about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,722 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and the second variable is Arson in New Jersey.  The chart goes from 1985 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

It's believed that as the air quality improved in Atlantic City, the infamous smell of burnt casinos and money became less potent, leading to a decrease in the urge to start fires for unconventional air freshening purposes. The correlation is strengthened by the fact that as people were no longer constantly surrounded by a smoky atmosphere, they were less likely to mistake actual emergency situations for just another day in Atlantic City.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Certainly! Here's an image generation prompt that captures the essence of a comic-book-style illustration with a muted color palette and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s for the given scene: Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s depicting Atlantic City, New Jersey. The city skyline transitions from a hazy view to a clear and fresh scene. The bright blue sky is free from smog, and firefighters are seen swiftly responding to a small fire on the horizon, quickly extinguishing it. The improved air quality not only brings relief to the city but also aids in preventing arson. Capture the simplicity of the scene without including any words or speech bubbles. This prompt aims to create a visually striking and compelling illustration with a comic-book aesthetic, showcasing the transformation of the city skyline and the vigilant response of the firefighters in the newfound clear atmosphere. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and Arson in New Jersey. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Parallax art Parallax art Cyber folk Cyberpunk A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and Arson in New Jersey, in the following situation: Decrease in air pollution led to clearer skies, making it easier for firefighters to spot and stop arsonists in New Jersey.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Atlantic City, New Jersey, the once hazy skyline has transformed into a clear and fresh view. The bright blue sky is now free from the heavy smog that once clouded it. As a result, firefighters can be seen swiftly responding to a small fire on the horizon, quickly extinguishing it before it grows. The improved air quality not only brings relief to the city, but also aids in the efforts to prevent arson, as firefighters can now easily spot and tackle any potential threats.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In Atlantic City, New Jersey, the once hazy skyline has transformed into a clear and fresh view. The bright blue sky is now free from the heavy smog that once clouded it. As a result, firefighters can be seen swiftly responding to a small fire on the horizon, quickly extinguishing it before it grows. The improved air quality not only brings relief to the city, but also aids in the efforts to prevent arson, as firefighters can now easily spot and tackle any potential threats. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Certainly! Here's an image generation prompt that captures the essence of a comic-book-style illustration with a muted color palette and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s for the given scene: Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s depicting Atlantic City, New Jersey. The city skyline transitions from a hazy view to a clear and fresh scene. The bright blue sky is free from smog, and firefighters are seen swiftly responding to a small fire on the horizon, quickly extinguishing it. The improved air quality not only brings relief to the city but also aids in preventing arson. Capture the simplicity of the scene without including any words or speech bubbles. This prompt aims to create a visually striking and compelling illustration with a comic-book aesthetic, showcasing the transformation of the city skyline and the vigilant response of the firefighters in the newfound clear atmosphere.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey caused Arson in New Jersey to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Soot and the Spontaneous: Air Pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and Arson in New Jersey

Journal of Ecological Anomalies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and Arson in New Jersey. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8910710 and p < 0.01 for 1985 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Soot and the Spontaneous: Air Pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and Arson in New Jersey

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research presents a fiery investigation into the potential relationship between air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and incidents of arson across the state. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our study unfolds a lively correlation coefficient of 0.8910710 and p < 0.01 for the years 1985 to 2022. We breathe life into the debate about whether the hazy skies of Atlantic City may have lit a fire under the perpetrators of arson. Our findings may ignite further inquiry into the smokin' hot topic of environmental influences on criminal behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and Arson in New Jersey. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Soot and the Spontaneous: Air Pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and Arson in New Jersey

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research presents a fiery investigation into the potential relationship between air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and incidents of arson across the state. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our study unfolds a lively correlation coefficient of 0.8910710 and p < 0.01 for the years 1985 to 2022. We breathe life into the debate about whether the hazy skies of Atlantic City may have lit a fire under the perpetrators of arson. Our findings may ignite further inquiry into the smokin' hot topic of environmental influences on criminal behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the grand spectacle of statistical analysis and tongue-in-cheek academic inquiry. We invite you to join us in unraveling the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in the bustling city of Atlantic City, New Jersey, and the fiery occurrences of arson that have ignited headlines across the state.

As the curtain rises on this scintillating paper, we embark on a journey to demystify the potential link between the sooty clouds hovering over Atlantic City and the spontaneous combustion of criminal behavior elsewhere in New Jersey. This is not your average whodunit; no, this is a statistical escapade that sets out to answer the burning question: Does air pollution fan the flames of arson?

With the stage set, our research aims to cast a beacon of statistical certainty onto the murky intersection of environmental conditions and criminal activity. Through sophisticated data analysis and a dash of academic pizzazz, we seek to illuminate the empirical dynamics underpinning this smoldering conundrum.

The stakes are high, the evidence is smokin', and we are poised to explore how the atmospheric peculiarities of Atlantic City may have kindled a fervor for criminal mischief across the state. So, dear audience, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a riveting journey into the heart of statistical mischief and ecological intrigue. The show is about to begin, and the findings are sure to set the academic world ablaze!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and Arson in New Jersey. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Soot and the Spontaneous: Air Pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and Arson in New Jersey

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research presents a fiery investigation into the potential relationship between air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and incidents of arson across the state. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our study unfolds a lively correlation coefficient of 0.8910710 and p < 0.01 for the years 1985 to 2022. We breathe life into the debate about whether the hazy skies of Atlantic City may have lit a fire under the perpetrators of arson. Our findings may ignite further inquiry into the smokin' hot topic of environmental influences on criminal behavior.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the grand spectacle of statistical analysis and tongue-in-cheek academic inquiry. We invite you to join us in unraveling the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in the bustling city of Atlantic City, New Jersey, and the fiery occurrences of arson that have ignited headlines across the state.
As the curtain rises on this scintillating paper, we embark on a journey to demystify the potential link between the sooty clouds hovering over Atlantic City and the spontaneous combustion of criminal behavior elsewhere in New Jersey. This is not your average whodunit; no, this is a statistical escapade that sets out to answer the burning question: Does air pollution fan the flames of arson?
With the stage set, our research aims to cast a beacon of statistical certainty onto the murky intersection of environmental conditions and criminal activity. Through sophisticated data analysis and a dash of academic pizzazz, we seek to illuminate the empirical dynamics underpinning this smoldering conundrum.
The stakes are high, the evidence is smokin', and we are poised to explore how the atmospheric peculiarities of Atlantic City may have kindled a fervor for criminal mischief across the state. So, dear audience, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a riveting journey into the heart of statistical mischief and ecological intrigue. The show is about to begin, and the findings are sure to set the academic world ablaze!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

As we wade through the quagmire of previous research, we encounter a plethora of studies shedding light on the relationship between air pollution and criminal behavior. Smith et al. (2015) posited a potential association between environmental conditions and urban crime rates, while Doe and Jones (2018) investigated the impact of air quality on various forms of delinquency. However, our investigation takes a plunge into uncharted waters, examining the specific interplay between the hazy skyline of Atlantic City and the fiery underworld of arson across New Jersey.

Moving beyond the academic realm, "The Air Pollution and Arson Chronicles" by Environmentalist Edna prudently draws attention to the potential consequences of tainted air on pyromaniacal inclinations. Moreover, the intriguing work of Economist Ernest on "Emissions and Eruptions" highlights the hidden economic costs of fire-related incidents in polluted urban areas, thrusting this debate into the fiery crucible of economic analysis.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, the timeless classic "Smoke and Mirrors" by Literary Luminary Linda offers a whimsical take on the enigmatic connection between smog and spontaneous combustion, while the spellbinding tale of "The Arsonist's Alibi" by Mystery Maven Mark weaves a gripping narrative around the mysterious influence of polluted air on criminal motives.

Drawing inspiration from the enthralling world of board games, "Flames of Fortune" cryptically illuminates the unseen forces at play in the cityscape, where the roll of the dice may spell the difference between a sooty tragedy and a smoking hot victory. Meanwhile, "Pollutant Pursuit" offers a thrilling chase through the labyrinthine streets of Atlantic City, where players must navigate the murky aftermath of industrial emissions while evading the clutches of crime.

With our feet firmly planted in the empirical terrain, we harken back to the scholarly corpus, eyes agleam with the fiery fervor of inquiry, as we kindle the flames of curiosity and embark on a quest to untangle the smoky enigma of air pollution and arson.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and Arson in New Jersey. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 1985 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Soot and the Spontaneous: Air Pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and Arson in New Jersey

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research presents a fiery investigation into the potential relationship between air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and incidents of arson across the state. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our study unfolds a lively correlation coefficient of 0.8910710 and p < 0.01 for the years 1985 to 2022. We breathe life into the debate about whether the hazy skies of Atlantic City may have lit a fire under the perpetrators of arson. Our findings may ignite further inquiry into the smokin' hot topic of environmental influences on criminal behavior.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the grand spectacle of statistical analysis and tongue-in-cheek academic inquiry. We invite you to join us in unraveling the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in the bustling city of Atlantic City, New Jersey, and the fiery occurrences of arson that have ignited headlines across the state.
As the curtain rises on this scintillating paper, we embark on a journey to demystify the potential link between the sooty clouds hovering over Atlantic City and the spontaneous combustion of criminal behavior elsewhere in New Jersey. This is not your average whodunit; no, this is a statistical escapade that sets out to answer the burning question: Does air pollution fan the flames of arson?
With the stage set, our research aims to cast a beacon of statistical certainty onto the murky intersection of environmental conditions and criminal activity. Through sophisticated data analysis and a dash of academic pizzazz, we seek to illuminate the empirical dynamics underpinning this smoldering conundrum.
The stakes are high, the evidence is smokin', and we are poised to explore how the atmospheric peculiarities of Atlantic City may have kindled a fervor for criminal mischief across the state. So, dear audience, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a riveting journey into the heart of statistical mischief and ecological intrigue. The show is about to begin, and the findings are sure to set the academic world ablaze!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To sizzle up our inquiry, we crafted a doubly delectable methodology that would not only spark interest but also provide robust empirical insights. Our data collection harnessed the brilliance of the internet, where we roamed far and wide through the digital ether to gather information from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. Much like intrepid detectives, we scoured the reported levels of air pollutants in the environs of Atlantic City, New Jersey, and cross-referenced these with the official records of arson incidents across the Garden State.

We engaged in a delightful dance of statistical wizardry, employing sophisticated analysis methods to tease out the potential interplay between the sooty shroud blanketing Atlantic City and the fiery misadventures of arsonists elsewhere in New Jersey. Our time-spanning escapade covered the years from 1985 to 2022, allowing us to capture the dynamic fluctuations of air quality and the ebbs and flows of arson activity over nearly four decades.

For our keen-eyed statistical enthusiasts, buckle up as we whisk you through the spellbinding corridors of correlation analysis. We calculated the Pearson correlation coefficient to quantify the relationship between air pollution levels in Atlantic City and the incidence of arson across the state. Our jazzy statistical software sang like a symphony orchestra as it regaled us with coefficients, p-values, and confidence intervals, illuminating the potential strength and significance of the link between air pollution and the incendiary exploits of arsonists.

In addition to our daring correlation capers, we flexed our analytical muscles with a tantalizing time series analysis, tracing the temporal patterns of air pollution and arson over the years. Unraveling this cognitive labyrinth, we sought to discern whether the peaks and troughs of air pollution in Atlantic City danced in harmonious syncopation with the peaks and troughs of arson incidents. Our goal? To unveil the temporal choreography of atmospheric influence on the blazing proclivities of potential perpetrators.

Lastly, we festooned our methodology with a playful yet potent dose of spatial analysis, mapping the geographical dispersion of arson incidents against the sprawling canvas of air pollution levels. This cartographic escapade allowed us to visualize the geographical connect-the-dots between the murky clouds of Atlantic City and the scattered embers of arson occurrences across the state, casting a spatial spotlight on the potential sway of air quality on fiery fiascos.

And so, armed with a merry melange of statistical techniques and research gusto, our methodology sashayed through the tumultuous terrain of air pollution and arson, leaving no statistical stone unturned in our quest to unravel the combustible mysteries lurking within the environmental tapestry of New Jersey.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and Arson in New Jersey. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 1985 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8910710, r-squared of 0.7940075, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Soot and the Spontaneous: Air Pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and Arson in New Jersey

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research presents a fiery investigation into the potential relationship between air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and incidents of arson across the state. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our study unfolds a lively correlation coefficient of 0.8910710 and p < 0.01 for the years 1985 to 2022. We breathe life into the debate about whether the hazy skies of Atlantic City may have lit a fire under the perpetrators of arson. Our findings may ignite further inquiry into the smokin' hot topic of environmental influences on criminal behavior.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the grand spectacle of statistical analysis and tongue-in-cheek academic inquiry. We invite you to join us in unraveling the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in the bustling city of Atlantic City, New Jersey, and the fiery occurrences of arson that have ignited headlines across the state.
As the curtain rises on this scintillating paper, we embark on a journey to demystify the potential link between the sooty clouds hovering over Atlantic City and the spontaneous combustion of criminal behavior elsewhere in New Jersey. This is not your average whodunit; no, this is a statistical escapade that sets out to answer the burning question: Does air pollution fan the flames of arson?
With the stage set, our research aims to cast a beacon of statistical certainty onto the murky intersection of environmental conditions and criminal activity. Through sophisticated data analysis and a dash of academic pizzazz, we seek to illuminate the empirical dynamics underpinning this smoldering conundrum.
The stakes are high, the evidence is smokin', and we are poised to explore how the atmospheric peculiarities of Atlantic City may have kindled a fervor for criminal mischief across the state. So, dear audience, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a riveting journey into the heart of statistical mischief and ecological intrigue. The show is about to begin, and the findings are sure to set the academic world ablaze!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation set the stage ablaze, illuminating a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.8910710 between air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and incidents of arson state-wide. This fiery relationship, characterized by an r-squared of 0.7940075, has truly sparked our enthusiasm for exploring the smoggy ambiance of Atlantic City and its potential influence on illicit activities across New Jersey.

The scintillating correlation uncovered in our analysis is depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot that vividly captures the incendiary connection between air pollution and arson. We were struck by the illuminating pattern of this plot, which paints a compelling portrait of the smoky tendrils of pollution reaching out to light the infernos of criminal activity in various parts of the state.

The statistical fireworks continued to dazzle as we examined the p-value, which gleefully danced beneath the fabled threshold of 0.01. This sizzling significance level provided unequivocal evidence that the relationship between air pollution in Atlantic City and incidents of arson in New Jersey is not some mere wisp of a correlation, but a bona fide inferno of statistical significance.

In scrutinizing these findings, one cannot help but wonder whether the sooty embrace of Atlantic City's polluted air may indeed fuel the flames of criminal intent in the fertile ground of the Garden State. Our research not only sheds light on this inquiry but also fans the flames of curiosity, encouraging further investigation into the fiery tapestry of environmental influences on criminal behavior.

So, in the immortal words of legendary arson investigator Red Adair, "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional, wait until you hire an amateur." Let this research ignite the professional fervor for understanding the complex interplay of environmental factors and human behavior, and may it serve as a beacon in the smoggy skirmish between science and the fiery intricacies of human conduct.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and Arson in New Jersey. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Soot and the Spontaneous: Air Pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and Arson in New Jersey

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research presents a fiery investigation into the potential relationship between air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and incidents of arson across the state. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our study unfolds a lively correlation coefficient of 0.8910710 and p < 0.01 for the years 1985 to 2022. We breathe life into the debate about whether the hazy skies of Atlantic City may have lit a fire under the perpetrators of arson. Our findings may ignite further inquiry into the smokin' hot topic of environmental influences on criminal behavior.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
As we wade through the quagmire of previous research, we encounter a plethora of studies shedding light on the relationship between air pollution and criminal behavior. Smith et al. (2015) posited a potential association between environmental conditions and urban crime rates, while Doe and Jones (2018) investigated the impact of air quality on various forms of delinquency. However, our investigation takes a plunge into uncharted waters, examining the specific interplay between the hazy skyline of Atlantic City and the fiery underworld of arson across New Jersey.
Moving beyond the academic realm, "The Air Pollution and Arson Chronicles" by Environmentalist Edna prudently draws attention to the potential consequences of tainted air on pyromaniacal inclinations. Moreover, the intriguing work of Economist Ernest on "Emissions and Eruptions" highlights the hidden economic costs of fire-related incidents in polluted urban areas, thrusting this debate into the fiery crucible of economic analysis.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, the timeless classic "Smoke and Mirrors" by Literary Luminary Linda offers a whimsical take on the enigmatic connection between smog and spontaneous combustion, while the spellbinding tale of "The Arsonist's Alibi" by Mystery Maven Mark weaves a gripping narrative around the mysterious influence of polluted air on criminal motives.
Drawing inspiration from the enthralling world of board games, "Flames of Fortune" cryptically illuminates the unseen forces at play in the cityscape, where the roll of the dice may spell the difference between a sooty tragedy and a smoking hot victory. Meanwhile, "Pollutant Pursuit" offers a thrilling chase through the labyrinthine streets of Atlantic City, where players must navigate the murky aftermath of industrial emissions while evading the clutches of crime.
With our feet firmly planted in the empirical terrain, we harken back to the scholarly corpus, eyes agleam with the fiery fervor of inquiry, as we kindle the flames of curiosity and embark on a quest to untangle the smoky enigma of air pollution and arson.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation set the stage ablaze, illuminating a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.8910710 between air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and incidents of arson state-wide. This fiery relationship, characterized by an r-squared of 0.7940075, has truly sparked our enthusiasm for exploring the smoggy ambiance of Atlantic City and its potential influence on illicit activities across New Jersey.
The scintillating correlation uncovered in our analysis is depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot that vividly captures the incendiary connection between air pollution and arson. We were struck by the illuminating pattern of this plot, which paints a compelling portrait of the smoky tendrils of pollution reaching out to light the infernos of criminal activity in various parts of the state.
The statistical fireworks continued to dazzle as we examined the p-value, which gleefully danced beneath the fabled threshold of 0.01. This sizzling significance level provided unequivocal evidence that the relationship between air pollution in Atlantic City and incidents of arson in New Jersey is not some mere wisp of a correlation, but a bona fide inferno of statistical significance.
In scrutinizing these findings, one cannot help but wonder whether the sooty embrace of Atlantic City's polluted air may indeed fuel the flames of criminal intent in the fertile ground of the Garden State. Our research not only sheds light on this inquiry but also fans the flames of curiosity, encouraging further investigation into the fiery tapestry of environmental influences on criminal behavior.
So, in the immortal words of legendary arson investigator Red Adair, "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional, wait until you hire an amateur." Let this research ignite the professional fervor for understanding the complex interplay of environmental factors and human behavior, and may it serve as a beacon in the smoggy skirmish between science and the fiery intricacies of human conduct.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our scorching investigation into the relationship between air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and arson across the state have ignited a firestorm of inquiry. Our results have not only added fuel to the debate but have also airily supported the literature review's enchanting, almost mystical tales of the connection between environmental conditions and criminal behavior.

The figures from our study breathe life into the often murky and at times comically tangential world of research. Our correlation coefficient of 0.8910710 and p-value of less than 0.01 provide robust evidence that the hazy skies over Atlantic City may indeed have sparked the interests of arsonists across New Jersey. As we recall the whimsical board game dramas of "Flames of Fortune" and "Pollutant Pursuit" from our literature review, it seems that reality has once again topped fiction with its remarkable tales.

Our findings are in line with Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018), who danced around the edges of this smoggy terrain in their studies. Through our research, we have catapulted into uncharted, hazy skies with the vigor of Environmentalist Edna and the discerning eye of Economist Ernest on the true value of sooty indulgences.

The scintillating correlation revealed by our study, as depicted in Figure 1, is akin to the whimsical portrayal in "Smoke and Mirrors," wherein the dancing soot creates a compelling narrative reflective of our findings. It is as if mystery writer Mark's "The Arsonist's Alibi" has come to life before our very eyes, providing a real-world counterpart to the fiery intrigues spun in fiction and board games alike.

As we reflect, our research serves as a torchbearer in the smog of uncertainty, guiding further inquiry into the smoky enigma of air pollution and its potential to stoke the fires of criminal intent. The playful interplay of environmental influences on human behavior and the aura of mystery that surrounds our findings mirror the intricate dance between science and the conundrums of human conduct.

In closing, our research stands as a testament to the adage, "Where there's smoke, there's fire," and calls for future investigations to stoke the flame of understanding in the intersection between environmental factors and criminal behavior. After all, as legendary arson investigator Red Adair once remarked, "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional, wait until you hire an amateur." Let our study serve as a guiding light in the fiery labyrinth of academia and inspire a new wave of inferno-induced inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and Arson in New Jersey. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Soot and the Spontaneous: Air Pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and Arson in New Jersey

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research presents a fiery investigation into the potential relationship between air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and incidents of arson across the state. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our study unfolds a lively correlation coefficient of 0.8910710 and p < 0.01 for the years 1985 to 2022. We breathe life into the debate about whether the hazy skies of Atlantic City may have lit a fire under the perpetrators of arson. Our findings may ignite further inquiry into the smokin' hot topic of environmental influences on criminal behavior.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the grand spectacle of statistical analysis and tongue-in-cheek academic inquiry. We invite you to join us in unraveling the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in the bustling city of Atlantic City, New Jersey, and the fiery occurrences of arson that have ignited headlines across the state.
As the curtain rises on this scintillating paper, we embark on a journey to demystify the potential link between the sooty clouds hovering over Atlantic City and the spontaneous combustion of criminal behavior elsewhere in New Jersey. This is not your average whodunit; no, this is a statistical escapade that sets out to answer the burning question: Does air pollution fan the flames of arson?
With the stage set, our research aims to cast a beacon of statistical certainty onto the murky intersection of environmental conditions and criminal activity. Through sophisticated data analysis and a dash of academic pizzazz, we seek to illuminate the empirical dynamics underpinning this smoldering conundrum.
The stakes are high, the evidence is smokin', and we are poised to explore how the atmospheric peculiarities of Atlantic City may have kindled a fervor for criminal mischief across the state. So, dear audience, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a riveting journey into the heart of statistical mischief and ecological intrigue. The show is about to begin, and the findings are sure to set the academic world ablaze!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation set the stage ablaze, illuminating a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.8910710 between air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and incidents of arson state-wide. This fiery relationship, characterized by an r-squared of 0.7940075, has truly sparked our enthusiasm for exploring the smoggy ambiance of Atlantic City and its potential influence on illicit activities across New Jersey.
The scintillating correlation uncovered in our analysis is depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot that vividly captures the incendiary connection between air pollution and arson. We were struck by the illuminating pattern of this plot, which paints a compelling portrait of the smoky tendrils of pollution reaching out to light the infernos of criminal activity in various parts of the state.
The statistical fireworks continued to dazzle as we examined the p-value, which gleefully danced beneath the fabled threshold of 0.01. This sizzling significance level provided unequivocal evidence that the relationship between air pollution in Atlantic City and incidents of arson in New Jersey is not some mere wisp of a correlation, but a bona fide inferno of statistical significance.
In scrutinizing these findings, one cannot help but wonder whether the sooty embrace of Atlantic City's polluted air may indeed fuel the flames of criminal intent in the fertile ground of the Garden State. Our research not only sheds light on this inquiry but also fans the flames of curiosity, encouraging further investigation into the fiery tapestry of environmental influences on criminal behavior.
So, in the immortal words of legendary arson investigator Red Adair, "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional, wait until you hire an amateur." Let this research ignite the professional fervor for understanding the complex interplay of environmental factors and human behavior, and may it serve as a beacon in the smoggy skirmish between science and the fiery intricacies of human conduct.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our scorching investigation has kindled a fiery understanding of the tantalizing relationship between air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey, and the proclivity for arson across the state. Our findings have fanned the flames of curiosity, igniting a fervent desire for further exploration into the sizzling nexus of environmental conditions and criminal behavior.

As we extinguish the flames of this research, it is clear that the hazy skies of Atlantic City may have indeed lit a fire under the perpetrators of arson elsewhere in New Jersey. The blazing correlation coefficient of 0.8910710 and the irresistibly hot p-value of less than 0.01 have set the stage for a narrative that is anything but a mere smoke and mirrors act.

Our study harnesses the inferno of statistical analysis to breathe life into the debate about whether the cloud of air pollution above Atlantic City has acted as a silent arsonist, setting alight the minds of miscreants across the state. The heat is on, the evidence is smoking, and it is with a fiery fervor that we assert: no more research is needed in this area.

For, as the flames of our investigation slowly die down, it is clear that further scrutiny of this tantalizing relationship would merely be adding fuel to the fire of statistical certainty. This is not some garden-variety correlation; this is a full-blown inferno of empirical evidence that has set the academic world ablaze. Let it be known that our findings have certainly not gone up in smoke - rather, they have shone a spotlight on the smoldering conundrum of environmental influences on criminal behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Soot and the Spontaneous: Air Pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and Arson in New Jersey. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Ecological Anomalies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Soot and the Spontaneous: Air Pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and Arson in New Jersey. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Atmospheric Anomalies and Urban Unicorns


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Soot and the Spontaneous: Air Pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and Arson in New Jersey with an abstract of This research presents a fiery investigation into the potential relationship between air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey and incidents of arson across the state. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our study unfolds a lively correlation coefficient of 0.8910710 and p < 0.01 for the years 1985 to 2022. We breathe life into the debate about whether the hazy skies of Atlantic City may have lit a fire under the perpetrators of arson. Our findings may ignite further inquiry into the smokin' hot topic of environmental influences on criminal behavior.

ChatGPT:

Atlantic City air pollution, New Jersey arson incidents, environmental influence on criminal behavior, correlation between air pollution and arson, Atlantic City pollution data, FBI arson statistics, criminal behavior and environmental factors

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey

Arson in New Jersey
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in New Jersey
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in New Jersey

Correlation r = 0.8910710 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7940075 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 79.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Arson in New Jersey) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey) over the 38 years from 1985 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.6E-14. 0.0000000000000656551369204560
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 6.6E-12% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 15,231,100,670,943 random variables You don't actually need 15 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 37 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 37 because we have two variables measured over a period of 38 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.8, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey (Bad air quality days)13.97269.6418715.697712.95779.329459.6590919.3376.557389.863016.3013710.1379.041112.054813.46159.803923.910617.142869.615395.753421.453495.681823.342623.571431.662051.108032.465751.392762.528090.8333330.2754820.5555560.27472500.2739730.273973000.273973
Arson in New Jersey (Arson rate)38.539.135.134.332.636.935.932.830.832.431.729.930.826.223.122.324.421.518.315.916.117.815.214.112.611.310.39.37.27.46.86.46.54.64.63.92.63.9




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([13.9726,9.64187,15.6977,12.9577,9.32945,9.65909,19.337,6.55738,9.86301,6.30137,10.137,9.0411,12.0548,13.4615,9.80392,3.91061,7.14286,9.61539,5.75342,1.45349,5.68182,3.34262,3.57143,1.66205,1.10803,2.46575,1.39276,2.52809,0.833333,0.275482,0.555556,0.274725,0,0.273973,0.273973,0,0,0.273973,])
array_2 = np.array([38.5,39.1,35.1,34.3,32.6,36.9,35.9,32.8,30.8,32.4,31.7,29.9,30.8,26.2,23.1,22.3,24.4,21.5,18.3,15.9,16.1,17.8,15.2,14.1,12.6,11.3,10.3,9.3,7.2,7.4,6.8,6.4,6.5,4.6,4.6,3.9,2.6,3.9,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey"
array_2_name = "Arson in New Jersey"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 3722 · Black Variable ID: 20296 · Red Variable ID: 20057
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0