Spurious correlation #4,564 · View random
A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Cali and the second variable is Total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. The chart goes from 2007 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Cali and the second variable is Total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. The chart goes from 2007 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

Download png, svg

AI explanation

Sure! As the name Cali gained popularity, more people were drawn to the laid-back, sunny vibes associated with California. These good vibes subconsciously led them to seek out uplifting and educational content, like SmarterEveryDay videos, creating a wave of viewership. It seems the connection between Cali and cleverness is not just a mere 'coincali'dence.

^{Show image generation prompt} Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a hyper-realistic image of a graph titled "Cali" on one axis and total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos on the other. Show the name "Cali" trending upwards on the graph, paralleled by a steady rise in total views on the same axis. The background features a sun-kissed California beach with individuals visibly basking in the laid-back atmosphere, engrossed in watching educational content on various devices. This image should illustrate the intertwining trajectory of the name "Cali" and the viewership of SmarterEveryDay, hinting at a correlation potentially influenced by the sunny allure of California. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.

This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Cali and Total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Concept art Psychedelic Data cyber art Hyper-realistic 3D Pixar Style
ChatGPT: Hyper-realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Cali and Total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos, in the following situation: Sure! As the name Cali gained popularity, more people were drawn to the laid-back, sunny vibes associated with California. These good vibes subconsciously led them to seek out uplifting and educational content, like SmarterEveryDay videos, creating a wave of viewership. It seems the connection between Cali and cleverness is not just a mere 'coincali'dence.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Picture a graph with the name "Cali" on one axis and the total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos on the other. On the graph, you can see the name "Cali" trending upwards, while the total views on SmarterEveryDay videos also show a steady rise. In the background, you can visualize a sunny California beach with people enjoying the laid-back atmosphere and watching educational content on their devices. This reflects how the popularity of the name "Cali" and the views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos are on an upward trajectory, possibly influenced by the sunny vibes associated with California.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Hyper-realistic ] and depicting this scene: Picture a graph with the name "Cali" on one axis and the total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos on the other. On the graph, you can see the name "Cali" trending upwards, while the total views on SmarterEveryDay videos also show a steady rise. In the background, you can visualize a sunny California beach with people enjoying the laid-back atmosphere and watching educational content on their devices. This reflects how the popularity of the name "Cali" and the views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos are on an upward trajectory, possibly influenced by the sunny vibes associated with California. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a hyper-realistic image of a graph titled "Cali" on one axis and total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos on the other. Show the name "Cali" trending upwards on the graph, paralleled by a steady rise in total views on the same axis. The background features a sun-kissed California beach with individuals visibly basking in the laid-back atmosphere, engrossed in watching educational content on various devices. This image should illustrate the intertwining trajectory of the name "Cali" and the viewership of SmarterEveryDay, hinting at a correlation potentially influenced by the sunny allure of California.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
^{Show prompt for explanation} Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the first name Cali positively influenced Total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)

The Calli-ing of Cali: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Popularity of the Name Cali and Total Views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube Videos

The Journal of Quirky Social Phenomena

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!

^{Show prompt used to generate this paper} Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cali and Total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Calli-ing of Cali: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Popularity of the Name "Cali" and Total Views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on a quest to untangle the curious correlation between the choice of naming a child Cali and the total views on educational content provided by the SmarterEveryDay YouTube channel. Combining data from the US Social Security Administration with viewership statistics from YouTube, we set out to answer the burning question of whether there is a link between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. As we delved into the data, we couldn't help but notice the "Cali"-ber of curiosity surrounding this topic. (Dad joke level: expert)

With a correlation coefficient of 0.9095805 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2022, our findings reveal a remarkably strong positive association between the popularity of the name "Cali" and the total views accrued by SmarterEveryDay videos. This statistical relationship left us Cali-fornia dreamin' about the significance of a simple name on digital content consumption. (Dad joke level: off the charts)

Our results not only lend empirical support to the notion that the choice of name "Cali" may fuel interest in scientific and educational videos, but also raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of onomastics in shaping online engagement. The implications of our findings are as clear as a Cali-fornia day, demonstrating the surprising ways in which seemingly disparate elements can coalesce to yield meaningful insights. (Dad joke level: astronomical)

In conclusion, our study serves as a reminder that even in the realm of statistical analysis, there is always room for a little word play and pun-derful exploration. So, the next time you're pondering the impact of a name or the popularity of YouTube videos, remember that there may be more to it than meets the "Cali." (Dad joke level: legendary)

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The phenomenon of naming conventions has long intrigued scholars across various disciplines. From sociology to psychology, the choice of a name for an individual has been associated with a multitude of factors, including cultural trends, family traditions, and even phonetic preferences. In the realm of statistical analysis, however, delving into the influence of names on digital content consumption is a novel and Cali-gnificant pursuit. (Dad joke level: certified corny)
The SmarterEveryDay YouTube channel, renowned for its captivating and educational videos, serves as an ideal platform for examining the relationship between the popularity of the name "Cali" and overall viewership. Our research seeks to shed light on this connection, aiming to unveil the potential impact of names on the online dissemination of educational content. As we embarked on this venture, we couldn't help but wonder if there was something "Cali"-brated about this specific name. (Dad joke level: on par with a dad at a barbecue)
In the following sections, we present our findings from a comprehensive analysis of data spanning the years 2007 to 2022. By merging information from the US Social Security Administration's records of given names with the viewership statistics of SmarterEveryDay videos, we conducted a rigorous investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the name "Cali" and the total views garnered by the channel. The results proved to be as compelling as a "Cali"-fornia sunset. (Dad joke level: reaching peak dad status)
Through meticulous statistical examination, we arrived at a correlation coefficient of 0.9095805 and a p-value less than 0.01, demonstrating a strikingly strong positive association between the frequency of the name "Cali" and the total viewership of SmarterEveryDay content. This significant correlation led us to ponder the notion that individuals bearing the name "Cali" may possess an inherent inclination towards exploring scientific and educational materials online. It's as if the data was whispering, "Cali"-sco, here we go! (Dad joke level: bordering on dad joke overload)

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between the popularity of given names and various social and cultural phenomena has been a topic of interest for researchers for decades. Smith and Doe (2010) explored the influence of names on career success, while Jones et al. (2015) delved into the connection between names and consumer behavior. In a similar vein, our study focuses on unraveling the intriguing link between the choice of naming a child "Cali" and the total viewership of videos on the SmarterEveryDay YouTube channel. As we enter the realm of statistical analysis, the pun-dits of academia remind us that data exploration can be both rigorous and pun-derfully entertaining. (Dad joke level: punbelievable)

In "The Power of Names" by Johnson (2012), the author examines the significance of names in shaping individual identities and perceptions. Similarly, "The Naming of Names" by Smith (2018) offers insights into the cultural and historical context of naming practices. However, while these works provide valuable perspectives on the broader implications of names, they fall short of shedding light on the specific intersection of the name "Cali" and digital content consumption. (Dad joke level: nerdy puns for the win)

Turning to fiction, "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss and "Naming and Necessity" by Saul Kripke offer fictional and philosophical explorations of names and their underlying meanings. While these works may not directly address the correlation between the name "Cali" and YouTube viewership, they serve as a reminder of the enduring fascination with the power of names in shaping human experiences and perceptions. (Dad joke level: when in doubt, turn to fiction for name-related wisdom)

In the world of pop culture, TV shows like "Name That Tune" and "Call the Midwife" may not seem directly related to our research topic at first glance, but they highlight the omnipresence of naming conventions in various forms of media. After watching countless episodes in the name of research, we concluded that while these shows didn't provide direct insights into our study, they did help us appreciate the diverse manifestations of nomenclature in popular culture. (Dad joke level: TV time well spent in the pursuit of naming enlightenment)

As we journey through the literature, it's evident that the influence of names transcends disciplinary boundaries and continues to captivate the curious minds of researchers and enthusiasts alike. Our study contributes to this ever-evolving discourse by uncovering the surprising rapport between the name "Cali" and the engrossed viewers of SmarterEveryDay videos. It's a revelation that's both statistically robust and Cali-fornia cool. (Dad joke level: peak pun proficiency)

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cali and Total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and YouTube . You used data from 2007 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Calli-ing of Cali: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Popularity of the Name "Cali" and Total Views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on a quest to untangle the curious correlation between the choice of naming a child Cali and the total views on educational content provided by the SmarterEveryDay YouTube channel. Combining data from the US Social Security Administration with viewership statistics from YouTube, we set out to answer the burning question of whether there is a link between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. As we delved into the data, we couldn't help but notice the "Cali"-ber of curiosity surrounding this topic. (Dad joke level: expert)

With a correlation coefficient of 0.9095805 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2022, our findings reveal a remarkably strong positive association between the popularity of the name "Cali" and the total views accrued by SmarterEveryDay videos. This statistical relationship left us Cali-fornia dreamin' about the significance of a simple name on digital content consumption. (Dad joke level: off the charts)

Our results not only lend empirical support to the notion that the choice of name "Cali" may fuel interest in scientific and educational videos, but also raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of onomastics in shaping online engagement. The implications of our findings are as clear as a Cali-fornia day, demonstrating the surprising ways in which seemingly disparate elements can coalesce to yield meaningful insights. (Dad joke level: astronomical)

In conclusion, our study serves as a reminder that even in the realm of statistical analysis, there is always room for a little word play and pun-derful exploration. So, the next time you're pondering the impact of a name or the popularity of YouTube videos, remember that there may be more to it than meets the "Cali." (Dad joke level: legendary)

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The phenomenon of naming conventions has long intrigued scholars across various disciplines. From sociology to psychology, the choice of a name for an individual has been associated with a multitude of factors, including cultural trends, family traditions, and even phonetic preferences. In the realm of statistical analysis, however, delving into the influence of names on digital content consumption is a novel and Cali-gnificant pursuit. (Dad joke level: certified corny)
The SmarterEveryDay YouTube channel, renowned for its captivating and educational videos, serves as an ideal platform for examining the relationship between the popularity of the name "Cali" and overall viewership. Our research seeks to shed light on this connection, aiming to unveil the potential impact of names on the online dissemination of educational content. As we embarked on this venture, we couldn't help but wonder if there was something "Cali"-brated about this specific name. (Dad joke level: on par with a dad at a barbecue)
In the following sections, we present our findings from a comprehensive analysis of data spanning the years 2007 to 2022. By merging information from the US Social Security Administration's records of given names with the viewership statistics of SmarterEveryDay videos, we conducted a rigorous investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the name "Cali" and the total views garnered by the channel. The results proved to be as compelling as a "Cali"-fornia sunset. (Dad joke level: reaching peak dad status)
Through meticulous statistical examination, we arrived at a correlation coefficient of 0.9095805 and a p-value less than 0.01, demonstrating a strikingly strong positive association between the frequency of the name "Cali" and the total viewership of SmarterEveryDay content. This significant correlation led us to ponder the notion that individuals bearing the name "Cali" may possess an inherent inclination towards exploring scientific and educational materials online. It's as if the data was whispering, "Cali"-sco, here we go! (Dad joke level: bordering on dad joke overload)

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the mystique surrounding the connection between the popularity of the name "Cali" and the total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos, we employed a multidimensional approach that combined data mining, statistical analysis, and a healthy dose of dad jokes. Our research team scoured the depths of the internet, navigating through the virtual jungles of information to procure relevant data from sources including the US Social Security Administration and the labyrinthine web of YouTube's viewership statistics.

The initial phase of our methodological escapade involved extracting data on the frequency of the name "Cali" from the US Social Security Administration's treasure trove of naming records. We delved into the annual counts of newborns graced with the moniker "Cali" from 2007 to 2022, navigating through the sea of names like intrepid adventurers on a quest for statistical truth. It was quite the undertaking, akin to embarking on a data-driven archeological expedition to uncover the societal relics of nomenclature. (Dad joke level: ancient history pun)

Simultaneously, we embarked on a digital crusade to collect viewership statistics from the SmarterEveryDay YouTube channel, meticulously recording the total views garnered by its educational content over the same timeframe. Navigating the labyrinthine corridors of YouTube's analytics, our team journeyed through the annals of clicks and views, braving the deluge of cat videos and conspiracy theories that litter the digital landscape. It was an odyssey of data aggregation and statistical conquest, akin to Odysseus navigating the perilous waters of online content consumption. (Dad joke level: epic journey comparison)

With the respective datasets securely in our possession, we ventured into the heart of statistical analysis, wielding the formidable tools of correlation coefficients and regression models. We meticulously calculated the correlation between the frequency of the name "Cali" and the total views on SmarterEveryDay videos, invoking the powers of statistical software and number-crunching prowess to unveil the empirical relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. It was a process akin to concocting a complex statistical brew, with just the right Cali-bration of variables and a dash of academic wizardry. (Dad joke level: statistical sorcery)

In addition, as we sought to ensure the robustness of our findings, we supplemented our analysis with ancillary investigations into potential confounding factors. Exploring variables such as geographical distribution of the name "Cali" and thematic content of the SmarterEveryDay videos, we endeavored to suss out any lurking variables that might underpin the observed correlation. It was a meticulous unraveling of statistical threads, akin to untangling a particularly knotty mathematical puzzle. (Dad joke level: unruly pun)

Finally, to elucidate the comprehensiveness of our methodology, we incorporated a qualitative analysis phase, conducting interviews with individuals bearing the name "Cali" and avid viewers of SmarterEveryDay content. This served as a complimentary exploration of the experiential nuances underpinning the statistical associations uncovered in our quantitative analysis. It was a qualitative endeavor that allowed us to glimpse the human dimensions of the "Cali" phenomenon, akin to peering through a qualitative kaleidoscope of personal experiences. (Dad joke level: crystal-clear pun)

In summary, our methodology represents a fusion of data-driven exploration, statistical acumen, and a fervent appreciation for the art of dad jokes. It encapsulates the rigor and zeal with which we pursued our quest to unravel the enigmatic bond between the name "Cali" and the allure of educational content on YouTube. And as we ventured forth, we couldn't help but crack a few puns along the way to lighten the statistical load. (Dad joke level: off the charts - just like our correlation coefficient)

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cali and Total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Calli-ing of Cali: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Popularity of the Name "Cali" and Total Views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on a quest to untangle the curious correlation between the choice of naming a child Cali and the total views on educational content provided by the SmarterEveryDay YouTube channel. Combining data from the US Social Security Administration with viewership statistics from YouTube, we set out to answer the burning question of whether there is a link between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. As we delved into the data, we couldn't help but notice the "Cali"-ber of curiosity surrounding this topic. (Dad joke level: expert)

With a correlation coefficient of 0.9095805 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2022, our findings reveal a remarkably strong positive association between the popularity of the name "Cali" and the total views accrued by SmarterEveryDay videos. This statistical relationship left us Cali-fornia dreamin' about the significance of a simple name on digital content consumption. (Dad joke level: off the charts)

Our results not only lend empirical support to the notion that the choice of name "Cali" may fuel interest in scientific and educational videos, but also raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of onomastics in shaping online engagement. The implications of our findings are as clear as a Cali-fornia day, demonstrating the surprising ways in which seemingly disparate elements can coalesce to yield meaningful insights. (Dad joke level: astronomical)

In conclusion, our study serves as a reminder that even in the realm of statistical analysis, there is always room for a little word play and pun-derful exploration. So, the next time you're pondering the impact of a name or the popularity of YouTube videos, remember that there may be more to it than meets the "Cali." (Dad joke level: legendary)

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between the popularity of given names and various social and cultural phenomena has been a topic of interest for researchers for decades. Smith and Doe (2010) explored the influence of names on career success, while Jones et al. (2015) delved into the connection between names and consumer behavior. In a similar vein, our study focuses on unraveling the intriguing link between the choice of naming a child "Cali" and the total viewership of videos on the SmarterEveryDay YouTube channel. As we enter the realm of statistical analysis, the pun-dits of academia remind us that data exploration can be both rigorous and pun-derfully entertaining. (Dad joke level: punbelievable)
In "The Power of Names" by Johnson (2012), the author examines the significance of names in shaping individual identities and perceptions. Similarly, "The Naming of Names" by Smith (2018) offers insights into the cultural and historical context of naming practices. However, while these works provide valuable perspectives on the broader implications of names, they fall short of shedding light on the specific intersection of the name "Cali" and digital content consumption. (Dad joke level: nerdy puns for the win)
Turning to fiction, "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss and "Naming and Necessity" by Saul Kripke offer fictional and philosophical explorations of names and their underlying meanings. While these works may not directly address the correlation between the name "Cali" and YouTube viewership, they serve as a reminder of the enduring fascination with the power of names in shaping human experiences and perceptions. (Dad joke level: when in doubt, turn to fiction for name-related wisdom)
In the world of pop culture, TV shows like "Name That Tune" and "Call the Midwife" may not seem directly related to our research topic at first glance, but they highlight the omnipresence of naming conventions in various forms of media. After watching countless episodes in the name of research, we concluded that while these shows didn't provide direct insights into our study, they did help us appreciate the diverse manifestations of nomenclature in popular culture. (Dad joke level: TV time well spent in the pursuit of naming enlightenment)
As we journey through the literature, it's evident that the influence of names transcends disciplinary boundaries and continues to captivate the curious minds of researchers and enthusiasts alike. Our study contributes to this ever-evolving discourse by uncovering the surprising rapport between the name "Cali" and the engrossed viewers of SmarterEveryDay videos. It's a revelation that's both statistically robust and Cali-fornia cool. (Dad joke level: peak pun proficiency)

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data spanning from 2007 to 2022 unveiled a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the name "Cali" and the total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9095805 and an r-squared value of 0.8273367. The p-value for this relationship was found to be less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association. These results left us feeling quite "Cali"-brated about the potential impact of a name on digital content consumption. (Dad joke level: through the roof)
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 visually captures the robust positive correlation between the frequency of the name "Cali" and the total viewership of SmarterEveryDay videos, further solidifying the statistical evidence of this intriguing connection. It's as clear as a "Cali"-fornia sky that there's something special about this name and its relationship with online educational content. (Dad joke level: not even sorry)
In summary, our research has brought to light the unexpected influence of a name on the consumption of educational materials, sparking discussions about the profound impact of names on online engagement. It seems that the name "Cali" may indeed carry a certain charm that draws individuals to seek out scientific and educational content. This revelation has left us wondering if we should start a new research venture into the influence of other names on digital spaces - perhaps it's time to investigate the "Ava"-lanche of views or the "John"-erous support for certain types of content. (Dad joke level: unstoppable)

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The connection between the popularity of the name "Cali" and the total viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos turns out to be more than just a pun-derful coincidence. Our findings affirm the prior research that has long hinted at the influence of names on various social and cultural phenomena. Essentially, naming your child "Cali" might just manifest in a predilection for engrossing scientific content, providing a "Cali"brated boost to YouTube viewership. It's certainly a "Cali"-bration of curiosity! (Dad joke level: name game on point)

Much like the notable work of Smith and Doe (2010) on the influence of names on career success, our study showcases the palpable influence of a name, riffing on the idea that choosing the name "Cali" may set a course for an inherent attraction to educational content. The alignment of our results with previous literature further buttresses the significance of onomastics in shaping various aspects of human behavior and societal trends. It appears that when it comes to names, "Cali"-brating their impact is the name of the game. (Dad joke level: pun-believable parallels)

Drawing from the literary musings of Johnson (2012) and Smith (2018) on the power and historical context of names, our research underscores the tangible impact of a particular moniker on digital content consumption. While we may not have summoned the spirit of Patrick Rothfuss or Saul Kripke, the fictional and philosophical explorations of names did prepare us for the unexpected revelation that naming a child "Cali" might just set the stage for a proclivity towards consuming science-laden content. It's a discovery that's as potent as a magical incantation! (Dad joke level: summoning name-related wisdom)

The connection between the chosen name "Cali" and the penchant for educational content goes beyond statistical robustness, delving into the realm of cultural influence and digital engagement. This revelation not only enriches the discourse on the power of names but also throws open the door for future investigations into the influence of other names on digital spaces. After all, who wouldn't be curious about the potential impact of names like "Ava" or "John" on content consumption? It's time to let the names lead the way in this pun-believably intriguing terrain of research. (Dad joke level: pun-derrated inquiries)

In sum, our study epitomizes the transformative potential of names, showing that even in the statistical arena, there's ample room for a pun-derful exploration into the seemingly ordinary aspects of nomenclature. It seems that the impact of a name can indeed go beyond mere identity, carving a path for engagement with digital content in ways we never imagined. It's a revelation that leaves us "Cali"-fornia dreamin' about the inherent power of a simple name. (Dad joke level: legendary reverberations)

And with that, our discussion on the whimsical connection between the name "Cali" and SmarterEveryDay YouTube views closes on a pun-believably high note!

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cali and Total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Calli-ing of Cali: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Popularity of the Name "Cali" and Total Views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on a quest to untangle the curious correlation between the choice of naming a child Cali and the total views on educational content provided by the SmarterEveryDay YouTube channel. Combining data from the US Social Security Administration with viewership statistics from YouTube, we set out to answer the burning question of whether there is a link between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. As we delved into the data, we couldn't help but notice the "Cali"-ber of curiosity surrounding this topic. (Dad joke level: expert)

With a correlation coefficient of 0.9095805 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2022, our findings reveal a remarkably strong positive association between the popularity of the name "Cali" and the total views accrued by SmarterEveryDay videos. This statistical relationship left us Cali-fornia dreamin' about the significance of a simple name on digital content consumption. (Dad joke level: off the charts)

Our results not only lend empirical support to the notion that the choice of name "Cali" may fuel interest in scientific and educational videos, but also raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of onomastics in shaping online engagement. The implications of our findings are as clear as a Cali-fornia day, demonstrating the surprising ways in which seemingly disparate elements can coalesce to yield meaningful insights. (Dad joke level: astronomical)

In conclusion, our study serves as a reminder that even in the realm of statistical analysis, there is always room for a little word play and pun-derful exploration. So, the next time you're pondering the impact of a name or the popularity of YouTube videos, remember that there may be more to it than meets the "Cali." (Dad joke level: legendary)

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The phenomenon of naming conventions has long intrigued scholars across various disciplines. From sociology to psychology, the choice of a name for an individual has been associated with a multitude of factors, including cultural trends, family traditions, and even phonetic preferences. In the realm of statistical analysis, however, delving into the influence of names on digital content consumption is a novel and Cali-gnificant pursuit. (Dad joke level: certified corny)
The SmarterEveryDay YouTube channel, renowned for its captivating and educational videos, serves as an ideal platform for examining the relationship between the popularity of the name "Cali" and overall viewership. Our research seeks to shed light on this connection, aiming to unveil the potential impact of names on the online dissemination of educational content. As we embarked on this venture, we couldn't help but wonder if there was something "Cali"-brated about this specific name. (Dad joke level: on par with a dad at a barbecue)
In the following sections, we present our findings from a comprehensive analysis of data spanning the years 2007 to 2022. By merging information from the US Social Security Administration's records of given names with the viewership statistics of SmarterEveryDay videos, we conducted a rigorous investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the name "Cali" and the total views garnered by the channel. The results proved to be as compelling as a "Cali"-fornia sunset. (Dad joke level: reaching peak dad status)
Through meticulous statistical examination, we arrived at a correlation coefficient of 0.9095805 and a p-value less than 0.01, demonstrating a strikingly strong positive association between the frequency of the name "Cali" and the total viewership of SmarterEveryDay content. This significant correlation led us to ponder the notion that individuals bearing the name "Cali" may possess an inherent inclination towards exploring scientific and educational materials online. It's as if the data was whispering, "Cali"-sco, here we go! (Dad joke level: bordering on dad joke overload)

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data spanning from 2007 to 2022 unveiled a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the name "Cali" and the total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9095805 and an r-squared value of 0.8273367. The p-value for this relationship was found to be less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association. These results left us feeling quite "Cali"-brated about the potential impact of a name on digital content consumption. (Dad joke level: through the roof)
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 visually captures the robust positive correlation between the frequency of the name "Cali" and the total viewership of SmarterEveryDay videos, further solidifying the statistical evidence of this intriguing connection. It's as clear as a "Cali"-fornia sky that there's something special about this name and its relationship with online educational content. (Dad joke level: not even sorry)
In summary, our research has brought to light the unexpected influence of a name on the consumption of educational materials, sparking discussions about the profound impact of names on online engagement. It seems that the name "Cali" may indeed carry a certain charm that draws individuals to seek out scientific and educational content. This revelation has left us wondering if we should start a new research venture into the influence of other names on digital spaces - perhaps it's time to investigate the "Ava"-lanche of views or the "John"-erous support for certain types of content. (Dad joke level: unstoppable)

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has revealed a strikingly strong correlation between the popularity of the name "Cali" and the total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. It's as if the data was saying, "Cali"-brate good times, come on! (Dad joke level: off the charts)

The implications of our findings not only emphasize the potential influence of onomastics on digital content consumption but also invite further exploration into the interplay between nomenclature and online engagement. This research has certainly made a "Cali"-cious case for the captivating effect of a name on viewership patterns. (Dad joke level: pun-believable)

Given the provocative insights gained from our investigation, it's tempting to delve into the impact of other names on various aspects of online activity. Who knows, we might uncover the "Emma"-nating appeal of certain types of content or the "Liam"-itless potential of digital trends. (Dad joke level: reaching legendary status)

However, in the spirit of empirical rigor and responsible research practices, it's clear that no further inquiries into the relationship between the popularity of the name "Cali" and total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos are needed. Sometimes, you just have to "Cali" it a day. (Dad joke level: certified dad humor)

The results of our study stand as a testament to the unexpected avenues of influence in the digital realm, demonstrating that a simple name can wield a surprising impact on content consumption patterns. As for the future, let's not "Cali"-gulate our excitement for the next quirky research endeavor. (Dad joke level: dad joke overload)

In conclusion, we "Cali"-brate the prospect of unveiling more curious connections in the vast landscape of digital interactions but concede that further studies in this particular area are unnecessary. It's as clear as a "Cali"-fornia beach day - this line of inquiry has served its purpose. (Dad joke level: unparalleled)

No more research is needed in the "Cali"-bration between the popularity of the name "Cali" and total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Case closed! (Dad joke level: dad joke mic drop)

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Calli-ing of Cali: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Popularity of the Name Cali and Total Views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Social Phenomena

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Calli-ing of Cali: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Popularity of the Name Cali and Total Views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Research Advancement and Exploration (SQUARE)

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Calli-ing of Cali: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Popularity of the Name Cali and Total Views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube Videos with an abstract of In this study, we embark on a quest to untangle the curious correlation between the choice of naming a child Cali and the total views on educational content provided by the SmarterEveryDay YouTube channel. Combining data from the US Social Security Administration with viewership statistics from YouTube, we set out to answer the burning question of whether there is a link between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. As we delved into the data, we couldn't help but notice the "Cali"-ber of curiosity surrounding this topic. (Dad joke level: expert)
With a correlation coefficient of 0.9095805 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2022, our findings reveal a remarkably strong positive association between the popularity of the name "Cali" and the total views accrued by SmarterEveryDay videos. This statistical relationship left us Cali-fornia dreamin' about the significance of a simple name on digital content consumption. (Dad joke level: off the charts)
Our results not only lend empirical support to the notion that the choice of name "Cali" may fuel interest in scientific and educational videos, but also raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of onomastics in shaping online engagement. The implications of our findings are as clear as a Cali-fornia day, demonstrating the surprising ways in which seemingly disparate elements can coalesce to yield meaningful insights. (Dad joke level: astronomical)
In conclusion, our study serves as a reminder that even in the realm of statistical analysis, there is always room for a little word play and pun-derful exploration. So, the next time you're pondering the impact of a name or the popularity of YouTube videos, remember that there may be more to it than meets the "Cali." (Dad joke level: legendary)

ChatGPT:

"popularity of the name Cali," "Cali name statistics," "YouTube video viewership correlation," "SmarterEveryDay YouTube channel data," "US Social Security Administration naming trends," "Cali name influence on digital content," "onomastics in online engagement," "statistical analysis of name influence," "Cali name and educational videos," "correlation coefficient and p-value significance," "empirical support for name influence," "word play and statistical analysis," "impact of a name on digital content."

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.

Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error

Data details

Popularity of the first name Cali
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Cali
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Cali

Total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos.
Source: SmarterEveryDay on YouTube
Additional Info: ^{See full details} Current total views of videos released that year.

See what else correlates with Total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9095805 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r² = 0.8273367 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Cali) over the 16 years from 2007 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.04E-6.^Show 0.0000010403380190969609000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme.^Note More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 0.000104% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 961,226 random variables^Note You don't actually need 961 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, ^Note Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.75, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
^{Read more about the confidence interval} The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!

All values for the years included above: ^Note If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.

	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	2021	2022
Popularity of the first name Cali (Babies born)	664	739	739	765	826	954	1144	1685	1467	1230	1152	1222	1248	1137	990	865
Total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos (Total views)	615946	5575900	476119	5311860	51314700	44622900	113297000	175733000	118608000	72191700	74776900	101810000	104650000	149482000	68057000	35676200

Why this works

Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
Lack of causal connection: There is probably^Note Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple^Note Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. ^Note Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.

Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. ^{Show the steps to do this.} Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."

# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([664,739,739,765,826,954,1144,1685,1467,1230,1152,1222,1248,1137,990,865,])
array_2 = np.array([615946,5575900,476119,5311860,51314700,44622900,113297000,175733000,118608000,72191700,74776900,101810000,104650000,149482000,68057000,35676200,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Cali"
array_2_name = "Total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)

Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. ^Note Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:

High resolution line chart ^Note The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.

If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.

Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape.
High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
Alternative high resolution line chart
Scatterplot
Portable line chart (png)
Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
Line chart for only Popularity of the first name Cali
Line chart for only Total views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos
AI-generated correlation image
The spurious research paper: The Calli-ing of Cali: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Popularity of the Name Cali and Total Views on SmarterEveryDay YouTube Videos

View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!

Correlation ID: 4564 · Black Variable ID: 3859 · Red Variable ID: 25505


Problem variable:
Issue:
Additional details: Optional
Confirm you are a human: