about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,152 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Annual US household spending on fish and seafood and the second variable is United Rentals' stock price (URI).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As household spending on fish and seafood rose, more people started to feel a-boat the benefits of a balanced diet, leading to increased productivity. This, in turn, drove up the demand for construction equipment, including the one's provided by United Rentals, to scale up production.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Create an image that reflects the concept of American households enjoying seafood meals, with plates full of fish and shrimp, alongside a busy construction site featuring workers using United Rentals' machinery to build new homes and infrastructure. The image should capture the essence of increased household spending on seafood leading to better health and productivity, and subsequently driving up the demand for construction equipment provided by United Rentals. Emphasize minimalism in the visual depiction. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Annual US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price (URI). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy art illustration Glitch art inspired by bauhaus Cute cartoon Minimalism
ChatGPT: Minimalism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Annual US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price (URI), in the following situation: As household spending on fish and seafood rose, more people started to feel a-boat the benefits of a balanced diet, leading to increased productivity. This, in turn, drove up the demand for construction equipment, including the one's provided by United Rentals, to scale up production.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, we see American households enjoying delicious seafood meals together, with plates full of fish and shrimp. As they savor their meals, we see a construction site bustling with activity in the background, with workers using United Rentals' machinery to build new homes and infrastructure. The increased household spending on fish and seafood has led to better health and productivity, driving up the demand for construction equipment like that provided by United Rentals.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Minimalism ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, we see American households enjoying delicious seafood meals together, with plates full of fish and shrimp. As they savor their meals, we see a construction site bustling with activity in the background, with workers using United Rentals' machinery to build new homes and infrastructure. The increased household spending on fish and seafood has led to better health and productivity, driving up the demand for construction equipment like that provided by United Rentals. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Create an image that reflects the concept of American households enjoying seafood meals, with plates full of fish and shrimp, alongside a busy construction site featuring workers using United Rentals' machinery to build new homes and infrastructure. The image should capture the essence of increased household spending on seafood leading to better health and productivity, and subsequently driving up the demand for construction equipment provided by United Rentals. Emphasize minimalism in the visual depiction.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Annual US household spending on fish and seafood caused United Rentals' stock price (URI) to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Fishing for Clues: A Study of the Correlation between US Household Spending on Fish and Seafood and United Rentals' Stock Price

The Journal of Finance and Marine Cuisine

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price (URI). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9267237 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Fishing for Clues: A Study of the Correlation between US Household Spending on Fish and Seafood and United Rentals' Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between annual US household spending on fish and seafood and the stock price of United Rentals (URI). Leveraging extensive datasets from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we employed rigorous statistical methods to examine this intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9267237 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. These results suggest a strong association between consumer expenditure on aquatic delicacies and the performance of URI in the stock market. While fish may swim in schools, our data illustrates that their financial impact can ripple across various industry sectors. This study not only sheds light on the potential influences of piscine preferences on investment decisions but also serves as a valuable addition to the emerging field of aquatic economics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price (URI). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fishing for Clues: A Study of the Correlation between US Household Spending on Fish and Seafood and United Rentals' Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between annual US household spending on fish and seafood and the stock price of United Rentals (URI). Leveraging extensive datasets from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we employed rigorous statistical methods to examine this intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9267237 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. These results suggest a strong association between consumer expenditure on aquatic delicacies and the performance of URI in the stock market. While fish may swim in schools, our data illustrates that their financial impact can ripple across various industry sectors. This study not only sheds light on the potential influences of piscine preferences on investment decisions but also serves as a valuable addition to the emerging field of aquatic economics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of finance is often characterized by deep-sea dives into complex data and market trends, where investors are constantly fishing for clues to navigate the choppy waters of the stock market. In this context, our study sets sail to explore the uncharted waters of the relationship between US household spending on fish and seafood and the stock price of United Rentals (URI).

As the old adage goes, "There are plenty of fish in the sea," and indeed, when it comes to investment opportunities, the market is teeming with a diverse array of options. However, our focus on the consumption of aquatic edibles and its potential impact on the stock price of a construction and industrial equipment rental company represents a unique angle. While many studies have explored the links between consumer behavior and stock performance, the fishy business of seafood spending offers a rather fin-tastic twist to traditional economic analyses.

Our investigation stems from both a desire to chart new territory in the field of market influences and an awe of the seemingly improbable but compelling association between fishy finances and stock market movements. As we cast our net wide across vast datasets, we cannot help but marvel at the net worth of these aquatic endeavors and their unseen sway on stock prices. In the currents of economic analysis, sometimes the most unexpected findings can emerge from the depths and catch us off guard like a feisty swordfish.

Through this study, we aim to not only reel in valuable insights into consumer behavior and stock market dynamics but also to inject a splash of humor and whimsy into the often staid world of empirical finance. After all, who said economic research can't have a little fun below the surface? So, grab your fishing rod and join us as we embark on this journey to untangle the enigma of aquatic expenditures and their impact on stock market performance. As we navigate the seas of statistics and financial data, let's see if we can hook some intriguing connections and perhaps even a few unexpected sea monsters of knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price (URI). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fishing for Clues: A Study of the Correlation between US Household Spending on Fish and Seafood and United Rentals' Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between annual US household spending on fish and seafood and the stock price of United Rentals (URI). Leveraging extensive datasets from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we employed rigorous statistical methods to examine this intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9267237 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. These results suggest a strong association between consumer expenditure on aquatic delicacies and the performance of URI in the stock market. While fish may swim in schools, our data illustrates that their financial impact can ripple across various industry sectors. This study not only sheds light on the potential influences of piscine preferences on investment decisions but also serves as a valuable addition to the emerging field of aquatic economics.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of finance is often characterized by deep-sea dives into complex data and market trends, where investors are constantly fishing for clues to navigate the choppy waters of the stock market. In this context, our study sets sail to explore the uncharted waters of the relationship between US household spending on fish and seafood and the stock price of United Rentals (URI).
As the old adage goes, "There are plenty of fish in the sea," and indeed, when it comes to investment opportunities, the market is teeming with a diverse array of options. However, our focus on the consumption of aquatic edibles and its potential impact on the stock price of a construction and industrial equipment rental company represents a unique angle. While many studies have explored the links between consumer behavior and stock performance, the fishy business of seafood spending offers a rather fin-tastic twist to traditional economic analyses.
Our investigation stems from both a desire to chart new territory in the field of market influences and an awe of the seemingly improbable but compelling association between fishy finances and stock market movements. As we cast our net wide across vast datasets, we cannot help but marvel at the net worth of these aquatic endeavors and their unseen sway on stock prices. In the currents of economic analysis, sometimes the most unexpected findings can emerge from the depths and catch us off guard like a feisty swordfish.
Through this study, we aim to not only reel in valuable insights into consumer behavior and stock market dynamics but also to inject a splash of humor and whimsy into the often staid world of empirical finance. After all, who said economic research can't have a little fun below the surface? So, grab your fishing rod and join us as we embark on this journey to untangle the enigma of aquatic expenditures and their impact on stock market performance. As we navigate the seas of statistics and financial data, let's see if we can hook some intriguing connections and perhaps even a few unexpected sea monsters of knowledge.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al. (2015)," the authors find a positive correlation between US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price, indicating a potential relationship between consumer preferences for aquatic sustenance and the performance of an industrial equipment rental company. This study provides initial evidence of a connection between these seemingly disparate economic factors, prompting further exploration into the depths of piscatorial influences on investment dynamics.

Expanding on this line of inquiry, Doe and Jones (2018) offer insights into consumer expenditure patterns and their impact on stock market trends. While their focus is not specifically on fish and seafood spending, their findings underscore the significance of consumer behavior in shaping market movements, echoing the underlying premise of our investigation. The authors' work serves as a pertinent reference point in understanding the broader context of consumer spending and its potential repercussions on stock performance.

Turning to more general economic literature, "Fishy Business: How Aquatic Expenditures Can Make Waves in Financial Markets" (2020) presents a comprehensive analysis of the intersection between marine-themed consumer behaviors and investment outcomes. This scholarly work delves into the nuances of fish and seafood consumption as it relates to stock market dynamics, offering a quirkily engaging perspective on the otherwise serious subject of financial influences.

In the fictional realm, "The Catch of the Stock Market: A Tale of Underwater Economics" (2017) by J.K. Finansen and "Seafood Shenanigans: A Finance Mystery Novel" (2019) by Agatha Crustacean dabble in imaginative narratives that entwine the world of aquatic cuisines with the enthralling realm of stock market intricacies. While not grounded in empirical research, these literary pieces offer an amusing exploration of the potential links between seafood and financial investments, adding a splash of whimsy to the scholarly pursuit of market correlations.

Moreover, recent social media musings by finance enthusiasts have drawn attention to the curious parallels between annual fish and seafood expenditure trends and the fluctuations of United Rentals' stock price. Tweets such as "Investing in fish dinners may reel in more than just culinary satisfaction – it could net you a boost in stock returns too! #SeafoodStocksFTW" reflect the lighthearted banter surrounding the intriguing interplay of consumer choices and market dynamics, illustrating the diverse arenas where discussions on piscine economics are making a splash.

As we navigate the seas of scholarly literature, fictitious tales, and digital discourse, it becomes evident that the connection between US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price is not merely a fisherman's tale but a compelling narrative that warrants further analytical attention. In the following sections, we delve into our own empirical investigation to cast a wider net over this captivating correlation, aiming to bait the hook for a more comprehensive understanding of aquatic economics in the context of stock market performance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price (URI). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fishing for Clues: A Study of the Correlation between US Household Spending on Fish and Seafood and United Rentals' Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between annual US household spending on fish and seafood and the stock price of United Rentals (URI). Leveraging extensive datasets from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we employed rigorous statistical methods to examine this intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9267237 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. These results suggest a strong association between consumer expenditure on aquatic delicacies and the performance of URI in the stock market. While fish may swim in schools, our data illustrates that their financial impact can ripple across various industry sectors. This study not only sheds light on the potential influences of piscine preferences on investment decisions but also serves as a valuable addition to the emerging field of aquatic economics.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of finance is often characterized by deep-sea dives into complex data and market trends, where investors are constantly fishing for clues to navigate the choppy waters of the stock market. In this context, our study sets sail to explore the uncharted waters of the relationship between US household spending on fish and seafood and the stock price of United Rentals (URI).
As the old adage goes, "There are plenty of fish in the sea," and indeed, when it comes to investment opportunities, the market is teeming with a diverse array of options. However, our focus on the consumption of aquatic edibles and its potential impact on the stock price of a construction and industrial equipment rental company represents a unique angle. While many studies have explored the links between consumer behavior and stock performance, the fishy business of seafood spending offers a rather fin-tastic twist to traditional economic analyses.
Our investigation stems from both a desire to chart new territory in the field of market influences and an awe of the seemingly improbable but compelling association between fishy finances and stock market movements. As we cast our net wide across vast datasets, we cannot help but marvel at the net worth of these aquatic endeavors and their unseen sway on stock prices. In the currents of economic analysis, sometimes the most unexpected findings can emerge from the depths and catch us off guard like a feisty swordfish.
Through this study, we aim to not only reel in valuable insights into consumer behavior and stock market dynamics but also to inject a splash of humor and whimsy into the often staid world of empirical finance. After all, who said economic research can't have a little fun below the surface? So, grab your fishing rod and join us as we embark on this journey to untangle the enigma of aquatic expenditures and their impact on stock market performance. As we navigate the seas of statistics and financial data, let's see if we can hook some intriguing connections and perhaps even a few unexpected sea monsters of knowledge.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
Our intrepid research team embarked on an adventurous quest across the vast expanses of the internet, navigating treacherous websites and sifting through a sea of information. Ultimately, we relied on the dependable data sources of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to ensure a bountiful catch of relevant economic and market data. While we encountered some red herrings along the way, our perseverance and keen eye for detail allowed us to reel in a substantial dataset covering the period from 2002 to 2022.

Quantitative Analysis:
Armed with our trusty calculators and a school of statistical software, we dove headfirst into the depths of quantitative analysis. With a methodological net cast wide, we carefully examined the relationship between annual US household spending on fish and seafood and the stock price of United Rentals (URI). Adopting a multi-step approach akin to untangling a knotty fishing line, we conducted rigorous regression analyses, time series modeling, and correlation computations to uncover the hidden currents of association between these seemingly disparate economic indicators.

Statistical Techniques:
In our pursuit of scientific enlightenment, we employed an arsenal of statistical techniques, including but not limited to, ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) modeling, and spectral analysis. We harnessed the power of these methods to navigate the choppy waters of data analysis and untangle the complex web of relationships between piscine expenditures and stock price fluctuations.

Control Variables:
Not content to simply fish in shallow waters, we carefully controlled for various economic factors known to influence stock prices, including interest rates, market volatility, and macroeconomic indicators. By factoring in these covariates, we aimed to ensure that our analysis remained as seaworthy as possible, enabling us to isolate the specific impact of fish and seafood spending on the performance of URI's stock.

Limitations and Fishy Anecdotes:
It is important to note that, like an elusive mermaid slipping through our fingers, our study is not without its limitations. While our data provide a glimpse into the aquatic world of consumer spending and stock market dynamics, the observed correlation does not imply causation. Furthermore, the inherent volatility of financial markets and the unpredictable nature of consumer behavior add a touch of unpredictability, much like the whims of a mischievous sea creature.

Despite these challenges, our research sails forward, buoyed by the spirit of inquiry and a deep-seated curiosity about the enigmatic connection between fishy finances and stock market performance. As the saying goes, "A bad day of fishing is still better than a good day at the office," and our endeavor to explore this peculiar linkage certainly made for an exciting voyage through the realms of economic analysis.

Ethical Considerations:
While navigating the uncharted waters of empirical research, we maintained a steadfast commitment to ethical conduct, ensuring the responsible use of data and the dissemination of accurate findings. Our research was conducted in accordance with the highest standards of academic integrity, and we extend our gratitude to the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) for their invaluable contributions to the pursuit of knowledge.

In conclusion, our methodology represents a blend of meticulous data collection, sophisticated quantitative analysis, and a touch of whimsy, reminiscent of an angler chasing elusive prey in the open sea of economic research. Our journey has been both educational and entertaining, and we are eager to share the intriguing findings that emerged from our unconventional expedition into the world of maritime economics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price (URI). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9267237, r-squared of 0.8588169, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fishing for Clues: A Study of the Correlation between US Household Spending on Fish and Seafood and United Rentals' Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between annual US household spending on fish and seafood and the stock price of United Rentals (URI). Leveraging extensive datasets from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we employed rigorous statistical methods to examine this intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9267237 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. These results suggest a strong association between consumer expenditure on aquatic delicacies and the performance of URI in the stock market. While fish may swim in schools, our data illustrates that their financial impact can ripple across various industry sectors. This study not only sheds light on the potential influences of piscine preferences on investment decisions but also serves as a valuable addition to the emerging field of aquatic economics.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of finance is often characterized by deep-sea dives into complex data and market trends, where investors are constantly fishing for clues to navigate the choppy waters of the stock market. In this context, our study sets sail to explore the uncharted waters of the relationship between US household spending on fish and seafood and the stock price of United Rentals (URI).
As the old adage goes, "There are plenty of fish in the sea," and indeed, when it comes to investment opportunities, the market is teeming with a diverse array of options. However, our focus on the consumption of aquatic edibles and its potential impact on the stock price of a construction and industrial equipment rental company represents a unique angle. While many studies have explored the links between consumer behavior and stock performance, the fishy business of seafood spending offers a rather fin-tastic twist to traditional economic analyses.
Our investigation stems from both a desire to chart new territory in the field of market influences and an awe of the seemingly improbable but compelling association between fishy finances and stock market movements. As we cast our net wide across vast datasets, we cannot help but marvel at the net worth of these aquatic endeavors and their unseen sway on stock prices. In the currents of economic analysis, sometimes the most unexpected findings can emerge from the depths and catch us off guard like a feisty swordfish.
Through this study, we aim to not only reel in valuable insights into consumer behavior and stock market dynamics but also to inject a splash of humor and whimsy into the often staid world of empirical finance. After all, who said economic research can't have a little fun below the surface? So, grab your fishing rod and join us as we embark on this journey to untangle the enigma of aquatic expenditures and their impact on stock market performance. As we navigate the seas of statistics and financial data, let's see if we can hook some intriguing connections and perhaps even a few unexpected sea monsters of knowledge.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between annual US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price (URI) revealed a remarkably strong correlation. Our findings indicated a correlation coefficient of 0.9267237, signaling a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Moreover, the r-squared value of 0.8588169 further underscores the substantial proportion of stock price movement that can be explained by changes in fish and seafood expenditure. In addition, the statistical significance of our results was confirmed by a p-value of less than 0.01, highlighting the reliability and credibility of the observed correlation.

Figure 1 illustrates the compelling connection between annual US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price, emphasizing the striking correlation uncovered by our analysis. This scatterplot graphically depicts the alignment between these two variables, visually capturing the remarkable relationship that our statistical measures have quantified.

The findings of this study not only support the assertion of a significant association between fish and seafood expenditure and stock price movements but also highlight the potential impact of consumer behavior in the aquatic domain on the performance of companies in other industries. The unexpected nature of this correlation serves as a testament to the enigmatic and multifaceted influences that underlie the dynamics of the stock market.

In summary, our investigation presents compelling evidence of a robust and statistically significant correlation between annual US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price. These results contribute to a deeper understanding of the intricate interplay between consumer preferences and stock market performance, underscoring the potential ripple effects that seemingly unrelated economic activities can have.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price (URI). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Fishing for Clues: A Study of the Correlation between US Household Spending on Fish and Seafood and United Rentals' Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between annual US household spending on fish and seafood and the stock price of United Rentals (URI). Leveraging extensive datasets from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we employed rigorous statistical methods to examine this intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9267237 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. These results suggest a strong association between consumer expenditure on aquatic delicacies and the performance of URI in the stock market. While fish may swim in schools, our data illustrates that their financial impact can ripple across various industry sectors. This study not only sheds light on the potential influences of piscine preferences on investment decisions but also serves as a valuable addition to the emerging field of aquatic economics.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al. (2015)," the authors find a positive correlation between US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price, indicating a potential relationship between consumer preferences for aquatic sustenance and the performance of an industrial equipment rental company. This study provides initial evidence of a connection between these seemingly disparate economic factors, prompting further exploration into the depths of piscatorial influences on investment dynamics.
Expanding on this line of inquiry, Doe and Jones (2018) offer insights into consumer expenditure patterns and their impact on stock market trends. While their focus is not specifically on fish and seafood spending, their findings underscore the significance of consumer behavior in shaping market movements, echoing the underlying premise of our investigation. The authors' work serves as a pertinent reference point in understanding the broader context of consumer spending and its potential repercussions on stock performance.
Turning to more general economic literature, "Fishy Business: How Aquatic Expenditures Can Make Waves in Financial Markets" (2020) presents a comprehensive analysis of the intersection between marine-themed consumer behaviors and investment outcomes. This scholarly work delves into the nuances of fish and seafood consumption as it relates to stock market dynamics, offering a quirkily engaging perspective on the otherwise serious subject of financial influences.
In the fictional realm, "The Catch of the Stock Market: A Tale of Underwater Economics" (2017) by J.K. Finansen and "Seafood Shenanigans: A Finance Mystery Novel" (2019) by Agatha Crustacean dabble in imaginative narratives that entwine the world of aquatic cuisines with the enthralling realm of stock market intricacies. While not grounded in empirical research, these literary pieces offer an amusing exploration of the potential links between seafood and financial investments, adding a splash of whimsy to the scholarly pursuit of market correlations.
Moreover, recent social media musings by finance enthusiasts have drawn attention to the curious parallels between annual fish and seafood expenditure trends and the fluctuations of United Rentals' stock price. Tweets such as "Investing in fish dinners may reel in more than just culinary satisfaction – it could net you a boost in stock returns too! #SeafoodStocksFTW" reflect the lighthearted banter surrounding the intriguing interplay of consumer choices and market dynamics, illustrating the diverse arenas where discussions on piscine economics are making a splash.
As we navigate the seas of scholarly literature, fictitious tales, and digital discourse, it becomes evident that the connection between US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price is not merely a fisherman's tale but a compelling narrative that warrants further analytical attention. In the following sections, we delve into our own empirical investigation to cast a wider net over this captivating correlation, aiming to bait the hook for a more comprehensive understanding of aquatic economics in the context of stock market performance.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between annual US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price (URI) revealed a remarkably strong correlation. Our findings indicated a correlation coefficient of 0.9267237, signaling a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Moreover, the r-squared value of 0.8588169 further underscores the substantial proportion of stock price movement that can be explained by changes in fish and seafood expenditure. In addition, the statistical significance of our results was confirmed by a p-value of less than 0.01, highlighting the reliability and credibility of the observed correlation.
Figure 1 illustrates the compelling connection between annual US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price, emphasizing the striking correlation uncovered by our analysis. This scatterplot graphically depicts the alignment between these two variables, visually capturing the remarkable relationship that our statistical measures have quantified.
The findings of this study not only support the assertion of a significant association between fish and seafood expenditure and stock price movements but also highlight the potential impact of consumer behavior in the aquatic domain on the performance of companies in other industries. The unexpected nature of this correlation serves as a testament to the enigmatic and multifaceted influences that underlie the dynamics of the stock market.
In summary, our investigation presents compelling evidence of a robust and statistically significant correlation between annual US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price. These results contribute to a deeper understanding of the intricate interplay between consumer preferences and stock market performance, underscoring the potential ripple effects that seemingly unrelated economic activities can have.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study unveil a fascinating relationship between consumers' seafood preferences and the performance of United Rentals' stock. These results not only align with previous research, but they also add a captivating dimension to the discourse on market correlations. Building on the humor-laden literature review, which humorously alludes to fictitious tales and social media quips, our analysis brings a serious yet whimsical perspective to the forefront.

Smith et al.'s (2015) notion of a link between fish and seafood spending and URI's stock price may appear "fishy" on the surface, yet our rigorous analysis substantiates their initial findings. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) may not have specifically examined aquatic expenditures, but their insights into consumer behavior echo the broader impact of consumer preferences on market dynamics, even when they are not "casting their net" into the seafood domain.

Our results provide empirical weight to the more fictional narratives and social media musings highlighted in the literature review. While these sources may seem like "red herrings" at first glance, they mirror the growing recognition of the potential connection between seafood expenditure and stock performance. The "reel" influence of seafood spending on URI's stock price, as demonstrated by our analysis, echoes the murmurings in the online financial community, proving that sometimes, the most unexpected insights "surf" up from the most surprising sources.

In a world where finance and seafood collide, our findings underscore the "catchy" intersection between seemingly unrelated economic activities. The numbers speak for themselves, but the whimsical nature of this correlation evokes a sense of awe at the unpredictable forces shaping our financial landscape. As we navigate the depths of aquatic economics, it is essential to recognize that the markets are more interconnected than they may "seam," and there is always the potential for surprises lying "beneath the surface."

In emphasizing the significance of our results, it is clear that consumer spending on fish and seafood goes beyond mere "fish tales." Our study provides compelling evidence of the tangible impacts of aquatic economics on stock market movements, casting a "wide net" over the enigmatic influences that shape investment decisions.

The connection between US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price undoubtedly swims against the current of conventional market analyses. Our findings invite further exploration into the waves of piscatorial influences on investment dynamics and the potential for "seafood surprises" in the world of finance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price (URI). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Fishing for Clues: A Study of the Correlation between US Household Spending on Fish and Seafood and United Rentals' Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between annual US household spending on fish and seafood and the stock price of United Rentals (URI). Leveraging extensive datasets from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we employed rigorous statistical methods to examine this intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9267237 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. These results suggest a strong association between consumer expenditure on aquatic delicacies and the performance of URI in the stock market. While fish may swim in schools, our data illustrates that their financial impact can ripple across various industry sectors. This study not only sheds light on the potential influences of piscine preferences on investment decisions but also serves as a valuable addition to the emerging field of aquatic economics.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of finance is often characterized by deep-sea dives into complex data and market trends, where investors are constantly fishing for clues to navigate the choppy waters of the stock market. In this context, our study sets sail to explore the uncharted waters of the relationship between US household spending on fish and seafood and the stock price of United Rentals (URI).
As the old adage goes, "There are plenty of fish in the sea," and indeed, when it comes to investment opportunities, the market is teeming with a diverse array of options. However, our focus on the consumption of aquatic edibles and its potential impact on the stock price of a construction and industrial equipment rental company represents a unique angle. While many studies have explored the links between consumer behavior and stock performance, the fishy business of seafood spending offers a rather fin-tastic twist to traditional economic analyses.
Our investigation stems from both a desire to chart new territory in the field of market influences and an awe of the seemingly improbable but compelling association between fishy finances and stock market movements. As we cast our net wide across vast datasets, we cannot help but marvel at the net worth of these aquatic endeavors and their unseen sway on stock prices. In the currents of economic analysis, sometimes the most unexpected findings can emerge from the depths and catch us off guard like a feisty swordfish.
Through this study, we aim to not only reel in valuable insights into consumer behavior and stock market dynamics but also to inject a splash of humor and whimsy into the often staid world of empirical finance. After all, who said economic research can't have a little fun below the surface? So, grab your fishing rod and join us as we embark on this journey to untangle the enigma of aquatic expenditures and their impact on stock market performance. As we navigate the seas of statistics and financial data, let's see if we can hook some intriguing connections and perhaps even a few unexpected sea monsters of knowledge.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between annual US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price (URI) revealed a remarkably strong correlation. Our findings indicated a correlation coefficient of 0.9267237, signaling a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Moreover, the r-squared value of 0.8588169 further underscores the substantial proportion of stock price movement that can be explained by changes in fish and seafood expenditure. In addition, the statistical significance of our results was confirmed by a p-value of less than 0.01, highlighting the reliability and credibility of the observed correlation.
Figure 1 illustrates the compelling connection between annual US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price, emphasizing the striking correlation uncovered by our analysis. This scatterplot graphically depicts the alignment between these two variables, visually capturing the remarkable relationship that our statistical measures have quantified.
The findings of this study not only support the assertion of a significant association between fish and seafood expenditure and stock price movements but also highlight the potential impact of consumer behavior in the aquatic domain on the performance of companies in other industries. The unexpected nature of this correlation serves as a testament to the enigmatic and multifaceted influences that underlie the dynamics of the stock market.
In summary, our investigation presents compelling evidence of a robust and statistically significant correlation between annual US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price. These results contribute to a deeper understanding of the intricate interplay between consumer preferences and stock market performance, underscoring the potential ripple effects that seemingly unrelated economic activities can have.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has dived deep into the economic ocean to reveal intriguing insights into the unexpected relationship between US household spending on fish and seafood and United Rentals' stock price. The remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9267237 highlights the unexpectedly close connection between piscine preferences and stock market performance. While some may find it fishy to draw such a connection, our statistically significant findings demonstrate the potential impact of consumer behavior in the aquatic domain on stock prices.

The visual representation of this correlation in Figure 1 serves as a testament to the unexpected nature of our findings, akin to stumbling upon a treasure trove of financial flounders. The substantial proportion of stock price movement explained by changes in fish and seafood expenditure, as indicated by the r-squared value of 0.8588169, further emphasizes the depth of this association. Our results not only reel in valuable insights into consumer behavior and stock market dynamics but also inject a wave of whimsy into the traditionally staid seas of empirical finance.

While fish may swim in schools, our data illustrates that their financial impact can ripple across various industry sectors, reminding us of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate economic activities. Thus, our study not only sheds light on the potential influences of aquatic delicacies on investment decisions but also serves as a valuable addition to the emerging field of aquatic economics.

At this point, it seems safe to say that no further research is needed in this area. After all, it's not every day that one gets to witness such a fintastic adventure into the realm of aquatic economics!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fishing for Clues: A Study of the Correlation between US Household Spending on Fish and Seafood and United Rentals' Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Finance and Marine Cuisine


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fishing for Clues: A Study of the Correlation between US Household Spending on Fish and Seafood and United Rentals' Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Economic and Financial Analysis of Everyday Consumer Behavior (SEFAECB)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fishing for Clues: A Study of the Correlation between US Household Spending on Fish and Seafood and United Rentals' Stock Price with an abstract of This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between annual US household spending on fish and seafood and the stock price of United Rentals (URI). Leveraging extensive datasets from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we employed rigorous statistical methods to examine this intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9267237 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. These results suggest a strong association between consumer expenditure on aquatic delicacies and the performance of URI in the stock market. While fish may swim in schools, our data illustrates that their financial impact can ripple across various industry sectors. This study not only sheds light on the potential influences of piscine preferences on investment decisions but also serves as a valuable addition to the emerging field of aquatic economics.

ChatGPT:

US household spending on fish, seafood consumption, United Rentals stock price, consumer expenditure on aquatic delicacies, correlation between seafood spending and stock prices, fish consumption and stock market performance, household seafood expenditure impact on stock market, aquatic economics, Bureau of Labor Statistics spending data, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv dataset, correlation analysis of fish spending and stock price, consumer preferences and stock performance.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Annual US household spending on fish and seafood
Detailed data title: Average annual household spend on fish and seafood
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
See what else correlates with Annual US household spending on fish and seafood

United Rentals' stock price (URI)
Detailed data title: Opening price of United Rentals (URI) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with United Rentals' stock price (URI)

Correlation r = 0.9267237 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8588169 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., United Rentals' stock price (URI)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Annual US household spending on fish and seafood) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.6E-9. 0.0000000016199250748148707000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 1.6E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 617,312,501 random variables You don't actually need 617 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.83, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Annual US household spending on fish and seafood (Household spend)121124128113122122128135117121126122129126130140154147170178183
United Rentals' stock price (URI) (Stock price)22.6210.819.3618.9823.5925.618.339.259.9223.1430.254777.27103.1171.11107.88172.92100.31168.41234333.26




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([121,124,128,113,122,122,128,135,117,121,126,122,129,126,130,140,154,147,170,178,183,])
array_2 = np.array([22.62,10.8,19.36,18.98,23.59,25.6,18.33,9.25,9.92,23.14,30.25,47,77.27,103.11,71.11,107.88,172.92,100.31,168.41,234,333.26,])
array_1_name = "Annual US household spending on fish and seafood"
array_2_name = "United Rentals' stock price (URI)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 4152 · Black Variable ID: 19892 · Red Variable ID: 1836
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0