about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,443 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Delaware and the second variable is Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more people showed support for the Libertarian candidate, there was a greater push for freedom - even in the automotive world. This led to a loosening of standards and a laissez-faire attitude towards parking brake regulations. You could say it put the "brakes" on traditional expectations! Remember, these explanations are purely for entertainment!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a realistic image of a sunlit suburban street, where a sleek car adorned with campaign signs for the Libertarian Presidential candidate drives confidently through the scene. The car proudly displays a "Libertarian for President" bumper sticker. Meanwhile, multiple other vehicles are parked at the side of the road, with their hazard lights on, signaling parking brake issues. The intersecting themes of political support and automotive safety concerns are captured in this visual, showcasing a relaxed and free-spirited atmosphere as the campaign-style car cruises past the parked vehicles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Delaware and Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Symbolism Scalar art Cubism Surrealism Realistic
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Delaware and Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake, in the following situation: As more people showed support for the Libertarian candidate, there was a greater push for freedom - even in the automotive world. This led to a loosening of standards and a laissez-faire attitude towards parking brake regulations. You could say it put the "brakes" on traditional expectations! Remember, these explanations are purely for entertainment!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Delaware, people eagerly cast their votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate, while in the automotive world, parking brake recalls seemed to be on the rise. Picture a campaign-sign adorned car with a "Libertarian for President" bumper sticker confidently cruising down the road, as multiple cars are seen pulled over due to parking brake issues. The scene embodies a push for freedom and a relaxed approach to parking brake regulations, visually representing the intersection of political support and automotive safety concerns.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In Delaware, people eagerly cast their votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate, while in the automotive world, parking brake recalls seemed to be on the rise. Picture a campaign-sign adorned car with a "Libertarian for President" bumper sticker confidently cruising down the road, as multiple cars are seen pulled over due to parking brake issues. The scene embodies a push for freedom and a relaxed approach to parking brake regulations, visually representing the intersection of political support and automotive safety concerns. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a realistic image of a sunlit suburban street, where a sleek car adorned with campaign signs for the Libertarian Presidential candidate drives confidently through the scene. The car proudly displays a "Libertarian for President" bumper sticker. Meanwhile, multiple other vehicles are parked at the side of the road, with their hazard lights on, signaling parking brake issues. The intersecting themes of political support and automotive safety concerns are captured in this visual, showcasing a relaxed and free-spirited atmosphere as the campaign-style car cruises past the parked vehicles.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Delaware positively influenced Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Brake-ing the Pattern: The Correlation Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Delaware and Automotive Recalls for Issues with the Parking Brake

Journal of Quirky Societal Correlations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Delaware and Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9284432 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Brake-ing the Pattern: The Correlation Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Delaware and Automotive Recalls for Issues with the Parking Brake

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the unexpected relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, we sought to explore this curiously connected phenomenon. Analyzing a time frame from 1980 to 2020, our research team identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9284432 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables.

"Dad, did you hear about the car with a mind of its own? It had a parking break!"

The findings of this study not only highlight the surprising association between libertarian voting patterns and parking brake recalls but also raise intriguing questions about the potential underlying factors driving this correlation. The implications of these results extend far beyond the realm of automotive safety and political behavior, challenging conventional assumptions about seemingly disparate domains and underscoring the importance of interdisciplinary investigation.

"Why did the parking brake go to therapy? It had too much tension!"

In conclusion, the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake presents a captivating subject for further research and underscores the need to explore unexpected connections in diverse domains. These findings may not only capture the imagination but also inspire future investigations into the quirky interplay of political preferences and vehicular safety concerns.

"Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything, just like this unexpected correlation!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Delaware and Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Brake-ing the Pattern: The Correlation Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Delaware and Automotive Recalls for Issues with the Parking Brake

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the unexpected relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, we sought to explore this curiously connected phenomenon. Analyzing a time frame from 1980 to 2020, our research team identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9284432 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables.

"Dad, did you hear about the car with a mind of its own? It had a parking break!"

The findings of this study not only highlight the surprising association between libertarian voting patterns and parking brake recalls but also raise intriguing questions about the potential underlying factors driving this correlation. The implications of these results extend far beyond the realm of automotive safety and political behavior, challenging conventional assumptions about seemingly disparate domains and underscoring the importance of interdisciplinary investigation.

"Why did the parking brake go to therapy? It had too much tension!"

In conclusion, the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake presents a captivating subject for further research and underscores the need to explore unexpected connections in diverse domains. These findings may not only capture the imagination but also inspire future investigations into the quirky interplay of political preferences and vehicular safety concerns.

"Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything, just like this unexpected correlation!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between political behavior and automotive safety is not typically a topic of extensive inquiry. However, in the spirit of exploring unexpected connections, this study ventures into the uncharted territory of the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. "What do you call a fake parking brake? A faux paw!" Despite the initial amusement it might provoke, this peculiar association warrants serious investigation.

Over the past few decades, the notion of political choices impacting vehicular safety might have seemed as far-fetched as finding a parking spot in a crowded lot on a Monday morning. Yet, "Why was the math book sad? It had too many problems," this seemingly improbable correlation has compelled our research team to delve into extensive datasets and statistical analysis to unearth the underlying dynamics at play.

Our study is motivated not only by the desire to bring a touch of light-hearted curiosity into the academic arena but also by the genuine quest to unravel the intriguing interplay between political voting patterns and automotive engineering oversights. "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug." In a similar vein, this research endeavors to embrace the unexpected and the unusual, seeking to shed light on the unexplored nexus of political affiliations and parking brake malfunctions.

As we embark on this unconventional exploration, it is important to adopt a mindset that is open to surprises and unconventional revelations. "I wasn't originally going to get a brain transplant, but then I changed my mind." By maintaining a flexible and inquisitive perspective, we aim to challenge the status quo and spark thought-provoking conversations within the academic community and beyond.

With this introduction, we invite readers to join us in the intellectual adventure that lies ahead, as we unravel the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. "What did the stoplight say to the car? Don't look, I'm changing!" In doing so, we hope to not only illuminate an unforeseen connection but also inject a sense of levity and wonder into the world of scholarly inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Delaware and Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Brake-ing the Pattern: The Correlation Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Delaware and Automotive Recalls for Issues with the Parking Brake

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the unexpected relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, we sought to explore this curiously connected phenomenon. Analyzing a time frame from 1980 to 2020, our research team identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9284432 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables.

"Dad, did you hear about the car with a mind of its own? It had a parking break!"

The findings of this study not only highlight the surprising association between libertarian voting patterns and parking brake recalls but also raise intriguing questions about the potential underlying factors driving this correlation. The implications of these results extend far beyond the realm of automotive safety and political behavior, challenging conventional assumptions about seemingly disparate domains and underscoring the importance of interdisciplinary investigation.

"Why did the parking brake go to therapy? It had too much tension!"

In conclusion, the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake presents a captivating subject for further research and underscores the need to explore unexpected connections in diverse domains. These findings may not only capture the imagination but also inspire future investigations into the quirky interplay of political preferences and vehicular safety concerns.

"Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything, just like this unexpected correlation!"

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between political behavior and automotive safety is not typically a topic of extensive inquiry. However, in the spirit of exploring unexpected connections, this study ventures into the uncharted territory of the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. "What do you call a fake parking brake? A faux paw!" Despite the initial amusement it might provoke, this peculiar association warrants serious investigation.
Over the past few decades, the notion of political choices impacting vehicular safety might have seemed as far-fetched as finding a parking spot in a crowded lot on a Monday morning. Yet, "Why was the math book sad? It had too many problems," this seemingly improbable correlation has compelled our research team to delve into extensive datasets and statistical analysis to unearth the underlying dynamics at play.
Our study is motivated not only by the desire to bring a touch of light-hearted curiosity into the academic arena but also by the genuine quest to unravel the intriguing interplay between political voting patterns and automotive engineering oversights. "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug." In a similar vein, this research endeavors to embrace the unexpected and the unusual, seeking to shed light on the unexplored nexus of political affiliations and parking brake malfunctions.
As we embark on this unconventional exploration, it is important to adopt a mindset that is open to surprises and unconventional revelations. "I wasn't originally going to get a brain transplant, but then I changed my mind." By maintaining a flexible and inquisitive perspective, we aim to challenge the status quo and spark thought-provoking conversations within the academic community and beyond.
With this introduction, we invite readers to join us in the intellectual adventure that lies ahead, as we unravel the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. "What did the stoplight say to the car? Don't look, I'm changing!" In doing so, we hope to not only illuminate an unforeseen connection but also inject a sense of levity and wonder into the world of scholarly inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith and Doe (2015)," the authors find that political voting patterns can have unexpected correlations with seemingly unrelated phenomena, echoing the sentiment that politics makes strange bedfellows. The study portrays the interplay between political behaviors and unanticipated outcomes, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake.

In a similarly thoughtful exploration, "Jones (2017)" delves into the realm of automotive engineering oversights and unforeseen relationships, shedding light on the complexities of vehicular safety concerns and their potential link to political preferences. This seminal work paves the way for our analysis, showcasing the value of examining unconventional connections in seemingly disparate domains.

"Isaacson (2019)" presents a fascinating account of engineering marvels and their unintended consequences, contemplating the repercussions of human ingenuity and the unforeseen ripple effects of technological advancements. While not specifically focused on political voting patterns, the book kindles a sense of wonder about the serendipitous interplay of human actions and their unintended outcomes, raising thought-provoking questions about the unexpected correlations that permeate our world.

Transitioning from non-fiction literature to the realm of fiction, "Murakami (2002)" weaves a tale of surreal connections and inexplicable phenomena, inviting readers into a world where the ordinary intertwines with the extraordinary. While not directly related to automotive safety or political voting patterns, the essence of unpredictability and the unexpected undercurrents in Murakami's work resonate with the spirit of our investigation, urging us to embrace the enigmatic and the unforeseen.

Likewise, "Palahniuk (1996)" explores the unconventional and the unanticipated, delving into the depths of human idiosyncrasies and the peculiarities of everyday life. Although situated in the realm of fiction, Palahniuk's narratives exude an aura of unpredictability and offbeat connections, mirroring the essence of our inquiry into the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake.

In a cinematic context, films such as "Back to the Future" and "The Fast and the Furious" series blur the boundaries between ordinary existence and unexpected adventures, encapsulating the thrill of unexpected encounters and unanticipated twists. While not directly addressing the correlation between political voting patterns and automotive recalls, these movies offer a glimpse into the unpredictable and the unconventional, embodying the spirit of our quest to unravel the surprising nexus between seemingly unrelated variables.

The convergence of diverse literary and cinematic sources underscores the captivating nature of unexpected connections and the allure of delving into unconventional correlations. By encompassing a spectrum of non-fiction and fiction works alongside cinematic representations, our literature review not only extends the scholarly discourse but also injects a sense of playful exploration into the investigation of the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake.

"Why did the car's report card look so good? Because it had high 'brake'demic achievements!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Delaware and Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT . You used data from 1980 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Brake-ing the Pattern: The Correlation Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Delaware and Automotive Recalls for Issues with the Parking Brake

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the unexpected relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, we sought to explore this curiously connected phenomenon. Analyzing a time frame from 1980 to 2020, our research team identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9284432 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables.

"Dad, did you hear about the car with a mind of its own? It had a parking break!"

The findings of this study not only highlight the surprising association between libertarian voting patterns and parking brake recalls but also raise intriguing questions about the potential underlying factors driving this correlation. The implications of these results extend far beyond the realm of automotive safety and political behavior, challenging conventional assumptions about seemingly disparate domains and underscoring the importance of interdisciplinary investigation.

"Why did the parking brake go to therapy? It had too much tension!"

In conclusion, the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake presents a captivating subject for further research and underscores the need to explore unexpected connections in diverse domains. These findings may not only capture the imagination but also inspire future investigations into the quirky interplay of political preferences and vehicular safety concerns.

"Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything, just like this unexpected correlation!"

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between political behavior and automotive safety is not typically a topic of extensive inquiry. However, in the spirit of exploring unexpected connections, this study ventures into the uncharted territory of the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. "What do you call a fake parking brake? A faux paw!" Despite the initial amusement it might provoke, this peculiar association warrants serious investigation.
Over the past few decades, the notion of political choices impacting vehicular safety might have seemed as far-fetched as finding a parking spot in a crowded lot on a Monday morning. Yet, "Why was the math book sad? It had too many problems," this seemingly improbable correlation has compelled our research team to delve into extensive datasets and statistical analysis to unearth the underlying dynamics at play.
Our study is motivated not only by the desire to bring a touch of light-hearted curiosity into the academic arena but also by the genuine quest to unravel the intriguing interplay between political voting patterns and automotive engineering oversights. "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug." In a similar vein, this research endeavors to embrace the unexpected and the unusual, seeking to shed light on the unexplored nexus of political affiliations and parking brake malfunctions.
As we embark on this unconventional exploration, it is important to adopt a mindset that is open to surprises and unconventional revelations. "I wasn't originally going to get a brain transplant, but then I changed my mind." By maintaining a flexible and inquisitive perspective, we aim to challenge the status quo and spark thought-provoking conversations within the academic community and beyond.
With this introduction, we invite readers to join us in the intellectual adventure that lies ahead, as we unravel the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. "What did the stoplight say to the car? Don't look, I'm changing!" In doing so, we hope to not only illuminate an unforeseen connection but also inject a sense of levity and wonder into the world of scholarly inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the curious correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake, our research team employed a meticulously crafted methodology, akin to performing an intricate automotive repair. We collected data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, utilizing a time frame spanning from 1980 to 2020, allowing us to analyze long-term trends in both political preferences and automotive safety concerns.

To begin this unconventional inquiry, we developed a convoluted algorithm akin to a multi-step dance routine, combining data extraction, cleaning, and transformation procedures. By integrating these intricate maneuvers, we ensured the meticulous assembly of our dataset, much like the intricate inner workings of a high-performance vehicle.

Next, to identify the correlation between libertarian voting patterns and parking brake recalls, we employed a statistical approach as sophisticated as a hybrid engine, utilizing Pearson correlation analysis. This method allowed us to quantitatively assess the strength and direction of the relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, providing a robust evaluation like a thorough inspection at an automotive service center.

Subsequently, engaging in a comparative analysis reminiscent of test-driving various vehicles, we cross-referenced the electoral data with automotive recall records, carefully examining the electoral outcomes against the timing and frequency of parking brake-related recalls. This comprehensive investigation enabled us to discern patterns and trends with the precision of a seasoned mechanic diagnosing vehicular malfunctions.

Furthermore, to complement our quantitative analysis, we conducted qualitative inquiries, engaging in extensive literature review akin to exploring the archives of an automotive museum. This process involved examining scholarly publications, industry reports, and expert commentaries to deepen our understanding of the potential factors underlying the unexpected correlation. Through this intricate exploration, we sought to unveil the underlying mechanisms driving this peculiar relationship, akin to dismantling a complex automotive component to reveal its inner workings.

Finally, in alignment with the rigorous standards of academic research, we subjected our findings to thorough scrutiny and robustness checks, analogous to comprehensive quality assurance tests conducted in the automotive industry. This meticulous validation process ensured the reliability and validity of our results, akin to confirming the safety and functionality of critical vehicular systems.

In the spirit of our light-hearted approach, we acknowledge the unexpected nature of our investigation and hope that our innovative methodologies and findings contribute to a sense of intellectual curiosity, much like stumbling upon an amusing bumper sticker on a long drive.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Delaware and Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT .

For the time period 1980 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9284432, r-squared of 0.8620068, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Brake-ing the Pattern: The Correlation Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Delaware and Automotive Recalls for Issues with the Parking Brake

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the unexpected relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, we sought to explore this curiously connected phenomenon. Analyzing a time frame from 1980 to 2020, our research team identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9284432 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables.

"Dad, did you hear about the car with a mind of its own? It had a parking break!"

The findings of this study not only highlight the surprising association between libertarian voting patterns and parking brake recalls but also raise intriguing questions about the potential underlying factors driving this correlation. The implications of these results extend far beyond the realm of automotive safety and political behavior, challenging conventional assumptions about seemingly disparate domains and underscoring the importance of interdisciplinary investigation.

"Why did the parking brake go to therapy? It had too much tension!"

In conclusion, the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake presents a captivating subject for further research and underscores the need to explore unexpected connections in diverse domains. These findings may not only capture the imagination but also inspire future investigations into the quirky interplay of political preferences and vehicular safety concerns.

"Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything, just like this unexpected correlation!"

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between political behavior and automotive safety is not typically a topic of extensive inquiry. However, in the spirit of exploring unexpected connections, this study ventures into the uncharted territory of the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. "What do you call a fake parking brake? A faux paw!" Despite the initial amusement it might provoke, this peculiar association warrants serious investigation.
Over the past few decades, the notion of political choices impacting vehicular safety might have seemed as far-fetched as finding a parking spot in a crowded lot on a Monday morning. Yet, "Why was the math book sad? It had too many problems," this seemingly improbable correlation has compelled our research team to delve into extensive datasets and statistical analysis to unearth the underlying dynamics at play.
Our study is motivated not only by the desire to bring a touch of light-hearted curiosity into the academic arena but also by the genuine quest to unravel the intriguing interplay between political voting patterns and automotive engineering oversights. "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug." In a similar vein, this research endeavors to embrace the unexpected and the unusual, seeking to shed light on the unexplored nexus of political affiliations and parking brake malfunctions.
As we embark on this unconventional exploration, it is important to adopt a mindset that is open to surprises and unconventional revelations. "I wasn't originally going to get a brain transplant, but then I changed my mind." By maintaining a flexible and inquisitive perspective, we aim to challenge the status quo and spark thought-provoking conversations within the academic community and beyond.
With this introduction, we invite readers to join us in the intellectual adventure that lies ahead, as we unravel the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. "What did the stoplight say to the car? Don't look, I'm changing!" In doing so, we hope to not only illuminate an unforeseen connection but also inject a sense of levity and wonder into the world of scholarly inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT revealed a striking correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. This unexpected connection prompted our research team to unleash a flurry of statistical tests and analyses, culminating in a correlation coefficient of 0.9284432, an r-squared value of 0.8620068, and a p-value of less than 0.01.

The correlation coefficient of 0.9284432 underscores the strong positive relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. This robust association challenges traditional expectations and invites further scrutiny into the underlying mechanisms driving this peculiar correlation.

"It's shocking how closely these two seemingly unrelated variables are tied together, much like a car to its parking brake!"

Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.8620068 suggests that approximately 86.20% of the variability in automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake can be explained by the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware. This substantial proportion of explained variance lends further credence to the influence of political preferences on vehicular safety concerns.

It's clear that there's more to parking brake recalls than meets the eye, much like a car traveling downhill with a faulty parking brake – it's all downhill from there!

The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant, further reinforcing the solidity of the discovered relationship. This significance level dismisses the possibility that the observed association is due to random chance and provides compelling evidence in support of a genuine connection between these seemingly disparate variables.

In conclusion, our investigation has unveiled a compelling link between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake, opening the door to a realm of unanticipated connections and thought-provoking inquiries.

"Who knew that parking brake recalls and political votes could be such close companions? It's a political and mechanical marriage made in statistical heaven!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Delaware and Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Brake-ing the Pattern: The Correlation Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Delaware and Automotive Recalls for Issues with the Parking Brake

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the unexpected relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, we sought to explore this curiously connected phenomenon. Analyzing a time frame from 1980 to 2020, our research team identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9284432 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables.

"Dad, did you hear about the car with a mind of its own? It had a parking break!"

The findings of this study not only highlight the surprising association between libertarian voting patterns and parking brake recalls but also raise intriguing questions about the potential underlying factors driving this correlation. The implications of these results extend far beyond the realm of automotive safety and political behavior, challenging conventional assumptions about seemingly disparate domains and underscoring the importance of interdisciplinary investigation.

"Why did the parking brake go to therapy? It had too much tension!"

In conclusion, the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake presents a captivating subject for further research and underscores the need to explore unexpected connections in diverse domains. These findings may not only capture the imagination but also inspire future investigations into the quirky interplay of political preferences and vehicular safety concerns.

"Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything, just like this unexpected correlation!"

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith and Doe (2015)," the authors find that political voting patterns can have unexpected correlations with seemingly unrelated phenomena, echoing the sentiment that politics makes strange bedfellows. The study portrays the interplay between political behaviors and unanticipated outcomes, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake.
In a similarly thoughtful exploration, "Jones (2017)" delves into the realm of automotive engineering oversights and unforeseen relationships, shedding light on the complexities of vehicular safety concerns and their potential link to political preferences. This seminal work paves the way for our analysis, showcasing the value of examining unconventional connections in seemingly disparate domains.
"Isaacson (2019)" presents a fascinating account of engineering marvels and their unintended consequences, contemplating the repercussions of human ingenuity and the unforeseen ripple effects of technological advancements. While not specifically focused on political voting patterns, the book kindles a sense of wonder about the serendipitous interplay of human actions and their unintended outcomes, raising thought-provoking questions about the unexpected correlations that permeate our world.
Transitioning from non-fiction literature to the realm of fiction, "Murakami (2002)" weaves a tale of surreal connections and inexplicable phenomena, inviting readers into a world where the ordinary intertwines with the extraordinary. While not directly related to automotive safety or political voting patterns, the essence of unpredictability and the unexpected undercurrents in Murakami's work resonate with the spirit of our investigation, urging us to embrace the enigmatic and the unforeseen.
Likewise, "Palahniuk (1996)" explores the unconventional and the unanticipated, delving into the depths of human idiosyncrasies and the peculiarities of everyday life. Although situated in the realm of fiction, Palahniuk's narratives exude an aura of unpredictability and offbeat connections, mirroring the essence of our inquiry into the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake.
In a cinematic context, films such as "Back to the Future" and "The Fast and the Furious" series blur the boundaries between ordinary existence and unexpected adventures, encapsulating the thrill of unexpected encounters and unanticipated twists. While not directly addressing the correlation between political voting patterns and automotive recalls, these movies offer a glimpse into the unpredictable and the unconventional, embodying the spirit of our quest to unravel the surprising nexus between seemingly unrelated variables.
The convergence of diverse literary and cinematic sources underscores the captivating nature of unexpected connections and the allure of delving into unconventional correlations. By encompassing a spectrum of non-fiction and fiction works alongside cinematic representations, our literature review not only extends the scholarly discourse but also injects a sense of playful exploration into the investigation of the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake.
"Why did the car's report card look so good? Because it had high 'brake'demic achievements!"

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT revealed a striking correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. This unexpected connection prompted our research team to unleash a flurry of statistical tests and analyses, culminating in a correlation coefficient of 0.9284432, an r-squared value of 0.8620068, and a p-value of less than 0.01.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9284432 underscores the strong positive relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. This robust association challenges traditional expectations and invites further scrutiny into the underlying mechanisms driving this peculiar correlation.
"It's shocking how closely these two seemingly unrelated variables are tied together, much like a car to its parking brake!"
Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.8620068 suggests that approximately 86.20% of the variability in automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake can be explained by the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware. This substantial proportion of explained variance lends further credence to the influence of political preferences on vehicular safety concerns.
It's clear that there's more to parking brake recalls than meets the eye, much like a car traveling downhill with a faulty parking brake – it's all downhill from there!
The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant, further reinforcing the solidity of the discovered relationship. This significance level dismisses the possibility that the observed association is due to random chance and provides compelling evidence in support of a genuine connection between these seemingly disparate variables.
In conclusion, our investigation has unveiled a compelling link between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake, opening the door to a realm of unanticipated connections and thought-provoking inquiries.
"Who knew that parking brake recalls and political votes could be such close companions? It's a political and mechanical marriage made in statistical heaven!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The unexpected connection between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake is a phenomenon that challenges conventional assumptions and beckons researchers to delve into the enigmatic interplay of seemingly unrelated variables.

The correlation identified in our study not only aligns with prior research by Smith and Doe (2015) and Jones (2017), who illuminated the unexpected connections between political behaviors and automotive oversights, but also echoes the sentiments of conventional wisdom that politics does indeed make strange bedfellows. Much like a political discussion veering into unexpected territory, this correlation offers a surprising twist that evokes laughter and lends itself to an intriguing exploration of the interplay between political preferences and vehicular safety concerns.

In a manner reminiscent of Isaacson's (2019) contemplation of unintended consequences stemming from human ingenuity and technological advancements, our findings underscore the serendipitous nature of the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. Thus, just as a complex engineering marvel may produce unforeseen ripple effects, the entwined relationship between political voting patterns and automotive safety opens the door to a journey of discovery through the unexpected labyrinth of societal interconnections.

Moreover, the influence of Palahniuk's (1996) offbeat narratives and the whimsical spirit of fictional encounters in movies such as "Back to the Future" and "The Fast and the Furious" finds resonance in the unexpected alliance between political voting patterns and automotive recalls. This correlation injects an element of playfulness and unleashes a sense of curiosity akin to unanticipated twists in popular culture, inviting a spirit of lighthearted inquiry into the captivating interplay of seemingly divergent domains.

Our results not only confirm the robust association between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake but also tantalize the imagination with the prospect of further unraveling the mystery behind this unique correlation. As the discussion unfolds and the journey continues, the interdisciplinary nature of this investigation beckons researchers to embrace the unexpected and embark on an expedition into the uncharted territories of interwoven complexities.

In summary, the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake bridges the realms of political preferences and vehicular safety, epitomizing the intricate tapestry of unexpected connections that permeates the fabric of our world. This captivating insight sparks a flame of curiosity and inspires future investigations into the whimsical interplay of seemingly unrelated phenomena, beckoning researchers to embrace the enigmatic and embark on a journey of interdisciplinary exploration.

"Why did the parking brake go to therapy? It had too much tension! After this unexpected correlation, it might need some counseling too!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Delaware and Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Brake-ing the Pattern: The Correlation Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Delaware and Automotive Recalls for Issues with the Parking Brake

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the unexpected relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, we sought to explore this curiously connected phenomenon. Analyzing a time frame from 1980 to 2020, our research team identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9284432 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables.

"Dad, did you hear about the car with a mind of its own? It had a parking break!"

The findings of this study not only highlight the surprising association between libertarian voting patterns and parking brake recalls but also raise intriguing questions about the potential underlying factors driving this correlation. The implications of these results extend far beyond the realm of automotive safety and political behavior, challenging conventional assumptions about seemingly disparate domains and underscoring the importance of interdisciplinary investigation.

"Why did the parking brake go to therapy? It had too much tension!"

In conclusion, the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake presents a captivating subject for further research and underscores the need to explore unexpected connections in diverse domains. These findings may not only capture the imagination but also inspire future investigations into the quirky interplay of political preferences and vehicular safety concerns.

"Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything, just like this unexpected correlation!"

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between political behavior and automotive safety is not typically a topic of extensive inquiry. However, in the spirit of exploring unexpected connections, this study ventures into the uncharted territory of the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. "What do you call a fake parking brake? A faux paw!" Despite the initial amusement it might provoke, this peculiar association warrants serious investigation.
Over the past few decades, the notion of political choices impacting vehicular safety might have seemed as far-fetched as finding a parking spot in a crowded lot on a Monday morning. Yet, "Why was the math book sad? It had too many problems," this seemingly improbable correlation has compelled our research team to delve into extensive datasets and statistical analysis to unearth the underlying dynamics at play.
Our study is motivated not only by the desire to bring a touch of light-hearted curiosity into the academic arena but also by the genuine quest to unravel the intriguing interplay between political voting patterns and automotive engineering oversights. "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug." In a similar vein, this research endeavors to embrace the unexpected and the unusual, seeking to shed light on the unexplored nexus of political affiliations and parking brake malfunctions.
As we embark on this unconventional exploration, it is important to adopt a mindset that is open to surprises and unconventional revelations. "I wasn't originally going to get a brain transplant, but then I changed my mind." By maintaining a flexible and inquisitive perspective, we aim to challenge the status quo and spark thought-provoking conversations within the academic community and beyond.
With this introduction, we invite readers to join us in the intellectual adventure that lies ahead, as we unravel the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. "What did the stoplight say to the car? Don't look, I'm changing!" In doing so, we hope to not only illuminate an unforeseen connection but also inject a sense of levity and wonder into the world of scholarly inquiry.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT revealed a striking correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. This unexpected connection prompted our research team to unleash a flurry of statistical tests and analyses, culminating in a correlation coefficient of 0.9284432, an r-squared value of 0.8620068, and a p-value of less than 0.01.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9284432 underscores the strong positive relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. This robust association challenges traditional expectations and invites further scrutiny into the underlying mechanisms driving this peculiar correlation.
"It's shocking how closely these two seemingly unrelated variables are tied together, much like a car to its parking brake!"
Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.8620068 suggests that approximately 86.20% of the variability in automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake can be explained by the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware. This substantial proportion of explained variance lends further credence to the influence of political preferences on vehicular safety concerns.
It's clear that there's more to parking brake recalls than meets the eye, much like a car traveling downhill with a faulty parking brake – it's all downhill from there!
The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant, further reinforcing the solidity of the discovered relationship. This significance level dismisses the possibility that the observed association is due to random chance and provides compelling evidence in support of a genuine connection between these seemingly disparate variables.
In conclusion, our investigation has unveiled a compelling link between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake, opening the door to a realm of unanticipated connections and thought-provoking inquiries.
"Who knew that parking brake recalls and political votes could be such close companions? It's a political and mechanical marriage made in statistical heaven!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

The correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake presents a captivating subject for further research. This unexpected connection defies conventional wisdom and invites interdisciplinary inquiry into the interplay of political preferences and vehicular safety concerns.

"Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears!"

While the statistical analyses have underscored the robustness of this correlation, it is essential to acknowledge the limitations of observational research. The unexplored factors and potential mechanisms behind this association beckon future studies to shed light on this enigmatic relationship. "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug."

The unexpected nature of this correlation not only captures the imagination but also challenges researchers to think outside the box and embrace the unusual associations that may lie beneath the surface.

"What did the stoplight say to the car? Don't look, I'm changing!"

In light of the intriguing findings presented in this study, it is evident that no further research is needed in this area. The unexpected correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake provides a delightful conclusion to this scholarly exploration, leaving researchers and readers alike with a newfound appreciation for the unexpected connections that may lurk within the realms of political behavior and vehicular safety.

"I couldn't figure out how to fasten my seatbelt. Then it clicked."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Brake-ing the Pattern: The Correlation Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Delaware and Automotive Recalls for Issues with the Parking Brake. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Quirky Societal Correlations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Brake-ing the Pattern: The Correlation Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Delaware and Automotive Recalls for Issues with the Parking Brake. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Statistical Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Brake-ing the Pattern: The Correlation Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Delaware and Automotive Recalls for Issues with the Parking Brake with an abstract of This study examines the unexpected relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, we sought to explore this curiously connected phenomenon. Analyzing a time frame from 1980 to 2020, our research team identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9284432 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables.
"Dad, did you hear about the car with a mind of its own? It had a parking break!"
The findings of this study not only highlight the surprising association between libertarian voting patterns and parking brake recalls but also raise intriguing questions about the potential underlying factors driving this correlation. The implications of these results extend far beyond the realm of automotive safety and political behavior, challenging conventional assumptions about seemingly disparate domains and underscoring the importance of interdisciplinary investigation.
"Why did the parking brake go to therapy? It had too much tension!"
In conclusion, the correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Delaware and automotive recalls for issues with the parking brake presents a captivating subject for further research and underscores the need to explore unexpected connections in diverse domains. These findings may not only capture the imagination but also inspire future investigations into the quirky interplay of political preferences and vehicular safety concerns.
"Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything, just like this unexpected correlation!

ChatGPT:

libertarian presidential candidate, Delaware, automotive recalls, parking brake, correlation, US DOT data, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, political behavior, interdisciplinary investigation, vehicular safety concerns, unexpected connections, correlation coefficient, significance level, p-value, research implications, interdisciplinary research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Delaware
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Delaware
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Delaware

Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake

Correlation r = 0.9284432 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8620068 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 86.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Delaware) over the 10 years from 1980 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.000105. 0.0001051459267148583500000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 0.0105% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 9,511 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.72, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1980198819921996200020042008201220162020
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Delaware (Percentage of votes)0.8376190.4650030.3228370.7577270.2363150.1561880.2689060.937933.341790.991383
Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake (Recalls)521666872810




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.837619,0.465003,0.322837,0.757727,0.236315,0.156188,0.268906,0.93793,3.34179,0.991383,])
array_2 = np.array([5,2,1,6,6,6,8,7,28,10,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Delaware"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 4443 · Black Variable ID: 26071 · Red Variable ID: 1113
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0