about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,665 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn and the second variable is Google searches for 'i cant even'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The genetically modified corn was releasing pheromones that accidentally mimicked teenage angst, leading to a nationwide 'what is life even' crisis.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a glitch-inspired interpretation of a sun-drenched cornfield, with rows of towering GMO corn stretching into the distance. The colors should be distorted and surreal, and the shapes should be shifting and fragmented. In the foreground, depict a group of people with wide-eyed amazement, holding smartphones up to capture the surreal sight. The image should evoke a sense of disbelief and wonder as the onlookers struggle to comprehend the unbelievable capabilities of the genetically modified corn. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute 2D animation 3D Pixar Style Macabre Magic realism Glitch art
ChatGPT: Glitch art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn and Google searches for 'i cant even', in the following situation: Because GMO corn is so impressive, it's made people say "I can't even" in awe of its genetically modified magnificence. The corn's ability to withstand pests and yield bountiful harvests has left folks in a state of utter disbelief. As more GMO corn hits the market, the 'i cant even' searches skyrocket as people struggle to comprehend the corn-troversy. It's a-maize-ing how this correlation corn-firms the power of genetically modified crops to leave us speechless!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sun-drenched cornfield, rows of towering GMO corn stretch into the distance. Each stalk stands tall and healthy, impervious to insects and disease. In the foreground, a group of people stand with wide-eyed amazement, murmuring "I can't even" as they gaze in disbelief at the remarkable sight. Their smartphones are out, and the screen shows a sharp spike in Google searches for "i cant even," as more and more people struggle to comprehend the unbelievable capabilities of the genetically modified corn.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Glitch art ] and depicting this scene: In a sun-drenched cornfield, rows of towering GMO corn stretch into the distance. Each stalk stands tall and healthy, impervious to insects and disease. In the foreground, a group of people stand with wide-eyed amazement, murmuring "I can't even" as they gaze in disbelief at the remarkable sight. Their smartphones are out, and the screen shows a sharp spike in Google searches for "i cant even," as more and more people struggle to comprehend the unbelievable capabilities of the genetically modified corn. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a glitch-inspired interpretation of a sun-drenched cornfield, with rows of towering GMO corn stretching into the distance. The colors should be distorted and surreal, and the shapes should be shifting and fragmented. In the foreground, depict a group of people with wide-eyed amazement, holding smartphones up to capture the surreal sight. The image should evoke a sense of disbelief and wonder as the onlookers struggle to comprehend the unbelievable capabilities of the genetically modified corn.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn caused i cant even (Google searches for 'i cant even') to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
GMO Corn and 'I Can't Even': A Kernel of Truth?

The Journal of Agricultural Absurdities

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9140529 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"GMO Corn and 'I Can't Even': A Kernel of Truth?"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the uncharted territory of genetically modified (GMO) corn and its potential impact on the perplexing phenomenon of people searching "i cant even" on Google. By examining USDA data on GMO corn cultivation and harnessing the power of Google Trends, we sought to shed light on this seemingly unlikely connection. Our findings revealed a strong positive correlation between the use of GMO corn and the frequency of Google searches for "i cant even," with a correlation coefficient of 0.9140529 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2023.

Our results suggest that the proliferation of GMO corn cultivation may indeed be linked to the surge in expressions of exasperation and disbelief epitomized by the phrase "i cant even." While the exact mechanisms underlying this correlation remain enigmatic, it is clear that a husk-y relationship exists between GMO corn and the exasperated utterances of internet users. It seems that this connection is not just corny—*cornet* be explained by mere coincidence. Our study opens new avenues for research, encouraging further exploration into the intersection of agricultural practices and digital expressions of frustration.

As we navigate through this research, one thing is abundantly clear: when it comes to understanding the impact of GMO corn on human behavior, we should approach it with a *kernal* of humor and a willingness to *cob*ble together unexpected findings. After all, what's research without a few *ear-resistible* puns along the way?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"GMO Corn and 'I Can't Even': A Kernel of Truth?"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the uncharted territory of genetically modified (GMO) corn and its potential impact on the perplexing phenomenon of people searching "i cant even" on Google. By examining USDA data on GMO corn cultivation and harnessing the power of Google Trends, we sought to shed light on this seemingly unlikely connection. Our findings revealed a strong positive correlation between the use of GMO corn and the frequency of Google searches for "i cant even," with a correlation coefficient of 0.9140529 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2023.

Our results suggest that the proliferation of GMO corn cultivation may indeed be linked to the surge in expressions of exasperation and disbelief epitomized by the phrase "i cant even." While the exact mechanisms underlying this correlation remain enigmatic, it is clear that a husk-y relationship exists between GMO corn and the exasperated utterances of internet users. It seems that this connection is not just corny—*cornet* be explained by mere coincidence. Our study opens new avenues for research, encouraging further exploration into the intersection of agricultural practices and digital expressions of frustration.

As we navigate through this research, one thing is abundantly clear: when it comes to understanding the impact of GMO corn on human behavior, we should approach it with a *kernal* of humor and a willingness to *cob*ble together unexpected findings. After all, what's research without a few *ear-resistible* puns along the way?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Grains and groans, fellow scholars! Today, we embark on a corny quest that blends the fields of agricultural science and internet linguistics in an attempt to unravel the tangled web of GMO corn and the enigmatic phrase "i cant even." It's a-maize-ing how we stumbled upon this peculiar connection, but as scholars, we must embrace it with ears wide open and a hearty appetite for discovery.

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have long been a hot topic in scientific discourse, often stirring as much controversy as a pot of boiling corn. However, amidst the heated debates and husky skepticism, an unlikely and amusing correlation caught our attention—the apparent coupling of GMO corn and the exasperated online expression "i cant even." Now, if you'll allow me to *stalk* about this, I promise to keep the puns *ear-responsible*.

To *ketchup* with you, our study set out to plant the seeds of inquiry into this unexplored territory, drawing on USDA data on GMO corn cultivation as the *stalk* of our analysis. Pairing this harvest with the fruitful insights gleaned from Google Trends, we *corn-piled* a dataset that could shed light on the purported link between agriculture and modern expressions of exasperation.

It's no coincidence that our findings sprouted a statistically significant correlation between the use of GMO corn and the frequency of "i cant even" searches. The correlation coefficient of 0.9140529 is *ear-resistibly* high, leaving us to *maize* over the implications of this unlikely relationship. As the data unfolds, it's clear that the potential impact of GMO corn cultivation on the digital landscape goes beyond just *stalk* increases and *kernels* of truth – it's a-maize-ing how intertwined these elements truly are.

So, as we wade through the brambles of data and navigate the rows of statistical analyses, let's not forget to embrace the humor in unraveling this *corn-plicated* mystery. After all, when the going gets tough, what better way to *butter* us up than with a few witty puns and a *flourish* of levity? Let's shuck off any preconceived notions and *corn-fidently* dive into this *kernel* of truth with a good laugh and a sturdy sense of curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"GMO Corn and 'I Can't Even': A Kernel of Truth?"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the uncharted territory of genetically modified (GMO) corn and its potential impact on the perplexing phenomenon of people searching "i cant even" on Google. By examining USDA data on GMO corn cultivation and harnessing the power of Google Trends, we sought to shed light on this seemingly unlikely connection. Our findings revealed a strong positive correlation between the use of GMO corn and the frequency of Google searches for "i cant even," with a correlation coefficient of 0.9140529 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2023.

Our results suggest that the proliferation of GMO corn cultivation may indeed be linked to the surge in expressions of exasperation and disbelief epitomized by the phrase "i cant even." While the exact mechanisms underlying this correlation remain enigmatic, it is clear that a husk-y relationship exists between GMO corn and the exasperated utterances of internet users. It seems that this connection is not just corny—*cornet* be explained by mere coincidence. Our study opens new avenues for research, encouraging further exploration into the intersection of agricultural practices and digital expressions of frustration.

As we navigate through this research, one thing is abundantly clear: when it comes to understanding the impact of GMO corn on human behavior, we should approach it with a *kernal* of humor and a willingness to *cob*ble together unexpected findings. After all, what's research without a few *ear-resistible* puns along the way?

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Grains and groans, fellow scholars! Today, we embark on a corny quest that blends the fields of agricultural science and internet linguistics in an attempt to unravel the tangled web of GMO corn and the enigmatic phrase "i cant even." It's a-maize-ing how we stumbled upon this peculiar connection, but as scholars, we must embrace it with ears wide open and a hearty appetite for discovery.
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have long been a hot topic in scientific discourse, often stirring as much controversy as a pot of boiling corn. However, amidst the heated debates and husky skepticism, an unlikely and amusing correlation caught our attention—the apparent coupling of GMO corn and the exasperated online expression "i cant even." Now, if you'll allow me to *stalk* about this, I promise to keep the puns *ear-responsible*.
To *ketchup* with you, our study set out to plant the seeds of inquiry into this unexplored territory, drawing on USDA data on GMO corn cultivation as the *stalk* of our analysis. Pairing this harvest with the fruitful insights gleaned from Google Trends, we *corn-piled* a dataset that could shed light on the purported link between agriculture and modern expressions of exasperation.
It's no coincidence that our findings sprouted a statistically significant correlation between the use of GMO corn and the frequency of "i cant even" searches. The correlation coefficient of 0.9140529 is *ear-resistibly* high, leaving us to *maize* over the implications of this unlikely relationship. As the data unfolds, it's clear that the potential impact of GMO corn cultivation on the digital landscape goes beyond just *stalk* increases and *kernels* of truth – it's a-maize-ing how intertwined these elements truly are.
So, as we wade through the brambles of data and navigate the rows of statistical analyses, let's not forget to embrace the humor in unraveling this *corn-plicated* mystery. After all, when the going gets tough, what better way to *butter* us up than with a few witty puns and a *flourish* of levity? Let's shuck off any preconceived notions and *corn-fidently* dive into this *kernel* of truth with a good laugh and a sturdy sense of curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature surrounding the enigmatic relationship between GMO corn and the popular phrase "i cant even" has been scarce but not entirely barren. Smith and Doe (2018) investigated the impact of GMO corn cultivation on social media expressions and found a suggestive association between the two. Similarly, Jones et al. (2020) dabbled in the realm of digital language trends and hinted at a potential connection between agricultural practices and online vernacular.

Venturing beyond the confines of scientific journals, even non-fiction works have offered intriguing perspectives on the intertwining of agriculture and modern digital expressions. In "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan, the echoes of humanity's relationship with food and technology reverberate in a manner that seems eerily relevant to our current exploration. Furthermore, "The Fate of Food" by Amanda Little delves into the intersection of farming and technology, subtly hinting at the potential ramifications of GMOs on human behavior.

As we traverse the realms of fiction, works like "The Children of the Corn" by Stephen King and "Silent Spring" by Rachel Carson add a dash of speculative flavor to our understanding of GMO corn's potential effects on human psychology. The way in which these authors weave tales of agricultural intrigue and ecological mystery seems to echo the very perplexities we encounter in our investigation.
It is important to note that our literature review was not restricted to traditional scholarly sources. In our pursuit of comprehensive understanding, we turned over every proverbial cob in search of insight. Some may consider it unorthodox, but we stand by the enlightening and, frankly, *corn-fusing* knowledge we gleaned from the backs of various shampoo bottles. The cryptic ingredients and tantalizing promises only served to enhance our understanding of the enigmatic connections we investigate.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"GMO Corn and 'I Can't Even': A Kernel of Truth?"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the uncharted territory of genetically modified (GMO) corn and its potential impact on the perplexing phenomenon of people searching "i cant even" on Google. By examining USDA data on GMO corn cultivation and harnessing the power of Google Trends, we sought to shed light on this seemingly unlikely connection. Our findings revealed a strong positive correlation between the use of GMO corn and the frequency of Google searches for "i cant even," with a correlation coefficient of 0.9140529 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2023.

Our results suggest that the proliferation of GMO corn cultivation may indeed be linked to the surge in expressions of exasperation and disbelief epitomized by the phrase "i cant even." While the exact mechanisms underlying this correlation remain enigmatic, it is clear that a husk-y relationship exists between GMO corn and the exasperated utterances of internet users. It seems that this connection is not just corny—*cornet* be explained by mere coincidence. Our study opens new avenues for research, encouraging further exploration into the intersection of agricultural practices and digital expressions of frustration.

As we navigate through this research, one thing is abundantly clear: when it comes to understanding the impact of GMO corn on human behavior, we should approach it with a *kernal* of humor and a willingness to *cob*ble together unexpected findings. After all, what's research without a few *ear-resistible* puns along the way?

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Grains and groans, fellow scholars! Today, we embark on a corny quest that blends the fields of agricultural science and internet linguistics in an attempt to unravel the tangled web of GMO corn and the enigmatic phrase "i cant even." It's a-maize-ing how we stumbled upon this peculiar connection, but as scholars, we must embrace it with ears wide open and a hearty appetite for discovery.
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have long been a hot topic in scientific discourse, often stirring as much controversy as a pot of boiling corn. However, amidst the heated debates and husky skepticism, an unlikely and amusing correlation caught our attention—the apparent coupling of GMO corn and the exasperated online expression "i cant even." Now, if you'll allow me to *stalk* about this, I promise to keep the puns *ear-responsible*.
To *ketchup* with you, our study set out to plant the seeds of inquiry into this unexplored territory, drawing on USDA data on GMO corn cultivation as the *stalk* of our analysis. Pairing this harvest with the fruitful insights gleaned from Google Trends, we *corn-piled* a dataset that could shed light on the purported link between agriculture and modern expressions of exasperation.
It's no coincidence that our findings sprouted a statistically significant correlation between the use of GMO corn and the frequency of "i cant even" searches. The correlation coefficient of 0.9140529 is *ear-resistibly* high, leaving us to *maize* over the implications of this unlikely relationship. As the data unfolds, it's clear that the potential impact of GMO corn cultivation on the digital landscape goes beyond just *stalk* increases and *kernels* of truth – it's a-maize-ing how intertwined these elements truly are.
So, as we wade through the brambles of data and navigate the rows of statistical analyses, let's not forget to embrace the humor in unraveling this *corn-plicated* mystery. After all, when the going gets tough, what better way to *butter* us up than with a few witty puns and a *flourish* of levity? Let's shuck off any preconceived notions and *corn-fidently* dive into this *kernel* of truth with a good laugh and a sturdy sense of curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

Ah, buckle up, fellow enthusiasts of the scientific and the silly, for we're about to dive into the methodology section that guided our quirky voyage through the cornfields of data and digital drollery. Our research methods might have been as convoluted as a corn maze, but fear not, for in this section, we shall unravel the intricate web of statistical analyses and dig into the nitty-gritty of data collection.

To commission our study, we first harvested a bounty of data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) on genetically modified (GMO) corn cultivation. Our noble quest then led us to the fertile pastures of Google Trends, where we cultivated a crop of search trend data related to the phrase "i cant even" from 2004 to 2023. It was like going on a treasure hunt, except the treasure turned out to be statistical correlations and dad jokes.

Now, as we *maize* our way through the rocky terrain of statistical analyses, we employed the formidable Pearson correlation coefficient to quantify the relationship between GMO corn use and 'i cant even' searches. It was like the corn syrup that binds the pancake batter of our findings together - sweet, sticky, and essential. We also gallantly trudged through the thickets of hypothesis testing, wielding the mighty p-value like a statistical sword to discern whether our findings were mere coincidence or something *corn-crete*.

Since we are in the business of unraveling scientific mysteries and slaying statistical dragons, we utilized a multiplicative time-series model to account for the temporal patterns of GMO corn cultivation and 'i cant even' searches. Like a clockwork maze, this model helped us navigate through the twists and turns of time, ensuring our findings weren't merely a kernel of truth, but a *cob-nfirmed* phenomenon.

As with any rigorous scientific inquiry, we double-checked our findings using robustness checks, sensitivity analyses, and cross-validation techniques. It was like building a fortress around our results, protecting them from the *stalkers* of doubt and the *kernel* of statistical uncertainty.

Lastly, as our brave expedition came to a close, we handled the heaps of data with care, implementing sophisticated statistical software and programming languages to wrangle, analyze, and visualize the cornucopia of information at our disposal. It was as if we were the alchemists of data, turning the raw ears of numbers into golden insights with a sprinkle of statistical magic.

So, as we escape the labyrinth of data and bow out of this zany ride through the cornfields of methodology, let us remember that even the most rigorous of scientific pursuits can benefit from a dash of humor and a sprinkle of curiosity. After all, what's research without a few puns to *ketchup* the reader's attention and instill a sense of wonder?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9140529, r-squared of 0.8354927, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"GMO Corn and 'I Can't Even': A Kernel of Truth?"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the uncharted territory of genetically modified (GMO) corn and its potential impact on the perplexing phenomenon of people searching "i cant even" on Google. By examining USDA data on GMO corn cultivation and harnessing the power of Google Trends, we sought to shed light on this seemingly unlikely connection. Our findings revealed a strong positive correlation between the use of GMO corn and the frequency of Google searches for "i cant even," with a correlation coefficient of 0.9140529 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2023.

Our results suggest that the proliferation of GMO corn cultivation may indeed be linked to the surge in expressions of exasperation and disbelief epitomized by the phrase "i cant even." While the exact mechanisms underlying this correlation remain enigmatic, it is clear that a husk-y relationship exists between GMO corn and the exasperated utterances of internet users. It seems that this connection is not just corny—*cornet* be explained by mere coincidence. Our study opens new avenues for research, encouraging further exploration into the intersection of agricultural practices and digital expressions of frustration.

As we navigate through this research, one thing is abundantly clear: when it comes to understanding the impact of GMO corn on human behavior, we should approach it with a *kernal* of humor and a willingness to *cob*ble together unexpected findings. After all, what's research without a few *ear-resistible* puns along the way?

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Grains and groans, fellow scholars! Today, we embark on a corny quest that blends the fields of agricultural science and internet linguistics in an attempt to unravel the tangled web of GMO corn and the enigmatic phrase "i cant even." It's a-maize-ing how we stumbled upon this peculiar connection, but as scholars, we must embrace it with ears wide open and a hearty appetite for discovery.
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have long been a hot topic in scientific discourse, often stirring as much controversy as a pot of boiling corn. However, amidst the heated debates and husky skepticism, an unlikely and amusing correlation caught our attention—the apparent coupling of GMO corn and the exasperated online expression "i cant even." Now, if you'll allow me to *stalk* about this, I promise to keep the puns *ear-responsible*.
To *ketchup* with you, our study set out to plant the seeds of inquiry into this unexplored territory, drawing on USDA data on GMO corn cultivation as the *stalk* of our analysis. Pairing this harvest with the fruitful insights gleaned from Google Trends, we *corn-piled* a dataset that could shed light on the purported link between agriculture and modern expressions of exasperation.
It's no coincidence that our findings sprouted a statistically significant correlation between the use of GMO corn and the frequency of "i cant even" searches. The correlation coefficient of 0.9140529 is *ear-resistibly* high, leaving us to *maize* over the implications of this unlikely relationship. As the data unfolds, it's clear that the potential impact of GMO corn cultivation on the digital landscape goes beyond just *stalk* increases and *kernels* of truth – it's a-maize-ing how intertwined these elements truly are.
So, as we wade through the brambles of data and navigate the rows of statistical analyses, let's not forget to embrace the humor in unraveling this *corn-plicated* mystery. After all, when the going gets tough, what better way to *butter* us up than with a few witty puns and a *flourish* of levity? Let's shuck off any preconceived notions and *corn-fidently* dive into this *kernel* of truth with a good laugh and a sturdy sense of curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation into the relationship between GMO corn cultivation and Google searches for "i cant even" has yielded results that are as surprising as they are chuckle-inducing. The correlation between these seemingly disparate variables turned out to be a-**maize**-ingly strong, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9140529. This implies a robust positive association between the use of GMO corn and the frequency of searches for "i cant even" over the period from 2004 to 2023. It seems that this correlation husk be taken lightly.

The r-squared value of 0.8354927 further emphasizes the substantial connection between GMO corn and the exasperated phrase "i cant even," indicating that approximately 83.5% of the variability in "i cant even" searches can be explained by changes in GMO corn cultivation. It's obvious that the impact of GMO corn extends beyond agriculture to influence our digital expressions of frustration. It's a-maize-ing how these seemingly unrelated variables harmonize!

Moreover, the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 corroborates the validity of our findings, indicating that the observed correlation is not merely a figment of statistical coincidence. It's clear that this corn-y connection between GMO corn and "i cant even" searches warrants further investigation and raises intriguing questions about the intersection of agricultural practices and digital behavior.

These findings are succinctly encapsulated in Figure 1, showing a compelling scatterplot that visually confirms the potent positive relationship between GMO corn cultivation and Google searches for "i cant even". The data points are tightly clustered along the upward trend line, illustrating the strong association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that when it comes to GMO corn and internet exasperation, the correlation certainly *ears* its place in the academic spotlight.

As we ponder over these unexpected results, we must not forget to approach this research with a sense of humor and a willingness to embrace the kernel of truth behind this peculiar correlation. After all, sometimes the most fruitful discoveries emerge from the unlikeliest of pairings - just like a-maize-ing corn and the exasperated exclamations of "i cant even." This unlikely relationship surely deserves to be *ear-marked* for further exploration in both academic and comedic circles!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"GMO Corn and 'I Can't Even': A Kernel of Truth?"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the uncharted territory of genetically modified (GMO) corn and its potential impact on the perplexing phenomenon of people searching "i cant even" on Google. By examining USDA data on GMO corn cultivation and harnessing the power of Google Trends, we sought to shed light on this seemingly unlikely connection. Our findings revealed a strong positive correlation between the use of GMO corn and the frequency of Google searches for "i cant even," with a correlation coefficient of 0.9140529 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2023.

Our results suggest that the proliferation of GMO corn cultivation may indeed be linked to the surge in expressions of exasperation and disbelief epitomized by the phrase "i cant even." While the exact mechanisms underlying this correlation remain enigmatic, it is clear that a husk-y relationship exists between GMO corn and the exasperated utterances of internet users. It seems that this connection is not just corny—*cornet* be explained by mere coincidence. Our study opens new avenues for research, encouraging further exploration into the intersection of agricultural practices and digital expressions of frustration.

As we navigate through this research, one thing is abundantly clear: when it comes to understanding the impact of GMO corn on human behavior, we should approach it with a *kernal* of humor and a willingness to *cob*ble together unexpected findings. After all, what's research without a few *ear-resistible* puns along the way?

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature surrounding the enigmatic relationship between GMO corn and the popular phrase "i cant even" has been scarce but not entirely barren. Smith and Doe (2018) investigated the impact of GMO corn cultivation on social media expressions and found a suggestive association between the two. Similarly, Jones et al. (2020) dabbled in the realm of digital language trends and hinted at a potential connection between agricultural practices and online vernacular.
Venturing beyond the confines of scientific journals, even non-fiction works have offered intriguing perspectives on the intertwining of agriculture and modern digital expressions. In "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan, the echoes of humanity's relationship with food and technology reverberate in a manner that seems eerily relevant to our current exploration. Furthermore, "The Fate of Food" by Amanda Little delves into the intersection of farming and technology, subtly hinting at the potential ramifications of GMOs on human behavior.
As we traverse the realms of fiction, works like "The Children of the Corn" by Stephen King and "Silent Spring" by Rachel Carson add a dash of speculative flavor to our understanding of GMO corn's potential effects on human psychology. The way in which these authors weave tales of agricultural intrigue and ecological mystery seems to echo the very perplexities we encounter in our investigation.
It is important to note that our literature review was not restricted to traditional scholarly sources. In our pursuit of comprehensive understanding, we turned over every proverbial cob in search of insight. Some may consider it unorthodox, but we stand by the enlightening and, frankly, *corn-fusing* knowledge we gleaned from the backs of various shampoo bottles. The cryptic ingredients and tantalizing promises only served to enhance our understanding of the enigmatic connections we investigate.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the relationship between GMO corn cultivation and Google searches for "i cant even" has yielded results that are as surprising as they are chuckle-inducing. The correlation between these seemingly disparate variables turned out to be a--ingly strong, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9140529. This implies a robust positive association between the use of GMO corn and the frequency of searches for "i cant even" over the period from 2004 to 2023. It seems that this correlation husk be taken lightly.
The r-squared value of 0.8354927 further emphasizes the substantial connection between GMO corn and the exasperated phrase "i cant even," indicating that approximately 83.5% of the variability in "i cant even" searches can be explained by changes in GMO corn cultivation. It's obvious that the impact of GMO corn extends beyond agriculture to influence our digital expressions of frustration. It's a-maize-ing how these seemingly unrelated variables harmonize!
Moreover, the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 corroborates the validity of our findings, indicating that the observed correlation is not merely a figment of statistical coincidence. It's clear that this corn-y connection between GMO corn and "i cant even" searches warrants further investigation and raises intriguing questions about the intersection of agricultural practices and digital behavior.
These findings are succinctly encapsulated in Figure 1, showing a compelling scatterplot that visually confirms the potent positive relationship between GMO corn cultivation and Google searches for "i cant even". The data points are tightly clustered along the upward trend line, illustrating the strong association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that when it comes to GMO corn and internet exasperation, the correlation certainly *ears* its place in the academic spotlight.
As we ponder over these unexpected results, we must not forget to approach this research with a sense of humor and a willingness to embrace the kernel of truth behind this peculiar correlation. After all, sometimes the most fruitful discoveries emerge from the unlikeliest of pairings - just like a-maize-ing corn and the exasperated exclamations of "i cant even." This unlikely relationship surely deserves to be *ear-marked* for further exploration in both academic and comedic circles!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study undoubtedly lend weight to the previously scarce but intriguing literature on the intersection of GMO corn cultivation and the digital phenomenon of "i cant even" searches. Despite the comical implications of this association, our results substantiate the earlier suggestions by Smith and Doe (2018) and Jones et al. (2020). It appears that the inclination to exclaim "i cant even" might indeed be influenced by the proliferation of GMO corn. The relationship is as real as the husks on a corn cob—scratch that, it's cornfirmed!

The robust positive correlation observed in our study (r = 0.9140529) speaks volumes about the intriguing relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Our results echo the subtle hints provided by prior research and humorously elaborate on the potential implications—truly a-maize-ing, isn't it? It's as if the kernels of truth hidden in the literature on this subject have finally popped and revealed a *cornucopia* of insights.

The statistically significant p-value further bolsters the validity of our findings, substantiating the notion that the connection between GMO corn cultivation and "i cant even" searches is not an artifact of statistical shucking and jiving. Our findings urge us to embrace the notion that sometimes, truth is stranger than fiction—perhaps even as perplexing as finding elaborate references to *corn* in a scholarly discussion.

Our results not only contribute to the understanding of this quirky correlation but also emphasize the need for further exploration into the unexpected interplay between agricultural practices and modern digital vernacular. This study opens new channels for interdisciplinary investigations, encouraging researchers to cultivate a broader perspective and embrace the *ears* of knowledge that stem from unlikely pairings in data analysis.

In summary, the findings of this study not only validate the earlier inklings about the connection between GMO corn and "i cant even" expressions but also emphasize the importance of approaching research with an open mind and a willingness to embrace unexpected discoveries. We hope our study serves as a kernel of inspiration for future investigators in the potentially *ear-esistible* realm of agricultural and digital quirks! After all, as we've seen, when it comes to GMO corn and exasperated expressions, there's definitely more than meets the ear.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"GMO Corn and 'I Can't Even': A Kernel of Truth?"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the uncharted territory of genetically modified (GMO) corn and its potential impact on the perplexing phenomenon of people searching "i cant even" on Google. By examining USDA data on GMO corn cultivation and harnessing the power of Google Trends, we sought to shed light on this seemingly unlikely connection. Our findings revealed a strong positive correlation between the use of GMO corn and the frequency of Google searches for "i cant even," with a correlation coefficient of 0.9140529 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2023.

Our results suggest that the proliferation of GMO corn cultivation may indeed be linked to the surge in expressions of exasperation and disbelief epitomized by the phrase "i cant even." While the exact mechanisms underlying this correlation remain enigmatic, it is clear that a husk-y relationship exists between GMO corn and the exasperated utterances of internet users. It seems that this connection is not just corny—*cornet* be explained by mere coincidence. Our study opens new avenues for research, encouraging further exploration into the intersection of agricultural practices and digital expressions of frustration.

As we navigate through this research, one thing is abundantly clear: when it comes to understanding the impact of GMO corn on human behavior, we should approach it with a *kernal* of humor and a willingness to *cob*ble together unexpected findings. After all, what's research without a few *ear-resistible* puns along the way?

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Grains and groans, fellow scholars! Today, we embark on a corny quest that blends the fields of agricultural science and internet linguistics in an attempt to unravel the tangled web of GMO corn and the enigmatic phrase "i cant even." It's a-maize-ing how we stumbled upon this peculiar connection, but as scholars, we must embrace it with ears wide open and a hearty appetite for discovery.
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have long been a hot topic in scientific discourse, often stirring as much controversy as a pot of boiling corn. However, amidst the heated debates and husky skepticism, an unlikely and amusing correlation caught our attention—the apparent coupling of GMO corn and the exasperated online expression "i cant even." Now, if you'll allow me to *stalk* about this, I promise to keep the puns *ear-responsible*.
To *ketchup* with you, our study set out to plant the seeds of inquiry into this unexplored territory, drawing on USDA data on GMO corn cultivation as the *stalk* of our analysis. Pairing this harvest with the fruitful insights gleaned from Google Trends, we *corn-piled* a dataset that could shed light on the purported link between agriculture and modern expressions of exasperation.
It's no coincidence that our findings sprouted a statistically significant correlation between the use of GMO corn and the frequency of "i cant even" searches. The correlation coefficient of 0.9140529 is *ear-resistibly* high, leaving us to *maize* over the implications of this unlikely relationship. As the data unfolds, it's clear that the potential impact of GMO corn cultivation on the digital landscape goes beyond just *stalk* increases and *kernels* of truth – it's a-maize-ing how intertwined these elements truly are.
So, as we wade through the brambles of data and navigate the rows of statistical analyses, let's not forget to embrace the humor in unraveling this *corn-plicated* mystery. After all, when the going gets tough, what better way to *butter* us up than with a few witty puns and a *flourish* of levity? Let's shuck off any preconceived notions and *corn-fidently* dive into this *kernel* of truth with a good laugh and a sturdy sense of curiosity.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the relationship between GMO corn cultivation and Google searches for "i cant even" has yielded results that are as surprising as they are chuckle-inducing. The correlation between these seemingly disparate variables turned out to be a--ingly strong, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9140529. This implies a robust positive association between the use of GMO corn and the frequency of searches for "i cant even" over the period from 2004 to 2023. It seems that this correlation husk be taken lightly.
The r-squared value of 0.8354927 further emphasizes the substantial connection between GMO corn and the exasperated phrase "i cant even," indicating that approximately 83.5% of the variability in "i cant even" searches can be explained by changes in GMO corn cultivation. It's obvious that the impact of GMO corn extends beyond agriculture to influence our digital expressions of frustration. It's a-maize-ing how these seemingly unrelated variables harmonize!
Moreover, the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 corroborates the validity of our findings, indicating that the observed correlation is not merely a figment of statistical coincidence. It's clear that this corn-y connection between GMO corn and "i cant even" searches warrants further investigation and raises intriguing questions about the intersection of agricultural practices and digital behavior.
These findings are succinctly encapsulated in Figure 1, showing a compelling scatterplot that visually confirms the potent positive relationship between GMO corn cultivation and Google searches for "i cant even". The data points are tightly clustered along the upward trend line, illustrating the strong association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that when it comes to GMO corn and internet exasperation, the correlation certainly *ears* its place in the academic spotlight.
As we ponder over these unexpected results, we must not forget to approach this research with a sense of humor and a willingness to embrace the kernel of truth behind this peculiar correlation. After all, sometimes the most fruitful discoveries emerge from the unlikeliest of pairings - just like a-maize-ing corn and the exasperated exclamations of "i cant even." This unlikely relationship surely deserves to be *ear-marked* for further exploration in both academic and comedic circles!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has shelled out some surprising findings about the connection between GMO corn and Google searches for "i cant even." The statistically robust correlation we uncovered raises as many eyebrows as it does chuckles, leaving us *ear-resistibly* amused by the unexpected union of agricultural practices and digital expressions of exasperation. It seems that when it comes to GMO corn and internet exasperation, the correlation certainly *ears* its place in the academic spotlight.

Our results certainly *corn-firm* the existence of a husk-y relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the enigmatic phrase "i cant even." It's as clear as day that this correlation is not just a-maize-ing, but indeed statistically significant, with a p-value that husks away any doubts.

As we wrap up this study, let's *stalk* about the implications of our findings. While we may never fully *corn-prehend* the exact mechanisms underlying this unusual correlation, our endeavor has certainly sown the seeds for future research in this *ear-ily* amusing area at the intersection of agriculture and human behavior.

In the spirit of scientific inquiry and a-maize-ment, we must accept that sometimes unexpected correlations are part and parcel of rigorous research. So, let's *ketchup* our breath and appreciate the humor in this unlikely connection, for as researchers, we must always approach our work with *ear-resistible* curiosity and an appetite for discovery.

In the vein of scientific breakthroughs, and in the name of *corn-clusive* research, we can confidently assert that no further research is needed in this area. After all, when it comes to GMO corn and "i cant even" searches, it seems we've hit the *cob* on the head.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited GMO Corn and 'I Can't Even': A Kernel of Truth?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Absurdities


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited GMO Corn and 'I Can't Even': A Kernel of Truth?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Agricultural Anomaly Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled GMO Corn and 'I Can't Even': A Kernel of Truth? with an abstract of In this study, we delved into the uncharted territory of genetically modified (GMO) corn and its potential impact on the perplexing phenomenon of people searching "i cant even" on Google. By examining USDA data on GMO corn cultivation and harnessing the power of Google Trends, we sought to shed light on this seemingly unlikely connection. Our findings revealed a strong positive correlation between the use of GMO corn and the frequency of Google searches for "i cant even," with a correlation coefficient of 0.9140529 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2023.
Our results suggest that the proliferation of GMO corn cultivation may indeed be linked to the surge in expressions of exasperation and disbelief epitomized by the phrase "i cant even." While the exact mechanisms underlying this correlation remain enigmatic, it is clear that a husk-y relationship exists between GMO corn and the exasperated utterances of internet users. It seems that this connection is not just corny—*cornet* be explained by mere coincidence. Our study opens new avenues for research, encouraging further exploration into the intersection of agricultural practices and digital expressions of frustration.
As we navigate through this research, one thing is abundantly clear: when it comes to understanding the impact of GMO corn on human behavior, we should approach it with a *kernal* of humor and a willingness to *cob*ble together unexpected findings. After all, what's research without a few *ear-resistible* puns along the way?

ChatGPT:

GMO, genetically modified corn, USDA data, GMO corn cultivation, Google Trends, correlation, "i cant even" searches, internet user behavior, agricultural practices, digital expressions, frustration, human behavior, research, humor, puns, correlation coefficient, p-value, statistical significance, mechanism

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in United States genetically modified with both Bt and HT
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn

Google searches for 'i cant even'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'i cant even' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'i cant even'

Correlation r = 0.9140529 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8354927 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'i cant even') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn) over the 20 years from 2004 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.8E-8. 0.0000000177331114436634230000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 1.8E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 56,391,683 random variables You don't actually need 56 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.79, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
GMO use in corn (GMO corn %)69152840464749527176777677808079818182
Google searches for 'i cant even' (Rel. search volume)11.83332433.58333234.7537.560.2563.333354.333363.2570.833374.7571.166772.41676355.916764.08336572.083382.1111




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([6,9,15,28,40,46,47,49,52,71,76,77,76,77,80,80,79,81,81,82,])
array_2 = np.array([11.8333,24,33.5833,32,34.75,37.5,60.25,63.3333,54.3333,63.25,70.8333,74.75,71.1667,72.4167,63,55.9167,64.0833,65,72.0833,82.1111,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'i cant even'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 3665 · Black Variable ID: 752 · Red Variable ID: 1525
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0