about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,524 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Connecticut and the second variable is Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion.  The chart goes from 1979 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The democratic candidate is really cutting the mustard with the voters, leading to a surge in support for their party. This surge is creating a political appetite for change, which is somehow translating to an increase in hot dog consumption. It's as if the voters are saying, "Yes, we Khan eat more hot dogs!"

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image that encapsulates the spirit of political voting and competitive eating in a minimalistic style. Show a bustling street scene in Connecticut with a large crowd gathered around a grand podium where people are voting for the Democrat Presidential candidate. Meanwhile, nearby, depict the reigning champion of the Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating Competition skillfully devouring a mountain of hot dogs. Ensure the atmosphere conveys excitement, anticipation, and the intertwined energy of political change and competitive eating. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Connecticut and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Woodblock painting Macabre Minimalism Parallax art Voxel art
ChatGPT: Minimalism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Connecticut and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion, in the following situation: The democratic candidate is really cutting the mustard with the voters, leading to a surge in support for their party. This surge is creating a political appetite for change, which is somehow translating to an increase in hot dog consumption. It's as if the voters are saying, "Yes, we Khan eat more hot dogs!". Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Amid the hustle and bustle of bustling streets, a large crowd gathers around a grand podium in Connecticut. The air is filled with excitement and anticipation as people line up to cast their votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate. Meanwhile, at the nearby Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating Competition, the reigning champion is skillfully devouring a mountain of sizzling hot dogs, breaking records with every bite. The aroma of sizzling hot dogs fills the air, as the energy of political change and the spirit of competitive eating intertwine in an unexpected and amusing display.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Minimalism ] and depicting this scene: Amid the hustle and bustle of bustling streets, a large crowd gathers around a grand podium in Connecticut. The air is filled with excitement and anticipation as people line up to cast their votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate. Meanwhile, at the nearby Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating Competition, the reigning champion is skillfully devouring a mountain of sizzling hot dogs, breaking records with every bite. The aroma of sizzling hot dogs fills the air, as the energy of political change and the spirit of competitive eating intertwine in an unexpected and amusing display. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image that encapsulates the spirit of political voting and competitive eating in a minimalistic style. Show a bustling street scene in Connecticut with a large crowd gathered around a grand podium where people are voting for the Democrat Presidential candidate. Meanwhile, nearby, depict the reigning champion of the Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating Competition skillfully devouring a mountain of hot dogs. Ensure the atmosphere conveys excitement, anticipation, and the intertwined energy of political change and competitive eating.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Connecticut caused Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Correlating Connecticut's Democrat Votes with Devouring Dogs: A Curious Connection

The Journal of Quirky Political Science

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Connecticut and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9171163 and p < 0.01 for 1979 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Correlating Connecticut's Democrat Votes with Devouring Dogs: A Curious Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing relationship between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing numerical data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia, our research team engaged in a thorough analysis, unearthing a compelling connection that is sure to raise eyebrows and appetites. We uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9171163 and p < 0.01, spanning the years from 1979 to 2020.

The findings reveal a significant positive correlation between the number of votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the quantity of hotdogs devoured by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. It appears that as one increases, so does the other, leading to the tantalizing conclusion that political preferences may have a direct impact on the propensity for indulging in delectable, sodium-laden sausages on a grand stage. As dad would say, "Looks like these hotdogs really cut the mustard when it comes to predicting election outcomes!"

This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the social and culinary influences that underlie the voting behavior in Connecticut. The implications of our findings may extend beyond the realm of electoral analysis, shedding new light on the intricate interplay between democratic choices and gastronomic tendencies. As we venture down this peculiar research avenue, one thing is certain – the wieners have it, and so does democracy!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Connecticut and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Correlating Connecticut's Democrat Votes with Devouring Dogs: A Curious Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing relationship between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing numerical data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia, our research team engaged in a thorough analysis, unearthing a compelling connection that is sure to raise eyebrows and appetites. We uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9171163 and p < 0.01, spanning the years from 1979 to 2020.

The findings reveal a significant positive correlation between the number of votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the quantity of hotdogs devoured by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. It appears that as one increases, so does the other, leading to the tantalizing conclusion that political preferences may have a direct impact on the propensity for indulging in delectable, sodium-laden sausages on a grand stage. As dad would say, "Looks like these hotdogs really cut the mustard when it comes to predicting election outcomes!"

This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the social and culinary influences that underlie the voting behavior in Connecticut. The implications of our findings may extend beyond the realm of electoral analysis, shedding new light on the intricate interplay between democratic choices and gastronomic tendencies. As we venture down this peculiar research avenue, one thing is certain – the wieners have it, and so does democracy!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Buckle up, dear readers, as we embark on a journey that will not only tantalize your taste buds but also challenge conventional wisdom in the realm of electoral analysis. Who would have thought that the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the devouring of hotdogs could be connected in a way that defies logic and tickles the senses? The correlation uncovered in this study could only be described as "frankly" surprising!

Throughout the years, Connecticut has been a battleground for political ideologies, with the Democratic candidate garnering remarkable support from the Nutmeg State. Meanwhile, in the realm of competitive eating, the annual Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has seen champions inhaling an astonishing number of hotdogs within a limited timeframe. One might jest that these competitors are truly "relishing" the opportunity to showcase their talents.

The foundation of this study rests on the theory that electoral preferences may extend beyond the confines of the ballot box and manifest in unexpected arenas – in this case, competitive eating. Who would have thought that the nuances of political inclinations could find expression in the consumption of hotdogs? It seems the saying "you are what you eat" takes on a whole new meaning in this context. As my dear old dad likes to quip, "Looks like these hotdogs can vote with their feet – by marching straight into someone's stomach!"

As we delve into the peculiar correlation between these seemingly disparate elements, it becomes clear that there might be more at play than mere happenstance. The statistical analysis reveals a strong positive correlation between the votes cast for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the number of hotdogs devoured by the Nathan's champion. This correlation compels us to question the interplay between political predispositions and gustatory indulgence. It's almost as if the hotdogs themselves are casting a vote for the dinner table!

With these initial findings, we stand at the precipice of uncovering a connection that challenges traditional paradigms and invites further exploration into the depths of culinary and political interrelationships. As we continue our journey, driven by an insatiable curiosity and perhaps a craving for both empirical evidence and a good hotdog, we invite you to join us in unraveling the enigmatic ties between democratic votes and hotdog consumption in Connecticut. After all, in this curious correlation, the proof is not just in the pudding, but in the mustard, relish, and ketchup as well!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Connecticut and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Correlating Connecticut's Democrat Votes with Devouring Dogs: A Curious Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing relationship between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing numerical data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia, our research team engaged in a thorough analysis, unearthing a compelling connection that is sure to raise eyebrows and appetites. We uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9171163 and p < 0.01, spanning the years from 1979 to 2020.

The findings reveal a significant positive correlation between the number of votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the quantity of hotdogs devoured by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. It appears that as one increases, so does the other, leading to the tantalizing conclusion that political preferences may have a direct impact on the propensity for indulging in delectable, sodium-laden sausages on a grand stage. As dad would say, "Looks like these hotdogs really cut the mustard when it comes to predicting election outcomes!"

This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the social and culinary influences that underlie the voting behavior in Connecticut. The implications of our findings may extend beyond the realm of electoral analysis, shedding new light on the intricate interplay between democratic choices and gastronomic tendencies. As we venture down this peculiar research avenue, one thing is certain – the wieners have it, and so does democracy!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Buckle up, dear readers, as we embark on a journey that will not only tantalize your taste buds but also challenge conventional wisdom in the realm of electoral analysis. Who would have thought that the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the devouring of hotdogs could be connected in a way that defies logic and tickles the senses? The correlation uncovered in this study could only be described as "frankly" surprising!
Throughout the years, Connecticut has been a battleground for political ideologies, with the Democratic candidate garnering remarkable support from the Nutmeg State. Meanwhile, in the realm of competitive eating, the annual Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has seen champions inhaling an astonishing number of hotdogs within a limited timeframe. One might jest that these competitors are truly "relishing" the opportunity to showcase their talents.
The foundation of this study rests on the theory that electoral preferences may extend beyond the confines of the ballot box and manifest in unexpected arenas – in this case, competitive eating. Who would have thought that the nuances of political inclinations could find expression in the consumption of hotdogs? It seems the saying "you are what you eat" takes on a whole new meaning in this context. As my dear old dad likes to quip, "Looks like these hotdogs can vote with their feet – by marching straight into someone's stomach!"
As we delve into the peculiar correlation between these seemingly disparate elements, it becomes clear that there might be more at play than mere happenstance. The statistical analysis reveals a strong positive correlation between the votes cast for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the number of hotdogs devoured by the Nathan's champion. This correlation compels us to question the interplay between political predispositions and gustatory indulgence. It's almost as if the hotdogs themselves are casting a vote for the dinner table!
With these initial findings, we stand at the precipice of uncovering a connection that challenges traditional paradigms and invites further exploration into the depths of culinary and political interrelationships. As we continue our journey, driven by an insatiable curiosity and perhaps a craving for both empirical evidence and a good hotdog, we invite you to join us in unraveling the enigmatic ties between democratic votes and hotdog consumption in Connecticut. After all, in this curious correlation, the proof is not just in the pudding, but in the mustard, relish, and ketchup as well!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2015) explored the uncharted territory of electoral data analysis, delving into the nuances of voter behavior in the state of Connecticut. Their rigorous statistical approach uncovered patterns that shed light on the political landscape of this region. Meanwhile, Jones et al. (2018) embarked on a culinary odyssey, documenting the feats of champions in competitive eating events. These endeavors provide a crucial foundation for our investigation into the curious connection between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.

As we consider the peculiar correlation between these variables, it is worth noting the potential implications it may have on our understanding of political engagement and gustatory excess. As the famous saying goes, “Why was the math book sad? Because it had too many problems.” Similarly, our research aims to uncover the underlying problems and provide a mathematical narrative that intertwines political preferences with the consumption of hotdogs.

Drawing from seminal texts like “Hot Dogs: A Global History” by Bruce Kraig and “American Political Parties and Elections: A Very Short Introduction” by L. Sandy Maisel, we begin to appreciate the historical, cultural, and political contexts that underpin both the act of casting votes and the devouring of hotdogs. These literary works offer a comprehensive foundation for our exploration, allowing us to contextualize the curious correlation within the broader spectrum of human behavior and social phenomena.

In addition to these scholarly works, we cannot overlook the insightful fiction novels that, whether by design or coincidence, touch upon the themes of politics and gastronomy. J.K. Rowling's "The Order of the Hotdog" adds a whimsical layer to our understanding, as it likely resonates with the wizardry required to comprehend the enigmatic connection we are endeavoring to unravel. Furthermore, George Orwell's "Animal Farm" serves as a poignant allegory, reminding us that “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others” – a sentiment that may reverberate in our examination of voting and hotdog consumption patterns.

Exploring modern mediums of communication, popular memes such as the “Biden Eating Ice Cream” series and the “Hotdog Cat” meme illuminate the complexities of intertwining political figures and culinary delights. These cultural phenomena serve as curious mirror images of our own investigation, compelling us to ponder the surreal intersections between the serious realm of politics and the more light-hearted world of internet humor.

In sum, the literature surrounding our research topic provides a rich tapestry of insights, weaving together historical, cultural, and fictional narratives that bear relevance to our curious correlation. By synthesizing these diverse sources, we aim to navigate the labyrinth of political and gastronomic associations, drawing ever closer to untangling the savory enigma that has captured our scholarly appetites. As the dust jacket from Dr. Seuss' "Green Eggs and Ham" posits, “Try them, try them, and you may! Try them and you may, I say.” With that spirit of conviction, we march forward into the realm of academic inquiry, poised to savor the intellectual feast that awaits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Connecticut and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Wikipedia . You used data from 1979 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Correlating Connecticut's Democrat Votes with Devouring Dogs: A Curious Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing relationship between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing numerical data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia, our research team engaged in a thorough analysis, unearthing a compelling connection that is sure to raise eyebrows and appetites. We uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9171163 and p < 0.01, spanning the years from 1979 to 2020.

The findings reveal a significant positive correlation between the number of votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the quantity of hotdogs devoured by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. It appears that as one increases, so does the other, leading to the tantalizing conclusion that political preferences may have a direct impact on the propensity for indulging in delectable, sodium-laden sausages on a grand stage. As dad would say, "Looks like these hotdogs really cut the mustard when it comes to predicting election outcomes!"

This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the social and culinary influences that underlie the voting behavior in Connecticut. The implications of our findings may extend beyond the realm of electoral analysis, shedding new light on the intricate interplay between democratic choices and gastronomic tendencies. As we venture down this peculiar research avenue, one thing is certain – the wieners have it, and so does democracy!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Buckle up, dear readers, as we embark on a journey that will not only tantalize your taste buds but also challenge conventional wisdom in the realm of electoral analysis. Who would have thought that the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the devouring of hotdogs could be connected in a way that defies logic and tickles the senses? The correlation uncovered in this study could only be described as "frankly" surprising!
Throughout the years, Connecticut has been a battleground for political ideologies, with the Democratic candidate garnering remarkable support from the Nutmeg State. Meanwhile, in the realm of competitive eating, the annual Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has seen champions inhaling an astonishing number of hotdogs within a limited timeframe. One might jest that these competitors are truly "relishing" the opportunity to showcase their talents.
The foundation of this study rests on the theory that electoral preferences may extend beyond the confines of the ballot box and manifest in unexpected arenas – in this case, competitive eating. Who would have thought that the nuances of political inclinations could find expression in the consumption of hotdogs? It seems the saying "you are what you eat" takes on a whole new meaning in this context. As my dear old dad likes to quip, "Looks like these hotdogs can vote with their feet – by marching straight into someone's stomach!"
As we delve into the peculiar correlation between these seemingly disparate elements, it becomes clear that there might be more at play than mere happenstance. The statistical analysis reveals a strong positive correlation between the votes cast for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the number of hotdogs devoured by the Nathan's champion. This correlation compels us to question the interplay between political predispositions and gustatory indulgence. It's almost as if the hotdogs themselves are casting a vote for the dinner table!
With these initial findings, we stand at the precipice of uncovering a connection that challenges traditional paradigms and invites further exploration into the depths of culinary and political interrelationships. As we continue our journey, driven by an insatiable curiosity and perhaps a craving for both empirical evidence and a good hotdog, we invite you to join us in unraveling the enigmatic ties between democratic votes and hotdog consumption in Connecticut. After all, in this curious correlation, the proof is not just in the pudding, but in the mustard, relish, and ketchup as well!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To begin our investigation into the mystifying relationship between Connecticut's Democrat votes and hotdog consumption, our research team embarked on an odyssey through the realms of statistics, political analysis, and competitive eating. We amassed data from a variety of sources, primarily relying on repositories such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia. Employing a meticulously crafted algorithm, which strikingly resembled a Rube Goldberg machine tweaked for data collection, we meticulously extracted and examined information from the years 1979 to 2020. It was a process so convoluted that it could have been named the "Wiener Whirlwind Research Contraption," a contraption that merits a standing ovation or at least a polite golf clap!

Upon procuring the requisite data, we subjected it to a rigorous series of statistical measures, including correlation analysis, to unveil potential patterns and associations. Much like a connoisseur meticulously dissects a hotdog to inspect its constituent ingredients, we painstakingly disentangled the electoral votes and hotdog-eating triumphs to reveal the tantalizing linkage between these two seemingly incongruous entities. This analysis was as complex and interwoven as a hotdog eating contest participant's technique for consuming an excessive number of sausages within a confined period – both artful and methodical, yet undoubtedly messy.

Furthermore, our team incorporated advanced regression models to scrutinize the temporal trends in voter tendencies and voracious hotdog consumption, aiming to discern any temporal fluctuations or historical deviations. It was as intricate a process as deciding whether to opt for the classic mustard or adventurous kimchi topping on one's gourmet hotdog – a decision that could have long-lasting consequences for one’s taste buds.

Moreover, in an attempt to account for potential confounding variables and lurking extraneous influences, we engaged in a comprehensive sensitivity analysis, akin to discerning the precise balance of flavors in a critically acclaimed gourmet hotdog. For just as the careful fusion of condiments can elevate a humble sausage into a culinary delight, our sensitivity analysis sought to discern the subtleties in the relationship between Democrat votes and hotdog consumption, removing potential sources of bias and distortion.

Lastly, in an unprecedented move befitting our unconventional research subject, we invoked the surreptitious yet illuminating technique of outsider art interpretation, wherein we encouraged participants to etch their feelings and perhaps culinary aspirations onto blank canvases, all while under the influence of a tantalizingly grilled hotdog. Although seemingly unconventional, this approach provided us with a unique lens through which to apprehend the emotional and spiritual ties that bind political preferences and gustatory predilections.

Thus, armed with an eclectic array of data procurement techniques, statistical analyses, and a pinch of artistic musing, we endeavored to unravel the enigma that is the connection between Connecticut's Democrat votes and the consumption of hotdogs. The resulting methodology was a testament to our research team's unwavering commitment, unorthodox creativity, and insatiable appetite for uncovering scholarly truths – a feat that could only be ascertained with a resounding declaration: "Hot Diggity Dog, we've plucked a correlation from the mustard-soaked ether!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Connecticut and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Wikipedia .

For the time period 1979 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9171163, r-squared of 0.8411024, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Correlating Connecticut's Democrat Votes with Devouring Dogs: A Curious Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing relationship between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing numerical data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia, our research team engaged in a thorough analysis, unearthing a compelling connection that is sure to raise eyebrows and appetites. We uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9171163 and p < 0.01, spanning the years from 1979 to 2020.

The findings reveal a significant positive correlation between the number of votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the quantity of hotdogs devoured by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. It appears that as one increases, so does the other, leading to the tantalizing conclusion that political preferences may have a direct impact on the propensity for indulging in delectable, sodium-laden sausages on a grand stage. As dad would say, "Looks like these hotdogs really cut the mustard when it comes to predicting election outcomes!"

This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the social and culinary influences that underlie the voting behavior in Connecticut. The implications of our findings may extend beyond the realm of electoral analysis, shedding new light on the intricate interplay between democratic choices and gastronomic tendencies. As we venture down this peculiar research avenue, one thing is certain – the wieners have it, and so does democracy!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Buckle up, dear readers, as we embark on a journey that will not only tantalize your taste buds but also challenge conventional wisdom in the realm of electoral analysis. Who would have thought that the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the devouring of hotdogs could be connected in a way that defies logic and tickles the senses? The correlation uncovered in this study could only be described as "frankly" surprising!
Throughout the years, Connecticut has been a battleground for political ideologies, with the Democratic candidate garnering remarkable support from the Nutmeg State. Meanwhile, in the realm of competitive eating, the annual Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has seen champions inhaling an astonishing number of hotdogs within a limited timeframe. One might jest that these competitors are truly "relishing" the opportunity to showcase their talents.
The foundation of this study rests on the theory that electoral preferences may extend beyond the confines of the ballot box and manifest in unexpected arenas – in this case, competitive eating. Who would have thought that the nuances of political inclinations could find expression in the consumption of hotdogs? It seems the saying "you are what you eat" takes on a whole new meaning in this context. As my dear old dad likes to quip, "Looks like these hotdogs can vote with their feet – by marching straight into someone's stomach!"
As we delve into the peculiar correlation between these seemingly disparate elements, it becomes clear that there might be more at play than mere happenstance. The statistical analysis reveals a strong positive correlation between the votes cast for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the number of hotdogs devoured by the Nathan's champion. This correlation compels us to question the interplay between political predispositions and gustatory indulgence. It's almost as if the hotdogs themselves are casting a vote for the dinner table!
With these initial findings, we stand at the precipice of uncovering a connection that challenges traditional paradigms and invites further exploration into the depths of culinary and political interrelationships. As we continue our journey, driven by an insatiable curiosity and perhaps a craving for both empirical evidence and a good hotdog, we invite you to join us in unraveling the enigmatic ties between democratic votes and hotdog consumption in Connecticut. After all, in this curious correlation, the proof is not just in the pudding, but in the mustard, relish, and ketchup as well!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In scrutinizing the electoral landscape and the world of competitive eating, we unearthed a remarkable correlation between the number of votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9171163, indicating a strong positive relationship.

The r-squared value of 0.8411024 further underscores the robustness of the correlation, suggesting that approximately 84% of the variance in hotdog consumption by the Nathan's champion can be explained by the number of Democrat votes in Connecticut. It's as if the votes are not just shaping the political landscape, but also the gastronomic one – a true feat of "wein-gineering," if you will!

The p-value of less than 0.01 highlights the statistical significance of our findings, firmly cementing the connection between political preferences and the propensity to devour copious amounts of hotdogs. It seems that amidst the fierce battles for electoral victory, a separate battle is being waged – a battle of the buns, ketchup, and mustard, where the victor emerges not through votes but through a display of jaw-dropping competitive eating prowess.

Our findings are encapsulated in Fig. 1, a scatterplot illustrating the tight clustering of data points, affirming the strong positive correlation between the two variables. It's as if each hotdog eaten by the champion represents a vote of sorts, an edible endorsement of the political choices made in the Nutmeg State.

As our research into this unlikely intersection of democratic votes and hotdog consumption unfolds, it becomes increasingly evident that a nuanced relationship underpins this correlation. The implications of these findings stretch beyond the realm of empirical analysis, infusing a touch of whimsy and wonder into the seemingly separate domains of politics and competitive eating.

In uncovering this unexpected connection, we invite our readers to ponder the implications of this correlation and embrace the delightful absurdity inherent in these seemingly incongruent phenomena. As we digest the implications of our findings – both metaphorically and, perhaps, with a hotdog in hand – let us savor the intriguing journey that brought us to this remarkable correlation. After all, in the words of my favorite punster, "It's not just about casting ballots; it's about casting condiments on a hotdog too!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Connecticut and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Correlating Connecticut's Democrat Votes with Devouring Dogs: A Curious Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing relationship between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing numerical data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia, our research team engaged in a thorough analysis, unearthing a compelling connection that is sure to raise eyebrows and appetites. We uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9171163 and p < 0.01, spanning the years from 1979 to 2020.

The findings reveal a significant positive correlation between the number of votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the quantity of hotdogs devoured by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. It appears that as one increases, so does the other, leading to the tantalizing conclusion that political preferences may have a direct impact on the propensity for indulging in delectable, sodium-laden sausages on a grand stage. As dad would say, "Looks like these hotdogs really cut the mustard when it comes to predicting election outcomes!"

This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the social and culinary influences that underlie the voting behavior in Connecticut. The implications of our findings may extend beyond the realm of electoral analysis, shedding new light on the intricate interplay between democratic choices and gastronomic tendencies. As we venture down this peculiar research avenue, one thing is certain – the wieners have it, and so does democracy!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2015) explored the uncharted territory of electoral data analysis, delving into the nuances of voter behavior in the state of Connecticut. Their rigorous statistical approach uncovered patterns that shed light on the political landscape of this region. Meanwhile, Jones et al. (2018) embarked on a culinary odyssey, documenting the feats of champions in competitive eating events. These endeavors provide a crucial foundation for our investigation into the curious connection between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.
As we consider the peculiar correlation between these variables, it is worth noting the potential implications it may have on our understanding of political engagement and gustatory excess. As the famous saying goes, “Why was the math book sad? Because it had too many problems.” Similarly, our research aims to uncover the underlying problems and provide a mathematical narrative that intertwines political preferences with the consumption of hotdogs.
Drawing from seminal texts like “Hot Dogs: A Global History” by Bruce Kraig and “American Political Parties and Elections: A Very Short Introduction” by L. Sandy Maisel, we begin to appreciate the historical, cultural, and political contexts that underpin both the act of casting votes and the devouring of hotdogs. These literary works offer a comprehensive foundation for our exploration, allowing us to contextualize the curious correlation within the broader spectrum of human behavior and social phenomena.
In addition to these scholarly works, we cannot overlook the insightful fiction novels that, whether by design or coincidence, touch upon the themes of politics and gastronomy. J.K. Rowling's "The Order of the Hotdog" adds a whimsical layer to our understanding, as it likely resonates with the wizardry required to comprehend the enigmatic connection we are endeavoring to unravel. Furthermore, George Orwell's "Animal Farm" serves as a poignant allegory, reminding us that “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others” – a sentiment that may reverberate in our examination of voting and hotdog consumption patterns.
Exploring modern mediums of communication, popular memes such as the “Biden Eating Ice Cream” series and the “Hotdog Cat” meme illuminate the complexities of intertwining political figures and culinary delights. These cultural phenomena serve as curious mirror images of our own investigation, compelling us to ponder the surreal intersections between the serious realm of politics and the more light-hearted world of internet humor.
In sum, the literature surrounding our research topic provides a rich tapestry of insights, weaving together historical, cultural, and fictional narratives that bear relevance to our curious correlation. By synthesizing these diverse sources, we aim to navigate the labyrinth of political and gastronomic associations, drawing ever closer to untangling the savory enigma that has captured our scholarly appetites. As the dust jacket from Dr. Seuss' "Green Eggs and Ham" posits, “Try them, try them, and you may! Try them and you may, I say.” With that spirit of conviction, we march forward into the realm of academic inquiry, poised to savor the intellectual feast that awaits.

[[RESULTS]]
In scrutinizing the electoral landscape and the world of competitive eating, we unearthed a remarkable correlation between the number of votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9171163, indicating a strong positive relationship.
The r-squared value of 0.8411024 further underscores the robustness of the correlation, suggesting that approximately 84% of the variance in hotdog consumption by the Nathan's champion can be explained by the number of Democrat votes in Connecticut. It's as if the votes are not just shaping the political landscape, but also the gastronomic one – a true feat of "wein-gineering," if you will!
The p-value of less than 0.01 highlights the statistical significance of our findings, firmly cementing the connection between political preferences and the propensity to devour copious amounts of hotdogs. It seems that amidst the fierce battles for electoral victory, a separate battle is being waged – a battle of the buns, ketchup, and mustard, where the victor emerges not through votes but through a display of jaw-dropping competitive eating prowess.
Our findings are encapsulated in Fig. 1, a scatterplot illustrating the tight clustering of data points, affirming the strong positive correlation between the two variables. It's as if each hotdog eaten by the champion represents a vote of sorts, an edible endorsement of the political choices made in the Nutmeg State.
As our research into this unlikely intersection of democratic votes and hotdog consumption unfolds, it becomes increasingly evident that a nuanced relationship underpins this correlation. The implications of these findings stretch beyond the realm of empirical analysis, infusing a touch of whimsy and wonder into the seemingly separate domains of politics and competitive eating.
In uncovering this unexpected connection, we invite our readers to ponder the implications of this correlation and embrace the delightful absurdity inherent in these seemingly incongruent phenomena. As we digest the implications of our findings – both metaphorically and, perhaps, with a hotdog in hand – let us savor the intriguing journey that brought us to this remarkable correlation. After all, in the words of my favorite punster, "It's not just about casting ballots; it's about casting condiments on a hotdog too!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have illuminated a surprising connection between the consumption of hotdogs by the victor of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition and the number of votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut. This unexpected correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9171163, underscores the tantalizing relationship between electoral choices and indulgence in sodium-laden sausages. It seems that political preferences may indeed exert a palpable influence on the proclivity for voracious hotdog consumption. As the saying goes, "the wurst-case scenario may just be a win-win situation for hotdog enthusiasts and political pundits alike!"

Building on the seminal work of Smith and Doe (2015), our results affirm and extend their insights into voter behavior in Connecticut. The robust correlation we have observed aligns with their uncovering of patterns that shed light on the political landscape of the state. It is as if the statistical trends between votes and hotdog consumption offer a palatable narrative of democracy in action, where the popular vote and the "popular dog" converge in an unexpected gastronomic crescendo.

Likewise, our findings harmonize with the culinary odyssey embarked upon by Jones et al. (2018), who documented the feats of champions in competitive eating events. The striking correlation we have unearthed provides a quantitative validation of their qualitative observations, as if to say that the competitive eating arena serves as a mirror reflection of the electoral stage, where victors emerge based on the quantity of consumed hotdogs as well as the number of political endorsements garnered. One might even jest that in the world of competitive eating, "it's not just about casting ballots; it's about casting condiments on a hotdog too!"

Evidently, our results have brought to light a correlation that defies traditional expectations, bespeaking a curious interplay between political choices and culinary indulgence. The piquant implications of this connection extend beyond the boundaries of electoral analysis, casting a delectable light on the intersection of democratic preferences and gustatory delights. It seems that in the kaleidoscope of human behavior, the act of casting votes and the act of consuming hotdogs share an unexpectedly harmonious resonance, like the familiar refrain of a catchy tune that one cannot help but hum along to.

As we savor the savory implications of this unexpected correlation, it becomes apparent that the profundity of human behavior continues to surprise and titillate in delightful ways. It prompts us to delve deeper into the intricacies of our choices and appetites, reminding us that the whimsy of statistical analysis may hold secrets as unexpected and satisfying as the first bite of a perfectly grilled hotdog. In the words of my favorite jokester, "These findings are nothing to relish lightly; they deserve to be mustard over with careful consideration, and perhaps a side of sauerkraut!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Connecticut and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Correlating Connecticut's Democrat Votes with Devouring Dogs: A Curious Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing relationship between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing numerical data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia, our research team engaged in a thorough analysis, unearthing a compelling connection that is sure to raise eyebrows and appetites. We uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9171163 and p < 0.01, spanning the years from 1979 to 2020.

The findings reveal a significant positive correlation between the number of votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the quantity of hotdogs devoured by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. It appears that as one increases, so does the other, leading to the tantalizing conclusion that political preferences may have a direct impact on the propensity for indulging in delectable, sodium-laden sausages on a grand stage. As dad would say, "Looks like these hotdogs really cut the mustard when it comes to predicting election outcomes!"

This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the social and culinary influences that underlie the voting behavior in Connecticut. The implications of our findings may extend beyond the realm of electoral analysis, shedding new light on the intricate interplay between democratic choices and gastronomic tendencies. As we venture down this peculiar research avenue, one thing is certain – the wieners have it, and so does democracy!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Buckle up, dear readers, as we embark on a journey that will not only tantalize your taste buds but also challenge conventional wisdom in the realm of electoral analysis. Who would have thought that the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the devouring of hotdogs could be connected in a way that defies logic and tickles the senses? The correlation uncovered in this study could only be described as "frankly" surprising!
Throughout the years, Connecticut has been a battleground for political ideologies, with the Democratic candidate garnering remarkable support from the Nutmeg State. Meanwhile, in the realm of competitive eating, the annual Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has seen champions inhaling an astonishing number of hotdogs within a limited timeframe. One might jest that these competitors are truly "relishing" the opportunity to showcase their talents.
The foundation of this study rests on the theory that electoral preferences may extend beyond the confines of the ballot box and manifest in unexpected arenas – in this case, competitive eating. Who would have thought that the nuances of political inclinations could find expression in the consumption of hotdogs? It seems the saying "you are what you eat" takes on a whole new meaning in this context. As my dear old dad likes to quip, "Looks like these hotdogs can vote with their feet – by marching straight into someone's stomach!"
As we delve into the peculiar correlation between these seemingly disparate elements, it becomes clear that there might be more at play than mere happenstance. The statistical analysis reveals a strong positive correlation between the votes cast for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the number of hotdogs devoured by the Nathan's champion. This correlation compels us to question the interplay between political predispositions and gustatory indulgence. It's almost as if the hotdogs themselves are casting a vote for the dinner table!
With these initial findings, we stand at the precipice of uncovering a connection that challenges traditional paradigms and invites further exploration into the depths of culinary and political interrelationships. As we continue our journey, driven by an insatiable curiosity and perhaps a craving for both empirical evidence and a good hotdog, we invite you to join us in unraveling the enigmatic ties between democratic votes and hotdog consumption in Connecticut. After all, in this curious correlation, the proof is not just in the pudding, but in the mustard, relish, and ketchup as well!

[[RESULTS]]
In scrutinizing the electoral landscape and the world of competitive eating, we unearthed a remarkable correlation between the number of votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9171163, indicating a strong positive relationship.
The r-squared value of 0.8411024 further underscores the robustness of the correlation, suggesting that approximately 84% of the variance in hotdog consumption by the Nathan's champion can be explained by the number of Democrat votes in Connecticut. It's as if the votes are not just shaping the political landscape, but also the gastronomic one – a true feat of "wein-gineering," if you will!
The p-value of less than 0.01 highlights the statistical significance of our findings, firmly cementing the connection between political preferences and the propensity to devour copious amounts of hotdogs. It seems that amidst the fierce battles for electoral victory, a separate battle is being waged – a battle of the buns, ketchup, and mustard, where the victor emerges not through votes but through a display of jaw-dropping competitive eating prowess.
Our findings are encapsulated in Fig. 1, a scatterplot illustrating the tight clustering of data points, affirming the strong positive correlation between the two variables. It's as if each hotdog eaten by the champion represents a vote of sorts, an edible endorsement of the political choices made in the Nutmeg State.
As our research into this unlikely intersection of democratic votes and hotdog consumption unfolds, it becomes increasingly evident that a nuanced relationship underpins this correlation. The implications of these findings stretch beyond the realm of empirical analysis, infusing a touch of whimsy and wonder into the seemingly separate domains of politics and competitive eating.
In uncovering this unexpected connection, we invite our readers to ponder the implications of this correlation and embrace the delightful absurdity inherent in these seemingly incongruent phenomena. As we digest the implications of our findings – both metaphorically and, perhaps, with a hotdog in hand – let us savor the intriguing journey that brought us to this remarkable correlation. After all, in the words of my favorite punster, "It's not just about casting ballots; it's about casting condiments on a hotdog too!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has shed light on the unexpected yet tantalizing correlation between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the consumption of hotdogs by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The statistically significant positive relationship, as evidenced by the robust correlation coefficient and p-value, suggests a curious intertwining of political preferences and gustatory indulgence. It seems that in Connecticut, the saying "you are what you eat" takes on a whole new meaning – perhaps it's not just about political leanings, but also about the leanings of a loaded hotdog! As the saying goes, "Hotdogs and ballots have more in common than meets the buns!"

With our findings, we have not only unveiled an intriguing correlation but also ignited a sizzling debate on the potential societal and cultural implications of this unorthodox connection. It appears that the hotdog champion's feats mirror the democratic voice of the Nutmeg State, as if every hotdog consumed is a metaphorical vote for the delicious union of politics and hotdogs. As dad would quip, "Looks like those hotdogs have a real appetite for democracy!"

Therefore, on this flavorful note, we boldly assert that no further research is needed in this area. Our study stands as a testament to the delightful idiosyncrasies of human behavior and the unforeseen intersections between seemingly unrelated domains. In the whimsical world of democratic votes and hotdog consumption, the proof is not just in the pudding but also in the relish, mustard, and ketchup. With that, we bid farewell to this absurdly delectable research journey that has left us both informed and hungry for more – both for knowledge and, quite possibly, for hotdogs! After all, in this curious correlation, it's not just about the results; it's about the "relish-ionships" we've formed along the way!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Correlating Connecticut's Democrat Votes with Devouring Dogs: A Curious Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Political Science


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Correlating Connecticut's Democrat Votes with Devouring Dogs: A Curious Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Dialectical Society for Canine Electoral Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Correlating Connecticut's Democrat Votes with Devouring Dogs: A Curious Connection with an abstract of This paper delves into the intriguing relationship between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing numerical data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia, our research team engaged in a thorough analysis, unearthing a compelling connection that is sure to raise eyebrows and appetites. We uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9171163 and p < 0.01, spanning the years from 1979 to 2020.
The findings reveal a significant positive correlation between the number of votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Connecticut and the quantity of hotdogs devoured by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. It appears that as one increases, so does the other, leading to the tantalizing conclusion that political preferences may have a direct impact on the propensity for indulging in delectable, sodium-laden sausages on a grand stage. As dad would say, "Looks like these hotdogs really cut the mustard when it comes to predicting election outcomes!"
This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the social and culinary influences that underlie the voting behavior in Connecticut. The implications of our findings may extend beyond the realm of electoral analysis, shedding new light on the intricate interplay between democratic choices and gastronomic tendencies. As we venture down this peculiar research avenue, one thing is certain – the wieners have it, and so does democracy!

ChatGPT:

Connecticut, Democrat votes, hotdogs, Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, correlation, electoral analysis, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Wikipedia, voting behavior, gastronomic tendencies, social influences

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Connecticut
Detailed data title: Total votes cast for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Connecticut
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Connecticut

Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Detailed data title: Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

Correlation r = 0.9171163 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8411024 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Connecticut) over the 11 years from 1979 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.05E-5. 0.0000704970996325702700000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 0.00705% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 14,185 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.71, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19801984198819921996200020042008201220162020
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Connecticut (Total votes)5417325695976765846823187357408160158574889977729050838975721080830
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion (Hotdogs eaten)9.59.5101922.252553.3359687075




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([541732,569597,676584,682318,735740,816015,857488,997772,905083,897572,1080830,])
array_2 = np.array([9.5,9.5,10,19,22.25,25,53.33,59,68,70,75,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Connecticut"
array_2_name = "Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 4524 · Black Variable ID: 25959 · Red Variable ID: 500
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0