about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,959 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name James and the second variable is The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As the popularity of the name James waned, so did the interest in 'jamming' things together, including iron and rebar. It seems the name held the 'key' to keeping the job market 'bonded' in Louisiana, but now it's a 'rebar-bell' situation for the workforce. Who knew a name could have such a 'reinforcing' effect on a whole industry?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Using a photorealistic style, I imagine an image that captures the poignant scene of a bustling city in Louisiana. The foreground features a stark, unfinished construction site with idle hard hats and tool belts hanging on a weathered fence. The muted colors and attention to detail highlight the sense of abandonment and loss. In the background, the elementary school's facade and a list of students are visible, emphasizing the declining number of boys named James and the impact on the local labor force. The imagery evokes a sense of nostalgia and reflects the changing demographics of the workforce in the area. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name James and The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy graphics Glitch art Voxel art Photorealism Cubism
ChatGPT: Photorealism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name James and The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana, in the following situation: Because fewer parents were naming their children James, there were fewer children growing up to become reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana. Without the influx of new Jameses entering the workforce, there was a noticeable decrease in the number of workers in that field. It turns out the workforce was heavily reliant on the continued popularity of the name James for its labor supply!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling city in Louisiana, a construction site stood silent and unfinished. A line of hard hats and tool belts hung idly on a fence, waiting for their owners. In the nearby elementary school, the list of students showed fewer and fewer boys named James, and the classrooms were missing the future iron and rebar workers. The once-popular name James played a crucial role in the local labor force, and its declining popularity had left a noticeable gap in the construction industry.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Photorealism ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling city in Louisiana, a construction site stood silent and unfinished. A line of hard hats and tool belts hung idly on a fence, waiting for their owners. In the nearby elementary school, the list of students showed fewer and fewer boys named James, and the classrooms were missing the future iron and rebar workers. The once-popular name James played a crucial role in the local labor force, and its declining popularity had left a noticeable gap in the construction industry. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Using a photorealistic style, I imagine an image that captures the poignant scene of a bustling city in Louisiana. The foreground features a stark, unfinished construction site with idle hard hats and tool belts hanging on a weathered fence. The muted colors and attention to detail highlight the sense of abandonment and loss. In the background, the elementary school's facade and a list of students are visible, emphasizing the declining number of boys named James and the impact on the local labor force. The imagery evokes a sense of nostalgia and reflects the changing demographics of the workforce in the area.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name James caused The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Jovial James: Juggling Jackhammers in Jambalaya State - A Merriment of Monikers and Manual Labor

The Journal of Whimsical Workforce Studies

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name James and The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8082196 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Jovial James: Juggling Jackhammers in Jambalaya State - A Merriment of Monikers and Manual Labor

[[ABSTRACT]]
The perennial pondering of the potential preponderance of the popularity of the first name James and the presence of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana has plagued scholars for ages. This study aims to elucidate this perplexing correlation, bringing together data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our findings establish a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8082196 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2022. With statistically significant results, we can confidently assert that there is a definite link between the proliferation of the name James and the influx of ironworkers in the Pelican State.

As we delved into the data, we couldn't help but marvel at the coincidence of the Jameses and the jacks of all trades in Louisiana. Indeed, one might jest that the name James not only symbolizes valiant victory in the face of adversity but also resonates with the clang of hammers on hardened steel. Our study provides compelling evidence that the more Jameses there are, the more fervently the iron and rebar workers in Louisiana seem to flourish.

In conclusion, our research sheds light on a curious connection that has long evaded scrutiny. While we tread lightly in attributing the popularity of a name to labor market trends, the data speaks for itself—Jameses and jacks of all trades in Louisiana are inextricably entwined. As we bid adieu, we leave you with a dad joke fitting for this whimsical exploration: "Why did the ironworker go to therapy? Because he had too many rebar-ative thoughts!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name James and The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Jovial James: Juggling Jackhammers in Jambalaya State - A Merriment of Monikers and Manual Labor

[[ABSTRACT]]
The perennial pondering of the potential preponderance of the popularity of the first name James and the presence of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana has plagued scholars for ages. This study aims to elucidate this perplexing correlation, bringing together data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our findings establish a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8082196 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2022. With statistically significant results, we can confidently assert that there is a definite link between the proliferation of the name James and the influx of ironworkers in the Pelican State.

As we delved into the data, we couldn't help but marvel at the coincidence of the Jameses and the jacks of all trades in Louisiana. Indeed, one might jest that the name James not only symbolizes valiant victory in the face of adversity but also resonates with the clang of hammers on hardened steel. Our study provides compelling evidence that the more Jameses there are, the more fervently the iron and rebar workers in Louisiana seem to flourish.

In conclusion, our research sheds light on a curious connection that has long evaded scrutiny. While we tread lightly in attributing the popularity of a name to labor market trends, the data speaks for itself—Jameses and jacks of all trades in Louisiana are inextricably entwined. As we bid adieu, we leave you with a dad joke fitting for this whimsical exploration: "Why did the ironworker go to therapy? Because he had too many rebar-ative thoughts!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between socioeconomic factors and nomenclature has long been a subject of scholarly curiosity. This study delves into the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name James and the prevalence of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana. The whimsical and wondrous journey we embarked upon led us to uncover an unexpected connection, which we are excited to unravel within the following pages.

As we set out to tackle this enigmatic association, we couldn't help but be reminded of an ironworking dad joke: "Why did the ironworker bring a ladder to work? Because he heard the steels were high!" A hearty chuckle aside, the levity of such jests belies the serious inquiry at hand.

The state of Louisiana, known for its vibrant culture and eclectic mix of influences, provides a captivating backdrop for our investigation. The question at the heart of our study is whether the proliferation of the moniker "James" correlates with an upsurge in the number of ironworkers shaping the structural landscape of the Pelican State. This veritable jambalaya of a question piqued our interest and spurred our meticulous analysis of data spanning nearly two decades.

One cannot help but appreciate the delightful alliteration and consonance of "James" and "jacks of all trades," akin to the groove and rhythm of a well-coordinated construction site. The intriguing paradox of a name steeped in tradition and a profession that forges the future is akin to a dance between the timeless and the modern—akin to a tango of titanic talents.

Amidst the sea of data and statistical analyses, we couldn't resist a dad joke beckoning from the depths: "What did the enthusiastic ironworker say? 'I'm just so rebar-sive!'" Truly, the merriment of monikers and manual labor seems to manifest itself even in the nooks and crannies of academic exploration.

Stay tuned for the unfolding of our findings, as we unravel this captivating correlation and bid adieu with a parting pun: "Why did the James become an ironworker? Because he wanted to be a real 'steel' in his field!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name James and The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Jovial James: Juggling Jackhammers in Jambalaya State - A Merriment of Monikers and Manual Labor

[[ABSTRACT]]
The perennial pondering of the potential preponderance of the popularity of the first name James and the presence of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana has plagued scholars for ages. This study aims to elucidate this perplexing correlation, bringing together data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our findings establish a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8082196 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2022. With statistically significant results, we can confidently assert that there is a definite link between the proliferation of the name James and the influx of ironworkers in the Pelican State.

As we delved into the data, we couldn't help but marvel at the coincidence of the Jameses and the jacks of all trades in Louisiana. Indeed, one might jest that the name James not only symbolizes valiant victory in the face of adversity but also resonates with the clang of hammers on hardened steel. Our study provides compelling evidence that the more Jameses there are, the more fervently the iron and rebar workers in Louisiana seem to flourish.

In conclusion, our research sheds light on a curious connection that has long evaded scrutiny. While we tread lightly in attributing the popularity of a name to labor market trends, the data speaks for itself—Jameses and jacks of all trades in Louisiana are inextricably entwined. As we bid adieu, we leave you with a dad joke fitting for this whimsical exploration: "Why did the ironworker go to therapy? Because he had too many rebar-ative thoughts!"

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between socioeconomic factors and nomenclature has long been a subject of scholarly curiosity. This study delves into the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name James and the prevalence of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana. The whimsical and wondrous journey we embarked upon led us to uncover an unexpected connection, which we are excited to unravel within the following pages.
As we set out to tackle this enigmatic association, we couldn't help but be reminded of an ironworking dad joke: "Why did the ironworker bring a ladder to work? Because he heard the steels were high!" A hearty chuckle aside, the levity of such jests belies the serious inquiry at hand.
The state of Louisiana, known for its vibrant culture and eclectic mix of influences, provides a captivating backdrop for our investigation. The question at the heart of our study is whether the proliferation of the moniker "James" correlates with an upsurge in the number of ironworkers shaping the structural landscape of the Pelican State. This veritable jambalaya of a question piqued our interest and spurred our meticulous analysis of data spanning nearly two decades.
One cannot help but appreciate the delightful alliteration and consonance of "James" and "jacks of all trades," akin to the groove and rhythm of a well-coordinated construction site. The intriguing paradox of a name steeped in tradition and a profession that forges the future is akin to a dance between the timeless and the modern—akin to a tango of titanic talents.
Amidst the sea of data and statistical analyses, we couldn't resist a dad joke beckoning from the depths: "What did the enthusiastic ironworker say? 'I'm just so rebar-sive!'" Truly, the merriment of monikers and manual labor seems to manifest itself even in the nooks and crannies of academic exploration.
Stay tuned for the unfolding of our findings, as we unravel this captivating correlation and bid adieu with a parting pun: "Why did the James become an ironworker? Because he wanted to be a real 'steel' in his field!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between names and occupations has been a subject of fascination for researchers across various disciplines. Smith (2010) explored the connection between first names and career choices, shedding light on the subconscious influence of nomenclature. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) investigated the impact of names on professional identity, uncovering intriguing patterns in occupational preferences. However, our study delves into a peculiar and specific nexus - the correlation between the popularity of the first name James and the prevalence of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana.

In "The Name Effect," the authors delve into the psychological impact of names on individuals, positing that the choice of a name can subconsciously shape one's career path and professional inclinations. This certainly sheds light on the potential influence of the name James on the career choices of aspiring ironworkers.

Turning to more whimsical literary sources, "The Iron Age: History of Reinforced Steel" offers an in-depth exploration of the evolution of ironworking, providing valuable context for our inquiry. Meanwhile, "The Rebar Chronicles" presents a fictional account of a group of ironworkers, perhaps offering a more anecdotal glimpse into the daily lives of these laborers.

In a less conventional approach, several movies provide a tangential connection to our research. "Iron Man" showcases the prowess of a modern-day metalworker, albeit in the form of a superhero. Similarly, "Rebar Revolution" is a fictional film centered around the trials and triumphs of a group of ironworkers, offering a more dramatic portrayal of the profession.

Now, back to our study, where the correlation between the proliferation of the name James and the prevalence of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana has piqued our curiosity. As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we are reminded of a fitting dad joke: "Why did the ironworker refuse to take a break? Because he couldn't stop rebar-ing about his work!" Indeed, the merriment of monikers and manual labor seems to echo through our exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name James and The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Jovial James: Juggling Jackhammers in Jambalaya State - A Merriment of Monikers and Manual Labor

[[ABSTRACT]]
The perennial pondering of the potential preponderance of the popularity of the first name James and the presence of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana has plagued scholars for ages. This study aims to elucidate this perplexing correlation, bringing together data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our findings establish a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8082196 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2022. With statistically significant results, we can confidently assert that there is a definite link between the proliferation of the name James and the influx of ironworkers in the Pelican State.

As we delved into the data, we couldn't help but marvel at the coincidence of the Jameses and the jacks of all trades in Louisiana. Indeed, one might jest that the name James not only symbolizes valiant victory in the face of adversity but also resonates with the clang of hammers on hardened steel. Our study provides compelling evidence that the more Jameses there are, the more fervently the iron and rebar workers in Louisiana seem to flourish.

In conclusion, our research sheds light on a curious connection that has long evaded scrutiny. While we tread lightly in attributing the popularity of a name to labor market trends, the data speaks for itself—Jameses and jacks of all trades in Louisiana are inextricably entwined. As we bid adieu, we leave you with a dad joke fitting for this whimsical exploration: "Why did the ironworker go to therapy? Because he had too many rebar-ative thoughts!"

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between socioeconomic factors and nomenclature has long been a subject of scholarly curiosity. This study delves into the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name James and the prevalence of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana. The whimsical and wondrous journey we embarked upon led us to uncover an unexpected connection, which we are excited to unravel within the following pages.
As we set out to tackle this enigmatic association, we couldn't help but be reminded of an ironworking dad joke: "Why did the ironworker bring a ladder to work? Because he heard the steels were high!" A hearty chuckle aside, the levity of such jests belies the serious inquiry at hand.
The state of Louisiana, known for its vibrant culture and eclectic mix of influences, provides a captivating backdrop for our investigation. The question at the heart of our study is whether the proliferation of the moniker "James" correlates with an upsurge in the number of ironworkers shaping the structural landscape of the Pelican State. This veritable jambalaya of a question piqued our interest and spurred our meticulous analysis of data spanning nearly two decades.
One cannot help but appreciate the delightful alliteration and consonance of "James" and "jacks of all trades," akin to the groove and rhythm of a well-coordinated construction site. The intriguing paradox of a name steeped in tradition and a profession that forges the future is akin to a dance between the timeless and the modern—akin to a tango of titanic talents.
Amidst the sea of data and statistical analyses, we couldn't resist a dad joke beckoning from the depths: "What did the enthusiastic ironworker say? 'I'm just so rebar-sive!'" Truly, the merriment of monikers and manual labor seems to manifest itself even in the nooks and crannies of academic exploration.
Stay tuned for the unfolding of our findings, as we unravel this captivating correlation and bid adieu with a parting pun: "Why did the James become an ironworker? Because he wanted to be a real 'steel' in his field!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on our merry investigation, we leveraged a combination of data collection and analytical methods that could rival the craftsmanship of a seasoned ironworker. Our initial step involved gathering data on the popularity of the first name James from the US Social Security Administration. We then waded through the Bureau of Labor Statistics' troves of employment data to ascertain the number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in the charming confines of Louisiana. Much like precision welding, our data collection process required meticulous attention to detail and a touch of whimsy.

With our dataset in hand, we set out to examine the temporal patterns of the name James and the workforce of iron and rebar aficionados. Mind you, the convergence of these disparate elements was akin to attempting to balance a sledgehammer on a tightrope, but we persevered nonetheless.

Employing a series of statistical analyses, we calculated robust measures such as correlation coefficients and p-values to quantify the relationship between the popularity of the name James and the presence of ironworkers in the state of Louisiana. We also dabbled in time series analyses to uncover potential trends that might have otherwise eluded us. It was a bit like navigating through a jungle of jumbled data—pith helmet not included, but a sense of humor absolutely necessary.

Our series of regressions and modeling techniques might have seemed as daunting as untangling a knotted mess of reinforced steel, but fear not, dear reader, for we navigated the statistical labyrinth with the grace of a ballerina in steel-toed boots.

We then conducted sensitivity analyses to ensure the robustness of our findings, akin to examining the sturdiness of a freshly erected steel frame under various environmental stressors.

Our methods may have bordered on the unorthodox at times, but much like the offbeat charm of a dad joke, they added a dash of intrigue to our academic odyssey.

As we wrap up this section, here's a fitting dad joke to buoy your spirits: "Why did the ironworker bring a pencil to work? In case he needed to draw some steel!" Remember, a good laugh is as essential to research as steel is to construction!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name James and The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8082196, r-squared of 0.6532188, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Jovial James: Juggling Jackhammers in Jambalaya State - A Merriment of Monikers and Manual Labor

[[ABSTRACT]]
The perennial pondering of the potential preponderance of the popularity of the first name James and the presence of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana has plagued scholars for ages. This study aims to elucidate this perplexing correlation, bringing together data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our findings establish a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8082196 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2022. With statistically significant results, we can confidently assert that there is a definite link between the proliferation of the name James and the influx of ironworkers in the Pelican State.

As we delved into the data, we couldn't help but marvel at the coincidence of the Jameses and the jacks of all trades in Louisiana. Indeed, one might jest that the name James not only symbolizes valiant victory in the face of adversity but also resonates with the clang of hammers on hardened steel. Our study provides compelling evidence that the more Jameses there are, the more fervently the iron and rebar workers in Louisiana seem to flourish.

In conclusion, our research sheds light on a curious connection that has long evaded scrutiny. While we tread lightly in attributing the popularity of a name to labor market trends, the data speaks for itself—Jameses and jacks of all trades in Louisiana are inextricably entwined. As we bid adieu, we leave you with a dad joke fitting for this whimsical exploration: "Why did the ironworker go to therapy? Because he had too many rebar-ative thoughts!"

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between socioeconomic factors and nomenclature has long been a subject of scholarly curiosity. This study delves into the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name James and the prevalence of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana. The whimsical and wondrous journey we embarked upon led us to uncover an unexpected connection, which we are excited to unravel within the following pages.
As we set out to tackle this enigmatic association, we couldn't help but be reminded of an ironworking dad joke: "Why did the ironworker bring a ladder to work? Because he heard the steels were high!" A hearty chuckle aside, the levity of such jests belies the serious inquiry at hand.
The state of Louisiana, known for its vibrant culture and eclectic mix of influences, provides a captivating backdrop for our investigation. The question at the heart of our study is whether the proliferation of the moniker "James" correlates with an upsurge in the number of ironworkers shaping the structural landscape of the Pelican State. This veritable jambalaya of a question piqued our interest and spurred our meticulous analysis of data spanning nearly two decades.
One cannot help but appreciate the delightful alliteration and consonance of "James" and "jacks of all trades," akin to the groove and rhythm of a well-coordinated construction site. The intriguing paradox of a name steeped in tradition and a profession that forges the future is akin to a dance between the timeless and the modern—akin to a tango of titanic talents.
Amidst the sea of data and statistical analyses, we couldn't resist a dad joke beckoning from the depths: "What did the enthusiastic ironworker say? 'I'm just so rebar-sive!'" Truly, the merriment of monikers and manual labor seems to manifest itself even in the nooks and crannies of academic exploration.
Stay tuned for the unfolding of our findings, as we unravel this captivating correlation and bid adieu with a parting pun: "Why did the James become an ironworker? Because he wanted to be a real 'steel' in his field!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of data gathered from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name James and the number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana. Over the time period of 2003 to 2022, our research uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8082196, with an r-squared value of 0.6532188 and a p-value less than 0.01. This statistically significant connection validates the long-suspected relationship between nomenclature and labor trends, affirming the profound impact of names on occupational dynamics. It seems that James is not only a popular name but also a harbinger of industrial endeavors in the jazzy state of Louisiana.

Amidst the sea of data, our findings evoke the whimsical image of a dance between the namesake James and the clang of hammers, a delightful jest that perhaps only an ironworker-dad could appreciate. The uncanny correlation between the proliferation of James and the proliferation of iron and rebar workers in Louisiana certainly gives new meaning to the term "ironclad evidence." It appears that the moniker James has cemented its place not only in popular culture but also in the structural landscape of the Pelican State.

Figure 1 (see below) illustrates the strong correlation between the popularity of the name James and the number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana. The scatterplot unmistakably portrays the upward trajectory of both variables, leaving little room for doubt regarding the intertwined fate of Jameses and jacks of all trades in the Bayou State. One might jest that where there's a James, there's a way for ironworking thrives.

In conclusion, our research not only illuminates the quirky correlation between the moniker "James" and the industrious spirit of iron and rebar workers in Louisiana, but also adds a touch of mirth to the realm of statistical inquiry. As we bid adieu to this riveting exploration, we leave you with a fitting dad joke: "Why did the ironworker refuse to take a nap? Because he didn't want to re-bar himself from the world!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name James and The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Jovial James: Juggling Jackhammers in Jambalaya State - A Merriment of Monikers and Manual Labor

[[ABSTRACT]]
The perennial pondering of the potential preponderance of the popularity of the first name James and the presence of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana has plagued scholars for ages. This study aims to elucidate this perplexing correlation, bringing together data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our findings establish a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8082196 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2022. With statistically significant results, we can confidently assert that there is a definite link between the proliferation of the name James and the influx of ironworkers in the Pelican State.

As we delved into the data, we couldn't help but marvel at the coincidence of the Jameses and the jacks of all trades in Louisiana. Indeed, one might jest that the name James not only symbolizes valiant victory in the face of adversity but also resonates with the clang of hammers on hardened steel. Our study provides compelling evidence that the more Jameses there are, the more fervently the iron and rebar workers in Louisiana seem to flourish.

In conclusion, our research sheds light on a curious connection that has long evaded scrutiny. While we tread lightly in attributing the popularity of a name to labor market trends, the data speaks for itself—Jameses and jacks of all trades in Louisiana are inextricably entwined. As we bid adieu, we leave you with a dad joke fitting for this whimsical exploration: "Why did the ironworker go to therapy? Because he had too many rebar-ative thoughts!"

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between names and occupations has been a subject of fascination for researchers across various disciplines. Smith (2010) explored the connection between first names and career choices, shedding light on the subconscious influence of nomenclature. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) investigated the impact of names on professional identity, uncovering intriguing patterns in occupational preferences. However, our study delves into a peculiar and specific nexus - the correlation between the popularity of the first name James and the prevalence of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana.
In "The Name Effect," the authors delve into the psychological impact of names on individuals, positing that the choice of a name can subconsciously shape one's career path and professional inclinations. This certainly sheds light on the potential influence of the name James on the career choices of aspiring ironworkers.
Turning to more whimsical literary sources, "The Iron Age: History of Reinforced Steel" offers an in-depth exploration of the evolution of ironworking, providing valuable context for our inquiry. Meanwhile, "The Rebar Chronicles" presents a fictional account of a group of ironworkers, perhaps offering a more anecdotal glimpse into the daily lives of these laborers.
In a less conventional approach, several movies provide a tangential connection to our research. "Iron Man" showcases the prowess of a modern-day metalworker, albeit in the form of a superhero. Similarly, "Rebar Revolution" is a fictional film centered around the trials and triumphs of a group of ironworkers, offering a more dramatic portrayal of the profession.
Now, back to our study, where the correlation between the proliferation of the name James and the prevalence of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana has piqued our curiosity. As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we are reminded of a fitting dad joke: "Why did the ironworker refuse to take a break? Because he couldn't stop rebar-ing about his work!" Indeed, the merriment of monikers and manual labor seems to echo through our exploration.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data gathered from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name James and the number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana. Over the time period of 2003 to 2022, our research uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8082196, with an r-squared value of 0.6532188 and a p-value less than 0.01. This statistically significant connection validates the long-suspected relationship between nomenclature and labor trends, affirming the profound impact of names on occupational dynamics. It seems that James is not only a popular name but also a harbinger of industrial endeavors in the jazzy state of Louisiana.
Amidst the sea of data, our findings evoke the whimsical image of a dance between the namesake James and the clang of hammers, a delightful jest that perhaps only an ironworker-dad could appreciate. The uncanny correlation between the proliferation of James and the proliferation of iron and rebar workers in Louisiana certainly gives new meaning to the term "ironclad evidence." It appears that the moniker James has cemented its place not only in popular culture but also in the structural landscape of the Pelican State.
Figure 1 (see below) illustrates the strong correlation between the popularity of the name James and the number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana. The scatterplot unmistakably portrays the upward trajectory of both variables, leaving little room for doubt regarding the intertwined fate of Jameses and jacks of all trades in the Bayou State. One might jest that where there's a James, there's a way for ironworking thrives.
In conclusion, our research not only illuminates the quirky correlation between the moniker "James" and the industrious spirit of iron and rebar workers in Louisiana, but also adds a touch of mirth to the realm of statistical inquiry. As we bid adieu to this riveting exploration, we leave you with a fitting dad joke: "Why did the ironworker refuse to take a nap? Because he didn't want to re-bar himself from the world!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has aptly unveiled the lighthearted yet robust relationship between the proliferation of the name James and the flourishing presence of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in the vibrant state of Louisiana. The conspicuous correlation coefficient of 0.8082196 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2022 definitively affirms the long-hypothesized connection between nomenclature and labor dynamics. It appears that the captivating allure of the name James resonates not only with parents but also with the fond clang of hammers in the Bayou State, confirming its role as an apparent harbinger of industrial endeavors. One might jest that the Jameses in Louisiana are setting quite the name-sake for themselves in the ironworking realm.

Our findings align with previous research that has examined the psychological impact of names on career choices. The work of Smith (2010), exploring the link between first names and career preferences, set the stage for our investigation by highlighting the subconscious influence of nomenclature. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the impact of names on professional identity, weaving a narrative that intriguingly parallels our own pursuit. These studies, when taken seriously, underscore the comprehensive influence names exert on occupational paths, giving credence to our results that reveal the undeniable correlation between the popularity of the name James and the prevalence of iron and rebar workers in Louisiana.

Our study also takes a whimsical yet earnest glance at the cultural and literary milieu surrounding ironworking, drawing inspiration from "The Iron Age: History of Reinforced Steel" and "The Rebar Chronicles" to contextualize our findings. And who could forget the subtle influence of cinematic productions such as "Iron Man" and "Rebar Revolution," which, albeit in a fictional setting, offer an offbeat yet relevant exploration of ironworking life. Such amalgamation of the serious and the playful mirrors our own approach to unveiling the curious connection between the name James and the iron and rebar workers in Louisiana.

Our research illuminates not only the quirky correlation between the moniker "James" and the industrious spirit of iron and rebar workers in Louisiana, but also captures the essence of statistical inquiry with a touch of mirth. The dance between the namesake James and the clang of hammers in Louisiana unveils a connection that would make any dad proud. As we bid adieu to this whimsical yet substantiated pursuit, we leave you with a befitting dad joke: "Why do ironworkers make terrible DJs? Because they can't stop hitting rebar!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name James and The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Jovial James: Juggling Jackhammers in Jambalaya State - A Merriment of Monikers and Manual Labor

[[ABSTRACT]]
The perennial pondering of the potential preponderance of the popularity of the first name James and the presence of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana has plagued scholars for ages. This study aims to elucidate this perplexing correlation, bringing together data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our findings establish a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8082196 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2022. With statistically significant results, we can confidently assert that there is a definite link between the proliferation of the name James and the influx of ironworkers in the Pelican State.

As we delved into the data, we couldn't help but marvel at the coincidence of the Jameses and the jacks of all trades in Louisiana. Indeed, one might jest that the name James not only symbolizes valiant victory in the face of adversity but also resonates with the clang of hammers on hardened steel. Our study provides compelling evidence that the more Jameses there are, the more fervently the iron and rebar workers in Louisiana seem to flourish.

In conclusion, our research sheds light on a curious connection that has long evaded scrutiny. While we tread lightly in attributing the popularity of a name to labor market trends, the data speaks for itself—Jameses and jacks of all trades in Louisiana are inextricably entwined. As we bid adieu, we leave you with a dad joke fitting for this whimsical exploration: "Why did the ironworker go to therapy? Because he had too many rebar-ative thoughts!"

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between socioeconomic factors and nomenclature has long been a subject of scholarly curiosity. This study delves into the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name James and the prevalence of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana. The whimsical and wondrous journey we embarked upon led us to uncover an unexpected connection, which we are excited to unravel within the following pages.
As we set out to tackle this enigmatic association, we couldn't help but be reminded of an ironworking dad joke: "Why did the ironworker bring a ladder to work? Because he heard the steels were high!" A hearty chuckle aside, the levity of such jests belies the serious inquiry at hand.
The state of Louisiana, known for its vibrant culture and eclectic mix of influences, provides a captivating backdrop for our investigation. The question at the heart of our study is whether the proliferation of the moniker "James" correlates with an upsurge in the number of ironworkers shaping the structural landscape of the Pelican State. This veritable jambalaya of a question piqued our interest and spurred our meticulous analysis of data spanning nearly two decades.
One cannot help but appreciate the delightful alliteration and consonance of "James" and "jacks of all trades," akin to the groove and rhythm of a well-coordinated construction site. The intriguing paradox of a name steeped in tradition and a profession that forges the future is akin to a dance between the timeless and the modern—akin to a tango of titanic talents.
Amidst the sea of data and statistical analyses, we couldn't resist a dad joke beckoning from the depths: "What did the enthusiastic ironworker say? 'I'm just so rebar-sive!'" Truly, the merriment of monikers and manual labor seems to manifest itself even in the nooks and crannies of academic exploration.
Stay tuned for the unfolding of our findings, as we unravel this captivating correlation and bid adieu with a parting pun: "Why did the James become an ironworker? Because he wanted to be a real 'steel' in his field!"

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data gathered from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name James and the number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana. Over the time period of 2003 to 2022, our research uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8082196, with an r-squared value of 0.6532188 and a p-value less than 0.01. This statistically significant connection validates the long-suspected relationship between nomenclature and labor trends, affirming the profound impact of names on occupational dynamics. It seems that James is not only a popular name but also a harbinger of industrial endeavors in the jazzy state of Louisiana.
Amidst the sea of data, our findings evoke the whimsical image of a dance between the namesake James and the clang of hammers, a delightful jest that perhaps only an ironworker-dad could appreciate. The uncanny correlation between the proliferation of James and the proliferation of iron and rebar workers in Louisiana certainly gives new meaning to the term "ironclad evidence." It appears that the moniker James has cemented its place not only in popular culture but also in the structural landscape of the Pelican State.
Figure 1 (see below) illustrates the strong correlation between the popularity of the name James and the number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana. The scatterplot unmistakably portrays the upward trajectory of both variables, leaving little room for doubt regarding the intertwined fate of Jameses and jacks of all trades in the Bayou State. One might jest that where there's a James, there's a way for ironworking thrives.
In conclusion, our research not only illuminates the quirky correlation between the moniker "James" and the industrious spirit of iron and rebar workers in Louisiana, but also adds a touch of mirth to the realm of statistical inquiry. As we bid adieu to this riveting exploration, we leave you with a fitting dad joke: "Why did the ironworker refuse to take a nap? Because he didn't want to re-bar himself from the world!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unveiled the undeniable link between the popularity of the first name James and the proliferation of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in the vibrant state of Louisiana. Our findings provide ironclad evidence of a correlation that, dare we say, "rebarly" seemed plausible. The data has painted a vivid picture of the harmonious dance between the Jameses and the jacks of all trades, shedding light on a connection that is as clear as the clang of a well-struck hammer.

Our research not only brings statistical rigor to the whimsical world of name-popularity correlations but also adds a touch of mirth to the sometimes austere realm of academic inquiry. As we bid adieu to this riveting exploration, we leave you with a dad joke perfectly tailored for this occasion: "Why did James become an ironworker? Because he wanted to be a real 'steel' in his field!" Can we get a round of applause for that one?

In light of our comprehensive findings, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. The correlation between the name James and the abundance of iron and rebar workers in Louisiana stands as robust as the steel beams they work with. It seems that when it comes to names and occupations, there's truly no "rebarrier" that can confound the whimsical dance of statistical destiny.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Jovial James: Juggling Jackhammers in Jambalaya State - A Merriment of Monikers and Manual Labor. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Whimsical Workforce Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Jovial James: Juggling Jackhammers in Jambalaya State - A Merriment of Monikers and Manual Labor. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for Silly Studies and Sundry Shenanigans


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Jovial James: Juggling Jackhammers in Jambalaya State - A Merriment of Monikers and Manual Labor with an abstract of The perennial pondering of the potential preponderance of the popularity of the first name James and the presence of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana has plagued scholars for ages. This study aims to elucidate this perplexing correlation, bringing together data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our findings establish a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8082196 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2022. With statistically significant results, we can confidently assert that there is a definite link between the proliferation of the name James and the influx of ironworkers in the Pelican State.
As we delved into the data, we couldn't help but marvel at the coincidence of the Jameses and the jacks of all trades in Louisiana. Indeed, one might jest that the name James not only symbolizes valiant victory in the face of adversity but also resonates with the clang of hammers on hardened steel. Our study provides compelling evidence that the more Jameses there are, the more fervently the iron and rebar workers in Louisiana seem to flourish.
In conclusion, our research sheds light on a curious connection that has long evaded scrutiny. While we tread lightly in attributing the popularity of a name to labor market trends, the data speaks for itself—Jameses and jacks of all trades in Louisiana are inextricably entwined. As we bid adieu, we leave you with a dad joke fitting for this whimsical exploration: "Why did the ironworker go to therapy? Because he had too many rebar-ative thoughts!

ChatGPT:

James, popularity, first name, Louisiana, ironworkers, reinforcing iron workers, rebar workers, correlation, US Social Security Administration, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, p-value, 2003-2022, labor market trends, data analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name James
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named James
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name James

The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana

Correlation r = 0.8082196 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6532188 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 65.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name James) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.6E-5. 0.0000162306074909004700000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.81 in 0.0016% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 61,612 random variables You don't actually need 61 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.57, 0.92 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name James (Babies born)1692916563161661629816001152181426813925132971347713614144981489614972144231367413242124341249712112
The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana (Laborers)800570590650580830350460320360230690570790400420400320200110




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([16929,16563,16166,16298,16001,15218,14268,13925,13297,13477,13614,14498,14896,14972,14423,13674,13242,12434,12497,12112,])
array_2 = np.array([800,570,590,650,580,830,350,460,320,360,230,690,570,790,400,420,400,320,200,110,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name James"
array_2_name = "The number of reinforcing iron and rebar workers in Louisiana"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 3959 · Black Variable ID: 1993 · Red Variable ID: 8779
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0