about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,624 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Libertarian Senators in Kansas and the second variable is Google searches for 'two day shipping'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more Libertarian Senators were elected in Kansas, they advocated for less government regulation. This led to a significant deregulation of the shipping industry, allowing for more efficient and speedy delivery options. It's as if they said, "Let's deliver freedom and free markets, pronto!" The increase in competition and innovation among shipping companies ultimately made two day shipping more widely available, much to the delight of online shoppers everywhere.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Creating the scene you've described, we could generate an image with a bustling cityscape set against the backdrop of a bright and clear day. The focus would be on a series of efficient and modern warehouses and ports, where we see various shipping activities taking place. The city streets would be filled with people going about their business, showcasing the lively and optimistic atmosphere. The image would aim to capture the sense of progress and innovation that has come to define the city and its shipping industry, all relayed through the bustling activity and efficient operations in the visual. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two day shipping'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image A TIME magazine cover image Low poly A Discovery magazine cover image Scalar art
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two day shipping', in the following situation: As more Libertarian Senators were elected in Kansas, they advocated for less government regulation. This led to a significant deregulation of the shipping industry, allowing for more efficient and speedy delivery options. It's as if they said, "Let's deliver freedom and free markets, pronto!" The increase in competition and innovation among shipping companies ultimately made two day shipping more widely available, much to the delight of online shoppers everywhere.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling city in Kansas, a group of people were seen casting their ballots for Libertarian Senators, eager for change and less government regulation. As the Senators took their seats, they wasted no time in advocating for a significant deregulation of the shipping industry. The once bustling ports and warehouses now gleamed with efficiency and speed, as the competition among shipping companies soared. Meanwhile, across town, online shoppers cheered as they easily found 'two day shipping' options for their purchases, thanks to the newfound freedom and innovation in the shipping industry.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling city in Kansas, a group of people were seen casting their ballots for Libertarian Senators, eager for change and less government regulation. As the Senators took their seats, they wasted no time in advocating for a significant deregulation of the shipping industry. The once bustling ports and warehouses now gleamed with efficiency and speed, as the competition among shipping companies soared. Meanwhile, across town, online shoppers cheered as they easily found 'two day shipping' options for their purchases, thanks to the newfound freedom and innovation in the shipping industry. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Creating the scene you've described, we could generate an image with a bustling cityscape set against the backdrop of a bright and clear day. The focus would be on a series of efficient and modern warehouses and ports, where we see various shipping activities taking place. The city streets would be filled with people going about their business, showcasing the lively and optimistic atmosphere. The image would aim to capture the sense of progress and innovation that has come to define the city and its shipping industry, all relayed through the bustling activity and efficient operations in the visual.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas caused two day shipping (Google searches for 'two day shipping') to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Libertarian Votes and Google Quotes: The Great Debate on Two-Day Shipping in Kansas State Senatorial Elections

The Journal of Political Quirks

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two day shipping'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9875251 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Libertarian Votes and Google Quotes: The Great Debate on Two-Day Shipping in Kansas State Senatorial Elections

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the intriguing findings of the relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two-day shipping'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends, our research team uncovered a puzzling connection between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Despite the improbable nature of the relationship, our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9875251 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2020. Our study contributes to the colorful tapestry of political and consumer behavior research, and is sure to leave readers pondering the peculiar mysteries of human interest and choice.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two day shipping'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Libertarian Votes and Google Quotes: The Great Debate on Two-Day Shipping in Kansas State Senatorial Elections

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the intriguing findings of the relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two-day shipping'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends, our research team uncovered a puzzling connection between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Despite the improbable nature of the relationship, our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9875251 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2020. Our study contributes to the colorful tapestry of political and consumer behavior research, and is sure to leave readers pondering the peculiar mysteries of human interest and choice.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of politics and consumer behavior has always been a fascinating realm for researchers, full of twists and quirky findings that leave us scratching our heads. In the United States, where the political landscape is sprinkled with a variety of ideologies and preferences, it’s no wonder that unexpected connections crop up from time to time.

In the heartland of America, the great state of Kansas is no stranger to the colorful dance of political preferences. With winds sweeping over amber waves of grain and the perennial debate over sunflowers versus wheat, Kansans have shown a knack for keeping us on our toes.

Likewise, the ever-evolving world of e-commerce and consumer habits has woven itself into the fabric of daily life, leaving us with an array of mind-boggling correlations and peculiar patterns. Who would have thought that the clickety-clack of keyboards and the allure of two-day shipping could have any bearing on the ballot boxes in the Sunflower State?

Drawing upon data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team set out to unravel the mysterious link between Libertarian votes for Kansas Senators and Google searches for the elusive promise of two-day shipping. What we unearthed left us both perplexed and amused, prompting further examination and a raised eyebrow or two.

In this paper, we take you on a journey through the curious corridors of Kansas politics and the captivating world of online shopping, pausing to ponder the peculiar interplay between the two. Our findings not only contribute to the colorful tapestry of political and consumer behavior research but also serve as a testament to the endlessly surprising nature of human interest and choice.

So, buckle up and prepare for a bumpy yet entertaining ride through the heartland and the digital realm, where the unexpected becomes the ordinary, and the ordinary becomes the subject of academic fascination.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two day shipping'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Libertarian Votes and Google Quotes: The Great Debate on Two-Day Shipping in Kansas State Senatorial Elections

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the intriguing findings of the relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two-day shipping'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends, our research team uncovered a puzzling connection between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Despite the improbable nature of the relationship, our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9875251 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2020. Our study contributes to the colorful tapestry of political and consumer behavior research, and is sure to leave readers pondering the peculiar mysteries of human interest and choice.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of politics and consumer behavior has always been a fascinating realm for researchers, full of twists and quirky findings that leave us scratching our heads. In the United States, where the political landscape is sprinkled with a variety of ideologies and preferences, it’s no wonder that unexpected connections crop up from time to time.
In the heartland of America, the great state of Kansas is no stranger to the colorful dance of political preferences. With winds sweeping over amber waves of grain and the perennial debate over sunflowers versus wheat, Kansans have shown a knack for keeping us on our toes.
Likewise, the ever-evolving world of e-commerce and consumer habits has woven itself into the fabric of daily life, leaving us with an array of mind-boggling correlations and peculiar patterns. Who would have thought that the clickety-clack of keyboards and the allure of two-day shipping could have any bearing on the ballot boxes in the Sunflower State?
Drawing upon data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team set out to unravel the mysterious link between Libertarian votes for Kansas Senators and Google searches for the elusive promise of two-day shipping. What we unearthed left us both perplexed and amused, prompting further examination and a raised eyebrow or two.
In this paper, we take you on a journey through the curious corridors of Kansas politics and the captivating world of online shopping, pausing to ponder the peculiar interplay between the two. Our findings not only contribute to the colorful tapestry of political and consumer behavior research but also serve as a testament to the endlessly surprising nature of human interest and choice.
So, buckle up and prepare for a bumpy yet entertaining ride through the heartland and the digital realm, where the unexpected becomes the ordinary, and the ordinary becomes the subject of academic fascination.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The study of peculiar correlations and unexpected relationships has long intrigued researchers, as evidenced by the works of Smith, Doe, and Jones in their respective investigations into seemingly unrelated phenomena. In "The Unlikely Connections between Political Affiliation and Consumer Behavior," Smith delves into the intricate web of human choices and interests, shedding light on the surprising interactions that shape our daily lives. Similarly, Doe's exploration of "Consumer Behavior and Voting Patterns" offers a comprehensive examination of the curious interplay between marketplace preferences and political inclinations, paving the way for a deeper understanding of the human psyche. Meanwhile, Jones' "Odd Couples: Unconventional Correlations in Social Sciences" takes a whimsical yet insightful approach to uncovering the unexpected links that permeate our societal landscape.

Turning to more specialized works, "The Economics of Expedited Delivery" by Harvey and Winston provides a rigorous economic analysis of the factors influencing consumer demand for swift shipping options. Their meticulous dissection of the market forces at play offers valuable insights into the sway of convenience and immediacy in shaping purchasing decisions. Moreover, "The Politics of the Prairie" by Jenkins offers a comprehensive overview of Kansas' political history and the intricacies of ideological dynamics within the state, setting the stage for a nuanced exploration of the interwoven fabric of political preference and regional identity.

As we venture further into the realm of literature, the works of fiction offer intriguing narratives that mirror the enigmatic nature of our findings. "The Curious Case of Liberty and Lightning-Fast Deliveries" by A. Author presents a whimsical tale of political intrigue and expedited shipping in the heartland, captivating readers with its blend of electoral drama and e-commerce escapades. Additionally, "Sunflower Shenanigans" by L. Novelist weaves a lighthearted yarn of internet searches and political peculiarities, embracing the quirks of human behavior with a delightful touch of whimsy.

In the digital domain, popular internet memes such as "Two-Day Shipping: Expectation vs. Reality" reflect the widespread fascination with the elusive promise of swift deliveries, resonating with consumers and netizens alike. The humorous juxtaposition of expectations and actual experiences in online shopping serves as a playful reminder of the captivating allure of expedited shipping options.

While the scholarly landscape may appear serious and somber, the whimsical dance of unexpected correlations continues to enchant and beguile. Our foray into the intriguing juncture of Libertarian votes for Kansas Senators and Google searches for 'two-day shipping' promises a delightful blend of academic rigor and light-hearted astonishment, inviting readers to partake in the joyful curiosity that defines our academic pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two day shipping'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Libertarian Votes and Google Quotes: The Great Debate on Two-Day Shipping in Kansas State Senatorial Elections

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the intriguing findings of the relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two-day shipping'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends, our research team uncovered a puzzling connection between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Despite the improbable nature of the relationship, our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9875251 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2020. Our study contributes to the colorful tapestry of political and consumer behavior research, and is sure to leave readers pondering the peculiar mysteries of human interest and choice.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of politics and consumer behavior has always been a fascinating realm for researchers, full of twists and quirky findings that leave us scratching our heads. In the United States, where the political landscape is sprinkled with a variety of ideologies and preferences, it’s no wonder that unexpected connections crop up from time to time.
In the heartland of America, the great state of Kansas is no stranger to the colorful dance of political preferences. With winds sweeping over amber waves of grain and the perennial debate over sunflowers versus wheat, Kansans have shown a knack for keeping us on our toes.
Likewise, the ever-evolving world of e-commerce and consumer habits has woven itself into the fabric of daily life, leaving us with an array of mind-boggling correlations and peculiar patterns. Who would have thought that the clickety-clack of keyboards and the allure of two-day shipping could have any bearing on the ballot boxes in the Sunflower State?
Drawing upon data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team set out to unravel the mysterious link between Libertarian votes for Kansas Senators and Google searches for the elusive promise of two-day shipping. What we unearthed left us both perplexed and amused, prompting further examination and a raised eyebrow or two.
In this paper, we take you on a journey through the curious corridors of Kansas politics and the captivating world of online shopping, pausing to ponder the peculiar interplay between the two. Our findings not only contribute to the colorful tapestry of political and consumer behavior research but also serve as a testament to the endlessly surprising nature of human interest and choice.
So, buckle up and prepare for a bumpy yet entertaining ride through the heartland and the digital realm, where the unexpected becomes the ordinary, and the ordinary becomes the subject of academic fascination.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To begin our investigation into the peculiar marriage of Libertarian votes and Google searches for 'two-day shipping' in Kansas State Senatorial Elections, our research team embarked on a convoluted journey through the digital archives of MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends. We sifted through the virtual haystack of data, seeking not just needles, but the enigmatic connections that lay hidden within.

Our first step involved obtaining the complete historical records of Libertarian votes for Kansas Senators from 2004 to 2020. With these numbers in hand, we descended into the depths of Google Trends like intrepid spelunkers, mining the data for the search interest in 'two-day shipping' within the confines of the Sunflower State.

Having gathered these disparate pieces of the puzzle, we unleashed the full power of statistical analysis. We utilized t-tests, linear regressions, and correlation coefficients to scrutinize the relationship between Libertarian votes and the e-commerce siren call of expedited shipping. Our journey through the digits and decimals was as perilous as it was enlightening, as we navigated the tumultuous seas of data to arrive at our perplexing but undeniably robust findings.

To ensure the reliability of our results, we subjected our methodological approach to rigorous scrutiny, like a referee double-checking a game-winning shot in the final seconds. Our data collection process underwent meticulous validation, akin to inspecting fine china for imperfections. This rigorous approach fortified the solid foundation upon which our unusual yet compelling conclusions stand.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two day shipping'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9875251, r-squared of 0.9752059, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Libertarian Votes and Google Quotes: The Great Debate on Two-Day Shipping in Kansas State Senatorial Elections

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the intriguing findings of the relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two-day shipping'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends, our research team uncovered a puzzling connection between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Despite the improbable nature of the relationship, our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9875251 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2020. Our study contributes to the colorful tapestry of political and consumer behavior research, and is sure to leave readers pondering the peculiar mysteries of human interest and choice.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of politics and consumer behavior has always been a fascinating realm for researchers, full of twists and quirky findings that leave us scratching our heads. In the United States, where the political landscape is sprinkled with a variety of ideologies and preferences, it’s no wonder that unexpected connections crop up from time to time.
In the heartland of America, the great state of Kansas is no stranger to the colorful dance of political preferences. With winds sweeping over amber waves of grain and the perennial debate over sunflowers versus wheat, Kansans have shown a knack for keeping us on our toes.
Likewise, the ever-evolving world of e-commerce and consumer habits has woven itself into the fabric of daily life, leaving us with an array of mind-boggling correlations and peculiar patterns. Who would have thought that the clickety-clack of keyboards and the allure of two-day shipping could have any bearing on the ballot boxes in the Sunflower State?
Drawing upon data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team set out to unravel the mysterious link between Libertarian votes for Kansas Senators and Google searches for the elusive promise of two-day shipping. What we unearthed left us both perplexed and amused, prompting further examination and a raised eyebrow or two.
In this paper, we take you on a journey through the curious corridors of Kansas politics and the captivating world of online shopping, pausing to ponder the peculiar interplay between the two. Our findings not only contribute to the colorful tapestry of political and consumer behavior research but also serve as a testament to the endlessly surprising nature of human interest and choice.
So, buckle up and prepare for a bumpy yet entertaining ride through the heartland and the digital realm, where the unexpected becomes the ordinary, and the ordinary becomes the subject of academic fascination.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a striking relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two-day shipping'. Despite the apparent disconnect between political leanings and online shopping preferences, we found a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9875251, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared of 0.9752059, implying that approximately 97.5% of the variability in Libertarian votes can be explained by the variation in Google searches for 'two-day shipping'. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship between these phenomena, further cementing the robustness of our findings.

The scatterplot in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the tight bond between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two-day shipping', leaving little room for doubt about the strength of their connection. It is quite remarkable to witness the convergence of seemingly disparate domains into a coherent pattern of association, akin to finding a kernel of truth in a haystack of data. This unexpected finding serves as a reminder of the intriguing mysteries that often lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated societal phenomena, inviting further exploration and contemplation.

The implications of these findings extend beyond the realms of political and consumer behavior research, delving into the quirky and whimsical nature of human interests and choices. It is as if we have stumbled upon a treasure trove of perplexing connections, giving credence to the notion that reality is often stranger than fiction. This revelation certainly adds a colorful stroke to the canvas of academic inquiry, enriching our understanding of the multifaceted intricacies that underpin human society.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the intriguing dance between politics and consumer behavior, underscoring the unexpected link between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two-day shipping'. The unforeseen intertwining of these seemingly unrelated variables underscores the whimsical and puzzling nature of human activities, leaving researchers and readers alike in delightful bewilderment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two day shipping'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Libertarian Votes and Google Quotes: The Great Debate on Two-Day Shipping in Kansas State Senatorial Elections

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the intriguing findings of the relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two-day shipping'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends, our research team uncovered a puzzling connection between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Despite the improbable nature of the relationship, our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9875251 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2020. Our study contributes to the colorful tapestry of political and consumer behavior research, and is sure to leave readers pondering the peculiar mysteries of human interest and choice.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The study of peculiar correlations and unexpected relationships has long intrigued researchers, as evidenced by the works of Smith, Doe, and Jones in their respective investigations into seemingly unrelated phenomena. In "The Unlikely Connections between Political Affiliation and Consumer Behavior," Smith delves into the intricate web of human choices and interests, shedding light on the surprising interactions that shape our daily lives. Similarly, Doe's exploration of "Consumer Behavior and Voting Patterns" offers a comprehensive examination of the curious interplay between marketplace preferences and political inclinations, paving the way for a deeper understanding of the human psyche. Meanwhile, Jones' "Odd Couples: Unconventional Correlations in Social Sciences" takes a whimsical yet insightful approach to uncovering the unexpected links that permeate our societal landscape.
Turning to more specialized works, "The Economics of Expedited Delivery" by Harvey and Winston provides a rigorous economic analysis of the factors influencing consumer demand for swift shipping options. Their meticulous dissection of the market forces at play offers valuable insights into the sway of convenience and immediacy in shaping purchasing decisions. Moreover, "The Politics of the Prairie" by Jenkins offers a comprehensive overview of Kansas' political history and the intricacies of ideological dynamics within the state, setting the stage for a nuanced exploration of the interwoven fabric of political preference and regional identity.

As we venture further into the realm of literature, the works of fiction offer intriguing narratives that mirror the enigmatic nature of our findings. "The Curious Case of Liberty and Lightning-Fast Deliveries" by A. Author presents a whimsical tale of political intrigue and expedited shipping in the heartland, captivating readers with its blend of electoral drama and e-commerce escapades. Additionally, "Sunflower Shenanigans" by L. Novelist weaves a lighthearted yarn of internet searches and political peculiarities, embracing the quirks of human behavior with a delightful touch of whimsy.

In the digital domain, popular internet memes such as "Two-Day Shipping: Expectation vs. Reality" reflect the widespread fascination with the elusive promise of swift deliveries, resonating with consumers and netizens alike. The humorous juxtaposition of expectations and actual experiences in online shopping serves as a playful reminder of the captivating allure of expedited shipping options.

While the scholarly landscape may appear serious and somber, the whimsical dance of unexpected correlations continues to enchant and beguile. Our foray into the intriguing juncture of Libertarian votes for Kansas Senators and Google searches for 'two-day shipping' promises a delightful blend of academic rigor and light-hearted astonishment, inviting readers to partake in the joyful curiosity that defines our academic pursuits.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a striking relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two-day shipping'. Despite the apparent disconnect between political leanings and online shopping preferences, we found a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9875251, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared of 0.9752059, implying that approximately 97.5% of the variability in Libertarian votes can be explained by the variation in Google searches for 'two-day shipping'. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship between these phenomena, further cementing the robustness of our findings.
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the tight bond between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two-day shipping', leaving little room for doubt about the strength of their connection. It is quite remarkable to witness the convergence of seemingly disparate domains into a coherent pattern of association, akin to finding a kernel of truth in a haystack of data. This unexpected finding serves as a reminder of the intriguing mysteries that often lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated societal phenomena, inviting further exploration and contemplation.
The implications of these findings extend beyond the realms of political and consumer behavior research, delving into the quirky and whimsical nature of human interests and choices. It is as if we have stumbled upon a treasure trove of perplexing connections, giving credence to the notion that reality is often stranger than fiction. This revelation certainly adds a colorful stroke to the canvas of academic inquiry, enriching our understanding of the multifaceted intricacies that underpin human society.
In conclusion, our study sheds light on the intriguing dance between politics and consumer behavior, underscoring the unexpected link between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two-day shipping'. The unforeseen intertwining of these seemingly unrelated variables underscores the whimsical and puzzling nature of human activities, leaving researchers and readers alike in delightful bewilderment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The remarkable relationship uncovered in this study between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two-day shipping' provides a captivating glimpse into the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate human behaviors. Our findings align with the prior research of Smith, Doe, and Jones, who have also delved into the enigmatic web of unexpected correlations. In doing so, they have set the stage for our exploration of the unlikely nexus between political inclinations and consumer interests, embodying the scholarly tradition of blending astuteness with whimsy.

Moreover, the empirical support for the connection between these variables corroborates the playful narratives found in fiction, such as A. Author’s "The Curious Case of Liberty and Lightning-Fast Deliveries," which resonates with the surprising blend of electoral drama and e-commerce ventures revealed in our analysis. Similarly, L. Novelist’s "Sunflower Shenanigans" mirrors the amalgamation of internet searches and political peculiarities that form the crux of our findings, underscoring the woven tapestry of academic inquiry and lighthearted amusement.

The comical depiction of "Two-Day Shipping: Expectation vs. Reality" in popular internet memes takes on a new dimension of significance, reflecting the universal captivation with swift deliveries that our study has brought to the forefront. The aesthetic pleasure of receiving packages in record time seems to transcend political boundaries, encapsulating the spirit of consumer delight that underpins our observed relationship.

It is evident that our findings not only enrich the scholarly discourse but also invite an aura of delightful bewilderment. They serve as a gentle reminder of the almost whimsical aspects of human behavior and choice and compel us to marvel at the intriguing juxtaposition of Libertarian votes and internet searches, reinforcing the notion that reality is often more perplexing than fiction. Our study contributes to the spirited academic pursuit of uncovering unexpected connections, underscoring the captivating surprises that await within the depths of societal phenomena. These unexpected correlations serve to remind us of the colorful and unique nature of academic exploration, inviting further endeavors to unravel the enigmatic mysteries that define the human experience.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two day shipping'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Libertarian Votes and Google Quotes: The Great Debate on Two-Day Shipping in Kansas State Senatorial Elections

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the intriguing findings of the relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two-day shipping'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends, our research team uncovered a puzzling connection between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Despite the improbable nature of the relationship, our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9875251 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2020. Our study contributes to the colorful tapestry of political and consumer behavior research, and is sure to leave readers pondering the peculiar mysteries of human interest and choice.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of politics and consumer behavior has always been a fascinating realm for researchers, full of twists and quirky findings that leave us scratching our heads. In the United States, where the political landscape is sprinkled with a variety of ideologies and preferences, it’s no wonder that unexpected connections crop up from time to time.
In the heartland of America, the great state of Kansas is no stranger to the colorful dance of political preferences. With winds sweeping over amber waves of grain and the perennial debate over sunflowers versus wheat, Kansans have shown a knack for keeping us on our toes.
Likewise, the ever-evolving world of e-commerce and consumer habits has woven itself into the fabric of daily life, leaving us with an array of mind-boggling correlations and peculiar patterns. Who would have thought that the clickety-clack of keyboards and the allure of two-day shipping could have any bearing on the ballot boxes in the Sunflower State?
Drawing upon data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team set out to unravel the mysterious link between Libertarian votes for Kansas Senators and Google searches for the elusive promise of two-day shipping. What we unearthed left us both perplexed and amused, prompting further examination and a raised eyebrow or two.
In this paper, we take you on a journey through the curious corridors of Kansas politics and the captivating world of online shopping, pausing to ponder the peculiar interplay between the two. Our findings not only contribute to the colorful tapestry of political and consumer behavior research but also serve as a testament to the endlessly surprising nature of human interest and choice.
So, buckle up and prepare for a bumpy yet entertaining ride through the heartland and the digital realm, where the unexpected becomes the ordinary, and the ordinary becomes the subject of academic fascination.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a striking relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two-day shipping'. Despite the apparent disconnect between political leanings and online shopping preferences, we found a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9875251, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared of 0.9752059, implying that approximately 97.5% of the variability in Libertarian votes can be explained by the variation in Google searches for 'two-day shipping'. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship between these phenomena, further cementing the robustness of our findings.
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the tight bond between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two-day shipping', leaving little room for doubt about the strength of their connection. It is quite remarkable to witness the convergence of seemingly disparate domains into a coherent pattern of association, akin to finding a kernel of truth in a haystack of data. This unexpected finding serves as a reminder of the intriguing mysteries that often lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated societal phenomena, inviting further exploration and contemplation.
The implications of these findings extend beyond the realms of political and consumer behavior research, delving into the quirky and whimsical nature of human interests and choices. It is as if we have stumbled upon a treasure trove of perplexing connections, giving credence to the notion that reality is often stranger than fiction. This revelation certainly adds a colorful stroke to the canvas of academic inquiry, enriching our understanding of the multifaceted intricacies that underpin human society.
In conclusion, our study sheds light on the intriguing dance between politics and consumer behavior, underscoring the unexpected link between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two-day shipping'. The unforeseen intertwining of these seemingly unrelated variables underscores the whimsical and puzzling nature of human activities, leaving researchers and readers alike in delightful bewilderment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In unraveling the enigma of the relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two-day shipping', our study has uncovered a connection as confounding as a cat chasing a laser pointer. The remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9875251 and p < 0.01 between these seemingly unrelated phenomena has left us as befuddled as a squirrel with a Rubik's cube.

As we reflect on the peculiar findings of this research, it is akin to finding a pineapple on a pizza – surprising, maybe even contentious, but undeniably fascinating. The visual representation in Fig. 1 is reminiscent of a Jackson Pollock painting, with its intertwining splatters of Libertarian votes and 'two-day shipping' searches, forming a mosaic of the unexpected.

Our study not only peels back the layers of the onion, revealing the curious interplay between political leanings and online shopping proclivities, but it also offers a glimpse into the whimsical nature of human behavior. It is a bit like discovering a unicorn in the wild – improbable, yet undeniably captivating.

Therefore, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, unless, of course, one wishes to delve deeper into the labyrinth of human peculiarity. The stage is set, the curtains are drawn, and the audience awaits the next act in the theater of the peculiar.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Libertarian Votes and Google Quotes: The Great Debate on Two-Day Shipping in Kansas State Senatorial Elections. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Political Quirks


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Libertarian Votes and Google Quotes: The Great Debate on Two-Day Shipping in Kansas State Senatorial Elections. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Advanced Political Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Libertarian Votes and Google Quotes: The Great Debate on Two-Day Shipping in Kansas State Senatorial Elections with an abstract of This paper presents the intriguing findings of the relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'two-day shipping'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends, our research team uncovered a puzzling connection between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Despite the improbable nature of the relationship, our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9875251 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2020. Our study contributes to the colorful tapestry of political and consumer behavior research, and is sure to leave readers pondering the peculiar mysteries of human interest and choice.

ChatGPT:

Libertarian votes, Google Quotes, Kansas Senatorial Elections, two-day shipping, Libertarian votes Kansas, Google searches Kansas, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Google Trends, correlation between Libertarian votes and Google searches, political behavior research, consumer behavior research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Libertarian Senators in Kansas
Detailed data title: Percentage of votes cast for Federal Libertarian Senate candidates in Kansas
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Libertarian Senators in Kansas

Google searches for 'two day shipping'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'two day shipping' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'two day shipping'

Correlation r = 0.9875251 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9752059 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'two day shipping') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Libertarian Senators in Kansas) over the 6 years from 2004 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00023. 0.0002324632843050445000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 0.023% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 4,302 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.89, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420082010201420162020
Votes for Libertarian Senators in Kansas (Percentage of votes)1.934592.124992.139454.325725.582714.99088
Google searches for 'two day shipping' (Rel. search volume)2.416675.3333311.7538.550.083339.9167




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1.93459,2.12499,2.13945,4.32572,5.58271,4.99088,])
array_2 = np.array([2.41667,5.33333,11.75,38.5,50.0833,39.9167,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Libertarian Senators in Kansas"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'two day shipping'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 4624 · Black Variable ID: 26388 · Red Variable ID: 1357
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0