents with energy dynamics across the globe, but fails to capture the essence of Gouda-scented breezes or the Siberian chill.

Moving beyond strictly academic sources, "The Shock Doctrine" by Naomi Klein provides a thought-provoking exploration of the impact of economic policies on various regions, including Russia's energy sector. While the book doesn't directly address cheese or the Packers, it's essential to consider the broader geopolitical and economic context when analyzing the unlikely connection between air quality in Green Bay and electricity generation in Russia.

Fictional works such as "The Cheese Stands Alone" by Olive Cheddar and "The Electric Bear: A Russian Adventure" by P. J. Borscht offer whimsical narratives that, while not grounded in empirical evidence, capture the imagination and add a touch of humor to the otherwise serious topic of air quality and electricity generation.

And finally, in a departure from traditional research methods, the authors conducted an unorthodox literature review by analyzing a collection of CVS receipts, hoping to find a hidden code within the mundane purchases of toothpaste and cotton swabs. Alas, the only revelation was the startling number of people buying cheese-flavored snacks and furry hats, which suggests a potential connection between dairy cravings and a longing for Russian winters. While this unconventional approach may not have yielded statistically significant findings, it certainly added a touch of absurdity to the research process.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin and Electricity generation in Russia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1992 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing Smoke: The Correlation Between Air Quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin and Electricity Generation in Russia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the fascinating yet unexpected correlation between air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin, and electricity generation in Russia. Utilizing comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration spanning nearly three decades, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8410101 with a p-value less than 0.01. We delve into the comical conundrum of how air quality in a city famously known for its cheeseheads relates to electricity generation in a country as vast and enigmatic as Russia. The findings are a breath of fresh air in the world of statistical absurdity, shedding light on the whimsical interplay of environmental factors and global electricity dynamics.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As we all know, the air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin has been the subject of much cheesiness and debate over the years. With the city's cheese factories and fervent football fandom, one might assume the air in Green Bay is filled with cheddar-scented particles and sporadic shouts of "Go Pack Go!" However, our research has uncovered an unexpected connection - the correlation between air quality in Green Bay and electricity generation in Russia. It's almost as surprising as discovering that the Frozen Tundra isn't just a nickname for Lambeau Field but also hints at the Canadian air currents that occasionally sweep through the city.
The relationship between the air we breathe in a Midwestern city and the electricity powering the vast expanse of the Motherland may seem as puzzling as deciphering a Cyrillic puzzle while eating cheese curds, but fear not! Our study has gone beyond superficial observations to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8410101, which, on a scale of statistical surprises, ranks somewhere between a midwinter Packer's win and a babushka's surprise borscht recipe. Moreover, this correlation is accompanied by a p-value that is more statistically significant than discovering a matryoshka doll within a matryoshka doll within a matryoshka doll.
In this paper, we explore the unlikely kinship between these two distant yet undeniably connected phenomena. Through the lens of environmental statistics, we seek to illuminate the enigmatic dance between cheese-scented breezes in Green Bay and the electric currents powering Russia's cities. This research promises to deliver a breath of fresh air in the world of statistical oddities, offering a glimpse into the gouda, the bad, and the ugly of environmental and global energy dynamics. So, hold onto your hats (or cheeseheads) as we embark on this quirky statistical adventure!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the mysterious correlation between air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin, and electricity generation in Russia, our research team embarked on a statistical odyssey that could rival any cheese-tasting expedition. We collected a plethora of data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA), utilizing their comprehensive databases to unravel the puzzling connection between these seemingly disparate variables.

First, we combed through decades of air quality data from the EPA, spanning from 1992 to 2021, with an eagle-eyed focus on Green Bay's atmospheric composition. We meticulously scrutinized air pollutants, such as particulate matter, ozone, and sulfur dioxide, ensuring that our analysis was as thorough as a Packers fan's devotion to their team.

Simultaneously, we delved into the electrifying world of Russian electricity generation, navigating the labyrinthine corridors of the EIA's databases with the finesse of a figure skater on thin ice. We extracted data on electricity production methods, including coal, natural gas, nuclear, hydroelectric, and renewables, with the precision of a matryoshka doll craftsman assembling each intricately painted layer.

With our data in hand, we harnessed the powers of statistical software and applied the arcane arts of correlation analysis. Through rigorous computations and mind-bending matrix manipulations, we unveiled the astonishing correlation coefficient of 0.8410101, a numerical revelation that sent shockwaves through the hallowed halls of statistical analysis.

To ensure the robustness of our findings, we conducted sensitivity analyses, testing the correlation under various climatic conditions and cultural phenomena. We even briefly considered incorporating the number of cheese curds consumed in Green Bay into our model, but our lactose-tolerant colleagues convinced us to stick to more conventional variables.

In closing, our methodology hinged on the fusion of meticulous data collection, rigorous statistical analysis, and a touch of Midwestern charm. Much like the unexpected union of air quality in Green Bay and Russian electricity generation, our methodological approach embraced both the precision of statistical science and the whimsical spirit of academic exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin and Electricity generation in Russia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1992 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8410101, r-squared of 0.7072980, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing Smoke: The Correlation Between Air Quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin and Electricity Generation in Russia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the fascinating yet unexpected correlation between air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin, and electricity generation in Russia. Utilizing comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration spanning nearly three decades, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8410101 with a p-value less than 0.01. We delve into the comical conundrum of how air quality in a city famously known for its cheeseheads relates to electricity generation in a country as vast and enigmatic as Russia. The findings are a breath of fresh air in the world of statistical absurdity, shedding light on the whimsical interplay of environmental factors and global electricity dynamics.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As we all know, the air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin has been the subject of much cheesiness and debate over the years. With the city's cheese factories and fervent football fandom, one might assume the air in Green Bay is filled with cheddar-scented particles and sporadic shouts of "Go Pack Go!" However, our research has uncovered an unexpected connection - the correlation between air quality in Green Bay and electricity generation in Russia. It's almost as surprising as discovering that the Frozen Tundra isn't just a nickname for Lambeau Field but also hints at the Canadian air currents that occasionally sweep through the city.
The relationship between the air we breathe in a Midwestern city and the electricity powering the vast expanse of the Motherland may seem as puzzling as deciphering a Cyrillic puzzle while eating cheese curds, but fear not! Our study has gone beyond superficial observations to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8410101, which, on a scale of statistical surprises, ranks somewhere between a midwinter Packer's win and a babushka's surprise borscht recipe. Moreover, this correlation is accompanied by a p-value that is more statistically significant than discovering a matryoshka doll within a matryoshka doll within a matryoshka doll.
In this paper, we explore the unlikely kinship between these two distant yet undeniably connected phenomena. Through the lens of environmental statistics, we seek to illuminate the enigmatic dance between cheese-scented breezes in Green Bay and the electric currents powering Russia's cities. This research promises to deliver a breath of fresh air in the world of statistical oddities, offering a glimpse into the gouda, the bad, and the ugly of environmental and global energy dynamics. So, hold onto your hats (or cheeseheads) as we embark on this quirky statistical adventure!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a surprising and robust correlation between air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin, and electricity generation in Russia. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8410101, our findings served as a breath of fresh air in the world of statistical absurdity, reminding us that truth is often stranger than fiction, particularly in the realm of data analysis.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts this unexpectedly strong association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the data points themselves decided to trade their stereotypes - the cheese-loving curds of Green Bay mingling with the electrical currents of the vast Russian landscape, creating a statistical ballet that would make even Tchaikovsky envious.

Moreover, the correlation's r-squared value of 0.7072980 indicated that a substantial portion - roughly 70.7% - of the variability in air quality in Green Bay could be explained by electricity generation in Russia. This finding is as striking as discovering a perfectly symmetrical matryoshka doll set or a perfectly executed Lambeau Leap.

The p-value less than 0.01 further solidified the robustness of this connection, akin to finding a perfectly aged block of cheese at the back of your refrigerator. It was clear that this correlation was not just a statistical artifact, but a genuine and substantial relationship that defied conventional wisdom.

In summary, our research has triumphantly unveiled the surprising connection between air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin, and electricity generation in Russia, reminding us once again that the world of statistical analysis is full of delightful surprises and hidden patterns, much like finding a pearl in an oyster or a perfectly thrown touchdown pass in a Green Bay blizzard.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin and Electricity generation in Russia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Blowing Smoke: The Correlation Between Air Quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin and Electricity Generation in Russia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the fascinating yet unexpected correlation between air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin, and electricity generation in Russia. Utilizing comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration spanning nearly three decades, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8410101 with a p-value less than 0.01. We delve into the comical conundrum of how air quality in a city famously known for its cheeseheads relates to electricity generation in a country as vast and enigmatic as Russia. The findings are a breath of fresh air in the world of statistical absurdity, shedding light on the whimsical interplay of environmental factors and global electricity dynamics.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Impact of Air Quality on Electricity Generation Trends," Smith et al. explore the relationship between air quality and electricity generation on a global scale. Their findings suggest a potential correlation between the two variables, but fail to mention anything about cheese or bears, so we're not entirely convinced. Similarly, Doe and Jones, in "Electricity and Air Quality: A Comparative Analysis," conduct a comprehensive study on the impact of electricity generation on air quality, overlooking the potential influence of Wisconsin's football fervor and Russia's endless expanse of snowy landscapes.
Turning to sources that offer a more interdisciplinary perspective, "Air Pollution and Power Plants: An Integrated Approach" by Brown and Green delves into the environmental and economic implications of air pollution from power plants. Unfortunately, their analysis lacks any mention of cheese or vodka, which are clearly vital components of any air quality study relating to Green Bay and Russia. On a lighter note, "Winds of Change: A Global Study on Air Currents and Energy" by White and Blue attempts to connect air currents with energy dynamics across the globe, but fails to capture the essence of Gouda-scented breezes or the Siberian chill.
Moving beyond strictly academic sources, "The Shock Doctrine" by Naomi Klein provides a thought-provoking exploration of the impact of economic policies on various regions, including Russia's energy sector. While the book doesn't directly address cheese or the Packers, it's essential to consider the broader geopolitical and economic context when analyzing the unlikely connection between air quality in Green Bay and electricity generation in Russia.
Fictional works such as "The Cheese Stands Alone" by Olive Cheddar and "The Electric Bear: A Russian Adventure" by P. J. Borscht offer whimsical narratives that, while not grounded in empirical evidence, capture the imagination and add a touch of humor to the otherwise serious topic of air quality and electricity generation.
And finally, in a departure from traditional research methods, the authors conducted an unorthodox literature review by analyzing a collection of CVS receipts, hoping to find a hidden code within the mundane purchases of toothpaste and cotton swabs. Alas, the only revelation was the startling number of people buying cheese-flavored snacks and furry hats, which suggests a potential connection between dairy cravings and a longing for Russian winters. While this unconventional approach may not have yielded statistically significant findings, it certainly added a touch of absurdity to the research process.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a surprising and robust correlation between air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin, and electricity generation in Russia. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8410101, our findings served as a breath of fresh air in the world of statistical absurdity, reminding us that truth is often stranger than fiction, particularly in the realm of data analysis.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts this unexpectedly strong association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the data points themselves decided to trade their stereotypes - the cheese-loving curds of Green Bay mingling with the electrical currents of the vast Russian landscape, creating a statistical ballet that would make even Tchaikovsky envious.
Moreover, the correlation's r-squared value of 0.7072980 indicated that a substantial portion - roughly 70.7% - of the variability in air quality in Green Bay could be explained by electricity generation in Russia. This finding is as striking as discovering a perfectly symmetrical matryoshka doll set or a perfectly executed Lambeau Leap.
The p-value less than 0.01 further solidified the robustness of this connection, akin to finding a perfectly aged block of cheese at the back of your refrigerator. It was clear that this correlation was not just a statistical artifact, but a genuine and substantial relationship that defied conventional wisdom.
In summary, our research has triumphantly unveiled the surprising connection between air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin, and electricity generation in Russia, reminding us once again that the world of statistical analysis is full of delightful surprises and hidden patterns, much like finding a pearl in an oyster or a perfectly thrown touchdown pass in a Green Bay blizzard.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The correlation between air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin, and electricity generation in Russia is as delightful as finding a Wisconsinite's secret stash of cheese curds. Our findings not only align with previous research on the impact of air quality on electricity generation but also lend a whimsical twist to the otherwise serious discourse in this field.

Our study supported Smith et al.'s work, highlighting the potential link between air quality and electricity generation trends. However, we delved deeper by uncovering the unexpected influence of Wisconsin's cheese on Russian energy dynamics. Similarly, our results reinforced Doe and Jones' comparative analysis but added the missing piece of the puzzle by considering the overlooked impact of Wisconsin's football fervor and Russia's snowy landscapes.

In a comical yet crucial manner, our findings also expanded on Brown and Green's environmental implications of air pollution from power plants, emphasizing the undeniably vital role of cheese and vodka in any study related to Green Bay and Russia. Additionally, our results aligned with White and Blue's global study on air currents, shedding light on the Gouda-scented breezes and Siberian chill that might have played a part in this peculiar correlation.

Our unorthodox literature review, including the analysis of CVS receipts, may not have yielded statistically significant findings, but it certainly added a touch of absurdity to the research process. As our results demonstrated, statistical absurdity can lead to astonishing revelations, much like finding a hidden code within a mundane purchase or unraveling the mysterious connection between dairy cravings and a longing for Russian winters.

The robust correlation coefficient, r-squared value, and p-value less than 0.01 in our analysis reaffirmed that the statistical ballet between cheese-loving curds and electrical currents was not just a coincidence, but rather a whimsical yet genuine connection. It was as if the data points themselves decided to trade their stereotypes, echoing the unlikely harmony between two vastly different regions that was captured in our scatterplot.

In conclusion, our research not only contributes to the understanding of the interplay between air quality and electricity generation but also adds a whimsical dimension to the discourse, reminding us that statistical absurdity can lead to profound and unexpected discoveries, much like stumbling upon a trove of hidden Russian treasures in the Packers' end zone.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin and Electricity generation in Russia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing Smoke: The Correlation Between Air Quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin and Electricity Generation in Russia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the fascinating yet unexpected correlation between air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin, and electricity generation in Russia. Utilizing comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration spanning nearly three decades, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8410101 with a p-value less than 0.01. We delve into the comical conundrum of how air quality in a city famously known for its cheeseheads relates to electricity generation in a country as vast and enigmatic as Russia. The findings are a breath of fresh air in the world of statistical absurdity, shedding light on the whimsical interplay of environmental factors and global electricity dynamics.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As we all know, the air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin has been the subject of much cheesiness and debate over the years. With the city's cheese factories and fervent football fandom, one might assume the air in Green Bay is filled with cheddar-scented particles and sporadic shouts of "Go Pack Go!" However, our research has uncovered an unexpected connection - the correlation between air quality in Green Bay and electricity generation in Russia. It's almost as surprising as discovering that the Frozen Tundra isn't just a nickname for Lambeau Field but also hints at the Canadian air currents that occasionally sweep through the city.
The relationship between the air we breathe in a Midwestern city and the electricity powering the vast expanse of the Motherland may seem as puzzling as deciphering a Cyrillic puzzle while eating cheese curds, but fear not! Our study has gone beyond superficial observations to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8410101, which, on a scale of statistical surprises, ranks somewhere between a midwinter Packer's win and a babushka's surprise borscht recipe. Moreover, this correlation is accompanied by a p-value that is more statistically significant than discovering a matryoshka doll within a matryoshka doll within a matryoshka doll.
In this paper, we explore the unlikely kinship between these two distant yet undeniably connected phenomena. Through the lens of environmental statistics, we seek to illuminate the enigmatic dance between cheese-scented breezes in Green Bay and the electric currents powering Russia's cities. This research promises to deliver a breath of fresh air in the world of statistical oddities, offering a glimpse into the gouda, the bad, and the ugly of environmental and global energy dynamics. So, hold onto your hats (or cheeseheads) as we embark on this quirky statistical adventure!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a surprising and robust correlation between air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin, and electricity generation in Russia. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8410101, our findings served as a breath of fresh air in the world of statistical absurdity, reminding us that truth is often stranger than fiction, particularly in the realm of data analysis.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts this unexpectedly strong association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the data points themselves decided to trade their stereotypes - the cheese-loving curds of Green Bay mingling with the electrical currents of the vast Russian landscape, creating a statistical ballet that would make even Tchaikovsky envious.
Moreover, the correlation's r-squared value of 0.7072980 indicated that a substantial portion - roughly 70.7% - of the variability in air quality in Green Bay could be explained by electricity generation in Russia. This finding is as striking as discovering a perfectly symmetrical matryoshka doll set or a perfectly executed Lambeau Leap.
The p-value less than 0.01 further solidified the robustness of this connection, akin to finding a perfectly aged block of cheese at the back of your refrigerator. It was clear that this correlation was not just a statistical artifact, but a genuine and substantial relationship that defied conventional wisdom.
In summary, our research has triumphantly unveiled the surprising connection between air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin, and electricity generation in Russia, reminding us once again that the world of statistical analysis is full of delightful surprises and hidden patterns, much like finding a pearl in an oyster or a perfectly thrown touchdown pass in a Green Bay blizzard.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has uncovered a remarkable correlation between air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin and electricity generation in Russia. The findings of this study have added a breath of fresh air to the field of environmental statistics, demonstrating that even the most seemingly unrelated variables can have a curiously close relationship. The statistical significance of our findings is as clear as the crisp Wisconsin air, and the robust correlation coefficient of 0.8410101 serves as a beacon of statistical marvel in the world of data analysis.

The unexpected kinship between these two distinct phenomena is akin to stumbling upon a hidden compartment in a matryoshka doll – it's an intriguing discovery that prompts further investigation. However, much like the elusive quest to find the world's cheesiest cheese, our work here is done. No more research is needed in this area – we've already unearthed a statistical match that's as delightful as discovering a babushka's secret pickle recipe. So, let's savor this cheesy victory and bask in the glow of statistical absurdity, knowing that the air in Green Bay and the electricity in Russia share a whimsical dance that defies conventional logic.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Blowing Smoke: The Correlation Between Air Quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin and Electricity Generation in Russia. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of International Energy and Environmental Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Blowing Smoke: The Correlation Between Air Quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin and Electricity Generation in Russia. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Environmental Equilibrium and International Energy Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Blowing Smoke: The Correlation Between Air Quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin and Electricity Generation in Russia with an abstract of This paper investigates the fascinating yet unexpected correlation between air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin, and electricity generation in Russia. Utilizing comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration spanning nearly three decades, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8410101 with a p-value less than 0.01. We delve into the comical conundrum of how air quality in a city famously known for its cheeseheads relates to electricity generation in a country as vast and enigmatic as Russia. The findings are a breath of fresh air in the world of statistical absurdity, shedding light on the whimsical interplay of environmental factors and global electricity dynamics.

ChatGPT:

"air quality Green Bay Wisconsin," "electricity generation Russia correlation," "Environmental Protection Agency data," "Energy Information Administration data," "air pollution statistical analysis," "environmental factors electricity generation," "global electricity dynamics," "correlation coefficient air quality electricity generation," "comical conundrum air quality electricity generation"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with good or moderate air quality in Green Bay, WI
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin

Electricity generation in Russia
Detailed data title: Total electricity generation in Russia in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Electricity generation in Russia

Correlation r = 0.8410101 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7072980 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 70.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Electricity generation in Russia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin) over the 30 years from 1992 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.9E-9. 0.0000000059406374220033410000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.84 in 5.9E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 168,332,105 random variables You don't actually need 168 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 29 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 29 because we have two variables measured over a period of 30 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.69, 0.92 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin (Good air quality)95.794497.536991.803387.590.163991.847888.043590.243996.774292.653192.213194.537897.254990.079495.951494.101197.727396.675996.629297.802295.08299.452199.178199.171398.633999.444498.333310099.726898.6301
Electricity generation in Russia (Billion kWh)965.246914.255807.727815.158804.127793.875786.491798.773832.944842.446846.084868.008885.454901.022941.651960.147984.171939.516982.562998.4751013.951003.591007.451010.031033.161036.281046.841062.871044.281109.69




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([95.7944,97.5369,91.8033,87.5,90.1639,91.8478,88.0435,90.2439,96.7742,92.6531,92.2131,94.5378,97.2549,90.0794,95.9514,94.1011,97.7273,96.6759,96.6292,97.8022,95.082,99.4521,99.1781,99.1713,98.6339,99.4444,98.3333,100,99.7268,98.6301,])
array_2 = np.array([965.246,914.255,807.727,815.158,804.127,793.875,786.491,798.773,832.944,842.446,846.084,868.008,885.454,901.022,941.651,960.147,984.171,939.516,982.562,998.475,1013.95,1003.59,1007.45,1010.03,1033.16,1036.28,1046.84,1062.87,1044.28,1109.69,])
array_1_name = "Air quality in Green Bay, Wisconsin"
array_2_name = "Electricity generation in Russia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 4651 · Black Variable ID: 20688 · Red Variable ID: 23918
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0