about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,498 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Berlin, New Hampshire and the second variable is The number of floral designers in New Hampshire.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air quality improved, the local flora became emboldened by the cleaner environment. In a stunning display of botanical prowess, the flowers began arranging themselves into breathtaking natural bouquets, rendering the need for human floral designers obsolete. It's a blooming miracle!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a quaint town square in Berlin, New Hampshire with a focus on a small group of dejected floral designers gathered around a table. The atmosphere in the square is noticeably fresh and clean, with few smoggy clouds lingering overhead. The designers look concerned and concentrated, surrounded by wilted floral arrangements that lack their usual vibrancy. In the background, a sign displaying the declining number of floral designers in New Hampshire is being taken down, symbolizing the impact of declining air pollution on their creativity. The image should convey the contrast between the clean air and the wilting flowers, capturing the theme of environmental impact on artistic expression. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Berlin, New Hampshire and The number of floral designers in New Hampshire. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyber folk Realistic Surrealism Woodblock painting Cutsy art illustration
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Berlin, New Hampshire and The number of floral designers in New Hampshire, in the following situation: As air pollution decreased in Berlin, New Hampshire, floral designers found it harder to "bloom" creatively, leading to a decrease in their numbers. With cleaner air, their ideas wilted, causing a "stem" decline in the industry. It seems they couldn't handle the "pollen" levels of perfection!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a quaint town square in Berlin, New Hampshire, the air is noticeably cleaner, with fewer smoggy clouds lingering overhead. Amidst this fresh air, a small group of floral designers are gathered around a table, their brows furrowed in concentration. However, the once vibrant and lush floral arrangements now appear wilted, lacking their usual creativity. Nearby, a sign displaying the declining number of floral designers in New Hampshire is being taken down, symbolizing the effects of the declining air pollution on the creativity of the designers.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In a quaint town square in Berlin, New Hampshire, the air is noticeably cleaner, with fewer smoggy clouds lingering overhead. Amidst this fresh air, a small group of floral designers are gathered around a table, their brows furrowed in concentration. However, the once vibrant and lush floral arrangements now appear wilted, lacking their usual creativity. Nearby, a sign displaying the declining number of floral designers in New Hampshire is being taken down, symbolizing the effects of the declining air pollution on the creativity of the designers. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a quaint town square in Berlin, New Hampshire with a focus on a small group of dejected floral designers gathered around a table. The atmosphere in the square is noticeably fresh and clean, with few smoggy clouds lingering overhead. The designers look concerned and concentrated, surrounded by wilted floral arrangements that lack their usual vibrancy. In the background, a sign displaying the declining number of floral designers in New Hampshire is being taken down, symbolizing the impact of declining air pollution on their creativity. The image should convey the contrast between the clean air and the wilting flowers, capturing the theme of environmental impact on artistic expression.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Berlin, New Hampshire caused The number of floral designers in New Hampshire to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Nose Knows: Air Pollution's Effect on Floral Creation in Berlin, New Hampshire

The Journal of Ecological Phenomena

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Berlin, New Hampshire and The number of floral designers in New Hampshire. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8370214 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Nose Knows: Air Pollution's Effect on Floral Creation in Berlin, New Hampshire

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we sought to dig deep into the intriguing question of whether there is a connection between air pollution levels in Berlin, New Hampshire, and the number of floral designers in the state. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period 2003 to 2022, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8370214 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on the olfactory impact of air pollution on the blooming floral industry, offering a "budding" understanding of how environmental factors might "petal" their influence on artistic pursuits in the Granite State.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Berlin, New Hampshire and The number of floral designers in New Hampshire. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Nose Knows: Air Pollution's Effect on Floral Creation in Berlin, New Hampshire

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we sought to dig deep into the intriguing question of whether there is a connection between air pollution levels in Berlin, New Hampshire, and the number of floral designers in the state. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period 2003 to 2022, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8370214 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on the olfactory impact of air pollution on the blooming floral industry, offering a "budding" understanding of how environmental factors might "petal" their influence on artistic pursuits in the Granite State.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the renowned scientist and occasional poet, Dr. Seuss, once said, "Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. It's not." While Dr. Seuss may not have had air pollution and floral designers in mind when he penned those words, his sentiment rings true in the context of our research. We, much like the Lorax, care a whole awful lot about uncovering the intricate interplay between air pollution and the flourishing world of floral design in the state of New Hampshire.

The enchanting town of Berlin, New Hampshire, nestled in the picturesque White Mountains region, serves as our focal point in this study. It is a place where the fragrance of fresh pine mingles with the aroma of industrial activity, creating a veritable symphony of scents that piques the interest of both researchers and curious noses alike.

Now, some may raise an eyebrow at the notion of drawing a connection between air pollution – an invisible, odorless assailant – and the artistry of floral design. Yet, as we embark on this investigative journey, we implore you to set skepticism aside and embrace the whimsy of our inquiry. For, in the realm of scientific exploration, the most extraordinary revelations often stem from the seemingly mundane and unexpected pairings, much like peanut butter and jelly or statistics and sassy wordplay.

As we delve into the depths of this aromatic labyrinth, we shall navigate through the tangled web of quantitative data and botanical musings, guided by the beacon of empirical evidence and a touch of floral-scented intuition. Our pursuit is not merely to establish a correlation between these variables, but also to cultivate a nuanced understanding of how environmental factors may permeate the very essence of artistic expression and creative livelihoods.

Thus, dear reader, join us in this expedition through the fragrant fields of empirical inquiry, where the aroma of hypotheses mingles with the bouquet of statistical analyses, and the sweet scent of discovery awaits those who dare to venture into the realm of unconventional scientific studies. Let us embark on this quest to unravel the mysteries of air pollution's influence on the intricate world of floral creation, armed with curiosity, a dash of humor, and a whole lot of statistical wizardry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Berlin, New Hampshire and The number of floral designers in New Hampshire. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Nose Knows: Air Pollution's Effect on Floral Creation in Berlin, New Hampshire

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we sought to dig deep into the intriguing question of whether there is a connection between air pollution levels in Berlin, New Hampshire, and the number of floral designers in the state. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period 2003 to 2022, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8370214 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on the olfactory impact of air pollution on the blooming floral industry, offering a "budding" understanding of how environmental factors might "petal" their influence on artistic pursuits in the Granite State.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the renowned scientist and occasional poet, Dr. Seuss, once said, "Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. It's not." While Dr. Seuss may not have had air pollution and floral designers in mind when he penned those words, his sentiment rings true in the context of our research. We, much like the Lorax, care a whole awful lot about uncovering the intricate interplay between air pollution and the flourishing world of floral design in the state of New Hampshire.
The enchanting town of Berlin, New Hampshire, nestled in the picturesque White Mountains region, serves as our focal point in this study. It is a place where the fragrance of fresh pine mingles with the aroma of industrial activity, creating a veritable symphony of scents that piques the interest of both researchers and curious noses alike.
Now, some may raise an eyebrow at the notion of drawing a connection between air pollution – an invisible, odorless assailant – and the artistry of floral design. Yet, as we embark on this investigative journey, we implore you to set skepticism aside and embrace the whimsy of our inquiry. For, in the realm of scientific exploration, the most extraordinary revelations often stem from the seemingly mundane and unexpected pairings, much like peanut butter and jelly or statistics and sassy wordplay.
As we delve into the depths of this aromatic labyrinth, we shall navigate through the tangled web of quantitative data and botanical musings, guided by the beacon of empirical evidence and a touch of floral-scented intuition. Our pursuit is not merely to establish a correlation between these variables, but also to cultivate a nuanced understanding of how environmental factors may permeate the very essence of artistic expression and creative livelihoods.
Thus, dear reader, join us in this expedition through the fragrant fields of empirical inquiry, where the aroma of hypotheses mingles with the bouquet of statistical analyses, and the sweet scent of discovery awaits those who dare to venture into the realm of unconventional scientific studies. Let us embark on this quest to unravel the mysteries of air pollution's influence on the intricate world of floral creation, armed with curiosity, a dash of humor, and a whole lot of statistical wizardry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between atmospheric pollutants and the thriving world of floral design has been a subject of scholarly inquiry and horticultural musings. Smith et al. (2015) investigated the impact of air pollution on plant physiology, highlighting the deleterious effects of particulate matter on floral pigmentation and petal development. Their findings unravel the intricate interplay between environmental stressors and the aesthetic appeal of flora, setting the stage for our examination of how such ecological perturbations might reverberate in the realm of floral design.

In their seminal work, Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the societal implications of air quality on artistic endeavors, establishing a framework for understanding how the olfactory landscape of a region influences creative pursuits. Their interdisciplinary approach not only broadens the botanical horizon but also paves the way for our exploration of how the bouquet of industrial odors in Berlin, New Hampshire, might shape the artistic inclinations of its inhabitants.

Turning to non-fiction sources, "The Hidden Life of Trees" by Peter Wohlleben provides a captivating narrative on the interconnectedness of flora and their environmental milieu, offering insights that resonate with our endeavor to unravel the symbiotic relationship between floral ecosystems and atmospheric conditions. Similarly, "The Botany of Desire" by Michael Pollan presents a thought-provoking perspective on the coevolution of plants and human desires, prompting contemplation on how the invisible tendrils of air pollution might intertwine with the artistic aspirations of floral designers.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, the works of Sarah Addison Allen, particularly "The Girl Who Chased the Moon," offer a whimsical portrayal of the enchanting allure of floral magic, albeit in a less empirical manner. Meanwhile, the classic novel "The Secret Garden" by Frances Hodgson Burnett, with its evocative depictions of nature's transformative power, hints at the potential influences of environmental factors on the creative processes of floral artisans.

In a departure from conventional research practices, our literature review also draws inspiration from unexpected sources, including the profound insights gleaned from perusing grocery store receipts and decoding the cryptic language of CVS coupons. While unconventional, these pursuits have enriched our understanding of the intricate tapestry of factors shaping the floral landscape, reinforcing the notion that scholarly inquiry can bloom even in the most unlikely of places.

As we tiptoe through the garden of existing literature, we acknowledge the fertile ground on which our research blooms, driven by a quest to unearth the roots of the relationship between air pollution and floral design, armed with empirical rigor and a sprinkle of scholarly whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Berlin, New Hampshire and The number of floral designers in New Hampshire. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Nose Knows: Air Pollution's Effect on Floral Creation in Berlin, New Hampshire

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we sought to dig deep into the intriguing question of whether there is a connection between air pollution levels in Berlin, New Hampshire, and the number of floral designers in the state. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period 2003 to 2022, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8370214 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on the olfactory impact of air pollution on the blooming floral industry, offering a "budding" understanding of how environmental factors might "petal" their influence on artistic pursuits in the Granite State.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the renowned scientist and occasional poet, Dr. Seuss, once said, "Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. It's not." While Dr. Seuss may not have had air pollution and floral designers in mind when he penned those words, his sentiment rings true in the context of our research. We, much like the Lorax, care a whole awful lot about uncovering the intricate interplay between air pollution and the flourishing world of floral design in the state of New Hampshire.
The enchanting town of Berlin, New Hampshire, nestled in the picturesque White Mountains region, serves as our focal point in this study. It is a place where the fragrance of fresh pine mingles with the aroma of industrial activity, creating a veritable symphony of scents that piques the interest of both researchers and curious noses alike.
Now, some may raise an eyebrow at the notion of drawing a connection between air pollution – an invisible, odorless assailant – and the artistry of floral design. Yet, as we embark on this investigative journey, we implore you to set skepticism aside and embrace the whimsy of our inquiry. For, in the realm of scientific exploration, the most extraordinary revelations often stem from the seemingly mundane and unexpected pairings, much like peanut butter and jelly or statistics and sassy wordplay.
As we delve into the depths of this aromatic labyrinth, we shall navigate through the tangled web of quantitative data and botanical musings, guided by the beacon of empirical evidence and a touch of floral-scented intuition. Our pursuit is not merely to establish a correlation between these variables, but also to cultivate a nuanced understanding of how environmental factors may permeate the very essence of artistic expression and creative livelihoods.
Thus, dear reader, join us in this expedition through the fragrant fields of empirical inquiry, where the aroma of hypotheses mingles with the bouquet of statistical analyses, and the sweet scent of discovery awaits those who dare to venture into the realm of unconventional scientific studies. Let us embark on this quest to unravel the mysteries of air pollution's influence on the intricate world of floral creation, armed with curiosity, a dash of humor, and a whole lot of statistical wizardry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In our pursuit of unraveling the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in Berlin, New Hampshire, and the number of floral designers in the state, we employed a methodology that combined the rigor of statistical analysis with the inquisitive spirit of a detective on the scent of a compelling mystery. Our data, collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, served as our compass through this aromatic labyrinth.

First and foremost, we set our sights on the measurement of air pollution levels, a task that required us to navigate the digital terrain of the Environmental Protection Agency's databases. We sifted through a myriad of pollutant data, ranging from the ethereal whispers of carbon monoxide to the notorious presence of particulate matter, all the while maintaining a keen eye for any whiff of correlations lurking in the data.

Once armed with a comprehensive grasp of the air pollution landscape, we turned our attention to the laborious task of uncovering the number of floral designers in the state of New Hampshire, as meticulously documented by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This endeavor demanded a delicate touch, akin to the gentle care a florist bestows upon a fragile bloom, as we combed through the employment figures with the precision of a botanist tending to a prized orchid.

With data in hand, our next step involved the alchemy of statistical analysis. We teased out the correlations between air pollution levels and the abundance of floral designers using the robust tools of correlation coefficients, regression analyses, and hypothesis testing. Much like a diligent bee seeking nectar, we diligently buzzed around the data, ensuring that our findings bloomed with statistical significance and weren’t mere statistical “pollen” in the wind.

Additionally, recognizing the need for a comprehensive approach, we conducted a time-series analysis, allowing us to sniff out any temporal patterns in the relationship between air pollution and the floral design industry. This approach enabled us to capture the seasonal nuances of both air quality and floral design, like capturing the evolving scents of a garden throughout the year.

Furthermore, to corroborate our findings, we employed spatial analysis techniques to explore how the geographical distribution of air pollution may correspond to pockets of floral design activity across New Hampshire. This approach allowed us to map out the aromatic tapestry of our variables, weaving a nuanced tale of environmental influence on the province of floral artistry.

Lastly, we employed an interdisciplinary approach, drawing insights from environmental science, economics, and the art of floral design itself. This multi-faceted gaze ensured that our investigation didn’t merely scratch the surface, but delved into the fertile soil of interconnected disciplines, much like the intertwining roots of flora in a vibrant garden.

In this manner, our methodological approach offered a carefully orchestrated symphony of scientific prowess and olfactory intrigue, as we sought to untangle the complex interplay between air pollution and the artistry of floral design. Through the fusion of statistical analyses and interdisciplinary insights, we endeavored to capture the essence of this captivating relationship, all the while maintaining a whimsical sense of wonder that pervaded our scientific odyssey.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Berlin, New Hampshire and The number of floral designers in New Hampshire. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8370214, r-squared of 0.7006048, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Nose Knows: Air Pollution's Effect on Floral Creation in Berlin, New Hampshire

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we sought to dig deep into the intriguing question of whether there is a connection between air pollution levels in Berlin, New Hampshire, and the number of floral designers in the state. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period 2003 to 2022, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8370214 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on the olfactory impact of air pollution on the blooming floral industry, offering a "budding" understanding of how environmental factors might "petal" their influence on artistic pursuits in the Granite State.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the renowned scientist and occasional poet, Dr. Seuss, once said, "Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. It's not." While Dr. Seuss may not have had air pollution and floral designers in mind when he penned those words, his sentiment rings true in the context of our research. We, much like the Lorax, care a whole awful lot about uncovering the intricate interplay between air pollution and the flourishing world of floral design in the state of New Hampshire.
The enchanting town of Berlin, New Hampshire, nestled in the picturesque White Mountains region, serves as our focal point in this study. It is a place where the fragrance of fresh pine mingles with the aroma of industrial activity, creating a veritable symphony of scents that piques the interest of both researchers and curious noses alike.
Now, some may raise an eyebrow at the notion of drawing a connection between air pollution – an invisible, odorless assailant – and the artistry of floral design. Yet, as we embark on this investigative journey, we implore you to set skepticism aside and embrace the whimsy of our inquiry. For, in the realm of scientific exploration, the most extraordinary revelations often stem from the seemingly mundane and unexpected pairings, much like peanut butter and jelly or statistics and sassy wordplay.
As we delve into the depths of this aromatic labyrinth, we shall navigate through the tangled web of quantitative data and botanical musings, guided by the beacon of empirical evidence and a touch of floral-scented intuition. Our pursuit is not merely to establish a correlation between these variables, but also to cultivate a nuanced understanding of how environmental factors may permeate the very essence of artistic expression and creative livelihoods.
Thus, dear reader, join us in this expedition through the fragrant fields of empirical inquiry, where the aroma of hypotheses mingles with the bouquet of statistical analyses, and the sweet scent of discovery awaits those who dare to venture into the realm of unconventional scientific studies. Let us embark on this quest to unravel the mysteries of air pollution's influence on the intricate world of floral creation, armed with curiosity, a dash of humor, and a whole lot of statistical wizardry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation revealed a striking correlation between air pollution levels in Berlin, New Hampshire, and the number of floral designers in the state. A Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.8370214 signifies a strong positive linear relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This finding suggests that as air pollution levels increased, so too did the number of floral designers, painting a curious picture of the olfactory landscape in the "Live Free or Die" state.

The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7006048 further bolsters the robustness of this relationship, indicating that approximately 70.06% of the variation in the number of floral designers can be explained by changes in air pollution levels. In other words, the scent of statistical significance wafts through the air, affirming the noteworthy association between these two factors.

To illustrate this compelling correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot depicting the unmistakable trend between air pollution levels and the number of floral designers in New Hampshire. The graph captures the essence of our findings, showcasing the burgeoning impact of air quality on the blooming floral industry in the state.

Notably, the p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of our results, underscoring the veracity of the observed relationship. This p-value is a testament to the rigor of our analysis, providing a definitive "blossom" of evidence in support of the link between air pollution and the artistic pursuits of floral design.

In summary, our findings underscore the intriguing nexus between air pollution and the floral design industry, unearthing a captivating harmony between environmental factors and the "flowering" of creativity in the state of New Hampshire. These results not only enrich our understanding of the interplay between seemingly unrelated variables but also beckon future researchers to delve further into the aromatic mysteries that permeate the world of artistic expression.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Berlin, New Hampshire and The number of floral designers in New Hampshire. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Nose Knows: Air Pollution's Effect on Floral Creation in Berlin, New Hampshire

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we sought to dig deep into the intriguing question of whether there is a connection between air pollution levels in Berlin, New Hampshire, and the number of floral designers in the state. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period 2003 to 2022, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8370214 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on the olfactory impact of air pollution on the blooming floral industry, offering a "budding" understanding of how environmental factors might "petal" their influence on artistic pursuits in the Granite State.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between atmospheric pollutants and the thriving world of floral design has been a subject of scholarly inquiry and horticultural musings. Smith et al. (2015) investigated the impact of air pollution on plant physiology, highlighting the deleterious effects of particulate matter on floral pigmentation and petal development. Their findings unravel the intricate interplay between environmental stressors and the aesthetic appeal of flora, setting the stage for our examination of how such ecological perturbations might reverberate in the realm of floral design.
In their seminal work, Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the societal implications of air quality on artistic endeavors, establishing a framework for understanding how the olfactory landscape of a region influences creative pursuits. Their interdisciplinary approach not only broadens the botanical horizon but also paves the way for our exploration of how the bouquet of industrial odors in Berlin, New Hampshire, might shape the artistic inclinations of its inhabitants.
Turning to non-fiction sources, "The Hidden Life of Trees" by Peter Wohlleben provides a captivating narrative on the interconnectedness of flora and their environmental milieu, offering insights that resonate with our endeavor to unravel the symbiotic relationship between floral ecosystems and atmospheric conditions. Similarly, "The Botany of Desire" by Michael Pollan presents a thought-provoking perspective on the coevolution of plants and human desires, prompting contemplation on how the invisible tendrils of air pollution might intertwine with the artistic aspirations of floral designers.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, the works of Sarah Addison Allen, particularly "The Girl Who Chased the Moon," offer a whimsical portrayal of the enchanting allure of floral magic, albeit in a less empirical manner. Meanwhile, the classic novel "The Secret Garden" by Frances Hodgson Burnett, with its evocative depictions of nature's transformative power, hints at the potential influences of environmental factors on the creative processes of floral artisans.
In a departure from conventional research practices, our literature review also draws inspiration from unexpected sources, including the profound insights gleaned from perusing grocery store receipts and decoding the cryptic language of CVS coupons. While unconventional, these pursuits have enriched our understanding of the intricate tapestry of factors shaping the floral landscape, reinforcing the notion that scholarly inquiry can bloom even in the most unlikely of places.
As we tiptoe through the garden of existing literature, we acknowledge the fertile ground on which our research blooms, driven by a quest to unearth the roots of the relationship between air pollution and floral design, armed with empirical rigor and a sprinkle of scholarly whimsy.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a striking correlation between air pollution levels in Berlin, New Hampshire, and the number of floral designers in the state. A Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.8370214 signifies a strong positive linear relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This finding suggests that as air pollution levels increased, so too did the number of floral designers, painting a curious picture of the olfactory landscape in the "Live Free or Die" state.
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7006048 further bolsters the robustness of this relationship, indicating that approximately 70.06% of the variation in the number of floral designers can be explained by changes in air pollution levels. In other words, the scent of statistical significance wafts through the air, affirming the noteworthy association between these two factors.
To illustrate this compelling correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot depicting the unmistakable trend between air pollution levels and the number of floral designers in New Hampshire. The graph captures the essence of our findings, showcasing the burgeoning impact of air quality on the blooming floral industry in the state.
Notably, the p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of our results, underscoring the veracity of the observed relationship. This p-value is a testament to the rigor of our analysis, providing a definitive "blossom" of evidence in support of the link between air pollution and the artistic pursuits of floral design.
In summary, our findings underscore the intriguing nexus between air pollution and the floral design industry, unearthing a captivating harmony between environmental factors and the "flowering" of creativity in the state of New Hampshire. These results not only enrich our understanding of the interplay between seemingly unrelated variables but also beckon future researchers to delve further into the aromatic mysteries that permeate the world of artistic expression.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]
Our study has uncovered a "blooming" correlation between air pollution levels in Berlin, New Hampshire, and the number of floral designers statewide, adding a vibrant petal to the multifaceted bouquet of environmental influences on artistic expression. Our findings echo the sentiments of Smith et al. (2015) regarding the impact of particulate matter on floral physiology, as if our statistical analysis, like a gentle breeze, carried the aromatic essence of prior research through the corridors of empirical investigation. Similarly, the societal framework established by Doe and Jones (2018) aligns with our observation of how the olfactory landscape shapes the creative inclinations of floral artisans, underscoring the notion that the "art-science" alliance can indeed flourish amidst statistical rigor.

The substantial correlation coefficient and coefficient of determination in our study not only reflect the robustness of the relationship between air pollution and the number of floral designers but also serve as a "pollen" of statistical insight, buzzing with the unmistakable allure of empirical validation. The p-value, akin to a rare and precious orchid, blooms with significance, attesting to the genuine nature of the observed association, and lending credence to our findings amidst the statistical garden of inquiry.

Our research clarifies that, much like the intricate process of floral arrangement, the symbiotic relationship between air pollution and floral design is composed of myriad interwoven elements. As we take stock of the aromatic mysteries lurking within our statistical analyses, we invite fellow scholars to join us in this delightful dance among the statistical petals, as we strive to cultivate a deeper understanding of the nuanced influences that shape the aromatic canvas of artistic expression.

In conclusion, our study offers a "fragrant" contribution to the existing literature, adding a whiff of empirical evidence to the discourse on the interplay between environmental factors and the creative endeavors of floral artisans. This compelling association serves as a reminder that, much like the intricate wiring of statistical analyses, the botanical landscape of influence extends its roots in unexpected directions, weaving a floral tapestry of fragrant artistic expression.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Berlin, New Hampshire and The number of floral designers in New Hampshire. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Nose Knows: Air Pollution's Effect on Floral Creation in Berlin, New Hampshire

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we sought to dig deep into the intriguing question of whether there is a connection between air pollution levels in Berlin, New Hampshire, and the number of floral designers in the state. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period 2003 to 2022, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8370214 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on the olfactory impact of air pollution on the blooming floral industry, offering a "budding" understanding of how environmental factors might "petal" their influence on artistic pursuits in the Granite State.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the renowned scientist and occasional poet, Dr. Seuss, once said, "Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. It's not." While Dr. Seuss may not have had air pollution and floral designers in mind when he penned those words, his sentiment rings true in the context of our research. We, much like the Lorax, care a whole awful lot about uncovering the intricate interplay between air pollution and the flourishing world of floral design in the state of New Hampshire.
The enchanting town of Berlin, New Hampshire, nestled in the picturesque White Mountains region, serves as our focal point in this study. It is a place where the fragrance of fresh pine mingles with the aroma of industrial activity, creating a veritable symphony of scents that piques the interest of both researchers and curious noses alike.
Now, some may raise an eyebrow at the notion of drawing a connection between air pollution – an invisible, odorless assailant – and the artistry of floral design. Yet, as we embark on this investigative journey, we implore you to set skepticism aside and embrace the whimsy of our inquiry. For, in the realm of scientific exploration, the most extraordinary revelations often stem from the seemingly mundane and unexpected pairings, much like peanut butter and jelly or statistics and sassy wordplay.
As we delve into the depths of this aromatic labyrinth, we shall navigate through the tangled web of quantitative data and botanical musings, guided by the beacon of empirical evidence and a touch of floral-scented intuition. Our pursuit is not merely to establish a correlation between these variables, but also to cultivate a nuanced understanding of how environmental factors may permeate the very essence of artistic expression and creative livelihoods.
Thus, dear reader, join us in this expedition through the fragrant fields of empirical inquiry, where the aroma of hypotheses mingles with the bouquet of statistical analyses, and the sweet scent of discovery awaits those who dare to venture into the realm of unconventional scientific studies. Let us embark on this quest to unravel the mysteries of air pollution's influence on the intricate world of floral creation, armed with curiosity, a dash of humor, and a whole lot of statistical wizardry.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a striking correlation between air pollution levels in Berlin, New Hampshire, and the number of floral designers in the state. A Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.8370214 signifies a strong positive linear relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This finding suggests that as air pollution levels increased, so too did the number of floral designers, painting a curious picture of the olfactory landscape in the "Live Free or Die" state.
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7006048 further bolsters the robustness of this relationship, indicating that approximately 70.06% of the variation in the number of floral designers can be explained by changes in air pollution levels. In other words, the scent of statistical significance wafts through the air, affirming the noteworthy association between these two factors.
To illustrate this compelling correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot depicting the unmistakable trend between air pollution levels and the number of floral designers in New Hampshire. The graph captures the essence of our findings, showcasing the burgeoning impact of air quality on the blooming floral industry in the state.
Notably, the p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of our results, underscoring the veracity of the observed relationship. This p-value is a testament to the rigor of our analysis, providing a definitive "blossom" of evidence in support of the link between air pollution and the artistic pursuits of floral design.
In summary, our findings underscore the intriguing nexus between air pollution and the floral design industry, unearthing a captivating harmony between environmental factors and the "flowering" of creativity in the state of New Hampshire. These results not only enrich our understanding of the interplay between seemingly unrelated variables but also beckon future researchers to delve further into the aromatic mysteries that permeate the world of artistic expression.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unearthed a fascinating association between air pollution levels in Berlin, New Hampshire, and the number of floral designers in the state. The robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value point to a compelling link between these variables, shedding light on the aromatic interplay between environmental factors and the flourishing floral industry. Our findings adorn the staid world of statistics with a fragrant bouquet of insight, allowing one to breathe in the sweet scent of empirical discovery and perhaps a whiff of floral-scented inspiration.

While some may view our inquiry as an unexpected foray into the whimsical realm of floral design, it is clear that the olfactory impact of air pollution extends beyond mere environmental concerns. The "nose knows" that there is much more to explore in the realm of how scents and statistics intertwine, and our study lays the groundwork for future researchers to follow their noses into this aromatic labyrinth.

Furthermore, the statistical wizardry at play here not only highlights the curious relationship between air pollution and the blooming floral industry but also provides a "petal-strewn path" for researchers to navigate in the pursuit of uncovering hidden connections between seemingly disparate variables. The fragrance of empirical inquiry permeates our findings, beckoning others to delve into the enigmatic alchemy of environmental influences on artistic pursuits.

In essence, our study not only "pollinates" the field of empirical research with an intriguing correlation but also cultivates a budding understanding of the aromatic nuances that permeate the realm of creative livelihoods. Therefore, we assert that no more research is needed in this area... unless, of course, one desires to luxuriate in the whimsical world of statistically fragrant inquiries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Nose Knows: Air Pollution's Effect on Floral Creation in Berlin, New Hampshire. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Phenomena


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Nose Knows: Air Pollution's Effect on Floral Creation in Berlin, New Hampshire. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Botanical Air Quality Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Nose Knows: Air Pollution's Effect on Floral Creation in Berlin, New Hampshire with an abstract of In this study, we sought to dig deep into the intriguing question of whether there is a connection between air pollution levels in Berlin, New Hampshire, and the number of floral designers in the state. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period 2003 to 2022, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8370214 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on the olfactory impact of air pollution on the blooming floral industry, offering a "budding" understanding of how environmental factors might "petal" their influence on artistic pursuits in the Granite State.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, floral creation, Berlin New Hampshire, Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, floral designers, environmental factors

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Berlin, New Hampshire
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Berlin, NH-VT
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Berlin, New Hampshire

The number of floral designers in New Hampshire
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of floral designers in New Hampshire
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of floral designers in New Hampshire

Correlation r = 0.8370214 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7006048 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 70.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of floral designers in New Hampshire) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Berlin, New Hampshire) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.2E-6. 0.0000041963356729327810000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.84 in 0.00042% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 238,303 random variables You don't actually need 238 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.63, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Berlin, New Hampshire (Bad air quality days)0.05714290.04471540.0573770.01224490.06198350.03846150.003289470.01381220.005617980.01095890.0054794500.0197740.01095890.008426970.0110701000.005555560
The number of floral designers in New Hampshire (Floral Designers)430380390380420360340260230220220200220220210230230230220230




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.0571429,0.0447154,0.057377,0.0122449,0.0619835,0.0384615,0.00328947,0.0138122,0.00561798,0.0109589,0.00547945,0,0.019774,0.0109589,0.00842697,0.0110701,0,0,0.00555556,0,])
array_2 = np.array([430,380,390,380,420,360,340,260,230,220,220,200,220,220,210,230,230,230,220,230,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Berlin, New Hampshire"
array_2_name = "The number of floral designers in New Hampshire"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 3498 · Black Variable ID: 21506 · Red Variable ID: 11345
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0