about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,544 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Butter consumption and the second variable is Solar power generated in Luxembourg.  The chart goes from 2001 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As butter consumption increased, people's greasy fingers accidentally created a more reflective surface on solar panels, leading to greater sunlight absorption and an overall boost in solar power generation in Luxembourg. The power of dairy strikes again!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A scene from Skyrim ] Create an image of a picturesque neighborhood in Luxembourg, bathed in the warm glow of the sun. The traditional houses should exude coziness and charm, with each adorned with solar panels that glisten in the sunlight. The rooftops should be decorated with these sustainable energy sources, capturing the reflection of the sun off the buttery surfaces. Families should be depicted going about their daily activities, perhaps with some using their ovens to bake delicious treats, filling the air with the aroma of freshly baked goods. The overall scene should emphasize the harmonious blend of renewable energy and the simple joys of everyday life. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Butter consumption and Solar power generated in Luxembourg. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute cartoon Magic realism inspired by bauhaus Cute 2D animation A scene from Skyrim
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Butter consumption and Solar power generated in Luxembourg, in the following situation: Because as butter consumption increased, more people turned to baking at home which led to a rise in solar power usage to offset the energy consumption from all the ovens. The reflection of sunlight off all the buttery surfaces in the country also increased the efficiency of solar panels, creating a deliciously efficient cycle of renewable energy.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Luxembourg, the sun shines brightly over a neighborhood filled with cozy homes. The scent of freshly baked goods fills the air as families use their ovens to create delicious treats using lots of butter. The rooftops of the homes are adorned with solar panels, glistening in the sunlight. The panels are capturing the reflection of the sun off the buttery surfaces, boosting their efficiency and generating a deliciously efficient cycle of renewable energy.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: In Luxembourg, the sun shines brightly over a neighborhood filled with cozy homes. The scent of freshly baked goods fills the air as families use their ovens to create delicious treats using lots of butter. The rooftops of the homes are adorned with solar panels, glistening in the sunlight. The panels are capturing the reflection of the sun off the buttery surfaces, boosting their efficiency and generating a deliciously efficient cycle of renewable energy. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A scene from Skyrim ] Create an image of a picturesque neighborhood in Luxembourg, bathed in the warm glow of the sun. The traditional houses should exude coziness and charm, with each adorned with solar panels that glisten in the sunlight. The rooftops should be decorated with these sustainable energy sources, capturing the reflection of the sun off the buttery surfaces. Families should be depicted going about their daily activities, perhaps with some using their ovens to bake delicious treats, filling the air with the aroma of freshly baked goods. The overall scene should emphasize the harmonious blend of renewable energy and the simple joys of everyday life.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Butter consumption caused Solar power generated in Luxembourg to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Spreading Sunshine: The Buttery Connection Between Butter Consumption and Solar Power Generation in Luxembourg

The International Journal of Butter-Based Energy Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Solar power generated in Luxembourg. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from USDA and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9309750 and p < 0.01 for 2001 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading Sunshine: The Buttery Connection Between Butter Consumption and Solar Power Generation in Luxembourg

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to butter up the world of energy research by uncovering the delightfully unexpected connection between butter consumption and solar power generation in Luxembourg. With a taste for quirky correlations and a dollop of statistical analysis, we delved into USDA data on butter consumption and Energy Information Administration records on solar power generation to butter our way through a seemingly unrelated pair. To our surprise, the results churned out a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9309750, with p < 0.01, from 2001 to 2021 – enough to make even the most sceptical skeptics spread a smile. So, butter believe it or not, there just might be more to solar power than what meets the eye – or the toast!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Solar power generated in Luxembourg. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading Sunshine: The Buttery Connection Between Butter Consumption and Solar Power Generation in Luxembourg

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to butter up the world of energy research by uncovering the delightfully unexpected connection between butter consumption and solar power generation in Luxembourg. With a taste for quirky correlations and a dollop of statistical analysis, we delved into USDA data on butter consumption and Energy Information Administration records on solar power generation to butter our way through a seemingly unrelated pair. To our surprise, the results churned out a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9309750, with p < 0.01, from 2001 to 2021 – enough to make even the most sceptical skeptics spread a smile. So, butter believe it or not, there just might be more to solar power than what meets the eye – or the toast!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Butter and solar power – two things that may seem as unrelated as a cow in a spacesuit. Yet, in the world of research, we are no strangers to unexpected connections. Just as we uncovered the perplexing correlation between the amount of shoes in one's closet and the likelihood of rainy days (a sole-sapping discovery, indeed), we set our sights on Luxembourg, where the aroma of butter meets the bright glow of solar energy.

In recent years, Luxembourg has been churning out impressive numbers in solar power generation, catching the attention of energy enthusiasts and dairy connoisseurs alike. With a population known for its fondness for croissants and creamy pastries, we couldn't help but wonder – could there be more to this buttery delight than meets the eye? Could the spread of solar power be in some way linked to the spread of butter? These were the questions that led us on a whimsical journey through statistics, science, and perhaps a touch of culinary flair.

As we ventured into this uncharted territory of butter consumption and solar power generation, we were met with a mix of raised eyebrows and raised toast (for added research fuel, of course). Undeterred by the skeptics, we embarked on a quest to churn through the data, armed with spreadsheets and a sprinkle of scientific curiosity. What we found was enough to make us want to don our lab coats and chef hats simultaneously – a surprising and robust correlation that could very well be the butter to our bread and the rays to our solar panels.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Solar power generated in Luxembourg. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading Sunshine: The Buttery Connection Between Butter Consumption and Solar Power Generation in Luxembourg

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to butter up the world of energy research by uncovering the delightfully unexpected connection between butter consumption and solar power generation in Luxembourg. With a taste for quirky correlations and a dollop of statistical analysis, we delved into USDA data on butter consumption and Energy Information Administration records on solar power generation to butter our way through a seemingly unrelated pair. To our surprise, the results churned out a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9309750, with p < 0.01, from 2001 to 2021 – enough to make even the most sceptical skeptics spread a smile. So, butter believe it or not, there just might be more to solar power than what meets the eye – or the toast!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Butter and solar power – two things that may seem as unrelated as a cow in a spacesuit. Yet, in the world of research, we are no strangers to unexpected connections. Just as we uncovered the perplexing correlation between the amount of shoes in one's closet and the likelihood of rainy days (a sole-sapping discovery, indeed), we set our sights on Luxembourg, where the aroma of butter meets the bright glow of solar energy.
In recent years, Luxembourg has been churning out impressive numbers in solar power generation, catching the attention of energy enthusiasts and dairy connoisseurs alike. With a population known for its fondness for croissants and creamy pastries, we couldn't help but wonder – could there be more to this buttery delight than meets the eye? Could the spread of solar power be in some way linked to the spread of butter? These were the questions that led us on a whimsical journey through statistics, science, and perhaps a touch of culinary flair.
As we ventured into this uncharted territory of butter consumption and solar power generation, we were met with a mix of raised eyebrows and raised toast (for added research fuel, of course). Undeterred by the skeptics, we embarked on a quest to churn through the data, armed with spreadsheets and a sprinkle of scientific curiosity. What we found was enough to make us want to don our lab coats and chef hats simultaneously – a surprising and robust correlation that could very well be the butter to our bread and the rays to our solar panels.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their study, Smith et al. (2018) investigated the potential link between butter consumption and solar power generation in European nations. Utilizing data from Eurostat and the International Energy Agency, the authors found a weak correlation between per capita butter consumption and solar energy production, leading to cautious speculation about the underlying factors at play. Building on this line of inquiry, Doe and Jones (2019) delved into the cultural, economic, and environmental dimensions of butter consumption and renewable energy sources, shedding light on the complex interplay of dietary habits and energy transitions within a society.

Expanding beyond the realm of traditional academic research, books such as "The Butter Manifesto" by Dr. Margarine O. Logy and "The Solar Panel Secrets" by Elon Musk have offered unique perspectives on the intersection of buttery indulgence and sustainable energy solutions. Fictional works, including "The Butter Chronicles" series by Marge P. Leasant and "Solar Scones and Sunny Delights" by Ray Flare, have woven whimsical narratives that blur the boundaries between gastronomy and green technology, inspiring both laughter and contemplation.

As the investigation veered into unorthodox territory, the researchers turned to unconventional sources for insight. With a dash of humor and a pinch of curiosity, cartoons such as "The Adventures of Solar Butterman" and children's shows like "The Solar-Powered Butter Factory" provided unexpected inspiration for exploring the playful synergy between dairy delights and renewable resources. While these non-traditional avenues of inquiry may raise eyebrows in academic circles, they have enriched the discourse on buttery sustenance and sunny sustainability in ways that transcend conventional scholarly paradigms.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Solar power generated in Luxembourg. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2001 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading Sunshine: The Buttery Connection Between Butter Consumption and Solar Power Generation in Luxembourg

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to butter up the world of energy research by uncovering the delightfully unexpected connection between butter consumption and solar power generation in Luxembourg. With a taste for quirky correlations and a dollop of statistical analysis, we delved into USDA data on butter consumption and Energy Information Administration records on solar power generation to butter our way through a seemingly unrelated pair. To our surprise, the results churned out a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9309750, with p < 0.01, from 2001 to 2021 – enough to make even the most sceptical skeptics spread a smile. So, butter believe it or not, there just might be more to solar power than what meets the eye – or the toast!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Butter and solar power – two things that may seem as unrelated as a cow in a spacesuit. Yet, in the world of research, we are no strangers to unexpected connections. Just as we uncovered the perplexing correlation between the amount of shoes in one's closet and the likelihood of rainy days (a sole-sapping discovery, indeed), we set our sights on Luxembourg, where the aroma of butter meets the bright glow of solar energy.
In recent years, Luxembourg has been churning out impressive numbers in solar power generation, catching the attention of energy enthusiasts and dairy connoisseurs alike. With a population known for its fondness for croissants and creamy pastries, we couldn't help but wonder – could there be more to this buttery delight than meets the eye? Could the spread of solar power be in some way linked to the spread of butter? These were the questions that led us on a whimsical journey through statistics, science, and perhaps a touch of culinary flair.
As we ventured into this uncharted territory of butter consumption and solar power generation, we were met with a mix of raised eyebrows and raised toast (for added research fuel, of course). Undeterred by the skeptics, we embarked on a quest to churn through the data, armed with spreadsheets and a sprinkle of scientific curiosity. What we found was enough to make us want to don our lab coats and chef hats simultaneously – a surprising and robust correlation that could very well be the butter to our bread and the rays to our solar panels.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the unsolved mystery of the buttery connection between butter consumption and solar power generation in Luxembourg, we concocted a method as delectable as a perfectly buttered toast. We gathered data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, spanning the years 2001 to 2021, to whip up a hearty serving of statistical analysis and research wizardry.

First, we took a deep dive into the USDA’s butter consumption data, brushing away any margarine of error and ensuring our measurements were as accurate as a baker's scale. We carefully tabulated the annual per capita butter consumption in Luxembourg, understanding the importance of not simply spreading our wings, but also our data across the entirety of the provided timeline.

Next, we turned our focus to the Energy Information Administration records on solar power generation – a domain where the sun reigns supreme and where sunlight is the true source of power, as opposed to the mythical stellar abilities of butter. With calculations as precise as solar panels tracking the sun, we documented the annual solar power generation in Luxembourg, extracting insights from the photons of data captured across the years.

To ensure the robustness of our findings, we employed a range of sophisticated statistical techniques, walking the fine line between confidence intervals and measurement uncertaint(ies). After applying rigorous analysis and channeling our inner food chemists, we cooked up a correlation coefficient using the trusty Pearson’s method, exploring the relationship between butter consumption and solar power generation. The resulting coefficient was as creamy and smooth as freshly churned butter, revealing an unexpected and remarkably strong correlation of 0.9309750, with a p-value dancing below 0.01.

In our effort to provide a degree of causational seasoning to this delightful correlation, we dabbled in multivariate regression analysis to understand the extent to which butter consumption influences solar power generation, all while guarding against the temptation to butter up the results beyond their flavorful capabilities.

Armed with our customized computational models and a pinch of scientific skepticism, we ventured forth into uncharted territory, navigating the nuances of possible confounding variables and incorporating them into our analytical chef’s recipe book. Through this culinary quest, we aimed to sizzle up the ingredients of quantitative research methods and present the world with a serving of empirical evidence that makes both the culinary and scientific community spread a symphony of surprise.

With the aroma of data wafting through our research kitchen, we seek to illustrate the delightful yet unforeseen relationship between butter consumption and solar power generation, serving up a dish that may just alter our understanding of the toast – or rather, the coast – to a renewable future.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Solar power generated in Luxembourg. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2001 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9309750, r-squared of 0.8667145, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading Sunshine: The Buttery Connection Between Butter Consumption and Solar Power Generation in Luxembourg

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to butter up the world of energy research by uncovering the delightfully unexpected connection between butter consumption and solar power generation in Luxembourg. With a taste for quirky correlations and a dollop of statistical analysis, we delved into USDA data on butter consumption and Energy Information Administration records on solar power generation to butter our way through a seemingly unrelated pair. To our surprise, the results churned out a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9309750, with p < 0.01, from 2001 to 2021 – enough to make even the most sceptical skeptics spread a smile. So, butter believe it or not, there just might be more to solar power than what meets the eye – or the toast!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Butter and solar power – two things that may seem as unrelated as a cow in a spacesuit. Yet, in the world of research, we are no strangers to unexpected connections. Just as we uncovered the perplexing correlation between the amount of shoes in one's closet and the likelihood of rainy days (a sole-sapping discovery, indeed), we set our sights on Luxembourg, where the aroma of butter meets the bright glow of solar energy.
In recent years, Luxembourg has been churning out impressive numbers in solar power generation, catching the attention of energy enthusiasts and dairy connoisseurs alike. With a population known for its fondness for croissants and creamy pastries, we couldn't help but wonder – could there be more to this buttery delight than meets the eye? Could the spread of solar power be in some way linked to the spread of butter? These were the questions that led us on a whimsical journey through statistics, science, and perhaps a touch of culinary flair.
As we ventured into this uncharted territory of butter consumption and solar power generation, we were met with a mix of raised eyebrows and raised toast (for added research fuel, of course). Undeterred by the skeptics, we embarked on a quest to churn through the data, armed with spreadsheets and a sprinkle of scientific curiosity. What we found was enough to make us want to don our lab coats and chef hats simultaneously – a surprising and robust correlation that could very well be the butter to our bread and the rays to our solar panels.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In our expedition to uncover the hidden ties between butter consumption and solar power generation in Luxembourg, we stumbled upon a correlation that's as strong as a block of cheddar on a hot summer day. Our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9309750 between the annual butter consumption and solar power generated, with an r-squared of 0.8667145 and a p-value less than 0.01 – simply too gouda to be true!

As Fig. 1 illustrates, the scatterplot showcases a relationship so remarkable, it could butter your statistical bread for days. The data points are not just scattered – they're spread with the finesse of a perfectly buttered crumpet, showing a clear trend that could make even the most stoic scientists crack a smile.

Now, this isn't just a matter of spreading a thin layer of butter on our enthusiasm for correlations – this is a full-fledged discovery that's far from margarine-al. The connection between butter and solar power in Luxembourg, while initially bewildering, has churned out a creamy concoction of findings that could spread joy across energy research and culinary circles alike.

In conclusion, it seems that the solar power generation in Luxembourg might be on the rise, but it's not the only thing on the upswing – our appreciation for the deliciously unexpected links between seemingly disparate variables is also reaching new heights. So, whether you're on team "spread the sunshine" or team "butter believe it," one thing's for certain – the sweet, savory, and statistically delightful connection between butter consumption and solar power is the real, gooey deal.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Solar power generated in Luxembourg. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Spreading Sunshine: The Buttery Connection Between Butter Consumption and Solar Power Generation in Luxembourg

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to butter up the world of energy research by uncovering the delightfully unexpected connection between butter consumption and solar power generation in Luxembourg. With a taste for quirky correlations and a dollop of statistical analysis, we delved into USDA data on butter consumption and Energy Information Administration records on solar power generation to butter our way through a seemingly unrelated pair. To our surprise, the results churned out a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9309750, with p < 0.01, from 2001 to 2021 – enough to make even the most sceptical skeptics spread a smile. So, butter believe it or not, there just might be more to solar power than what meets the eye – or the toast!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study, Smith et al. (2018) investigated the potential link between butter consumption and solar power generation in European nations. Utilizing data from Eurostat and the International Energy Agency, the authors found a weak correlation between per capita butter consumption and solar energy production, leading to cautious speculation about the underlying factors at play. Building on this line of inquiry, Doe and Jones (2019) delved into the cultural, economic, and environmental dimensions of butter consumption and renewable energy sources, shedding light on the complex interplay of dietary habits and energy transitions within a society.
Expanding beyond the realm of traditional academic research, books such as "The Butter Manifesto" by Dr. Margarine O. Logy and "The Solar Panel Secrets" by Elon Musk have offered unique perspectives on the intersection of buttery indulgence and sustainable energy solutions. Fictional works, including "The Butter Chronicles" series by Marge P. Leasant and "Solar Scones and Sunny Delights" by Ray Flare, have woven whimsical narratives that blur the boundaries between gastronomy and green technology, inspiring both laughter and contemplation.
As the investigation veered into unorthodox territory, the researchers turned to unconventional sources for insight. With a dash of humor and a pinch of curiosity, cartoons such as "The Adventures of Solar Butterman" and children's shows like "The Solar-Powered Butter Factory" provided unexpected inspiration for exploring the playful synergy between dairy delights and renewable resources. While these non-traditional avenues of inquiry may raise eyebrows in academic circles, they have enriched the discourse on buttery sustenance and sunny sustainability in ways that transcend conventional scholarly paradigms.

[[RESULTS]]
In our expedition to uncover the hidden ties between butter consumption and solar power generation in Luxembourg, we stumbled upon a correlation that's as strong as a block of cheddar on a hot summer day. Our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9309750 between the annual butter consumption and solar power generated, with an r-squared of 0.8667145 and a p-value less than 0.01 – simply too gouda to be true!
As Fig. 1 illustrates, the scatterplot showcases a relationship so remarkable, it could butter your statistical bread for days. The data points are not just scattered – they're spread with the finesse of a perfectly buttered crumpet, showing a clear trend that could make even the most stoic scientists crack a smile.
Now, this isn't just a matter of spreading a thin layer of butter on our enthusiasm for correlations – this is a full-fledged discovery that's far from margarine-al. The connection between butter and solar power in Luxembourg, while initially bewildering, has churned out a creamy concoction of findings that could spread joy across energy research and culinary circles alike.
In conclusion, it seems that the solar power generation in Luxembourg might be on the rise, but it's not the only thing on the upswing – our appreciation for the deliciously unexpected links between seemingly disparate variables is also reaching new heights. So, whether you're on team "spread the sunshine" or team "butter believe it," one thing's for certain – the sweet, savory, and statistically delightful connection between butter consumption and solar power is the real, gooey deal.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our results provide a deeply spread, er, steeped insight into the uncharted realms of butter and solar power. It seems that the relationship between the two variables isn't just a flaky hypothesis but rather a substantial and robust connection worthy of being whipped into the spotlight.

Our correlation coefficient of 0.9309750 echoes the findings of Smith et al. (2018), who touched upon a tangential connection between buttery indulgence and solar energy. It appears that our results have churned out a correlation that not only reinforces but also emboldens the preceding cautious speculations regarding the influence of butter consumption on solar power. This strong correlation is as clear as the pat of butter on a fresh croissant, leaving little room for skepticism and offering a delightful spread of evidence supporting the unexpected link.

Doe and Jones (2019) also ventured into the realms of butter and its cultural, economic, and environmental facets, shedding light on the complex interplay between dietary habits and energy transitions. Our findings add a creamy layer of statistical accordance to their exploratory research, further solidifying the notion that butter consumption may indeed be intertwined with the generation of solar power. It seems the unorthodox perspectives and unconventional sources highlighted in our literature review have turned out to be not just a whisk in the dark but a beacon of legitimacy.

Our results do more than just raise eyebrows – they spread a grin from ear to ear. The scatterplot we unveiled is not just a visualization of data – it's a veritable masterpiece, reminding us that science can be as delightful and surprising as a beautifully buttered slice of toast.

So, while we have yet to untangle the exact mechanism behind the butter-solar power nexus, our findings highlight the importance of considering culinary customs and dietary preferences in the context of renewable energy adoption. This study encourages researchers to spread their investigative pursuits beyond conventional boundaries, reminding us that unexpected connections can be as rich and flavorful as a well-aged Gruyère.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Solar power generated in Luxembourg. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Spreading Sunshine: The Buttery Connection Between Butter Consumption and Solar Power Generation in Luxembourg

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to butter up the world of energy research by uncovering the delightfully unexpected connection between butter consumption and solar power generation in Luxembourg. With a taste for quirky correlations and a dollop of statistical analysis, we delved into USDA data on butter consumption and Energy Information Administration records on solar power generation to butter our way through a seemingly unrelated pair. To our surprise, the results churned out a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9309750, with p < 0.01, from 2001 to 2021 – enough to make even the most sceptical skeptics spread a smile. So, butter believe it or not, there just might be more to solar power than what meets the eye – or the toast!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Butter and solar power – two things that may seem as unrelated as a cow in a spacesuit. Yet, in the world of research, we are no strangers to unexpected connections. Just as we uncovered the perplexing correlation between the amount of shoes in one's closet and the likelihood of rainy days (a sole-sapping discovery, indeed), we set our sights on Luxembourg, where the aroma of butter meets the bright glow of solar energy.
In recent years, Luxembourg has been churning out impressive numbers in solar power generation, catching the attention of energy enthusiasts and dairy connoisseurs alike. With a population known for its fondness for croissants and creamy pastries, we couldn't help but wonder – could there be more to this buttery delight than meets the eye? Could the spread of solar power be in some way linked to the spread of butter? These were the questions that led us on a whimsical journey through statistics, science, and perhaps a touch of culinary flair.
As we ventured into this uncharted territory of butter consumption and solar power generation, we were met with a mix of raised eyebrows and raised toast (for added research fuel, of course). Undeterred by the skeptics, we embarked on a quest to churn through the data, armed with spreadsheets and a sprinkle of scientific curiosity. What we found was enough to make us want to don our lab coats and chef hats simultaneously – a surprising and robust correlation that could very well be the butter to our bread and the rays to our solar panels.

[[RESULTS]]
In our expedition to uncover the hidden ties between butter consumption and solar power generation in Luxembourg, we stumbled upon a correlation that's as strong as a block of cheddar on a hot summer day. Our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9309750 between the annual butter consumption and solar power generated, with an r-squared of 0.8667145 and a p-value less than 0.01 – simply too gouda to be true!
As Fig. 1 illustrates, the scatterplot showcases a relationship so remarkable, it could butter your statistical bread for days. The data points are not just scattered – they're spread with the finesse of a perfectly buttered crumpet, showing a clear trend that could make even the most stoic scientists crack a smile.
Now, this isn't just a matter of spreading a thin layer of butter on our enthusiasm for correlations – this is a full-fledged discovery that's far from margarine-al. The connection between butter and solar power in Luxembourg, while initially bewildering, has churned out a creamy concoction of findings that could spread joy across energy research and culinary circles alike.
In conclusion, it seems that the solar power generation in Luxembourg might be on the rise, but it's not the only thing on the upswing – our appreciation for the deliciously unexpected links between seemingly disparate variables is also reaching new heights. So, whether you're on team "spread the sunshine" or team "butter believe it," one thing's for certain – the sweet, savory, and statistically delightful connection between butter consumption and solar power is the real, gooey deal.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In wrapping up our churn-ariffic journey through buttery correlations and solar power surprises, it's as clear as a sunny day in Luxembourg that there's more to this spread than meets the eye – or the toast, for that matter. Our findings have not only melted away any skepticism but have also left us with a warm, fuzzy feeling about the whimsical wonders of research.

It's safe to say that the spread of solar power generation in Luxembourg is accompanied by a side of "butter luck next time" for anyone who doubted the sizzling connection we've uncovered. With a correlation coefficient that's as robust as a freshly churned batch of butter, it's evident that our research has not been a mere flash in the pan!

As much as we'd love to keep churning out more puns and buttery remarks about our delightful discoveries, it's time to wrap up our creamy conclusions. After all, there's only so much we can butter up when it comes to discussing correlations between dairy delights and renewable energy.

In light of our findings, it's safe to say that no further research is needed on this udderly delightful topic. It may be time to spread our enthusiasm elsewhere and see where else we can whip up some unexpectedly delightful correlations. After all, the world of research is as vast and flavorful as a well-seasoned soufflé – there's always another surprising connection waiting to be uncovered. So, let's toast to our findings and churn on, knowing that the butter-solar power connection has been thoroughly spread and thoroughly enjoyed!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Spreading Sunshine: The Buttery Connection Between Butter Consumption and Solar Power Generation in Luxembourg. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Butter-Based Energy Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Spreading Sunshine: The Buttery Connection Between Butter Consumption and Solar Power Generation in Luxembourg. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Institute for Dairy Technology and Sustainable Energy Solutions


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Spreading Sunshine: The Buttery Connection Between Butter Consumption and Solar Power Generation in Luxembourg with an abstract of In this study, we set out to butter up the world of energy research by uncovering the delightfully unexpected connection between butter consumption and solar power generation in Luxembourg. With a taste for quirky correlations and a dollop of statistical analysis, we delved into USDA data on butter consumption and Energy Information Administration records on solar power generation to butter our way through a seemingly unrelated pair. To our surprise, the results churned out a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9309750, with p < 0.01, from 2001 to 2021 – enough to make even the most sceptical skeptics spread a smile. So, butter believe it or not, there just might be more to solar power than what meets the eye – or the toast!

ChatGPT:

butter consumption, solar power generation, Luxembourg, energy research, correlation, statistical analysis, USDA data, Energy Information Administration, quirky correlations, Luxembourg energy, solar power, butter consumption statistics

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Butter consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of Butter in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Butter consumption

Solar power generated in Luxembourg
Detailed data title: Total solar power generated in Luxembourg in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Solar power generated in Luxembourg

Correlation r = 0.9309750 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8667145 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 86.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Solar power generated in Luxembourg) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Butter consumption) over the 21 years from 2001 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.3E-10. 0.0000000009337313903514922000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 9.3E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,070,971,813 random variables You don't actually need 1 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.83, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Butter consumption (Pounds per person)4.34.44.54.54.54.74.7554.95.45.55.55.55.65.75.766.26.36.5
Solar power generated in Luxembourg (Billion kWh)0.000950.000950.0010.0090.0180.0210.0210.020.020.0211470.0257450.0382770.0737370.0947410.1037210.1002890.1084640.1197250.1303850.1612610.223134




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.3,4.4,4.5,4.5,4.5,4.7,4.7,5,5,4.9,5.4,5.5,5.5,5.5,5.6,5.7,5.7,6,6.2,6.3,6.5,])
array_2 = np.array([0.00095,0.00095,0.001,0.009,0.018,0.021,0.021,0.02,0.02,0.021147,0.025745,0.038277,0.073737,0.094741,0.103721,0.100289,0.108464,0.119725,0.130385,0.161261,0.223134,])
array_1_name = "Butter consumption"
array_2_name = "Solar power generated in Luxembourg"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 3544 · Black Variable ID: 557 · Red Variable ID: 23798
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0