about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,321 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts and the second variable is Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air.  The chart goes from 1982 to 2008, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the political call for maximum freedom and minimal government intervention revs up, it seems that even the brakes on cars can't help but follow suit. Could it be that as more voters lean towards Libertarian ideals, the very concept of brakes becomes too restrictive for our vehicles, leading to a sudden need for more recalls on service brakes? It's like the cars are saying, "Don't tread on me or my ability to stop safely!" Remember, when it comes to this correlation, it's a real brake from the norm!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a Massachusetts town with a classic New England building featuring a "Vote Here" sign. In front of the building, a line of voters forms, each person depicted with unique styles and expressions. Adjacent to the voters, visualise a group of people wearing "Libertarian" badges, engaged in enthusiastic conversations. Meanwhile, down the street from the voting scene, depict a local automotive shop with a row of cars awaiting service. At the shop, visualize mechanics diligently working on inspecting and repairing the brakes of the vehicles. The scene should showcase the parallel events, intertwining the political scene with the uptick in automotive recalls, creating a curious link between the two. The town should be lively and bustling, capturing the essence of the unique events and interactions. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyberpunk Steampunk A scene from Skyrim A scene from Skyrim Pop art
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air, in the following situation: As the political call for maximum freedom and minimal government intervention revs up, it seems that even the brakes on cars can't help but follow suit. Could it be that as more voters lean towards Libertarian ideals, the very concept of brakes becomes too restrictive for our vehicles, leading to a sudden need for more recalls on service brakes? It's like the cars are saying, "Don't tread on me or my ability to stop safely!" Remember, when it comes to this correlation, it's a real brake from the norm!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Massachusetts town, a line of voters forms in front of a classic New England building with a "Vote Here" sign. A group of people wearing "Libertarian" badges stands together, chatting enthusiastically. Meanwhile, down the street at the local automotive shop, a row of cars awaits service, and mechanics diligently work on inspecting and repairing the brakes of the vehicles. The parallel scenes seem to hint at a curious link between the political shifts and the uptick in automotive recalls for service brakes.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Massachusetts town, a line of voters forms in front of a classic New England building with a "Vote Here" sign. A group of people wearing "Libertarian" badges stands together, chatting enthusiastically. Meanwhile, down the street at the local automotive shop, a row of cars awaits service, and mechanics diligently work on inspecting and repairing the brakes of the vehicles. The parallel scenes seem to hint at a curious link between the political shifts and the uptick in automotive recalls for service brakes. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a Massachusetts town with a classic New England building featuring a "Vote Here" sign. In front of the building, a line of voters forms, each person depicted with unique styles and expressions. Adjacent to the voters, visualise a group of people wearing "Libertarian" badges, engaged in enthusiastic conversations. Meanwhile, down the street from the voting scene, depict a local automotive shop with a row of cars awaiting service. At the shop, visualize mechanics diligently working on inspecting and repairing the brakes of the vehicles. The scene should showcase the parallel events, intertwining the political scene with the uptick in automotive recalls, creating a curious link between the two. The town should be lively and bustling, capturing the essence of the unique events and interactions.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts positively influenced Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Braking Bad: The Curious Relationship Between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls for Service Brakes, Air

The Journal of Political Wheelies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9961908 and p < 0.01 for 1982 to 2008.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Braking Bad: The Curious Relationship Between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls for Service Brakes, Air

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study scrutinizes the unexpected and, some might say, absurd correlation between the number of votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts and the occurrence of automotive recalls for issues with service brakes, air. By employing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning from 1982 to 2008. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9961908, with a remarkably low p-value of less than 0.01.

It appears that political ideologies may indeed seep into unexpected facets of daily life, much like a sly oil leak in an old jalopy. Who could have anticipated that the voting proclivities of a state known for revolutions and tea parties would dovetail with these automotive malfunctions? This interconnectedness leads one to ponder the underlying dynamics at play, reminiscent of the intricate inner workings of an automotive braking system. Indeed, this research offers a peculiar yet thought-provoking exploration of the intertwined realms of politics and automotive engineering.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Braking Bad: The Curious Relationship Between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls for Service Brakes, Air

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study scrutinizes the unexpected and, some might say, absurd correlation between the number of votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts and the occurrence of automotive recalls for issues with service brakes, air. By employing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning from 1982 to 2008. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9961908, with a remarkably low p-value of less than 0.01.

It appears that political ideologies may indeed seep into unexpected facets of daily life, much like a sly oil leak in an old jalopy. Who could have anticipated that the voting proclivities of a state known for revolutions and tea parties would dovetail with these automotive malfunctions? This interconnectedness leads one to ponder the underlying dynamics at play, reminiscent of the intricate inner workings of an automotive braking system. Indeed, this research offers a peculiar yet thought-provoking exploration of the intertwined realms of politics and automotive engineering.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The relationship between political ideologies and real-world consequences has long been a subject of interest and speculation. From economic policies to social welfare programs, the impact of political beliefs on societal outcomes has been a subject of scholarly inquiry. However, the curious connection between political voting patterns and automotive recalls for service brakes, air, as highlighted in the abstract, presents a unique and somewhat bemusing avenue for investigation. It is as if the gears of the political machine and the gears of the automotive system have inexplicably become entwined, much like a vehicle caught in an unexpected traffic snarl.

The state of Massachusetts, known for its pivotal role in American history and its distinctive political landscape, provides an intriguing backdrop for this examination. The unexpected correlation between the number of votes for Libertarian Senators and the frequency of automotive recalls for service brakes, air raises eyebrows, and not just because of the brisk Bay State winds. How, one may wonder, could the preferences of the electorate in the land of the Boston Tea Party intertwine with the mechanical foibles of vehicles, particularly those pertaining to the crucial braking and air systems? A conundrum indeed, much like trying to diagnose an enigmatic engine noise that persists despite all attempts at repair.

This scholarly investigation seeks to shed light on the enigmatic connection between political inclinations and automotive safety concerns. The findings have the potential to offer a unique perspective, like discovering an unexpected treasure trove in the depths of a cluttered garage. This research aims to engage not only with the academic community but also with automotive and political enthusiasts alike, much like a lively discussion at a bustling intersection. It is our hope that the findings will provoke thought, spark debate, and perhaps even evoke a few wry smiles, much like the unexpected sight of a vintage automobile traversing the city streets.

In light of the unexpected and confounding nature of the correlation, it is essential to delve deeper into the underlying mechanisms and potential implications of this connection. The following sections will rigorously outline the methodology, data sources, and statistical analyses employed to investigate this peculiar association. This exploration seeks not only to unravel the mystery at hand but also to illuminate the intricate interplay between political inclinations and the unforeseen intersections with automotive safety concerns.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Braking Bad: The Curious Relationship Between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls for Service Brakes, Air

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study scrutinizes the unexpected and, some might say, absurd correlation between the number of votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts and the occurrence of automotive recalls for issues with service brakes, air. By employing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning from 1982 to 2008. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9961908, with a remarkably low p-value of less than 0.01.

It appears that political ideologies may indeed seep into unexpected facets of daily life, much like a sly oil leak in an old jalopy. Who could have anticipated that the voting proclivities of a state known for revolutions and tea parties would dovetail with these automotive malfunctions? This interconnectedness leads one to ponder the underlying dynamics at play, reminiscent of the intricate inner workings of an automotive braking system. Indeed, this research offers a peculiar yet thought-provoking exploration of the intertwined realms of politics and automotive engineering.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The relationship between political ideologies and real-world consequences has long been a subject of interest and speculation. From economic policies to social welfare programs, the impact of political beliefs on societal outcomes has been a subject of scholarly inquiry. However, the curious connection between political voting patterns and automotive recalls for service brakes, air, as highlighted in the abstract, presents a unique and somewhat bemusing avenue for investigation. It is as if the gears of the political machine and the gears of the automotive system have inexplicably become entwined, much like a vehicle caught in an unexpected traffic snarl.
The state of Massachusetts, known for its pivotal role in American history and its distinctive political landscape, provides an intriguing backdrop for this examination. The unexpected correlation between the number of votes for Libertarian Senators and the frequency of automotive recalls for service brakes, air raises eyebrows, and not just because of the brisk Bay State winds. How, one may wonder, could the preferences of the electorate in the land of the Boston Tea Party intertwine with the mechanical foibles of vehicles, particularly those pertaining to the crucial braking and air systems? A conundrum indeed, much like trying to diagnose an enigmatic engine noise that persists despite all attempts at repair.
This scholarly investigation seeks to shed light on the enigmatic connection between political inclinations and automotive safety concerns. The findings have the potential to offer a unique perspective, like discovering an unexpected treasure trove in the depths of a cluttered garage. This research aims to engage not only with the academic community but also with automotive and political enthusiasts alike, much like a lively discussion at a bustling intersection. It is our hope that the findings will provoke thought, spark debate, and perhaps even evoke a few wry smiles, much like the unexpected sight of a vintage automobile traversing the city streets.
In light of the unexpected and confounding nature of the correlation, it is essential to delve deeper into the underlying mechanisms and potential implications of this connection. The following sections will rigorously outline the methodology, data sources, and statistical analyses employed to investigate this peculiar association. This exploration seeks not only to unravel the mystery at hand but also to illuminate the intricate interplay between political inclinations and the unforeseen intersections with automotive safety concerns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith, Doe, and Jones (2010) conducted a comprehensive examination of political voting patterns in Massachusetts, shedding light on the nuanced dynamics of the state's electorate. Their work sets the stage for understanding the political landscape in which the curious relationship between Libertarian votes and automotive recalls for service brakes, air unfolds. Furthermore, Johnson and Brown (2015) delved into the intricate workings of automotive safety systems, offering crucial insights into the technical aspects of braking and air mechanisms. These studies provide a solid foundation for exploring the unexpected correlation between seemingly disparate domains.

However, delving into the whimsical and peculiar nature of this correlation, it is only fitting to draw inspiration from a range of eclectic sources. For instance, "Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us" by Daniel H. Pink and "Brake for the Teapot: A Massachusetts Mystery" by Laura Childs offer tangentially related insights into motivation and the quaint New England charm that may inadvertently influence political and automotive spheres.

While these works provide valuable context, it is worth considering the unexpected connections that may lie beneath the surface. Perhaps the unsettling intrigue of "Stephen King's Christine" and the mysterious allure of "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance" by Robert M. Pirsig encapsulate the enigmatic fusion of man and machine, which, in this case, seems to extend to the realm of politics as well.

Additionally, the element of chance and choice, akin to the roll of dice in a board game, cannot be dismissed. Games such as "Formula D" or "Ticket to Ride" may not only evoke images of the open road but also prompt contemplation on the curious twists and turns that underpin the intersection of political affiliations and automotive safety concerns.

In light of these diverse and perhaps unconventional sources of inspiration, the present study aims to unravel the intricate tapestry of influences that shape the correlation between Libertarian votes and automotive recalls for service brakes, air. The following sections will delve into the meticulous methodology and statistical analyses employed, seeking to shed light on this curious confluence of politics and automotive engineering.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT . You used data from 1982 to 2008

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Braking Bad: The Curious Relationship Between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls for Service Brakes, Air

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study scrutinizes the unexpected and, some might say, absurd correlation between the number of votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts and the occurrence of automotive recalls for issues with service brakes, air. By employing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning from 1982 to 2008. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9961908, with a remarkably low p-value of less than 0.01.

It appears that political ideologies may indeed seep into unexpected facets of daily life, much like a sly oil leak in an old jalopy. Who could have anticipated that the voting proclivities of a state known for revolutions and tea parties would dovetail with these automotive malfunctions? This interconnectedness leads one to ponder the underlying dynamics at play, reminiscent of the intricate inner workings of an automotive braking system. Indeed, this research offers a peculiar yet thought-provoking exploration of the intertwined realms of politics and automotive engineering.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The relationship between political ideologies and real-world consequences has long been a subject of interest and speculation. From economic policies to social welfare programs, the impact of political beliefs on societal outcomes has been a subject of scholarly inquiry. However, the curious connection between political voting patterns and automotive recalls for service brakes, air, as highlighted in the abstract, presents a unique and somewhat bemusing avenue for investigation. It is as if the gears of the political machine and the gears of the automotive system have inexplicably become entwined, much like a vehicle caught in an unexpected traffic snarl.
The state of Massachusetts, known for its pivotal role in American history and its distinctive political landscape, provides an intriguing backdrop for this examination. The unexpected correlation between the number of votes for Libertarian Senators and the frequency of automotive recalls for service brakes, air raises eyebrows, and not just because of the brisk Bay State winds. How, one may wonder, could the preferences of the electorate in the land of the Boston Tea Party intertwine with the mechanical foibles of vehicles, particularly those pertaining to the crucial braking and air systems? A conundrum indeed, much like trying to diagnose an enigmatic engine noise that persists despite all attempts at repair.
This scholarly investigation seeks to shed light on the enigmatic connection between political inclinations and automotive safety concerns. The findings have the potential to offer a unique perspective, like discovering an unexpected treasure trove in the depths of a cluttered garage. This research aims to engage not only with the academic community but also with automotive and political enthusiasts alike, much like a lively discussion at a bustling intersection. It is our hope that the findings will provoke thought, spark debate, and perhaps even evoke a few wry smiles, much like the unexpected sight of a vintage automobile traversing the city streets.
In light of the unexpected and confounding nature of the correlation, it is essential to delve deeper into the underlying mechanisms and potential implications of this connection. The following sections will rigorously outline the methodology, data sources, and statistical analyses employed to investigate this peculiar association. This exploration seeks not only to unravel the mystery at hand but also to illuminate the intricate interplay between political inclinations and the unforeseen intersections with automotive safety concerns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The data utilized in this study was obtained from various sources, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation. The MIT Election Data and Science Lab provided comprehensive records of senatorial election results in Massachusetts from 1982 to 2008, offering a rich repository of political voting patterns. Similarly, the Harvard Dataverse supplied extensive datasets pertaining to political ideologies and electoral dynamics, allowing for a thorough examination of voting trends. The US Department of Transportation, on the other hand, furnished detailed information concerning automotive recalls for issues with service brakes, air, thus enabling a meticulous analysis of vehicular safety concerns.

Data Handling and Preparation:
The collected data were meticulously cleansed and organized to ensure accuracy and coherence. This involved sifting through copious electoral records and recall notifications, much like sifting through a pile of rusty nuts and bolts in search of the ones that fit just right. Numerous data cleaning techniques were employed to address missing values, data inconsistencies, and outliers, akin to restoring a vintage automobile to pristine condition.

Quantitative Analysis:
To ascertain the relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts and automotive recalls for service brakes, air, a series of statistical analyses were executed. Correlation coefficients were computed to gauge the strength and direction of the association, resembling the meticulous inspection of intricate engine components to pinpoint the source of a nagging rattle. Additionally, regression models were employed to explore potential causal links, much like tracing the convoluted route of a circuitous political debate.

Control Variables:
Several control variables, including demographic factors, economic indicators, and political landscapes, were considered to mitigate the impact of confounding influences. These variables were akin to the various components of an automotive system, each playing a distinct role in shaping the overall performance and functionality.

Validity and Reliability:
The validity and reliability of the findings were rigorously assessed through robustness checks, sensitivity analyses, and cross-validation techniques. This process ensured that the observed correlations were not mere statistical illusions but rather robust and dependable, much like the assurance of a smoothly functioning automotive air brake system.

Ethical Considerations:
Throughout the research process, ethical guidelines and data privacy regulations were upheld to ensure the responsible and transparent use of information. In adhering to these standards, the research team demonstrated a commitment to upholding scholarly integrity and ethical conduct, much like the adherence to safety standards in automotive design and manufacturing.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT .

For the time period 1982 to 2008, you found a correlation 0.9961908, r-squared of 0.9923961, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Braking Bad: The Curious Relationship Between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls for Service Brakes, Air

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study scrutinizes the unexpected and, some might say, absurd correlation between the number of votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts and the occurrence of automotive recalls for issues with service brakes, air. By employing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning from 1982 to 2008. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9961908, with a remarkably low p-value of less than 0.01.

It appears that political ideologies may indeed seep into unexpected facets of daily life, much like a sly oil leak in an old jalopy. Who could have anticipated that the voting proclivities of a state known for revolutions and tea parties would dovetail with these automotive malfunctions? This interconnectedness leads one to ponder the underlying dynamics at play, reminiscent of the intricate inner workings of an automotive braking system. Indeed, this research offers a peculiar yet thought-provoking exploration of the intertwined realms of politics and automotive engineering.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The relationship between political ideologies and real-world consequences has long been a subject of interest and speculation. From economic policies to social welfare programs, the impact of political beliefs on societal outcomes has been a subject of scholarly inquiry. However, the curious connection between political voting patterns and automotive recalls for service brakes, air, as highlighted in the abstract, presents a unique and somewhat bemusing avenue for investigation. It is as if the gears of the political machine and the gears of the automotive system have inexplicably become entwined, much like a vehicle caught in an unexpected traffic snarl.
The state of Massachusetts, known for its pivotal role in American history and its distinctive political landscape, provides an intriguing backdrop for this examination. The unexpected correlation between the number of votes for Libertarian Senators and the frequency of automotive recalls for service brakes, air raises eyebrows, and not just because of the brisk Bay State winds. How, one may wonder, could the preferences of the electorate in the land of the Boston Tea Party intertwine with the mechanical foibles of vehicles, particularly those pertaining to the crucial braking and air systems? A conundrum indeed, much like trying to diagnose an enigmatic engine noise that persists despite all attempts at repair.
This scholarly investigation seeks to shed light on the enigmatic connection between political inclinations and automotive safety concerns. The findings have the potential to offer a unique perspective, like discovering an unexpected treasure trove in the depths of a cluttered garage. This research aims to engage not only with the academic community but also with automotive and political enthusiasts alike, much like a lively discussion at a bustling intersection. It is our hope that the findings will provoke thought, spark debate, and perhaps even evoke a few wry smiles, much like the unexpected sight of a vintage automobile traversing the city streets.
In light of the unexpected and confounding nature of the correlation, it is essential to delve deeper into the underlying mechanisms and potential implications of this connection. The following sections will rigorously outline the methodology, data sources, and statistical analyses employed to investigate this peculiar association. This exploration seeks not only to unravel the mystery at hand but also to illuminate the intricate interplay between political inclinations and the unforeseen intersections with automotive safety concerns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts and the occurrence of automotive recalls for issues with service brakes, air. Over the time period of 1982 to 2008, a correlation coefficient of 0.9961908 was found, suggesting a near-perfect positive linear relationship between the two variables. This finding surpassed our expectations, much like stumbling upon a well-hidden spare tire in the trunk of an old sedan.

Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.9923961 indicated that approximately 99.24% of the variance in automotive recalls for service brakes, air could be explained by the number of votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts. Such a high r-squared value left us pondering the extent to which political ideologies can infiltrate even the most unexpected domains, akin to an elusive squirrel that manages to infiltrate a carefully sealed garage.

In addition, the p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence against the null hypothesis, further bolstering the robustness of the observed correlation. This result left us feeling as though we had stumbled upon an unexpected gem at a local flea market, surprised by its rarity and value.

The strong correlation is visually depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot showcasing the unmistakable relationship between the two variables. The figure illustrates the remarkable alignment between votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts and automotive recalls for issues with service brakes, air, much like a perfectly executed parallel parking maneuver on a busy city street.

Overall, these findings highlight a truly perplexing and thought-provoking link between political voting patterns and automotive safety concerns, offering an unexpected surprise much like finding a vintage bumper sticker hiding beneath the layers of a well-maintained classic car.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Braking Bad: The Curious Relationship Between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls for Service Brakes, Air

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study scrutinizes the unexpected and, some might say, absurd correlation between the number of votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts and the occurrence of automotive recalls for issues with service brakes, air. By employing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning from 1982 to 2008. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9961908, with a remarkably low p-value of less than 0.01.

It appears that political ideologies may indeed seep into unexpected facets of daily life, much like a sly oil leak in an old jalopy. Who could have anticipated that the voting proclivities of a state known for revolutions and tea parties would dovetail with these automotive malfunctions? This interconnectedness leads one to ponder the underlying dynamics at play, reminiscent of the intricate inner workings of an automotive braking system. Indeed, this research offers a peculiar yet thought-provoking exploration of the intertwined realms of politics and automotive engineering.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith, Doe, and Jones (2010) conducted a comprehensive examination of political voting patterns in Massachusetts, shedding light on the nuanced dynamics of the state's electorate. Their work sets the stage for understanding the political landscape in which the curious relationship between Libertarian votes and automotive recalls for service brakes, air unfolds. Furthermore, Johnson and Brown (2015) delved into the intricate workings of automotive safety systems, offering crucial insights into the technical aspects of braking and air mechanisms. These studies provide a solid foundation for exploring the unexpected correlation between seemingly disparate domains.
However, delving into the whimsical and peculiar nature of this correlation, it is only fitting to draw inspiration from a range of eclectic sources. For instance, "Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us" by Daniel H. Pink and "Brake for the Teapot: A Massachusetts Mystery" by Laura Childs offer tangentially related insights into motivation and the quaint New England charm that may inadvertently influence political and automotive spheres.
While these works provide valuable context, it is worth considering the unexpected connections that may lie beneath the surface. Perhaps the unsettling intrigue of "Stephen King's Christine" and the mysterious allure of "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance" by Robert M. Pirsig encapsulate the enigmatic fusion of man and machine, which, in this case, seems to extend to the realm of politics as well.
Additionally, the element of chance and choice, akin to the roll of dice in a board game, cannot be dismissed. Games such as "Formula D" or "Ticket to Ride" may not only evoke images of the open road but also prompt contemplation on the curious twists and turns that underpin the intersection of political affiliations and automotive safety concerns.
In light of these diverse and perhaps unconventional sources of inspiration, the present study aims to unravel the intricate tapestry of influences that shape the correlation between Libertarian votes and automotive recalls for service brakes, air. The following sections will delve into the meticulous methodology and statistical analyses employed, seeking to shed light on this curious confluence of politics and automotive engineering.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts and the occurrence of automotive recalls for issues with service brakes, air. Over the time period of 1982 to 2008, a correlation coefficient of 0.9961908 was found, suggesting a near-perfect positive linear relationship between the two variables. This finding surpassed our expectations, much like stumbling upon a well-hidden spare tire in the trunk of an old sedan.
Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.9923961 indicated that approximately 99.24% of the variance in automotive recalls for service brakes, air could be explained by the number of votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts. Such a high r-squared value left us pondering the extent to which political ideologies can infiltrate even the most unexpected domains, akin to an elusive squirrel that manages to infiltrate a carefully sealed garage.
In addition, the p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence against the null hypothesis, further bolstering the robustness of the observed correlation. This result left us feeling as though we had stumbled upon an unexpected gem at a local flea market, surprised by its rarity and value.
The strong correlation is visually depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot showcasing the unmistakable relationship between the two variables. The figure illustrates the remarkable alignment between votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts and automotive recalls for issues with service brakes, air, much like a perfectly executed parallel parking maneuver on a busy city street.
Overall, these findings highlight a truly perplexing and thought-provoking link between political voting patterns and automotive safety concerns, offering an unexpected surprise much like finding a vintage bumper sticker hiding beneath the layers of a well-maintained classic car.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of the present study lend strong support to the prior research, particularly the work of Smith, Doe, and Jones (2010) and Johnson and Brown (2015), which had set the stage for our exploration of the unexpected correlation between Libertarian votes and automotive recalls for service brakes, air. The remarkably high correlation coefficient observed, akin to stumbling upon a long-lost political party manifesto in the depths of a library, underscores the robustness of this curious relationship. The near-perfect positive linear relationship, much like a flawless gear shift in a well-maintained automobile, provides compelling evidence of the intertwined dynamics at play between political voting patterns and automotive safety concerns.

Our findings also align with the whimsical facets of the literature review, drawing inspiration from eclectic sources such as "Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us" by Daniel H. Pink and "Brake for the Teapot: A Massachusetts Mystery" by Laura Childs. It appears that the motivation and mysterious allure depicted in these works have indeed manifested in the political and automotive realms, much like a compelling plot twist that ties disparate storylines together.

The robustness of our observed correlation, akin to fortuitously stumbling upon the last parking spot in a crowded city, prompts a reexamination of the underlying mechanisms at play. The striking alignment between votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts and automotive recalls for issues with service brakes, air highlights the subtle yet undeniable influence of political leanings on the occurrence of automotive malfunctions, much like a coy smile that hints at an unexpected punchline.

Moreover, the high r-squared value underscores the extent to which political ideologies can permeate unexpected facets of daily life, akin to a persistent engine hum that permeates the cabin of a well-traveled vehicle. The compelling evidence against the null hypothesis, reminiscent of a compelling argument that sways the skeptics, bolsters the validity of this correlation, leaving us with a sense of discovery similar to stumbling upon an unexpected rare find in an automotive flea market.

In light of these findings, the present study offers a thought-provoking exploration of the interconnected realms of politics and automotive engineering. The unexpected and, some might say, absurd correlation between Libertarian votes and automotive recalls for service brakes, air not only raises eyebrows but also prompts a reevaluation of the intricate tapestry of influences that shape our daily experiences, much like uncovering an unexpected piece of evidence in a baffling mystery novel.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Braking Bad: The Curious Relationship Between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls for Service Brakes, Air

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study scrutinizes the unexpected and, some might say, absurd correlation between the number of votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts and the occurrence of automotive recalls for issues with service brakes, air. By employing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning from 1982 to 2008. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9961908, with a remarkably low p-value of less than 0.01.

It appears that political ideologies may indeed seep into unexpected facets of daily life, much like a sly oil leak in an old jalopy. Who could have anticipated that the voting proclivities of a state known for revolutions and tea parties would dovetail with these automotive malfunctions? This interconnectedness leads one to ponder the underlying dynamics at play, reminiscent of the intricate inner workings of an automotive braking system. Indeed, this research offers a peculiar yet thought-provoking exploration of the intertwined realms of politics and automotive engineering.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The relationship between political ideologies and real-world consequences has long been a subject of interest and speculation. From economic policies to social welfare programs, the impact of political beliefs on societal outcomes has been a subject of scholarly inquiry. However, the curious connection between political voting patterns and automotive recalls for service brakes, air, as highlighted in the abstract, presents a unique and somewhat bemusing avenue for investigation. It is as if the gears of the political machine and the gears of the automotive system have inexplicably become entwined, much like a vehicle caught in an unexpected traffic snarl.
The state of Massachusetts, known for its pivotal role in American history and its distinctive political landscape, provides an intriguing backdrop for this examination. The unexpected correlation between the number of votes for Libertarian Senators and the frequency of automotive recalls for service brakes, air raises eyebrows, and not just because of the brisk Bay State winds. How, one may wonder, could the preferences of the electorate in the land of the Boston Tea Party intertwine with the mechanical foibles of vehicles, particularly those pertaining to the crucial braking and air systems? A conundrum indeed, much like trying to diagnose an enigmatic engine noise that persists despite all attempts at repair.
This scholarly investigation seeks to shed light on the enigmatic connection between political inclinations and automotive safety concerns. The findings have the potential to offer a unique perspective, like discovering an unexpected treasure trove in the depths of a cluttered garage. This research aims to engage not only with the academic community but also with automotive and political enthusiasts alike, much like a lively discussion at a bustling intersection. It is our hope that the findings will provoke thought, spark debate, and perhaps even evoke a few wry smiles, much like the unexpected sight of a vintage automobile traversing the city streets.
In light of the unexpected and confounding nature of the correlation, it is essential to delve deeper into the underlying mechanisms and potential implications of this connection. The following sections will rigorously outline the methodology, data sources, and statistical analyses employed to investigate this peculiar association. This exploration seeks not only to unravel the mystery at hand but also to illuminate the intricate interplay between political inclinations and the unforeseen intersections with automotive safety concerns.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts and the occurrence of automotive recalls for issues with service brakes, air. Over the time period of 1982 to 2008, a correlation coefficient of 0.9961908 was found, suggesting a near-perfect positive linear relationship between the two variables. This finding surpassed our expectations, much like stumbling upon a well-hidden spare tire in the trunk of an old sedan.
Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.9923961 indicated that approximately 99.24% of the variance in automotive recalls for service brakes, air could be explained by the number of votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts. Such a high r-squared value left us pondering the extent to which political ideologies can infiltrate even the most unexpected domains, akin to an elusive squirrel that manages to infiltrate a carefully sealed garage.
In addition, the p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence against the null hypothesis, further bolstering the robustness of the observed correlation. This result left us feeling as though we had stumbled upon an unexpected gem at a local flea market, surprised by its rarity and value.
The strong correlation is visually depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot showcasing the unmistakable relationship between the two variables. The figure illustrates the remarkable alignment between votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts and automotive recalls for issues with service brakes, air, much like a perfectly executed parallel parking maneuver on a busy city street.
Overall, these findings highlight a truly perplexing and thought-provoking link between political voting patterns and automotive safety concerns, offering an unexpected surprise much like finding a vintage bumper sticker hiding beneath the layers of a well-maintained classic car.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

The findings of this study unequivocally demonstrate an inexplicable and remarkably strong correlation between the number of votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for issues with service brakes, air. This unexpected linkage has left us scratching our heads, much like an automotive technician puzzled by a mysterious rattle in the chassis of a vehicle. The near-perfect positive linear relationship between these variables raises eyebrows, much like the unexpected sighting of an antique automobile cruising through modern-day traffic.

The high correlation coefficient and r-squared value can perhaps be likened to the precision engineering of a well-crafted automobile, leaving us in awe of the intricacies of this peculiar association. The visual representation of this correlation in Figure 1 evokes a sense of marvel, much like admiring the sleek lines and contours of a classic car at a vintage car show.

It is clear that the intersection of political voting patterns and automotive safety concerns presents a terrain ripe for further exploration, offering an unexpected amalgamation much like the fusion of eclectic car parts in a quirky custom vehicle. However, based on the comprehensiveness and thoroughness of our investigation, it is safe to conclude that no further research in this domain is warranted. The results provided by this study offer a glimpse into the bizarre interconnectedness of seemingly disparate domains, much like stumbling upon an unexpected roadside attraction during a long drive.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Braking Bad: The Curious Relationship Between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls for Service Brakes, Air. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Political Wheelies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Braking Bad: The Curious Relationship Between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls for Service Brakes, Air. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Research Endeavors


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Braking Bad: The Curious Relationship Between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls for Service Brakes, Air with an abstract of The present study scrutinizes the unexpected and, some might say, absurd correlation between the number of votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts and the occurrence of automotive recalls for issues with service brakes, air. By employing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning from 1982 to 2008. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9961908, with a remarkably low p-value of less than 0.01.
It appears that political ideologies may indeed seep into unexpected facets of daily life, much like a sly oil leak in an old jalopy. Who could have anticipated that the voting proclivities of a state known for revolutions and tea parties would dovetail with these automotive malfunctions? This interconnectedness leads one to ponder the underlying dynamics at play, reminiscent of the intricate inner workings of an automotive braking system. Indeed, this research offers a peculiar yet thought-provoking exploration of the intertwined realms of politics and automotive engineering.

ChatGPT:

Libertarian votes, Massachusetts, automotive recalls, service brakes, air, correlation, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, US DOT, political ideologies, voting proclivities, revolutions, tea parties, automotive malfunctions, interconnectedness

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts
Detailed data title: Percentage of votes cast for Federal Libertarian Senate candidates in Massachusetts
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts

Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air

Correlation r = 0.9961908 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9923961 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 99.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts) over the 6 years from 1982 through 2008.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.2E-5. 0.0000217375511424794500000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 1 in 0.0022% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 46,003 random variables You don't actually need 46 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.96, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198219881994200020022008
Votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts (Percentage of votes)0.9205330.5064410.6644211.296816.65573.02008
Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air (Recalls)71010436419




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.920533,0.506441,0.66442,11.2968,16.6557,3.02008,])
array_2 = np.array([7,10,10,43,64,19,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Libertarian Senators in Massachusetts"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls for issues with Service Brakes, Air"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 4321 · Black Variable ID: 26402 · Red Variable ID: 1103
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0