about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,927 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Butter consumption and the second variable is The number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As butter consumption increased, so did the demand for buttery pastries in Alaska. This led to a boom in the bakery industry, creating a need for more merchandise displayers and window trimmers to showcase all the delicious baked goods. As they say, it's a buttery delicious cycle of job creation in the Last Frontier!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Title: Dairy Wonderland Description: Create an image of a bustling town in Alaska, with colorful storefronts adorned with vibrant dairy-themed decorations. In the center of the town, a group of individuals skillfully arrange window displays, adding a touch of whimsy to the scene. Meanwhile, locals happily enjoy butter-laden treats, contributing to the need for window trimmers and displayers to ensure a "butter-tiful" and engaging display for all to savor. Render the scene in a cute and whimsical art style, emphasizing the vibrant dairy-themed decorations and the energetic atmosphere of the town. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Butter consumption and The number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Magic realism Celtic art Cutsy art illustration Cutsy art illustration Charcoal
ChatGPT: Cutsy art illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Butter consumption and The number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska, in the following situation: As butter consumption soared in Alaska, more people got "spread" thin, leading to a need for extra displayers and trimmers to "butter up" the windows with dairy-themed decorations, creating a "butter-tiful" display for all to enjoy!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling town in Alaska, the streets were lined with colorful storefronts adorned with vibrant dairy-themed decorations. In the center of it all, a group of individuals were skillfully arranging window displays, adding a touch of whimsy to the scene. Meanwhile, locals were seen happily enjoying their butter-laden treats, contributing to the need for more adornments and, more importantly, window trimmers and displayers to ensure a "butter-tiful" and engaging display for all to savor.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cutsy art illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling town in Alaska, the streets were lined with colorful storefronts adorned with vibrant dairy-themed decorations. In the center of it all, a group of individuals were skillfully arranging window displays, adding a touch of whimsy to the scene. Meanwhile, locals were seen happily enjoying their butter-laden treats, contributing to the need for more adornments and, more importantly, window trimmers and displayers to ensure a "butter-tiful" and engaging display for all to savor. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Title: Dairy Wonderland Description: Create an image of a bustling town in Alaska, with colorful storefronts adorned with vibrant dairy-themed decorations. In the center of the town, a group of individuals skillfully arrange window displays, adding a touch of whimsy to the scene. Meanwhile, locals happily enjoy butter-laden treats, contributing to the need for window trimmers and displayers to ensure a "butter-tiful" and engaging display for all to savor. Render the scene in a cute and whimsical art style, emphasizing the vibrant dairy-themed decorations and the energetic atmosphere of the town.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Butter consumption caused The number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Butter Consumption and Labor Production: A Gouda or Brie Connection?

The Dairy Digest

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and The number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8081455 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Butter Consumption and Labor Production: A Gouda or Brie Connection?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unusual yet intriguing relationship between butter consumption and the number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska. Leveraging data from the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period 2003 to 2021, our research team uncovers a correlation coefficient of 0.8081455 and a significance level of p < 0.01, showcasing a robust link between these seemingly unrelated variables. We buttered up the statistical analysis to spread light on this cheesy correlation, with intriguing implications for labor efficiency and buttery delights in the Last Frontier. Join us in unraveling this buttery mystery and discover how a pat of butter could be the key to a well-trimmed display!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and The number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Butter Consumption and Labor Production: A Gouda or Brie Connection?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unusual yet intriguing relationship between butter consumption and the number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska. Leveraging data from the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period 2003 to 2021, our research team uncovers a correlation coefficient of 0.8081455 and a significance level of p < 0.01, showcasing a robust link between these seemingly unrelated variables. We buttered up the statistical analysis to spread light on this cheesy correlation, with intriguing implications for labor efficiency and buttery delights in the Last Frontier. Join us in unraveling this buttery mystery and discover how a pat of butter could be the key to a well-trimmed display!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As researchers, we often find ourselves knee-deep in data, searching for connections that are more puzzling than a Rubik's cube in a tornado. But every once in a while, we stumble upon a correlation so unexpected, so un-brie-lievable, that it leaves us questioning the very foundations of our statistical universe. In this paper, we delve into the curd-ious world of butter consumption and its seemingly absurd tie to the number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in the Great White North, also known as Alaska.

Upon first glance, one might wonder if we've churned science into a cheesy comedy act, but fear not! Our findings are as gouda as they come. Leveraging data from reputable sources such as the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have embarked on a journey that would make even the most seasoned dairy farmer raise an eyebrow. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8081455 and a significance level of p < 0.01, our research team uncovered a robust link between buttery indulgence and the army of displayers and trimmers shaping the retail landscape of Alaska.

Now, you might be thinking, "What in the name of statistical significance does butter have to do with labor production?" And to that, we say, "Let's butter up the details and spread some light on this gloriously cheesy correlation."

Join us in unraveling this buttery mystery as we dissect the oh-so-gouda link between butter consumption and labor efficiency in the Last Frontier. You never know – by the end of this paper, you might just reconsider that pat of butter as more than just a savory delight. It could be the key to a well-trimmed display, quite literally putting the "butter" in "better" productivity! So, grab a seat and a slice of toast, and let's dive into this wondrous adventure of dairy and labor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and The number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Butter Consumption and Labor Production: A Gouda or Brie Connection?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unusual yet intriguing relationship between butter consumption and the number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska. Leveraging data from the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period 2003 to 2021, our research team uncovers a correlation coefficient of 0.8081455 and a significance level of p < 0.01, showcasing a robust link between these seemingly unrelated variables. We buttered up the statistical analysis to spread light on this cheesy correlation, with intriguing implications for labor efficiency and buttery delights in the Last Frontier. Join us in unraveling this buttery mystery and discover how a pat of butter could be the key to a well-trimmed display!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As researchers, we often find ourselves knee-deep in data, searching for connections that are more puzzling than a Rubik's cube in a tornado. But every once in a while, we stumble upon a correlation so unexpected, so un-brie-lievable, that it leaves us questioning the very foundations of our statistical universe. In this paper, we delve into the curd-ious world of butter consumption and its seemingly absurd tie to the number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in the Great White North, also known as Alaska.
Upon first glance, one might wonder if we've churned science into a cheesy comedy act, but fear not! Our findings are as gouda as they come. Leveraging data from reputable sources such as the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have embarked on a journey that would make even the most seasoned dairy farmer raise an eyebrow. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8081455 and a significance level of p < 0.01, our research team uncovered a robust link between buttery indulgence and the army of displayers and trimmers shaping the retail landscape of Alaska.
Now, you might be thinking, "What in the name of statistical significance does butter have to do with labor production?" And to that, we say, "Let's butter up the details and spread some light on this gloriously cheesy correlation."
Join us in unraveling this buttery mystery as we dissect the oh-so-gouda link between butter consumption and labor efficiency in the Last Frontier. You never know – by the end of this paper, you might just reconsider that pat of butter as more than just a savory delight. It could be the key to a well-trimmed display, quite literally putting the "butter" in "better" productivity! So, grab a seat and a slice of toast, and let's dive into this wondrous adventure of dairy and labor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Dairy Consumption and Economic Implications," Smith et al. explore the economic impact of dairy products on labor productivity, finding a positive relationship between cheese consumption and workforce efficiency. While their study does not directly focus on butter consumption or window trimmers, it provides valuable insights into the broader influence of dairy on labor dynamics. Building upon this foundation, our research aims to unravel the specific connection between butter consumption and the number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in the unique context of Alaska.

Turning to a more practical lens, Doe and Jones examine "Retail Display Strategies in Northern Climates," shedding light on the challenges and innovations in merchandise display practices in cold environments. Although their work does not address butter consumption, it offers valuable context for understanding the distinct retail landscape in Alaska and the potential influence of local dietary habits on labor demand.

Expanding beyond conventional academic literature, "The Joy of Cooking" by Irma S. Rombauer and Marion Rombauer Becker presents a comprehensive guide to culinary delights, including various recipes featuring butter as a central ingredient. While this classic cookbook may not offer statistical analysis, its cultural significance underscores the pervasive role of butter in culinary traditions, which may permeate into the labor market through unexplored channels.

As our investigation delves into the unexpected correlation between butter consumption and labor production, we draw inspiration from the fictional world of "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" by Roald Dahl. While the focus of the narrative revolves around chocolate, the whimsical tale reminds us of the intricate interplay between food, imagination, and labor, providing a whimsical backdrop to our exploration of unlikely connections.

Additionally, in our quest for unconventional sources, "SpongeBob SquarePants" serves as an unexpected but insightful reference, offering glimpses into the dynamics of underwater labor and the potential influence of marine-themed delicacies on productivity. While the cartoon may seem lighthearted, its portrayal of work environments and peculiar food preferences prompts contemplation of the broader factors shaping labor dynamics, including butter-induced phenomena.

In essence, our literature review ventures beyond traditional scholarly work, embracing diverse sources to enrich our understanding of the enigmatic relationship between butter consumption and the workforce responsible for shaping retail displays in Alaska. As we navigate through the landscape of cheese-laden literature and whimsical tales, we prepare to unveil the deep-fried truths underlying this peculiar yet captivating correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and The number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Butter Consumption and Labor Production: A Gouda or Brie Connection?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unusual yet intriguing relationship between butter consumption and the number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska. Leveraging data from the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period 2003 to 2021, our research team uncovers a correlation coefficient of 0.8081455 and a significance level of p < 0.01, showcasing a robust link between these seemingly unrelated variables. We buttered up the statistical analysis to spread light on this cheesy correlation, with intriguing implications for labor efficiency and buttery delights in the Last Frontier. Join us in unraveling this buttery mystery and discover how a pat of butter could be the key to a well-trimmed display!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As researchers, we often find ourselves knee-deep in data, searching for connections that are more puzzling than a Rubik's cube in a tornado. But every once in a while, we stumble upon a correlation so unexpected, so un-brie-lievable, that it leaves us questioning the very foundations of our statistical universe. In this paper, we delve into the curd-ious world of butter consumption and its seemingly absurd tie to the number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in the Great White North, also known as Alaska.
Upon first glance, one might wonder if we've churned science into a cheesy comedy act, but fear not! Our findings are as gouda as they come. Leveraging data from reputable sources such as the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have embarked on a journey that would make even the most seasoned dairy farmer raise an eyebrow. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8081455 and a significance level of p < 0.01, our research team uncovered a robust link between buttery indulgence and the army of displayers and trimmers shaping the retail landscape of Alaska.
Now, you might be thinking, "What in the name of statistical significance does butter have to do with labor production?" And to that, we say, "Let's butter up the details and spread some light on this gloriously cheesy correlation."
Join us in unraveling this buttery mystery as we dissect the oh-so-gouda link between butter consumption and labor efficiency in the Last Frontier. You never know – by the end of this paper, you might just reconsider that pat of butter as more than just a savory delight. It could be the key to a well-trimmed display, quite literally putting the "butter" in "better" productivity! So, grab a seat and a slice of toast, and let's dive into this wondrous adventure of dairy and labor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unfold the enigmatic connection between butter consumption and the number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska, our research team undertook a methodological approach as captivating as a magician pulling a rabbit out of a top hat. Our journey commenced with data collection from reputable sources, predominantly the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, serving as the treasure troves of information from 2003 to 2021. We scoured through a myriad of datasets, skimming through spreadsheets and numbers that would make even a mathematician's head spin, all in pursuit of unraveling this dairy-laden mystery.

We engaged in what could only be described as a dance with statistics, employing a concoction of correlation analysis, time-series modeling, and some good old-fashioned cheese-tasting (strictly for creative inspiration, of course). Our approach was as thorough as examining the holes in a slice of Swiss cheese, leaving no stone unturned in our quest to extract every ounce of insight from the data at hand.

In order to establish the strength of the relationship between butter consumption and the labor force dedicated to merchandise display and window trimming, we utilized robust statistical techniques, ranging from Pearson's, Spearman's to even a sprinkle of Muenster's correlation coefficients. Our statistical tools were as sharp as a cheddar knife, cutting through the data to uncover the depth of the buttery influence on labor productivity in the Last Frontier.

Moreover, our research team also ventured into the world of regression analysis, crafting models as finely tuned as a master cheesemaker perfecting the ripening process. We included covariates such as economic trends, population shifts, and consumer behavior, creating a blend that encapsulated the unique flavor profile of the relationship between butter consumption and labor production in Alaska.

In addition to the numerical acrobatics, we dabbled in qualitative interviews with industry experts, attempting to gather firsthand insights that would complement our quantitative findings. These interviews were as rich in flavor as a decadent buttery croissant, allowing us to add a layer of depth to our understanding of the intricate interplay between buttery indulgence and labor dynamics.

Working our way through this unique blend of methodologies, we are confident that our approach has churned out insights that are as delectable as a freshly baked batch of scones. With our efforts combined, we aimed to showcase the robustness of the correlation at hand, presenting a narrative as compelling as a dairy-themed bedtime story.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and The number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8081455, r-squared of 0.6530991, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Butter Consumption and Labor Production: A Gouda or Brie Connection?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unusual yet intriguing relationship between butter consumption and the number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska. Leveraging data from the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period 2003 to 2021, our research team uncovers a correlation coefficient of 0.8081455 and a significance level of p < 0.01, showcasing a robust link between these seemingly unrelated variables. We buttered up the statistical analysis to spread light on this cheesy correlation, with intriguing implications for labor efficiency and buttery delights in the Last Frontier. Join us in unraveling this buttery mystery and discover how a pat of butter could be the key to a well-trimmed display!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As researchers, we often find ourselves knee-deep in data, searching for connections that are more puzzling than a Rubik's cube in a tornado. But every once in a while, we stumble upon a correlation so unexpected, so un-brie-lievable, that it leaves us questioning the very foundations of our statistical universe. In this paper, we delve into the curd-ious world of butter consumption and its seemingly absurd tie to the number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in the Great White North, also known as Alaska.
Upon first glance, one might wonder if we've churned science into a cheesy comedy act, but fear not! Our findings are as gouda as they come. Leveraging data from reputable sources such as the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have embarked on a journey that would make even the most seasoned dairy farmer raise an eyebrow. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8081455 and a significance level of p < 0.01, our research team uncovered a robust link between buttery indulgence and the army of displayers and trimmers shaping the retail landscape of Alaska.
Now, you might be thinking, "What in the name of statistical significance does butter have to do with labor production?" And to that, we say, "Let's butter up the details and spread some light on this gloriously cheesy correlation."
Join us in unraveling this buttery mystery as we dissect the oh-so-gouda link between butter consumption and labor efficiency in the Last Frontier. You never know – by the end of this paper, you might just reconsider that pat of butter as more than just a savory delight. It could be the key to a well-trimmed display, quite literally putting the "butter" in "better" productivity! So, grab a seat and a slice of toast, and let's dive into this wondrous adventure of dairy and labor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In unraveling the un-brie-lievable saga of butter consumption and labor production, our research team stumbled upon a correlation coefficient of 0.8081455, reflecting a surprisingly strong association between these seemingly disparate variables. With an r-squared value of 0.6530991 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings have churned up quite a stir in the scientific community – and not just in the dairy aisle!

The strong correlation between butter consumption and the number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska was beautifully exemplified in our scatterplot (see Fig. 1). The scatterplot showcased a delightfully buttery pattern of data points, emphasizing the tight-knit relationship between these variables. We must say, the sight of that scatterplot was enough to make even the most lactose-intolerant of statisticians appreciate the beauty of this unexpected correlation.

The implications of our findings spread as smoothly as a freshly churned batch of butter. The robust link we uncovered between buttery indulgence and labor efficiency in Alaska holds promise for further exploration into the uncharted territory of dairy-based influences on workforce productivity. Who would have thought that a pat of butter could hold the key to a well-trimmed display? Clearly, in the realm of statistical curiosities, the unexpected can be as deliciously enlightening as a gourmet cheese platter at a statistics symposium.

In conclusion, our findings not only shed light on the peculiar connection between butter consumption and labor production but also sprinkle a pinch of wonder onto the often-gritty landscape of statistical analysis. We invite fellow researchers to join us in savoring this oh-so-gouda correlation and pondering the implications of dairy delights on labor efficiency. As we wrap up this section, we invite you to ponder: Could butter be the unsung hero behind the well-dressed displays and finely trimmed windows, quietly shaping the retail world in Alaska? Only time, and perhaps a few more pats of butter, will tell!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and The number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Butter Consumption and Labor Production: A Gouda or Brie Connection?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unusual yet intriguing relationship between butter consumption and the number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska. Leveraging data from the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period 2003 to 2021, our research team uncovers a correlation coefficient of 0.8081455 and a significance level of p < 0.01, showcasing a robust link between these seemingly unrelated variables. We buttered up the statistical analysis to spread light on this cheesy correlation, with intriguing implications for labor efficiency and buttery delights in the Last Frontier. Join us in unraveling this buttery mystery and discover how a pat of butter could be the key to a well-trimmed display!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Dairy Consumption and Economic Implications," Smith et al. explore the economic impact of dairy products on labor productivity, finding a positive relationship between cheese consumption and workforce efficiency. While their study does not directly focus on butter consumption or window trimmers, it provides valuable insights into the broader influence of dairy on labor dynamics. Building upon this foundation, our research aims to unravel the specific connection between butter consumption and the number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in the unique context of Alaska.
Turning to a more practical lens, Doe and Jones examine "Retail Display Strategies in Northern Climates," shedding light on the challenges and innovations in merchandise display practices in cold environments. Although their work does not address butter consumption, it offers valuable context for understanding the distinct retail landscape in Alaska and the potential influence of local dietary habits on labor demand.
Expanding beyond conventional academic literature, "The Joy of Cooking" by Irma S. Rombauer and Marion Rombauer Becker presents a comprehensive guide to culinary delights, including various recipes featuring butter as a central ingredient. While this classic cookbook may not offer statistical analysis, its cultural significance underscores the pervasive role of butter in culinary traditions, which may permeate into the labor market through unexplored channels.
As our investigation delves into the unexpected correlation between butter consumption and labor production, we draw inspiration from the fictional world of "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" by Roald Dahl. While the focus of the narrative revolves around chocolate, the whimsical tale reminds us of the intricate interplay between food, imagination, and labor, providing a whimsical backdrop to our exploration of unlikely connections.
Additionally, in our quest for unconventional sources, "SpongeBob SquarePants" serves as an unexpected but insightful reference, offering glimpses into the dynamics of underwater labor and the potential influence of marine-themed delicacies on productivity. While the cartoon may seem lighthearted, its portrayal of work environments and peculiar food preferences prompts contemplation of the broader factors shaping labor dynamics, including butter-induced phenomena.
In essence, our literature review ventures beyond traditional scholarly work, embracing diverse sources to enrich our understanding of the enigmatic relationship between butter consumption and the workforce responsible for shaping retail displays in Alaska. As we navigate through the landscape of cheese-laden literature and whimsical tales, we prepare to unveil the deep-fried truths underlying this peculiar yet captivating correlation.

[[RESULTS]]
In unraveling the un-brie-lievable saga of butter consumption and labor production, our research team stumbled upon a correlation coefficient of 0.8081455, reflecting a surprisingly strong association between these seemingly disparate variables. With an r-squared value of 0.6530991 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings have churned up quite a stir in the scientific community – and not just in the dairy aisle!
The strong correlation between butter consumption and the number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska was beautifully exemplified in our scatterplot (see Fig. 1). The scatterplot showcased a delightfully buttery pattern of data points, emphasizing the tight-knit relationship between these variables. We must say, the sight of that scatterplot was enough to make even the most lactose-intolerant of statisticians appreciate the beauty of this unexpected correlation.
The implications of our findings spread as smoothly as a freshly churned batch of butter. The robust link we uncovered between buttery indulgence and labor efficiency in Alaska holds promise for further exploration into the uncharted territory of dairy-based influences on workforce productivity. Who would have thought that a pat of butter could hold the key to a well-trimmed display? Clearly, in the realm of statistical curiosities, the unexpected can be as deliciously enlightening as a gourmet cheese platter at a statistics symposium.
In conclusion, our findings not only shed light on the peculiar connection between butter consumption and labor production but also sprinkle a pinch of wonder onto the often-gritty landscape of statistical analysis. We invite fellow researchers to join us in savoring this oh-so-gouda correlation and pondering the implications of dairy delights on labor efficiency. As we wrap up this section, we invite you to ponder: Could butter be the unsung hero behind the well-dressed displays and finely trimmed windows, quietly shaping the retail world in Alaska? Only time, and perhaps a few more pats of butter, will tell!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study provide compelling evidence for the unexpected yet tantalizing link between butter consumption and the number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska. Our findings not only corroborate previous research on the broader influence of dairy products on labor dynamics but also cheddar light on the specific impact of buttery delights in shaping the labor market.

Drawing on the work of Smith et al., who found a positive relationship between cheese consumption and workforce efficiency, our study extends this dairy-driven narrative to the unique context of butter consumption. The robust correlation coefficient we uncovered aligns with the overarching theme of dairy products playing a role in labor production, adding a dollop of support to the notion that cheese, and now butter, may indeed hold the key to enhanced labor productivity. To put it in dairy terms, our results churn up evidence to melt away any skepticism regarding the influence of butter on labor demand.

Similarly, the exploration of merchandise display strategies in cold climates by Doe and Jones sets the stage for understanding the distinct retail landscape in Alaska. While their work did not directly address butter consumption, it offered crucial context for our investigation and served as a breadcrumb trail to uncover the potential influence of local dietary habits on labor demand. Our findings, with a significance level of p < 0.01, provide a creamy continuation of their narrative, highlighting the savory implications of butter consumption on the demand for labor in shaping retail displays.

Delving into the unconventional sources presented in our literature review, we took the whimsical world of "SpongeBob SquarePants" and the enchanted realm of "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" seriously in examining the interplay between food, imagination, and labor. Although these may seem like cheesy references, they served as thoughtful touchpoints to contemplate the broader factors shaping labor dynamics, including the potential influence of butter-induced phenomena. In a way, our results speak to the whimsical musings encapsulated in these narratives, affirming that even the most unexpected sources can churn out valuable insights.

In sum, our findings serve up a delectable blend of statistical rigor and culinary curiosity, adding a pinch of wonder to the often-unsalted landscape of labor economics. The association we uncovered between butter consumption and the workforce responsible for shaping retail displays in Alaska not only curdles up excitement in the research community but also provolones intriguing questions for further exploration. As we butter up for further research endeavors, we invite fellow enthusiasts to join us in savoring the cheesy yet captivating journey of uncovering the potential influence of dairy delights on labor efficiency. After all, in the realm of research, the unexpected can be as delightful as discovering a hidden slice of brie in a sandwich.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and The number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Butter Consumption and Labor Production: A Gouda or Brie Connection?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unusual yet intriguing relationship between butter consumption and the number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska. Leveraging data from the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period 2003 to 2021, our research team uncovers a correlation coefficient of 0.8081455 and a significance level of p < 0.01, showcasing a robust link between these seemingly unrelated variables. We buttered up the statistical analysis to spread light on this cheesy correlation, with intriguing implications for labor efficiency and buttery delights in the Last Frontier. Join us in unraveling this buttery mystery and discover how a pat of butter could be the key to a well-trimmed display!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As researchers, we often find ourselves knee-deep in data, searching for connections that are more puzzling than a Rubik's cube in a tornado. But every once in a while, we stumble upon a correlation so unexpected, so un-brie-lievable, that it leaves us questioning the very foundations of our statistical universe. In this paper, we delve into the curd-ious world of butter consumption and its seemingly absurd tie to the number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in the Great White North, also known as Alaska.
Upon first glance, one might wonder if we've churned science into a cheesy comedy act, but fear not! Our findings are as gouda as they come. Leveraging data from reputable sources such as the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have embarked on a journey that would make even the most seasoned dairy farmer raise an eyebrow. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8081455 and a significance level of p < 0.01, our research team uncovered a robust link between buttery indulgence and the army of displayers and trimmers shaping the retail landscape of Alaska.
Now, you might be thinking, "What in the name of statistical significance does butter have to do with labor production?" And to that, we say, "Let's butter up the details and spread some light on this gloriously cheesy correlation."
Join us in unraveling this buttery mystery as we dissect the oh-so-gouda link between butter consumption and labor efficiency in the Last Frontier. You never know – by the end of this paper, you might just reconsider that pat of butter as more than just a savory delight. It could be the key to a well-trimmed display, quite literally putting the "butter" in "better" productivity! So, grab a seat and a slice of toast, and let's dive into this wondrous adventure of dairy and labor.

[[RESULTS]]
In unraveling the un-brie-lievable saga of butter consumption and labor production, our research team stumbled upon a correlation coefficient of 0.8081455, reflecting a surprisingly strong association between these seemingly disparate variables. With an r-squared value of 0.6530991 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings have churned up quite a stir in the scientific community – and not just in the dairy aisle!
The strong correlation between butter consumption and the number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska was beautifully exemplified in our scatterplot (see Fig. 1). The scatterplot showcased a delightfully buttery pattern of data points, emphasizing the tight-knit relationship between these variables. We must say, the sight of that scatterplot was enough to make even the most lactose-intolerant of statisticians appreciate the beauty of this unexpected correlation.
The implications of our findings spread as smoothly as a freshly churned batch of butter. The robust link we uncovered between buttery indulgence and labor efficiency in Alaska holds promise for further exploration into the uncharted territory of dairy-based influences on workforce productivity. Who would have thought that a pat of butter could hold the key to a well-trimmed display? Clearly, in the realm of statistical curiosities, the unexpected can be as deliciously enlightening as a gourmet cheese platter at a statistics symposium.
In conclusion, our findings not only shed light on the peculiar connection between butter consumption and labor production but also sprinkle a pinch of wonder onto the often-gritty landscape of statistical analysis. We invite fellow researchers to join us in savoring this oh-so-gouda correlation and pondering the implications of dairy delights on labor efficiency. As we wrap up this section, we invite you to ponder: Could butter be the unsung hero behind the well-dressed displays and finely trimmed windows, quietly shaping the retail world in Alaska? Only time, and perhaps a few more pats of butter, will tell!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has uncovered a correlation between butter consumption and the number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska that is as gouda as it gets! It's safe to say that our findings have churned up quite a stir in the scientific community, leaving everyone feeling a little bit butter about the world.

The implications of our study are as rich as a creamy brie. Who would have thought that something as humble as a pat of butter could be linked to the productivity of labor in Alaska? It's enough to make one feel like they've stumbled into a dairy-themed episode of "The Twilight Zone."

As we spread this cheesy revelation, we invite fellow researchers to consider the dairy-based mysteries that may lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated variables. Will future studies continue to uncover more delicious connections like this, or have we finally put the lid on the butter container of unexpected correlations?

We believe that for now, it's time to "whey" down the possibilities and give this field a well-deserved rest. After all, when you've discovered a correlation this gouda, it's okay to brie-lax and let the buttery mysteries of science simmer for a while. Let's just hope that we don't get too "wheysted" celebrating our findings!

In the end, maybe there's no need for further research in this area. We may have finally answered the age-old question: "What's the dill with butter and labor productivity in Alaska?" But fear not – we'll always have fondue memories of this research endeavor!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Butter Consumption and Labor Production: A Gouda or Brie Connection?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Dairy Digest


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Butter Consumption and Labor Production: A Gouda or Brie Connection?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Dairy Studies Institute


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Butter Consumption and Labor Production: A Gouda or Brie Connection? with an abstract of This paper delves into the unusual yet intriguing relationship between butter consumption and the number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska. Leveraging data from the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period 2003 to 2021, our research team uncovers a correlation coefficient of 0.8081455 and a significance level of p < 0.01, showcasing a robust link between these seemingly unrelated variables. We buttered up the statistical analysis to spread light on this cheesy correlation, with intriguing implications for labor efficiency and buttery delights in the Last Frontier. Join us in unraveling this buttery mystery and discover how a pat of butter could be the key to a well-trimmed display!

ChatGPT:

butter consumption, labor production, merchandise displayers, window trimmers, Alaska, USDA data, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, significance level, statistical analysis, labor efficiency, Last Frontier, buttery delights, buttery mystery

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Butter consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of Butter in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Butter consumption

The number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska

Correlation r = 0.8081455 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6530991 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 65.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Butter consumption) over the 19 years from 2003 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.8E-5. 0.0000283874295519061950000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.81 in 0.0028% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 35,227 random variables You don't actually need 35 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.56, 0.92 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Butter consumption (Pounds per person)4.54.54.54.74.7554.95.45.55.55.55.65.75.766.26.36.5
The number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska (Laborers)90701205080120130140530460150180190270290370350500530




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.5,4.5,4.5,4.7,4.7,5,5,4.9,5.4,5.5,5.5,5.5,5.6,5.7,5.7,6,6.2,6.3,6.5,])
array_2 = np.array([90,70,120,50,80,120,130,140,530,460,150,180,190,270,290,370,350,500,530,])
array_1_name = "Butter consumption"
array_2_name = "The number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Alaska"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 3927 · Black Variable ID: 557 · Red Variable ID: 4735
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0