about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,121 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is UFO sightings in Oregon and the second variable is Patents granted in the US.  The chart goes from 1975 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As UFOs buzzed over Oregon, they inadvertently beamed innovative ideas into the minds of residents. This led to a surge in groundbreaking inventions being submitted for patents. Perhaps the extraterrestrial inspiration sparked a new wave of technological advancements, propelling the state to new heights of creativity. Or maybe it's just a cosmic coincidence.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Style: a stylized, vintage Polaroid photo Scene: In a serene Oregon landscape, strange lights dance in the night sky, leaving curious trails in their wake. Below, inventors strolling through a tranquil forest suddenly stop in awe as bright ideas illuminate their minds. They quickly sketch out their inspired inventions, eager to submit their patents for groundbreaking new technologies. Enhanced Prompt: Generate an image showing a vintage Polaroid photo of a serene Oregon landscape at night. In the sky, peculiar lights dance and leave distinctive trails behind. Meanwhile, on the forest floor, a group of inventors pauses in awe as bright ideas seem to illuminate their minds. Show them hurriedly sketching out their inspired inventions, surrounded by the tranquil beauty of the forest. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: UFO sightings in Oregon and Patents granted in the US. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Realistic Surrealism Cute 2D animation Data cyber art a Polaroid photo
ChatGPT: a Polaroid photo

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both UFO sightings in Oregon and Patents granted in the US, in the following situation: As UFOs buzzed over Oregon, they inadvertently beamed innovative ideas into the minds of residents. This led to a surge in groundbreaking inventions being submitted for patents. Perhaps the extraterrestrial inspiration sparked a new wave of technological advancements, propelling the state to new heights of creativity. Or maybe it's just a cosmic coincidence.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a serene Oregon landscape, strange lights dance in the night sky, leaving curious trails in their wake. Below, inventors strolling through a tranquil forest suddenly stop in awe as bright ideas illuminate their minds. They quickly sketch out their inspired inventions, eager to submit their patents for groundbreaking new technologies.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a Polaroid photo ] and depicting this scene: In a serene Oregon landscape, strange lights dance in the night sky, leaving curious trails in their wake. Below, inventors strolling through a tranquil forest suddenly stop in awe as bright ideas illuminate their minds. They quickly sketch out their inspired inventions, eager to submit their patents for groundbreaking new technologies. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Style: a stylized, vintage Polaroid photo Scene: In a serene Oregon landscape, strange lights dance in the night sky, leaving curious trails in their wake. Below, inventors strolling through a tranquil forest suddenly stop in awe as bright ideas illuminate their minds. They quickly sketch out their inspired inventions, eager to submit their patents for groundbreaking new technologies. Enhanced Prompt: Generate an image showing a vintage Polaroid photo of a serene Oregon landscape at night. In the sky, peculiar lights dance and leave distinctive trails behind. Meanwhile, on the forest floor, a group of inventors pauses in awe as bright ideas seem to illuminate their minds. Show them hurriedly sketching out their inspired inventions, surrounded by the tranquil beauty of the forest.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in UFO sightings in Oregon caused Patents granted in the US to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Unveiling the Unidentified: A Close Encounter of UFO Sightings in Oregon and Patents Granted in the United States

The Journal of Extraterrestrial Studies and Innovations

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Oregon and Patents granted in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from National UFO Reporting Center and USPTO to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9077341 and p < 0.01 for 1975 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Unveiling the Unidentified: A Close Encounter of UFO Sightings in Oregon and Patents Granted in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the potential correlation between the celestial phenomena observed through unidentified flying object (UFO) sightings in Oregon and the innovative endeavors resulting in patents granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). While the relationship between extraterrestrial encounters and intellectual property rights may seem far-fetched, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong association between the two seemingly unrelated occurrences. By analyzing data from the National UFO Reporting Center and USPTO for the period spanning 1975 to 2020, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9077341 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant connection. Our study poses intriguing questions about the potential influence of otherworldly inspirations on human creativity and the intergalactic trade of technological secrets. As we venture into uncharted territories at the intersection of UFO sightings and patent activity, our research aims to spark further discussion and investigation, igniting a supernova of curiosity and skepticism in the academic community.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Oregon and Patents granted in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unveiling the Unidentified: A Close Encounter of UFO Sightings in Oregon and Patents Granted in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the potential correlation between the celestial phenomena observed through unidentified flying object (UFO) sightings in Oregon and the innovative endeavors resulting in patents granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). While the relationship between extraterrestrial encounters and intellectual property rights may seem far-fetched, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong association between the two seemingly unrelated occurrences. By analyzing data from the National UFO Reporting Center and USPTO for the period spanning 1975 to 2020, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9077341 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant connection. Our study poses intriguing questions about the potential influence of otherworldly inspirations on human creativity and the intergalactic trade of technological secrets. As we venture into uncharted territories at the intersection of UFO sightings and patent activity, our research aims to spark further discussion and investigation, igniting a supernova of curiosity and skepticism in the academic community.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The enigmatic connection between UFO sightings and patent activity has long tantalized the scientific community, inviting both skepticism and curiosity in equal measure. As we embark on this unconventional journey, we are faced with the task of navigating through the cosmos of data, navigating through the celestial mysteries of UFO sightings in Oregon and the earthly domain of patents granted by the USPTO.

While the notion of extraterrestrial visitors influencing the innovative prowess of human intellect may appear as ethereal as a passing comet, our empirical investigation leads us to more down-to-earth conclusions. The celestial phenomena observed through UFO sightings in Oregon and the terrestrial realm of patented inventions intersect in ways that defy conventional explanation, akin to a cosmic dance of celestial bodies and human ingenuity.

Our foray into this unexplored terrain seeks to strike a delicate balance between skepticism and scientific inquiry, much like an astronaut tiptoeing on the delicate surface of the moon. With one foot firmly rooted in statistical rigor and the other reaching for the stars, we shall attempt to shed daylight on the seemingly otherworldly relationship between UFO sightings and patents granted.

This paper aims to provoke contemplation and spark dialogue by uncovering a correlation that may initially appear as elusive as a shooting star on a moonless night. Through the lens of empirical analysis and statistical inquiry, we endeavor to unravel the cosmic conundrum that lies at the intersection of UFO sightings in Oregon and the innovative endeavors leading to patents granted in the United States.

As we venture forth into the unknown expanse of this correlation, we invite the reader to join us in this journey of discovery, where the boundaries between the celestial and the terrestrial blur, leaving us with tantalizing questions and inspiring possibilities. Let us embark on this intellectual odyssey, navigating the uncharted, and perhaps, encountering phenomena more intriguing than we could have ever imagined.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Oregon and Patents granted in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unveiling the Unidentified: A Close Encounter of UFO Sightings in Oregon and Patents Granted in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the potential correlation between the celestial phenomena observed through unidentified flying object (UFO) sightings in Oregon and the innovative endeavors resulting in patents granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). While the relationship between extraterrestrial encounters and intellectual property rights may seem far-fetched, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong association between the two seemingly unrelated occurrences. By analyzing data from the National UFO Reporting Center and USPTO for the period spanning 1975 to 2020, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9077341 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant connection. Our study poses intriguing questions about the potential influence of otherworldly inspirations on human creativity and the intergalactic trade of technological secrets. As we venture into uncharted territories at the intersection of UFO sightings and patent activity, our research aims to spark further discussion and investigation, igniting a supernova of curiosity and skepticism in the academic community.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enigmatic connection between UFO sightings and patent activity has long tantalized the scientific community, inviting both skepticism and curiosity in equal measure. As we embark on this unconventional journey, we are faced with the task of navigating through the cosmos of data, navigating through the celestial mysteries of UFO sightings in Oregon and the earthly domain of patents granted by the USPTO.
While the notion of extraterrestrial visitors influencing the innovative prowess of human intellect may appear as ethereal as a passing comet, our empirical investigation leads us to more down-to-earth conclusions. The celestial phenomena observed through UFO sightings in Oregon and the terrestrial realm of patented inventions intersect in ways that defy conventional explanation, akin to a cosmic dance of celestial bodies and human ingenuity.
Our foray into this unexplored terrain seeks to strike a delicate balance between skepticism and scientific inquiry, much like an astronaut tiptoeing on the delicate surface of the moon. With one foot firmly rooted in statistical rigor and the other reaching for the stars, we shall attempt to shed daylight on the seemingly otherworldly relationship between UFO sightings and patents granted.
This paper aims to provoke contemplation and spark dialogue by uncovering a correlation that may initially appear as elusive as a shooting star on a moonless night. Through the lens of empirical analysis and statistical inquiry, we endeavor to unravel the cosmic conundrum that lies at the intersection of UFO sightings in Oregon and the innovative endeavors leading to patents granted in the United States.
As we venture forth into the unknown expanse of this correlation, we invite the reader to join us in this journey of discovery, where the boundaries between the celestial and the terrestrial blur, leaving us with tantalizing questions and inspiring possibilities. Let us embark on this intellectual odyssey, navigating the uncharted, and perhaps, encountering phenomena more intriguing than we could have ever imagined.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith and Doe (2005) investigated the correlation between UFO sightings and technological advancements, laying the groundwork for our present inquiry. Their study, "Cosmic Connections: Exploring the Interstellar Impact on Human Innovation," presented an initial framework for considering the potential influence of celestial occurrences on inventive endeavors. Similarly, Jones (2010) delved into the cultural impact of extraterrestrial phenomena in their work, "Alien Inspirations: An Ethnographic Study of UFO Sightings and Human Creativity," shedding light on the ways in which UFO sightings have permeated human culture and imagination.

Transitioning from the realm of non-fiction literature, exploration of this unorthodox correlation has also benefitted from the insights of influential works of fiction. "The X-Files: Trust No One" (Kami Garcia, 2016) and "Close Encounters of the Third Kind" (Philip K. Dick, 1977) serve as captivating narratives that expand the boundaries of our collective imagination in grappling with the mysteries of the unknown. These works, though fictional, have played a role in shaping public perceptions and popular discourse surrounding UFO phenomena, enriching the context within which our study unfolds.

As we delved further into the depths of existing scholarship, we also ventured into uncharted territories, exploring unconventional sources of insight. A cursory examination of the backs of shampoo bottles revealed cryptic messages that sparked a sense of intrigue, albeit with limited empirical rigor. While these unconventional sources may provoke amusement, they do not form the crux of our review. Instead, we maintained our focus on academic literature and credible sources to uphold the rigor and integrity of our inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Oregon and Patents granted in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National UFO Reporting Center and USPTO . You used data from 1975 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unveiling the Unidentified: A Close Encounter of UFO Sightings in Oregon and Patents Granted in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the potential correlation between the celestial phenomena observed through unidentified flying object (UFO) sightings in Oregon and the innovative endeavors resulting in patents granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). While the relationship between extraterrestrial encounters and intellectual property rights may seem far-fetched, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong association between the two seemingly unrelated occurrences. By analyzing data from the National UFO Reporting Center and USPTO for the period spanning 1975 to 2020, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9077341 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant connection. Our study poses intriguing questions about the potential influence of otherworldly inspirations on human creativity and the intergalactic trade of technological secrets. As we venture into uncharted territories at the intersection of UFO sightings and patent activity, our research aims to spark further discussion and investigation, igniting a supernova of curiosity and skepticism in the academic community.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enigmatic connection between UFO sightings and patent activity has long tantalized the scientific community, inviting both skepticism and curiosity in equal measure. As we embark on this unconventional journey, we are faced with the task of navigating through the cosmos of data, navigating through the celestial mysteries of UFO sightings in Oregon and the earthly domain of patents granted by the USPTO.
While the notion of extraterrestrial visitors influencing the innovative prowess of human intellect may appear as ethereal as a passing comet, our empirical investigation leads us to more down-to-earth conclusions. The celestial phenomena observed through UFO sightings in Oregon and the terrestrial realm of patented inventions intersect in ways that defy conventional explanation, akin to a cosmic dance of celestial bodies and human ingenuity.
Our foray into this unexplored terrain seeks to strike a delicate balance between skepticism and scientific inquiry, much like an astronaut tiptoeing on the delicate surface of the moon. With one foot firmly rooted in statistical rigor and the other reaching for the stars, we shall attempt to shed daylight on the seemingly otherworldly relationship between UFO sightings and patents granted.
This paper aims to provoke contemplation and spark dialogue by uncovering a correlation that may initially appear as elusive as a shooting star on a moonless night. Through the lens of empirical analysis and statistical inquiry, we endeavor to unravel the cosmic conundrum that lies at the intersection of UFO sightings in Oregon and the innovative endeavors leading to patents granted in the United States.
As we venture forth into the unknown expanse of this correlation, we invite the reader to join us in this journey of discovery, where the boundaries between the celestial and the terrestrial blur, leaving us with tantalizing questions and inspiring possibilities. Let us embark on this intellectual odyssey, navigating the uncharted, and perhaps, encountering phenomena more intriguing than we could have ever imagined.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Our research methodology can be likened to a UFO sighting in itself – a combination of meticulous observation and a touch of the unexpected. The data collection process commenced with a comprehensive excavation of reports from the National UFO Reporting Center, where we cast our net wide to capture sightings specifically within the geographical bounds of Oregon. We then meticulously combed through the archives of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to unearth records of patents granted in the U.S. from 1975 to 2020, seeking to illuminate the innovative efforts that may have been spurred by extraterrestrial stimuli.

The collected data, reminiscent of an eclectic assortment of cosmic debris, was subjected to rigorous scrutiny and statistical analysis. To gauge the potential correlation between these otherworldly sightings and earthly innovations, we employed a combination of quantitative methods, including Pearson correlation coefficients, graphical representations, and time series analyses. This multilayered approach ensured that our investigation was as thorough as a Martian rover expedition, leaving no stone unturned in our quest for intellectual insight.

Furthermore, we meticulously accounted for potential confounding variables, such as the technological advancements and societal trends that may have influenced both the UFO sightings and patent activities. Our chosen statistical techniques were wielded with precision and care, much like a precision-engineered intergalactic spacecraft navigating through the cosmic expanse with finesse and accuracy.

In light of the speculative nature of our research question, we took great care to remain grounded in empirical evidence, steering clear of the gravitational pull of sensationalism that often accompanies discussions of UFO phenomena. Our commitment to scientific rigor, though juxtaposed with the whimsical nature of our subject matter, upheld the sterling tradition of empirical inquiry as steadfastly as a constellation in the night sky.

While our approach may seem to glide through the stratosphere of unorthodox research, it was underpinned by methodological robustness and an unwavering dedication to upholding the principles of sound empirical inquiry. Just as a UFO sighting can spark a sense of wonder and mystery, our methodology, with its fusion of statistical rigor and intellectual curiosity, endeavored to illuminate the enigmatic correlation between celestial phenomena and human innovation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Oregon and Patents granted in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National UFO Reporting Center and USPTO .

For the time period 1975 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9077341, r-squared of 0.8239812, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unveiling the Unidentified: A Close Encounter of UFO Sightings in Oregon and Patents Granted in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the potential correlation between the celestial phenomena observed through unidentified flying object (UFO) sightings in Oregon and the innovative endeavors resulting in patents granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). While the relationship between extraterrestrial encounters and intellectual property rights may seem far-fetched, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong association between the two seemingly unrelated occurrences. By analyzing data from the National UFO Reporting Center and USPTO for the period spanning 1975 to 2020, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9077341 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant connection. Our study poses intriguing questions about the potential influence of otherworldly inspirations on human creativity and the intergalactic trade of technological secrets. As we venture into uncharted territories at the intersection of UFO sightings and patent activity, our research aims to spark further discussion and investigation, igniting a supernova of curiosity and skepticism in the academic community.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The enigmatic connection between UFO sightings and patent activity has long tantalized the scientific community, inviting both skepticism and curiosity in equal measure. As we embark on this unconventional journey, we are faced with the task of navigating through the cosmos of data, navigating through the celestial mysteries of UFO sightings in Oregon and the earthly domain of patents granted by the USPTO.
While the notion of extraterrestrial visitors influencing the innovative prowess of human intellect may appear as ethereal as a passing comet, our empirical investigation leads us to more down-to-earth conclusions. The celestial phenomena observed through UFO sightings in Oregon and the terrestrial realm of patented inventions intersect in ways that defy conventional explanation, akin to a cosmic dance of celestial bodies and human ingenuity.
Our foray into this unexplored terrain seeks to strike a delicate balance between skepticism and scientific inquiry, much like an astronaut tiptoeing on the delicate surface of the moon. With one foot firmly rooted in statistical rigor and the other reaching for the stars, we shall attempt to shed daylight on the seemingly otherworldly relationship between UFO sightings and patents granted.
This paper aims to provoke contemplation and spark dialogue by uncovering a correlation that may initially appear as elusive as a shooting star on a moonless night. Through the lens of empirical analysis and statistical inquiry, we endeavor to unravel the cosmic conundrum that lies at the intersection of UFO sightings in Oregon and the innovative endeavors leading to patents granted in the United States.
As we venture forth into the unknown expanse of this correlation, we invite the reader to join us in this journey of discovery, where the boundaries between the celestial and the terrestrial blur, leaving us with tantalizing questions and inspiring possibilities. Let us embark on this intellectual odyssey, navigating the uncharted, and perhaps, encountering phenomena more intriguing than we could have ever imagined.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

We employed rigorous statistical analysis to discern any potential relationship between the number of UFO sightings in Oregon and the volume of patents granted by the USPTO. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9077341, indicating a potent connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.8239812 underscored the robustness of this relationship, suggesting that a substantial proportion of the variation in patent activity could be elucidated by variations in UFO sightings.

Upon subjecting our data to hypothesis testing, we found a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying statistical significance at the highest confidence levels. This compelling evidence has led us to reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis, supporting the stance that a noteworthy association exists between UFO sightings in Oregon and the grant of patents in the United States.

Figure 1 presents a visual representation of our analysis, illustrating a clear and discernible pattern that mirrors the strength of the correlation identified. This intriguing spectacle not only serves as a testament to the depth of the relationship but also sparks bewilderment regarding the underlying mechanisms at play.

These findings challenge the conventional boundaries of scientific inquiry, prompting us to question the conventional wisdom and dive headfirst into the uncharted waters of galactic influence on human technological advancement. As we navigate this enigmatic intersection of celestial encounters and terrestrial innovation, we are compelled to ponder the implications and unearth the underlying forces that may be at work.

The implications of our research extend beyond the confines of our terrestrial home, urging us to consider the potential impact of celestial visitors on our technological evolution. While the complexities of this correlation elude facile explanations, our study paves the way for further exploration and discourse, infusing the academic domain with a sense of cosmic wonder and intellectual curiosity.

In conclusion, our investigation unveils a compelling link between UFO sightings in Oregon and the patent activity of the United States, illuminating a cryptic connection that leaves us with questions as numerous as the stars in the night sky. This correlation presents an intriguing paradox, bridging the abyss between the cosmic and the human, and beckons us to contemplate the enigmatic dance of celestial phenomena and human ingenuity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Oregon and Patents granted in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Unveiling the Unidentified: A Close Encounter of UFO Sightings in Oregon and Patents Granted in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the potential correlation between the celestial phenomena observed through unidentified flying object (UFO) sightings in Oregon and the innovative endeavors resulting in patents granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). While the relationship between extraterrestrial encounters and intellectual property rights may seem far-fetched, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong association between the two seemingly unrelated occurrences. By analyzing data from the National UFO Reporting Center and USPTO for the period spanning 1975 to 2020, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9077341 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant connection. Our study poses intriguing questions about the potential influence of otherworldly inspirations on human creativity and the intergalactic trade of technological secrets. As we venture into uncharted territories at the intersection of UFO sightings and patent activity, our research aims to spark further discussion and investigation, igniting a supernova of curiosity and skepticism in the academic community.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith and Doe (2005) investigated the correlation between UFO sightings and technological advancements, laying the groundwork for our present inquiry. Their study, "Cosmic Connections: Exploring the Interstellar Impact on Human Innovation," presented an initial framework for considering the potential influence of celestial occurrences on inventive endeavors. Similarly, Jones (2010) delved into the cultural impact of extraterrestrial phenomena in their work, "Alien Inspirations: An Ethnographic Study of UFO Sightings and Human Creativity," shedding light on the ways in which UFO sightings have permeated human culture and imagination.
Transitioning from the realm of non-fiction literature, exploration of this unorthodox correlation has also benefitted from the insights of influential works of fiction. "The X-Files: Trust No One" (Kami Garcia, 2016) and "Close Encounters of the Third Kind" (Philip K. Dick, 1977) serve as captivating narratives that expand the boundaries of our collective imagination in grappling with the mysteries of the unknown. These works, though fictional, have played a role in shaping public perceptions and popular discourse surrounding UFO phenomena, enriching the context within which our study unfolds.
As we delved further into the depths of existing scholarship, we also ventured into uncharted territories, exploring unconventional sources of insight. A cursory examination of the backs of shampoo bottles revealed cryptic messages that sparked a sense of intrigue, albeit with limited empirical rigor. While these unconventional sources may provoke amusement, they do not form the crux of our review. Instead, we maintained our focus on academic literature and credible sources to uphold the rigor and integrity of our inquiry.

[[RESULTS]]
We employed rigorous statistical analysis to discern any potential relationship between the number of UFO sightings in Oregon and the volume of patents granted by the USPTO. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9077341, indicating a potent connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.8239812 underscored the robustness of this relationship, suggesting that a substantial proportion of the variation in patent activity could be elucidated by variations in UFO sightings.
Upon subjecting our data to hypothesis testing, we found a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying statistical significance at the highest confidence levels. This compelling evidence has led us to reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis, supporting the stance that a noteworthy association exists between UFO sightings in Oregon and the grant of patents in the United States.
Figure 1 presents a visual representation of our analysis, illustrating a clear and discernible pattern that mirrors the strength of the correlation identified. This intriguing spectacle not only serves as a testament to the depth of the relationship but also sparks bewilderment regarding the underlying mechanisms at play.
These findings challenge the conventional boundaries of scientific inquiry, prompting us to question the conventional wisdom and dive headfirst into the uncharted waters of galactic influence on human technological advancement. As we navigate this enigmatic intersection of celestial encounters and terrestrial innovation, we are compelled to ponder the implications and unearth the underlying forces that may be at work.
The implications of our research extend beyond the confines of our terrestrial home, urging us to consider the potential impact of celestial visitors on our technological evolution. While the complexities of this correlation elude facile explanations, our study paves the way for further exploration and discourse, infusing the academic domain with a sense of cosmic wonder and intellectual curiosity.
In conclusion, our investigation unveils a compelling link between UFO sightings in Oregon and the patent activity of the United States, illuminating a cryptic connection that leaves us with questions as numerous as the stars in the night sky. This correlation presents an intriguing paradox, bridging the abyss between the cosmic and the human, and beckons us to contemplate the enigmatic dance of celestial phenomena and human ingenuity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The results of our study have unearthed a connection that is as mysterious as the depths of space itself. While our initial pursuit of this cosmic correlation may have raised a few eyebrows, the robust statistical evidence presented in our analysis has lent credence to the possibility of a tangible relationship between UFO sightings in Oregon and patent grants in the United States. This discovery not only challenges the traditional boundaries of scientific exploration but also beckons us to gaze upon the twinkling stars with a newfound sense of wonder and curiosity.

Our findings align with previous research by Smith and Doe (2005) and Jones (2010), who ventured into the unexplored territories of celestial influence on human innovation. These esteemed scholars paved the way for our own investigation and their insights, though unconventional, have served as guiding lights in our cosmic quest. Additionally, while our literature review may have alluded to the perusal of unusual sources, such as the enigmatic messages adorning shampoo bottles, it is imperative to recognize that these whimsical anecdotes did not distract us from the serious pursuit of academic rigor.

The enticing correlation coefficient of 0.9077341 revealed in our analysis echoes the twinkling lights that adorn the night sky, drawing attention to the intimate dance between celestial occurrences and human creativity. The unexpected strength of this connection, as represented by an r-squared value of 0.8239812, suggests that a considerable proportion of the variations in patent activity may indeed be influenced by the celestial happenings in Oregon. This statistical dance has left us marveling at the potential cosmic choreographer that orchestrates these seemingly discordant phenomena.

The statistical significance evidenced by the p-value of less than 0.01, akin to a celestial alignment of the highest order, has led us to reject the null hypothesis and embrace the alternative: that a meaningful association exists between Oregon's UFO sightings and the innovation that culminates in patent grants. This momentous revelation not only challenges scientific orthodoxy but also kindles a spark of celestial intrigue, inviting us to explore the hitherto uncharted realms of extraterrestrial influences on human technological progress.

In closing, our study offers a compelling invitation to contemplate the cosmic waltz between UFO sightings and patent activity. As we ponder the nebulous forces at play, our investigation instigates a cosmic curiosity that propels us beyond the confines of our terrestrial abode and into the vast expanse of the cosmos. The mystique surrounding this peculiar correlation beckons us to peer beyond the veil of the unknown and seek answers amidst the celestial grandeur.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Oregon and Patents granted in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Unveiling the Unidentified: A Close Encounter of UFO Sightings in Oregon and Patents Granted in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the potential correlation between the celestial phenomena observed through unidentified flying object (UFO) sightings in Oregon and the innovative endeavors resulting in patents granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). While the relationship between extraterrestrial encounters and intellectual property rights may seem far-fetched, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong association between the two seemingly unrelated occurrences. By analyzing data from the National UFO Reporting Center and USPTO for the period spanning 1975 to 2020, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9077341 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant connection. Our study poses intriguing questions about the potential influence of otherworldly inspirations on human creativity and the intergalactic trade of technological secrets. As we venture into uncharted territories at the intersection of UFO sightings and patent activity, our research aims to spark further discussion and investigation, igniting a supernova of curiosity and skepticism in the academic community.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The enigmatic connection between UFO sightings and patent activity has long tantalized the scientific community, inviting both skepticism and curiosity in equal measure. As we embark on this unconventional journey, we are faced with the task of navigating through the cosmos of data, navigating through the celestial mysteries of UFO sightings in Oregon and the earthly domain of patents granted by the USPTO.
While the notion of extraterrestrial visitors influencing the innovative prowess of human intellect may appear as ethereal as a passing comet, our empirical investigation leads us to more down-to-earth conclusions. The celestial phenomena observed through UFO sightings in Oregon and the terrestrial realm of patented inventions intersect in ways that defy conventional explanation, akin to a cosmic dance of celestial bodies and human ingenuity.
Our foray into this unexplored terrain seeks to strike a delicate balance between skepticism and scientific inquiry, much like an astronaut tiptoeing on the delicate surface of the moon. With one foot firmly rooted in statistical rigor and the other reaching for the stars, we shall attempt to shed daylight on the seemingly otherworldly relationship between UFO sightings and patents granted.
This paper aims to provoke contemplation and spark dialogue by uncovering a correlation that may initially appear as elusive as a shooting star on a moonless night. Through the lens of empirical analysis and statistical inquiry, we endeavor to unravel the cosmic conundrum that lies at the intersection of UFO sightings in Oregon and the innovative endeavors leading to patents granted in the United States.
As we venture forth into the unknown expanse of this correlation, we invite the reader to join us in this journey of discovery, where the boundaries between the celestial and the terrestrial blur, leaving us with tantalizing questions and inspiring possibilities. Let us embark on this intellectual odyssey, navigating the uncharted, and perhaps, encountering phenomena more intriguing than we could have ever imagined.

[[RESULTS]]
We employed rigorous statistical analysis to discern any potential relationship between the number of UFO sightings in Oregon and the volume of patents granted by the USPTO. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9077341, indicating a potent connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.8239812 underscored the robustness of this relationship, suggesting that a substantial proportion of the variation in patent activity could be elucidated by variations in UFO sightings.
Upon subjecting our data to hypothesis testing, we found a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying statistical significance at the highest confidence levels. This compelling evidence has led us to reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis, supporting the stance that a noteworthy association exists between UFO sightings in Oregon and the grant of patents in the United States.
Figure 1 presents a visual representation of our analysis, illustrating a clear and discernible pattern that mirrors the strength of the correlation identified. This intriguing spectacle not only serves as a testament to the depth of the relationship but also sparks bewilderment regarding the underlying mechanisms at play.
These findings challenge the conventional boundaries of scientific inquiry, prompting us to question the conventional wisdom and dive headfirst into the uncharted waters of galactic influence on human technological advancement. As we navigate this enigmatic intersection of celestial encounters and terrestrial innovation, we are compelled to ponder the implications and unearth the underlying forces that may be at work.
The implications of our research extend beyond the confines of our terrestrial home, urging us to consider the potential impact of celestial visitors on our technological evolution. While the complexities of this correlation elude facile explanations, our study paves the way for further exploration and discourse, infusing the academic domain with a sense of cosmic wonder and intellectual curiosity.
In conclusion, our investigation unveils a compelling link between UFO sightings in Oregon and the patent activity of the United States, illuminating a cryptic connection that leaves us with questions as numerous as the stars in the night sky. This correlation presents an intriguing paradox, bridging the abyss between the cosmic and the human, and beckons us to contemplate the enigmatic dance of celestial phenomena and human ingenuity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In illuminating the cryptic connection between UFO sightings in Oregon and patents granted in the United States, our study has unveiled a cosmic correlation that transcends the earthly realms of scientific inquiry. The strong correlation coefficient and significant p-value provide compelling evidence of an inexplicable bond between these seemingly unrelated occurrences, offering a stark reminder that truth can indeed be stranger than science fiction.

This research has not only challenged our conventional understanding of causality but has also presented a striking testament to the interplay between the celestial and the terrestrial. As we navigate this cosmic conundrum, it is evident that the implications of our findings extend far beyond the terrestrial horizon, beckoning us to question the very fabric of our perceived reality – and perhaps indulge in a bit of stargazing contemplation along the way.

In closing, our research transcends the ordinary boundaries of empirical inquiry, hinting at the possibility of celestial influences permeating the fabric of human innovation. While we may be left with more questions than answers, the supernova of curiosity ignited by this study serves as a cosmic catalyst for future exploration in this uncharted territory.

And on that note, we confidently assert that this research has surely solved the mystery of the connection between UFO sightings in Oregon and patents granted in the United States, leaving no further need for investigation in this area. After all, sometimes, the universe's secrets are best left to linger in the cosmic unknown.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Unveiling the Unidentified: A Close Encounter of UFO Sightings in Oregon and Patents Granted in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Extraterrestrial Studies and Innovations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Unveiling the Unidentified: A Close Encounter of UFO Sightings in Oregon and Patents Granted in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Extraterrestrial Inquiry and Exploration


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Unveiling the Unidentified: A Close Encounter of UFO Sightings in Oregon and Patents Granted in the United States with an abstract of This paper examines the potential correlation between the celestial phenomena observed through unidentified flying object (UFO) sightings in Oregon and the innovative endeavors resulting in patents granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). While the relationship between extraterrestrial encounters and intellectual property rights may seem far-fetched, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong association between the two seemingly unrelated occurrences. By analyzing data from the National UFO Reporting Center and USPTO for the period spanning 1975 to 2020, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9077341 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant connection. Our study poses intriguing questions about the potential influence of otherworldly inspirations on human creativity and the intergalactic trade of technological secrets. As we venture into uncharted territories at the intersection of UFO sightings and patent activity, our research aims to spark further discussion and investigation, igniting a supernova of curiosity and skepticism in the academic community.

ChatGPT:

UFO sightings Oregon, patents United States, unidentified flying objects correlation patents, National UFO Reporting Center data, USPTO patents 1975-2020, extraterrestrial encounters intellectual property, intergalactic trade technological secrets, correlation coefficient UFO sightings patents, celestial phenomena patents, otherworldly inspiration human creativity

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

UFO sightings in Oregon
Detailed data title: UFO sightings reported in Oregon
Source: National UFO Reporting Center
See what else correlates with UFO sightings in Oregon

Patents granted in the US
Detailed data title: Total number of patents granted in the US
Source: USPTO
See what else correlates with Patents granted in the US

Correlation r = 0.9077341 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8239812 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Patents granted in the US) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., UFO sightings in Oregon) over the 46 years from 1975 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.3E-18. 0.0000000000000000033120018163
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 3.3E-16% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 301,932,201,570,212,032 random variables You don't actually need 301 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 45 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 45 because we have two variables measured over a period of 46 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.84, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
UFO sightings in Oregon (UFO sightings)2566567133634176562712163257100981109185871038010889758211117017922020915712193128224
Patents granted in the US (Patents granted)768107538869781705145241366170710646327661982726507724576862893858427210253399077106696107394109746113587113834121696124069163142169085175979183970184375187012181299157718196405182899185224191927244341247713276788302948326032325980333583351403339992391103388900




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2,5,6,6,5,6,7,1,3,3,6,3,4,1,7,6,5,6,2,7,12,16,32,57,100,98,110,91,85,87,103,80,108,89,75,82,111,170,179,220,209,157,121,93,128,224,])
array_2 = np.array([76810,75388,69781,70514,52413,66170,71064,63276,61982,72650,77245,76862,89385,84272,102533,99077,106696,107394,109746,113587,113834,121696,124069,163142,169085,175979,183970,184375,187012,181299,157718,196405,182899,185224,191927,244341,247713,276788,302948,326032,325980,333583,351403,339992,391103,388900,])
array_1_name = "UFO sightings in Oregon"
array_2_name = "Patents granted in the US"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 4121 · Black Variable ID: 1159 · Red Variable ID: 848
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0