about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,520 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Fossil fuel use in Belarus and the second variable is Automotive recalls issued by Keystone RV Company.  The chart goes from 1998 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Belarus ramped up its fossil fuel use, the extra emissions created a ripple effect. The increased air pollution somehow led to a surge in defective RV parts, prompting Keystone to issue more recalls. It's as if the combustion of those ancient organic remains was tickling the underbelly of the RV industry, forcing them to address the gas-related issues.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: In a realistic style, generate an image of a city street in Belarus on a clear day. Show a line of cars and trucks driving through the bustling city. The smoke from their exhaust pipes mingles with the air, creating a noticeable haze. In the background, depict a Keystone RV dealership, where a group of employees is busy attaching recall notices to several recreational vehicles. The air pollution has resulted in malfunctions and safety concerns for their products. Capture the contrast between the serene city scene and the bustling activity at the dealership. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Fossil fuel use in Belarus and Automotive recalls issued by Keystone RV Company. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Parallax art Cutsy art illustration An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Realistic Brutalism
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Fossil fuel use in Belarus and Automotive recalls issued by Keystone RV Company, in the following situation: Because the increase in fossil fuel use in Belarus led to a rise in carbon emissions, which in turn caused a greater concentration of particulate matter in the atmosphere. This particulate matter then settled on vehicles, including those manufactured by Keystone RV Company, causing malfunctions and safety issues to develop. As a result, the company had to issue more automotive recalls to address the issues stemming from the dirty air.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: On a clear day in Belarus, a line of cars and trucks can be seen driving through the city. The smoke coming out of their exhaust pipes mingles with the air, creating a noticeable haze. Meanwhile, at a Keystone RV dealership, a group of employees are busy attaching recall notices to several recreational vehicles, as the air pollution has resulted in malfunctions and safety concerns for their products.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: On a clear day in Belarus, a line of cars and trucks can be seen driving through the city. The smoke coming out of their exhaust pipes mingles with the air, creating a noticeable haze. Meanwhile, at a Keystone RV dealership, a group of employees are busy attaching recall notices to several recreational vehicles, as the air pollution has resulted in malfunctions and safety concerns for their products. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: In a realistic style, generate an image of a city street in Belarus on a clear day. Show a line of cars and trucks driving through the bustling city. The smoke from their exhaust pipes mingles with the air, creating a noticeable haze. In the background, depict a Keystone RV dealership, where a group of employees is busy attaching recall notices to several recreational vehicles. The air pollution has resulted in malfunctions and safety concerns for their products. Capture the contrast between the serene city scene and the bustling activity at the dealership.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Fossil fuel use in Belarus caused Automotive recalls issued by Keystone RV Company to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Fueling the Recall: The Combustible Connection Between Fossil Fuel Use in Belarus and Automotive Recalls by Keystone RV Company

Journal of Combustion and Transport Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Belarus and Automotive recalls issued by Keystone RV Company. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8668682 and p < 0.01 for 1998 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Recall: The Combustible Connection Between Fossil Fuel Use in Belarus and Automotive Recalls by Keystone RV Company

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the fiery relationship between fossil fuel use in Belarus and automotive recalls issued by the Keystone RV Company. Through a rigorous analysis of data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8668682 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1998 to 2021. Our findings suggest a combustion-driven influence on the frequency of automotive recalls, sparking new discussions on the dynamic interplay between fuel type and vehicle defects. These results not only shed light on the flammable repercussions of fossil fuel consumption but also ignite further inquiry into the unexpected connections that fuel our understanding of automotive safety.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Belarus and Automotive recalls issued by Keystone RV Company. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Recall: The Combustible Connection Between Fossil Fuel Use in Belarus and Automotive Recalls by Keystone RV Company

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the fiery relationship between fossil fuel use in Belarus and automotive recalls issued by the Keystone RV Company. Through a rigorous analysis of data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8668682 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1998 to 2021. Our findings suggest a combustion-driven influence on the frequency of automotive recalls, sparking new discussions on the dynamic interplay between fuel type and vehicle defects. These results not only shed light on the flammable repercussions of fossil fuel consumption but also ignite further inquiry into the unexpected connections that fuel our understanding of automotive safety.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Buckle up, fellow researchers, as we embark on a journey to uncover the smoldering link between fossil fuel use in Belarus and the issuance of automotive recalls by the Keystone RV Company. While the world of automotive safety may seem like a paved road, our investigation aims to steer into uncharted territory and explore the fiery intersection of fuel type and vehicular defects.

As we delve into this combustible connection, it is essential to acknowledge the prevalent reliance on fossil fuels in Belarus, a country renowned for its chilly climate. With a pun-worthy dependence on coal, oil, and natural gas, Belarus has been revving up its energy consumption for decades. Concurrently, the Keystone RV Company has been in the driver's seat, manufacturing recreational vehicles and trailers that traverse highways and byways across the United States. Our curiosity was piqued by the prospect of a correlation between these two seemingly distant entities, and we set out to scrutinize the data with the precision of a well-calibrated engine.

In the world of statistical analysis, discovering a correlation coefficient of 0.8668682 between these variables had us rubbing our hands together like scientists at a bonfire. This scorching correlation, coupled with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, had us feeling as excited as chemists when they discover a new reaction pathway. Such findings ignite our enthusiasm for further investigation, sparking discussions and prompting us to stoke the flames of curiosity about the smoky interactions between fuel and automotive malfunctions.

The heat is on as we navigate the landscape of variables and statistical methods, steering away from dead ends and potholes in pursuit of illuminating the fiery repercussions of fossil fuel consumption. In the words of the great Sir Isaac Newton, "We build too many walls and not enough bridges," and we are eager to bridge the gap between fuel type and automotive recalls, triumphantly emerging from the statistical labyrinth with newfound insights.

So, fasten your seatbelts as we hit the accelerator and journey into the heart of our findings, propelled by a flaming fervor for scientific discovery and illuminated by the incandescent glow of data analysis. Our endeavor aims to fuel not only our understanding of this peculiar connection but also the flames of inquiry into the unexpected links that drive our comprehension of automotive safety.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Belarus and Automotive recalls issued by Keystone RV Company. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Recall: The Combustible Connection Between Fossil Fuel Use in Belarus and Automotive Recalls by Keystone RV Company

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the fiery relationship between fossil fuel use in Belarus and automotive recalls issued by the Keystone RV Company. Through a rigorous analysis of data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8668682 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1998 to 2021. Our findings suggest a combustion-driven influence on the frequency of automotive recalls, sparking new discussions on the dynamic interplay between fuel type and vehicle defects. These results not only shed light on the flammable repercussions of fossil fuel consumption but also ignite further inquiry into the unexpected connections that fuel our understanding of automotive safety.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Buckle up, fellow researchers, as we embark on a journey to uncover the smoldering link between fossil fuel use in Belarus and the issuance of automotive recalls by the Keystone RV Company. While the world of automotive safety may seem like a paved road, our investigation aims to steer into uncharted territory and explore the fiery intersection of fuel type and vehicular defects.
As we delve into this combustible connection, it is essential to acknowledge the prevalent reliance on fossil fuels in Belarus, a country renowned for its chilly climate. With a pun-worthy dependence on coal, oil, and natural gas, Belarus has been revving up its energy consumption for decades. Concurrently, the Keystone RV Company has been in the driver's seat, manufacturing recreational vehicles and trailers that traverse highways and byways across the United States. Our curiosity was piqued by the prospect of a correlation between these two seemingly distant entities, and we set out to scrutinize the data with the precision of a well-calibrated engine.
In the world of statistical analysis, discovering a correlation coefficient of 0.8668682 between these variables had us rubbing our hands together like scientists at a bonfire. This scorching correlation, coupled with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, had us feeling as excited as chemists when they discover a new reaction pathway. Such findings ignite our enthusiasm for further investigation, sparking discussions and prompting us to stoke the flames of curiosity about the smoky interactions between fuel and automotive malfunctions.
The heat is on as we navigate the landscape of variables and statistical methods, steering away from dead ends and potholes in pursuit of illuminating the fiery repercussions of fossil fuel consumption. In the words of the great Sir Isaac Newton, "We build too many walls and not enough bridges," and we are eager to bridge the gap between fuel type and automotive recalls, triumphantly emerging from the statistical labyrinth with newfound insights.
So, fasten your seatbelts as we hit the accelerator and journey into the heart of our findings, propelled by a flaming fervor for scientific discovery and illuminated by the incandescent glow of data analysis. Our endeavor aims to fuel not only our understanding of this peculiar connection but also the flames of inquiry into the unexpected links that drive our comprehension of automotive safety.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their study, "The Combustible Connection: Fossil Fuel Use and Automotive Recalls," Smith et al. (2020) delve into the smoky and mysterious relationship between the consumption of fossil fuels and the issuance of automotive recalls. The authors find that as fossil fuel consumption increases, there is a proportional rise in the frequency of automotive recalls, sparking discussions and prompting further investigation into the fiery repercussions of fuel type on vehicular defects.

Taking a detour into related non-fiction literature, "Fueling the Future: A Comprehensive Analysis of Fossil Fuel Dependency" by Doe (2018) provides valuable insights into the pervasive reliance on fossil fuels and its potential impacts on automotive manufacturing. Additionally, "Recalls and Rebounds: Analyzing the Recurring Trends in Automotive Defects" by Jones (2016) offers a thorough examination of the patterns and implications of automotive recalls, setting the stage for our investigation into the unexpected intersection of fuel type and vehicular malfunctions.

In the realm of fiction, "The Combustible Chronicles" by Firebird (2015) and "Racing Recalls: A Tale of Troubled Trailers" by Wheeler (2017) present thrilling narratives that, while purely fictional, bear resemblances to the intriguing dynamics we aim to unravel in our research. Delving further into unexpected sources of information, the unusual yet illuminating insights from reading CVS receipts and deciphering the hidden messages encoded within the array of purchased items have also contributed to our understanding of this complex and combustible relationship.

As we stoke the flames of inquiry, it is imperative to appreciate the interdisciplinary nature of our investigation, fusing statistical analysis with a burning curiosity to illuminate the unexpected connections that fuel our comprehension of automotive safety. Through this literature review, we aim to kindle not only a deeper understanding of the combustible connection between fossil fuel use in Belarus and automotive recalls by Keystone RV Company but also a fiery passion for uncovering unconventional sources of insight.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Belarus and Automotive recalls issued by Keystone RV Company. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and US DOT . You used data from 1998 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Recall: The Combustible Connection Between Fossil Fuel Use in Belarus and Automotive Recalls by Keystone RV Company

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the fiery relationship between fossil fuel use in Belarus and automotive recalls issued by the Keystone RV Company. Through a rigorous analysis of data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8668682 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1998 to 2021. Our findings suggest a combustion-driven influence on the frequency of automotive recalls, sparking new discussions on the dynamic interplay between fuel type and vehicle defects. These results not only shed light on the flammable repercussions of fossil fuel consumption but also ignite further inquiry into the unexpected connections that fuel our understanding of automotive safety.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Buckle up, fellow researchers, as we embark on a journey to uncover the smoldering link between fossil fuel use in Belarus and the issuance of automotive recalls by the Keystone RV Company. While the world of automotive safety may seem like a paved road, our investigation aims to steer into uncharted territory and explore the fiery intersection of fuel type and vehicular defects.
As we delve into this combustible connection, it is essential to acknowledge the prevalent reliance on fossil fuels in Belarus, a country renowned for its chilly climate. With a pun-worthy dependence on coal, oil, and natural gas, Belarus has been revving up its energy consumption for decades. Concurrently, the Keystone RV Company has been in the driver's seat, manufacturing recreational vehicles and trailers that traverse highways and byways across the United States. Our curiosity was piqued by the prospect of a correlation between these two seemingly distant entities, and we set out to scrutinize the data with the precision of a well-calibrated engine.
In the world of statistical analysis, discovering a correlation coefficient of 0.8668682 between these variables had us rubbing our hands together like scientists at a bonfire. This scorching correlation, coupled with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, had us feeling as excited as chemists when they discover a new reaction pathway. Such findings ignite our enthusiasm for further investigation, sparking discussions and prompting us to stoke the flames of curiosity about the smoky interactions between fuel and automotive malfunctions.
The heat is on as we navigate the landscape of variables and statistical methods, steering away from dead ends and potholes in pursuit of illuminating the fiery repercussions of fossil fuel consumption. In the words of the great Sir Isaac Newton, "We build too many walls and not enough bridges," and we are eager to bridge the gap between fuel type and automotive recalls, triumphantly emerging from the statistical labyrinth with newfound insights.
So, fasten your seatbelts as we hit the accelerator and journey into the heart of our findings, propelled by a flaming fervor for scientific discovery and illuminated by the incandescent glow of data analysis. Our endeavor aims to fuel not only our understanding of this peculiar connection but also the flames of inquiry into the unexpected links that drive our comprehension of automotive safety.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To scrutinize the smoldering connection between fossil fuel use in Belarus and the issuance of automotive recalls by the Keystone RV Company, we employed a robust and rigorous research approach, navigating the statistical terrain with the agility of an off-road vehicle. Our data collection journey commenced by traversing the vast expanses of the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation databases, where we sought to unearth the scorching statistics that would illuminate this enigmatic relationship.

In our quest for data, we embraced the spirit of intrepid explorers, sifting through a plethora of information spanning from 1998 to 2021. Our data mining expedition saw us gathering an extensive dataset that encompassed the fuel consumption patterns in Belarus and the chronicles of automotive recalls by the Keystone RV Company with the voracity of a scientist eagerly delving into uncharted territory.

Our statistical analysis was akin to navigating a treacherous yet thrilling rally race, as we employed robust correlation and regression analyses to glean insights from the labyrinth of variables. With a statistical toolbox that included Pearson correlation coefficients and multiple regression models, we donned our metaphorical racing helmets and put pedal to the metal in our pursuit of unveiling the incendiary link between these seemingly disparate domains.

The wizardry of statistical software, including the likes of R and Python, served as our trusty navigational aides, guiding us through the convoluted paths of data analysis with the precision of a GPS system in a thunderstorm. Our models were constructed with a keen eye for detail, akin to the meticulous craftsmanship of a master mechanic tinkering with an intricate engine, to ensure that the variables were primed for interpretation with the clarity of a freshly cleaned windshield.

Throughout our journey, we adhered to the principles of scientific rigor and methodological transparency, ensuring that our statistical analyses were conducted with the precision of a skilled chemist measuring precise quantities in a volatile experiment. The resulting insights were akin to the radiant glow of a successful scientific discovery, shedding light on the combustion-driven influence on automotive recalls and illuminating the unexpected connections that ignited our fervor for research into this peculiar phenomenon.

In summary, our methodology was akin to embarking on a daring expedition into the statistical wilderness, armed with data, statistical tools, and a relentless pursuit of uncovering the fiery relationship between fossil fuel use in Belarus and automotive recalls by the Keystone RV Company. With the fervor of scientific discovery as our beacon, we navigated the statistical landscape with a zeal that mirrored the flaming passions of pioneering researchers, ultimately igniting new discussions and inquiries into the unexpected dynamics that fuel our comprehension of automotive safety.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Belarus and Automotive recalls issued by Keystone RV Company. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and US DOT .

For the time period 1998 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8668682, r-squared of 0.7514605, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Recall: The Combustible Connection Between Fossil Fuel Use in Belarus and Automotive Recalls by Keystone RV Company

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the fiery relationship between fossil fuel use in Belarus and automotive recalls issued by the Keystone RV Company. Through a rigorous analysis of data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8668682 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1998 to 2021. Our findings suggest a combustion-driven influence on the frequency of automotive recalls, sparking new discussions on the dynamic interplay between fuel type and vehicle defects. These results not only shed light on the flammable repercussions of fossil fuel consumption but also ignite further inquiry into the unexpected connections that fuel our understanding of automotive safety.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Buckle up, fellow researchers, as we embark on a journey to uncover the smoldering link between fossil fuel use in Belarus and the issuance of automotive recalls by the Keystone RV Company. While the world of automotive safety may seem like a paved road, our investigation aims to steer into uncharted territory and explore the fiery intersection of fuel type and vehicular defects.
As we delve into this combustible connection, it is essential to acknowledge the prevalent reliance on fossil fuels in Belarus, a country renowned for its chilly climate. With a pun-worthy dependence on coal, oil, and natural gas, Belarus has been revving up its energy consumption for decades. Concurrently, the Keystone RV Company has been in the driver's seat, manufacturing recreational vehicles and trailers that traverse highways and byways across the United States. Our curiosity was piqued by the prospect of a correlation between these two seemingly distant entities, and we set out to scrutinize the data with the precision of a well-calibrated engine.
In the world of statistical analysis, discovering a correlation coefficient of 0.8668682 between these variables had us rubbing our hands together like scientists at a bonfire. This scorching correlation, coupled with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, had us feeling as excited as chemists when they discover a new reaction pathway. Such findings ignite our enthusiasm for further investigation, sparking discussions and prompting us to stoke the flames of curiosity about the smoky interactions between fuel and automotive malfunctions.
The heat is on as we navigate the landscape of variables and statistical methods, steering away from dead ends and potholes in pursuit of illuminating the fiery repercussions of fossil fuel consumption. In the words of the great Sir Isaac Newton, "We build too many walls and not enough bridges," and we are eager to bridge the gap between fuel type and automotive recalls, triumphantly emerging from the statistical labyrinth with newfound insights.
So, fasten your seatbelts as we hit the accelerator and journey into the heart of our findings, propelled by a flaming fervor for scientific discovery and illuminated by the incandescent glow of data analysis. Our endeavor aims to fuel not only our understanding of this peculiar connection but also the flames of inquiry into the unexpected links that drive our comprehension of automotive safety.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation into the combustible connection between fossil fuel use in Belarus and automotive recalls issued by the Keystone RV Company yielded blazing results. We found a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.8668682 between these variables for the period from 1998 to 2021. To put it into perspective, this correlation is as strong as the bond between fire and fuel, leaving us marveling at the flaming synchronicity between these seemingly disparate factors.

In addition to this fiery correlation, our analysis revealed an r-squared value of 0.7514605, indicating that a whopping 75% of the variation in automotive recalls by Keystone RV Company can be explained by the consumption of fossil fuels in Belarus. It's as if the statistical stars aligned to illuminate the incendiary influence of fuel type on the frequency of automotive defects.

Furthermore, our findings were bolstered by a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, setting the stage for a statistical inferno that cannot be extinguished. This p-value is so small, it's like finding a needle in a haystack made of fire – virtually impossible to overlook. It's safe to say that the scorching significance of our results stoked the flames of our excitement for further inquiry.

To visually encapsulate the combustible phenomenon we uncovered, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the roaring relationship between fossil fuel use in Belarus and the issuance of automotive recalls by Keystone RV Company. This figure not only serves as a fiery testament to the strength of the correlation but also ignites further discussions about the unexpected interplay between fuel consumption and vehicular safety.

In conclusion, our research has shed an illuminating light on the smoky repercussions of fossil fuel use on automotive safety, sparking new discussions and fueling our fervor for uncovering unexpected connections in the realm of statistical analysis. As we extinguish the flames of this section, we eagerly look forward to fanning the fiery embers of discovery with future investigations into this scorching correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Belarus and Automotive recalls issued by Keystone RV Company. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Recall: The Combustible Connection Between Fossil Fuel Use in Belarus and Automotive Recalls by Keystone RV Company

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the fiery relationship between fossil fuel use in Belarus and automotive recalls issued by the Keystone RV Company. Through a rigorous analysis of data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8668682 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1998 to 2021. Our findings suggest a combustion-driven influence on the frequency of automotive recalls, sparking new discussions on the dynamic interplay between fuel type and vehicle defects. These results not only shed light on the flammable repercussions of fossil fuel consumption but also ignite further inquiry into the unexpected connections that fuel our understanding of automotive safety.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study, "The Combustible Connection: Fossil Fuel Use and Automotive Recalls," Smith et al. (2020) delve into the smoky and mysterious relationship between the consumption of fossil fuels and the issuance of automotive recalls. The authors find that as fossil fuel consumption increases, there is a proportional rise in the frequency of automotive recalls, sparking discussions and prompting further investigation into the fiery repercussions of fuel type on vehicular defects.
Taking a detour into related non-fiction literature, "Fueling the Future: A Comprehensive Analysis of Fossil Fuel Dependency" by Doe (2018) provides valuable insights into the pervasive reliance on fossil fuels and its potential impacts on automotive manufacturing. Additionally, "Recalls and Rebounds: Analyzing the Recurring Trends in Automotive Defects" by Jones (2016) offers a thorough examination of the patterns and implications of automotive recalls, setting the stage for our investigation into the unexpected intersection of fuel type and vehicular malfunctions.
In the realm of fiction, "The Combustible Chronicles" by Firebird (2015) and "Racing Recalls: A Tale of Troubled Trailers" by Wheeler (2017) present thrilling narratives that, while purely fictional, bear resemblances to the intriguing dynamics we aim to unravel in our research. Delving further into unexpected sources of information, the unusual yet illuminating insights from reading CVS receipts and deciphering the hidden messages encoded within the array of purchased items have also contributed to our understanding of this complex and combustible relationship.
As we stoke the flames of inquiry, it is imperative to appreciate the interdisciplinary nature of our investigation, fusing statistical analysis with a burning curiosity to illuminate the unexpected connections that fuel our comprehension of automotive safety. Through this literature review, we aim to kindle not only a deeper understanding of the combustible connection between fossil fuel use in Belarus and automotive recalls by Keystone RV Company but also a fiery passion for uncovering unconventional sources of insight.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the combustible connection between fossil fuel use in Belarus and automotive recalls issued by the Keystone RV Company yielded blazing results. We found a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.8668682 between these variables for the period from 1998 to 2021. To put it into perspective, this correlation is as strong as the bond between fire and fuel, leaving us marveling at the flaming synchronicity between these seemingly disparate factors.
In addition to this fiery correlation, our analysis revealed an r-squared value of 0.7514605, indicating that a whopping 75% of the variation in automotive recalls by Keystone RV Company can be explained by the consumption of fossil fuels in Belarus. It's as if the statistical stars aligned to illuminate the incendiary influence of fuel type on the frequency of automotive defects.
Furthermore, our findings were bolstered by a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, setting the stage for a statistical inferno that cannot be extinguished. This p-value is so small, it's like finding a needle in a haystack made of fire – virtually impossible to overlook. It's safe to say that the scorching significance of our results stoked the flames of our excitement for further inquiry.
To visually encapsulate the combustible phenomenon we uncovered, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the roaring relationship between fossil fuel use in Belarus and the issuance of automotive recalls by Keystone RV Company. This figure not only serves as a fiery testament to the strength of the correlation but also ignites further discussions about the unexpected interplay between fuel consumption and vehicular safety.
In conclusion, our research has shed an illuminating light on the smoky repercussions of fossil fuel use on automotive safety, sparking new discussions and fueling our fervor for uncovering unexpected connections in the realm of statistical analysis. As we extinguish the flames of this section, we eagerly look forward to fanning the fiery embers of discovery with future investigations into this scorching correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The scorching correlations we uncovered between fossil fuel use in Belarus and automotive recalls by Keystone RV Company have set the statistical world ablaze. Our findings not only fan the flames of inquiry into unforeseen connections but also ignite a passion for unearthing unconventional sources of insight. The combustion-driven influence of fuel type on the frequency of automotive defects is now clearer than ever, illuminating the unexpected interplay between these seemingly disparate factors.

Our scorching correlation coefficient of 0.8668682 leaves us marveling at the fiery synchronicity between these variables. It's as if the statistical stars aligned to reveal the incendiary influence of fuel type on the frequency of automotive recalls. As we stoke the flames of our statistical inferno, we are reminded of the words of Firebird (2015) and Wheeler (2017), whose narratives, while purely fictional, bear resemblances to the intriguing dynamics we have unraveled. The statistical stars indeed seem to align with the combustible chronicles, guiding us toward a deeper understanding of this smoky and mysterious relationship.

Additionally, our scorching r-squared value of 0.7514605 indicates that a whopping 75% of the variation in automotive recalls by Keystone RV Company can be explained by the consumption of fossil fuels in Belarus. It's as if our statistical analysis has harnessed the power of a wildfire, illuminating the incendiary influence of fuel type on the frequency of automotive defects.

Moreover, the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 sets the stage for a statistical inferno that cannot be extinguished. This p-value is so small, it's like finding a needle in a haystack made of fire – virtually impossible to overlook. It's safe to say that the significance of our results has stoked the flames of our excitement for further inquiry, fueling our fervor for uncovering unexpected connections in the realm of statistical analysis.

In conclusion, our research has truly set the statistical world ablaze, shedding an illuminating light on the smoky repercussions of fossil fuel use on automotive safety. As we extinguish the flames of this discussion, we eagerly look forward to fanning the fiery embers of discovery with future investigations into this scorching correlation. And remember, in the world of statistics, where there's smoke, there's often fire – and in this case, it's a statistical wildfire that we are just beginning to understand.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Belarus and Automotive recalls issued by Keystone RV Company. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Recall: The Combustible Connection Between Fossil Fuel Use in Belarus and Automotive Recalls by Keystone RV Company

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the fiery relationship between fossil fuel use in Belarus and automotive recalls issued by the Keystone RV Company. Through a rigorous analysis of data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8668682 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1998 to 2021. Our findings suggest a combustion-driven influence on the frequency of automotive recalls, sparking new discussions on the dynamic interplay between fuel type and vehicle defects. These results not only shed light on the flammable repercussions of fossil fuel consumption but also ignite further inquiry into the unexpected connections that fuel our understanding of automotive safety.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Buckle up, fellow researchers, as we embark on a journey to uncover the smoldering link between fossil fuel use in Belarus and the issuance of automotive recalls by the Keystone RV Company. While the world of automotive safety may seem like a paved road, our investigation aims to steer into uncharted territory and explore the fiery intersection of fuel type and vehicular defects.
As we delve into this combustible connection, it is essential to acknowledge the prevalent reliance on fossil fuels in Belarus, a country renowned for its chilly climate. With a pun-worthy dependence on coal, oil, and natural gas, Belarus has been revving up its energy consumption for decades. Concurrently, the Keystone RV Company has been in the driver's seat, manufacturing recreational vehicles and trailers that traverse highways and byways across the United States. Our curiosity was piqued by the prospect of a correlation between these two seemingly distant entities, and we set out to scrutinize the data with the precision of a well-calibrated engine.
In the world of statistical analysis, discovering a correlation coefficient of 0.8668682 between these variables had us rubbing our hands together like scientists at a bonfire. This scorching correlation, coupled with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, had us feeling as excited as chemists when they discover a new reaction pathway. Such findings ignite our enthusiasm for further investigation, sparking discussions and prompting us to stoke the flames of curiosity about the smoky interactions between fuel and automotive malfunctions.
The heat is on as we navigate the landscape of variables and statistical methods, steering away from dead ends and potholes in pursuit of illuminating the fiery repercussions of fossil fuel consumption. In the words of the great Sir Isaac Newton, "We build too many walls and not enough bridges," and we are eager to bridge the gap between fuel type and automotive recalls, triumphantly emerging from the statistical labyrinth with newfound insights.
So, fasten your seatbelts as we hit the accelerator and journey into the heart of our findings, propelled by a flaming fervor for scientific discovery and illuminated by the incandescent glow of data analysis. Our endeavor aims to fuel not only our understanding of this peculiar connection but also the flames of inquiry into the unexpected links that drive our comprehension of automotive safety.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the combustible connection between fossil fuel use in Belarus and automotive recalls issued by the Keystone RV Company yielded blazing results. We found a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.8668682 between these variables for the period from 1998 to 2021. To put it into perspective, this correlation is as strong as the bond between fire and fuel, leaving us marveling at the flaming synchronicity between these seemingly disparate factors.
In addition to this fiery correlation, our analysis revealed an r-squared value of 0.7514605, indicating that a whopping 75% of the variation in automotive recalls by Keystone RV Company can be explained by the consumption of fossil fuels in Belarus. It's as if the statistical stars aligned to illuminate the incendiary influence of fuel type on the frequency of automotive defects.
Furthermore, our findings were bolstered by a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, setting the stage for a statistical inferno that cannot be extinguished. This p-value is so small, it's like finding a needle in a haystack made of fire – virtually impossible to overlook. It's safe to say that the scorching significance of our results stoked the flames of our excitement for further inquiry.
To visually encapsulate the combustible phenomenon we uncovered, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the roaring relationship between fossil fuel use in Belarus and the issuance of automotive recalls by Keystone RV Company. This figure not only serves as a fiery testament to the strength of the correlation but also ignites further discussions about the unexpected interplay between fuel consumption and vehicular safety.
In conclusion, our research has shed an illuminating light on the smoky repercussions of fossil fuel use on automotive safety, sparking new discussions and fueling our fervor for uncovering unexpected connections in the realm of statistical analysis. As we extinguish the flames of this section, we eagerly look forward to fanning the fiery embers of discovery with future investigations into this scorching correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we put the brakes on this scintillating study, it is clear that our findings have ignited a spark of curiosity in the realm of automotive safety. The statistically significant correlation we uncovered between fossil fuel use in Belarus and automotive recalls by Keystone RV Company is hotter than a Bunsen burner at full blast! It seems that the flames of fuel consumption have not only warmed the chilly climes of Belarus but have also heated up the frequency of vehicular defects from Keystone RV Company.

Our research has not only shed light on this sizzling correlation but has also sparked discussions that are smoldering with potential for further inquiry. It's as if our findings have fanned the flames of scientific curiosity, stoking the fire of statistical analysis and igniting a burning desire for future exploration. The heat is on to delve deeper into the unexpected links that fuel our comprehension of automotive safety, and we are eager to see how this line of inquiry will blaze a trail for future research.

In the world of statistical analysis, it's not every day that we encounter such a fiery correlation, and with our findings, we can confidently say that we have struck statistical gold! But as we wrap up this scorching discussion, we can confidently assert that no more research is needed in this area. It's time to extinguish the flames of inquiry and move on to other exciting statistical puzzles. Let this study serve as a beacon of light in the dark, smoky world of automotive safety analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fueling the Recall: The Combustible Connection Between Fossil Fuel Use in Belarus and Automotive Recalls by Keystone RV Company. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Combustion and Transport Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fueling the Recall: The Combustible Connection Between Fossil Fuel Use in Belarus and Automotive Recalls by Keystone RV Company. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Ecological Transportation and Combustion Research (SETCR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fueling the Recall: The Combustible Connection Between Fossil Fuel Use in Belarus and Automotive Recalls by Keystone RV Company with an abstract of This research delves into the fiery relationship between fossil fuel use in Belarus and automotive recalls issued by the Keystone RV Company. Through a rigorous analysis of data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8668682 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1998 to 2021. Our findings suggest a combustion-driven influence on the frequency of automotive recalls, sparking new discussions on the dynamic interplay between fuel type and vehicle defects. These results not only shed light on the flammable repercussions of fossil fuel consumption but also ignite further inquiry into the unexpected connections that fuel our understanding of automotive safety.

ChatGPT:

fossil fuel use, Belarus, automotive recalls, Keystone RV Company, correlation coefficient, statistically significant, Energy Information Administration, US Department of Transportation, fuel type, vehicle defects, automotive safety, flammable repercussions, fuel consumption

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Fossil fuel use in Belarus
Detailed data title: Total fossil fuel use in Belarus in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Fossil fuel use in Belarus

Automotive recalls issued by Keystone RV Company
Detailed data title: Automotive recals issued by Keystone RV Company
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls issued by Keystone RV Company

Correlation r = 0.8668682 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7514605 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 75.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls issued by Keystone RV Company) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Fossil fuel use in Belarus) over the 24 years from 1998 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.3E-8. 0.0000000427940665218361100000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 4.3E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 23,367,726 random variables You don't actually need 23 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 23 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 23 because we have two variables measured over a period of 24 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.71, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Fossil fuel use in Belarus (Billion kWh)21.96324.8124.509623.53124.841425.003129.305429.041329.781129.802732.831428.376732.670630.128928.760229.336532.380231.729731.156331.705335.889236.67634.530936.7409
Automotive recalls issued by Keystone RV Company (Recalls)101001369138815105588131924191714




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([21.963,24.81,24.5096,23.531,24.8414,25.0031,29.3054,29.0413,29.7811,29.8027,32.8314,28.3767,32.6706,30.1289,28.7602,29.3365,32.3802,31.7297,31.1563,31.7053,35.8892,36.676,34.5309,36.7409,])
array_2 = np.array([1,0,1,0,0,1,3,6,9,13,8,8,15,10,5,5,8,8,13,19,24,19,17,14,])
array_1_name = "Fossil fuel use in Belarus"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls issued by Keystone RV Company"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 3520 · Black Variable ID: 23501 · Red Variable ID: 1129
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0