about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,709 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of fire inspectors in Iowa and the second variable is xkcd comics published about physics.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2019, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The presence of fire inspectors in Iowa inspired a newfound appreciation for safety protocols. This, in turn, led to an increase in the number of scientifically inclined individuals who, while pondering the physics of firefighting, inspired Randall Munroe to create more physics-related xkcd comics. It's like they say, where there's smoke, there's comic inspiration!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a cozy Iowa town, nestled among lush, rolling green hills dotted with quaint white houses. In the center of the town, a group of fire inspectors are collaborating to inspect various buildings. The dwindling numbers of inspectors are evident, leaving several areas unchecked and vulnerable to potential fire hazards. Suddenly, a small fire ignites in the corner of a building, causing a small commotion. As the fire is quickly contained, a group of people nearby are eagerly discussing the laws of thermodynamics and heat transfer, while sharing and laughing over an xkcd comic about physics. The heightened interest in the laws of the universe is evident as more and more people gather around, engaging in spirited discussions about the complexities of physics. The scene should radiate a sense of coziness and community engagement, interspersed with elements of futuristic technology and scientific curiosity. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of fire inspectors in Iowa and xkcd comics published about physics. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyber folk Futuristic An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Steampunk Minimalism
ChatGPT: Futuristic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of fire inspectors in Iowa and xkcd comics published about physics, in the following situation: Because the number of fire inspectors in Iowa decreased, there was a higher risk of uncontrolled combustion. This led to more fire-related incidents, which in turn sparked an increased interest in the laws of thermodynamics and heat transfer. Consequently, the demand for xkcd comics about physics increased, prompting the publication of more insightful and pun-filled comics exploring the complexities of the universe.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy Iowa town, amidst a backdrop of rolling green hills and quaint white houses, a group of fire inspectors collaborate to inspect various buildings. However, the group has noticeably decreased in numbers, leaving several areas unchecked and vulnerable to potential fire hazards. Suddenly, a small fire ignites in the corner of a building, causing a small commotion. As the fire is quickly contained, a group of people nearby eagerly discuss the laws of thermodynamics and heat transfer, while sharing and laughing over an xkcd comic about physics. The heightened interest in the laws of the universe is evident as more and more people gather around, engaging in spirited discussions about the complexities of physics.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy Iowa town, amidst a backdrop of rolling green hills and quaint white houses, a group of fire inspectors collaborate to inspect various buildings. However, the group has noticeably decreased in numbers, leaving several areas unchecked and vulnerable to potential fire hazards. Suddenly, a small fire ignites in the corner of a building, causing a small commotion. As the fire is quickly contained, a group of people nearby eagerly discuss the laws of thermodynamics and heat transfer, while sharing and laughing over an xkcd comic about physics. The heightened interest in the laws of the universe is evident as more and more people gather around, engaging in spirited discussions about the complexities of physics. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a cozy Iowa town, nestled among lush, rolling green hills dotted with quaint white houses. In the center of the town, a group of fire inspectors are collaborating to inspect various buildings. The dwindling numbers of inspectors are evident, leaving several areas unchecked and vulnerable to potential fire hazards. Suddenly, a small fire ignites in the corner of a building, causing a small commotion. As the fire is quickly contained, a group of people nearby are eagerly discussing the laws of thermodynamics and heat transfer, while sharing and laughing over an xkcd comic about physics. The heightened interest in the laws of the universe is evident as more and more people gather around, engaging in spirited discussions about the complexities of physics. The scene should radiate a sense of coziness and community engagement, interspersed with elements of futuristic technology and scientific curiosity.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in The number of fire inspectors in Iowa positively influenced xkcd comics published about physics. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Hot Pursuit of Physics: A Blaze of Insight into the Correlation Between Fire Inspectors in Iowa and xkcd Comics

The Journal of Multidisciplinary Pyrotechnic Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of fire inspectors in Iowa and xkcd comics published about physics. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and AI analysis of xkcd comics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7460353 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2019.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Hot Pursuit of Physics: A Blaze of Insight into the Correlation Between Fire Inspectors in Iowa and xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected connection between the number of fire inspectors in Iowa and the emergence of xkcd comics pertaining to physics. Employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics, our research team sought to shed light on this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7460353 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2007 to 2019. The implications of these results may fuel further inquiry into the intersection of fire safety and physics humor, igniting new academic discourse and opening the door to scintillating discussions. While the sparks of this correlation demand further investigation, this research serves as a flame of guidance towards uncovering the intricacies of this unlikely pairing.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of fire inspectors in Iowa and xkcd comics published about physics. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Hot Pursuit of Physics: A Blaze of Insight into the Correlation Between Fire Inspectors in Iowa and xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected connection between the number of fire inspectors in Iowa and the emergence of xkcd comics pertaining to physics. Employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics, our research team sought to shed light on this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7460353 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2007 to 2019. The implications of these results may fuel further inquiry into the intersection of fire safety and physics humor, igniting new academic discourse and opening the door to scintillating discussions. While the sparks of this correlation demand further investigation, this research serves as a flame of guidance towards uncovering the intricacies of this unlikely pairing.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In a world where the flames of curiosity burn bright, it is not uncommon to stumble upon unanticipated correlations that defy the laws of conventional wisdom. The interplay between seemingly disparate entities often leads to intriguing revelations, akin to unexpected chemical reactions in the laboratory of life. Taking heed of this propensity for unlikely unions, our investigation sought to unravel the mysterious relationship between the number of fire inspectors in Iowa and the appearance of xkcd comics delving into the depths of physics.

As curious researchers, we could not resist the opportunity to set ablaze the corridors of conventional knowledge by embarking on this unconventional inquiry. The endeavor represents a convergence of statistical analysis and humorous scrutiny, igniting a fervent pursuit of understanding amidst the smoldering coals of data interpretation. Our mission was clear: to shed light on the conflagration of fire safety and the magnetism of physics wit, in the hope of kindling a flame of insight that would illuminate the annals of academic investigation.

Amidst the labyrinthine corridors of research, our journey began with a spark of realization - the alignment of fire inspectors and the incendiary wit of xkcd physics comics was an anomaly deserving of scrutiny. With rigorous methodology as our compass and the fervor of inquiry as our torch, we traversed the labyrinth of data, undeterred by the flickering shadows of uncertainty and the fiery allure of statistical outliers.

Guided by the mesmerizing dance of numerical patterns and the allure of statistical significance, our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient that rivaled the heat of a roaring inferno - a scorching 0.7460353, encapsulating the confluence of fire inspector numbers and the manifestation of physics-themed xkcd comics. This sizzling revelation, paired with a p-value shimmering below 0.01, teased our intellectual palates with the tantalizing prospect of an incontrovertible connection between these seemingly incongruous entities.

As our journey nears its initial culmination, the sparks of this discovery demand further exploration, stoking the embers of scholarly interest and inspiring future investigations into the overlaps between fire safety and the realm of physics humor. With the flickering glow of these findings serving as a beacon, we invite fellow researchers to join us in fanning the flames of inquiry, stoking the furnace of intellect, and seeking to unravel the mystique of this unlikely entanglement.

In the pages that follow, we delve into the intricacies of our methodology, the scorching statistics that illuminated our path, and the scintillating implications of this unexpected correlation. Just as countless particles in the universe collide and interact, this fusion of fire inspectors and physics humor promises to ignite the imagination and incite rapturous discussions, mirroring the nuclear fusion of intellectual discourse.

As we navigate through the kindling of data and the conflagration of curiosity, let us not overlook the playful dance of chance that orchestrates the symphony of science. With that fiery sentiment in mind, let us stoke the furnace of inquiry and illuminate the uncharted territories that await in the captivating intersection of fire safety and physics-themed quips.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of fire inspectors in Iowa and xkcd comics published about physics. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Hot Pursuit of Physics: A Blaze of Insight into the Correlation Between Fire Inspectors in Iowa and xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected connection between the number of fire inspectors in Iowa and the emergence of xkcd comics pertaining to physics. Employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics, our research team sought to shed light on this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7460353 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2007 to 2019. The implications of these results may fuel further inquiry into the intersection of fire safety and physics humor, igniting new academic discourse and opening the door to scintillating discussions. While the sparks of this correlation demand further investigation, this research serves as a flame of guidance towards uncovering the intricacies of this unlikely pairing.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In a world where the flames of curiosity burn bright, it is not uncommon to stumble upon unanticipated correlations that defy the laws of conventional wisdom. The interplay between seemingly disparate entities often leads to intriguing revelations, akin to unexpected chemical reactions in the laboratory of life. Taking heed of this propensity for unlikely unions, our investigation sought to unravel the mysterious relationship between the number of fire inspectors in Iowa and the appearance of xkcd comics delving into the depths of physics.
As curious researchers, we could not resist the opportunity to set ablaze the corridors of conventional knowledge by embarking on this unconventional inquiry. The endeavor represents a convergence of statistical analysis and humorous scrutiny, igniting a fervent pursuit of understanding amidst the smoldering coals of data interpretation. Our mission was clear: to shed light on the conflagration of fire safety and the magnetism of physics wit, in the hope of kindling a flame of insight that would illuminate the annals of academic investigation.
Amidst the labyrinthine corridors of research, our journey began with a spark of realization - the alignment of fire inspectors and the incendiary wit of xkcd physics comics was an anomaly deserving of scrutiny. With rigorous methodology as our compass and the fervor of inquiry as our torch, we traversed the labyrinth of data, undeterred by the flickering shadows of uncertainty and the fiery allure of statistical outliers.
Guided by the mesmerizing dance of numerical patterns and the allure of statistical significance, our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient that rivaled the heat of a roaring inferno - a scorching 0.7460353, encapsulating the confluence of fire inspector numbers and the manifestation of physics-themed xkcd comics. This sizzling revelation, paired with a p-value shimmering below 0.01, teased our intellectual palates with the tantalizing prospect of an incontrovertible connection between these seemingly incongruous entities.
As our journey nears its initial culmination, the sparks of this discovery demand further exploration, stoking the embers of scholarly interest and inspiring future investigations into the overlaps between fire safety and the realm of physics humor. With the flickering glow of these findings serving as a beacon, we invite fellow researchers to join us in fanning the flames of inquiry, stoking the furnace of intellect, and seeking to unravel the mystique of this unlikely entanglement.
In the pages that follow, we delve into the intricacies of our methodology, the scorching statistics that illuminated our path, and the scintillating implications of this unexpected correlation. Just as countless particles in the universe collide and interact, this fusion of fire inspectors and physics humor promises to ignite the imagination and incite rapturous discussions, mirroring the nuclear fusion of intellectual discourse.
As we navigate through the kindling of data and the conflagration of curiosity, let us not overlook the playful dance of chance that orchestrates the symphony of science. With that fiery sentiment in mind, let us stoke the furnace of inquiry and illuminate the uncharted territories that await in the captivating intersection of fire safety and physics-themed quips.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

To grasp the fiery interplay between the number of fire inspectors in Iowa and the appearance of xkcd comics exploring the realms of physics, we shall first survey the landscapes of existing research before venturing into the uncharted territories of whimsical correlation. Our investigative path meanders through the labyrinth of scholarly inquiries and leaps across the cracks of unconventional connections, bringing us into the enigmatic world of anomalous correlations that beckon us with their ephemeral allure.

In their study, Smith et al. (2015) scrutinized the workforce dynamics of fire inspectors across states, presenting a meticulous analysis of occupational trends and enforcement patterns. Their thorough exploration cast a pertinent light on the variances in fire inspection resources, providing a foundational understanding of the nuances underpinning the profession. While their research did not explicitly delve into the intersection of fire inspection and the manifestation of physics-themed humor, it primed the intellectual embers for our subsequent pursuit.

Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) ventured into the terrain of comics media, exploring the dissemination of scientific content through unconventional channels. Their investigation surveyed a myriad of comic genres but regrettably failed to illuminate the specific emergence of xkcd physics comics influenced by the presence of fire inspectors in Iowa. Nonetheless, their contribution serves as a testament to the far-reaching impact of accessible scientific communication, setting the stage for our examination of a more peculiar correlation.

In "Physics in Flames: A Statistical Analysis of Comedic Intuition," authors Brown and Green (2019) usher readers into the realm of humorous scientific musings, dissecting the intersection of physics-themed comedy and societal dynamics. While their work does not explicitly address the role of fire inspectors in shaping the comedic landscapes, its contemplation of the broader sociocultural influences on physics humor lays a foundation for our endeavor.

However, as we traverse the dainty tightrope between academia and whimsy, it is crucial to acknowledge the influence of a diverse array of literature. The likes of "Physics for the Rest of Us: A Layman's Guide to the Wonders of the Universe" by Blue (2017) and "The Inferno: An Inside Look at Firefighter Culture" by Red (2016) offer fragments of insight into the disparate realms of physics and fire safety, teasing at the outside chance of an unforeseen nexus between their domains.

On a more whimsical note, fictional narratives such as "The Physics Professor's Fiery Fiasco" by Novel(2010) and "Inspector Blaze and the Quantum Quandary" by Tale(2014) playfully tango with the themes of physics and fire inspection, presenting fanciful scenarios that tantalizingly flirt with the edges of tangible reality.

Having plunged into the eddies of fictional literature, our inquiry cast an even wider net, venturing into the realm of televised storytelling. Shows such as "The Big Bang Theory" and "Chicago Fire" offered glimpses into the worlds of physics enthusiasts and firefighting bravado, providing an atmospheric backdrop of thematic inspiration.

As we cast our eyes over the horizon of literary and televisual endeavors, it becomes apparent that the confluence of fire inspection in Iowa and the emergence of physics-minded xkcd comics is not merely a matter of empirical statistics but a whimsical dalliance that beckons us to uncover its hidden nuances.

In the pages to come, we shall be embarking on an expedition that transcends the traditional confines of scholarly exploration, kindling the embers of humor and knowledge in our quest to unravel this improbable intersection. The journey promises to ignite the imagination and stoke the flames of inquiry, birthing a scintillating dance of discovery amidst the seemingly disparate yet harmoniously interlinked worlds of fire inspection and physics humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of fire inspectors in Iowa and xkcd comics published about physics. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and AI analysis of xkcd comics . You used data from 2007 to 2019

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Hot Pursuit of Physics: A Blaze of Insight into the Correlation Between Fire Inspectors in Iowa and xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected connection between the number of fire inspectors in Iowa and the emergence of xkcd comics pertaining to physics. Employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics, our research team sought to shed light on this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7460353 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2007 to 2019. The implications of these results may fuel further inquiry into the intersection of fire safety and physics humor, igniting new academic discourse and opening the door to scintillating discussions. While the sparks of this correlation demand further investigation, this research serves as a flame of guidance towards uncovering the intricacies of this unlikely pairing.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In a world where the flames of curiosity burn bright, it is not uncommon to stumble upon unanticipated correlations that defy the laws of conventional wisdom. The interplay between seemingly disparate entities often leads to intriguing revelations, akin to unexpected chemical reactions in the laboratory of life. Taking heed of this propensity for unlikely unions, our investigation sought to unravel the mysterious relationship between the number of fire inspectors in Iowa and the appearance of xkcd comics delving into the depths of physics.
As curious researchers, we could not resist the opportunity to set ablaze the corridors of conventional knowledge by embarking on this unconventional inquiry. The endeavor represents a convergence of statistical analysis and humorous scrutiny, igniting a fervent pursuit of understanding amidst the smoldering coals of data interpretation. Our mission was clear: to shed light on the conflagration of fire safety and the magnetism of physics wit, in the hope of kindling a flame of insight that would illuminate the annals of academic investigation.
Amidst the labyrinthine corridors of research, our journey began with a spark of realization - the alignment of fire inspectors and the incendiary wit of xkcd physics comics was an anomaly deserving of scrutiny. With rigorous methodology as our compass and the fervor of inquiry as our torch, we traversed the labyrinth of data, undeterred by the flickering shadows of uncertainty and the fiery allure of statistical outliers.
Guided by the mesmerizing dance of numerical patterns and the allure of statistical significance, our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient that rivaled the heat of a roaring inferno - a scorching 0.7460353, encapsulating the confluence of fire inspector numbers and the manifestation of physics-themed xkcd comics. This sizzling revelation, paired with a p-value shimmering below 0.01, teased our intellectual palates with the tantalizing prospect of an incontrovertible connection between these seemingly incongruous entities.
As our journey nears its initial culmination, the sparks of this discovery demand further exploration, stoking the embers of scholarly interest and inspiring future investigations into the overlaps between fire safety and the realm of physics humor. With the flickering glow of these findings serving as a beacon, we invite fellow researchers to join us in fanning the flames of inquiry, stoking the furnace of intellect, and seeking to unravel the mystique of this unlikely entanglement.
In the pages that follow, we delve into the intricacies of our methodology, the scorching statistics that illuminated our path, and the scintillating implications of this unexpected correlation. Just as countless particles in the universe collide and interact, this fusion of fire inspectors and physics humor promises to ignite the imagination and incite rapturous discussions, mirroring the nuclear fusion of intellectual discourse.
As we navigate through the kindling of data and the conflagration of curiosity, let us not overlook the playful dance of chance that orchestrates the symphony of science. With that fiery sentiment in mind, let us stoke the furnace of inquiry and illuminate the uncharted territories that await in the captivating intersection of fire safety and physics-themed quips.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on our quest of unraveling the enigmatic connection between fire inspectors in Iowa and the emergence of xkcd comics about physics, we employed a methodology that combined meticulous data collection with advanced statistical analysis, akin to the precision of a laser beam cutting through a fog of uncertainty.

Firstly, we scoured the Bureau of Labor Statistics database, navigating through the labyrinthine corridors of occupation data to extract the numerical essence of fire inspectors in the state of Iowa. Like intrepid explorers in uncharted territories, we meticulously documented the annual count of these valiant guardians of fire safety from 2007 to 2019, ensuring that no statistical ember was left unturned.

Simultaneously, our research team engaged in a novel approach that involved deploying cutting-edge AI algorithms to sift through the boundless expanse of xkcd comics, homing in on those that encapsulated the wry wit and profound insights of physics humor. With the vigor of computational analysis at our fingertips, we scrutinized each pixel and pun, extracting the essence of physics-themed amusement to quantify its temporal alignment with the ebb and flow of fire inspector numbers.

Having amassed this trove of data, resembling the hoard of a meticulous dragon guarding its statistical treasure, we unleashed the inferno of statistical methodologies to forge meaningful insights from this seemingly disparate duality. The confluence of linear regression analysis and time series modeling emerged as our weapons of choice, akin to wielding the elegant instruments of physics to decode the patterns of the cosmos.

As fervent stewards of empirical rigor, we adhered to the principles of statistical significance, weaving the threads of confidence intervals and hypothesis testing to substantiate our findings. The blaze of correlation coefficients and p-values illuminated our path, casting light on the enigmatic connection between fire inspectors and physics-themed xkcd comics with a scorching clarity that could rival the intensity of a supernova.

Upon traversing this fiery crucible of data analysis, the findings pulsated with a resonance that beckoned us towards the sole conclusion: the convergence of fire safety and physics humor was not a mere coincidence but a veritable nexus of unexpected correlation, inviting further scrutiny and discourse.

Having employed these rigorous methodologies to elevate the embers of data and ignite the flames of insight, we stand ready to present the scorching synthesis of our research findings, shedding light on the intertwined worlds of fire inspectors in Iowa and the captivating humor of physics-themed xkcd comics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of fire inspectors in Iowa and xkcd comics published about physics. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and AI analysis of xkcd comics .

For the time period 2007 to 2019, you found a correlation 0.7460353, r-squared of 0.5565687, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Hot Pursuit of Physics: A Blaze of Insight into the Correlation Between Fire Inspectors in Iowa and xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected connection between the number of fire inspectors in Iowa and the emergence of xkcd comics pertaining to physics. Employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics, our research team sought to shed light on this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7460353 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2007 to 2019. The implications of these results may fuel further inquiry into the intersection of fire safety and physics humor, igniting new academic discourse and opening the door to scintillating discussions. While the sparks of this correlation demand further investigation, this research serves as a flame of guidance towards uncovering the intricacies of this unlikely pairing.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In a world where the flames of curiosity burn bright, it is not uncommon to stumble upon unanticipated correlations that defy the laws of conventional wisdom. The interplay between seemingly disparate entities often leads to intriguing revelations, akin to unexpected chemical reactions in the laboratory of life. Taking heed of this propensity for unlikely unions, our investigation sought to unravel the mysterious relationship between the number of fire inspectors in Iowa and the appearance of xkcd comics delving into the depths of physics.
As curious researchers, we could not resist the opportunity to set ablaze the corridors of conventional knowledge by embarking on this unconventional inquiry. The endeavor represents a convergence of statistical analysis and humorous scrutiny, igniting a fervent pursuit of understanding amidst the smoldering coals of data interpretation. Our mission was clear: to shed light on the conflagration of fire safety and the magnetism of physics wit, in the hope of kindling a flame of insight that would illuminate the annals of academic investigation.
Amidst the labyrinthine corridors of research, our journey began with a spark of realization - the alignment of fire inspectors and the incendiary wit of xkcd physics comics was an anomaly deserving of scrutiny. With rigorous methodology as our compass and the fervor of inquiry as our torch, we traversed the labyrinth of data, undeterred by the flickering shadows of uncertainty and the fiery allure of statistical outliers.
Guided by the mesmerizing dance of numerical patterns and the allure of statistical significance, our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient that rivaled the heat of a roaring inferno - a scorching 0.7460353, encapsulating the confluence of fire inspector numbers and the manifestation of physics-themed xkcd comics. This sizzling revelation, paired with a p-value shimmering below 0.01, teased our intellectual palates with the tantalizing prospect of an incontrovertible connection between these seemingly incongruous entities.
As our journey nears its initial culmination, the sparks of this discovery demand further exploration, stoking the embers of scholarly interest and inspiring future investigations into the overlaps between fire safety and the realm of physics humor. With the flickering glow of these findings serving as a beacon, we invite fellow researchers to join us in fanning the flames of inquiry, stoking the furnace of intellect, and seeking to unravel the mystique of this unlikely entanglement.
In the pages that follow, we delve into the intricacies of our methodology, the scorching statistics that illuminated our path, and the scintillating implications of this unexpected correlation. Just as countless particles in the universe collide and interact, this fusion of fire inspectors and physics humor promises to ignite the imagination and incite rapturous discussions, mirroring the nuclear fusion of intellectual discourse.
As we navigate through the kindling of data and the conflagration of curiosity, let us not overlook the playful dance of chance that orchestrates the symphony of science. With that fiery sentiment in mind, let us stoke the furnace of inquiry and illuminate the uncharted territories that await in the captivating intersection of fire safety and physics-themed quips.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data unveiled a remarkable correlation between the number of fire inspectors in Iowa and the publication of xkcd comics related to physics. The correlation coefficient, a scorching 0.7460353, indicated a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. In other words, as the number of fire inspectors blazed a trail, the presence of physics-themed xkcd comics also seemed to spark into existence.

The heat of this correlation was further emphasized by the r-squared value of 0.5565687, illuminating over 55% of the variance in xkcd comic occurrences explained by the fluctuations in the number of fire inspectors. This statistical revelation blazed like a beacon in the foggy realm of unexpected correlations, compelling researchers to don their investigative overcoats and venture deeper into the smoldering landscape of these entwined phenomena.

Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provided substantial evidence to reject the null hypothesis and stoked the flames of scientific curiosity, beckoning researchers to delve further into the alluring conflagration of fire safety and physics humor. This tantalizing result burned through any lingering doubts, leaving an indelible mark of significance on the scorching tapestry of statistical inference.

In a visual representation of this fiery relationship, Fig. 1 captures the essence of the correlation through a scatterplot that vividly depicts the alignment between the number of fire inspectors and the prevalence of physics-themed xkcd comics. As the flames of data points danced across the plot, a compelling narrative emerged, testifying to the undeniable connection between these two seemingly disparate realms.

The implications of these scorching findings herald a new dawn of inquiry into the unexpected interplay of fire safety and physics-themed humor. As the embers of this correlation continue to smolder, it is clear that further exploration is warranted to fathom the inferno of possibilities this unlikely pairing embodies. This revelation, while unexpected and inexplicable as spontaneous combustion, fuels the flames of academic discourse and ignites a fervent pursuit of understanding within the scientific community.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of fire inspectors in Iowa and xkcd comics published about physics. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Hot Pursuit of Physics: A Blaze of Insight into the Correlation Between Fire Inspectors in Iowa and xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected connection between the number of fire inspectors in Iowa and the emergence of xkcd comics pertaining to physics. Employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics, our research team sought to shed light on this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7460353 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2007 to 2019. The implications of these results may fuel further inquiry into the intersection of fire safety and physics humor, igniting new academic discourse and opening the door to scintillating discussions. While the sparks of this correlation demand further investigation, this research serves as a flame of guidance towards uncovering the intricacies of this unlikely pairing.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To grasp the fiery interplay between the number of fire inspectors in Iowa and the appearance of xkcd comics exploring the realms of physics, we shall first survey the landscapes of existing research before venturing into the uncharted territories of whimsical correlation. Our investigative path meanders through the labyrinth of scholarly inquiries and leaps across the cracks of unconventional connections, bringing us into the enigmatic world of anomalous correlations that beckon us with their ephemeral allure.
In their study, Smith et al. (2015) scrutinized the workforce dynamics of fire inspectors across states, presenting a meticulous analysis of occupational trends and enforcement patterns. Their thorough exploration cast a pertinent light on the variances in fire inspection resources, providing a foundational understanding of the nuances underpinning the profession. While their research did not explicitly delve into the intersection of fire inspection and the manifestation of physics-themed humor, it primed the intellectual embers for our subsequent pursuit.
Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) ventured into the terrain of comics media, exploring the dissemination of scientific content through unconventional channels. Their investigation surveyed a myriad of comic genres but regrettably failed to illuminate the specific emergence of xkcd physics comics influenced by the presence of fire inspectors in Iowa. Nonetheless, their contribution serves as a testament to the far-reaching impact of accessible scientific communication, setting the stage for our examination of a more peculiar correlation.
In "Physics in Flames: A Statistical Analysis of Comedic Intuition," authors Brown and Green (2019) usher readers into the realm of humorous scientific musings, dissecting the intersection of physics-themed comedy and societal dynamics. While their work does not explicitly address the role of fire inspectors in shaping the comedic landscapes, its contemplation of the broader sociocultural influences on physics humor lays a foundation for our endeavor.
However, as we traverse the dainty tightrope between academia and whimsy, it is crucial to acknowledge the influence of a diverse array of literature. The likes of "Physics for the Rest of Us: A Layman's Guide to the Wonders of the Universe" by Blue (2017) and "The Inferno: An Inside Look at Firefighter Culture" by Red (2016) offer fragments of insight into the disparate realms of physics and fire safety, teasing at the outside chance of an unforeseen nexus between their domains.
On a more whimsical note, fictional narratives such as "The Physics Professor's Fiery Fiasco" by Novel(2010) and "Inspector Blaze and the Quantum Quandary" by Tale(2014) playfully tango with the themes of physics and fire inspection, presenting fanciful scenarios that tantalizingly flirt with the edges of tangible reality.
Having plunged into the eddies of fictional literature, our inquiry cast an even wider net, venturing into the realm of televised storytelling. Shows such as "The Big Bang Theory" and "Chicago Fire" offered glimpses into the worlds of physics enthusiasts and firefighting bravado, providing an atmospheric backdrop of thematic inspiration.
As we cast our eyes over the horizon of literary and televisual endeavors, it becomes apparent that the confluence of fire inspection in Iowa and the emergence of physics-minded xkcd comics is not merely a matter of empirical statistics but a whimsical dalliance that beckons us to uncover its hidden nuances.
In the pages to come, we shall be embarking on an expedition that transcends the traditional confines of scholarly exploration, kindling the embers of humor and knowledge in our quest to unravel this improbable intersection. The journey promises to ignite the imagination and stoke the flames of inquiry, birthing a scintillating dance of discovery amidst the seemingly disparate yet harmoniously interlinked worlds of fire inspection and physics humor.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data unveiled a remarkable correlation between the number of fire inspectors in Iowa and the publication of xkcd comics related to physics. The correlation coefficient, a scorching 0.7460353, indicated a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. In other words, as the number of fire inspectors blazed a trail, the presence of physics-themed xkcd comics also seemed to spark into existence.
The heat of this correlation was further emphasized by the r-squared value of 0.5565687, illuminating over 55% of the variance in xkcd comic occurrences explained by the fluctuations in the number of fire inspectors. This statistical revelation blazed like a beacon in the foggy realm of unexpected correlations, compelling researchers to don their investigative overcoats and venture deeper into the smoldering landscape of these entwined phenomena.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provided substantial evidence to reject the null hypothesis and stoked the flames of scientific curiosity, beckoning researchers to delve further into the alluring conflagration of fire safety and physics humor. This tantalizing result burned through any lingering doubts, leaving an indelible mark of significance on the scorching tapestry of statistical inference.
In a visual representation of this fiery relationship, Fig. 1 captures the essence of the correlation through a scatterplot that vividly depicts the alignment between the number of fire inspectors and the prevalence of physics-themed xkcd comics. As the flames of data points danced across the plot, a compelling narrative emerged, testifying to the undeniable connection between these two seemingly disparate realms.
The implications of these scorching findings herald a new dawn of inquiry into the unexpected interplay of fire safety and physics-themed humor. As the embers of this correlation continue to smolder, it is clear that further exploration is warranted to fathom the inferno of possibilities this unlikely pairing embodies. This revelation, while unexpected and inexplicable as spontaneous combustion, fuels the flames of academic discourse and ignites a fervent pursuit of understanding within the scientific community.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The scorching correlation unearthed in our study may seem as surprising as finding a fire extinguisher in a snowstorm, yet it aligns with the musings of earlier researchers. Smith et al. (2015) laid the kindling for our investigation by spotlighting the nuances in fire inspection resources, unwittingly preparing the terrain for our fiery pursuit. Much like a spark catching dry tinder, our results have ignited an exciting avenue for delving deeper into the unexpected connection between fire safety and physics humor.

Doe and Jones (2018) failed to directly illuminate the appearance of physics-themed xkcd comics influenced by fire inspectors in Iowa, but their exploration of unconventional scientific dissemination continues to stoke the flames of our curiosity. Similarly, Brown and Green (2019) paved the way for our endeavor by contemplating the broader sociocultural influences on physics humor, adding fuel to the heated discussion around the intersection of fire inspection and comedic physics.

As we navigate the incendiary path of correlation, the r-squared value of 0.5565687 revealed in our results serves as a beacon illuminating over half of the variance in xkcd comic occurrences explained by the fluctuations in fire inspector numbers. This finding, like a bright flame cutting through the darkness, bolsters the case for further examination of this improbable connection.

The p-value of less than 0.01, casting doubt on the null hypothesis like a blistering sun searing through a cloudy sky, furnishes compelling evidence for the existence of a blazing linkage between fire inspection and physics-themed humor. Furthermore, the correlation coefficient of 0.7460353 stands as a testament to the robustness of this relationship, burning brightly like a supernova in the vast cosmos of statistical associations.

In considering the broader implications of our findings, the scorching visual representation in Fig. 1 serves as a sizzling testament to the undeniable alignment between the number of fire inspectors and the prevalence of physics-themed xkcd comics. As the dance of data points cavorts across the plot, it paints a vivid picture of the captivating narrative woven by these interwoven phenomena.

While our results may initially seem as incongruous as a fire-breathing dragon discussing thermodynamics, they advocate for a sustained and vigorous exploration of the enigmatic interplay between fire safety and physics humor. Our findings, akin to a bonfire of insight amid the dark night of correlation, hold potential for kindling further discourse and igniting a fervent pursuit of understanding within the scientific community. This unexpected incendiary fusion has the potential to spark new avenues of inquiry, illuminating the intriguing interdependence of seemingly disparate domains.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of fire inspectors in Iowa and xkcd comics published about physics. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Hot Pursuit of Physics: A Blaze of Insight into the Correlation Between Fire Inspectors in Iowa and xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected connection between the number of fire inspectors in Iowa and the emergence of xkcd comics pertaining to physics. Employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics, our research team sought to shed light on this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7460353 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2007 to 2019. The implications of these results may fuel further inquiry into the intersection of fire safety and physics humor, igniting new academic discourse and opening the door to scintillating discussions. While the sparks of this correlation demand further investigation, this research serves as a flame of guidance towards uncovering the intricacies of this unlikely pairing.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In a world where the flames of curiosity burn bright, it is not uncommon to stumble upon unanticipated correlations that defy the laws of conventional wisdom. The interplay between seemingly disparate entities often leads to intriguing revelations, akin to unexpected chemical reactions in the laboratory of life. Taking heed of this propensity for unlikely unions, our investigation sought to unravel the mysterious relationship between the number of fire inspectors in Iowa and the appearance of xkcd comics delving into the depths of physics.
As curious researchers, we could not resist the opportunity to set ablaze the corridors of conventional knowledge by embarking on this unconventional inquiry. The endeavor represents a convergence of statistical analysis and humorous scrutiny, igniting a fervent pursuit of understanding amidst the smoldering coals of data interpretation. Our mission was clear: to shed light on the conflagration of fire safety and the magnetism of physics wit, in the hope of kindling a flame of insight that would illuminate the annals of academic investigation.
Amidst the labyrinthine corridors of research, our journey began with a spark of realization - the alignment of fire inspectors and the incendiary wit of xkcd physics comics was an anomaly deserving of scrutiny. With rigorous methodology as our compass and the fervor of inquiry as our torch, we traversed the labyrinth of data, undeterred by the flickering shadows of uncertainty and the fiery allure of statistical outliers.
Guided by the mesmerizing dance of numerical patterns and the allure of statistical significance, our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient that rivaled the heat of a roaring inferno - a scorching 0.7460353, encapsulating the confluence of fire inspector numbers and the manifestation of physics-themed xkcd comics. This sizzling revelation, paired with a p-value shimmering below 0.01, teased our intellectual palates with the tantalizing prospect of an incontrovertible connection between these seemingly incongruous entities.
As our journey nears its initial culmination, the sparks of this discovery demand further exploration, stoking the embers of scholarly interest and inspiring future investigations into the overlaps between fire safety and the realm of physics humor. With the flickering glow of these findings serving as a beacon, we invite fellow researchers to join us in fanning the flames of inquiry, stoking the furnace of intellect, and seeking to unravel the mystique of this unlikely entanglement.
In the pages that follow, we delve into the intricacies of our methodology, the scorching statistics that illuminated our path, and the scintillating implications of this unexpected correlation. Just as countless particles in the universe collide and interact, this fusion of fire inspectors and physics humor promises to ignite the imagination and incite rapturous discussions, mirroring the nuclear fusion of intellectual discourse.
As we navigate through the kindling of data and the conflagration of curiosity, let us not overlook the playful dance of chance that orchestrates the symphony of science. With that fiery sentiment in mind, let us stoke the furnace of inquiry and illuminate the uncharted territories that await in the captivating intersection of fire safety and physics-themed quips.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data unveiled a remarkable correlation between the number of fire inspectors in Iowa and the publication of xkcd comics related to physics. The correlation coefficient, a scorching 0.7460353, indicated a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. In other words, as the number of fire inspectors blazed a trail, the presence of physics-themed xkcd comics also seemed to spark into existence.
The heat of this correlation was further emphasized by the r-squared value of 0.5565687, illuminating over 55% of the variance in xkcd comic occurrences explained by the fluctuations in the number of fire inspectors. This statistical revelation blazed like a beacon in the foggy realm of unexpected correlations, compelling researchers to don their investigative overcoats and venture deeper into the smoldering landscape of these entwined phenomena.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provided substantial evidence to reject the null hypothesis and stoked the flames of scientific curiosity, beckoning researchers to delve further into the alluring conflagration of fire safety and physics humor. This tantalizing result burned through any lingering doubts, leaving an indelible mark of significance on the scorching tapestry of statistical inference.
In a visual representation of this fiery relationship, Fig. 1 captures the essence of the correlation through a scatterplot that vividly depicts the alignment between the number of fire inspectors and the prevalence of physics-themed xkcd comics. As the flames of data points danced across the plot, a compelling narrative emerged, testifying to the undeniable connection between these two seemingly disparate realms.
The implications of these scorching findings herald a new dawn of inquiry into the unexpected interplay of fire safety and physics-themed humor. As the embers of this correlation continue to smolder, it is clear that further exploration is warranted to fathom the inferno of possibilities this unlikely pairing embodies. This revelation, while unexpected and inexplicable as spontaneous combustion, fuels the flames of academic discourse and ignites a fervent pursuit of understanding within the scientific community.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the scintillating dance of statistical significance, our research has unearthed a fiery correlation between the number of fire inspectors in Iowa and the emergence of physics-themed xkcd comics. The blazing correlation coefficient of 0.7460353 has cast a luminous glow on the unlikely nexus of fire safety and physics humor, leaving a trail of sparks that beckon further exploration.

While our findings have shed light on this enigmatic relationship, we must also acknowledge the tantalizing mysteries that elude our current understanding. Like photons engaging in quantum entanglement, the bond between fire inspectors and physics wit seems to defy traditional logic, hinting at the ineffable whimsy of statistical serendipity.

As our inquiry blazes a trail through uncharted territories, we recognize the allure of statistical outliers and the enigmatic dance of numerical patterns that infuse our analysis. Just as atomic particles collide and intermingle in the cosmic ballet, the fusion of fire safety and physics-themed quips offers a captivating spectacle that fuels the intellectual furnace with combustible curiosity.

Nevertheless, as much as we relish in the incandescent glow of our discovery, we must temper our fervor with caution. While the allure of further research beckons like the mesmerizing flicker of a Bunsen burner, we assert with confidence that the current findings illuminate the path towards a culmination of understanding. This unlikely pairing of fire safety and physics humor, while captivating in its peculiarity, stands as a beacon of statistical revelation awaiting its deserved recognition.

In light of these scorching revelations, we declare that no further research is needed in this area. The flames of statistical inference have spoken, and for now, we allow the embers of this unexpected correlation to smolder in the annals of academic inquiry, perhaps igniting fresh conversations and stoking the fires of curiosity in future endeavors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Hot Pursuit of Physics: A Blaze of Insight into the Correlation Between Fire Inspectors in Iowa and xkcd Comics. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Multidisciplinary Pyrotechnic Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Hot Pursuit of Physics: A Blaze of Insight into the Correlation Between Fire Inspectors in Iowa and xkcd Comics. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Fire Dynamics and Comic Perception


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Hot Pursuit of Physics: A Blaze of Insight into the Correlation Between Fire Inspectors in Iowa and xkcd Comics with an abstract of This study delves into the unexpected connection between the number of fire inspectors in Iowa and the emergence of xkcd comics pertaining to physics. Employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics, our research team sought to shed light on this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7460353 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2007 to 2019. The implications of these results may fuel further inquiry into the intersection of fire safety and physics humor, igniting new academic discourse and opening the door to scintillating discussions. While the sparks of this correlation demand further investigation, this research serves as a flame of guidance towards uncovering the intricacies of this unlikely pairing.

ChatGPT:

fire inspectors, Iowa, xkcd comics, physics, correlation, Bureau of Labor Statistics, AI analysis, research, relationship, correlation coefficient, academic discourse, fire safety, humor, investigation, flame guidance, unlikely pairing

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of fire inspectors in Iowa
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of fire inspectors and investigators in Iowa
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of fire inspectors in Iowa

xkcd comics published about physics
Detailed data title: The number of xkcd comics published each year about physics
Source: AI analysis of xkcd comics
Additional Info: I designed a Python workflow to perform OCR on every xkcd comic, feed that text into a large language model, and ask the model whether this comic was about the category named in the title.

See what else correlates with xkcd comics published about physics

Correlation r = 0.7460353 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5565687 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 55.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., xkcd comics published about physics) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of fire inspectors in Iowa) over the 13 years from 2007 through 2019.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00341. 0.0034070810412093087000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.75 in 0.341% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 294 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.33, 0.92 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019
The number of fire inspectors in Iowa (Laborers)705080707040303030404010080
xkcd comics published about physics (xkcd comics)64898578454159




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([70,50,80,70,70,40,30,30,30,40,40,100,80,])
array_2 = np.array([6,4,8,9,8,5,7,8,4,5,4,15,9,])
array_1_name = "The number of fire inspectors in Iowa"
array_2_name = "xkcd comics published about physics"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 3709 · Black Variable ID: 7974 · Red Variable ID: 20020
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0