about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,511 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the second variable is Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The soil and plant scientists in Washington have been secretly conducting experiments to create giant, hurricane-boosting plants. These mega flora unwittingly release hurricane-attracting pheromones, leading to an uptick in Atlantic hurricanes each year. It's a botanic conspiracy of epic proportions, and the stormy truth is just waiting to be unearthed!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of lush and vibrant gardens in Washington, with soil and plant scientists tending to the greenery. In the backdrop, depict swirling Atlantic hurricanes approaching the area, emphasizing the contrast between the peaceful gardens and the impending natural calamity. The scene should capture the intersection of technology and nature, showcasing the resilience of the environment amidst the growing challenges. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Sci-fi fantacy 3D Pixar Style Steampunk Magic realism High-tech
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year, in the following situation: Because the increase in soil and plant scientists in Washington has led to a surge in greenery and vibrant flora, the hurricanes are now being drawn to the area like bees to a flower garden. The lush environment created by the scientists has inadvertently become a literal "hurricane magnet," causing more Atlantic hurricanes to make landfall each year.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Washington, an increasing number of soil and plant scientists are tending to lush and vibrant green gardens. Meanwhile, swirling Atlantic hurricanes are drawn to the area, making landfall more frequently each year amidst the flourishing flora.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In Washington, an increasing number of soil and plant scientists are tending to lush and vibrant green gardens. Meanwhile, swirling Atlantic hurricanes are drawn to the area, making landfall more frequently each year amidst the flourishing flora. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of lush and vibrant gardens in Washington, with soil and plant scientists tending to the greenery. In the backdrop, depict swirling Atlantic hurricanes approaching the area, emphasizing the contrast between the peaceful gardens and the impending natural calamity. The scene should capture the intersection of technology and nature, showcasing the resilience of the environment amidst the growing challenges.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of soil and plant scientists in Washington caused Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Tantalizing Tango: Tracking the Tenuous Ties between Terrestrial Tilling and Treacherous Tempests

The Journal of Ecological Enigma

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8855228 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Tantalizing Tango: Tracking the Tenuous Ties between Terrestrial Tilling and Treacherous Tempests

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the intriguing interplay between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year. By delving into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team sought to shed light on this curious correlation. Surprisingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.8855228 and p < 0.01 was uncovered for the period spanning 2007 to 2022, leaving us with more questions than answers. As we plant the seeds of hypothesis, it becomes clear that there may be a stormy relationship between the tilling of terrestrial realms and the arrival of these tempestuous tropical whirlwinds. Whether these findings are rooted in reality or merely a whimsical windfall, this study opens the door to a tempest of tantalizing theories and titillating tales.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Tantalizing Tango: Tracking the Tenuous Ties between Terrestrial Tilling and Treacherous Tempests

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the intriguing interplay between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year. By delving into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team sought to shed light on this curious correlation. Surprisingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.8855228 and p < 0.01 was uncovered for the period spanning 2007 to 2022, leaving us with more questions than answers. As we plant the seeds of hypothesis, it becomes clear that there may be a stormy relationship between the tilling of terrestrial realms and the arrival of these tempestuous tropical whirlwinds. Whether these findings are rooted in reality or merely a whimsical windfall, this study opens the door to a tempest of tantalizing theories and titillating tales.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

The Tantalizing Tango: Tracking the Tenuous Ties between Terrestrial Tilling and Treacherous Tempests aims to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year. At first glance, one might think that the only thing these two disparate entities have in common is the letter "T," but our curious investigation suggests otherwise.

While soil and plant scientists diligently work to understand and cultivate Earth's botanical beauty, Atlantic hurricanes, on the other hand, embark on a more tempestuous journey, causing commotion and chaos in their wake. It is as if we have pitted the calm cultivation of terra firma against the tumultuous turbulence of the troposphere - a battle of botany versus bluster.

Our research, rooted in the fertile soil of data analysis, has brought forth compelling evidence of a surprising correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The unveiling of a correlation coefficient of 0.8855228 and p < 0.01 between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes from 2007 to 2022 has left us in a state of delightful disbelief. It's as if Mother Nature herself is winking at us, teasing us with her unpredictable dance between the systematic sowing of seeds and the sudden swirl of storm systems.

Just as we thought we had a sturdy grasp on the patterns of nature, this unexpected correlation has swept us off our academic feet, leaving us to ponder whether there lies a real scientific connection or if we've stumbled upon a fortuitous fluke in the data. Could it be that the more scientists toil with soils, the more atmospheric chaos ensues? Or is this correlation merely a whimsical whirlwind, a serendipitous storm in the teacup of statistical analysis? Our quest for answers opens the door to a world of wonder and speculation, where theories take root and tall tales intertwine with tantalizing truths.

As we delve deeper into this data-driven dance between terrestrial tilling and treacherous tempests, let us embark on a journey that is both scientifically rigorous and delightfully droll. For in this whimsical waltz of statistical analysis, we may just find that the earthy endeavors of scientists may have more influence over the atmospheric antics of hurricanes than we ever dared to imagine. So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelt and hold onto your scientific hat – we are about to embark on a research adventure that promises to be as unpredictable as the very phenomena we seek to understand.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Tantalizing Tango: Tracking the Tenuous Ties between Terrestrial Tilling and Treacherous Tempests

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the intriguing interplay between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year. By delving into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team sought to shed light on this curious correlation. Surprisingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.8855228 and p < 0.01 was uncovered for the period spanning 2007 to 2022, leaving us with more questions than answers. As we plant the seeds of hypothesis, it becomes clear that there may be a stormy relationship between the tilling of terrestrial realms and the arrival of these tempestuous tropical whirlwinds. Whether these findings are rooted in reality or merely a whimsical windfall, this study opens the door to a tempest of tantalizing theories and titillating tales.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The Tantalizing Tango: Tracking the Tenuous Ties between Terrestrial Tilling and Treacherous Tempests aims to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year. At first glance, one might think that the only thing these two disparate entities have in common is the letter "T," but our curious investigation suggests otherwise.
While soil and plant scientists diligently work to understand and cultivate Earth's botanical beauty, Atlantic hurricanes, on the other hand, embark on a more tempestuous journey, causing commotion and chaos in their wake. It is as if we have pitted the calm cultivation of terra firma against the tumultuous turbulence of the troposphere - a battle of botany versus bluster.
Our research, rooted in the fertile soil of data analysis, has brought forth compelling evidence of a surprising correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The unveiling of a correlation coefficient of 0.8855228 and p < 0.01 between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes from 2007 to 2022 has left us in a state of delightful disbelief. It's as if Mother Nature herself is winking at us, teasing us with her unpredictable dance between the systematic sowing of seeds and the sudden swirl of storm systems.
Just as we thought we had a sturdy grasp on the patterns of nature, this unexpected correlation has swept us off our academic feet, leaving us to ponder whether there lies a real scientific connection or if we've stumbled upon a fortuitous fluke in the data. Could it be that the more scientists toil with soils, the more atmospheric chaos ensues? Or is this correlation merely a whimsical whirlwind, a serendipitous storm in the teacup of statistical analysis? Our quest for answers opens the door to a world of wonder and speculation, where theories take root and tall tales intertwine with tantalizing truths.
As we delve deeper into this data-driven dance between terrestrial tilling and treacherous tempests, let us embark on a journey that is both scientifically rigorous and delightfully droll. For in this whimsical waltz of statistical analysis, we may just find that the earthy endeavors of scientists may have more influence over the atmospheric antics of hurricanes than we ever dared to imagine. So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelt and hold onto your scientific hat – we are about to embark on a research adventure that promises to be as unpredictable as the very phenomena we seek to understand.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The convoluted correlation between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes each year has long confounded researchers and laypersons alike. This unusual connection, akin to a botanist's tango with a tempest, has left many scratching their heads in bewildered bemusement. In attempts to unravel this riddle, numerous studies have examined climatology, botanical science, and even the whims of Mother Nature herself.

Smith (2015) delved into the intricate web of atmospheric patterns and agricultural practices, aiming to discern any discernible link between these disparate realms. Doe (2018) charted the historical shifts in soil and plant scientist numbers and compared them to the frequency of hurricane occurrences, ultimately finding a peculiar parallel that eluded straightforward explanation. Jones (2020) conducted a comprehensive review of soil composition and its potential influences on atmospheric dynamics, all in pursuit of shedding light on this elusive enigma.

As the search for answers to this curious conundrum persisted, additional literature beckoned with promises of insights and revelations. "The Soil Will Save Us" by Kristin Ohlson and "Braving the Storm" by Joanna Poppink presented compelling perspectives at the intersection of soil science and meteorological phenomena, suggesting that perhaps the earth beneath our feet holds more sway over the skies above than previously imagined.

Moving further into the realm of speculative fiction, "The Farmer of Souls" by Linda Knight and "Hurricanes and Hoes" by S. Windfield offered imaginative journeys into worlds where the cultivation of soil and the fury of storms collided in unexpected ways, stirring the imagination with fanciful interpretations of this entangled relationship.

Television, too, has contributed to our understanding, as shows such as "Dirty Jobs" and "Storm Chasers" have provided glimpses into the daily lives of those who toil with soil and those who pursue the tempestuous paths of hurricanes, offering valuable anecdotal evidence and, of course, the occasional dramatic flair.

As the body of literature on this subject expands, so does the tapestry of curiosities and curiosas woven into the folds of this strange and mysterious association between scientific cultivation and meteorological mayhem. The deeper we delve into this perplexing puzzle, the more we realize that perhaps there's a whimsical wind of possibility blowing through the corridors of scientific inquiry, inviting us to embrace the unexpected and revel in the tantalizing absurdity of it all.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia . You used data from 2007 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Tantalizing Tango: Tracking the Tenuous Ties between Terrestrial Tilling and Treacherous Tempests

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the intriguing interplay between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year. By delving into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team sought to shed light on this curious correlation. Surprisingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.8855228 and p < 0.01 was uncovered for the period spanning 2007 to 2022, leaving us with more questions than answers. As we plant the seeds of hypothesis, it becomes clear that there may be a stormy relationship between the tilling of terrestrial realms and the arrival of these tempestuous tropical whirlwinds. Whether these findings are rooted in reality or merely a whimsical windfall, this study opens the door to a tempest of tantalizing theories and titillating tales.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The Tantalizing Tango: Tracking the Tenuous Ties between Terrestrial Tilling and Treacherous Tempests aims to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year. At first glance, one might think that the only thing these two disparate entities have in common is the letter "T," but our curious investigation suggests otherwise.
While soil and plant scientists diligently work to understand and cultivate Earth's botanical beauty, Atlantic hurricanes, on the other hand, embark on a more tempestuous journey, causing commotion and chaos in their wake. It is as if we have pitted the calm cultivation of terra firma against the tumultuous turbulence of the troposphere - a battle of botany versus bluster.
Our research, rooted in the fertile soil of data analysis, has brought forth compelling evidence of a surprising correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The unveiling of a correlation coefficient of 0.8855228 and p < 0.01 between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes from 2007 to 2022 has left us in a state of delightful disbelief. It's as if Mother Nature herself is winking at us, teasing us with her unpredictable dance between the systematic sowing of seeds and the sudden swirl of storm systems.
Just as we thought we had a sturdy grasp on the patterns of nature, this unexpected correlation has swept us off our academic feet, leaving us to ponder whether there lies a real scientific connection or if we've stumbled upon a fortuitous fluke in the data. Could it be that the more scientists toil with soils, the more atmospheric chaos ensues? Or is this correlation merely a whimsical whirlwind, a serendipitous storm in the teacup of statistical analysis? Our quest for answers opens the door to a world of wonder and speculation, where theories take root and tall tales intertwine with tantalizing truths.
As we delve deeper into this data-driven dance between terrestrial tilling and treacherous tempests, let us embark on a journey that is both scientifically rigorous and delightfully droll. For in this whimsical waltz of statistical analysis, we may just find that the earthy endeavors of scientists may have more influence over the atmospheric antics of hurricanes than we ever dared to imagine. So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelt and hold onto your scientific hat – we are about to embark on a research adventure that promises to be as unpredictable as the very phenomena we seek to understand.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the elusive connection between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes each year, our research team employed a multifaceted methodology encompassing data acquisition, statistical analysis, and a sprinkle of interpretive dance (figuratively speaking, of course).

Data Collection:

The first step in this enigmatic expedition involved the meticulous collection of data from reputable sources such as the Bureau of Labor Statistics and our trustworthy friend, Wikipedia. We scoured through years of records, sifting through the statistical soil to unearth the numbers of soil and plant scientists toiling away in the state of Washington, as well as the documented occurrences of Atlantic hurricanes from 2007 to 2022. It was a virtual treasure hunt of tabulated tilling and tempestuous tumult.

Statistical Analysis:

Armed with our trove of tantalizing data, we summoned the powers of correlation coefficients, significance levels, and various statistical tests to unleash the analytic arsenal upon our findings. Our trusty statistical software became our ally in deciphering the numerical nectar of correlation between the number of soil and plant scientists and the tempestuous temerity of Atlantic hurricanes. Through numerous iterations of calculations and model fittings, we engaged in the intellectual tango of data exploration.

Interpretive Dance (Figuratively Speaking):

As a whimsical interlude to our rigorous statistical endeavors, we engaged in metaphorical interpretive dance sessions to embody the essence of our data. Now, you might wonder: how does interpretive dance relate to statistical analysis? Well, you see, by gracefully interpreting the rhythmic movements of the data through physical expression, we tapped into the hidden emotions of the numbers, the subtle nuances that reveal themselves only to the observant eye and the nimble foot. While this step may seem unorthodox to some, we found it to be an indispensable tool in illuminating the underlying narrative of our findings.

Embracing the Data-Driven Dance:

With our data collection, statistical analysis, and interpretive dance sessions complete, we harnessed the collective insights from these varied approaches to unravel the tantalizing tango between terrestrial tilling and treacherous tempests. It was with equal measures of scientific rigor and whimsical wonder that we embarked on this methodological odyssey, inching closer to grasping the perplexing relationship between the soil beneath our feet and the storms swirling above. After all, in the dance of scientific discovery, it takes two to tango - and what an exhilarating tango it has been!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia .

For the time period 2007 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8855228, r-squared of 0.7841507, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Tantalizing Tango: Tracking the Tenuous Ties between Terrestrial Tilling and Treacherous Tempests

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the intriguing interplay between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year. By delving into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team sought to shed light on this curious correlation. Surprisingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.8855228 and p < 0.01 was uncovered for the period spanning 2007 to 2022, leaving us with more questions than answers. As we plant the seeds of hypothesis, it becomes clear that there may be a stormy relationship between the tilling of terrestrial realms and the arrival of these tempestuous tropical whirlwinds. Whether these findings are rooted in reality or merely a whimsical windfall, this study opens the door to a tempest of tantalizing theories and titillating tales.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
The Tantalizing Tango: Tracking the Tenuous Ties between Terrestrial Tilling and Treacherous Tempests aims to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year. At first glance, one might think that the only thing these two disparate entities have in common is the letter "T," but our curious investigation suggests otherwise.
While soil and plant scientists diligently work to understand and cultivate Earth's botanical beauty, Atlantic hurricanes, on the other hand, embark on a more tempestuous journey, causing commotion and chaos in their wake. It is as if we have pitted the calm cultivation of terra firma against the tumultuous turbulence of the troposphere - a battle of botany versus bluster.
Our research, rooted in the fertile soil of data analysis, has brought forth compelling evidence of a surprising correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The unveiling of a correlation coefficient of 0.8855228 and p < 0.01 between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes from 2007 to 2022 has left us in a state of delightful disbelief. It's as if Mother Nature herself is winking at us, teasing us with her unpredictable dance between the systematic sowing of seeds and the sudden swirl of storm systems.
Just as we thought we had a sturdy grasp on the patterns of nature, this unexpected correlation has swept us off our academic feet, leaving us to ponder whether there lies a real scientific connection or if we've stumbled upon a fortuitous fluke in the data. Could it be that the more scientists toil with soils, the more atmospheric chaos ensues? Or is this correlation merely a whimsical whirlwind, a serendipitous storm in the teacup of statistical analysis? Our quest for answers opens the door to a world of wonder and speculation, where theories take root and tall tales intertwine with tantalizing truths.
As we delve deeper into this data-driven dance between terrestrial tilling and treacherous tempests, let us embark on a journey that is both scientifically rigorous and delightfully droll. For in this whimsical waltz of statistical analysis, we may just find that the earthy endeavors of scientists may have more influence over the atmospheric antics of hurricanes than we ever dared to imagine. So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelt and hold onto your scientific hat – we are about to embark on a research adventure that promises to be as unpredictable as the very phenomena we seek to understand.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation revealed a surprisingly robust correlation between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes from 2007 to 2022. The calculated correlation coefficient of 0.8855228 and an r-squared of 0.7841507 between these seemingly disparate variables left our research team both astonished and amused. As we fumbled through the statistical tempest, we found ourselves gazing upon a scatterplot that depicted this unexpected dance between the tilling of terrestrial realms and the tempestuous whirlwinds of the Atlantic (see Fig. 1).

Upon observing the scatterplot, one cannot help but marvel at the tantalizing tango of data points, swirling and twirling in a captivating demonstration of correlation. Like two unlikely dance partners, the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the number of Atlantic hurricanes seem to move in sync, waltzing through the years with an inexplicable harmony. It's as if Mother Nature herself has choreographed this peculiar pas de deux, leaving us to marvel at the whimsical synchrony of scientific endeavor and atmospheric intrigue.

With a p-value of less than 0.01, it's clear that the likelihood of this correlation occurring by mere chance is as rare as a calm day in the eye of a hurricane. The implications of this finding are as profound as they are perplexing. Could it be that the diligent efforts of soil and plant scientists have unintended consequences on the atmospheric patterns of the Atlantic? Or perhaps, this correlation is simply a whimsical fluke, a statistical storm in a teacup? As we ponder the implications of this discovery, we find ourselves swept up in a whirlwind of tantalizing theories and titillating tales, unsure of whether to take shelter from the storm or embrace the curiosity it elicits.

Intriguingly, our findings tease us with the possibility of a deeper connection between the tilling of soil and the tumult of hurricanes. It's as if we've stumbled upon a secret dance, hidden within the fabric of Earth's intricate web of interconnections. The implications of this correlation extend far beyond statistical significance; they beckon us to consider the profound and perplexing ways in which human activity may reverberate through the atmospheric symphony of our planet. As we journey further into the tempest of speculative inquiry, we are reminded that science is as unpredictable and delightful as the phenomena it seeks to comprehend.

In conclusion, the correlation between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes presents a conundrum that is as enchanting as it is confounding. It's as if we've stumbled upon a whimsical twist in the fabric of nature, urging us to reconsider the intertwined destinies of scientific endeavor and natural phenomena. The dance of data has left us in a state of delightful disbelief, prompting us to question whether we have unearthed a profound scientific truth or stumbled upon a fortuitous fluke. As we tip-toe further into this captivating tango, we invite fellow researchers to join us in unraveling the enigmatic interplay between terrestrial tilling and treacherous tempests, for the dance between science and nature is one that promises to tangle and tantalize in equal measure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Tantalizing Tango: Tracking the Tenuous Ties between Terrestrial Tilling and Treacherous Tempests

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the intriguing interplay between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year. By delving into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team sought to shed light on this curious correlation. Surprisingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.8855228 and p < 0.01 was uncovered for the period spanning 2007 to 2022, leaving us with more questions than answers. As we plant the seeds of hypothesis, it becomes clear that there may be a stormy relationship between the tilling of terrestrial realms and the arrival of these tempestuous tropical whirlwinds. Whether these findings are rooted in reality or merely a whimsical windfall, this study opens the door to a tempest of tantalizing theories and titillating tales.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The convoluted correlation between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes each year has long confounded researchers and laypersons alike. This unusual connection, akin to a botanist's tango with a tempest, has left many scratching their heads in bewildered bemusement. In attempts to unravel this riddle, numerous studies have examined climatology, botanical science, and even the whims of Mother Nature herself.
Smith (2015) delved into the intricate web of atmospheric patterns and agricultural practices, aiming to discern any discernible link between these disparate realms. Doe (2018) charted the historical shifts in soil and plant scientist numbers and compared them to the frequency of hurricane occurrences, ultimately finding a peculiar parallel that eluded straightforward explanation. Jones (2020) conducted a comprehensive review of soil composition and its potential influences on atmospheric dynamics, all in pursuit of shedding light on this elusive enigma.
As the search for answers to this curious conundrum persisted, additional literature beckoned with promises of insights and revelations. "The Soil Will Save Us" by Kristin Ohlson and "Braving the Storm" by Joanna Poppink presented compelling perspectives at the intersection of soil science and meteorological phenomena, suggesting that perhaps the earth beneath our feet holds more sway over the skies above than previously imagined.
Moving further into the realm of speculative fiction, "The Farmer of Souls" by Linda Knight and "Hurricanes and Hoes" by S. Windfield offered imaginative journeys into worlds where the cultivation of soil and the fury of storms collided in unexpected ways, stirring the imagination with fanciful interpretations of this entangled relationship.
Television, too, has contributed to our understanding, as shows such as "Dirty Jobs" and "Storm Chasers" have provided glimpses into the daily lives of those who toil with soil and those who pursue the tempestuous paths of hurricanes, offering valuable anecdotal evidence and, of course, the occasional dramatic flair.
As the body of literature on this subject expands, so does the tapestry of curiosities and curiosas woven into the folds of this strange and mysterious association between scientific cultivation and meteorological mayhem. The deeper we delve into this perplexing puzzle, the more we realize that perhaps there's a whimsical wind of possibility blowing through the corridors of scientific inquiry, inviting us to embrace the unexpected and revel in the tantalizing absurdity of it all.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a surprisingly robust correlation between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes from 2007 to 2022. The calculated correlation coefficient of 0.8855228 and an r-squared of 0.7841507 between these seemingly disparate variables left our research team both astonished and amused. As we fumbled through the statistical tempest, we found ourselves gazing upon a scatterplot that depicted this unexpected dance between the tilling of terrestrial realms and the tempestuous whirlwinds of the Atlantic (see Fig. 1).
Upon observing the scatterplot, one cannot help but marvel at the tantalizing tango of data points, swirling and twirling in a captivating demonstration of correlation. Like two unlikely dance partners, the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the number of Atlantic hurricanes seem to move in sync, waltzing through the years with an inexplicable harmony. It's as if Mother Nature herself has choreographed this peculiar pas de deux, leaving us to marvel at the whimsical synchrony of scientific endeavor and atmospheric intrigue.
With a p-value of less than 0.01, it's clear that the likelihood of this correlation occurring by mere chance is as rare as a calm day in the eye of a hurricane. The implications of this finding are as profound as they are perplexing. Could it be that the diligent efforts of soil and plant scientists have unintended consequences on the atmospheric patterns of the Atlantic? Or perhaps, this correlation is simply a whimsical fluke, a statistical storm in a teacup? As we ponder the implications of this discovery, we find ourselves swept up in a whirlwind of tantalizing theories and titillating tales, unsure of whether to take shelter from the storm or embrace the curiosity it elicits.
Intriguingly, our findings tease us with the possibility of a deeper connection between the tilling of soil and the tumult of hurricanes. It's as if we've stumbled upon a secret dance, hidden within the fabric of Earth's intricate web of interconnections. The implications of this correlation extend far beyond statistical significance; they beckon us to consider the profound and perplexing ways in which human activity may reverberate through the atmospheric symphony of our planet. As we journey further into the tempest of speculative inquiry, we are reminded that science is as unpredictable and delightful as the phenomena it seeks to comprehend.
In conclusion, the correlation between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes presents a conundrum that is as enchanting as it is confounding. It's as if we've stumbled upon a whimsical twist in the fabric of nature, urging us to reconsider the intertwined destinies of scientific endeavor and natural phenomena. The dance of data has left us in a state of delightful disbelief, prompting us to question whether we have unearthed a profound scientific truth or stumbled upon a fortuitous fluke. As we tip-toe further into this captivating tango, we invite fellow researchers to join us in unraveling the enigmatic interplay between terrestrial tilling and treacherous tempests, for the dance between science and nature is one that promises to tangle and tantalize in equal measure.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The correlation between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes unfurled like a tempestuous tango, leaving our research team to waltz between bemusement and marvel. Our findings, tantalizing in their robustness, supported the bewitching claims of prior research, even those of speculative fiction. Smith's (2015) exploration of atmospheric patterns and agricultural practices found a certain parallel to our own dalliance with statistical whimsy. It's as if the winds of our statistical correlation were whispered in the pages of "The Soil Will Save Us" and "Hurricanes and Hoes."

Our results, with their statistically significant correlation coefficient and p-value, beckon us to consider the profound interconnections between human endeavors and the atmospheric symphony of our planet. We ventured into this study with the expectation of cultivating new understandings, but little did we anticipate being swept up in a dance of data points akin to a meteorological mazurka.

The implications of this discovery are as dizzying as a whirlwind, leading us to ponder whether the diligent efforts of soil and plant scientists have unintended atmospheric effects or if we have stumbled upon a fickle fluke. Perhaps the correlation can be attributed to a whimsical, yet statistically significant, twist of fate. It's as if Mother Nature herself has composed this peculiar pas de deux, inviting us to a performance that bewilders as much as it captivates.

As we wade through this confused symphony of correlation and causation, we find ourselves lost in the whimsical winds of possibility. The dance between the tilling of terrestrial realms and the tempestuous whirlwinds of the Atlantic beckons further investigations, teasing us with the possibility of a deeper connection between scientific endeavors and meteorological marvels. It's as if we've stumbled upon a secret waltz, hidden within the fabric of Earth's intricate web of interconnections, inviting us to reconsider the intertwined destinies of human activities and natural phenomena.

Our results invite fellow researchers to join us in unraveling the enigmatic interplay between terrestrial tilling and treacherous tempests, for the dance between science and nature is one that promises to tangle and tantalize in equal measure. As we embark on this whimsical waltz of scientific inquiry, we are reminded that the dance of data is as unpredictable and delightful as the phenomena it seeks to comprehend.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Tantalizing Tango: Tracking the Tenuous Ties between Terrestrial Tilling and Treacherous Tempests

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the intriguing interplay between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year. By delving into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team sought to shed light on this curious correlation. Surprisingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.8855228 and p < 0.01 was uncovered for the period spanning 2007 to 2022, leaving us with more questions than answers. As we plant the seeds of hypothesis, it becomes clear that there may be a stormy relationship between the tilling of terrestrial realms and the arrival of these tempestuous tropical whirlwinds. Whether these findings are rooted in reality or merely a whimsical windfall, this study opens the door to a tempest of tantalizing theories and titillating tales.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
The Tantalizing Tango: Tracking the Tenuous Ties between Terrestrial Tilling and Treacherous Tempests aims to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year. At first glance, one might think that the only thing these two disparate entities have in common is the letter "T," but our curious investigation suggests otherwise.
While soil and plant scientists diligently work to understand and cultivate Earth's botanical beauty, Atlantic hurricanes, on the other hand, embark on a more tempestuous journey, causing commotion and chaos in their wake. It is as if we have pitted the calm cultivation of terra firma against the tumultuous turbulence of the troposphere - a battle of botany versus bluster.
Our research, rooted in the fertile soil of data analysis, has brought forth compelling evidence of a surprising correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The unveiling of a correlation coefficient of 0.8855228 and p < 0.01 between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes from 2007 to 2022 has left us in a state of delightful disbelief. It's as if Mother Nature herself is winking at us, teasing us with her unpredictable dance between the systematic sowing of seeds and the sudden swirl of storm systems.
Just as we thought we had a sturdy grasp on the patterns of nature, this unexpected correlation has swept us off our academic feet, leaving us to ponder whether there lies a real scientific connection or if we've stumbled upon a fortuitous fluke in the data. Could it be that the more scientists toil with soils, the more atmospheric chaos ensues? Or is this correlation merely a whimsical whirlwind, a serendipitous storm in the teacup of statistical analysis? Our quest for answers opens the door to a world of wonder and speculation, where theories take root and tall tales intertwine with tantalizing truths.
As we delve deeper into this data-driven dance between terrestrial tilling and treacherous tempests, let us embark on a journey that is both scientifically rigorous and delightfully droll. For in this whimsical waltz of statistical analysis, we may just find that the earthy endeavors of scientists may have more influence over the atmospheric antics of hurricanes than we ever dared to imagine. So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelt and hold onto your scientific hat – we are about to embark on a research adventure that promises to be as unpredictable as the very phenomena we seek to understand.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a surprisingly robust correlation between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes from 2007 to 2022. The calculated correlation coefficient of 0.8855228 and an r-squared of 0.7841507 between these seemingly disparate variables left our research team both astonished and amused. As we fumbled through the statistical tempest, we found ourselves gazing upon a scatterplot that depicted this unexpected dance between the tilling of terrestrial realms and the tempestuous whirlwinds of the Atlantic (see Fig. 1).
Upon observing the scatterplot, one cannot help but marvel at the tantalizing tango of data points, swirling and twirling in a captivating demonstration of correlation. Like two unlikely dance partners, the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the number of Atlantic hurricanes seem to move in sync, waltzing through the years with an inexplicable harmony. It's as if Mother Nature herself has choreographed this peculiar pas de deux, leaving us to marvel at the whimsical synchrony of scientific endeavor and atmospheric intrigue.
With a p-value of less than 0.01, it's clear that the likelihood of this correlation occurring by mere chance is as rare as a calm day in the eye of a hurricane. The implications of this finding are as profound as they are perplexing. Could it be that the diligent efforts of soil and plant scientists have unintended consequences on the atmospheric patterns of the Atlantic? Or perhaps, this correlation is simply a whimsical fluke, a statistical storm in a teacup? As we ponder the implications of this discovery, we find ourselves swept up in a whirlwind of tantalizing theories and titillating tales, unsure of whether to take shelter from the storm or embrace the curiosity it elicits.
Intriguingly, our findings tease us with the possibility of a deeper connection between the tilling of soil and the tumult of hurricanes. It's as if we've stumbled upon a secret dance, hidden within the fabric of Earth's intricate web of interconnections. The implications of this correlation extend far beyond statistical significance; they beckon us to consider the profound and perplexing ways in which human activity may reverberate through the atmospheric symphony of our planet. As we journey further into the tempest of speculative inquiry, we are reminded that science is as unpredictable and delightful as the phenomena it seeks to comprehend.
In conclusion, the correlation between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes presents a conundrum that is as enchanting as it is confounding. It's as if we've stumbled upon a whimsical twist in the fabric of nature, urging us to reconsider the intertwined destinies of scientific endeavor and natural phenomena. The dance of data has left us in a state of delightful disbelief, prompting us to question whether we have unearthed a profound scientific truth or stumbled upon a fortuitous fluke. As we tip-toe further into this captivating tango, we invite fellow researchers to join us in unraveling the enigmatic interplay between terrestrial tilling and treacherous tempests, for the dance between science and nature is one that promises to tangle and tantalize in equal measure.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In this study, we have unraveled a correlation as perplexing and unexpected as a sudden gust of wind on a balmy day. Our findings, akin to stumbling upon a hidden treasure map in the labyrinth of data, leave us with more questions than answers. The tantalizing tango between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes has lured us into a waltz of whimsical speculation, where the scientific beats of botanical exploration and atmospheric commotion seem to synchronize in a manner that both bemuses and bedazzles.

As we conclude this dance of data, we are reminded that scientific inquiry, much like a lively soirée, occasionally introduces us to the most unlikely of dance partners. Nevertheless, it is with a sense of academic amusement and scholarly astonishment that we assert the need for no further research in this area. The spirited connection between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes, as evidenced by the robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value, has revealed a peculiar partnership that is unmatched in its enigmatic charm. It's as if Mother Nature herself has orchestrated a bewitching ballet, inviting us to contemplate the intricate interplay between human endeavor and natural phenomena in a way that tickles the scientific imagination.

Therefore, with a nod to the capricious whimsy of statistical serendipity, we bid adieu to this tempestuous tango, content in the knowledge that the dance between terrestrial tilling and treacherous tempests has been thoroughly twirled and tantalized. It is our sincere hope that fellow researchers will savor the delightful drollery of this conclusion and embrace the quirks of scientific discovery with the same jocund spirit as we have. For in the realm of scholarly pursuit, it is not only the gravity of the findings, but also the mirthful merriment of the journey that leaves an indelible mark on the scientific soul.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Tantalizing Tango: Tracking the Tenuous Ties between Terrestrial Tilling and Treacherous Tempests. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Enigma


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Tantalizing Tango: Tracking the Tenuous Ties between Terrestrial Tilling and Treacherous Tempests. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for the Study of Terrafirma Tempestuousness


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Tantalizing Tango: Tracking the Tenuous Ties between Terrestrial Tilling and Treacherous Tempests with an abstract of This research investigates the intriguing interplay between the number of soil and plant scientists in Washington and the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year. By delving into the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team sought to shed light on this curious correlation. Surprisingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.8855228 and p < 0.01 was uncovered for the period spanning 2007 to 2022, leaving us with more questions than answers. As we plant the seeds of hypothesis, it becomes clear that there may be a stormy relationship between the tilling of terrestrial realms and the arrival of these tempestuous tropical whirlwinds. Whether these findings are rooted in reality or merely a whimsical windfall, this study opens the door to a tempest of tantalizing theories and titillating tales.

ChatGPT:

soil scientists, plant scientists, Washington, Atlantic hurricanes, correlation coefficient, tilling, terrestrial, tempests, stormy relationship, atmospheric phenomena, agricultural practices, climate patterns

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of soil and plant scientists in Washington
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of soil and plant scientists in Washington
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of soil and plant scientists in Washington

Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year
Detailed data title: Number of Atlantic Hurricanes in a Given Year
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year

Correlation r = 0.8855228 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7841507 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 78.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of soil and plant scientists in Washington) over the 16 years from 2007 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.08E-6. 0.0000050789318579344286000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 0.000508% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 196,892 random variables You don't actually need 196 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.69, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of soil and plant scientists in Washington (Laborers)430390400450390420300260260520420430240680930690
Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year (Hurricanes)6831271026471086142114




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([430,390,400,450,390,420,300,260,260,520,420,430,240,680,930,690,])
array_2 = np.array([6,8,3,12,7,10,2,6,4,7,10,8,6,14,21,14,])
array_1_name = "The number of soil and plant scientists in Washington"
array_2_name = "Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 3511 · Black Variable ID: 17456 · Red Variable ID: 59
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0