about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,222 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the second variable is Annual growth rate of US Real GDP.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina decreased, there was a corresponding decrease in the availability of square dancing partners. This led to a statewide shortage of square dancing events, causing a decline in overall happiness and productivity. With fewer people experiencing the joy of a good ol' square dance, the motivation to work and contribute to the GDP also waned, ultimately leading to a decrease in the annual growth rate of US Real GDP.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a rural South Carolina town where the once bustling farmlands and lively dance halls now sit empty and deserted. Show the abandoned agricultural equipment among the overgrown fields, with the dilapidated barns in the background. Capture the stillness and desolation of the scene, portraying the absence of joy and energy that once filled the town through the now-silent square dance halls. Let the despondent atmosphere convey the decline in happiness and productivity, eventually reflecting in the decrease in the annual growth rate of US Real GDP. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and Annual growth rate of US Real GDP. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Surrealism An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Cute 2D animation a meme A TIME magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and Annual growth rate of US Real GDP, in the following situation: As the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina decreased, there was a corresponding decrease in the availability of square dancing partners. This led to a statewide shortage of square dancing events, causing a decline in overall happiness and productivity. With fewer people experiencing the joy of a good ol' square dance, the motivation to work and contribute to the GDP also waned, ultimately leading to a decrease in the annual growth rate of US Real GDP.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a rural South Carolina town, the number of agricultural equipment operators dwindled, leading to empty farmlands and deserted barns. As a result, fewer people gathered for square dances, and the once lively dance halls remained silent. The absence of joyous square dancing events contributed to a somber atmosphere, with people feeling less motivated and productive. Consequently, the decline in happiness and energy reflected in the overall decrease in the annual growth rate of US Real GDP.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a rural South Carolina town, the number of agricultural equipment operators dwindled, leading to empty farmlands and deserted barns. As a result, fewer people gathered for square dances, and the once lively dance halls remained silent. The absence of joyous square dancing events contributed to a somber atmosphere, with people feeling less motivated and productive. Consequently, the decline in happiness and energy reflected in the overall decrease in the annual growth rate of US Real GDP. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a rural South Carolina town where the once bustling farmlands and lively dance halls now sit empty and deserted. Show the abandoned agricultural equipment among the overgrown fields, with the dilapidated barns in the background. Capture the stillness and desolation of the scene, portraying the absence of joy and energy that once filled the town through the now-silent square dance halls. Let the despondent atmosphere convey the decline in happiness and productivity, eventually reflecting in the decrease in the annual growth rate of US Real GDP.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina caused Annual growth rate of US Real GDP to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Plowing Ahead: The Impact of Agricultural Equipment Operators on US Real GDP Growth

The Journal of Agrarian Economics and Growth Dynamics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and Annual growth rate of US Real GDP. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6338357 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Plowing Ahead: The Impact of Agricultural Equipment Operators on US Real GDP Growth"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the interwoven relationship between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real Gross Domestic Product. Our team took a deep dive into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, striving to unearth the hidden correlations and causations that underpin this intriguing connection. Armed with puns and precision, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.6338357, with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 through 2022.

It turns out that the growth of the US Real GDP may indeed have roots in the fields of South Carolina. Our findings reveal a strong positive relationship between the number of agricultural equipment operators and the expansion of the US Real GDP, shedding light on the significant impact of tractor and combine operators on the nation's economic prosperity. We plowed through the data, unearthing a correlation that's as clear as a freshly plowed field after a rainstorm.

Furthermore, our research indicates that the steady hands steering agricultural equipment in the Palmetto State contribute not only to crop cultivation but also to the tilling of economic growth across the entire country. The implications of our findings are both profound and pun-worthy. After all, who knew that behind the scenes, the agricultural equipment operators were cultivating the nation's economy as adeptly as their crops? This study certifies that when it comes to the US Real GDP, the agricultural sector is not just sowing seeds, but driving growth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and Annual growth rate of US Real GDP. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Plowing Ahead: The Impact of Agricultural Equipment Operators on US Real GDP Growth"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the interwoven relationship between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real Gross Domestic Product. Our team took a deep dive into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, striving to unearth the hidden correlations and causations that underpin this intriguing connection. Armed with puns and precision, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.6338357, with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 through 2022.

It turns out that the growth of the US Real GDP may indeed have roots in the fields of South Carolina. Our findings reveal a strong positive relationship between the number of agricultural equipment operators and the expansion of the US Real GDP, shedding light on the significant impact of tractor and combine operators on the nation's economic prosperity. We plowed through the data, unearthing a correlation that's as clear as a freshly plowed field after a rainstorm.

Furthermore, our research indicates that the steady hands steering agricultural equipment in the Palmetto State contribute not only to crop cultivation but also to the tilling of economic growth across the entire country. The implications of our findings are both profound and pun-worthy. After all, who knew that behind the scenes, the agricultural equipment operators were cultivating the nation's economy as adeptly as their crops? This study certifies that when it comes to the US Real GDP, the agricultural sector is not just sowing seeds, but driving growth.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Agricultural equipment operators are the unsung heroes of the farming world. Much like a plant needs sunlight and water to grow, the economy requires the expertise of these operators to plow ahead and drive economic growth. Before we jump into the statistical analysis, let's reel in a dad joke to kick things off: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!

In this paper, we explore the relationship between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP). We take a hands-on approach to unearth the connections between these two seemingly disparate variables, much like a farmer tilling the soil to yield a bountiful harvest. It's as if the GDP is the crop, and the operators are the ones putting the "agri" in "agriculture."

Our quest for understanding led us to dive deep into the data, utilizing statistical techniques that could make even the most seasoned researcher crack a smile. Picture this: as we sifted through the numbers, it was like embarking on a treasure hunt, with each data point serving as a clue in the grand puzzle of economic growth. A statistical sleuth, if you will.

Now, let's sprinkle in another pun to keep things light: Why do statisticians love farmers? Because farmers always bring plenty of data to the table! Speaking of data, our investigation uncovered a positive correlation between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the expansion of the US Real GDP. It's as clear as day: the more operators, the more ground covered, both literally and economically.

As we further scrutinized the data, it became evident that the impact of these operators reaches far beyond the boundaries of South Carolina. It's almost as if their influence stretches across the nation like the vast fields they tend to. The statistical significance of our findings cannot be overstated. It’s almost like a well-timed rain after a drought – refreshing and impactful.

Hold onto your hats, because here comes another pun: We're not just talking about tractors; we're talking about tractions on the economy. As the data unfolded before our eyes, it became increasingly apparent that the work of agricultural equipment operators is not just about the harvest – it's about cultivating economic prosperity.

In conclusion, our research unearths a connection that is both fascinating and far-reaching. Who would have thought that the movements of agricultural equipment in South Carolina could have such a palpable effect on the nation's economic landscape? It's as if the growth of the economy is intricately intertwined with the growth of the crops themselves. With this paper, we aim to shine a spotlight on the often overlooked but crucial role of agricultural equipment operators in plowing the fields of economic prosperity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and Annual growth rate of US Real GDP. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Plowing Ahead: The Impact of Agricultural Equipment Operators on US Real GDP Growth"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the interwoven relationship between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real Gross Domestic Product. Our team took a deep dive into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, striving to unearth the hidden correlations and causations that underpin this intriguing connection. Armed with puns and precision, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.6338357, with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 through 2022.

It turns out that the growth of the US Real GDP may indeed have roots in the fields of South Carolina. Our findings reveal a strong positive relationship between the number of agricultural equipment operators and the expansion of the US Real GDP, shedding light on the significant impact of tractor and combine operators on the nation's economic prosperity. We plowed through the data, unearthing a correlation that's as clear as a freshly plowed field after a rainstorm.

Furthermore, our research indicates that the steady hands steering agricultural equipment in the Palmetto State contribute not only to crop cultivation but also to the tilling of economic growth across the entire country. The implications of our findings are both profound and pun-worthy. After all, who knew that behind the scenes, the agricultural equipment operators were cultivating the nation's economy as adeptly as their crops? This study certifies that when it comes to the US Real GDP, the agricultural sector is not just sowing seeds, but driving growth.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Agricultural equipment operators are the unsung heroes of the farming world. Much like a plant needs sunlight and water to grow, the economy requires the expertise of these operators to plow ahead and drive economic growth. Before we jump into the statistical analysis, let's reel in a dad joke to kick things off: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!
In this paper, we explore the relationship between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP). We take a hands-on approach to unearth the connections between these two seemingly disparate variables, much like a farmer tilling the soil to yield a bountiful harvest. It's as if the GDP is the crop, and the operators are the ones putting the "agri" in "agriculture."
Our quest for understanding led us to dive deep into the data, utilizing statistical techniques that could make even the most seasoned researcher crack a smile. Picture this: as we sifted through the numbers, it was like embarking on a treasure hunt, with each data point serving as a clue in the grand puzzle of economic growth. A statistical sleuth, if you will.
Now, let's sprinkle in another pun to keep things light: Why do statisticians love farmers? Because farmers always bring plenty of data to the table! Speaking of data, our investigation uncovered a positive correlation between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the expansion of the US Real GDP. It's as clear as day: the more operators, the more ground covered, both literally and economically.
As we further scrutinized the data, it became evident that the impact of these operators reaches far beyond the boundaries of South Carolina. It's almost as if their influence stretches across the nation like the vast fields they tend to. The statistical significance of our findings cannot be overstated. It’s almost like a well-timed rain after a drought – refreshing and impactful.
Hold onto your hats, because here comes another pun: We're not just talking about tractors; we're talking about tractions on the economy. As the data unfolded before our eyes, it became increasingly apparent that the work of agricultural equipment operators is not just about the harvest – it's about cultivating economic prosperity.
In conclusion, our research unearths a connection that is both fascinating and far-reaching. Who would have thought that the movements of agricultural equipment in South Carolina could have such a palpable effect on the nation's economic landscape? It's as if the growth of the economy is intricately intertwined with the growth of the crops themselves. With this paper, we aim to shine a spotlight on the often overlooked but crucial role of agricultural equipment operators in plowing the fields of economic prosperity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their study, Smith and Doe (2020) investigated the impact of agricultural equipment operators on the rate of US Real GDP growth, revealing a positive association between the two variables. This finding is reminiscent of a classic dad joke – Why was the math book sad? Because it had too many problems. In this case, however, it seems that the more operators in South Carolina, the fewer problems the US Real GDP has in achieving growth.

Jones (2018) also delved into this connection and found a similar positive correlation, highlighting the substantial influence of agricultural equipment operators on the nation's economic well-being. It's almost like these operators are the unsung heroes of economic growth, stealthily steering the nation toward prosperity much like a farmer effortlessly maneuvering a combine through a field of wheat.

Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Economics of Agriculture" by Richards and "GDP Growth: Theory and Practice" by Kim and Park provide invaluable insights into the broader landscape of agricultural economics and economic growth dynamics. Meanwhile, "The Grapes of Wrath" by John Steinbeck and "Farmageddon" by Philip Lymbery capture the ethos of agricultural labor and its impact on society, albeit in a fictional context. As the saying goes, sometimes truth is stranger than fiction – or in this case, funnier.

Drawing inspiration from unexpected sources, popular children's shows such as "Bob the Builder" and "Paw Patrol" exemplify the importance of agricultural equipment operators in a lighthearted manner. While their adventures may be whimsical, the underlying message of teamwork and dedication parallels the real-life impact of these operators on the nation's economic growth.

In essence, the literature surrounding the connection between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real GDP provides a rich tapestry of evidence supporting the profound influence of these operators on the nation's economic landscape. Their significance cannot be overstated, much like a good dad joke – perfectly timed and impossible to ignore.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and Annual growth rate of US Real GDP. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Statista . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Plowing Ahead: The Impact of Agricultural Equipment Operators on US Real GDP Growth"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the interwoven relationship between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real Gross Domestic Product. Our team took a deep dive into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, striving to unearth the hidden correlations and causations that underpin this intriguing connection. Armed with puns and precision, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.6338357, with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 through 2022.

It turns out that the growth of the US Real GDP may indeed have roots in the fields of South Carolina. Our findings reveal a strong positive relationship between the number of agricultural equipment operators and the expansion of the US Real GDP, shedding light on the significant impact of tractor and combine operators on the nation's economic prosperity. We plowed through the data, unearthing a correlation that's as clear as a freshly plowed field after a rainstorm.

Furthermore, our research indicates that the steady hands steering agricultural equipment in the Palmetto State contribute not only to crop cultivation but also to the tilling of economic growth across the entire country. The implications of our findings are both profound and pun-worthy. After all, who knew that behind the scenes, the agricultural equipment operators were cultivating the nation's economy as adeptly as their crops? This study certifies that when it comes to the US Real GDP, the agricultural sector is not just sowing seeds, but driving growth.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Agricultural equipment operators are the unsung heroes of the farming world. Much like a plant needs sunlight and water to grow, the economy requires the expertise of these operators to plow ahead and drive economic growth. Before we jump into the statistical analysis, let's reel in a dad joke to kick things off: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!
In this paper, we explore the relationship between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP). We take a hands-on approach to unearth the connections between these two seemingly disparate variables, much like a farmer tilling the soil to yield a bountiful harvest. It's as if the GDP is the crop, and the operators are the ones putting the "agri" in "agriculture."
Our quest for understanding led us to dive deep into the data, utilizing statistical techniques that could make even the most seasoned researcher crack a smile. Picture this: as we sifted through the numbers, it was like embarking on a treasure hunt, with each data point serving as a clue in the grand puzzle of economic growth. A statistical sleuth, if you will.
Now, let's sprinkle in another pun to keep things light: Why do statisticians love farmers? Because farmers always bring plenty of data to the table! Speaking of data, our investigation uncovered a positive correlation between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the expansion of the US Real GDP. It's as clear as day: the more operators, the more ground covered, both literally and economically.
As we further scrutinized the data, it became evident that the impact of these operators reaches far beyond the boundaries of South Carolina. It's almost as if their influence stretches across the nation like the vast fields they tend to. The statistical significance of our findings cannot be overstated. It’s almost like a well-timed rain after a drought – refreshing and impactful.
Hold onto your hats, because here comes another pun: We're not just talking about tractors; we're talking about tractions on the economy. As the data unfolded before our eyes, it became increasingly apparent that the work of agricultural equipment operators is not just about the harvest – it's about cultivating economic prosperity.
In conclusion, our research unearths a connection that is both fascinating and far-reaching. Who would have thought that the movements of agricultural equipment in South Carolina could have such a palpable effect on the nation's economic landscape? It's as if the growth of the economy is intricately intertwined with the growth of the crops themselves. With this paper, we aim to shine a spotlight on the often overlooked but crucial role of agricultural equipment operators in plowing the fields of economic prosperity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To plow through the crop of data and unearth the hidden roots of the relationship between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real GDP, our research team employed a multifaceted approach akin to a well-maintained, multi-purpose tractor in the fields. We gathered data from Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista to cultivate a comprehensive dataset spanning the years 2003 through 2022, ensuring that our analysis covered an expansive and fertile ground.

The first step involved identifying the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina over the specified time period. We meticulously combed through the available databases, plucking data points like ripe tomatoes from the vine. The process was akin to a meticulous farmer, carefully tending to each crop to ensure a bountiful harvest. Our careful curation of this dataset formed the sturdy foundation upon which our statistical analysis flourished.

With our dataset firmly in hand, we then turned our attention to harvesting the annual growth rate of US Real GDP. Just as a farmer utilizes the latest farming equipment to maximize yield, we harnessed cutting-edge statistical tools to extract and analyze the economic fruit of our labor. Our quest for GDP growth data was akin to navigating through a bountiful field, carefully selecting only the most promising economic blossoms to adorn our dataset.

Once our dataset was robustly cultivated, we plowed ahead to conduct a comprehensive analysis. Utilizing advanced statistical methods such as regression analysis, we sought to unearth the intricate relationships between the number of agricultural equipment operators and the growth of US Real GDP. It was akin to tilling the soil, breaking down the hardened clods of data to reveal the fertile ground of correlation and causation.

In addition to the quantitative analysis, we complemented our approach with qualitative insights from industry experts and agricultural economists. Much like a seasoned farmer seeking advice from fellow cultivators, we gleaned valuable perspectives that enriched our interpretation of the data. This multidimensional approach allowed us to cultivate a holistic understanding of the underlying mechanisms driving the observed correlations.

Now, as we plant the seeds of our methodological approach in this field of academic inquiry, let's toss in a pun to keep things light: How does a statistician plow a field? With a regression hoe! Our methodology reflects a careful and thorough process, akin to the precision of an experienced farmer sowing the seeds for a fruitful harvest.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and Annual growth rate of US Real GDP. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Statista .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6338357, r-squared of 0.4017477, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Plowing Ahead: The Impact of Agricultural Equipment Operators on US Real GDP Growth"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the interwoven relationship between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real Gross Domestic Product. Our team took a deep dive into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, striving to unearth the hidden correlations and causations that underpin this intriguing connection. Armed with puns and precision, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.6338357, with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 through 2022.

It turns out that the growth of the US Real GDP may indeed have roots in the fields of South Carolina. Our findings reveal a strong positive relationship between the number of agricultural equipment operators and the expansion of the US Real GDP, shedding light on the significant impact of tractor and combine operators on the nation's economic prosperity. We plowed through the data, unearthing a correlation that's as clear as a freshly plowed field after a rainstorm.

Furthermore, our research indicates that the steady hands steering agricultural equipment in the Palmetto State contribute not only to crop cultivation but also to the tilling of economic growth across the entire country. The implications of our findings are both profound and pun-worthy. After all, who knew that behind the scenes, the agricultural equipment operators were cultivating the nation's economy as adeptly as their crops? This study certifies that when it comes to the US Real GDP, the agricultural sector is not just sowing seeds, but driving growth.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Agricultural equipment operators are the unsung heroes of the farming world. Much like a plant needs sunlight and water to grow, the economy requires the expertise of these operators to plow ahead and drive economic growth. Before we jump into the statistical analysis, let's reel in a dad joke to kick things off: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!
In this paper, we explore the relationship between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP). We take a hands-on approach to unearth the connections between these two seemingly disparate variables, much like a farmer tilling the soil to yield a bountiful harvest. It's as if the GDP is the crop, and the operators are the ones putting the "agri" in "agriculture."
Our quest for understanding led us to dive deep into the data, utilizing statistical techniques that could make even the most seasoned researcher crack a smile. Picture this: as we sifted through the numbers, it was like embarking on a treasure hunt, with each data point serving as a clue in the grand puzzle of economic growth. A statistical sleuth, if you will.
Now, let's sprinkle in another pun to keep things light: Why do statisticians love farmers? Because farmers always bring plenty of data to the table! Speaking of data, our investigation uncovered a positive correlation between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the expansion of the US Real GDP. It's as clear as day: the more operators, the more ground covered, both literally and economically.
As we further scrutinized the data, it became evident that the impact of these operators reaches far beyond the boundaries of South Carolina. It's almost as if their influence stretches across the nation like the vast fields they tend to. The statistical significance of our findings cannot be overstated. It’s almost like a well-timed rain after a drought – refreshing and impactful.
Hold onto your hats, because here comes another pun: We're not just talking about tractors; we're talking about tractions on the economy. As the data unfolded before our eyes, it became increasingly apparent that the work of agricultural equipment operators is not just about the harvest – it's about cultivating economic prosperity.
In conclusion, our research unearths a connection that is both fascinating and far-reaching. Who would have thought that the movements of agricultural equipment in South Carolina could have such a palpable effect on the nation's economic landscape? It's as if the growth of the economy is intricately intertwined with the growth of the crops themselves. With this paper, we aim to shine a spotlight on the often overlooked but crucial role of agricultural equipment operators in plowing the fields of economic prosperity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a remarkable correlation between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Our statistical investigation unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.6338357, indicating a moderately strong positive relationship between these variables. It seems that the engine power of agricultural equipment isn't the only thing driving growth – it's also propelling the nation's economic engine!

The calculated r-squared value of 0.4017477 suggests that 40.17% of the variation in the growth rate of US Real GDP can be explained by the variation in the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina. It's as if these operators hold the key to a substantial portion of the fluctuations in the nation's economic growth. Talk about planting the seeds for prosperity – both figuratively and literally!

The significance level of the correlation was found to be less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship between the variables. This suggests that the correlation we observed is highly unlikely to be a result of random chance. It's like finding a needle in a haystack, except this needle is a significant correlation and the haystack is a vast field of economic data.

Fig. 1 illustrates the strong positive correlation between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real GDP. This relationship is as clear as a cloudless sky on a perfect farming day. You could say that the correlation is as solid as the ground that these operators meticulously tend to.

Our findings provide empirical evidence to support the notion that the number of agricultural equipment operators contributes significantly to the growth of the US Real GDP. It's almost like the tractors and combines are not just cultivating crops; they're cultivating the nation's economic prosperity in a tangible way. Who knew that the nation's economic growth could be tied to the movements of agricultural equipment operators in the Palmetto State? This just goes to show that when it comes to economic growth, the impact of agriculture goes far beyond the farm gate.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and Annual growth rate of US Real GDP. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Plowing Ahead: The Impact of Agricultural Equipment Operators on US Real GDP Growth"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the interwoven relationship between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real Gross Domestic Product. Our team took a deep dive into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, striving to unearth the hidden correlations and causations that underpin this intriguing connection. Armed with puns and precision, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.6338357, with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 through 2022.

It turns out that the growth of the US Real GDP may indeed have roots in the fields of South Carolina. Our findings reveal a strong positive relationship between the number of agricultural equipment operators and the expansion of the US Real GDP, shedding light on the significant impact of tractor and combine operators on the nation's economic prosperity. We plowed through the data, unearthing a correlation that's as clear as a freshly plowed field after a rainstorm.

Furthermore, our research indicates that the steady hands steering agricultural equipment in the Palmetto State contribute not only to crop cultivation but also to the tilling of economic growth across the entire country. The implications of our findings are both profound and pun-worthy. After all, who knew that behind the scenes, the agricultural equipment operators were cultivating the nation's economy as adeptly as their crops? This study certifies that when it comes to the US Real GDP, the agricultural sector is not just sowing seeds, but driving growth.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study, Smith and Doe (2020) investigated the impact of agricultural equipment operators on the rate of US Real GDP growth, revealing a positive association between the two variables. This finding is reminiscent of a classic dad joke – Why was the math book sad? Because it had too many problems. In this case, however, it seems that the more operators in South Carolina, the fewer problems the US Real GDP has in achieving growth.
Jones (2018) also delved into this connection and found a similar positive correlation, highlighting the substantial influence of agricultural equipment operators on the nation's economic well-being. It's almost like these operators are the unsung heroes of economic growth, stealthily steering the nation toward prosperity much like a farmer effortlessly maneuvering a combine through a field of wheat.
Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Economics of Agriculture" by Richards and "GDP Growth: Theory and Practice" by Kim and Park provide invaluable insights into the broader landscape of agricultural economics and economic growth dynamics. Meanwhile, "The Grapes of Wrath" by John Steinbeck and "Farmageddon" by Philip Lymbery capture the ethos of agricultural labor and its impact on society, albeit in a fictional context. As the saying goes, sometimes truth is stranger than fiction – or in this case, funnier.
Drawing inspiration from unexpected sources, popular children's shows such as "Bob the Builder" and "Paw Patrol" exemplify the importance of agricultural equipment operators in a lighthearted manner. While their adventures may be whimsical, the underlying message of teamwork and dedication parallels the real-life impact of these operators on the nation's economic growth.
In essence, the literature surrounding the connection between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real GDP provides a rich tapestry of evidence supporting the profound influence of these operators on the nation's economic landscape. Their significance cannot be overstated, much like a good dad joke – perfectly timed and impossible to ignore.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a remarkable correlation between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Our statistical investigation unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.6338357, indicating a moderately strong positive relationship between these variables. It seems that the engine power of agricultural equipment isn't the only thing driving growth – it's also propelling the nation's economic engine!
The calculated r-squared value of 0.4017477 suggests that 40.17% of the variation in the growth rate of US Real GDP can be explained by the variation in the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina. It's as if these operators hold the key to a substantial portion of the fluctuations in the nation's economic growth. Talk about planting the seeds for prosperity – both figuratively and literally!
The significance level of the correlation was found to be less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship between the variables. This suggests that the correlation we observed is highly unlikely to be a result of random chance. It's like finding a needle in a haystack, except this needle is a significant correlation and the haystack is a vast field of economic data.
Fig. 1 illustrates the strong positive correlation between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real GDP. This relationship is as clear as a cloudless sky on a perfect farming day. You could say that the correlation is as solid as the ground that these operators meticulously tend to.
Our findings provide empirical evidence to support the notion that the number of agricultural equipment operators contributes significantly to the growth of the US Real GDP. It's almost like the tractors and combines are not just cultivating crops; they're cultivating the nation's economic prosperity in a tangible way. Who knew that the nation's economic growth could be tied to the movements of agricultural equipment operators in the Palmetto State? This just goes to show that when it comes to economic growth, the impact of agriculture goes far beyond the farm gate.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study support and extend previous research that has found a positive relationship between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real GDP. Our calculated correlation coefficient, with a highly significant p-value, aligns with the findings of Smith and Doe (2020) and Jones (2018). It seems that the more hands-on-deck in the agricultural fields of South Carolina, the greater the traction in the nation's economic growth. It's as if these operators are not just steering their equipment, but also steering the nation toward prosperity, much like a good old tractor pull!

Our analysis revealed a moderately strong positive correlation, indicating that over 40% of the variation in the growth rate of US Real GDP can be attributed to the variation in the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina. This suggests that these operators play a significant role in driving a substantial portion of the fluctuations in the nation's economic growth. It's almost as if their actions are as inextricably linked to economic growth as the connection between a plow and the earth. Our findings suggest that these operators are not merely plowing fields; they're plowing through the barriers of economic growth.

The significance level of the correlation further underscores the robustness of our findings. It's akin to uncovering a nugget of gold in a stream – the relationship we observed is highly unlikely to be a result of random chance. The strength of this relationship is as firm as the grip of a farmer on a sturdy hoe.

Fig. 1 vividly illustrates the strong positive correlation between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real GDP. This relationship is as clear as a cloudless sky on a perfect farming day. You could say that the correlation is as solid as the ground that these operators meticulously tend to. It's almost as if their hands are not just guiding agricultural equipment, but also guiding the nation's economic growth in a palpable way. After all, they are truly the unsung heroes of the nation's economic fields.

In conclusion, our research provides empirical evidence that the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina significantly contributes to the growth of the US Real GDP. It seems that their role in the nation's economic landscape is not just a "side-dish"; it's the main course in driving sustainable economic growth. Who knew that the nation's economic growth could be tied to the movements of agricultural equipment operators in the Palmetto State? This just goes to show that when it comes to economic growth, the impact of agriculture goes beyond plowing and harvesting - it's also about harvesting economic prosperity. It's almost as if these operators are the real "gardeners" of the nation's economic well-being, and their diligent cultivation is what keeps the economic garden blooming.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and Annual growth rate of US Real GDP. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Plowing Ahead: The Impact of Agricultural Equipment Operators on US Real GDP Growth"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the interwoven relationship between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real Gross Domestic Product. Our team took a deep dive into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, striving to unearth the hidden correlations and causations that underpin this intriguing connection. Armed with puns and precision, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.6338357, with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 through 2022.

It turns out that the growth of the US Real GDP may indeed have roots in the fields of South Carolina. Our findings reveal a strong positive relationship between the number of agricultural equipment operators and the expansion of the US Real GDP, shedding light on the significant impact of tractor and combine operators on the nation's economic prosperity. We plowed through the data, unearthing a correlation that's as clear as a freshly plowed field after a rainstorm.

Furthermore, our research indicates that the steady hands steering agricultural equipment in the Palmetto State contribute not only to crop cultivation but also to the tilling of economic growth across the entire country. The implications of our findings are both profound and pun-worthy. After all, who knew that behind the scenes, the agricultural equipment operators were cultivating the nation's economy as adeptly as their crops? This study certifies that when it comes to the US Real GDP, the agricultural sector is not just sowing seeds, but driving growth.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Agricultural equipment operators are the unsung heroes of the farming world. Much like a plant needs sunlight and water to grow, the economy requires the expertise of these operators to plow ahead and drive economic growth. Before we jump into the statistical analysis, let's reel in a dad joke to kick things off: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!
In this paper, we explore the relationship between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP). We take a hands-on approach to unearth the connections between these two seemingly disparate variables, much like a farmer tilling the soil to yield a bountiful harvest. It's as if the GDP is the crop, and the operators are the ones putting the "agri" in "agriculture."
Our quest for understanding led us to dive deep into the data, utilizing statistical techniques that could make even the most seasoned researcher crack a smile. Picture this: as we sifted through the numbers, it was like embarking on a treasure hunt, with each data point serving as a clue in the grand puzzle of economic growth. A statistical sleuth, if you will.
Now, let's sprinkle in another pun to keep things light: Why do statisticians love farmers? Because farmers always bring plenty of data to the table! Speaking of data, our investigation uncovered a positive correlation between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the expansion of the US Real GDP. It's as clear as day: the more operators, the more ground covered, both literally and economically.
As we further scrutinized the data, it became evident that the impact of these operators reaches far beyond the boundaries of South Carolina. It's almost as if their influence stretches across the nation like the vast fields they tend to. The statistical significance of our findings cannot be overstated. It’s almost like a well-timed rain after a drought – refreshing and impactful.
Hold onto your hats, because here comes another pun: We're not just talking about tractors; we're talking about tractions on the economy. As the data unfolded before our eyes, it became increasingly apparent that the work of agricultural equipment operators is not just about the harvest – it's about cultivating economic prosperity.
In conclusion, our research unearths a connection that is both fascinating and far-reaching. Who would have thought that the movements of agricultural equipment in South Carolina could have such a palpable effect on the nation's economic landscape? It's as if the growth of the economy is intricately intertwined with the growth of the crops themselves. With this paper, we aim to shine a spotlight on the often overlooked but crucial role of agricultural equipment operators in plowing the fields of economic prosperity.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a remarkable correlation between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Our statistical investigation unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.6338357, indicating a moderately strong positive relationship between these variables. It seems that the engine power of agricultural equipment isn't the only thing driving growth – it's also propelling the nation's economic engine!
The calculated r-squared value of 0.4017477 suggests that 40.17% of the variation in the growth rate of US Real GDP can be explained by the variation in the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina. It's as if these operators hold the key to a substantial portion of the fluctuations in the nation's economic growth. Talk about planting the seeds for prosperity – both figuratively and literally!
The significance level of the correlation was found to be less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship between the variables. This suggests that the correlation we observed is highly unlikely to be a result of random chance. It's like finding a needle in a haystack, except this needle is a significant correlation and the haystack is a vast field of economic data.
Fig. 1 illustrates the strong positive correlation between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real GDP. This relationship is as clear as a cloudless sky on a perfect farming day. You could say that the correlation is as solid as the ground that these operators meticulously tend to.
Our findings provide empirical evidence to support the notion that the number of agricultural equipment operators contributes significantly to the growth of the US Real GDP. It's almost like the tractors and combines are not just cultivating crops; they're cultivating the nation's economic prosperity in a tangible way. Who knew that the nation's economic growth could be tied to the movements of agricultural equipment operators in the Palmetto State? This just goes to show that when it comes to economic growth, the impact of agriculture goes far beyond the farm gate.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has definitively plowed through the data to unearth a robust and significant correlation between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real Gross Domestic Product. It seems that these operators don't just sow seeds; they also cultivate economic prosperity with their tractors and combines. Our findings highlight the tractor-rific impact of these unsung economic heroes, showcasing how they drive growth with the same precision they use to till the fields.

If we were to put it in farming terms, it's as if the operators are the fertilizer to the economic soil - essential for robust growth. This positive relationship between agricultural equipment operators and US Real GDP growth is no mere coincidence; it's as intentional as planting crops in the spring.

To wrap things up with a relevant dad joke: Why did the farmer win an award? Because he was out standing in his field, much like the positive correlation we've identified in our research! It's clear that these operators play a significant role in cultivating the economic landscape, and no more research is needed to plow this particular field – it's been tilled to perfection!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Plowing Ahead: The Impact of Agricultural Equipment Operators on US Real GDP Growth. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agrarian Economics and Growth Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Plowing Ahead: The Impact of Agricultural Equipment Operators on US Real GDP Growth. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Agricultural Innovation and Productivity Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Plowing Ahead: The Impact of Agricultural Equipment Operators on US Real GDP Growth with an abstract of This study delves into the interwoven relationship between the number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina and the annual growth rate of US Real Gross Domestic Product. Our team took a deep dive into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, striving to unearth the hidden correlations and causations that underpin this intriguing connection. Armed with puns and precision, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.6338357, with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 through 2022.
It turns out that the growth of the US Real GDP may indeed have roots in the fields of South Carolina. Our findings reveal a strong positive relationship between the number of agricultural equipment operators and the expansion of the US Real GDP, shedding light on the significant impact of tractor and combine operators on the nation's economic prosperity. We plowed through the data, unearthing a correlation that's as clear as a freshly plowed field after a rainstorm.
Furthermore, our research indicates that the steady hands steering agricultural equipment in the Palmetto State contribute not only to crop cultivation but also to the tilling of economic growth across the entire country. The implications of our findings are both profound and pun-worthy. After all, who knew that behind the scenes, the agricultural equipment operators were cultivating the nation's economy as adeptly as their crops? This study certifies that when it comes to the US Real GDP, the agricultural sector is not just sowing seeds, but driving growth.

ChatGPT:

agricultural equipment operators, US Real GDP growth, South Carolina, correlation coefficient, economic impact, tractor operators, combine operators, agricultural sector, economic prosperity, crop cultivation, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Statista, annual growth rate

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina

Annual growth rate of US Real GDP
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Annual growth rate of US Real GDP

Correlation r = 0.6338357 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4017477 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 40.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Annual growth rate of US Real GDP) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0027. 0.0026922746289433064000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.63 in 0.27% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 371 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.27, 0.84 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina (Laborers)27024034017016080100210210250250240310270140120100100290210
Annual growth rate of US Real GDP (Percentage)2.83.83.42.71.8-0.3-2.82.51.52.31.82.32.71.72.22.92.3-2.85.92.1




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([270,240,340,170,160,80,100,210,210,250,250,240,310,270,140,120,100,100,290,210,])
array_2 = np.array([2.8,3.8,3.4,2.7,1.8,-0.3,-2.8,2.5,1.5,2.3,1.8,2.3,2.7,1.7,2.2,2.9,2.3,-2.8,5.9,2.1,])
array_1_name = "The number of agricultural equipment operators in South Carolina"
array_2_name = "Annual growth rate of US Real GDP"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 4222 · Black Variable ID: 14109 · Red Variable ID: 144
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0