about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,765 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and the second variable is Solar power generated in Guinea.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Americans gulped down more bottled water, it created a surge in global hydration levels. This led to a ripple effect, sparking a renewed interest in renewable energy sources. The H2-overflow reached all the way to Guinea, where they were able to tap into this newfound solar power of positive thinking. It just go to show, when it rains, it pours – both blessings and bright ideas!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a sunny day in the US, with a diverse group of people happily sipping from bottled water. The setting should convey a sense of relaxation and contentment. Additionally, include a prominent, visually striking solar panel in Guinea under the bright sunshine, highlighting the concept of renewable energy generation. The image should capture the photorealistic essence of the scene, focusing on the vivid colors and natural lighting to encapsulate the warmth and positive energy of the moment. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Solar power generated in Guinea. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Photorealism Sci-fi fantacy a funny image you would see on reddit Vaporwave Photorealism
ChatGPT: Photorealism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Solar power generated in Guinea, in the following situation: Because as Americans chugged more bottled water, they were getting "charged up" with hydration, which fueled a surge in solar power ideas. The "light bulb" went off, and Guinea hopped on the solar bandwagon, ready to soak up the energy!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A group of people in the US are seen happily sipping from bottled water while standing under the bright sunshine. A large solar panel is shown in Guinea, with the sun shining brightly on it, generating abundant solar power.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Photorealism ] and depicting this scene: A group of people in the US are seen happily sipping from bottled water while standing under the bright sunshine. A large solar panel is shown in Guinea, with the sun shining brightly on it, generating abundant solar power. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a sunny day in the US, with a diverse group of people happily sipping from bottled water. The setting should convey a sense of relaxation and contentment. Additionally, include a prominent, visually striking solar panel in Guinea under the bright sunshine, highlighting the concept of renewable energy generation. The image should capture the photorealistic essence of the scene, focusing on the vivid colors and natural lighting to encapsulate the warmth and positive energy of the moment.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in US Bottled Water Consumption per Person caused Solar power generated in Guinea to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Sunny Side Up: Shedding Light on the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Solar Power in Guinea

The International Journal of Solar Beverage Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Solar power generated in Guinea. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Statista and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9188259 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Sunny Side Up: Shedding Light on the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Solar Power in Guinea"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the uncharted waters of investigating the curious connection between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Guinea. As we navigate through these unexpected pairings, we aim to shed light on the underlying factors at play, all while keeping our spirits bright with a dash of humor - because let's face it, research can sometimes leave us feeling parched, but a good dad joke can be a refreshing sip of relief.

Our research team diligently combed through data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration to not only quench our curiosity, but also to quench the thirst for knowledge in the scientific community. Analyzing the years 2009 to 2021, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9188259 and p < 0.01, suggesting a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Now, you may be thinking, "What in the world does bottled water consumption in the US have to do with solar power in Guinea?" Well, hold on to your solar panels, because here comes a sun-kissed dad joke: It appears that these two may be linked by a "solar thirst" phenomenon, where as the sun shines brighter, so does the demand for bottled hydration. The causality behind this correlation remains a puzzle, but it's certainly not a "bottle-neck" in our understanding - pun intended.

As we revel in the quirky connection between these contrasting elements, one thing is clear: the world of scientific inquiry never ceases to surprise us, much like a refreshing bottle of water on a scorching day. So, whether you're basking in the sun's rays or pondering the mysteries of bottled water and solar power, remember that even in the realm of academia, a little humor can "lighten" the load of knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Solar power generated in Guinea. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Sunny Side Up: Shedding Light on the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Solar Power in Guinea"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the uncharted waters of investigating the curious connection between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Guinea. As we navigate through these unexpected pairings, we aim to shed light on the underlying factors at play, all while keeping our spirits bright with a dash of humor - because let's face it, research can sometimes leave us feeling parched, but a good dad joke can be a refreshing sip of relief.

Our research team diligently combed through data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration to not only quench our curiosity, but also to quench the thirst for knowledge in the scientific community. Analyzing the years 2009 to 2021, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9188259 and p < 0.01, suggesting a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Now, you may be thinking, "What in the world does bottled water consumption in the US have to do with solar power in Guinea?" Well, hold on to your solar panels, because here comes a sun-kissed dad joke: It appears that these two may be linked by a "solar thirst" phenomenon, where as the sun shines brighter, so does the demand for bottled hydration. The causality behind this correlation remains a puzzle, but it's certainly not a "bottle-neck" in our understanding - pun intended.

As we revel in the quirky connection between these contrasting elements, one thing is clear: the world of scientific inquiry never ceases to surprise us, much like a refreshing bottle of water on a scorching day. So, whether you're basking in the sun's rays or pondering the mysteries of bottled water and solar power, remember that even in the realm of academia, a little humor can "lighten" the load of knowledge.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The interplay between seemingly unrelated variables has always piqued the curiosity of researchers. As we embark on our quest to uncover the connection between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Guinea, we find ourselves treading into unexplored territory, akin to solar-powered submarines. Speaking of submarines, did you hear about the deep-sea diver who fell in love? It was a case of "pressure" mounting.

Our exploration into this puzzling relationship is motivated by the desire to unearth the underlying mechanisms that tie these disparate elements together. Much like a solar eclipse, where the sun and moon briefly align, our study aims to shed light on the alignment of bottled water habits and solar power generation. After all, it seems that these two domains are not as far apart as the Pacific and the Atlantic.

The motivation to delve into these unlikely bedfellows comes from the recognition that the pursuit of knowledge, like a good refreshment, often leaves us wanting more. It is this thirst for understanding that propels us to inquire about the potential links between a nation's preference for bottled water and another nation's reliance on solar energy. One may even say we're embarking on a "solar-powered" quest for knowledge.

As we survey the landscape of data pertaining to bottled water consumption in the US and solar power generation in Guinea, we are acutely aware of the need to quench our curiosity while maintaining a well-hydrated sense of humor. Because, let's face it, the world of research can sometimes leave us feeling parched, but a good dad joke can be the oasis in the data desert. Speaking of oases, what did one oasis say to the other oasis? "Long time, no sea!"

The correlation coefficient of 0.9188259 and p < 0.01 that emerged from our analysis of the years between 2009 and 2021 was striking, to say the least. It suggests a remarkably strong relationship between the consumption of bottled water in the US and the generation of solar power in Guinea. The strength of this correlation, much like a camel's thirst in the desert, leaves us not only surprised but also thirsty for more insights into this unexpected link.

As we wade through the depths of this unusual correlation, one thing becomes abundantly clear: the world of research is not without its surprises. Just like the unexpected pleasure of finding a dollar in an old jacket, uncovering connections between seemingly distant concepts brings a sense of both delight and intrigue. The interplay between US bottled water consumption and solar power generation in Guinea may still be shrouded in mystery, but our thirst for knowledge drives us forward, much like a refreshing glass of water on a scorching day. So, as we journey further into this enigmatic realm, remember that even in the scholarly pursuit of knowledge, a bit of humor can be the "water" that irrigates the fields of discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Solar power generated in Guinea. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Sunny Side Up: Shedding Light on the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Solar Power in Guinea"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the uncharted waters of investigating the curious connection between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Guinea. As we navigate through these unexpected pairings, we aim to shed light on the underlying factors at play, all while keeping our spirits bright with a dash of humor - because let's face it, research can sometimes leave us feeling parched, but a good dad joke can be a refreshing sip of relief.

Our research team diligently combed through data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration to not only quench our curiosity, but also to quench the thirst for knowledge in the scientific community. Analyzing the years 2009 to 2021, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9188259 and p < 0.01, suggesting a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Now, you may be thinking, "What in the world does bottled water consumption in the US have to do with solar power in Guinea?" Well, hold on to your solar panels, because here comes a sun-kissed dad joke: It appears that these two may be linked by a "solar thirst" phenomenon, where as the sun shines brighter, so does the demand for bottled hydration. The causality behind this correlation remains a puzzle, but it's certainly not a "bottle-neck" in our understanding - pun intended.

As we revel in the quirky connection between these contrasting elements, one thing is clear: the world of scientific inquiry never ceases to surprise us, much like a refreshing bottle of water on a scorching day. So, whether you're basking in the sun's rays or pondering the mysteries of bottled water and solar power, remember that even in the realm of academia, a little humor can "lighten" the load of knowledge.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between seemingly unrelated variables has always piqued the curiosity of researchers. As we embark on our quest to uncover the connection between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Guinea, we find ourselves treading into unexplored territory, akin to solar-powered submarines. Speaking of submarines, did you hear about the deep-sea diver who fell in love? It was a case of "pressure" mounting.
Our exploration into this puzzling relationship is motivated by the desire to unearth the underlying mechanisms that tie these disparate elements together. Much like a solar eclipse, where the sun and moon briefly align, our study aims to shed light on the alignment of bottled water habits and solar power generation. After all, it seems that these two domains are not as far apart as the Pacific and the Atlantic.
The motivation to delve into these unlikely bedfellows comes from the recognition that the pursuit of knowledge, like a good refreshment, often leaves us wanting more. It is this thirst for understanding that propels us to inquire about the potential links between a nation's preference for bottled water and another nation's reliance on solar energy. One may even say we're embarking on a "solar-powered" quest for knowledge.
As we survey the landscape of data pertaining to bottled water consumption in the US and solar power generation in Guinea, we are acutely aware of the need to quench our curiosity while maintaining a well-hydrated sense of humor. Because, let's face it, the world of research can sometimes leave us feeling parched, but a good dad joke can be the oasis in the data desert. Speaking of oases, what did one oasis say to the other oasis? "Long time, no sea!"
The correlation coefficient of 0.9188259 and p < 0.01 that emerged from our analysis of the years between 2009 and 2021 was striking, to say the least. It suggests a remarkably strong relationship between the consumption of bottled water in the US and the generation of solar power in Guinea. The strength of this correlation, much like a camel's thirst in the desert, leaves us not only surprised but also thirsty for more insights into this unexpected link.

As we wade through the depths of this unusual correlation, one thing becomes abundantly clear: the world of research is not without its surprises. Just like the unexpected pleasure of finding a dollar in an old jacket, uncovering connections between seemingly distant concepts brings a sense of both delight and intrigue. The interplay between US bottled water consumption and solar power generation in Guinea may still be shrouded in mystery, but our thirst for knowledge drives us forward, much like a refreshing glass of water on a scorching day. So, as we journey further into this enigmatic realm, remember that even in the scholarly pursuit of knowledge, a bit of humor can be the "water" that irrigates the fields of discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

As we navigate through the unexpected correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Guinea, we are reminded of the profound curiosity about the interplay between seemingly disparate variables. In "Water and Energy: Threats and Opportunities" by Smith, the authors examine the complex relationship between human consumption of water and energy generation, prompting us to reconsider the boundary-breaking possibilities that underlie our research. The study illuminates the intricate web of connections within the realm of resource consumption, much like a solar-powered light bulb illuminates a room in the evening.

Speaking of illumination, in "Solar Power: Technologies, Environmental Impact, and Future Prospects" by Doe, the exploration of solar power generation takes center stage, highlighting the potential for renewable energy sources. This prompts us to consider the broader implications of our investigation, much like how a solar panel converts sunlight into electricity. After all, it's important to stay sunny side up when delving into such intriguing topics - pun intended.

In addition to academic literature, real-life examples of unexpected connections between seemingly unrelated elements can be found in books like "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, and "The Tipping Point" by Malcolm Gladwell. These works delve into the surprising dynamics that drive various phenomena, showing us that unconventional relationships are not as rare as finding water in the desert - pun intended.

Speaking of unconventional relationships, who would have thought that a Facebook post about a guinea pig enjoying a sunny day and a tweet about the benefits of drinking water could provide tangentially relevant insights? These social media snippets serve as whimsical reminders that the world is rife with unexpected connections, much like stumbling upon a well-timed dad joke when least expected.

In "Solar Power for Dummies" by Rik DeGunther, the authors elucidate the intricacies of solar energy in a light-hearted manner, serving as a beacon of humor in the often complex world of renewable energy. It's a gentle nudge to remind us that even in the realm of academia, a good dad joke can be the oasis in the midst of rigorous research - much like a solar-powered water pump in the desert.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Solar power generated in Guinea. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2009 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Sunny Side Up: Shedding Light on the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Solar Power in Guinea"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the uncharted waters of investigating the curious connection between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Guinea. As we navigate through these unexpected pairings, we aim to shed light on the underlying factors at play, all while keeping our spirits bright with a dash of humor - because let's face it, research can sometimes leave us feeling parched, but a good dad joke can be a refreshing sip of relief.

Our research team diligently combed through data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration to not only quench our curiosity, but also to quench the thirst for knowledge in the scientific community. Analyzing the years 2009 to 2021, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9188259 and p < 0.01, suggesting a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Now, you may be thinking, "What in the world does bottled water consumption in the US have to do with solar power in Guinea?" Well, hold on to your solar panels, because here comes a sun-kissed dad joke: It appears that these two may be linked by a "solar thirst" phenomenon, where as the sun shines brighter, so does the demand for bottled hydration. The causality behind this correlation remains a puzzle, but it's certainly not a "bottle-neck" in our understanding - pun intended.

As we revel in the quirky connection between these contrasting elements, one thing is clear: the world of scientific inquiry never ceases to surprise us, much like a refreshing bottle of water on a scorching day. So, whether you're basking in the sun's rays or pondering the mysteries of bottled water and solar power, remember that even in the realm of academia, a little humor can "lighten" the load of knowledge.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between seemingly unrelated variables has always piqued the curiosity of researchers. As we embark on our quest to uncover the connection between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Guinea, we find ourselves treading into unexplored territory, akin to solar-powered submarines. Speaking of submarines, did you hear about the deep-sea diver who fell in love? It was a case of "pressure" mounting.
Our exploration into this puzzling relationship is motivated by the desire to unearth the underlying mechanisms that tie these disparate elements together. Much like a solar eclipse, where the sun and moon briefly align, our study aims to shed light on the alignment of bottled water habits and solar power generation. After all, it seems that these two domains are not as far apart as the Pacific and the Atlantic.
The motivation to delve into these unlikely bedfellows comes from the recognition that the pursuit of knowledge, like a good refreshment, often leaves us wanting more. It is this thirst for understanding that propels us to inquire about the potential links between a nation's preference for bottled water and another nation's reliance on solar energy. One may even say we're embarking on a "solar-powered" quest for knowledge.
As we survey the landscape of data pertaining to bottled water consumption in the US and solar power generation in Guinea, we are acutely aware of the need to quench our curiosity while maintaining a well-hydrated sense of humor. Because, let's face it, the world of research can sometimes leave us feeling parched, but a good dad joke can be the oasis in the data desert. Speaking of oases, what did one oasis say to the other oasis? "Long time, no sea!"
The correlation coefficient of 0.9188259 and p < 0.01 that emerged from our analysis of the years between 2009 and 2021 was striking, to say the least. It suggests a remarkably strong relationship between the consumption of bottled water in the US and the generation of solar power in Guinea. The strength of this correlation, much like a camel's thirst in the desert, leaves us not only surprised but also thirsty for more insights into this unexpected link.

As we wade through the depths of this unusual correlation, one thing becomes abundantly clear: the world of research is not without its surprises. Just like the unexpected pleasure of finding a dollar in an old jacket, uncovering connections between seemingly distant concepts brings a sense of both delight and intrigue. The interplay between US bottled water consumption and solar power generation in Guinea may still be shrouded in mystery, but our thirst for knowledge drives us forward, much like a refreshing glass of water on a scorching day. So, as we journey further into this enigmatic realm, remember that even in the scholarly pursuit of knowledge, a bit of humor can be the "water" that irrigates the fields of discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the mysteriously entwined relationship between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Guinea, our research team employed a mixed methods approach that combined quantitative data analysis with a touch of speculative reasoning. We aimed to quench our curiosity using a sip of statistical analysis and a dash of theoretical speculation - because sometimes, scientific inquiry needs more than just a gulp of logical reasoning; it needs a refreshing twist of creativity. It's like adding a slice of lemon to your water - unexpected, but pleasantly tangy.

Firstly, we delved into the depths of data collected from Statista and the Energy Information Administration. We meticulously extracted information spanning the years 2009 to 2021, ensuring that our data net was cast wide enough to capture any curious correlations that might have slipped through the cracks. Our approach was akin to a fisherman casting a wide net - we were determined to catch any glimmers of connection between bottled water consumption and solar power generation, even if they were as elusive as a sardine in the sea.

Next, we indulged in a bit of number-crunching. With our trusty calculators by our side and our thinking caps securely fastened, we computed correlation coefficients and conducted regression analyses to tease out the intricate dance between these seemingly unrelated variables. We approached this step with the precision of a chef measuring ingredients - after all, in the kitchen of scientific inquiry, precision is the key ingredient, much like how salt is the key to a good dad joke - sometimes unexpected, but always a delightful sprinkle of humor.

Furthermore, in the spirit of scientific exploration, we engaged in a speculative brainstorming session, where we donned our proverbial thinking caps to ponder the potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected correlation. Like sailors navigating through uncharted waters, we entertained various hypotheses that ranged from the plausible to the whimsical, embracing the imaginative journey of scientific inquiry with the buoyancy of a playful dolphin in the sea of knowledge.

It's important to note that while our approach may seem whimsical at times, we stayed true to the principles of rigorous scientific inquiry. We cross-checked our findings, scrutinized our methods, and peppered our analysis with skepticism in a manner reminiscent of a discerning connoisseur tasting a fine wine - because just as a fine wine reveals its complexities and surprises, so too does the correlation between bottled water consumption and solar power generation.

In sum, our methodology was a blend of meticulous data analysis, speculative reasoning, and a touch of whimsy - because, in the world of scientific inquiry, sometimes the unexpected is just what's needed to turn a quirky correlation into a eureka moment. And after all, in the pursuit of knowledge, a good dad joke can be the spark that ignites the torch of discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Solar power generated in Guinea. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2009 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9188259, r-squared of 0.8442410, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Sunny Side Up: Shedding Light on the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Solar Power in Guinea"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the uncharted waters of investigating the curious connection between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Guinea. As we navigate through these unexpected pairings, we aim to shed light on the underlying factors at play, all while keeping our spirits bright with a dash of humor - because let's face it, research can sometimes leave us feeling parched, but a good dad joke can be a refreshing sip of relief.

Our research team diligently combed through data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration to not only quench our curiosity, but also to quench the thirst for knowledge in the scientific community. Analyzing the years 2009 to 2021, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9188259 and p < 0.01, suggesting a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Now, you may be thinking, "What in the world does bottled water consumption in the US have to do with solar power in Guinea?" Well, hold on to your solar panels, because here comes a sun-kissed dad joke: It appears that these two may be linked by a "solar thirst" phenomenon, where as the sun shines brighter, so does the demand for bottled hydration. The causality behind this correlation remains a puzzle, but it's certainly not a "bottle-neck" in our understanding - pun intended.

As we revel in the quirky connection between these contrasting elements, one thing is clear: the world of scientific inquiry never ceases to surprise us, much like a refreshing bottle of water on a scorching day. So, whether you're basking in the sun's rays or pondering the mysteries of bottled water and solar power, remember that even in the realm of academia, a little humor can "lighten" the load of knowledge.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The interplay between seemingly unrelated variables has always piqued the curiosity of researchers. As we embark on our quest to uncover the connection between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Guinea, we find ourselves treading into unexplored territory, akin to solar-powered submarines. Speaking of submarines, did you hear about the deep-sea diver who fell in love? It was a case of "pressure" mounting.
Our exploration into this puzzling relationship is motivated by the desire to unearth the underlying mechanisms that tie these disparate elements together. Much like a solar eclipse, where the sun and moon briefly align, our study aims to shed light on the alignment of bottled water habits and solar power generation. After all, it seems that these two domains are not as far apart as the Pacific and the Atlantic.
The motivation to delve into these unlikely bedfellows comes from the recognition that the pursuit of knowledge, like a good refreshment, often leaves us wanting more. It is this thirst for understanding that propels us to inquire about the potential links between a nation's preference for bottled water and another nation's reliance on solar energy. One may even say we're embarking on a "solar-powered" quest for knowledge.
As we survey the landscape of data pertaining to bottled water consumption in the US and solar power generation in Guinea, we are acutely aware of the need to quench our curiosity while maintaining a well-hydrated sense of humor. Because, let's face it, the world of research can sometimes leave us feeling parched, but a good dad joke can be the oasis in the data desert. Speaking of oases, what did one oasis say to the other oasis? "Long time, no sea!"
The correlation coefficient of 0.9188259 and p < 0.01 that emerged from our analysis of the years between 2009 and 2021 was striking, to say the least. It suggests a remarkably strong relationship between the consumption of bottled water in the US and the generation of solar power in Guinea. The strength of this correlation, much like a camel's thirst in the desert, leaves us not only surprised but also thirsty for more insights into this unexpected link.

As we wade through the depths of this unusual correlation, one thing becomes abundantly clear: the world of research is not without its surprises. Just like the unexpected pleasure of finding a dollar in an old jacket, uncovering connections between seemingly distant concepts brings a sense of both delight and intrigue. The interplay between US bottled water consumption and solar power generation in Guinea may still be shrouded in mystery, but our thirst for knowledge drives us forward, much like a refreshing glass of water on a scorching day. So, as we journey further into this enigmatic realm, remember that even in the scholarly pursuit of knowledge, a bit of humor can be the "water" that irrigates the fields of discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The culmination of our research revealed a statistically significant correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Guinea. Consistent with our hypotheses, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9188259, an r-squared value of 0.8442410, and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two disparate variables. The strength of this connection, much like a well-hydrated cactus, took us by surprise and left us thirsting for further understanding.

Fig. 1 depicts the bountiful fruits of our labor, showcasing the robust correlation between US bottled water consumption and solar power generated in Guinea. The scatterplot hints at a seemingly symbiotic relationship, as if the sun and bottled water have formed a tacit agreement to soak up the rays of solar power together, much like a refreshing duo venturing on a "ray-diant" journey.

Our findings support the hypothesis of a "solar thirst" phenomenon, wherein increased solar power generation in Guinea coincides with amplified demand for bottled water in the US. The causality of this relationship remains an enigma, much like a mirage in the desert, but it's clear that there's more to this connection than meets the eye. It seems that the sun's luminance casts more than just shadows and rays - it also illuminates the unexpected ties between seemingly unrelated elements.

In the grand tapestry of scientific inquiry, our discovery of this peculiar association serves as a reminder that the quest for knowledge, while serious in its pursuit, is not devoid of levity. Just as a refreshing sip of water can invigorate the senses, so can a lighthearted jest provide a spirited boost to the academic journey. After all, in the realm of scholarly pursuits, a bit of humor can be the "light" that brightens the corridors of discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Solar power generated in Guinea. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Sunny Side Up: Shedding Light on the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Solar Power in Guinea"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the uncharted waters of investigating the curious connection between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Guinea. As we navigate through these unexpected pairings, we aim to shed light on the underlying factors at play, all while keeping our spirits bright with a dash of humor - because let's face it, research can sometimes leave us feeling parched, but a good dad joke can be a refreshing sip of relief.

Our research team diligently combed through data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration to not only quench our curiosity, but also to quench the thirst for knowledge in the scientific community. Analyzing the years 2009 to 2021, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9188259 and p < 0.01, suggesting a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Now, you may be thinking, "What in the world does bottled water consumption in the US have to do with solar power in Guinea?" Well, hold on to your solar panels, because here comes a sun-kissed dad joke: It appears that these two may be linked by a "solar thirst" phenomenon, where as the sun shines brighter, so does the demand for bottled hydration. The causality behind this correlation remains a puzzle, but it's certainly not a "bottle-neck" in our understanding - pun intended.

As we revel in the quirky connection between these contrasting elements, one thing is clear: the world of scientific inquiry never ceases to surprise us, much like a refreshing bottle of water on a scorching day. So, whether you're basking in the sun's rays or pondering the mysteries of bottled water and solar power, remember that even in the realm of academia, a little humor can "lighten" the load of knowledge.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
As we navigate through the unexpected correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Guinea, we are reminded of the profound curiosity about the interplay between seemingly disparate variables. In "Water and Energy: Threats and Opportunities" by Smith, the authors examine the complex relationship between human consumption of water and energy generation, prompting us to reconsider the boundary-breaking possibilities that underlie our research. The study illuminates the intricate web of connections within the realm of resource consumption, much like a solar-powered light bulb illuminates a room in the evening.
Speaking of illumination, in "Solar Power: Technologies, Environmental Impact, and Future Prospects" by Doe, the exploration of solar power generation takes center stage, highlighting the potential for renewable energy sources. This prompts us to consider the broader implications of our investigation, much like how a solar panel converts sunlight into electricity. After all, it's important to stay sunny side up when delving into such intriguing topics - pun intended.
In addition to academic literature, real-life examples of unexpected connections between seemingly unrelated elements can be found in books like "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, and "The Tipping Point" by Malcolm Gladwell. These works delve into the surprising dynamics that drive various phenomena, showing us that unconventional relationships are not as rare as finding water in the desert - pun intended.
Speaking of unconventional relationships, who would have thought that a Facebook post about a guinea pig enjoying a sunny day and a tweet about the benefits of drinking water could provide tangentially relevant insights? These social media snippets serve as whimsical reminders that the world is rife with unexpected connections, much like stumbling upon a well-timed dad joke when least expected.
In "Solar Power for Dummies" by Rik DeGunther, the authors elucidate the intricacies of solar energy in a light-hearted manner, serving as a beacon of humor in the often complex world of renewable energy. It's a gentle nudge to remind us that even in the realm of academia, a good dad joke can be the oasis in the midst of rigorous research - much like a solar-powered water pump in the desert.

[[RESULTS]]
The culmination of our research revealed a statistically significant correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Guinea. Consistent with our hypotheses, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9188259, an r-squared value of 0.8442410, and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two disparate variables. The strength of this connection, much like a well-hydrated cactus, took us by surprise and left us thirsting for further understanding.
Fig. 1 depicts the bountiful fruits of our labor, showcasing the robust correlation between US bottled water consumption and solar power generated in Guinea. The scatterplot hints at a seemingly symbiotic relationship, as if the sun and bottled water have formed a tacit agreement to soak up the rays of solar power together, much like a refreshing duo venturing on a "ray-diant" journey.
Our findings support the hypothesis of a "solar thirst" phenomenon, wherein increased solar power generation in Guinea coincides with amplified demand for bottled water in the US. The causality of this relationship remains an enigma, much like a mirage in the desert, but it's clear that there's more to this connection than meets the eye. It seems that the sun's luminance casts more than just shadows and rays - it also illuminates the unexpected ties between seemingly unrelated elements.
In the grand tapestry of scientific inquiry, our discovery of this peculiar association serves as a reminder that the quest for knowledge, while serious in its pursuit, is not devoid of levity. Just as a refreshing sip of water can invigorate the senses, so can a lighthearted jest provide a spirited boost to the academic journey. After all, in the realm of scholarly pursuits, a bit of humor can be the "light" that brightens the corridors of discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

In the aftermath of our investigation into the unexpectedly strong correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Guinea, we find ourselves bathed in newfound insights and well-hydrated with knowledge. Our results support the prior research, shedding light on the sun-kissed connection between these seemingly disparate variables.

Our discovery of a "solar thirst" phenomenon, where increased solar power generation in Guinea coincides with heightened demand for bottled water in the US, lends credence to the works that have pieced together unexpected relationships between seemingly unrelated elements. Just as a solar panel converts sunlight into electricity, our findings reflect the conversion of solar energy into a demand for hydration - a convergence that may leave some scratching their heads, much like a solar-powered sunscreen.

The literature review provided glimpses of these unexpected connections, much like stumbling upon a well-timed dad joke when least expected. Smith's "Water and Energy: Threats and Opportunities" hinted at the intricate web of connections within resource consumption, akin to the intertwined relationship between bottled water consumption and solar power generation. Similarly, Doe's exploration of solar power in "Solar Power: Technologies, Environmental Impact, and Future Prospects" illuminated the potential for renewable energy, mirroring the unexpected potential in our findings.

As we bask in the glow of our results, it becomes clear that the world of scientific inquiry thrives on uncovering unexpected connections, much like the pleasant surprise of a well-executed pun. Our investigation, while serious in its pursuit, serves as a gentle reminder that even in the realm of academia, a good dad joke can illuminate the corridors of discovery. After all, in the pursuit of knowledge, a bit of humor can be the "light" that brightens the scholarly journey, much like a ray of sunshine breaking through the clouds.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Solar power generated in Guinea. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Sunny Side Up: Shedding Light on the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Solar Power in Guinea"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the uncharted waters of investigating the curious connection between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Guinea. As we navigate through these unexpected pairings, we aim to shed light on the underlying factors at play, all while keeping our spirits bright with a dash of humor - because let's face it, research can sometimes leave us feeling parched, but a good dad joke can be a refreshing sip of relief.

Our research team diligently combed through data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration to not only quench our curiosity, but also to quench the thirst for knowledge in the scientific community. Analyzing the years 2009 to 2021, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9188259 and p < 0.01, suggesting a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Now, you may be thinking, "What in the world does bottled water consumption in the US have to do with solar power in Guinea?" Well, hold on to your solar panels, because here comes a sun-kissed dad joke: It appears that these two may be linked by a "solar thirst" phenomenon, where as the sun shines brighter, so does the demand for bottled hydration. The causality behind this correlation remains a puzzle, but it's certainly not a "bottle-neck" in our understanding - pun intended.

As we revel in the quirky connection between these contrasting elements, one thing is clear: the world of scientific inquiry never ceases to surprise us, much like a refreshing bottle of water on a scorching day. So, whether you're basking in the sun's rays or pondering the mysteries of bottled water and solar power, remember that even in the realm of academia, a little humor can "lighten" the load of knowledge.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The interplay between seemingly unrelated variables has always piqued the curiosity of researchers. As we embark on our quest to uncover the connection between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Guinea, we find ourselves treading into unexplored territory, akin to solar-powered submarines. Speaking of submarines, did you hear about the deep-sea diver who fell in love? It was a case of "pressure" mounting.
Our exploration into this puzzling relationship is motivated by the desire to unearth the underlying mechanisms that tie these disparate elements together. Much like a solar eclipse, where the sun and moon briefly align, our study aims to shed light on the alignment of bottled water habits and solar power generation. After all, it seems that these two domains are not as far apart as the Pacific and the Atlantic.
The motivation to delve into these unlikely bedfellows comes from the recognition that the pursuit of knowledge, like a good refreshment, often leaves us wanting more. It is this thirst for understanding that propels us to inquire about the potential links between a nation's preference for bottled water and another nation's reliance on solar energy. One may even say we're embarking on a "solar-powered" quest for knowledge.
As we survey the landscape of data pertaining to bottled water consumption in the US and solar power generation in Guinea, we are acutely aware of the need to quench our curiosity while maintaining a well-hydrated sense of humor. Because, let's face it, the world of research can sometimes leave us feeling parched, but a good dad joke can be the oasis in the data desert. Speaking of oases, what did one oasis say to the other oasis? "Long time, no sea!"
The correlation coefficient of 0.9188259 and p < 0.01 that emerged from our analysis of the years between 2009 and 2021 was striking, to say the least. It suggests a remarkably strong relationship between the consumption of bottled water in the US and the generation of solar power in Guinea. The strength of this correlation, much like a camel's thirst in the desert, leaves us not only surprised but also thirsty for more insights into this unexpected link.

As we wade through the depths of this unusual correlation, one thing becomes abundantly clear: the world of research is not without its surprises. Just like the unexpected pleasure of finding a dollar in an old jacket, uncovering connections between seemingly distant concepts brings a sense of both delight and intrigue. The interplay between US bottled water consumption and solar power generation in Guinea may still be shrouded in mystery, but our thirst for knowledge drives us forward, much like a refreshing glass of water on a scorching day. So, as we journey further into this enigmatic realm, remember that even in the scholarly pursuit of knowledge, a bit of humor can be the "water" that irrigates the fields of discovery.

[[RESULTS]]
The culmination of our research revealed a statistically significant correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Guinea. Consistent with our hypotheses, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9188259, an r-squared value of 0.8442410, and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two disparate variables. The strength of this connection, much like a well-hydrated cactus, took us by surprise and left us thirsting for further understanding.
Fig. 1 depicts the bountiful fruits of our labor, showcasing the robust correlation between US bottled water consumption and solar power generated in Guinea. The scatterplot hints at a seemingly symbiotic relationship, as if the sun and bottled water have formed a tacit agreement to soak up the rays of solar power together, much like a refreshing duo venturing on a "ray-diant" journey.
Our findings support the hypothesis of a "solar thirst" phenomenon, wherein increased solar power generation in Guinea coincides with amplified demand for bottled water in the US. The causality of this relationship remains an enigma, much like a mirage in the desert, but it's clear that there's more to this connection than meets the eye. It seems that the sun's luminance casts more than just shadows and rays - it also illuminates the unexpected ties between seemingly unrelated elements.
In the grand tapestry of scientific inquiry, our discovery of this peculiar association serves as a reminder that the quest for knowledge, while serious in its pursuit, is not devoid of levity. Just as a refreshing sip of water can invigorate the senses, so can a lighthearted jest provide a spirited boost to the academic journey. After all, in the realm of scholarly pursuits, a bit of humor can be the "light" that brightens the corridors of discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has illuminated a surprising relationship between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Guinea. The remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9188259 and a p-value less than 0.01 suggest that these seemingly disparate variables are indeed entwined like the twisting coils of a garden hose. Our findings not only quench our thirst for knowledge but also remind us that even in the realm of academia, a refreshing splash of humor can irrigate the intellectual field.

Much like a solar-powered flashlight, this study has shed light on the unexpected alliance between solar power and bottled water consumption. It seems that as the sun's rays shine brighter, so does the demand for quenching one's "solar thirst." This correlation, much like a solar panel in need of a recharge, leaves us thirsting for further insights.

It's clear that this quirky connection is more than just a "bottle-neck" in our understanding; it's a refreshing sip of knowledge that reminds us of the unexpected surprises that research can unveil. But as we've basked in the illuminating glow of these findings, we can confidently say, "Watt a discovery!"

In light of these results, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. After all, when it comes to the correlation between US bottled water consumption and solar power in Guinea, we've already quenched our curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Sunny Side Up: Shedding Light on the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Solar Power in Guinea. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Solar Beverage Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Sunny Side Up: Shedding Light on the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Solar Power in Guinea. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Solar Energy and Aquatic Resources Institute (SEARI)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Sunny Side Up: Shedding Light on the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Solar Power in Guinea with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the uncharted waters of investigating the curious connection between US bottled water consumption per person and solar power generated in Guinea. As we navigate through these unexpected pairings, we aim to shed light on the underlying factors at play, all while keeping our spirits bright with a dash of humor - because let's face it, research can sometimes leave us feeling parched, but a good dad joke can be a refreshing sip of relief.
Our research team diligently combed through data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration to not only quench our curiosity, but also to quench the thirst for knowledge in the scientific community. Analyzing the years 2009 to 2021, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9188259 and p < 0.01, suggesting a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables.
Now, you may be thinking, "What in the world does bottled water consumption in the US have to do with solar power in Guinea?" Well, hold on to your solar panels, because here comes a sun-kissed dad joke: It appears that these two may be linked by a "solar thirst" phenomenon, where as the sun shines brighter, so does the demand for bottled hydration. The causality behind this correlation remains a puzzle, but it's certainly not a "bottle-neck" in our understanding - pun intended.
As we revel in the quirky connection between these contrasting elements, one thing is clear: the world of scientific inquiry never ceases to surprise us, much like a refreshing bottle of water on a scorching day. So, whether you're basking in the sun's rays or pondering the mysteries of bottled water and solar power, remember that even in the realm of academia, a little humor can "lighten" the load of knowledge.

ChatGPT:

US bottled water consumption, solar power in Guinea, correlation analysis, statistical significance, environmental impact, renewable energy, consumer behavior, research findings

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

US Bottled Water Consumption per Person
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with US Bottled Water Consumption per Person

Solar power generated in Guinea
Detailed data title: Total solar power generated in Guinea in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Solar power generated in Guinea

Correlation r = 0.9188259 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8442410 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Solar power generated in Guinea) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., US Bottled Water Consumption per Person) over the 13 years from 2009 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.1E-6. 0.0000091339128572626020000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 0.00091% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 109,482 random variables You don't actually need 109 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.75, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
US Bottled Water Consumption per Person (Gallons)27.628.329.230.83234.136.5394242.34445.247
Solar power generated in Guinea (Billion kWh)0.00090.00090.00090.00090.0050.0050.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.021




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([27.6,28.3,29.2,30.8,32,34.1,36.5,39,42,42.3,44,45.2,47,])
array_2 = np.array([0.0009,0.0009,0.0009,0.0009,0.005,0.005,0.021,0.021,0.021,0.021,0.021,0.021,0.021,])
array_1_name = "US Bottled Water Consumption per Person"
array_2_name = "Solar power generated in Guinea"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 3765 · Black Variable ID: 32 · Red Variable ID: 23711
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0