about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,146 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and the second variable is The number of elementary school teachers in Montana.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The higher the score difference, the more likely the winning team's fans are to celebrate by becoming teachers, causing an increase in the number of elementary school teachers in Montana. "Looks like the real victory is for the education system!"

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a vibrant stadium filled with ecstatic fans celebrating in response to a remarkable score difference on the scoreboard during the final game of the World Series. Meanwhile, in the serene outdoors of Montana, a group of beaming elementary school teachers are holding up signs that read "Go Team!" alongside their new recruits joining in the celebrations, symbolizing an increase in the number of elementary school teachers. Make the scene feel jubilant and lively to capture the contrast between the two settings. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and The number of elementary school teachers in Montana. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Scalar art Pop art a funny image macro Surrealism Futuristic
ChatGPT: a funny image macro

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and The number of elementary school teachers in Montana, in the following situation: The higher the score difference, the more likely the winning team's fans are to celebrate by becoming teachers, causing an increase in the number of elementary school teachers in Montana. "Looks like the real victory is for the education system!". Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vibrant and jubilant stadium, the scoreboard displays a remarkable score difference in the final game of the World Series, with the winning team's fans erupting in cheers. Meanwhile, in the serene outdoors of Montana, a group of beaming elementary school teachers stand together, holding up signs that read "Go Team!" alongside their new recruits joining in the celebrations, showing an increase in the number of elementary school teachers.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image macro ] and depicting this scene: In a vibrant and jubilant stadium, the scoreboard displays a remarkable score difference in the final game of the World Series, with the winning team's fans erupting in cheers. Meanwhile, in the serene outdoors of Montana, a group of beaming elementary school teachers stand together, holding up signs that read "Go Team!" alongside their new recruits joining in the celebrations, showing an increase in the number of elementary school teachers. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a vibrant stadium filled with ecstatic fans celebrating in response to a remarkable score difference on the scoreboard during the final game of the World Series. Meanwhile, in the serene outdoors of Montana, a group of beaming elementary school teachers are holding up signs that read "Go Team!" alongside their new recruits joining in the celebrations, symbolizing an increase in the number of elementary school teachers. Make the scene feel jubilant and lively to capture the contrast between the two settings.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series positively influenced The number of elementary school teachers in Montana. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Curveball Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and the Number of Elementary School Teachers in Montana

The Journal of Irreverent Interdisciplinary Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and The number of elementary school teachers in Montana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6918145 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Curveball Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and the Number of Elementary School Teachers in Montana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the seemingly improbable relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in the state of Montana. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we analyzed statistics from 2003 to 2022 and discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6918145 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our findings suggest that there may be a fascinating link between the intensity of the final World Series game and its impact on the educational field in Montana. This unexpected connection raises intriguing questions and invites further investigation into the interplay of sports outcomes and the labor market in unique geographical contexts. Our research aims to spark curiosity and inspire future studies to uncover the underlying mechanisms behind this serendipitous correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and The number of elementary school teachers in Montana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Curveball Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and the Number of Elementary School Teachers in Montana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the seemingly improbable relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in the state of Montana. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we analyzed statistics from 2003 to 2022 and discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6918145 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our findings suggest that there may be a fascinating link between the intensity of the final World Series game and its impact on the educational field in Montana. This unexpected connection raises intriguing questions and invites further investigation into the interplay of sports outcomes and the labor market in unique geographical contexts. Our research aims to spark curiosity and inspire future studies to uncover the underlying mechanisms behind this serendipitous correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The world of academic research often leads us on unexpected journeys, uncovering correlations that may seem as unlikely as a pitcher hitting a home run. In this paper, we investigate the peculiar relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in Montana. While this association may appear as incongruous as a designated hitter bunting, our analysis reveals a surprising statistical connection that cannot be brushed off like a routine ground ball.

The inspiration for this inquiry was sparked by a moment of curiosity akin to a fan catching a foul ball. In delving into the annals of sports history, we stumbled upon a delightful oddity—statistics that pointed to a potential link between the intensity of a decisive World Series game and its resonance in the workforce of the Treasure State. This correlation, seemingly as out-of-place as a shift against a power-hitting lefty, piqued our interest and beckoned us to delve deeper into the enigmatic interplay between sports drama and educational employment trends.

The subject of our investigation may be as unorthodox as a submarine pitch, but our rigorous analysis is as meticulous and systematic as a seasoned umpire calling balls and strikes. Utilizing data from the venerable sources of Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a journey to unravel the mystery that lay dormant in the seemingly disparate realms of baseball and education.

Our findings, as surprising as a knuckleball evading the best hitters, unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6918145, demonstrating a robust relationship between the final game score difference and the number of elementary school teachers in Montana. The significance level of p < 0.01 further cemented the legitimacy of this unanticipated connection, providing an empirical footing as solid as a well-maintained infield at Wrigley Field.

As we present our research, we invite readers to join us in this intellectual game, where the stakes are as high as a tiebreaking grand slam. The implications of our findings extend beyond the confines of the baseball diamond and the classroom, beckoning us to contemplate the intricate web of influences that shape our world. This quirky correlation may just be the curveball that reinvigorates scholarly inquiry, prompting us to seek insight in the most unexpected corners of life.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and The number of elementary school teachers in Montana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Curveball Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and the Number of Elementary School Teachers in Montana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the seemingly improbable relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in the state of Montana. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we analyzed statistics from 2003 to 2022 and discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6918145 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our findings suggest that there may be a fascinating link between the intensity of the final World Series game and its impact on the educational field in Montana. This unexpected connection raises intriguing questions and invites further investigation into the interplay of sports outcomes and the labor market in unique geographical contexts. Our research aims to spark curiosity and inspire future studies to uncover the underlying mechanisms behind this serendipitous correlation.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of academic research often leads us on unexpected journeys, uncovering correlations that may seem as unlikely as a pitcher hitting a home run. In this paper, we investigate the peculiar relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in Montana. While this association may appear as incongruous as a designated hitter bunting, our analysis reveals a surprising statistical connection that cannot be brushed off like a routine ground ball.
The inspiration for this inquiry was sparked by a moment of curiosity akin to a fan catching a foul ball. In delving into the annals of sports history, we stumbled upon a delightful oddity—statistics that pointed to a potential link between the intensity of a decisive World Series game and its resonance in the workforce of the Treasure State. This correlation, seemingly as out-of-place as a shift against a power-hitting lefty, piqued our interest and beckoned us to delve deeper into the enigmatic interplay between sports drama and educational employment trends.
The subject of our investigation may be as unorthodox as a submarine pitch, but our rigorous analysis is as meticulous and systematic as a seasoned umpire calling balls and strikes. Utilizing data from the venerable sources of Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a journey to unravel the mystery that lay dormant in the seemingly disparate realms of baseball and education.
Our findings, as surprising as a knuckleball evading the best hitters, unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6918145, demonstrating a robust relationship between the final game score difference and the number of elementary school teachers in Montana. The significance level of p < 0.01 further cemented the legitimacy of this unanticipated connection, providing an empirical footing as solid as a well-maintained infield at Wrigley Field.
As we present our research, we invite readers to join us in this intellectual game, where the stakes are as high as a tiebreaking grand slam. The implications of our findings extend beyond the confines of the baseball diamond and the classroom, beckoning us to contemplate the intricate web of influences that shape our world. This quirky correlation may just be the curveball that reinvigorates scholarly inquiry, prompting us to seek insight in the most unexpected corners of life.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

To contextualize the unexpected correlation between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in Montana, we embark on a thorough review of existing literature. The exploration of this perplexing relationship leads us to examine a wide array of scholarly work and popular publications, shedding light on the potential interplay between athletic events and labor market dynamics.

Smith and Doe (2015) explore the influences of sports outcomes on societal phenomena in their seminal work, "Sports and Society: A Multidisciplinary Approach." This comprehensive analysis delves into the far-reaching impacts of sports events, presenting compelling arguments for the intricate connections between athletic contests and broader social trends. While their focus extends beyond the realm of education and labor, their foundational insights prompt us to consider the potential ripple effects of pivotal sports moments on seemingly unrelated domains.

In a similar vein, Jones (2018) delves into the intricate relationship between regional sporting events and local economies in "Field of Dreams: The Socioeconomic Impact of Sports." Within the pages of this insightful tome, the author navigates through the complex web of interactions between athletic fervor and economic realities, offering thought-provoking perspectives on the extensive reach of sports competitions. While the direct linkage to educational employment trends in Montana may not be explicitly addressed, the broader framework of societal impacts provides a valuable backdrop for our investigation.

Turning to non-fiction sources with a more specific geographic focus, "Montana: A Cultural and Historical Portrait" by Jennings (2017) provides a comprehensive overview of the unique fabric of Montana's social landscape. While not directly addressing the World Series or educational employment, the intricate tapestry of Montana's cultural milieu offers a backdrop against which the unexpected correlation under examination may find resonance.

Branching into the realm of fiction, "The Education of Little Tree" by Carter (1976) introduces us to the fictional musings of the eponymous protagonist and his journey through a pastoral Montana setting. While a work of fiction, the narrative richness of the Montanan backdrop tantalizingly beckons us to consider the intermingling of sports spectacles and educational pursuits in this picturesque state.

Deviation from the conventional path of scholarly literature leads us to an unconventional source of insight. Through a thorough perusal of grocery store receipts, it becomes apparent that the purchase of hotdogs and Cracker Jack at baseball games showcases a peculiarly strong correlation with statewide employment trends. While not directly elucidating the specific relationship under scrutiny, this lighthearted observation serves to remind us of the unexpected avenues through which enlightening connections may manifest.

As we navigate through the labyrinthine corridors of literature, our pursuit of understanding unveils the peculiar interconnections weaving through the fields of sports, education, and labor. In synthesizing these varied sources, we lay the groundwork for our own investigation, poised to illuminate the serendipitous correlation between the grandeur of the World Series and the labor dynamics of Montana's school system.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and The number of elementary school teachers in Montana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Curveball Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and the Number of Elementary School Teachers in Montana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the seemingly improbable relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in the state of Montana. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we analyzed statistics from 2003 to 2022 and discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6918145 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our findings suggest that there may be a fascinating link between the intensity of the final World Series game and its impact on the educational field in Montana. This unexpected connection raises intriguing questions and invites further investigation into the interplay of sports outcomes and the labor market in unique geographical contexts. Our research aims to spark curiosity and inspire future studies to uncover the underlying mechanisms behind this serendipitous correlation.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of academic research often leads us on unexpected journeys, uncovering correlations that may seem as unlikely as a pitcher hitting a home run. In this paper, we investigate the peculiar relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in Montana. While this association may appear as incongruous as a designated hitter bunting, our analysis reveals a surprising statistical connection that cannot be brushed off like a routine ground ball.
The inspiration for this inquiry was sparked by a moment of curiosity akin to a fan catching a foul ball. In delving into the annals of sports history, we stumbled upon a delightful oddity—statistics that pointed to a potential link between the intensity of a decisive World Series game and its resonance in the workforce of the Treasure State. This correlation, seemingly as out-of-place as a shift against a power-hitting lefty, piqued our interest and beckoned us to delve deeper into the enigmatic interplay between sports drama and educational employment trends.
The subject of our investigation may be as unorthodox as a submarine pitch, but our rigorous analysis is as meticulous and systematic as a seasoned umpire calling balls and strikes. Utilizing data from the venerable sources of Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a journey to unravel the mystery that lay dormant in the seemingly disparate realms of baseball and education.
Our findings, as surprising as a knuckleball evading the best hitters, unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6918145, demonstrating a robust relationship between the final game score difference and the number of elementary school teachers in Montana. The significance level of p < 0.01 further cemented the legitimacy of this unanticipated connection, providing an empirical footing as solid as a well-maintained infield at Wrigley Field.
As we present our research, we invite readers to join us in this intellectual game, where the stakes are as high as a tiebreaking grand slam. The implications of our findings extend beyond the confines of the baseball diamond and the classroom, beckoning us to contemplate the intricate web of influences that shape our world. This quirky correlation may just be the curveball that reinvigorates scholarly inquiry, prompting us to seek insight in the most unexpected corners of life.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Sampling Procedure:
Our study employed a non-randomized convenience sampling method, reminiscent of a baseball manager selecting a lineup based on gut instincts rather than rigorous statistical analysis. We collected data from the years 2003 to 2022, encompassing a spectrum of World Series outcomes and teacher employment trends in Montana. The selection of this time frame aimed to capture a broad representation of events and labor market dynamics that could potentially unveil the elusive connection between sports excitement and educational labor patterns.

Data Collection:
The data pertaining to the score differences in the final game of the World Series were gathered primarily from Wikipedia—our digital source akin to a well-thumbed baseball almanac that unfolds the sagas of past seasons. To complement these sports statistics, we turned to the Bureau of Labor Statistics for reliable information on the number of elementary school teachers in Montana, akin to a reliable full count pitch in the ninth inning.

Quantitative Analysis:
Employing regression analysis, we meticulously examined the relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in Montana. With the precision of a skilled outfielder tracking a fly ball, we calculated the correlation coefficient to unveil the strength and direction of the potential link between these variables. Additionally, we conducted a t-test to ascertain the significance level, bringing statistical rigor to our exploration of this unconventional, yet compelling, association.

Variables and Controls:
To fortify the validity of our analysis, we took into account several important variables and potential confounding factors, aiming to ensure that our findings bore the weight of scrutiny as gracefully as a well-executed double play. These included historical trends in educational employment, economic dynamics of the state of Montana, and the overall contextual shifts in the World Series game itself. Such methodical consideration sought to elevate the reliability and robustness of our results, preventing our conclusions from wilting under the scrutiny of skeptics like a poorly thrown knuckleball.

Limitations:
Despite our zealous efforts to wield data like a seasoned batter handling a hot bat, this study is not without its limitations. The reliance on publicly available data sources, such as Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, poses inherent constraints regarding data completeness and accuracy. Furthermore, our analysis does not delve into the intricate nuances of causality, leaving room for future studies to unravel the underlying mechanisms responsible for the observed correlation. Additionally, the generalizability of our findings may be limited, as the peculiar nature of the association invites the need for contextual specificity akin to a specialized pitch sequence tailored to each unique batter.

Ethical Considerations:
As ethical researchers, we ensured the utmost integrity and transparency in the utilization of data sources, refraining from any foul play akin to a base runner attempting to steal a sign. Moreover, all statistical analyses were conducted in accordance with established best practices, adhering to academic standards as diligently as a pitcher adheres to the rules of the game.

In conclusion, our methodological approach sought to marry the precision of scientific inquiry with the captivating spirit of sports, throwing light on an enigmatic connection that stands as an inviting puzzle for future investigations. This playful yet rigorous endeavor both highlights the joy of academic curiosity and underscores the notion that even the most unexpected correlations can uncover meaningful insights—much like the curveball that bewilders the best hitters, our study aims to leave its readers pleasantly surprised and hungry for further exploration of the curious interplay between the final game of the World Series and the educational landscape of Montana.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and The number of elementary school teachers in Montana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6918145, r-squared of 0.4786074, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Curveball Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and the Number of Elementary School Teachers in Montana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the seemingly improbable relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in the state of Montana. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we analyzed statistics from 2003 to 2022 and discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6918145 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our findings suggest that there may be a fascinating link between the intensity of the final World Series game and its impact on the educational field in Montana. This unexpected connection raises intriguing questions and invites further investigation into the interplay of sports outcomes and the labor market in unique geographical contexts. Our research aims to spark curiosity and inspire future studies to uncover the underlying mechanisms behind this serendipitous correlation.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of academic research often leads us on unexpected journeys, uncovering correlations that may seem as unlikely as a pitcher hitting a home run. In this paper, we investigate the peculiar relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in Montana. While this association may appear as incongruous as a designated hitter bunting, our analysis reveals a surprising statistical connection that cannot be brushed off like a routine ground ball.
The inspiration for this inquiry was sparked by a moment of curiosity akin to a fan catching a foul ball. In delving into the annals of sports history, we stumbled upon a delightful oddity—statistics that pointed to a potential link between the intensity of a decisive World Series game and its resonance in the workforce of the Treasure State. This correlation, seemingly as out-of-place as a shift against a power-hitting lefty, piqued our interest and beckoned us to delve deeper into the enigmatic interplay between sports drama and educational employment trends.
The subject of our investigation may be as unorthodox as a submarine pitch, but our rigorous analysis is as meticulous and systematic as a seasoned umpire calling balls and strikes. Utilizing data from the venerable sources of Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a journey to unravel the mystery that lay dormant in the seemingly disparate realms of baseball and education.
Our findings, as surprising as a knuckleball evading the best hitters, unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6918145, demonstrating a robust relationship between the final game score difference and the number of elementary school teachers in Montana. The significance level of p < 0.01 further cemented the legitimacy of this unanticipated connection, providing an empirical footing as solid as a well-maintained infield at Wrigley Field.
As we present our research, we invite readers to join us in this intellectual game, where the stakes are as high as a tiebreaking grand slam. The implications of our findings extend beyond the confines of the baseball diamond and the classroom, beckoning us to contemplate the intricate web of influences that shape our world. This quirky correlation may just be the curveball that reinvigorates scholarly inquiry, prompting us to seek insight in the most unexpected corners of life.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data from 2003 to 2022 unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6918145, indicating a robust relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in Montana. The r-squared value of 0.4786074 suggests that 47.86% of the variability in the number of elementary school teachers can be explained by the score difference in the final game of the World Series. With a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings hold water like a well-pitched slider.

The striking correlation between these seemingly disparate variables is exemplified in Figure 1, which depicts a scatterplot showcasing the strong association. This connection, like a perfectly executed double play, challenges traditional assumptions and beckons us to rethink the interplay of seemingly unrelated domains.

Our results underscore the unexpected nature of this correlation, echoing the surprise of a pitcher throwing a no-hitter in the World Series. While we cannot provide a definitive explanation for this intriguing link, the magnitude of the correlation prompts us to consider the impact of emotionally charged sporting events on the labor market. Like a suspenseful ninth inning, our findings invite further inquiry into the nuanced ways in which sports outcomes may reverberate across diverse sectors of society.

In conclusion, our research reveals a compelling correlation between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in Montana. This fortuitous discovery mirrors the thrill of a game-winning home run and prompts us to approach scholarly investigation with a spirit of open-minded inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and The number of elementary school teachers in Montana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Curveball Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and the Number of Elementary School Teachers in Montana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the seemingly improbable relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in the state of Montana. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we analyzed statistics from 2003 to 2022 and discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6918145 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our findings suggest that there may be a fascinating link between the intensity of the final World Series game and its impact on the educational field in Montana. This unexpected connection raises intriguing questions and invites further investigation into the interplay of sports outcomes and the labor market in unique geographical contexts. Our research aims to spark curiosity and inspire future studies to uncover the underlying mechanisms behind this serendipitous correlation.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To contextualize the unexpected correlation between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in Montana, we embark on a thorough review of existing literature. The exploration of this perplexing relationship leads us to examine a wide array of scholarly work and popular publications, shedding light on the potential interplay between athletic events and labor market dynamics.
Smith and Doe (2015) explore the influences of sports outcomes on societal phenomena in their seminal work, "Sports and Society: A Multidisciplinary Approach." This comprehensive analysis delves into the far-reaching impacts of sports events, presenting compelling arguments for the intricate connections between athletic contests and broader social trends. While their focus extends beyond the realm of education and labor, their foundational insights prompt us to consider the potential ripple effects of pivotal sports moments on seemingly unrelated domains.
In a similar vein, Jones (2018) delves into the intricate relationship between regional sporting events and local economies in "Field of Dreams: The Socioeconomic Impact of Sports." Within the pages of this insightful tome, the author navigates through the complex web of interactions between athletic fervor and economic realities, offering thought-provoking perspectives on the extensive reach of sports competitions. While the direct linkage to educational employment trends in Montana may not be explicitly addressed, the broader framework of societal impacts provides a valuable backdrop for our investigation.
Turning to non-fiction sources with a more specific geographic focus, "Montana: A Cultural and Historical Portrait" by Jennings (2017) provides a comprehensive overview of the unique fabric of Montana's social landscape. While not directly addressing the World Series or educational employment, the intricate tapestry of Montana's cultural milieu offers a backdrop against which the unexpected correlation under examination may find resonance.
Branching into the realm of fiction, "The Education of Little Tree" by Carter (1976) introduces us to the fictional musings of the eponymous protagonist and his journey through a pastoral Montana setting. While a work of fiction, the narrative richness of the Montanan backdrop tantalizingly beckons us to consider the intermingling of sports spectacles and educational pursuits in this picturesque state.
Deviation from the conventional path of scholarly literature leads us to an unconventional source of insight. Through a thorough perusal of grocery store receipts, it becomes apparent that the purchase of hotdogs and Cracker Jack at baseball games showcases a peculiarly strong correlation with statewide employment trends. While not directly elucidating the specific relationship under scrutiny, this lighthearted observation serves to remind us of the unexpected avenues through which enlightening connections may manifest.
As we navigate through the labyrinthine corridors of literature, our pursuit of understanding unveils the peculiar interconnections weaving through the fields of sports, education, and labor. In synthesizing these varied sources, we lay the groundwork for our own investigation, poised to illuminate the serendipitous correlation between the grandeur of the World Series and the labor dynamics of Montana's school system.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data from 2003 to 2022 unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6918145, indicating a robust relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in Montana. The r-squared value of 0.4786074 suggests that 47.86% of the variability in the number of elementary school teachers can be explained by the score difference in the final game of the World Series. With a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings hold water like a well-pitched slider.
The striking correlation between these seemingly disparate variables is exemplified in Figure 1, which depicts a scatterplot showcasing the strong association. This connection, like a perfectly executed double play, challenges traditional assumptions and beckons us to rethink the interplay of seemingly unrelated domains.
Our results underscore the unexpected nature of this correlation, echoing the surprise of a pitcher throwing a no-hitter in the World Series. While we cannot provide a definitive explanation for this intriguing link, the magnitude of the correlation prompts us to consider the impact of emotionally charged sporting events on the labor market. Like a suspenseful ninth inning, our findings invite further inquiry into the nuanced ways in which sports outcomes may reverberate across diverse sectors of society.
In conclusion, our research reveals a compelling correlation between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in Montana. This fortuitous discovery mirrors the thrill of a game-winning home run and prompts us to approach scholarly investigation with a spirit of open-minded inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our results uncover a thought-provoking link between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in Montana, echoing the incongruous yet significant correlation noted in our literature review. The unexpected nature of this connection is akin to an unexpected knuckleball, defying conventional expectations and launching us into uncharted territory. Smith and Doe's multifaceted examination of sports outcomes and societal trends resonates with our findings, underscoring the intricate web of interactions that transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries. The surprising linkage is more reminiscent of a surprise squeeze play than a conventional home run, challenging prevailing conceptions of causality and beckoning us to embrace the unpredictability of empirical inquiry.

Likewise, Jones' exposition on the socioeconomic impact of sporting events parallels our own endeavor, framing the unanticipated correlation within the broader tapestry of sports' influence on regional dynamics. The resonance of our findings with the rich cultural backdrop painted by Jennings elucidates the complex interplay of Montana's social fabric with seemingly unrelated phenomena, lending additional credence to our serendipitous discovery. Carter's fictional portrayal, while seemingly distant from the empirical terrain, offers a whimsical reminder of the multifaceted nature of human experiences, urging us to consider the unexpected avenues through which scholarly inquiry may unfold.

The piquant observation of hotdog and Cracker Jack purchases as an offbeat barometer of statewide employment trends, while jocular in nature, serves as an irreverent testament to the myriad tangents from which enlightening connections may arise. Strikingly, our results affirm the subtle yet tangible influence of sports outcomes on labor dynamics, akin to the finesse of a well-executed bunt, nudging us to recalibrate our conceptions of causative pathways.

Ultimately, our findings validate the unforeseen correlation between the World Series and the educational labor market in Montana, much like a perfectly executed hidden ball trick. Our research elucidates the multidimensional repercussions of sports outcomes, offering a spirited invitation for future investigations to unravel the intricate mechanisms underlying this delightfully unexpected linkage.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and The number of elementary school teachers in Montana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Curveball Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and the Number of Elementary School Teachers in Montana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the seemingly improbable relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in the state of Montana. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we analyzed statistics from 2003 to 2022 and discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6918145 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our findings suggest that there may be a fascinating link between the intensity of the final World Series game and its impact on the educational field in Montana. This unexpected connection raises intriguing questions and invites further investigation into the interplay of sports outcomes and the labor market in unique geographical contexts. Our research aims to spark curiosity and inspire future studies to uncover the underlying mechanisms behind this serendipitous correlation.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of academic research often leads us on unexpected journeys, uncovering correlations that may seem as unlikely as a pitcher hitting a home run. In this paper, we investigate the peculiar relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in Montana. While this association may appear as incongruous as a designated hitter bunting, our analysis reveals a surprising statistical connection that cannot be brushed off like a routine ground ball.
The inspiration for this inquiry was sparked by a moment of curiosity akin to a fan catching a foul ball. In delving into the annals of sports history, we stumbled upon a delightful oddity—statistics that pointed to a potential link between the intensity of a decisive World Series game and its resonance in the workforce of the Treasure State. This correlation, seemingly as out-of-place as a shift against a power-hitting lefty, piqued our interest and beckoned us to delve deeper into the enigmatic interplay between sports drama and educational employment trends.
The subject of our investigation may be as unorthodox as a submarine pitch, but our rigorous analysis is as meticulous and systematic as a seasoned umpire calling balls and strikes. Utilizing data from the venerable sources of Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a journey to unravel the mystery that lay dormant in the seemingly disparate realms of baseball and education.
Our findings, as surprising as a knuckleball evading the best hitters, unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6918145, demonstrating a robust relationship between the final game score difference and the number of elementary school teachers in Montana. The significance level of p < 0.01 further cemented the legitimacy of this unanticipated connection, providing an empirical footing as solid as a well-maintained infield at Wrigley Field.
As we present our research, we invite readers to join us in this intellectual game, where the stakes are as high as a tiebreaking grand slam. The implications of our findings extend beyond the confines of the baseball diamond and the classroom, beckoning us to contemplate the intricate web of influences that shape our world. This quirky correlation may just be the curveball that reinvigorates scholarly inquiry, prompting us to seek insight in the most unexpected corners of life.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data from 2003 to 2022 unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6918145, indicating a robust relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in Montana. The r-squared value of 0.4786074 suggests that 47.86% of the variability in the number of elementary school teachers can be explained by the score difference in the final game of the World Series. With a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings hold water like a well-pitched slider.
The striking correlation between these seemingly disparate variables is exemplified in Figure 1, which depicts a scatterplot showcasing the strong association. This connection, like a perfectly executed double play, challenges traditional assumptions and beckons us to rethink the interplay of seemingly unrelated domains.
Our results underscore the unexpected nature of this correlation, echoing the surprise of a pitcher throwing a no-hitter in the World Series. While we cannot provide a definitive explanation for this intriguing link, the magnitude of the correlation prompts us to consider the impact of emotionally charged sporting events on the labor market. Like a suspenseful ninth inning, our findings invite further inquiry into the nuanced ways in which sports outcomes may reverberate across diverse sectors of society.
In conclusion, our research reveals a compelling correlation between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in Montana. This fortuitous discovery mirrors the thrill of a game-winning home run and prompts us to approach scholarly investigation with a spirit of open-minded inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]
The correlation between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in Montana uncovers a connection as surprising as a ground-rule double out of nowhere. Our research has shed light on a curiously robust relationship that is as unexpected as a rain delay in a domed stadium. While we cannot definitively explain the mechanisms behind this correlation, the magnitude of the association calls for further examination, much like an outfielder tracking down a deep fly ball.
This peculiar bond challenges traditional assumptions and highlights the whimsical interplay of sports outcomes and labor market dynamics. It tantalizes the intellect, much like a well-executed hit-and-run play, urging future scholars to embrace the allure of unconventional correlations. Nevertheless, it seems that no more research is needed in this peculiar area - after all, we wouldn't want to overextend ourselves like a base runner trying to stretch a single into a double.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Curveball Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and the Number of Elementary School Teachers in Montana. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Irreverent Interdisciplinary Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Curveball Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and the Number of Elementary School Teachers in Montana. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Statistical Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Curveball Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and the Number of Elementary School Teachers in Montana with an abstract of This paper delves into the seemingly improbable relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the number of elementary school teachers in the state of Montana. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we analyzed statistics from 2003 to 2022 and discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6918145 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our findings suggest that there may be a fascinating link between the intensity of the final World Series game and its impact on the educational field in Montana. This unexpected connection raises intriguing questions and invites further investigation into the interplay of sports outcomes and the labor market in unique geographical contexts. Our research aims to spark curiosity and inspire future studies to uncover the underlying mechanisms behind this serendipitous correlation.

ChatGPT:

World Series score difference, elementary school teachers Montana, correlation study, sports outcomes, labor market, Montana educational field, World Series game impact, geographical contexts, sports statistics, educational labor market correlation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series
Detailed data title: Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series

The number of elementary school teachers in Montana
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of elementary school teachers, except special education in Montana
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of elementary school teachers in Montana

Correlation r = 0.6918145 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4786074 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 47.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of elementary school teachers in Montana) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00073. 0.0007269293094493834000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.69 in 0.073% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,376 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.36, 0.87 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series (Score difference)24434323142131131222
The number of elementary school teachers in Montana (Laborers)51405350585053706080571052805280496051904630441042904260433047904920461046504730




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2,4,4,3,4,3,2,3,1,4,2,1,3,1,1,3,1,2,2,2,])
array_2 = np.array([5140,5350,5850,5370,6080,5710,5280,5280,4960,5190,4630,4410,4290,4260,4330,4790,4920,4610,4650,4730,])
array_1_name = "Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series"
array_2_name = "The number of elementary school teachers in Montana"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 4146 · Black Variable ID: 107 · Red Variable ID: 10699
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0