about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,971 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in soybeans in Iowa and the second variable is Hollister retail store count worldwide.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the soybeans grew larger thanks to GMOs, they started demanding more fashionable clothing. This led to a global shortage of trendy apparel, prompting the rapid expansion of Hollister stores to meet the soybeans' sartorial needs. It seems the soybeans were really *growing* into their own unique sense of style, creating a new phenomenon called "agri-chic" that's sweeping the fashion world! So, it turns out, the key to Hollister's success wasn't just in the genes, but in the soy-jean-s.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie: Within a stunningly vibrant Iowa soybean field, rows of genetically modified soybeans stretch into the distance, their lush green leaves shimmering under the clear sky. Nearby, a quaint Hollister store stands amidst a bustling cityscape, its exterior reflecting the vibrant harmony of urban and rural life. A line of quirky, fashionable individuals eagerly waits outside, holding soy lattes and exuding a sense of contemporary energy as they anticipate the latest organic denim jeans. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in soybeans in Iowa and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: 3D Pixar Style Low poly An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Cubism Data cyber art
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in soybeans in Iowa and Hollister retail store count worldwide, in the following situation: Because the genetically modified soybeans in Iowa caused a surge in soy lattes, unleashing a wave of hipsters demanding organic denim. This led to an uptick in Hollister stores, because where else can you find jeans tight enough to cut off circulation to your skinny-jean-adapted legs? And the store's dim lighting helps to hide the shame of actually buying $50 T-shirts.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sunny Iowa soybean field, rows of genetically modified soybeans stretch into the distance, their lush green leaves shimmering under the clear sky. Nearby, a shiny new Hollister store stands amidst a bustling cityscape, its dimly lit interior adorned with racks of trendy denim. A line of hipsters eagerly waits outside, clutching soy lattes, as they eagerly browse for organic denim jeans, their stylishly skinny legs showcasing the latest fashion trend.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: In a sunny Iowa soybean field, rows of genetically modified soybeans stretch into the distance, their lush green leaves shimmering under the clear sky. Nearby, a shiny new Hollister store stands amidst a bustling cityscape, its dimly lit interior adorned with racks of trendy denim. A line of hipsters eagerly waits outside, clutching soy lattes, as they eagerly browse for organic denim jeans, their stylishly skinny legs showcasing the latest fashion trend. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie: Within a stunningly vibrant Iowa soybean field, rows of genetically modified soybeans stretch into the distance, their lush green leaves shimmering under the clear sky. Nearby, a quaint Hollister store stands amidst a bustling cityscape, its exterior reflecting the vibrant harmony of urban and rural life. A line of quirky, fashionable individuals eagerly waits outside, holding soy lattes and exuding a sense of contemporary energy as they anticipate the latest organic denim jeans.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in soybeans in Iowa caused Hollister retail store count worldwide to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
From Soybeans to Stores: The Curious Connection Between GMOs and Hollister Retail Expansion Worldwide

The International Journal of Agribusiness and Fashion Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Iowa and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9180114 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"From Soybeans to Stores: The Curious Connection Between GMOs and Hollister Retail Expansion Worldwide"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the apparent correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean production in Iowa and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores on a global scale. Using a comprehensive dataset from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a thorough analysis, which revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9180114 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2000 to 2022. While the existence of such a strong correlation may initially seem perplexing, our findings suggest that there may be more to this soybean-store connection than meets the eye. Join us as we delve into the unexpected world of soybean GMOs and Hollister retail expansion, where the roots of statistical significance intertwine with the branches of retail trends, yielding an unexpected and perhaps amusing harvest of insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Iowa and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Soybeans to Stores: The Curious Connection Between GMOs and Hollister Retail Expansion Worldwide"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the apparent correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean production in Iowa and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores on a global scale. Using a comprehensive dataset from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a thorough analysis, which revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9180114 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2000 to 2022. While the existence of such a strong correlation may initially seem perplexing, our findings suggest that there may be more to this soybean-store connection than meets the eye. Join us as we delve into the unexpected world of soybean GMOs and Hollister retail expansion, where the roots of statistical significance intertwine with the branches of retail trends, yielding an unexpected and perhaps amusing harvest of insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Genetic modification, or GMOs, in agricultural production has long been a topic of debate and discussion, with advocates and critics arguing fervently about its impact on human health, environmental sustainability, and, apparently, on retail expansion. While the link between GMOs in soybean cultivation and the global proliferation of Hollister retail stores may seem, for lack of a better term, 'out of left field,' our investigation indicates a rather surprising connection between these seemingly unrelated entities.

The idea of GMOs influencing the expansion of a trendy retail chain may boggle the mind, but as we dig into our analysis, we aim to unravel this enigmatic relationship and explore whether there's more to it than just a soy of statistical smokes and mirrors. In doing so, we hope to shed light on a rather unorthodox interplay between agricultural practices and sartorial spread, presenting our findings with a hint of humor and a dash of quirkiness to make this curious conundrum more digestible. So, fasten your seat belts and prepare for a rollercoaster ride through the surprising intersection of soy, statistics, and stylish apparel – it's bound to be a study as intriguing as it is unexpected.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Iowa and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Soybeans to Stores: The Curious Connection Between GMOs and Hollister Retail Expansion Worldwide"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the apparent correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean production in Iowa and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores on a global scale. Using a comprehensive dataset from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a thorough analysis, which revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9180114 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2000 to 2022. While the existence of such a strong correlation may initially seem perplexing, our findings suggest that there may be more to this soybean-store connection than meets the eye. Join us as we delve into the unexpected world of soybean GMOs and Hollister retail expansion, where the roots of statistical significance intertwine with the branches of retail trends, yielding an unexpected and perhaps amusing harvest of insights.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Genetic modification, or GMOs, in agricultural production has long been a topic of debate and discussion, with advocates and critics arguing fervently about its impact on human health, environmental sustainability, and, apparently, on retail expansion. While the link between GMOs in soybean cultivation and the global proliferation of Hollister retail stores may seem, for lack of a better term, 'out of left field,' our investigation indicates a rather surprising connection between these seemingly unrelated entities.
The idea of GMOs influencing the expansion of a trendy retail chain may boggle the mind, but as we dig into our analysis, we aim to unravel this enigmatic relationship and explore whether there's more to it than just a soy of statistical smokes and mirrors. In doing so, we hope to shed light on a rather unorthodox interplay between agricultural practices and sartorial spread, presenting our findings with a hint of humor and a dash of quirkiness to make this curious conundrum more digestible. So, fasten your seat belts and prepare for a rollercoaster ride through the surprising intersection of soy, statistics, and stylish apparel – it's bound to be a study as intriguing as it is unexpected.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature on the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean production in Iowa is abundant, as researchers have long been fascinated by the impact of agricultural practices on crop yield, environmental sustainability, and market trends. Smith et al. (2010) explored the effects of GMOs on soybean cultivation, highlighting the potential benefits and drawbacks of genetic modification in improving crop resistance and yield. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2015) investigated the socioeconomic implications of GMO adoption among soybean farmers in the Midwest, shedding light on the economic factors influencing the decision to embrace genetically modified seeds.

However, as we venture into the realm of retail expansion, the literature takes an unexpected turn. In "Beans to Jeans: A Comprehensive Study on the Intersection of Agriculture and Apparel," Lorem et al. (2019) delved into the surprising correlation between soybean production and the proliferation of fashion retail outlets, framing the discussion within the context of consumer behavior and agro-fashion dynamics. The authors present a compelling argument for the unanticipated synergy between agricultural commodities and fashion retail outlets, paving the way for our exploration into the intriguing relationship between GMOs and Hollister store count worldwide.

This unlikely juxtaposition of agricultural biotechnology and retail empire is reminiscent of the unconventional connections found in fiction literature. Works such as "The Soybean Conspiracy" by Aldous Harvest (2005) and "Denim Dreams and GMO Schemes" by J.K. Growing (2017) toy with the idea of clandestine alliances between agricultural products and global retail chains, offering whimsical interpretations of the interplay between nature's bounty and corporate expansion.

Drawing inspiration from the world of cinema, one cannot help but recall the offbeat charm of "Soybeanfield of Dreams" and "The Devil Wears Hollister." While these films may not directly address the correlation under study, they serve as a lighthearted reminder of the unexpected connections that can emerge in the most unlikely of contexts, much like the peculiar relationship between GMO soybeans and the global presence of Hollister stores.

As we navigate through the literature, it becomes evident that the intersection of GMO soybeans and retail expansion holds a peculiar allure, inviting us to approach this research endeavor with an open mind and perhaps a sprinkle of humor. In the following sections, we will dissect the existing knowledge base and embark on our own expedition to unravel the enigmatic bond between soybean genetics and sartorial enterprises, all while keeping our sense of curiosity and amusement in tow.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Iowa and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista . You used data from 2000 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Soybeans to Stores: The Curious Connection Between GMOs and Hollister Retail Expansion Worldwide"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the apparent correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean production in Iowa and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores on a global scale. Using a comprehensive dataset from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a thorough analysis, which revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9180114 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2000 to 2022. While the existence of such a strong correlation may initially seem perplexing, our findings suggest that there may be more to this soybean-store connection than meets the eye. Join us as we delve into the unexpected world of soybean GMOs and Hollister retail expansion, where the roots of statistical significance intertwine with the branches of retail trends, yielding an unexpected and perhaps amusing harvest of insights.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Genetic modification, or GMOs, in agricultural production has long been a topic of debate and discussion, with advocates and critics arguing fervently about its impact on human health, environmental sustainability, and, apparently, on retail expansion. While the link between GMOs in soybean cultivation and the global proliferation of Hollister retail stores may seem, for lack of a better term, 'out of left field,' our investigation indicates a rather surprising connection between these seemingly unrelated entities.
The idea of GMOs influencing the expansion of a trendy retail chain may boggle the mind, but as we dig into our analysis, we aim to unravel this enigmatic relationship and explore whether there's more to it than just a soy of statistical smokes and mirrors. In doing so, we hope to shed light on a rather unorthodox interplay between agricultural practices and sartorial spread, presenting our findings with a hint of humor and a dash of quirkiness to make this curious conundrum more digestible. So, fasten your seat belts and prepare for a rollercoaster ride through the surprising intersection of soy, statistics, and stylish apparel – it's bound to be a study as intriguing as it is unexpected.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To establish the linkage between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean production in Iowa and the expansion of Hollister retail stores globally, our research team embarked on a convoluted, yet systematically cheerful, journey. We combed through a vast ocean of data, navigating the choppy waves of internet repositories and casting our nets far and wide. Our primary sources entailed the revered archives of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the troves of statistical gems housed within Statista, where we attempted to separate the soybeans from the chaff of retail statistics.

Our methodological approach resembled a carefully orchestrated dance, twirling through the digital landscape as we sifted through data from the year 2000 to 2022. Through this process, we adopted a whimsical yet rigorous approach – tickling the keyboards of our computers to extract the tantalizing numbers and figures that would form the foundation of our analysis.

To analyze the relationship between GMO use in soybeans and the spread of Hollister retail stores, we engaged in a sequence of statistical acrobatics. First, we conducted a thorough examination of soybean production trends in Iowa, scrutinizing the evolution of GMO adoption rates with the scrutiny of a discerning connoisseur. Then, like intrepid explorers, we ventured into the global realm of Hollister retail stores, meticulously counting their proliferation across geographies, all the while maintaining a lighthearted spirit to counteract the intensity of our numerical escapades.

Once armed with this copious trove of data, we deployed a barrage of statistical weapons that would make even the most seasoned mathematician blush. Regression analysis, correlation coefficients, and p-values were wielded like the tools of a magical potion maker, concocting spells of significance and coherence from the raw ingredients of our numerical cornucopia.

Finally, with the spirit of adventurers returning from an enthralling expedition, we presented our observations and insights, with a touch of whimsy and humor, in the hope that our curious escapade through the intersection of soybean GMOs and Hollister retail expansion would entertain and enlighten our esteemed readers.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Iowa and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista .

For the time period 2000 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9180114, r-squared of 0.8427449, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Soybeans to Stores: The Curious Connection Between GMOs and Hollister Retail Expansion Worldwide"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the apparent correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean production in Iowa and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores on a global scale. Using a comprehensive dataset from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a thorough analysis, which revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9180114 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2000 to 2022. While the existence of such a strong correlation may initially seem perplexing, our findings suggest that there may be more to this soybean-store connection than meets the eye. Join us as we delve into the unexpected world of soybean GMOs and Hollister retail expansion, where the roots of statistical significance intertwine with the branches of retail trends, yielding an unexpected and perhaps amusing harvest of insights.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Genetic modification, or GMOs, in agricultural production has long been a topic of debate and discussion, with advocates and critics arguing fervently about its impact on human health, environmental sustainability, and, apparently, on retail expansion. While the link between GMOs in soybean cultivation and the global proliferation of Hollister retail stores may seem, for lack of a better term, 'out of left field,' our investigation indicates a rather surprising connection between these seemingly unrelated entities.
The idea of GMOs influencing the expansion of a trendy retail chain may boggle the mind, but as we dig into our analysis, we aim to unravel this enigmatic relationship and explore whether there's more to it than just a soy of statistical smokes and mirrors. In doing so, we hope to shed light on a rather unorthodox interplay between agricultural practices and sartorial spread, presenting our findings with a hint of humor and a dash of quirkiness to make this curious conundrum more digestible. So, fasten your seat belts and prepare for a rollercoaster ride through the surprising intersection of soy, statistics, and stylish apparel – it's bound to be a study as intriguing as it is unexpected.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data collected revealed a striking correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean production in Iowa and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. The correlation coefficient of 0.9180114 with an r-squared value of 0.8427449 demonstrates a remarkably strong association between these variables. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 reinforces the significance of this relationship, indicating that the findings are unlikely to have occurred by chance.

Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the robust positive correlation between the utilization of GMOs in soybean farming in Iowa and the expansion of Hollister retail outlets on a global scale. The plot unequivocally showcases the trend, leaving little room for doubt regarding the curious connection we have uncovered.

While the mere notion of GMOs influencing the proliferation of a fashion-forward retail chain may prompt a raised eyebrow or two, our results compel a closer examination of this unanticipated relationship. The implications of these findings suggest a potential intersection of agricultural practices and retail expansion that transcends conventional understanding, serving as a whimsical reminder of the surprising interconnections permeating our complex world. It appears that the soybeans and stylish apparel are not as distant as one might presume, and this unexpected correlation surely adds a touch of intrigue to the landscape of agricultural and retail dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Iowa and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"From Soybeans to Stores: The Curious Connection Between GMOs and Hollister Retail Expansion Worldwide"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the apparent correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean production in Iowa and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores on a global scale. Using a comprehensive dataset from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a thorough analysis, which revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9180114 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2000 to 2022. While the existence of such a strong correlation may initially seem perplexing, our findings suggest that there may be more to this soybean-store connection than meets the eye. Join us as we delve into the unexpected world of soybean GMOs and Hollister retail expansion, where the roots of statistical significance intertwine with the branches of retail trends, yielding an unexpected and perhaps amusing harvest of insights.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature on the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean production in Iowa is abundant, as researchers have long been fascinated by the impact of agricultural practices on crop yield, environmental sustainability, and market trends. Smith et al. (2010) explored the effects of GMOs on soybean cultivation, highlighting the potential benefits and drawbacks of genetic modification in improving crop resistance and yield. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2015) investigated the socioeconomic implications of GMO adoption among soybean farmers in the Midwest, shedding light on the economic factors influencing the decision to embrace genetically modified seeds.
However, as we venture into the realm of retail expansion, the literature takes an unexpected turn. In "Beans to Jeans: A Comprehensive Study on the Intersection of Agriculture and Apparel," Lorem et al. (2019) delved into the surprising correlation between soybean production and the proliferation of fashion retail outlets, framing the discussion within the context of consumer behavior and agro-fashion dynamics. The authors present a compelling argument for the unanticipated synergy between agricultural commodities and fashion retail outlets, paving the way for our exploration into the intriguing relationship between GMOs and Hollister store count worldwide.
This unlikely juxtaposition of agricultural biotechnology and retail empire is reminiscent of the unconventional connections found in fiction literature. Works such as "The Soybean Conspiracy" by Aldous Harvest (2005) and "Denim Dreams and GMO Schemes" by J.K. Growing (2017) toy with the idea of clandestine alliances between agricultural products and global retail chains, offering whimsical interpretations of the interplay between nature's bounty and corporate expansion.
Drawing inspiration from the world of cinema, one cannot help but recall the offbeat charm of "Soybeanfield of Dreams" and "The Devil Wears Hollister." While these films may not directly address the correlation under study, they serve as a lighthearted reminder of the unexpected connections that can emerge in the most unlikely of contexts, much like the peculiar relationship between GMO soybeans and the global presence of Hollister stores.
As we navigate through the literature, it becomes evident that the intersection of GMO soybeans and retail expansion holds a peculiar allure, inviting us to approach this research endeavor with an open mind and perhaps a sprinkle of humor. In the following sections, we will dissect the existing knowledge base and embark on our own expedition to unravel the enigmatic bond between soybean genetics and sartorial enterprises, all while keeping our sense of curiosity and amusement in tow.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data collected revealed a striking correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean production in Iowa and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. The correlation coefficient of 0.9180114 with an r-squared value of 0.8427449 demonstrates a remarkably strong association between these variables. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 reinforces the significance of this relationship, indicating that the findings are unlikely to have occurred by chance.
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the robust positive correlation between the utilization of GMOs in soybean farming in Iowa and the expansion of Hollister retail outlets on a global scale. The plot unequivocally showcases the trend, leaving little room for doubt regarding the curious connection we have uncovered.
While the mere notion of GMOs influencing the proliferation of a fashion-forward retail chain may prompt a raised eyebrow or two, our results compel a closer examination of this unanticipated relationship. The implications of these findings suggest a potential intersection of agricultural practices and retail expansion that transcends conventional understanding, serving as a whimsical reminder of the surprising interconnections permeating our complex world. It appears that the soybeans and stylish apparel are not as distant as one might presume, and this unexpected correlation surely adds a touch of intrigue to the landscape of agricultural and retail dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study not only substantiate the prior research on the impact of GMO soybeans in Iowa but also shed light on the unexpected connection with Hollister retail expansion worldwide. The correlation coefficient of 0.9180114 points to a remarkably strong association between GMO use in soybean farming and the proliferation of Hollister stores, further confirming Lorem et al.'s (2019) pioneering work on the intersection of agricultural commodities and fashion retail. It appears that the roots of GMO soybeans delve deeper into the ground of apparel retail than previously imagined, sprouting a harvest of insights that extends beyond the conventional boundaries of agricultural and retail dynamics.

Our results elevate the offhand remarks found in works such as "The Soybean Conspiracy" by Aldous Harvest (2005) and "Denim Dreams and GMO Schemes" by J.K. Growing (2017) to a level of scientific inquiry, as these seemingly fanciful speculations on clandestine alliances now find empirical support. While these findings may provoke a chuckle or two, they beckon us to acknowledge the whimsicality underlying our interconnected world, where soybean genetics and sartorial empires intertwine in unanticipated ways.

The unexpected correlation uncovered in our study invites contemplation on the improbable connections that weave through the fabric of our agricultural and retail landscapes. It appears the seeds of genetic modification may have sown more than just crop improvements, as they appear to have cultivated a fertile ground for the expansion of a fashion retail empire. Our findings not only contribute to the scholarly understanding of GMO soybeans but also add a touch of intrigue and amusement to the discourse on agricultural and retail relationships.

In unraveling this enigmatic bond, our study beckons researchers to approach their work with an open mind and perhaps a sprinkling of humor, recognizing that the strangest of relationships may yield fascinating and statistically significant discoveries. As we navigate through this unexpected terrain, it becomes evident that the soybeans-to-stores connection not only warrants scientific scrutiny but also raises a whimsical eyebrow at the peculiar and often amusing interconnections that abound in our intricate world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Iowa and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"From Soybeans to Stores: The Curious Connection Between GMOs and Hollister Retail Expansion Worldwide"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the apparent correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean production in Iowa and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores on a global scale. Using a comprehensive dataset from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a thorough analysis, which revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9180114 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2000 to 2022. While the existence of such a strong correlation may initially seem perplexing, our findings suggest that there may be more to this soybean-store connection than meets the eye. Join us as we delve into the unexpected world of soybean GMOs and Hollister retail expansion, where the roots of statistical significance intertwine with the branches of retail trends, yielding an unexpected and perhaps amusing harvest of insights.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Genetic modification, or GMOs, in agricultural production has long been a topic of debate and discussion, with advocates and critics arguing fervently about its impact on human health, environmental sustainability, and, apparently, on retail expansion. While the link between GMOs in soybean cultivation and the global proliferation of Hollister retail stores may seem, for lack of a better term, 'out of left field,' our investigation indicates a rather surprising connection between these seemingly unrelated entities.
The idea of GMOs influencing the expansion of a trendy retail chain may boggle the mind, but as we dig into our analysis, we aim to unravel this enigmatic relationship and explore whether there's more to it than just a soy of statistical smokes and mirrors. In doing so, we hope to shed light on a rather unorthodox interplay between agricultural practices and sartorial spread, presenting our findings with a hint of humor and a dash of quirkiness to make this curious conundrum more digestible. So, fasten your seat belts and prepare for a rollercoaster ride through the surprising intersection of soy, statistics, and stylish apparel – it's bound to be a study as intriguing as it is unexpected.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data collected revealed a striking correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean production in Iowa and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. The correlation coefficient of 0.9180114 with an r-squared value of 0.8427449 demonstrates a remarkably strong association between these variables. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 reinforces the significance of this relationship, indicating that the findings are unlikely to have occurred by chance.
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the robust positive correlation between the utilization of GMOs in soybean farming in Iowa and the expansion of Hollister retail outlets on a global scale. The plot unequivocally showcases the trend, leaving little room for doubt regarding the curious connection we have uncovered.
While the mere notion of GMOs influencing the proliferation of a fashion-forward retail chain may prompt a raised eyebrow or two, our results compel a closer examination of this unanticipated relationship. The implications of these findings suggest a potential intersection of agricultural practices and retail expansion that transcends conventional understanding, serving as a whimsical reminder of the surprising interconnections permeating our complex world. It appears that the soybeans and stylish apparel are not as distant as one might presume, and this unexpected correlation surely adds a touch of intrigue to the landscape of agricultural and retail dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study presents compelling evidence of a remarkably strong correlation between the use of GMOs in soybean production in Iowa and the expansion of Hollister retail stores worldwide. While the statistical significance of this relationship cannot be denied, it is essential to approach these findings with a tinge of lighthearted skepticism, akin to shopping for trendy attire during a sale – always an exciting prospect, yet one might wonder about the true value.

The unexpected convergence of soybean genetics and retail enclaves serves as a whimsical reminder of the serendipitous nature of statistical exploration. As we navigate through the labyrinthine corridors of agricultural and commercial landscapes, we cannot help but marvel at the unforeseen intersections that emerge, much like stumbling upon a surprising fashion find in the clearance section.

Although our findings may provoke a chuckle or two, they also underscore the unpredictable tapestry of interconnectedness woven throughout our world. It seems that the seeds of statistical significance, sown in the fertile fields of soy cultivation, have borne unexpected fruits in the form of a global retail network, reminding us that in the quirky realm of statistical relationships, one can never be too sure what surprising patterns may sprout next.

In light of these compelling discoveries, we are confident in asserting that further research in this area may yield diminishing returns, much like attempting to find the ideal pair of jeans after already discovering the perfect fit. Therefore, we advocate for embracing the delightful peculiarity of this correlation and allowing it to stand as a testament to the delightful strangeness pervading our universe. It appears that the soybeans have indeed sown their whimsical influence far and wide, and perhaps it is best to let this unexpected correlation catch a well-deserved breath – just like taking a satisfying pause after an eventful shopping spree.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From Soybeans to Stores: The Curious Connection Between GMOs and Hollister Retail Expansion Worldwide. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Agribusiness and Fashion Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From Soybeans to Stores: The Curious Connection Between GMOs and Hollister Retail Expansion Worldwide. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Agricultural and Consumer Trends Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From Soybeans to Stores: The Curious Connection Between GMOs and Hollister Retail Expansion Worldwide with an abstract of This study investigates the apparent correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean production in Iowa and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores on a global scale. Using a comprehensive dataset from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a thorough analysis, which revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9180114 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2000 to 2022. While the existence of such a strong correlation may initially seem perplexing, our findings suggest that there may be more to this soybean-store connection than meets the eye. Join us as we delve into the unexpected world of soybean GMOs and Hollister retail expansion, where the roots of statistical significance intertwine with the branches of retail trends, yielding an unexpected and perhaps amusing harvest of insights.

ChatGPT:

GMO soybeans, Hollister retail expansion, correlation analysis, soybean production in Iowa, USDA dataset, Statista, global retail trends, genetically modified organisms, retail store proliferation, GMO impact on retail industry

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in soybeans in Iowa
Detailed data title: Percent of soybeans planted in Iowa that are genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in soybeans in Iowa

Hollister retail store count worldwide
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Hollister retail store count worldwide

Correlation r = 0.9180114 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8427449 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hollister retail store count worldwide) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in soybeans in Iowa) over the 23 years from 2000 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.8E-10. 0.0000000006818719432595937000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 6.8E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,466,551,029 random variables You don't actually need 1 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.81, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in soybeans in Iowa (GMO soybeans %)5973758489919194959496979793979697949594939797
Hollister retail store count worldwide (Store count)53288167249309383447510525540571589587568553543538542546497505529




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([59,73,75,84,89,91,91,94,95,94,96,97,97,93,97,96,97,94,95,94,93,97,97,])
array_2 = np.array([5,32,88,167,249,309,383,447,510,525,540,571,589,587,568,553,543,538,542,546,497,505,529,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in soybeans in Iowa"
array_2_name = "Hollister retail store count worldwide"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 3971 · Black Variable ID: 832 · Red Variable ID: 176
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0