about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,627 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Bryson and the second variable is The number of statisticians in Oklahoma.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the name Bryson gained prominence, parents couldn't help but factor in the allure of statistics. It seems the irrational influence of this name led to a significant correlation with an influx of statisticians in Oklahoma. It's as if the mere utterance of Bryson had a coefficient of determination on career choices in the state. Who would have thought that a name could have such a statistical significance? It's like they say, when it comes to the name Bryson, you can't take the variability out of the outcome!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image of a vibrant downtown square in Oklahoma City, where a large digital screen displays a graph showcasing the popularity of the first name Bryson. In the foreground, crowds of people gather around the screen, pointing and engaging in lively conversations. Closer to the screen, a group of bustling statisticians wearing lab coats and glasses analyze the data on the graph with great enthusiasm. Capture the simultaneous rise in the popularity of the name Bryson and the surge in statistical analysis, depicting the bustling city scene with dynamic movement and energy. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Bryson and The number of statisticians in Oklahoma. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Low poly 3D Pixar Style Symbolism A scene from Skyrim An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'
ChatGPT: Symbolism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Bryson and The number of statisticians in Oklahoma, in the following situation: Because as the popularity of the first name Bryson increased, there was a corresponding surge in statistical analysis of baby name trends in Oklahoma, leading to an influx of statisticians in the state. The demand for data on the prevalence of the name Bryson intersected with the burgeoning interest in statistical analysis, resulting in a statistical boom among the Sooner State population.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Oklahoma city, a graph featuring the popularity of the first name Bryson is displayed on a large digital screen in a vibrant downtown square. People gather around, talking animatedly as they point to the graph. Nearby, a group of bustling statisticians in lab coats and glasses eagerly discuss the latest baby name trend analysis, while a crowd eagerly listens in and takes notes. The scene conveys the simultaneous rise in the popularity of the name Bryson and the surge in statistical analysis, with an increase of statisticians excitedly delving into the baby name data.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Symbolism ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Oklahoma city, a graph featuring the popularity of the first name Bryson is displayed on a large digital screen in a vibrant downtown square. People gather around, talking animatedly as they point to the graph. Nearby, a group of bustling statisticians in lab coats and glasses eagerly discuss the latest baby name trend analysis, while a crowd eagerly listens in and takes notes. The scene conveys the simultaneous rise in the popularity of the name Bryson and the surge in statistical analysis, with an increase of statisticians excitedly delving into the baby name data. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image of a vibrant downtown square in Oklahoma City, where a large digital screen displays a graph showcasing the popularity of the first name Bryson. In the foreground, crowds of people gather around the screen, pointing and engaging in lively conversations. Closer to the screen, a group of bustling statisticians wearing lab coats and glasses analyze the data on the graph with great enthusiasm. Capture the simultaneous rise in the popularity of the name Bryson and the surge in statistical analysis, depicting the bustling city scene with dynamic movement and energy.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Bryson caused The number of statisticians in Oklahoma to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Bryson Dynasty and Statisticians in Oklahoma: A Surprising Symphony?

The Journal of Quirky Statistical Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Bryson and The number of statisticians in Oklahoma. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8214187 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Bryson Dynasty and Statisticians in Oklahoma: A Surprising Symphony?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing puzzle of the potential relationship between the rising popularity of the first name Bryson and the number of statisticians in the plains of Oklahoma. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team conducted an in-depth statistical analysis to untangle this enigmatic, and some might say whimsical, connection.

Upon rigorous analysis, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8214187 and a p-value less than 0.01 validate the existence of an unexpected affinity between the ascendancy of the name Bryson and the burgeoning legion of number-crunching experts in the Sooner State. This unprecedented correlation begs the question: are naming trends and statistical pursuits coalescing in a harmonic convergence, or is this purely a statistical mirage lurking amidst the sprawling plains of data?

Delving deeper into the realm of nomenclature and numerics may indeed hold the key to unlocking further mysteries within societal dynamics. As we unveil this unexpected correlation, it’s worth pondering whether the echoes of Bryson's growing popularity are resonating in the corridors of statistical analysis in the heartland. This research ignites a beacon for future studies to explore the whimsical intersections of names and numbers, offering a perhaps unexpected renaissance in the fusion of social nomenclature and quantitative inquiry. And who said statistics couldn't be infused with a dose of levity?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Bryson and The number of statisticians in Oklahoma. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bryson Dynasty and Statisticians in Oklahoma: A Surprising Symphony?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing puzzle of the potential relationship between the rising popularity of the first name Bryson and the number of statisticians in the plains of Oklahoma. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team conducted an in-depth statistical analysis to untangle this enigmatic, and some might say whimsical, connection.

Upon rigorous analysis, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8214187 and a p-value less than 0.01 validate the existence of an unexpected affinity between the ascendancy of the name Bryson and the burgeoning legion of number-crunching experts in the Sooner State. This unprecedented correlation begs the question: are naming trends and statistical pursuits coalescing in a harmonic convergence, or is this purely a statistical mirage lurking amidst the sprawling plains of data?

Delving deeper into the realm of nomenclature and numerics may indeed hold the key to unlocking further mysteries within societal dynamics. As we unveil this unexpected correlation, it’s worth pondering whether the echoes of Bryson's growing popularity are resonating in the corridors of statistical analysis in the heartland. This research ignites a beacon for future studies to explore the whimsical intersections of names and numbers, offering a perhaps unexpected renaissance in the fusion of social nomenclature and quantitative inquiry. And who said statistics couldn't be infused with a dose of levity?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

The intersection between human nomenclature and the intricate world of statistics has long been an area of study rife with surprises, anomalies, and the occasional statistical quirk. Our study embarks upon a journey to shed light on the enigmatic relationship between the meteoric rise of the first name Bryson and the vibrant community of statisticians bustling in the plains of Oklahoma. Are we about to unveil an unforeseen symphony of social nomenclature and numerical inquiry, or are we simply treading on statistical thin ice?

As we tread lightly through the expanse of this seemingly absurd inquiry, it is essential to recognize the subtle societal dynamics at play, where a name has the uncanny ability to resonate through time and space, perhaps wielding influence over domains one might never anticipate. Our research aims to peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, infusing a dash of statistical seasoning and a pinch of levity into the typically austere realm of academic inquiry.

The serendipitous capture of a robust correlation coefficient, akin to stumbling upon a statistical diamond in the rough, piques our curiosity. Like discovering a well-hidden Easter egg in the annals of data analysis, the correlation coefficient of 0.8214187 serves as a beacon, illuminating the intriguing nexus between a name's popularity and the statistical prowess burgeoning within the Sooner State.

Through a whimsical convergence of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we venture into the statistical wilderness, armed with an arsenal of regression analyses and hypothesis testing, to unravel this improbable association. With a p-value teasingly below 0.01, our findings venture into the territory of statistical whimsy, inviting us to question the very fabric of societal naming trends and professional pursuits in the domain of statistics.

Let us embark on this symphonic journey of discovery, where the cadence of Bryson's rise and the numerical chimes of statisticians appear destined for an unexpected duet, resonating through the corridors of academic inquiry and societal whimsy. Are we witnessing an unexpected renaissance in the fusion of social nomenclature and quantitative inquiry, or are we merely chasing statistical phantoms in the great plains of Oklahoma? Join us as we unravel this curious tale of names and numbers, offering a momentary escape from the rigidity of statistical norms and ushering in an era where science and levity embrace in a whimsical pas de deux.

In the spirit of scientific inquiry, let us heed Shakespeare's words and ask: "What's in a name?" It turns out, perhaps, more than we ever dared to imagine.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Bryson and The number of statisticians in Oklahoma. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bryson Dynasty and Statisticians in Oklahoma: A Surprising Symphony?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing puzzle of the potential relationship between the rising popularity of the first name Bryson and the number of statisticians in the plains of Oklahoma. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team conducted an in-depth statistical analysis to untangle this enigmatic, and some might say whimsical, connection.

Upon rigorous analysis, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8214187 and a p-value less than 0.01 validate the existence of an unexpected affinity between the ascendancy of the name Bryson and the burgeoning legion of number-crunching experts in the Sooner State. This unprecedented correlation begs the question: are naming trends and statistical pursuits coalescing in a harmonic convergence, or is this purely a statistical mirage lurking amidst the sprawling plains of data?

Delving deeper into the realm of nomenclature and numerics may indeed hold the key to unlocking further mysteries within societal dynamics. As we unveil this unexpected correlation, it’s worth pondering whether the echoes of Bryson's growing popularity are resonating in the corridors of statistical analysis in the heartland. This research ignites a beacon for future studies to explore the whimsical intersections of names and numbers, offering a perhaps unexpected renaissance in the fusion of social nomenclature and quantitative inquiry. And who said statistics couldn't be infused with a dose of levity?

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The intersection between human nomenclature and the intricate world of statistics has long been an area of study rife with surprises, anomalies, and the occasional statistical quirk. Our study embarks upon a journey to shed light on the enigmatic relationship between the meteoric rise of the first name Bryson and the vibrant community of statisticians bustling in the plains of Oklahoma. Are we about to unveil an unforeseen symphony of social nomenclature and numerical inquiry, or are we simply treading on statistical thin ice?
As we tread lightly through the expanse of this seemingly absurd inquiry, it is essential to recognize the subtle societal dynamics at play, where a name has the uncanny ability to resonate through time and space, perhaps wielding influence over domains one might never anticipate. Our research aims to peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, infusing a dash of statistical seasoning and a pinch of levity into the typically austere realm of academic inquiry.
The serendipitous capture of a robust correlation coefficient, akin to stumbling upon a statistical diamond in the rough, piques our curiosity. Like discovering a well-hidden Easter egg in the annals of data analysis, the correlation coefficient of 0.8214187 serves as a beacon, illuminating the intriguing nexus between a name's popularity and the statistical prowess burgeoning within the Sooner State.
Through a whimsical convergence of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we venture into the statistical wilderness, armed with an arsenal of regression analyses and hypothesis testing, to unravel this improbable association. With a p-value teasingly below 0.01, our findings venture into the territory of statistical whimsy, inviting us to question the very fabric of societal naming trends and professional pursuits in the domain of statistics.
Let us embark on this symphonic journey of discovery, where the cadence of Bryson's rise and the numerical chimes of statisticians appear destined for an unexpected duet, resonating through the corridors of academic inquiry and societal whimsy. Are we witnessing an unexpected renaissance in the fusion of social nomenclature and quantitative inquiry, or are we merely chasing statistical phantoms in the great plains of Oklahoma? Join us as we unravel this curious tale of names and numbers, offering a momentary escape from the rigidity of statistical norms and ushering in an era where science and levity embrace in a whimsical pas de deux.
In the spirit of scientific inquiry, let us heed Shakespeare's words and ask: "What's in a name?" It turns out, perhaps, more than we ever dared to imagine.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, Smith et al. (2015) proposed a framework to explore the relationship between societal naming trends and professional vocations. The study, conducted over a span of ten years, uncovered intriguing patterns in the ebb and flow of first name popularity and the corresponding fluctuations in career paths. Expanding upon this foundation, Doe and Jones (2018) examined the intricate interplay between naming conventions and regional economic landscapes, shedding light on the potential impact of nomenclature on occupational pursuits.

While these studies provided valuable insights, our research seeks to push the boundaries of inquiry, delving into an unforeseen realm where the resonance of Bryson's burgeoning popularity seems to intersect with the surging cohort of statisticians in the plains of Oklahoma. Such an unexpected correlation raises the stakes, transcending the commonplace nature of traditional statistical inquiries and beckoning us to contemplate the whimsical harmonies echoing within this newfound connection.

Turning to the realm of literature that transcends the academic sphere, "Freakonomics" (Levitt & Dubner, 2005) offers a compelling narrative on the unexpected intersections of social phenomena and analytical investigation. From the intriguing anomalies of human behavior to the unconventional correlations between seemingly unrelated variables, the book challenges us to embrace the serendipitous nature of statistical inquiry. Similarly, "Outliers" (Gladwell, 2008) captivates readers with narratives of unexpected success, prompting introspection on the unanticipated forces at play in shaping professional trajectories.

Venturing further into the domain of fiction, "The Name of the Wind" (Rothfuss, 2007) beckons readers into a world where the power of names holds a mystique that blurs the lines between reality and imagination. In a parallel universe, "The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat" (Sacks, 1985) offers a thought-provoking compilation of clinical anecdotes, perhaps tangentially relevant to our exploration of the subtle enigmas dwelling within the realms of nomenclature and numerical analysis.

Moreover, anecdotal evidence from social media platforms accentuates the growing discourse surrounding the juxtaposition of popular names and professional clusters. A post by @DataEnigma on Twitter humorously speculates, "Are statisticians in Oklahoma secretly petitioning for everyone to name their kids Bryson? 🤔 #StatisticalMysteries" Such casual observations, while seemingly lighthearted, raise intriguing questions that prompt a deeper exploration into the unforeseen correlations manifesting within societal dynamics.

Embracing the levity that this interdisciplinary correlation invites, we find ourselves at a nexus where academic inquiry and whimsical curiosity converge. As we navigate through this curious tapestry of names and numbers, the atypical resonance between the ascendance of Bryson and the statistical tapestry unfurling in Oklahoma beckons us to ponder the lighthearted symphony of these unexpected correlations.

Intriguingly, our inquiry extends beyond the confines of traditional statistical investigation, venturing into the realm of whimsy and delightful speculation. The line between academic rigor and playful curiosity blurs as we present our findings, offering a humorous interlude in the usually somber landscape of statistical inquiry. After all, who said statistics couldn't be infused with a dose of levity?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Bryson and The number of statisticians in Oklahoma. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bryson Dynasty and Statisticians in Oklahoma: A Surprising Symphony?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing puzzle of the potential relationship between the rising popularity of the first name Bryson and the number of statisticians in the plains of Oklahoma. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team conducted an in-depth statistical analysis to untangle this enigmatic, and some might say whimsical, connection.

Upon rigorous analysis, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8214187 and a p-value less than 0.01 validate the existence of an unexpected affinity between the ascendancy of the name Bryson and the burgeoning legion of number-crunching experts in the Sooner State. This unprecedented correlation begs the question: are naming trends and statistical pursuits coalescing in a harmonic convergence, or is this purely a statistical mirage lurking amidst the sprawling plains of data?

Delving deeper into the realm of nomenclature and numerics may indeed hold the key to unlocking further mysteries within societal dynamics. As we unveil this unexpected correlation, it’s worth pondering whether the echoes of Bryson's growing popularity are resonating in the corridors of statistical analysis in the heartland. This research ignites a beacon for future studies to explore the whimsical intersections of names and numbers, offering a perhaps unexpected renaissance in the fusion of social nomenclature and quantitative inquiry. And who said statistics couldn't be infused with a dose of levity?

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The intersection between human nomenclature and the intricate world of statistics has long been an area of study rife with surprises, anomalies, and the occasional statistical quirk. Our study embarks upon a journey to shed light on the enigmatic relationship between the meteoric rise of the first name Bryson and the vibrant community of statisticians bustling in the plains of Oklahoma. Are we about to unveil an unforeseen symphony of social nomenclature and numerical inquiry, or are we simply treading on statistical thin ice?
As we tread lightly through the expanse of this seemingly absurd inquiry, it is essential to recognize the subtle societal dynamics at play, where a name has the uncanny ability to resonate through time and space, perhaps wielding influence over domains one might never anticipate. Our research aims to peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, infusing a dash of statistical seasoning and a pinch of levity into the typically austere realm of academic inquiry.
The serendipitous capture of a robust correlation coefficient, akin to stumbling upon a statistical diamond in the rough, piques our curiosity. Like discovering a well-hidden Easter egg in the annals of data analysis, the correlation coefficient of 0.8214187 serves as a beacon, illuminating the intriguing nexus between a name's popularity and the statistical prowess burgeoning within the Sooner State.
Through a whimsical convergence of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we venture into the statistical wilderness, armed with an arsenal of regression analyses and hypothesis testing, to unravel this improbable association. With a p-value teasingly below 0.01, our findings venture into the territory of statistical whimsy, inviting us to question the very fabric of societal naming trends and professional pursuits in the domain of statistics.
Let us embark on this symphonic journey of discovery, where the cadence of Bryson's rise and the numerical chimes of statisticians appear destined for an unexpected duet, resonating through the corridors of academic inquiry and societal whimsy. Are we witnessing an unexpected renaissance in the fusion of social nomenclature and quantitative inquiry, or are we merely chasing statistical phantoms in the great plains of Oklahoma? Join us as we unravel this curious tale of names and numbers, offering a momentary escape from the rigidity of statistical norms and ushering in an era where science and levity embrace in a whimsical pas de deux.
In the spirit of scientific inquiry, let us heed Shakespeare's words and ask: "What's in a name?" It turns out, perhaps, more than we ever dared to imagine.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
Our research team embarked on an intrepid quest across the digital landscape, scouring the archives of the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to unearth the hidden connections between the meteoric ascent of the name Bryson and the statistical prowess thriving within Oklahoma. Armed with an unwavering commitment to thoroughness, we traversed the electronic highways of data extraction, diligently harvesting information between the years 2003 and 2022. While some may liken this process to a statistical treasure hunt, we took pride in our ability to navigate the labyrinthine corridors of big data with the precision of an expert cartographer.

Statistical Analysis:
With a trove of data at our disposal, we employed an arsenal of statistical machinations to unravel the mysterious interplay between nomenclature and numerics. Our team conducted rigorous regression analyses, leveraging the formidable power of multivariate models to decipher the cryptic relationship between the popularity of the name Bryson and the burgeoning community of statisticians in the heart of the Great Plains. As we delved into the depths of statistical significance, we could almost hear the whispers of numbers harmonizing with the echoes of names, a symphony of data dancing its way into the annals of academic inquiry.

Correlation Coefficients and Hypothesis Testing:
Like intrepid explorers navigating uncharted territory, we unearthed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8214187, a statistical galleon sailing through the tempestuous seas of naming trends and numerical dynamics. Paired with a p-value that tantalizingly danced below 0.01, our findings beckoned us into the territory of statistical whimsy, where the unexpected often conceals profound insights. Embracing the spirit of Shakespearean inquiry, we dared to ask: "Could it be that in a name, there lies more than meets the statistical eye?"

Cross-Validation and Sensitivity Analysis:
To ensure the resilience of our findings, we subjected our models to a battery of rigorous cross-validation and sensitivity analyses. Like knights of old, guarding the gates of statistical integrity, we scrutinized our results through the lens of robustness and reproducibility. With a touch of statistical alchemy, we sought to distill the essence of our findings, unveiling a truth that transcends mere numbers and names, if such a truth indeed exists in the wondrous tapestry of statistical inquiry.

---

This is such great fun! Please let me know if you'd like me to continue with the rest of the Methods section, or if there's anything else I can help you with.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Bryson and The number of statisticians in Oklahoma. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8214187, r-squared of 0.6747286, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bryson Dynasty and Statisticians in Oklahoma: A Surprising Symphony?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing puzzle of the potential relationship between the rising popularity of the first name Bryson and the number of statisticians in the plains of Oklahoma. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team conducted an in-depth statistical analysis to untangle this enigmatic, and some might say whimsical, connection.

Upon rigorous analysis, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8214187 and a p-value less than 0.01 validate the existence of an unexpected affinity between the ascendancy of the name Bryson and the burgeoning legion of number-crunching experts in the Sooner State. This unprecedented correlation begs the question: are naming trends and statistical pursuits coalescing in a harmonic convergence, or is this purely a statistical mirage lurking amidst the sprawling plains of data?

Delving deeper into the realm of nomenclature and numerics may indeed hold the key to unlocking further mysteries within societal dynamics. As we unveil this unexpected correlation, it’s worth pondering whether the echoes of Bryson's growing popularity are resonating in the corridors of statistical analysis in the heartland. This research ignites a beacon for future studies to explore the whimsical intersections of names and numbers, offering a perhaps unexpected renaissance in the fusion of social nomenclature and quantitative inquiry. And who said statistics couldn't be infused with a dose of levity?

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
The intersection between human nomenclature and the intricate world of statistics has long been an area of study rife with surprises, anomalies, and the occasional statistical quirk. Our study embarks upon a journey to shed light on the enigmatic relationship between the meteoric rise of the first name Bryson and the vibrant community of statisticians bustling in the plains of Oklahoma. Are we about to unveil an unforeseen symphony of social nomenclature and numerical inquiry, or are we simply treading on statistical thin ice?
As we tread lightly through the expanse of this seemingly absurd inquiry, it is essential to recognize the subtle societal dynamics at play, where a name has the uncanny ability to resonate through time and space, perhaps wielding influence over domains one might never anticipate. Our research aims to peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, infusing a dash of statistical seasoning and a pinch of levity into the typically austere realm of academic inquiry.
The serendipitous capture of a robust correlation coefficient, akin to stumbling upon a statistical diamond in the rough, piques our curiosity. Like discovering a well-hidden Easter egg in the annals of data analysis, the correlation coefficient of 0.8214187 serves as a beacon, illuminating the intriguing nexus between a name's popularity and the statistical prowess burgeoning within the Sooner State.
Through a whimsical convergence of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we venture into the statistical wilderness, armed with an arsenal of regression analyses and hypothesis testing, to unravel this improbable association. With a p-value teasingly below 0.01, our findings venture into the territory of statistical whimsy, inviting us to question the very fabric of societal naming trends and professional pursuits in the domain of statistics.
Let us embark on this symphonic journey of discovery, where the cadence of Bryson's rise and the numerical chimes of statisticians appear destined for an unexpected duet, resonating through the corridors of academic inquiry and societal whimsy. Are we witnessing an unexpected renaissance in the fusion of social nomenclature and quantitative inquiry, or are we merely chasing statistical phantoms in the great plains of Oklahoma? Join us as we unravel this curious tale of names and numbers, offering a momentary escape from the rigidity of statistical norms and ushering in an era where science and levity embrace in a whimsical pas de deux.
In the spirit of scientific inquiry, let us heed Shakespeare's words and ask: "What's in a name?" It turns out, perhaps, more than we ever dared to imagine.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our rigorous statistical analysis reveal a surprising and robust correlation between the popularity of the first name Bryson and the number of statisticians in the heartland of Oklahoma. Over the period from 2003 to 2022, our analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8214187, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) is 0.6747286, signifying that approximately 67.47% of the variability in the number of statisticians in Oklahoma can be explained by the popularity of the name Bryson. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of this unexpected association.

Fig. 1 illustrates the striking correlation between the rise of Bryson and the burgeoning community of statisticians in Oklahoma. The scatterplot depicts a clear and compelling pattern, reinforcing the substantive connection between the ascending popularity of the name Bryson and the proliferation of statisticians in the Sooner State.

The magnitude of this correlation, while surprising, raises intriguing questions about the potential influence of nomenclature on occupational pursuits. As we delve into the enigmatic orchestra of names and numbers, this correlation hints at a potentially symbiotic relationship between societal naming trends and professional vocations, beckoning for further exploration and interpretation.

Our findings, though seemingly whimsical, beckon us to consider whether the resonance of a name can extend its influence into the realms of statistical inquiry. This unearths a delightful avenue for future research to traverse the whimsical intersections of names and numbers, inviting a comical yet thought-provoking renaissance in the fusion of societal nomenclature and quantitative analysis.

In essence, this unforeseen correlation not only raises eyebrows but also resonates with Shakespeare's timeless query: "What's in a name?" The answer, it appears, may unfold amidst the perplexing landscape of data and statistics, where the unexpected interplay of names and numbers dances to a tune that transcends traditional scientific inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Bryson and The number of statisticians in Oklahoma. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Bryson Dynasty and Statisticians in Oklahoma: A Surprising Symphony?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing puzzle of the potential relationship between the rising popularity of the first name Bryson and the number of statisticians in the plains of Oklahoma. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team conducted an in-depth statistical analysis to untangle this enigmatic, and some might say whimsical, connection.

Upon rigorous analysis, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8214187 and a p-value less than 0.01 validate the existence of an unexpected affinity between the ascendancy of the name Bryson and the burgeoning legion of number-crunching experts in the Sooner State. This unprecedented correlation begs the question: are naming trends and statistical pursuits coalescing in a harmonic convergence, or is this purely a statistical mirage lurking amidst the sprawling plains of data?

Delving deeper into the realm of nomenclature and numerics may indeed hold the key to unlocking further mysteries within societal dynamics. As we unveil this unexpected correlation, it’s worth pondering whether the echoes of Bryson's growing popularity are resonating in the corridors of statistical analysis in the heartland. This research ignites a beacon for future studies to explore the whimsical intersections of names and numbers, offering a perhaps unexpected renaissance in the fusion of social nomenclature and quantitative inquiry. And who said statistics couldn't be infused with a dose of levity?

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, Smith et al. (2015) proposed a framework to explore the relationship between societal naming trends and professional vocations. The study, conducted over a span of ten years, uncovered intriguing patterns in the ebb and flow of first name popularity and the corresponding fluctuations in career paths. Expanding upon this foundation, Doe and Jones (2018) examined the intricate interplay between naming conventions and regional economic landscapes, shedding light on the potential impact of nomenclature on occupational pursuits.
While these studies provided valuable insights, our research seeks to push the boundaries of inquiry, delving into an unforeseen realm where the resonance of Bryson's burgeoning popularity seems to intersect with the surging cohort of statisticians in the plains of Oklahoma. Such an unexpected correlation raises the stakes, transcending the commonplace nature of traditional statistical inquiries and beckoning us to contemplate the whimsical harmonies echoing within this newfound connection.
Turning to the realm of literature that transcends the academic sphere, "Freakonomics" (Levitt & Dubner, 2005) offers a compelling narrative on the unexpected intersections of social phenomena and analytical investigation. From the intriguing anomalies of human behavior to the unconventional correlations between seemingly unrelated variables, the book challenges us to embrace the serendipitous nature of statistical inquiry. Similarly, "Outliers" (Gladwell, 2008) captivates readers with narratives of unexpected success, prompting introspection on the unanticipated forces at play in shaping professional trajectories.
Venturing further into the domain of fiction, "The Name of the Wind" (Rothfuss, 2007) beckons readers into a world where the power of names holds a mystique that blurs the lines between reality and imagination. In a parallel universe, "The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat" (Sacks, 1985) offers a thought-provoking compilation of clinical anecdotes, perhaps tangentially relevant to our exploration of the subtle enigmas dwelling within the realms of nomenclature and numerical analysis.
Moreover, anecdotal evidence from social media platforms accentuates the growing discourse surrounding the juxtaposition of popular names and professional clusters. A post by @DataEnigma on Twitter humorously speculates, "Are statisticians in Oklahoma secretly petitioning for everyone to name their kids Bryson? 🤔 #StatisticalMysteries" Such casual observations, while seemingly lighthearted, raise intriguing questions that prompt a deeper exploration into the unforeseen correlations manifesting within societal dynamics.
Embracing the levity that this interdisciplinary correlation invites, we find ourselves at a nexus where academic inquiry and whimsical curiosity converge. As we navigate through this curious tapestry of names and numbers, the atypical resonance between the ascendance of Bryson and the statistical tapestry unfurling in Oklahoma beckons us to ponder the lighthearted symphony of these unexpected correlations.
Intriguingly, our inquiry extends beyond the confines of traditional statistical investigation, venturing into the realm of whimsy and delightful speculation. The line between academic rigor and playful curiosity blurs as we present our findings, offering a humorous interlude in the usually somber landscape of statistical inquiry. After all, who said statistics couldn't be infused with a dose of levity?

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our rigorous statistical analysis reveal a surprising and robust correlation between the popularity of the first name Bryson and the number of statisticians in the heartland of Oklahoma. Over the period from 2003 to 2022, our analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8214187, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) is 0.6747286, signifying that approximately 67.47% of the variability in the number of statisticians in Oklahoma can be explained by the popularity of the name Bryson. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of this unexpected association.
Fig. 1 illustrates the striking correlation between the rise of Bryson and the burgeoning community of statisticians in Oklahoma. The scatterplot depicts a clear and compelling pattern, reinforcing the substantive connection between the ascending popularity of the name Bryson and the proliferation of statisticians in the Sooner State.
The magnitude of this correlation, while surprising, raises intriguing questions about the potential influence of nomenclature on occupational pursuits. As we delve into the enigmatic orchestra of names and numbers, this correlation hints at a potentially symbiotic relationship between societal naming trends and professional vocations, beckoning for further exploration and interpretation.
Our findings, though seemingly whimsical, beckon us to consider whether the resonance of a name can extend its influence into the realms of statistical inquiry. This unearths a delightful avenue for future research to traverse the whimsical intersections of names and numbers, inviting a comical yet thought-provoking renaissance in the fusion of societal nomenclature and quantitative analysis.
In essence, this unforeseen correlation not only raises eyebrows but also resonates with Shakespeare's timeless query: "What's in a name?" The answer, it appears, may unfold amidst the perplexing landscape of data and statistics, where the unexpected interplay of names and numbers dances to a tune that transcends traditional scientific inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The startling correlation uncovered in our research between the proliferation of statisticians in Oklahoma and the popularity of the name Bryson heralds a whimsical intersection in the realm of societal dynamics. While on the surface the connection may seem as improbable as the chance of finding a statistical outlier lurking in a hayfield, our robust findings bolster the veracity of this unprecedented relationship. It seems that there is more to a name than meets the eye, and perhaps the numeric fabric of society weaves an unexpected symphony of incongruous variables.

The resonance of this correlation echoes the seemingly lighthearted but deeply philosophical musings of "Freakonomics" and "Outliers," nudging us to contemplate the whimsical and serendipitous nature of statistical inquiry. Furthermore, the seemingly offhand social media commentary on the petition for the proliferation of the name Bryson might not be as facetious as it first appears, transcending the conventional confines of statistical investigation.

It is undeniable that our findings support and build upon the foundational work of Smith et al. and Doe and Jones, who revealed the captivating dance between naming conventions and professional pursuits. The unexpected correlation we have proffered opens the door to a playful avenue of research, inviting future scholars to prance through the fields of statistical whimsy.

Admittedly, the lingering question of whether the unexpected resonance of the name Bryson extends its influence into the realms of statistical inquiry conjures, in essence, a measure of delight. It is as though Shakespeare's eternal inquiry, "What's in a name?" has found resonance amidst the capricious nuances of our statistical findings. As we navigate through this compelling labyrinth of nomenclature and numerics, it becomes evident that the interplay of names and numbers embodies a playfulness and a thought-provoking symphony that transcends the predictable monotony of scientific inquiry.

In essence, our research underscores that statistics need not be an arid, humorless pursuit destined solely for the halls of academia. As we revel in the whimsical intersections of names and numbers, an unexpected renaissance unfolds, melding societal nomenclature with the light-hearted dance of quantitative analysis. For after all, who said statistics couldn't be infused with a dose of levity?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Bryson and The number of statisticians in Oklahoma. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Bryson Dynasty and Statisticians in Oklahoma: A Surprising Symphony?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing puzzle of the potential relationship between the rising popularity of the first name Bryson and the number of statisticians in the plains of Oklahoma. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team conducted an in-depth statistical analysis to untangle this enigmatic, and some might say whimsical, connection.

Upon rigorous analysis, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8214187 and a p-value less than 0.01 validate the existence of an unexpected affinity between the ascendancy of the name Bryson and the burgeoning legion of number-crunching experts in the Sooner State. This unprecedented correlation begs the question: are naming trends and statistical pursuits coalescing in a harmonic convergence, or is this purely a statistical mirage lurking amidst the sprawling plains of data?

Delving deeper into the realm of nomenclature and numerics may indeed hold the key to unlocking further mysteries within societal dynamics. As we unveil this unexpected correlation, it’s worth pondering whether the echoes of Bryson's growing popularity are resonating in the corridors of statistical analysis in the heartland. This research ignites a beacon for future studies to explore the whimsical intersections of names and numbers, offering a perhaps unexpected renaissance in the fusion of social nomenclature and quantitative inquiry. And who said statistics couldn't be infused with a dose of levity?

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
The intersection between human nomenclature and the intricate world of statistics has long been an area of study rife with surprises, anomalies, and the occasional statistical quirk. Our study embarks upon a journey to shed light on the enigmatic relationship between the meteoric rise of the first name Bryson and the vibrant community of statisticians bustling in the plains of Oklahoma. Are we about to unveil an unforeseen symphony of social nomenclature and numerical inquiry, or are we simply treading on statistical thin ice?
As we tread lightly through the expanse of this seemingly absurd inquiry, it is essential to recognize the subtle societal dynamics at play, where a name has the uncanny ability to resonate through time and space, perhaps wielding influence over domains one might never anticipate. Our research aims to peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, infusing a dash of statistical seasoning and a pinch of levity into the typically austere realm of academic inquiry.
The serendipitous capture of a robust correlation coefficient, akin to stumbling upon a statistical diamond in the rough, piques our curiosity. Like discovering a well-hidden Easter egg in the annals of data analysis, the correlation coefficient of 0.8214187 serves as a beacon, illuminating the intriguing nexus between a name's popularity and the statistical prowess burgeoning within the Sooner State.
Through a whimsical convergence of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we venture into the statistical wilderness, armed with an arsenal of regression analyses and hypothesis testing, to unravel this improbable association. With a p-value teasingly below 0.01, our findings venture into the territory of statistical whimsy, inviting us to question the very fabric of societal naming trends and professional pursuits in the domain of statistics.
Let us embark on this symphonic journey of discovery, where the cadence of Bryson's rise and the numerical chimes of statisticians appear destined for an unexpected duet, resonating through the corridors of academic inquiry and societal whimsy. Are we witnessing an unexpected renaissance in the fusion of social nomenclature and quantitative inquiry, or are we merely chasing statistical phantoms in the great plains of Oklahoma? Join us as we unravel this curious tale of names and numbers, offering a momentary escape from the rigidity of statistical norms and ushering in an era where science and levity embrace in a whimsical pas de deux.
In the spirit of scientific inquiry, let us heed Shakespeare's words and ask: "What's in a name?" It turns out, perhaps, more than we ever dared to imagine.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our rigorous statistical analysis reveal a surprising and robust correlation between the popularity of the first name Bryson and the number of statisticians in the heartland of Oklahoma. Over the period from 2003 to 2022, our analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8214187, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) is 0.6747286, signifying that approximately 67.47% of the variability in the number of statisticians in Oklahoma can be explained by the popularity of the name Bryson. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of this unexpected association.
Fig. 1 illustrates the striking correlation between the rise of Bryson and the burgeoning community of statisticians in Oklahoma. The scatterplot depicts a clear and compelling pattern, reinforcing the substantive connection between the ascending popularity of the name Bryson and the proliferation of statisticians in the Sooner State.
The magnitude of this correlation, while surprising, raises intriguing questions about the potential influence of nomenclature on occupational pursuits. As we delve into the enigmatic orchestra of names and numbers, this correlation hints at a potentially symbiotic relationship between societal naming trends and professional vocations, beckoning for further exploration and interpretation.
Our findings, though seemingly whimsical, beckon us to consider whether the resonance of a name can extend its influence into the realms of statistical inquiry. This unearths a delightful avenue for future research to traverse the whimsical intersections of names and numbers, inviting a comical yet thought-provoking renaissance in the fusion of societal nomenclature and quantitative analysis.
In essence, this unforeseen correlation not only raises eyebrows but also resonates with Shakespeare's timeless query: "What's in a name?" The answer, it appears, may unfold amidst the perplexing landscape of data and statistics, where the unexpected interplay of names and numbers dances to a tune that transcends traditional scientific inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the surging popularity of the name Bryson appears to be inextricably linked to the exponential rise of statisticians in the plains of Oklahoma. This unexpected correlation, akin to stumbling upon a statistical treasure amidst a heap of data, prompts contemplation of the whimsical intricacies permeating the realms of nomenclature and numerical pursuits. The robust correlation coefficient and the tantalizing p-value offer a respite from the rigidity of traditional statistical inquiry as we dance on the edge of statistical whimsy.

As we unfurl this peculiar tale of names and numbers, we are left pondering the improbable interplay between societal naming trends and professional vocations. The echoes of Bryson's ascendancy reverberating in the corridors of statistical analysis beckon for a momentary escape from the austerity of academic inquiries, inviting a dalliance with statistical serendipity. Thus, we find ourselves at a crossroads where statistical rigidity embraces a touch of levity, stirring a renaissance in the fusion of social nomenclature and quantitative analysis.

With a sly wink to Shakespeare’s timeless inquiry, "What’s in a name?" it seems the answer, as it turns out, might just be statistics. However, the unexpected resonance of Bryson's popularity with the proliferation of statisticians in Oklahoma leaves us with a curious yet intriguing revelation. It prompts us to proclaim, in the spirit of scientific inquiry, that no further research in this domain is required, lest we venture into the realm of statistical folly.

In the grand symphony of academic inquiry, our unlikely findings dance a jig of statistical whimsy, offering a momentary respite from the dogmas of traditional research. With this, we leave the gates ajar for future researchers to waltz into the intriguing confluence of names and numbers – a realm where science and levity pirouette in an unexpected pas de deux.

With this, we bid adieu to the comical conundrum of Bryson’s ascendancy and the legion of statisticians in the plains of Oklahoma, leaving a lasting echo of levity in the hallowed halls of scientific inquiry.

In the immortal words of the venerable bard, we declare: "O, wonderful, wonderful, and most wonderful wonderful! And yet again wonderful!"

No further research in this perplexing terrain of statistical whimsy is warranted.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Bryson Dynasty and Statisticians in Oklahoma: A Surprising Symphony?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Statistical Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Bryson Dynasty and Statisticians in Oklahoma: A Surprising Symphony?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Eccentric Data Analysis and Exploration (SEDAE)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Bryson Dynasty and Statisticians in Oklahoma: A Surprising Symphony? with an abstract of This study delves into the intriguing puzzle of the potential relationship between the rising popularity of the first name Bryson and the number of statisticians in the plains of Oklahoma. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team conducted an in-depth statistical analysis to untangle this enigmatic, and some might say whimsical, connection.
Upon rigorous analysis, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8214187 and a p-value less than 0.01 validate the existence of an unexpected affinity between the ascendancy of the name Bryson and the burgeoning legion of number-crunching experts in the Sooner State. This unprecedented correlation begs the question: are naming trends and statistical pursuits coalescing in a harmonic convergence, or is this purely a statistical mirage lurking amidst the sprawling plains of data?
Delving deeper into the realm of nomenclature and numerics may indeed hold the key to unlocking further mysteries within societal dynamics. As we unveil this unexpected correlation, it’s worth pondering whether the echoes of Bryson's growing popularity are resonating in the corridors of statistical analysis in the heartland. This research ignites a beacon for future studies to explore the whimsical intersections of names and numbers, offering a perhaps unexpected renaissance in the fusion of social nomenclature and quantitative inquiry. And who said statistics couldn't be infused with a dose of levity?

ChatGPT:

Bryson, dynasty, statisticians, Oklahoma, naming trends, statistical analysis, US Social Security Administration, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, p-value, Sooner State, societal dynamics, nomenclature, numerics, heartland, fusion, social nomenclature, quantitative inquiry, statistics, levity

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Bryson
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Bryson
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Bryson

The number of statisticians in Oklahoma
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of statisticians in Oklahoma
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of statisticians in Oklahoma

Correlation r = 0.8214187 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6747286 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 67.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of statisticians in Oklahoma) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Bryson) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.0E-6. 0.0000089943281389847330000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 0.0009% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 111,181 random variables You don't actually need 111 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.6, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Bryson (Babies born)16681933198623242337223526173404395140473819343531244374467442283640321531002692
The number of statisticians in Oklahoma (Statisticians)809080200190180110360310300160220200280330350260270240130




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1668,1933,1986,2324,2337,2235,2617,3404,3951,4047,3819,3435,3124,4374,4674,4228,3640,3215,3100,2692,])
array_2 = np.array([80,90,80,200,190,180,110,360,310,300,160,220,200,280,330,350,260,270,240,130,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Bryson"
array_2_name = "The number of statisticians in Oklahoma"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 3627 · Black Variable ID: 2700 · Red Variable ID: 13050
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0