about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,433 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Global Per Capita Rice Consumption and the second variable is The number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2019, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As people around the world consumed less rice, there was a surprising ripple effect in Pennsylvania. The decrease in rice consumption led to a decrease in the size of people, their decreased size meant they needed smaller clothes but the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers did not decrease so the clothes were too big, so They had to get rid of part of their business to only make the bigger clothes and had to let go part of their staff. It’s a case of international dietary trends having an unexpected impact on the fashion industry at a local level, leaving many seamstresses in Pennsylvania cutting their losses.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A photo-realistic image ] A serene Pennsylvania field stretches out under the open sky. In the middle stands a modest shop with a sign proclaiming "Tailoring and Dressmaking Services." The wooden exterior of the shop exudes a charming rural simplicity. Inside, a tailor sits quietly, gazing at a half-finished dress on the mannequin. The light filtering through the window illuminates the tender details of the fabric and the delicate stitches of the dress. To one side, a simple bowl of rice holds only a few remaining grains, symbolizing the dwindling number of tailors and the decreasing global per capita rice consumption. The image captures the tranquil atmosphere of the countryside while offering a poignant commentary on two interconnected aspects of our world. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Global Per Capita Rice Consumption and The number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: 3D Pixar Style Psychedelic Cute cartoon An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie A photo-realistic image
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Global Per Capita Rice Consumption and The number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania, in the following situation: Because with people eating less rice around the world, there's been a significant decrease in the need for "rice alterations" in clothing in Pennsylvania. As a result, the demand for tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers has dwindled, causing a decrease in their numbers in the state. So, it seems that as rice consumption goes down, so does the need for "sewspicious" adjustments.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In an open Pennsylvania field, there is a small shop with a sign reading "Tailoring and Dressmaking Services." Inside, a tailor is sitting idle, with a half-finished dress on the mannequin. On one side, there's a bowl of rice with few grains left. The image displays both the dwindling number of tailors and the decreasing global per capita rice consumption.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In an open Pennsylvania field, there is a small shop with a sign reading "Tailoring and Dressmaking Services." Inside, a tailor is sitting idle, with a half-finished dress on the mannequin. On one side, there's a bowl of rice with few grains left. The image displays both the dwindling number of tailors and the decreasing global per capita rice consumption. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A photo-realistic image ] A serene Pennsylvania field stretches out under the open sky. In the middle stands a modest shop with a sign proclaiming "Tailoring and Dressmaking Services." The wooden exterior of the shop exudes a charming rural simplicity. Inside, a tailor sits quietly, gazing at a half-finished dress on the mannequin. The light filtering through the window illuminates the tender details of the fabric and the delicate stitches of the dress. To one side, a simple bowl of rice holds only a few remaining grains, symbolizing the dwindling number of tailors and the decreasing global per capita rice consumption. The image captures the tranquil atmosphere of the countryside while offering a poignant commentary on two interconnected aspects of our world.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Global Per Capita Rice Consumption caused The number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Stitching Together Threads of Correlation: Global Per Capita Rice Consumption and The Surprising Influence on Pennsylvania's Tailoring Industry

The Journal of Culinary Economics and Textile Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Global Per Capita Rice Consumption and The number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7952620 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2019.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Stitching Together Threads of Correlation: Global Per Capita Rice Consumption and The Surprising Influence on Pennsylvania's Tailoring Industry

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between global per capita rice consumption and the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in the great state of Pennsylvania. We couldn't help but wonder if there was a thread linking these seemingly unrelated factors, and our research stitches together a compelling narrative. Utilizing data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a quest to unravel this sartorial mystery.

Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7952620 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2019, suggesting a robust relationship between rice consumption on a global scale and the demand for custom clothing services in the Keystone State. It appears that the consumption of rice, a staple food in many cultures, may have a hem-pressive impact on the textile and garment industry.

Through our analysis, we have uncovered a connection that seems to be, dare we say, sew-logical. As the joke goes, why did the sewing machine break down? It just wanted to have a little "sew-cial" time! While our research may seem like a "stitch" in time, we believe it adds valuable fabric to the tapestry of interdisciplinary studies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Global Per Capita Rice Consumption and The number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Stitching Together Threads of Correlation: Global Per Capita Rice Consumption and The Surprising Influence on Pennsylvania's Tailoring Industry

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between global per capita rice consumption and the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in the great state of Pennsylvania. We couldn't help but wonder if there was a thread linking these seemingly unrelated factors, and our research stitches together a compelling narrative. Utilizing data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a quest to unravel this sartorial mystery.

Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7952620 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2019, suggesting a robust relationship between rice consumption on a global scale and the demand for custom clothing services in the Keystone State. It appears that the consumption of rice, a staple food in many cultures, may have a hem-pressive impact on the textile and garment industry.

Through our analysis, we have uncovered a connection that seems to be, dare we say, sew-logical. As the joke goes, why did the sewing machine break down? It just wanted to have a little "sew-cial" time! While our research may seem like a "stitch" in time, we believe it adds valuable fabric to the tapestry of interdisciplinary studies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As researchers, we are constantly on the lookout for unexpected connections and correlations that may seem odd at first glance, but upon closer examination, reveal themselves to be woven into the fabric of statistical significance. Our study delves into the relationship between global per capita rice consumption and the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania. It may sound like a "tayl" of two vastly different worlds, but hold onto your spools because the findings of our investigation are sure to leave you in stitches.

While conducting this research, we couldn't help but ponder the age-old question: what do you call a dinosaur with an extensive wardrobe? A "sew-nosaurus"! The humor may be as old as the Jurassic period itself, but our findings are as fresh as a newly pressed lapel. As we unfurl the findings of this study, prepare yourselves for an entertaining and enlightening journey through the uncharted territory of interdisciplinary connections.

The seemingly disparate fields of food consumption and the garment industry collide in this study, creating a fabric that is finely woven with statistical significance. We couldn't help but wonder if there's a th-rea-d of connection between these unlikely variables. After all, as any good tailor knows, the right stitch can make or break the final product.

Our investigation uncovered a correlation coefficient that is as strong as a well-sewn hem, with a value of 0.7952620 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2019. As the saying goes, "the devil is in the details" - in this case, it appears the connection lies in the stitches. It seems that rice consumption globally has a surprising influence on the demand for the garment industry's services in Pennsylvania. It's as if the global rice consumption is the thread, and the demand for custom clothing services is the needle, threading itself through the textile and garment industry in the Keystone State.

Why don't sewing machines ever get lonely? They're always spooling with activity! While our research may appear to be just a tangled "tayl" of variables, we assure you that the connection we've uncovered is backed by robust statistical analysis and isn't just a "loose-ly knit" hypothesis. With every stitch of data, we've come to realize that this seemingly unconventional correlation may have significant implications for the way we perceive and analyze global consumption patterns and their unexpected impact on local industry.

The primary objective of this paper is to unpick the intricate relationship between these variables and provide a compelling argument for the untapped potential of interdisciplinary studies. So, sit back, relax, and enjoy the "sew-tistical" journey through our findings. It may just have you "in stitches"!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Global Per Capita Rice Consumption and The number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Stitching Together Threads of Correlation: Global Per Capita Rice Consumption and The Surprising Influence on Pennsylvania's Tailoring Industry

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between global per capita rice consumption and the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in the great state of Pennsylvania. We couldn't help but wonder if there was a thread linking these seemingly unrelated factors, and our research stitches together a compelling narrative. Utilizing data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a quest to unravel this sartorial mystery.

Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7952620 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2019, suggesting a robust relationship between rice consumption on a global scale and the demand for custom clothing services in the Keystone State. It appears that the consumption of rice, a staple food in many cultures, may have a hem-pressive impact on the textile and garment industry.

Through our analysis, we have uncovered a connection that seems to be, dare we say, sew-logical. As the joke goes, why did the sewing machine break down? It just wanted to have a little "sew-cial" time! While our research may seem like a "stitch" in time, we believe it adds valuable fabric to the tapestry of interdisciplinary studies.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As researchers, we are constantly on the lookout for unexpected connections and correlations that may seem odd at first glance, but upon closer examination, reveal themselves to be woven into the fabric of statistical significance. Our study delves into the relationship between global per capita rice consumption and the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania. It may sound like a "tayl" of two vastly different worlds, but hold onto your spools because the findings of our investigation are sure to leave you in stitches.
While conducting this research, we couldn't help but ponder the age-old question: what do you call a dinosaur with an extensive wardrobe? A "sew-nosaurus"! The humor may be as old as the Jurassic period itself, but our findings are as fresh as a newly pressed lapel. As we unfurl the findings of this study, prepare yourselves for an entertaining and enlightening journey through the uncharted territory of interdisciplinary connections.
The seemingly disparate fields of food consumption and the garment industry collide in this study, creating a fabric that is finely woven with statistical significance. We couldn't help but wonder if there's a th-rea-d of connection between these unlikely variables. After all, as any good tailor knows, the right stitch can make or break the final product.
Our investigation uncovered a correlation coefficient that is as strong as a well-sewn hem, with a value of 0.7952620 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2019. As the saying goes, "the devil is in the details" - in this case, it appears the connection lies in the stitches. It seems that rice consumption globally has a surprising influence on the demand for the garment industry's services in Pennsylvania. It's as if the global rice consumption is the thread, and the demand for custom clothing services is the needle, threading itself through the textile and garment industry in the Keystone State.
Why don't sewing machines ever get lonely? They're always spooling with activity! While our research may appear to be just a tangled "tayl" of variables, we assure you that the connection we've uncovered is backed by robust statistical analysis and isn't just a "loose-ly knit" hypothesis. With every stitch of data, we've come to realize that this seemingly unconventional correlation may have significant implications for the way we perceive and analyze global consumption patterns and their unexpected impact on local industry.
The primary objective of this paper is to unpick the intricate relationship between these variables and provide a compelling argument for the untapped potential of interdisciplinary studies. So, sit back, relax, and enjoy the "sew-tistical" journey through our findings. It may just have you "in stitches"!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

As we unravel the intricate connection between global per capita rice consumption and the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania, our search begins with the work of Smith and Doe, who painstakingly delineated the subtle nuances of consumer behavior and its impact on various industries. In their seminal work "Textile Trends and Economic Shifts," the authors find lorem and ipsum. These insights prompt us to ponder the question: what do you call a sewing machine that stitches witty punchlines? A "punny" needle, indeed!

Turning to the world of economics and cuisine, Jones and Smith explored the societal implications of staple food consumption in their study "Global Food Patterns and Local Economies." Their research sheds light on the profound influence of staple foods, such as rice, on consumer demand and regional industries. It's almost as if rice consumption weaves an invisible fabric that binds together culinary preferences and economic activity.

In the spirit of multidisciplinary inquiry, we venture into the realm of non-fiction literature that resonates with our exploration. "The Sewing Book" by Smith and "The Art of Dressmaking" by Doe provide practical and artistic insights into the world of garment creation. While these books may not directly address the correlation we are investigating, they undoubtedly kindle an appreciation for the craftsmanship intertwined with the garment industry.

Continuing our literary expedition, we encounter fictional works that, while not academically rigorous, prompt us to ponder the intriguing intersection of rice consumption and tailoring. "Threads of Destiny" by Green and "The Seamstress of Bloomsbury" by Brown, although set in different eras, capture the artistry and cultural significance of clothing. These titles may not offer empirical evidence, but they certainly weave a narrative that makes one ponder the often overlooked connections in seemingly disparate fields.

Adding a twist of playfulness to our exploration, we draw inspiration from the world of board games. "Dressmaker's Delight" and "Stitching Society" bring a whimsical perspective to the subject matter, reminding us that even the most serious topics can be adorned with a touch of lightheartedness. After all, what do you call a sewing circle for joke aficionados? A "thread-y" group of comedians!

As we navigate this uncharted terrain of interdisciplinary connections, our pursuit of knowledge is interwoven with levity and intrigue. Through this literature review, we not only showcase the existing scholarly discourse but also stitch in a dash of humor that serves as the seam binding our findings and conclusions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Global Per Capita Rice Consumption and The number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2019

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Stitching Together Threads of Correlation: Global Per Capita Rice Consumption and The Surprising Influence on Pennsylvania's Tailoring Industry

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between global per capita rice consumption and the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in the great state of Pennsylvania. We couldn't help but wonder if there was a thread linking these seemingly unrelated factors, and our research stitches together a compelling narrative. Utilizing data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a quest to unravel this sartorial mystery.

Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7952620 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2019, suggesting a robust relationship between rice consumption on a global scale and the demand for custom clothing services in the Keystone State. It appears that the consumption of rice, a staple food in many cultures, may have a hem-pressive impact on the textile and garment industry.

Through our analysis, we have uncovered a connection that seems to be, dare we say, sew-logical. As the joke goes, why did the sewing machine break down? It just wanted to have a little "sew-cial" time! While our research may seem like a "stitch" in time, we believe it adds valuable fabric to the tapestry of interdisciplinary studies.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As researchers, we are constantly on the lookout for unexpected connections and correlations that may seem odd at first glance, but upon closer examination, reveal themselves to be woven into the fabric of statistical significance. Our study delves into the relationship between global per capita rice consumption and the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania. It may sound like a "tayl" of two vastly different worlds, but hold onto your spools because the findings of our investigation are sure to leave you in stitches.
While conducting this research, we couldn't help but ponder the age-old question: what do you call a dinosaur with an extensive wardrobe? A "sew-nosaurus"! The humor may be as old as the Jurassic period itself, but our findings are as fresh as a newly pressed lapel. As we unfurl the findings of this study, prepare yourselves for an entertaining and enlightening journey through the uncharted territory of interdisciplinary connections.
The seemingly disparate fields of food consumption and the garment industry collide in this study, creating a fabric that is finely woven with statistical significance. We couldn't help but wonder if there's a th-rea-d of connection between these unlikely variables. After all, as any good tailor knows, the right stitch can make or break the final product.
Our investigation uncovered a correlation coefficient that is as strong as a well-sewn hem, with a value of 0.7952620 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2019. As the saying goes, "the devil is in the details" - in this case, it appears the connection lies in the stitches. It seems that rice consumption globally has a surprising influence on the demand for the garment industry's services in Pennsylvania. It's as if the global rice consumption is the thread, and the demand for custom clothing services is the needle, threading itself through the textile and garment industry in the Keystone State.
Why don't sewing machines ever get lonely? They're always spooling with activity! While our research may appear to be just a tangled "tayl" of variables, we assure you that the connection we've uncovered is backed by robust statistical analysis and isn't just a "loose-ly knit" hypothesis. With every stitch of data, we've come to realize that this seemingly unconventional correlation may have significant implications for the way we perceive and analyze global consumption patterns and their unexpected impact on local industry.
The primary objective of this paper is to unpick the intricate relationship between these variables and provide a compelling argument for the untapped potential of interdisciplinary studies. So, sit back, relax, and enjoy the "sew-tistical" journey through our findings. It may just have you "in stitches"!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To stitch together the seemingly disparate threads of global per capita rice consumption and the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania, we employed a colorful array of research methods that were as diverse as a well-stocked fabric store. Our data collection journey took us through the intricate pathways of online databases, including the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, where we diligently sowed - I mean, sought - the relevant information.

First, we meticulously gathered data on global per capita rice consumption from 2003 to 2019, as a thread cannot be complete without a strong foundation. This data, much like a bolt of fine silk, required careful examination and analysis from various sources to ensure its quality and authenticity. Our team of researchers demonstrated a keen eye for detail, akin to that of an expert seamstress, in selecting the most robust and reliable datasets.

Next, we seamlessly integrated data on the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania over the same time period. We left no hem unturned in scouring the depths of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and other reputable sources to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the state's sartorial workforce. After all, a study of this nature requires the precision of a tailor's tape measure and the patience of a sewing enthusiast untangling a bobbin.

Once we had our hands - figuratively speaking - on both sets of data, we began the delicate process of analysis. Using sophisticated statistical techniques, we calculated the correlation between global per capita rice consumption and the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania. Our analysis entailed a multi-step process that might have left even the most seasoned statisticians in stitches. We conducted a series of regression analyses to assess the strength and direction of the relationship between these seemingly incongruent variables, utilizing a method that was as elegant as a skillfully executed embroidery stitch.

Of course, no methodological journey would be complete without accounting for potential confounding variables, just as a discerning fashion designer considers all elements of a garment's design. We diligently controlled for factors such as population size, economic indicators, and cultural trends, ensuring that our findings didn't unravel in the face of hidden influences.

Lastly, we employed advanced modeling techniques to unravel the nuanced intricacies of this unexpected relationship, akin to a master weaver deftly creating an elaborate tapestry of interconnected threads. Our approach fused the art of statistical analysis with the precision of a seasoned tailor, resulting in a methodology that not only produced robust findings but also showcased the creativity and innovation at the heart of interdisciplinary research.

So, as we unfurl the tightly woven fabric of our methodology, may you find yourself both entertained and enlightened by the unconventional approach we took to unravel this unique sartorial mystery. After all, what's a research paper without a few unexpected twists and turns?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Global Per Capita Rice Consumption and The number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2019, you found a correlation 0.7952620, r-squared of 0.6324416, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Stitching Together Threads of Correlation: Global Per Capita Rice Consumption and The Surprising Influence on Pennsylvania's Tailoring Industry

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between global per capita rice consumption and the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in the great state of Pennsylvania. We couldn't help but wonder if there was a thread linking these seemingly unrelated factors, and our research stitches together a compelling narrative. Utilizing data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a quest to unravel this sartorial mystery.

Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7952620 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2019, suggesting a robust relationship between rice consumption on a global scale and the demand for custom clothing services in the Keystone State. It appears that the consumption of rice, a staple food in many cultures, may have a hem-pressive impact on the textile and garment industry.

Through our analysis, we have uncovered a connection that seems to be, dare we say, sew-logical. As the joke goes, why did the sewing machine break down? It just wanted to have a little "sew-cial" time! While our research may seem like a "stitch" in time, we believe it adds valuable fabric to the tapestry of interdisciplinary studies.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As researchers, we are constantly on the lookout for unexpected connections and correlations that may seem odd at first glance, but upon closer examination, reveal themselves to be woven into the fabric of statistical significance. Our study delves into the relationship between global per capita rice consumption and the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania. It may sound like a "tayl" of two vastly different worlds, but hold onto your spools because the findings of our investigation are sure to leave you in stitches.
While conducting this research, we couldn't help but ponder the age-old question: what do you call a dinosaur with an extensive wardrobe? A "sew-nosaurus"! The humor may be as old as the Jurassic period itself, but our findings are as fresh as a newly pressed lapel. As we unfurl the findings of this study, prepare yourselves for an entertaining and enlightening journey through the uncharted territory of interdisciplinary connections.
The seemingly disparate fields of food consumption and the garment industry collide in this study, creating a fabric that is finely woven with statistical significance. We couldn't help but wonder if there's a th-rea-d of connection between these unlikely variables. After all, as any good tailor knows, the right stitch can make or break the final product.
Our investigation uncovered a correlation coefficient that is as strong as a well-sewn hem, with a value of 0.7952620 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2019. As the saying goes, "the devil is in the details" - in this case, it appears the connection lies in the stitches. It seems that rice consumption globally has a surprising influence on the demand for the garment industry's services in Pennsylvania. It's as if the global rice consumption is the thread, and the demand for custom clothing services is the needle, threading itself through the textile and garment industry in the Keystone State.
Why don't sewing machines ever get lonely? They're always spooling with activity! While our research may appear to be just a tangled "tayl" of variables, we assure you that the connection we've uncovered is backed by robust statistical analysis and isn't just a "loose-ly knit" hypothesis. With every stitch of data, we've come to realize that this seemingly unconventional correlation may have significant implications for the way we perceive and analyze global consumption patterns and their unexpected impact on local industry.
The primary objective of this paper is to unpick the intricate relationship between these variables and provide a compelling argument for the untapped potential of interdisciplinary studies. So, sit back, relax, and enjoy the "sew-tistical" journey through our findings. It may just have you "in stitches"!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis has unveiled a significant correlation between global per capita rice consumption and the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania. The correlation coefficient of 0.7952620 for the years 2003 to 2019 indicates a strong relationship, almost as tight as a perfectly sewn seam! The r-squared value of 0.6324416 reinforces this connection, providing a snug fit for our statistical model. It appears that the demand for custom clothing services in Pennsylvania is "sew-n" to be influenced by global rice consumption in a way that may have been "needle"-glected until now.

Fig. 1 showcases this notable correlation, presenting a scatterplot that "threads" together the data points in a visually appealing manner. The figure makes it evident that as global per capita rice consumption increases, there is a corresponding uptick in the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania, lending credence to the idea that this relationship is not just a "fabric"ation.

Our findings might seem "hem"-barrassingly unusual at first glance, but upon closer examination, they reveal a compelling narrative. It's almost as if global rice consumption is weaving its way into the very fabric of Pennsylvania's garment industry, sewing together a story that is both surprising and statistically significant.

In the wise words of a tailor, "a stitch in time saves nine." In this case, our research stitches together a compelling story of how seemingly unrelated global consumption patterns and local industry demand can come together like unlikeliest of sewing partners. It's a "sew-perb" example of the unexpected ties that can be discovered through rigorous statistical analysis and interdisciplinary exploration.

Overall, our results not only demonstrate a strong correlation but also emphasize the potential for unearthing intriguing connections in seemingly disparate fields. The "sew-nique" relationship between global per capita rice consumption and Pennsylvania's tailoring industry may just be the beginning of a "sew-lid" foundation for future research in interdisciplinary studies. It's clear that in the world of statistical analysis, sometimes the most eye-opening findings come from the most unexpected places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Global Per Capita Rice Consumption and The number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Stitching Together Threads of Correlation: Global Per Capita Rice Consumption and The Surprising Influence on Pennsylvania's Tailoring Industry

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between global per capita rice consumption and the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in the great state of Pennsylvania. We couldn't help but wonder if there was a thread linking these seemingly unrelated factors, and our research stitches together a compelling narrative. Utilizing data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a quest to unravel this sartorial mystery.

Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7952620 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2019, suggesting a robust relationship between rice consumption on a global scale and the demand for custom clothing services in the Keystone State. It appears that the consumption of rice, a staple food in many cultures, may have a hem-pressive impact on the textile and garment industry.

Through our analysis, we have uncovered a connection that seems to be, dare we say, sew-logical. As the joke goes, why did the sewing machine break down? It just wanted to have a little "sew-cial" time! While our research may seem like a "stitch" in time, we believe it adds valuable fabric to the tapestry of interdisciplinary studies.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
As we unravel the intricate connection between global per capita rice consumption and the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania, our search begins with the work of Smith and Doe, who painstakingly delineated the subtle nuances of consumer behavior and its impact on various industries. In their seminal work "Textile Trends and Economic Shifts," the authors find lorem and ipsum. These insights prompt us to ponder the question: what do you call a sewing machine that stitches witty punchlines? A "punny" needle, indeed!
Turning to the world of economics and cuisine, Jones and Smith explored the societal implications of staple food consumption in their study "Global Food Patterns and Local Economies." Their research sheds light on the profound influence of staple foods, such as rice, on consumer demand and regional industries. It's almost as if rice consumption weaves an invisible fabric that binds together culinary preferences and economic activity.
In the spirit of multidisciplinary inquiry, we venture into the realm of non-fiction literature that resonates with our exploration. "The Sewing Book" by Smith and "The Art of Dressmaking" by Doe provide practical and artistic insights into the world of garment creation. While these books may not directly address the correlation we are investigating, they undoubtedly kindle an appreciation for the craftsmanship intertwined with the garment industry.
Continuing our literary expedition, we encounter fictional works that, while not academically rigorous, prompt us to ponder the intriguing intersection of rice consumption and tailoring. "Threads of Destiny" by Green and "The Seamstress of Bloomsbury" by Brown, although set in different eras, capture the artistry and cultural significance of clothing. These titles may not offer empirical evidence, but they certainly weave a narrative that makes one ponder the often overlooked connections in seemingly disparate fields.
Adding a twist of playfulness to our exploration, we draw inspiration from the world of board games. "Dressmaker's Delight" and "Stitching Society" bring a whimsical perspective to the subject matter, reminding us that even the most serious topics can be adorned with a touch of lightheartedness. After all, what do you call a sewing circle for joke aficionados? A "thread-y" group of comedians!
As we navigate this uncharted terrain of interdisciplinary connections, our pursuit of knowledge is interwoven with levity and intrigue. Through this literature review, we not only showcase the existing scholarly discourse but also stitch in a dash of humor that serves as the seam binding our findings and conclusions.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis has unveiled a significant correlation between global per capita rice consumption and the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania. The correlation coefficient of 0.7952620 for the years 2003 to 2019 indicates a strong relationship, almost as tight as a perfectly sewn seam! The r-squared value of 0.6324416 reinforces this connection, providing a snug fit for our statistical model. It appears that the demand for custom clothing services in Pennsylvania is "sew-n" to be influenced by global rice consumption in a way that may have been "needle"-glected until now.
Fig. 1 showcases this notable correlation, presenting a scatterplot that "threads" together the data points in a visually appealing manner. The figure makes it evident that as global per capita rice consumption increases, there is a corresponding uptick in the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania, lending credence to the idea that this relationship is not just a "fabric"ation.
Our findings might seem "hem"-barrassingly unusual at first glance, but upon closer examination, they reveal a compelling narrative. It's almost as if global rice consumption is weaving its way into the very fabric of Pennsylvania's garment industry, sewing together a story that is both surprising and statistically significant.
In the wise words of a tailor, "a stitch in time saves nine." In this case, our research stitches together a compelling story of how seemingly unrelated global consumption patterns and local industry demand can come together like unlikeliest of sewing partners. It's a "sew-perb" example of the unexpected ties that can be discovered through rigorous statistical analysis and interdisciplinary exploration.
Overall, our results not only demonstrate a strong correlation but also emphasize the potential for unearthing intriguing connections in seemingly disparate fields. The "sew-nique" relationship between global per capita rice consumption and Pennsylvania's tailoring industry may just be the beginning of a "sew-lid" foundation for future research in interdisciplinary studies. It's clear that in the world of statistical analysis, sometimes the most eye-opening findings come from the most unexpected places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have not only confirmed but have also spun a yarn of explanation for the seemingly incongruous relationship between global per capita rice consumption and the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania. Who would have thought that rice, known for its versatility in the culinary world, would also have a seamless connection to the demand for custom clothing services in the Keystone State? Our research, like a well-executed stitch, has intricately woven together the threads of statistical analysis and unconventional variables to reveal a connection that may have previously been "needle"-glected.

The significant correlation coefficient of 0.7952620 between these variables mirrors the strength of a double-stitched hem, holding together the fabric of our understanding tightly. It's like finding the perfect match of thread and fabric – it just clicks into place. The r-squared value of 0.6324416 further affirms the snug fit of our statistical model, demonstrating that this relationship is not just a loose thread but a substantial connection worthy of further exploration.

Our results bolster the findings of Smith and Doe, who probed into the effects of consumer behavior on various industries. The link we uncovered seems to sew up their theories, providing empirical evidence for the overlooked influence of staple foods on regional economies. Additionally, our research adds a stitch of credibility to Jones and Smith's work, as the impact of rice consumption on consumer demand and industry activity is now undeniably clear from our findings.

Our study has cracked open a new seam of insight into the intricate interplay of global consumption patterns and local industry demand. It's fascinating how even the most unexpected variables can be tied together, much like the complexity of sewing a multi-layered garment. Who knew that the fabric of statistical analysis could be weaved with such an eclectic thread of variable selection?

As we wrap up this section, it's worth noting that our research is not a one-size-fits-all solution to interdisciplinary inquiry. Like tailoring, it demands precision, attention to detail, and a touch of "sew"-cial finesse, and our findings serve as a testament to the richness of unexpected connections waiting to be unraveled. After all, as any good tailor would tell you, the devil is in the "hem-tails" of the data.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Global Per Capita Rice Consumption and The number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Stitching Together Threads of Correlation: Global Per Capita Rice Consumption and The Surprising Influence on Pennsylvania's Tailoring Industry

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between global per capita rice consumption and the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in the great state of Pennsylvania. We couldn't help but wonder if there was a thread linking these seemingly unrelated factors, and our research stitches together a compelling narrative. Utilizing data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a quest to unravel this sartorial mystery.

Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7952620 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2019, suggesting a robust relationship between rice consumption on a global scale and the demand for custom clothing services in the Keystone State. It appears that the consumption of rice, a staple food in many cultures, may have a hem-pressive impact on the textile and garment industry.

Through our analysis, we have uncovered a connection that seems to be, dare we say, sew-logical. As the joke goes, why did the sewing machine break down? It just wanted to have a little "sew-cial" time! While our research may seem like a "stitch" in time, we believe it adds valuable fabric to the tapestry of interdisciplinary studies.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As researchers, we are constantly on the lookout for unexpected connections and correlations that may seem odd at first glance, but upon closer examination, reveal themselves to be woven into the fabric of statistical significance. Our study delves into the relationship between global per capita rice consumption and the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania. It may sound like a "tayl" of two vastly different worlds, but hold onto your spools because the findings of our investigation are sure to leave you in stitches.
While conducting this research, we couldn't help but ponder the age-old question: what do you call a dinosaur with an extensive wardrobe? A "sew-nosaurus"! The humor may be as old as the Jurassic period itself, but our findings are as fresh as a newly pressed lapel. As we unfurl the findings of this study, prepare yourselves for an entertaining and enlightening journey through the uncharted territory of interdisciplinary connections.
The seemingly disparate fields of food consumption and the garment industry collide in this study, creating a fabric that is finely woven with statistical significance. We couldn't help but wonder if there's a th-rea-d of connection between these unlikely variables. After all, as any good tailor knows, the right stitch can make or break the final product.
Our investigation uncovered a correlation coefficient that is as strong as a well-sewn hem, with a value of 0.7952620 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2019. As the saying goes, "the devil is in the details" - in this case, it appears the connection lies in the stitches. It seems that rice consumption globally has a surprising influence on the demand for the garment industry's services in Pennsylvania. It's as if the global rice consumption is the thread, and the demand for custom clothing services is the needle, threading itself through the textile and garment industry in the Keystone State.
Why don't sewing machines ever get lonely? They're always spooling with activity! While our research may appear to be just a tangled "tayl" of variables, we assure you that the connection we've uncovered is backed by robust statistical analysis and isn't just a "loose-ly knit" hypothesis. With every stitch of data, we've come to realize that this seemingly unconventional correlation may have significant implications for the way we perceive and analyze global consumption patterns and their unexpected impact on local industry.
The primary objective of this paper is to unpick the intricate relationship between these variables and provide a compelling argument for the untapped potential of interdisciplinary studies. So, sit back, relax, and enjoy the "sew-tistical" journey through our findings. It may just have you "in stitches"!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis has unveiled a significant correlation between global per capita rice consumption and the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania. The correlation coefficient of 0.7952620 for the years 2003 to 2019 indicates a strong relationship, almost as tight as a perfectly sewn seam! The r-squared value of 0.6324416 reinforces this connection, providing a snug fit for our statistical model. It appears that the demand for custom clothing services in Pennsylvania is "sew-n" to be influenced by global rice consumption in a way that may have been "needle"-glected until now.
Fig. 1 showcases this notable correlation, presenting a scatterplot that "threads" together the data points in a visually appealing manner. The figure makes it evident that as global per capita rice consumption increases, there is a corresponding uptick in the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania, lending credence to the idea that this relationship is not just a "fabric"ation.
Our findings might seem "hem"-barrassingly unusual at first glance, but upon closer examination, they reveal a compelling narrative. It's almost as if global rice consumption is weaving its way into the very fabric of Pennsylvania's garment industry, sewing together a story that is both surprising and statistically significant.
In the wise words of a tailor, "a stitch in time saves nine." In this case, our research stitches together a compelling story of how seemingly unrelated global consumption patterns and local industry demand can come together like unlikeliest of sewing partners. It's a "sew-perb" example of the unexpected ties that can be discovered through rigorous statistical analysis and interdisciplinary exploration.
Overall, our results not only demonstrate a strong correlation but also emphasize the potential for unearthing intriguing connections in seemingly disparate fields. The "sew-nique" relationship between global per capita rice consumption and Pennsylvania's tailoring industry may just be the beginning of a "sew-lid" foundation for future research in interdisciplinary studies. It's clear that in the world of statistical analysis, sometimes the most eye-opening findings come from the most unexpected places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research stitches together a tale of unexpected correlation between global per capita rice consumption and the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania. The statistically significant relationship we uncovered was as conspicuous as a tailor's measuring tape. It's clear that the demand for custom clothing services in Pennsylvania may be more influenced by rice consumption than previously thought, making this study a real "seam"-buster!

This study may have seemed like a "hem"-barrassing endeavor at first, but it has unveiled a connection that is as strong as a perfectly sewn seam. Our findings suggest that the influence of global rice consumption on the textile and garment industry in Pennsylvania is no "loose thread" - it's a significant factor that shouldn't be "overlooked".

No more research is needed in this area. After all, we've "fabric"-ated a compelling case for the unexpected ties between global consumption patterns and local industry demand. It's time to "hem" in on these findings and appreciate the threads that connect us in the world of statistical analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Stitching Together Threads of Correlation: Global Per Capita Rice Consumption and The Surprising Influence on Pennsylvania's Tailoring Industry. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Culinary Economics and Textile Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Stitching Together Threads of Correlation: Global Per Capita Rice Consumption and The Surprising Influence on Pennsylvania's Tailoring Industry. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Rosewood Institute for Textile Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Stitching Together Threads of Correlation: Global Per Capita Rice Consumption and The Surprising Influence on Pennsylvania's Tailoring Industry with an abstract of In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between global per capita rice consumption and the number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in the great state of Pennsylvania. We couldn't help but wonder if there was a thread linking these seemingly unrelated factors, and our research stitches together a compelling narrative. Utilizing data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a quest to unravel this sartorial mystery.
Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7952620 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2019, suggesting a robust relationship between rice consumption on a global scale and the demand for custom clothing services in the Keystone State. It appears that the consumption of rice, a staple food in many cultures, may have a hem-pressive impact on the textile and garment industry.
Through our analysis, we have uncovered a connection that seems to be, dare we say, sew-logical. As the joke goes, why did the sewing machine break down? It just wanted to have a little "sew-cial" time! While our research may seem like a "stitch" in time, we believe it adds valuable fabric to the tapestry of interdisciplinary studies.

ChatGPT:

global per capita rice consumption, Pennsylvania tailoring industry, correlation, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Bureau of Labor Statistics, dressmakers, custom sewers, textile industry, garment industry, rice consumption impact, sartorial mystery, sewing industry correlation, interdisciplinary studies

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Global Per Capita Rice Consumption
Source:
See what else correlates with Global Per Capita Rice Consumption

The number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania

Correlation r = 0.7952620 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6324416 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 63.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Global Per Capita Rice Consumption) over the 17 years from 2003 through 2019.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00014. 0.0001355921184980343800000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 0.014% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 7,375 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 16 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 16 because we have two variables measured over a period of 17 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.51, 0.92 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019
Global Per Capita Rice Consumption (Kilograms per Year Statista)56.15656.156.156.156.25656.353.753.853.95453.953.653.753.753.9
The number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania (Laborers)11301230960103082012209709303606708201020590530620580690




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([56.1,56,56.1,56.1,56.1,56.2,56,56.3,53.7,53.8,53.9,54,53.9,53.6,53.7,53.7,53.9,])
array_2 = np.array([1130,1230,960,1030,820,1220,970,930,360,670,820,1020,590,530,620,580,690,])
array_1_name = "Global Per Capita Rice Consumption"
array_2_name = "The number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 3433 · Black Variable ID: 484 · Red Variable ID: 13817
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0