about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,409 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and the second variable is Jet fuel used in Albania.  The chart goes from 1993 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As support for the Republican candidate soared in New Mexico, it created a 'political airwave' effect. This, in turn, led to an unexpected surge in enthusiasm for air travel in Albania, driving up the demand for jet fuel. It seems like even from that distance, the Republican candidate's campaign managed to really 'ignite' something in Albania's skies!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a surrealistic landscape featuring a bustling polling station in New Mexico, where a fervent crowd is seen casting their votes for the Republican Presidential candidate. The air is charged with electric energy as waves of excitement reverberate through the scene. In the backdrop, envision a vivid portrayal of Albania's skies with airplanes taking off and landing in rapid succession, symbolizing the surge in demand for jet fuel. The entire setting should be imbued with a cyber art aesthetic, and the connection between the political fervor in New Mexico and the bustling aviation activity in Albania should be visually evident. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and Jet fuel used in Albania. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A scene from Skyrim a Polaroid photo Data cyber art Voxel art Surrealism
ChatGPT: Data cyber art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and Jet fuel used in Albania, in the following situation: As support for the Republican candidate soared in New Mexico, it created a 'political airwave' effect. This, in turn, led to an unexpected surge in enthusiasm for air travel in Albania, driving up the demand for jet fuel. It seems like even from that distance, the Republican candidate's campaign managed to really 'ignite' something in Albania's skies!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In New Mexico, a large crowd gathers at a polling station, with many people casting their Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate. The excitement in the air is palpable as the support for the candidate spreads like an energetic wave. Meanwhile, in Albania, airplanes take off and land constantly, with the demand for Jet fuel surging. The skies over Albania seem to be ablaze with activity, all sparked by the political fervor in New Mexico.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Data cyber art ] and depicting this scene: In New Mexico, a large crowd gathers at a polling station, with many people casting their Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate. The excitement in the air is palpable as the support for the candidate spreads like an energetic wave. Meanwhile, in Albania, airplanes take off and land constantly, with the demand for Jet fuel surging. The skies over Albania seem to be ablaze with activity, all sparked by the political fervor in New Mexico. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a surrealistic landscape featuring a bustling polling station in New Mexico, where a fervent crowd is seen casting their votes for the Republican Presidential candidate. The air is charged with electric energy as waves of excitement reverberate through the scene. In the backdrop, envision a vivid portrayal of Albania's skies with airplanes taking off and landing in rapid succession, symbolizing the surge in demand for jet fuel. The entire setting should be imbued with a cyber art aesthetic, and the connection between the political fervor in New Mexico and the bustling aviation activity in Albania should be visually evident.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico positively influenced Jet fuel used in Albania. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Jetting to the Ballot Box: The Surprising Connection Between Republican Votes in New Mexico and Jet Fuel Consumption in Albania

The International Journal of Unlikely Correlations

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and Jet fuel used in Albania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9505218 and p < 0.01 for 1993 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Jetting to the Ballot Box: The Surprising Connection Between Republican Votes in New Mexico and Jet Fuel Consumption in Albania"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on a truly wild intellectual journey to unravel the perplexing relationship between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and the jet fuel consumption in Albania. We've all heard about swing states, but could it be that jet-set states also have an impact on election outcomes? Is there an airborne influence on political preferences? Strap in for a thrilling ride as we navigate through statistical analysis and data on political leanings and aviation fuel usage.

By harnessing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted rigorous analysis and discovered a rather surprising correlation. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9505218 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 1993 to 2020. Yes, you read that right – a correlation nearly as tight as a plane's boarding process.

Not to mention, the implications of this correlation are simply flying off the charts. Could it be that higher jet fuel usage in Albania somehow influences the voting behavior of New Mexicans towards the Republican candidate? Could it be a case of "fueling" political preferences from thousands of miles away? With such high statistical significance, it seems that there's more to this jet fuel-votes relationship than meets the eye.

In conclusion, our findings suggest a potential link between the consumption of jet fuel in Albania and the voting patterns in New Mexico. This unexpected correlation calls for further investigation, challenging us to rethink the ways in which seemingly unrelated factors may be intertwined in the complex tapestry of political dynamics. And of course, if nothing else, it certainly adds a touch of high-flying intrigue to the world of political science.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and Jet fuel used in Albania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Jetting to the Ballot Box: The Surprising Connection Between Republican Votes in New Mexico and Jet Fuel Consumption in Albania"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on a truly wild intellectual journey to unravel the perplexing relationship between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and the jet fuel consumption in Albania. We've all heard about swing states, but could it be that jet-set states also have an impact on election outcomes? Is there an airborne influence on political preferences? Strap in for a thrilling ride as we navigate through statistical analysis and data on political leanings and aviation fuel usage.

By harnessing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted rigorous analysis and discovered a rather surprising correlation. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9505218 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 1993 to 2020. Yes, you read that right – a correlation nearly as tight as a plane's boarding process.

Not to mention, the implications of this correlation are simply flying off the charts. Could it be that higher jet fuel usage in Albania somehow influences the voting behavior of New Mexicans towards the Republican candidate? Could it be a case of "fueling" political preferences from thousands of miles away? With such high statistical significance, it seems that there's more to this jet fuel-votes relationship than meets the eye.

In conclusion, our findings suggest a potential link between the consumption of jet fuel in Albania and the voting patterns in New Mexico. This unexpected correlation calls for further investigation, challenging us to rethink the ways in which seemingly unrelated factors may be intertwined in the complex tapestry of political dynamics. And of course, if nothing else, it certainly adds a touch of high-flying intrigue to the world of political science.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of political science is often filled with surprising connections and unexpected relationships. From the influence of social media algorithms on voter behavior to the impact of economic policies on electoral outcomes, researchers are constantly uncovering intricate links that shape the political landscape. However, in the realm of astonishing associations, perhaps none are as breathtaking as the connection between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and the jet fuel consumption in Albania.

As we embark on this intellectual escapade, we must first acknowledge the sheer audacity of exploring such a seemingly disparate pair of variables. After all, at first glance, the idea of New Mexican voters being swayed by the kerosene-burning activities in the distant skies of Albania may evoke more incredulous expressions than a magician's sleight of hand.

Nonetheless, armed with statistical rigor and a dash of unyielding curiosity, we set out to challenge conventional wisdom and bring to light the unexpected interplay between political preferences and aviation fuel usage. If this research endeavor seems as improbable as a penguin attempting to earn its pilot's license, fear not – for the results we've uncovered are as eye-opening as a sunrise seen from 30,000 feet.

Strap in for a turbulent ride through data analysis, as we navigate through the mysterious realms of political leanings, transcontinental transportation, and statistical significance. By harnessing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we aimed to unravel the enigma behind this peculiar correlation.

And what did we uncover, you ask? Well, dear reader, prepare to be as astonished as a traveler finding an unanticipated upgrade to first-class. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient so snug, it would put the seating arrangements in an overbooked flight to shame – a remarkable 0.9505218, paired with a p-value that's smaller than the legroom on economy class.

But enough suspense – let's not keep you waiting like a delayed departure. Our analysis from 1993 to 2020 illuminated an unexpected relationship, leaving us to ponder whether jet fuel usage in Albania possesses the gravitas to flutter the political sentiments of New Mexicans towards the Republican candidate.

Surely, this revelation might seem as bewildering as a misplaced carry-on bag turning up in a different country, but the empirical evidence speaks for itself. With such a resounding statistical significance, it appears that there's more than meets the eye (or the sky) in this jet fuel-votes connection.

As we proceed, let us not only revel in the amusement of this unexpected correlation but also contemplate the profound implications it carries. Could it be that the airborne influence of jet fuel consumption across continents leaves an indelible mark on the ballot boxes of New Mexico? Or perhaps, it's a case of political inclinations being "fueled" by unseen forces from above.

In the annals of political science, this curious coupling of seemingly unrelated factors adds an exhilarating twist to the intricate tapestry of electoral dynamics. And so, with a gentle nudge of humor and a profound sense of wonder, we invite you to join us on this academic odyssey – where the relationships between jet fuel and votes prove to be as captivating as a captivating in-flight movie.

In conclusion, our findings hint at a potentially overlooked link between the consumption of jet fuel in Albania and the voting patterns in New Mexico. The implications of this unexpected correlation beckon us to delve deeper, challenging preconceived notions and igniting a renaissance of curiosity within the academia of political science. So fasten your seatbelts, dear reader, for the skies of statistical inquiry and whimsical wonderment await us.

And, as we soar through the realms of academic inquiry, remember – in the world of research, sometimes the most intriguing discoveries are found in the unlikeliest of places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and Jet fuel used in Albania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Jetting to the Ballot Box: The Surprising Connection Between Republican Votes in New Mexico and Jet Fuel Consumption in Albania"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on a truly wild intellectual journey to unravel the perplexing relationship between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and the jet fuel consumption in Albania. We've all heard about swing states, but could it be that jet-set states also have an impact on election outcomes? Is there an airborne influence on political preferences? Strap in for a thrilling ride as we navigate through statistical analysis and data on political leanings and aviation fuel usage.

By harnessing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted rigorous analysis and discovered a rather surprising correlation. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9505218 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 1993 to 2020. Yes, you read that right – a correlation nearly as tight as a plane's boarding process.

Not to mention, the implications of this correlation are simply flying off the charts. Could it be that higher jet fuel usage in Albania somehow influences the voting behavior of New Mexicans towards the Republican candidate? Could it be a case of "fueling" political preferences from thousands of miles away? With such high statistical significance, it seems that there's more to this jet fuel-votes relationship than meets the eye.

In conclusion, our findings suggest a potential link between the consumption of jet fuel in Albania and the voting patterns in New Mexico. This unexpected correlation calls for further investigation, challenging us to rethink the ways in which seemingly unrelated factors may be intertwined in the complex tapestry of political dynamics. And of course, if nothing else, it certainly adds a touch of high-flying intrigue to the world of political science.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of political science is often filled with surprising connections and unexpected relationships. From the influence of social media algorithms on voter behavior to the impact of economic policies on electoral outcomes, researchers are constantly uncovering intricate links that shape the political landscape. However, in the realm of astonishing associations, perhaps none are as breathtaking as the connection between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and the jet fuel consumption in Albania.
As we embark on this intellectual escapade, we must first acknowledge the sheer audacity of exploring such a seemingly disparate pair of variables. After all, at first glance, the idea of New Mexican voters being swayed by the kerosene-burning activities in the distant skies of Albania may evoke more incredulous expressions than a magician's sleight of hand.
Nonetheless, armed with statistical rigor and a dash of unyielding curiosity, we set out to challenge conventional wisdom and bring to light the unexpected interplay between political preferences and aviation fuel usage. If this research endeavor seems as improbable as a penguin attempting to earn its pilot's license, fear not – for the results we've uncovered are as eye-opening as a sunrise seen from 30,000 feet.
Strap in for a turbulent ride through data analysis, as we navigate through the mysterious realms of political leanings, transcontinental transportation, and statistical significance. By harnessing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we aimed to unravel the enigma behind this peculiar correlation.
And what did we uncover, you ask? Well, dear reader, prepare to be as astonished as a traveler finding an unanticipated upgrade to first-class. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient so snug, it would put the seating arrangements in an overbooked flight to shame – a remarkable 0.9505218, paired with a p-value that's smaller than the legroom on economy class.
But enough suspense – let's not keep you waiting like a delayed departure. Our analysis from 1993 to 2020 illuminated an unexpected relationship, leaving us to ponder whether jet fuel usage in Albania possesses the gravitas to flutter the political sentiments of New Mexicans towards the Republican candidate.
Surely, this revelation might seem as bewildering as a misplaced carry-on bag turning up in a different country, but the empirical evidence speaks for itself. With such a resounding statistical significance, it appears that there's more than meets the eye (or the sky) in this jet fuel-votes connection.
As we proceed, let us not only revel in the amusement of this unexpected correlation but also contemplate the profound implications it carries. Could it be that the airborne influence of jet fuel consumption across continents leaves an indelible mark on the ballot boxes of New Mexico? Or perhaps, it's a case of political inclinations being "fueled" by unseen forces from above.
In the annals of political science, this curious coupling of seemingly unrelated factors adds an exhilarating twist to the intricate tapestry of electoral dynamics. And so, with a gentle nudge of humor and a profound sense of wonder, we invite you to join us on this academic odyssey – where the relationships between jet fuel and votes prove to be as captivating as a captivating in-flight movie.
In conclusion, our findings hint at a potentially overlooked link between the consumption of jet fuel in Albania and the voting patterns in New Mexico. The implications of this unexpected correlation beckon us to delve deeper, challenging preconceived notions and igniting a renaissance of curiosity within the academia of political science. So fasten your seatbelts, dear reader, for the skies of statistical inquiry and whimsical wonderment await us.
And, as we soar through the realms of academic inquiry, remember – in the world of research, sometimes the most intriguing discoveries are found in the unlikeliest of places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Jetting to the Polls: Exploring the Nexus Between Air Travel and Political Affiliations" by Smith et al., the authors find a surprising association between jet fuel consumption in distant countries and the voting behavior of individuals in the United States. Building upon this departure from conventional political factors, Doe et al. also delve into the intriguing world of transcontinental influence, uncovering a correlation that's more unusual than finding a flight attendant with a fear of flying.

Furthermore, Jones' research in "Aviation and Electoral Dynamics: From Propellers to Preferences" highlights the previously unexplored connection between aviation fuel usage and political inclinations. These studies lay the groundwork for our investigation, propelling us into the high-flying realm of statistical inquiry and electoral whimsy.

Expanding beyond the traditional political science literature, we turn to non-fiction works such as "Sky High: The Global Impact of Aviation Fuel" by Aviation Analysts International and "Fueling the Future: A Comprehensive Guide to Jet Fuel Usage" by Energy Excellence Enterprises. These publications provide valuable insights into the intricate web of aviation fuel consumption, offering a glimpse into the potential transnational effects that reach further than a Boeing 747's wingspan.

Shifting gears to the realm of fiction, books like "Cloud Atlas" by David Mitchell and "The Airborne Alphabet" by Fictional Flier explore the notion of airborne influences and interconnected destinies, echoing the complexity of our own findings. These literary works, while not grounded in empirical research, spark the imagination and remind us that truth can sometimes be stranger than fiction – and perhaps as unpredictable as turbulence during a thunderstorm.

Not content with stopping at traditional academic sources, we sought inspiration from a variety of unconventional outlets, including the enigmatic musings of fortune cookies, the cryptic messages of Ouija boards, and even the thought-provoking blurbs on the backs of shampoo bottles. While their direct relevance may be as elusive as a missing pair of socks in a suitcase, these peculiar sources reminded us of the boundless creativity that underpins the pursuit of knowledge. After all, who's to say that a stroke of inspiration can't be found in the most unexpected of places?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and Jet fuel used in Albania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1993 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Jetting to the Ballot Box: The Surprising Connection Between Republican Votes in New Mexico and Jet Fuel Consumption in Albania"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on a truly wild intellectual journey to unravel the perplexing relationship between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and the jet fuel consumption in Albania. We've all heard about swing states, but could it be that jet-set states also have an impact on election outcomes? Is there an airborne influence on political preferences? Strap in for a thrilling ride as we navigate through statistical analysis and data on political leanings and aviation fuel usage.

By harnessing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted rigorous analysis and discovered a rather surprising correlation. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9505218 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 1993 to 2020. Yes, you read that right – a correlation nearly as tight as a plane's boarding process.

Not to mention, the implications of this correlation are simply flying off the charts. Could it be that higher jet fuel usage in Albania somehow influences the voting behavior of New Mexicans towards the Republican candidate? Could it be a case of "fueling" political preferences from thousands of miles away? With such high statistical significance, it seems that there's more to this jet fuel-votes relationship than meets the eye.

In conclusion, our findings suggest a potential link between the consumption of jet fuel in Albania and the voting patterns in New Mexico. This unexpected correlation calls for further investigation, challenging us to rethink the ways in which seemingly unrelated factors may be intertwined in the complex tapestry of political dynamics. And of course, if nothing else, it certainly adds a touch of high-flying intrigue to the world of political science.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of political science is often filled with surprising connections and unexpected relationships. From the influence of social media algorithms on voter behavior to the impact of economic policies on electoral outcomes, researchers are constantly uncovering intricate links that shape the political landscape. However, in the realm of astonishing associations, perhaps none are as breathtaking as the connection between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and the jet fuel consumption in Albania.
As we embark on this intellectual escapade, we must first acknowledge the sheer audacity of exploring such a seemingly disparate pair of variables. After all, at first glance, the idea of New Mexican voters being swayed by the kerosene-burning activities in the distant skies of Albania may evoke more incredulous expressions than a magician's sleight of hand.
Nonetheless, armed with statistical rigor and a dash of unyielding curiosity, we set out to challenge conventional wisdom and bring to light the unexpected interplay between political preferences and aviation fuel usage. If this research endeavor seems as improbable as a penguin attempting to earn its pilot's license, fear not – for the results we've uncovered are as eye-opening as a sunrise seen from 30,000 feet.
Strap in for a turbulent ride through data analysis, as we navigate through the mysterious realms of political leanings, transcontinental transportation, and statistical significance. By harnessing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we aimed to unravel the enigma behind this peculiar correlation.
And what did we uncover, you ask? Well, dear reader, prepare to be as astonished as a traveler finding an unanticipated upgrade to first-class. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient so snug, it would put the seating arrangements in an overbooked flight to shame – a remarkable 0.9505218, paired with a p-value that's smaller than the legroom on economy class.
But enough suspense – let's not keep you waiting like a delayed departure. Our analysis from 1993 to 2020 illuminated an unexpected relationship, leaving us to ponder whether jet fuel usage in Albania possesses the gravitas to flutter the political sentiments of New Mexicans towards the Republican candidate.
Surely, this revelation might seem as bewildering as a misplaced carry-on bag turning up in a different country, but the empirical evidence speaks for itself. With such a resounding statistical significance, it appears that there's more than meets the eye (or the sky) in this jet fuel-votes connection.
As we proceed, let us not only revel in the amusement of this unexpected correlation but also contemplate the profound implications it carries. Could it be that the airborne influence of jet fuel consumption across continents leaves an indelible mark on the ballot boxes of New Mexico? Or perhaps, it's a case of political inclinations being "fueled" by unseen forces from above.
In the annals of political science, this curious coupling of seemingly unrelated factors adds an exhilarating twist to the intricate tapestry of electoral dynamics. And so, with a gentle nudge of humor and a profound sense of wonder, we invite you to join us on this academic odyssey – where the relationships between jet fuel and votes prove to be as captivating as a captivating in-flight movie.
In conclusion, our findings hint at a potentially overlooked link between the consumption of jet fuel in Albania and the voting patterns in New Mexico. The implications of this unexpected correlation beckon us to delve deeper, challenging preconceived notions and igniting a renaissance of curiosity within the academia of political science. So fasten your seatbelts, dear reader, for the skies of statistical inquiry and whimsical wonderment await us.
And, as we soar through the realms of academic inquiry, remember – in the world of research, sometimes the most intriguing discoveries are found in the unlikeliest of places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the mysterious connection between the Republican votes in New Mexico and jet fuel consumption in Albania, our research team embarked on a whirlwind of methodological maneuvers, making sure not to get too dizzy from all the statistical turbulence. Our data collection spanned across various sources, making it feel like we were on a transcontinental scavenger hunt for numbers and figures. We acquired relevant data from reputable sources such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, ensuring that our statistical stewardship was as reliable as the captain of a well-maintained commercial airliner.

Firstly, we knuckled down and collected historical data on the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico from 1993 to 2020. Each vote was meticulously accounted for, giving us a snapshot into the political leanings of the Land of Enchantment. Next, we delved into the world of aviation and secured data on jet fuel consumption in Albania. Like intrepid explorers charting the high skies, we navigated through the Energy Information Administration's data to acquire a comprehensive understanding of Albania's kerosene-burning tendencies.

After gathering these diverse sets of data, we then employed rigorous statistical methods to smooth out the statistical turbulence and uncover any potential connections. We performed correlation analysis using cutting-edge software, ensuring that our statistical calculations were as precise as an air traffic controller guiding a plane to its gate. The correlation coefficient we obtained was so strikingly high that it sent shockwaves through our research team, prompting more double-checking than a passenger making sure they've got the right boarding pass.

Additionally, we conducted a thorough regression analysis to ascertain the strength and direction of the relationship between the Republican votes in New Mexico and jet fuel consumption in Albania. This analytical approach allowed us to ascertain whether the relationship between these variables was as steady as a well-maintained flight path, or if it was as erratic as turbulence on a bumpy flight.

Furthermore, we carefully considered potential confounding variables that could have influenced our findings. We didn't want any extraneous factors to throw our results off course, after all. Finally, we scrutinized the robustness of our findings through sensitivity analysis, ensuring that our results weren't as fragile as airplane wings made of paper.

In conclusion, our methodology was as thorough as a pre-flight safety demonstration, and with our methodological seatbelts securely fastened, we soared through the skies of data analysis, navigating through the uncertain clouds of statistical noise to reveal the unexpected relationship between Republican votes in New Mexico and jet fuel consumption in Albania.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and Jet fuel used in Albania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1993 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9505218, r-squared of 0.9034917, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Jetting to the Ballot Box: The Surprising Connection Between Republican Votes in New Mexico and Jet Fuel Consumption in Albania"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on a truly wild intellectual journey to unravel the perplexing relationship between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and the jet fuel consumption in Albania. We've all heard about swing states, but could it be that jet-set states also have an impact on election outcomes? Is there an airborne influence on political preferences? Strap in for a thrilling ride as we navigate through statistical analysis and data on political leanings and aviation fuel usage.

By harnessing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted rigorous analysis and discovered a rather surprising correlation. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9505218 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 1993 to 2020. Yes, you read that right – a correlation nearly as tight as a plane's boarding process.

Not to mention, the implications of this correlation are simply flying off the charts. Could it be that higher jet fuel usage in Albania somehow influences the voting behavior of New Mexicans towards the Republican candidate? Could it be a case of "fueling" political preferences from thousands of miles away? With such high statistical significance, it seems that there's more to this jet fuel-votes relationship than meets the eye.

In conclusion, our findings suggest a potential link between the consumption of jet fuel in Albania and the voting patterns in New Mexico. This unexpected correlation calls for further investigation, challenging us to rethink the ways in which seemingly unrelated factors may be intertwined in the complex tapestry of political dynamics. And of course, if nothing else, it certainly adds a touch of high-flying intrigue to the world of political science.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of political science is often filled with surprising connections and unexpected relationships. From the influence of social media algorithms on voter behavior to the impact of economic policies on electoral outcomes, researchers are constantly uncovering intricate links that shape the political landscape. However, in the realm of astonishing associations, perhaps none are as breathtaking as the connection between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and the jet fuel consumption in Albania.
As we embark on this intellectual escapade, we must first acknowledge the sheer audacity of exploring such a seemingly disparate pair of variables. After all, at first glance, the idea of New Mexican voters being swayed by the kerosene-burning activities in the distant skies of Albania may evoke more incredulous expressions than a magician's sleight of hand.
Nonetheless, armed with statistical rigor and a dash of unyielding curiosity, we set out to challenge conventional wisdom and bring to light the unexpected interplay between political preferences and aviation fuel usage. If this research endeavor seems as improbable as a penguin attempting to earn its pilot's license, fear not – for the results we've uncovered are as eye-opening as a sunrise seen from 30,000 feet.
Strap in for a turbulent ride through data analysis, as we navigate through the mysterious realms of political leanings, transcontinental transportation, and statistical significance. By harnessing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we aimed to unravel the enigma behind this peculiar correlation.
And what did we uncover, you ask? Well, dear reader, prepare to be as astonished as a traveler finding an unanticipated upgrade to first-class. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient so snug, it would put the seating arrangements in an overbooked flight to shame – a remarkable 0.9505218, paired with a p-value that's smaller than the legroom on economy class.
But enough suspense – let's not keep you waiting like a delayed departure. Our analysis from 1993 to 2020 illuminated an unexpected relationship, leaving us to ponder whether jet fuel usage in Albania possesses the gravitas to flutter the political sentiments of New Mexicans towards the Republican candidate.
Surely, this revelation might seem as bewildering as a misplaced carry-on bag turning up in a different country, but the empirical evidence speaks for itself. With such a resounding statistical significance, it appears that there's more than meets the eye (or the sky) in this jet fuel-votes connection.
As we proceed, let us not only revel in the amusement of this unexpected correlation but also contemplate the profound implications it carries. Could it be that the airborne influence of jet fuel consumption across continents leaves an indelible mark on the ballot boxes of New Mexico? Or perhaps, it's a case of political inclinations being "fueled" by unseen forces from above.
In the annals of political science, this curious coupling of seemingly unrelated factors adds an exhilarating twist to the intricate tapestry of electoral dynamics. And so, with a gentle nudge of humor and a profound sense of wonder, we invite you to join us on this academic odyssey – where the relationships between jet fuel and votes prove to be as captivating as a captivating in-flight movie.
In conclusion, our findings hint at a potentially overlooked link between the consumption of jet fuel in Albania and the voting patterns in New Mexico. The implications of this unexpected correlation beckon us to delve deeper, challenging preconceived notions and igniting a renaissance of curiosity within the academia of political science. So fasten your seatbelts, dear reader, for the skies of statistical inquiry and whimsical wonderment await us.
And, as we soar through the realms of academic inquiry, remember – in the world of research, sometimes the most intriguing discoveries are found in the unlikeliest of places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data analysis revealed a striking correlation between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and the jet fuel consumption in Albania. The correlation coefficient of 0.9505218 suggests a remarkably strong relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables. If this correlation were any tighter, it'd have passengers on a fully booked flight feeling envious.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9034917 indicates that a substantial portion of the variability in Republican votes in New Mexico can be explained by the jet fuel consumption in Albania. This relationship is as clear as a sunny day for takeoff, leaving little room for turbulence in its interpretation.

The p-value of less than 0.01 adds an extra layer of significance to our findings. This p-value is so small, it makes the legroom in economy class feel generous by comparison. Essentially, it points to the exceedingly low likelihood that this correlation is due to random chance. In other words, the probability of this relationship occurring by accident is about as slim as a runway model's chances of becoming an airline pilot.

In Fig. 1, the scatterplot graphically illustrates this robust correlation, with data points tightly clustered around the best-fit line like eager travelers hoping for an upgrade. The visual representation of this relationship is as clear as a pilot's announcement welcoming passengers to their destination.

These results leave us with an intriguing puzzle. Could it be that the soaring usage of jet fuel in Albania somehow influences the political preferences of New Mexicans, akin to a transcontinental political tailwind? This unexpected correlation challenges us to think beyond geographical boundaries and conventional political dynamics, injecting a touch of whimsy into our understanding of electoral influences.

In conclusion, the statistically significant relationship between jet fuel consumption in Albania and votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico invites further exploration and speculation. Our findings demonstrate that in the vast and ever-changing landscape of political science, unexpected connections can emerge from the most unlikely of sources, adding an extra layer of intrigue to the tapestry of electoral dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and Jet fuel used in Albania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Jetting to the Ballot Box: The Surprising Connection Between Republican Votes in New Mexico and Jet Fuel Consumption in Albania"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on a truly wild intellectual journey to unravel the perplexing relationship between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and the jet fuel consumption in Albania. We've all heard about swing states, but could it be that jet-set states also have an impact on election outcomes? Is there an airborne influence on political preferences? Strap in for a thrilling ride as we navigate through statistical analysis and data on political leanings and aviation fuel usage.

By harnessing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted rigorous analysis and discovered a rather surprising correlation. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9505218 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 1993 to 2020. Yes, you read that right – a correlation nearly as tight as a plane's boarding process.

Not to mention, the implications of this correlation are simply flying off the charts. Could it be that higher jet fuel usage in Albania somehow influences the voting behavior of New Mexicans towards the Republican candidate? Could it be a case of "fueling" political preferences from thousands of miles away? With such high statistical significance, it seems that there's more to this jet fuel-votes relationship than meets the eye.

In conclusion, our findings suggest a potential link between the consumption of jet fuel in Albania and the voting patterns in New Mexico. This unexpected correlation calls for further investigation, challenging us to rethink the ways in which seemingly unrelated factors may be intertwined in the complex tapestry of political dynamics. And of course, if nothing else, it certainly adds a touch of high-flying intrigue to the world of political science.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Jetting to the Polls: Exploring the Nexus Between Air Travel and Political Affiliations" by Smith et al., the authors find a surprising association between jet fuel consumption in distant countries and the voting behavior of individuals in the United States. Building upon this departure from conventional political factors, Doe et al. also delve into the intriguing world of transcontinental influence, uncovering a correlation that's more unusual than finding a flight attendant with a fear of flying.
Furthermore, Jones' research in "Aviation and Electoral Dynamics: From Propellers to Preferences" highlights the previously unexplored connection between aviation fuel usage and political inclinations. These studies lay the groundwork for our investigation, propelling us into the high-flying realm of statistical inquiry and electoral whimsy.
Expanding beyond the traditional political science literature, we turn to non-fiction works such as "Sky High: The Global Impact of Aviation Fuel" by Aviation Analysts International and "Fueling the Future: A Comprehensive Guide to Jet Fuel Usage" by Energy Excellence Enterprises. These publications provide valuable insights into the intricate web of aviation fuel consumption, offering a glimpse into the potential transnational effects that reach further than a Boeing 747's wingspan.
Shifting gears to the realm of fiction, books like "Cloud Atlas" by David Mitchell and "The Airborne Alphabet" by Fictional Flier explore the notion of airborne influences and interconnected destinies, echoing the complexity of our own findings. These literary works, while not grounded in empirical research, spark the imagination and remind us that truth can sometimes be stranger than fiction – and perhaps as unpredictable as turbulence during a thunderstorm.
Not content with stopping at traditional academic sources, we sought inspiration from a variety of unconventional outlets, including the enigmatic musings of fortune cookies, the cryptic messages of Ouija boards, and even the thought-provoking blurbs on the backs of shampoo bottles. While their direct relevance may be as elusive as a missing pair of socks in a suitcase, these peculiar sources reminded us of the boundless creativity that underpins the pursuit of knowledge. After all, who's to say that a stroke of inspiration can't be found in the most unexpected of places?

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a striking correlation between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and the jet fuel consumption in Albania. The correlation coefficient of 0.9505218 suggests a remarkably strong relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables. If this correlation were any tighter, it'd have passengers on a fully booked flight feeling envious.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9034917 indicates that a substantial portion of the variability in Republican votes in New Mexico can be explained by the jet fuel consumption in Albania. This relationship is as clear as a sunny day for takeoff, leaving little room for turbulence in its interpretation.
The p-value of less than 0.01 adds an extra layer of significance to our findings. This p-value is so small, it makes the legroom in economy class feel generous by comparison. Essentially, it points to the exceedingly low likelihood that this correlation is due to random chance. In other words, the probability of this relationship occurring by accident is about as slim as a runway model's chances of becoming an airline pilot.
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot graphically illustrates this robust correlation, with data points tightly clustered around the best-fit line like eager travelers hoping for an upgrade. The visual representation of this relationship is as clear as a pilot's announcement welcoming passengers to their destination.
These results leave us with an intriguing puzzle. Could it be that the soaring usage of jet fuel in Albania somehow influences the political preferences of New Mexicans, akin to a transcontinental political tailwind? This unexpected correlation challenges us to think beyond geographical boundaries and conventional political dynamics, injecting a touch of whimsy into our understanding of electoral influences.
In conclusion, the statistically significant relationship between jet fuel consumption in Albania and votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico invites further exploration and speculation. Our findings demonstrate that in the vast and ever-changing landscape of political science, unexpected connections can emerge from the most unlikely of sources, adding an extra layer of intrigue to the tapestry of electoral dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study have left us feeling like we've stumbled upon an unexpected layover in the journey of political research. The robust correlation between Republican votes in New Mexico and jet fuel consumption in Albania speaks to a connection that is as surprising as finding a first-class seat upgrade on a budget airline.

Building upon the work of Smith et al. and Doe et al., who also ventured into the uncharted skies of transcontinental influence, our findings not only support but reach new heights in demonstrating the tantalizing relationship between air travel and political leanings. It's as if our data has taken off on a non-stop flight from hypothesis to statistical significance, with a smooth landing in the realm of electoral dynamics.

In aligning with Jones' research on aviation fuel usage and political inclinations, we've essentially boarded the same intellectual airplane, observing an unforeseen flight path from Albania to New Mexico. The expansiveness of our results is as expansive as the wingspan of the world's largest aircraft, stretching across borders and reshaping our understanding of electoral whimsy.

Drawing from the literary and non-fiction works that inspired our inquiry, such as "Sky High" and "Fueling the Future," we can't help but marvel at the way our empirical findings echo the intricate narratives of airborne influences. It's almost as if our research has taken flight into the pages of these publications, illustrating the interconnectedness of disparate elements in ways that are as unpredictable as turbulence during a thunderstorm.

Expanding beyond the confines of conventional academic sources, we've found ourselves inspired by the unconventional and offbeat, much like a spontaneous vacation to a little-known destination. The playful engagement with fortune cookies, Ouija boards, and shampoo bottle blurbs has reminded us that unexpected sources can serve as a source of whimsical inspiration, akin to stumbling upon a hidden gem during travel.

As we navigate the implications of our results, we're left contemplating the intriguing possibility of a transcontinental political tailwind that transcends geographical boundaries. The high-flying mystery of jet fuel's potential influence on political preferences challenges us to adopt a broader perspective on the interconnectedness of global dynamics and electoral influences.

In the realm of statistical inquiry and electoral whimsy, our findings invite further exploration and inspire a reimagining of the intertwining threads of political science. From the voting booths of New Mexico to the fuel tanks of Albania, our study adds an unexpected layer of intrigue and whimsy to the ever-evolving tapestry of electoral dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and Jet fuel used in Albania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Jetting to the Ballot Box: The Surprising Connection Between Republican Votes in New Mexico and Jet Fuel Consumption in Albania"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on a truly wild intellectual journey to unravel the perplexing relationship between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and the jet fuel consumption in Albania. We've all heard about swing states, but could it be that jet-set states also have an impact on election outcomes? Is there an airborne influence on political preferences? Strap in for a thrilling ride as we navigate through statistical analysis and data on political leanings and aviation fuel usage.

By harnessing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted rigorous analysis and discovered a rather surprising correlation. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9505218 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 1993 to 2020. Yes, you read that right – a correlation nearly as tight as a plane's boarding process.

Not to mention, the implications of this correlation are simply flying off the charts. Could it be that higher jet fuel usage in Albania somehow influences the voting behavior of New Mexicans towards the Republican candidate? Could it be a case of "fueling" political preferences from thousands of miles away? With such high statistical significance, it seems that there's more to this jet fuel-votes relationship than meets the eye.

In conclusion, our findings suggest a potential link between the consumption of jet fuel in Albania and the voting patterns in New Mexico. This unexpected correlation calls for further investigation, challenging us to rethink the ways in which seemingly unrelated factors may be intertwined in the complex tapestry of political dynamics. And of course, if nothing else, it certainly adds a touch of high-flying intrigue to the world of political science.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of political science is often filled with surprising connections and unexpected relationships. From the influence of social media algorithms on voter behavior to the impact of economic policies on electoral outcomes, researchers are constantly uncovering intricate links that shape the political landscape. However, in the realm of astonishing associations, perhaps none are as breathtaking as the connection between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and the jet fuel consumption in Albania.
As we embark on this intellectual escapade, we must first acknowledge the sheer audacity of exploring such a seemingly disparate pair of variables. After all, at first glance, the idea of New Mexican voters being swayed by the kerosene-burning activities in the distant skies of Albania may evoke more incredulous expressions than a magician's sleight of hand.
Nonetheless, armed with statistical rigor and a dash of unyielding curiosity, we set out to challenge conventional wisdom and bring to light the unexpected interplay between political preferences and aviation fuel usage. If this research endeavor seems as improbable as a penguin attempting to earn its pilot's license, fear not – for the results we've uncovered are as eye-opening as a sunrise seen from 30,000 feet.
Strap in for a turbulent ride through data analysis, as we navigate through the mysterious realms of political leanings, transcontinental transportation, and statistical significance. By harnessing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we aimed to unravel the enigma behind this peculiar correlation.
And what did we uncover, you ask? Well, dear reader, prepare to be as astonished as a traveler finding an unanticipated upgrade to first-class. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient so snug, it would put the seating arrangements in an overbooked flight to shame – a remarkable 0.9505218, paired with a p-value that's smaller than the legroom on economy class.
But enough suspense – let's not keep you waiting like a delayed departure. Our analysis from 1993 to 2020 illuminated an unexpected relationship, leaving us to ponder whether jet fuel usage in Albania possesses the gravitas to flutter the political sentiments of New Mexicans towards the Republican candidate.
Surely, this revelation might seem as bewildering as a misplaced carry-on bag turning up in a different country, but the empirical evidence speaks for itself. With such a resounding statistical significance, it appears that there's more than meets the eye (or the sky) in this jet fuel-votes connection.
As we proceed, let us not only revel in the amusement of this unexpected correlation but also contemplate the profound implications it carries. Could it be that the airborne influence of jet fuel consumption across continents leaves an indelible mark on the ballot boxes of New Mexico? Or perhaps, it's a case of political inclinations being "fueled" by unseen forces from above.
In the annals of political science, this curious coupling of seemingly unrelated factors adds an exhilarating twist to the intricate tapestry of electoral dynamics. And so, with a gentle nudge of humor and a profound sense of wonder, we invite you to join us on this academic odyssey – where the relationships between jet fuel and votes prove to be as captivating as a captivating in-flight movie.
In conclusion, our findings hint at a potentially overlooked link between the consumption of jet fuel in Albania and the voting patterns in New Mexico. The implications of this unexpected correlation beckon us to delve deeper, challenging preconceived notions and igniting a renaissance of curiosity within the academia of political science. So fasten your seatbelts, dear reader, for the skies of statistical inquiry and whimsical wonderment await us.
And, as we soar through the realms of academic inquiry, remember – in the world of research, sometimes the most intriguing discoveries are found in the unlikeliest of places.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a striking correlation between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and the jet fuel consumption in Albania. The correlation coefficient of 0.9505218 suggests a remarkably strong relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables. If this correlation were any tighter, it'd have passengers on a fully booked flight feeling envious.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9034917 indicates that a substantial portion of the variability in Republican votes in New Mexico can be explained by the jet fuel consumption in Albania. This relationship is as clear as a sunny day for takeoff, leaving little room for turbulence in its interpretation.
The p-value of less than 0.01 adds an extra layer of significance to our findings. This p-value is so small, it makes the legroom in economy class feel generous by comparison. Essentially, it points to the exceedingly low likelihood that this correlation is due to random chance. In other words, the probability of this relationship occurring by accident is about as slim as a runway model's chances of becoming an airline pilot.
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot graphically illustrates this robust correlation, with data points tightly clustered around the best-fit line like eager travelers hoping for an upgrade. The visual representation of this relationship is as clear as a pilot's announcement welcoming passengers to their destination.
These results leave us with an intriguing puzzle. Could it be that the soaring usage of jet fuel in Albania somehow influences the political preferences of New Mexicans, akin to a transcontinental political tailwind? This unexpected correlation challenges us to think beyond geographical boundaries and conventional political dynamics, injecting a touch of whimsy into our understanding of electoral influences.
In conclusion, the statistically significant relationship between jet fuel consumption in Albania and votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico invites further exploration and speculation. Our findings demonstrate that in the vast and ever-changing landscape of political science, unexpected connections can emerge from the most unlikely of sources, adding an extra layer of intrigue to the tapestry of electoral dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

So there you have it, folks. Did you ever think you'd see a correlation between jet fuel in Albania and Republican votes in New Mexico? It's almost as mind-boggling as finding a lost suitcase in a different country – and just as unexpected!

But in all seriousness (sort of), our findings have uncovered a correlation so tight, it makes an overbooked flight look spacious. The statistical significance of this connection is as clear as a flight attendant's safety demonstration, leaving little room for doubt.

Does this mean that the fumes from Albanian jet fuel are somehow influencing voting preferences in the Land of Enchantment? It's a quirky idea, to be sure, but the data speak for themselves – and yes, they're talking as loudly as a chatty neighbor on a long-haul flight.

So, is there more work to be done in this area? Well, as tempting as it may be to embark on even more high-flying research adventures, our findings suggest there may not be a need. After all, sometimes in academia, as in a well-planned flight, the most unexpected destinations turn out to be the most interesting. And let's face it, the skies of statistical inquiry can only hold so much fuel for whimsical wonderment – until next time, happy landings!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Jetting to the Ballot Box: The Surprising Connection Between Republican Votes in New Mexico and Jet Fuel Consumption in Albania. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Unlikely Correlations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Jetting to the Ballot Box: The Surprising Connection Between Republican Votes in New Mexico and Jet Fuel Consumption in Albania. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Consortium for International Energy and Political Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Jetting to the Ballot Box: The Surprising Connection Between Republican Votes in New Mexico and Jet Fuel Consumption in Albania with an abstract of In this study, we embark on a truly wild intellectual journey to unravel the perplexing relationship between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico and the jet fuel consumption in Albania. We've all heard about swing states, but could it be that jet-set states also have an impact on election outcomes? Is there an airborne influence on political preferences? Strap in for a thrilling ride as we navigate through statistical analysis and data on political leanings and aviation fuel usage.
By harnessing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted rigorous analysis and discovered a rather surprising correlation. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9505218 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 1993 to 2020. Yes, you read that right – a correlation nearly as tight as a plane's boarding process.
Not to mention, the implications of this correlation are simply flying off the charts. Could it be that higher jet fuel usage in Albania somehow influences the voting behavior of New Mexicans towards the Republican candidate? Could it be a case of "fueling" political preferences from thousands of miles away? With such high statistical significance, it seems that there's more to this jet fuel-votes relationship than meets the eye.
In conclusion, our findings suggest a potential link between the consumption of jet fuel in Albania and the voting patterns in New Mexico. This unexpected correlation calls for further investigation, challenging us to rethink the ways in which seemingly unrelated factors may be intertwined in the complex tapestry of political dynamics. And of course, if nothing else, it certainly adds a touch of high-flying intrigue to the world of political science.

ChatGPT:

Republican votes New Mexico, jet fuel consumption Albania, correlation research, political preferences, aviation fuel usage, swing states, political leanings, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Energy Information Administration, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, voting behavior, high statistical significance, jet fuel-votes relationship

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico

Jet fuel used in Albania
Detailed data title: Volume of jet fuel used consumed in Albania in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Jet fuel used in Albania

Correlation r = 0.9505218 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9034917 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 90.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Jet fuel used in Albania) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico) over the 7 years from 1993 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00102. 0.0010183079928383289000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 0.102% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 982 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 6 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 6 because we have two variables measured over a period of 7 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.69, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1996200020042008201220162020
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico (Percentage of votes)41.856147.847449.838441.77942.843340.042543.4967
Jet fuel used in Albania (Million Barrels/Day)0.30.8666671.040.5633330.4333330.1520820.418949




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([41.8561,47.8474,49.8384,41.779,42.8433,40.0425,43.4967,])
array_2 = np.array([0.3,0.866667,1.04,0.563333,0.433333,0.152082,0.418949,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Mexico"
array_2_name = "Jet fuel used in Albania"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 4409 · Black Variable ID: 26141 · Red Variable ID: 24124
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0