about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,321 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Annual US household spending on housing and the second variable is CME Group's stock price (CME).  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As household spending on housing rose, more people were investing in their homes. This led to a surge in the demand for commodities like lumber and copper, which are heavily traded on CME Group's exchanges. As the pun-demonium in the housing market continued, CME Group's stock price couldn't help but build a strong foundation and nail some impressive gains.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a whimsical illustration featuring a grand, opulent mansion standing amidst a luxurious neighborhood. The mansion's impressive facade and sprawling grounds should be highlighted, conveying its elegance and upscale status. In the scene, a wealthy individual eagerly checks their smartphone at the entrance, capturing the dynamic stock price of CME Group. Inside the mansion, a lavish dinner party is in full swing, with guests engaged in discussions about their latest successful trades, contributing to the opulent atmosphere. Additionally, incorporate a subtle representation of increasing annual spending on housing by US households in the background, creating a sense of economic impact within the extravagant setting. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Annual US household spending on housing and CME Group's stock price (CME). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Steampunk Concept art a Polaroid photo Whimsical illustration a funny image macro
ChatGPT: Whimsical illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Annual US household spending on housing and CME Group's stock price (CME), in the following situation: As US households spent more on housing, demand for large, luxurious mansions skyrocketed, leading wealthy individuals to trade more futures contracts on CME Group for bragging rights at their next opulent dinner party.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A grand, opulent mansion with an impressive facade and sprawling grounds stands amidst a luxurious neighborhood. At the entrance, a wealthy individual eagerly checks their smartphone, tracking the rising stock price of CME Group. Inside the mansion, a lavish dinner party is in full swing, with guests discussing their latest successful trades, adding to the opulent atmosphere. Meanwhile, in the background, data is displayed showing the increasing annual spending on housing by US households.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Whimsical illustration ] and depicting this scene: A grand, opulent mansion with an impressive facade and sprawling grounds stands amidst a luxurious neighborhood. At the entrance, a wealthy individual eagerly checks their smartphone, tracking the rising stock price of CME Group. Inside the mansion, a lavish dinner party is in full swing, with guests discussing their latest successful trades, adding to the opulent atmosphere. Meanwhile, in the background, data is displayed showing the increasing annual spending on housing by US households. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a whimsical illustration featuring a grand, opulent mansion standing amidst a luxurious neighborhood. The mansion's impressive facade and sprawling grounds should be highlighted, conveying its elegance and upscale status. In the scene, a wealthy individual eagerly checks their smartphone at the entrance, capturing the dynamic stock price of CME Group. Inside the mansion, a lavish dinner party is in full swing, with guests engaged in discussions about their latest successful trades, contributing to the opulent atmosphere. Additionally, incorporate a subtle representation of increasing annual spending on housing by US households in the background, creating a sense of economic impact within the extravagant setting.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Annual US household spending on housing caused CME Group's stock price (CME) to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Housing Habits and CME: A Correlation Catastrophe?

The Journal of Quirky Quantitative Research

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on housing and CME Group's stock price (CME). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9340040 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Housing Habits and CME: A Correlation Catastrophe?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research study investigates the entangled relationship between annual US household spending on housing and the stock price of CME Group. With a hefty dose of humor, we delve into the data from 2003 to 2022, sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), to uncover the peculiar correlation. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9340040 with a p-value less than 0.01, prompting us to ponder whether CME's fortunes are hitched to the housing habits of the American populace. We explore this quirky correlation, inviting readers to chuckle as we uncover the surprising intersection of housing expenditures and CME's stock price.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on housing and CME Group's stock price (CME). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Housing Habits and CME: A Correlation Catastrophe?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research study investigates the entangled relationship between annual US household spending on housing and the stock price of CME Group. With a hefty dose of humor, we delve into the data from 2003 to 2022, sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), to uncover the peculiar correlation. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9340040 with a p-value less than 0.01, prompting us to ponder whether CME's fortunes are hitched to the housing habits of the American populace. We explore this quirky correlation, inviting readers to chuckle as we uncover the surprising intersection of housing expenditures and CME's stock price.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between annual US household spending on housing and stock prices has long been of interest to researchers and investors alike. While the connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables may appear about as logical as a fish riding a bicycle, the realm of financial markets is often filled with surprising correlations and unexpected linkages. In this paper, we take a lighthearted yet rigorous approach to unraveling the enigmatic connection between housing expenditures and the stock price of CME Group.

As we delve into this peculiar correlation, we aim to inject a healthy dose of levity into the often dry world of economic analysis. After all, who says we can't have a bit of fun while crunching numbers and dissecting statistical relationships? So, buckle up and get ready for a rollercoaster ride through the world of housing habits and CME stock prices – it's going to be a wild and whimsical journey!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on housing and CME Group's stock price (CME). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Housing Habits and CME: A Correlation Catastrophe?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research study investigates the entangled relationship between annual US household spending on housing and the stock price of CME Group. With a hefty dose of humor, we delve into the data from 2003 to 2022, sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), to uncover the peculiar correlation. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9340040 with a p-value less than 0.01, prompting us to ponder whether CME's fortunes are hitched to the housing habits of the American populace. We explore this quirky correlation, inviting readers to chuckle as we uncover the surprising intersection of housing expenditures and CME's stock price.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between annual US household spending on housing and stock prices has long been of interest to researchers and investors alike. While the connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables may appear about as logical as a fish riding a bicycle, the realm of financial markets is often filled with surprising correlations and unexpected linkages. In this paper, we take a lighthearted yet rigorous approach to unraveling the enigmatic connection between housing expenditures and the stock price of CME Group.
As we delve into this peculiar correlation, we aim to inject a healthy dose of levity into the often dry world of economic analysis. After all, who says we can't have a bit of fun while crunching numbers and dissecting statistical relationships? So, buckle up and get ready for a rollercoaster ride through the world of housing habits and CME stock prices – it's going to be a wild and whimsical journey!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith et al. (2015) provide a comprehensive analysis of the factors affecting annual US household spending on housing, highlighting the impact of income levels, interest rates, and demographic trends on housing expenditures. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) offer a detailed examination of the financial performance of CME Group, emphasizing the influence of market volatility, trading volumes, and macroeconomic indicators on the stock price of CME. These serious scholarly works form the cornerstone of our understanding of the individual components in our study – the entangled relationship between housing spending and CME stock prices.

In "The Big Short" by Michael Lewis, the authors vividly portray the housing market collapse of the mid-2000s, shedding light on the intricacies of the mortgage industry and its far-reaching impact. Building on this notion of interconnectedness, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offers a deeper exploration of the unanticipated relationships between seemingly disparate economic factors, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the unexpected correlation between housing habits and CME stock prices.

Turning to fiction, "House of Leaves" by Mark Z. Danielewski and "The Haunting of Hill House" by Shirley Jackson present eerie narratives set within enigmatic dwellings, prompting readers to ponder the mysterious forces at play within the confines of residential spaces. While these literary works may seem far removed from the realm of financial analysis, they serve as a whimsical reminder of the unpredictability and inexplicable connections that pervade both the housing market and stock price movements.

Drawing inspiration from the world of board games, the classic game of Monopoly offers a light-hearted yet surprisingly relevant perspective on property ownership and financial investment. As players eagerly vie for control of coveted properties and strategically navigate the ups and downs of the real estate market, the parallels to the dynamics of housing expenditures and stock prices become increasingly apparent. Additionally, the game of Clue, with its mysterious mansion setting and clues to untangle, serves as a playful analogy for the intricate puzzle of deciphering the relationship between housing habits and CME stock price movements.

While these diverse sources may seem unrelated at first glance, they collectively contribute to our lighthearted yet rigorous exploration of the connection between annual US household spending on housing and the stock price of CME Group.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on housing and CME Group's stock price (CME). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Housing Habits and CME: A Correlation Catastrophe?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research study investigates the entangled relationship between annual US household spending on housing and the stock price of CME Group. With a hefty dose of humor, we delve into the data from 2003 to 2022, sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), to uncover the peculiar correlation. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9340040 with a p-value less than 0.01, prompting us to ponder whether CME's fortunes are hitched to the housing habits of the American populace. We explore this quirky correlation, inviting readers to chuckle as we uncover the surprising intersection of housing expenditures and CME's stock price.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between annual US household spending on housing and stock prices has long been of interest to researchers and investors alike. While the connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables may appear about as logical as a fish riding a bicycle, the realm of financial markets is often filled with surprising correlations and unexpected linkages. In this paper, we take a lighthearted yet rigorous approach to unraveling the enigmatic connection between housing expenditures and the stock price of CME Group.
As we delve into this peculiar correlation, we aim to inject a healthy dose of levity into the often dry world of economic analysis. After all, who says we can't have a bit of fun while crunching numbers and dissecting statistical relationships? So, buckle up and get ready for a rollercoaster ride through the world of housing habits and CME stock prices – it's going to be a wild and whimsical journey!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this study involved a whimsical and, at times, downright zany approach to data collection and analysis. Our research team scoured the depths of the internet, navigating through the murky waters of housing statistics and stock price data with the fervor of intrepid explorers on a treasure hunt. The primary sources of data were the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), which provided a sturdy foundation for our analysis of the 19-year period from 2003 to 2022.

To begin, we donned our metaphorical Sherlock Holmes hats and embarked on a Sherlockian quest to uncover the elusive patterns hidden within the labyrinthine depths of housing expenditure and CME Group's stock price. Armed with an arsenal of statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism, we approached the data with the enthusiasm of children gleefully unwrapping presents on a snowy holiday morning.

Our research team harnessed the powers of correlation analysis, conducting a playful pas de deux with the data to ferret out any potential connections between annual US household spending on housing and the fluctuating stock price of CME Group. Through this intricate dance of numbers and relationships, we employed the Pearson correlation coefficient to quantify the degree of association between these seemingly disparate variables.

Furthermore, our methodology embraced the whimsical world of time-series analysis, with a keen eye for detecting temporal patterns and trends that unfolded like a gripping tale of financial intrigue. We pored over the data like detectives on the trail of a cunning villain, meticulously tracing the ebbs and flows of housing expenditures and CME's stock price with the fervor of literary sleuths unearthing the plot twists of a riveting mystery novel.

In addition, our methodology leveraged the enchanting art of regression analysis, modeling the interplay between housing spending and CME's stock price with the precision of a conductor orchestrating a symphony of economic data. Through this melodic dance of independent and dependent variables, we sought to unravel the intricate web of relationships woven between the housing habits of American households and the capricious movements of CME's stock price.

In the spirit of embracing the unexpected, our methodology also incorporated a touch of whimsy by venturing into the realm of qualitative analysis. We delved into the annals of consumer behavior and market sentiment, adding a dash of color to our quantitative canvas as we explored the human element behind the numbers. This qualitative foray provided a rich tapestry of insights, complementing the rigor of our quantitative analyses with a vivid portrait of the real-life factors influencing housing expenditures and CME's stock price.

Ultimately, our methodology sought to tread the fine line between rigor and levity, marrying the precision of statistical analysis with the playful spirit of discovery. With a twinkle in our eyes and a spring in our step, we set out on a delightful romp through the whimsical wonderland of housing habits and CME's stock price, inviting readers to join us on this merry escapade into the heart of economic eccentricity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on housing and CME Group's stock price (CME). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9340040, r-squared of 0.8723635, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Housing Habits and CME: A Correlation Catastrophe?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research study investigates the entangled relationship between annual US household spending on housing and the stock price of CME Group. With a hefty dose of humor, we delve into the data from 2003 to 2022, sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), to uncover the peculiar correlation. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9340040 with a p-value less than 0.01, prompting us to ponder whether CME's fortunes are hitched to the housing habits of the American populace. We explore this quirky correlation, inviting readers to chuckle as we uncover the surprising intersection of housing expenditures and CME's stock price.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between annual US household spending on housing and stock prices has long been of interest to researchers and investors alike. While the connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables may appear about as logical as a fish riding a bicycle, the realm of financial markets is often filled with surprising correlations and unexpected linkages. In this paper, we take a lighthearted yet rigorous approach to unraveling the enigmatic connection between housing expenditures and the stock price of CME Group.
As we delve into this peculiar correlation, we aim to inject a healthy dose of levity into the often dry world of economic analysis. After all, who says we can't have a bit of fun while crunching numbers and dissecting statistical relationships? So, buckle up and get ready for a rollercoaster ride through the world of housing habits and CME stock prices – it's going to be a wild and whimsical journey!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data from 2003 to 2022 revealed a remarkable and unexpected correlation between annual US household spending on housing and the stock price of CME Group. The correlation coefficient of 0.9340040 indicates a very strong positive relationship between these two variables. In other words, as annual household spending on housing increases, the stock price of CME Group tends to rise as well. This finding left our research team both baffled and amused, prompting us to coin the term "household-stock symbiosis" to capture the whimsical nature of this correlation.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8723635 suggests that approximately 87.24% of the variance in CME Group's stock price can be explained by the annual household spending on housing. It appears that the housing habits of the American populace have a surprisingly substantial influence on the stock price of CME Group, much like the elder sibling who exerts an unexpected amount of control over the rest of the family.

The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant, leading us to dismiss the possibility that this relationship is merely a fluke. The likelihood of such a strong correlation occurring by random chance is about as slim as finding a four-leaf clover in a haystack.

To visually depict this captivating correlation, we present the scatterplot in Fig. 1, which illustrates the tight clustering of data points and the unmistakable upward trend. This scatterplot serves as a testament to the surprising intersection of housing expenditures and CME's stock price, inviting readers to marvel at this curious connection.

Overall, our findings underscore the peculiar nature of financial markets, where seemingly disparate factors can intertwine in unexpected and, at times, comical ways. The correlation between annual US household spending on housing and the stock price of CME Group is a conundrum that not only defies conventional economic reasoning but also adds a touch of whimsy to the world of financial analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on housing and CME Group's stock price (CME). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Housing Habits and CME: A Correlation Catastrophe?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research study investigates the entangled relationship between annual US household spending on housing and the stock price of CME Group. With a hefty dose of humor, we delve into the data from 2003 to 2022, sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), to uncover the peculiar correlation. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9340040 with a p-value less than 0.01, prompting us to ponder whether CME's fortunes are hitched to the housing habits of the American populace. We explore this quirky correlation, inviting readers to chuckle as we uncover the surprising intersection of housing expenditures and CME's stock price.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. (2015) provide a comprehensive analysis of the factors affecting annual US household spending on housing, highlighting the impact of income levels, interest rates, and demographic trends on housing expenditures. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) offer a detailed examination of the financial performance of CME Group, emphasizing the influence of market volatility, trading volumes, and macroeconomic indicators on the stock price of CME. These serious scholarly works form the cornerstone of our understanding of the individual components in our study – the entangled relationship between housing spending and CME stock prices.
In "The Big Short" by Michael Lewis, the authors vividly portray the housing market collapse of the mid-2000s, shedding light on the intricacies of the mortgage industry and its far-reaching impact. Building on this notion of interconnectedness, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offers a deeper exploration of the unanticipated relationships between seemingly disparate economic factors, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the unexpected correlation between housing habits and CME stock prices.
Turning to fiction, "House of Leaves" by Mark Z. Danielewski and "The Haunting of Hill House" by Shirley Jackson present eerie narratives set within enigmatic dwellings, prompting readers to ponder the mysterious forces at play within the confines of residential spaces. While these literary works may seem far removed from the realm of financial analysis, they serve as a whimsical reminder of the unpredictability and inexplicable connections that pervade both the housing market and stock price movements.
Drawing inspiration from the world of board games, the classic game of Monopoly offers a light-hearted yet surprisingly relevant perspective on property ownership and financial investment. As players eagerly vie for control of coveted properties and strategically navigate the ups and downs of the real estate market, the parallels to the dynamics of housing expenditures and stock prices become increasingly apparent. Additionally, the game of Clue, with its mysterious mansion setting and clues to untangle, serves as a playful analogy for the intricate puzzle of deciphering the relationship between housing habits and CME stock price movements.
While these diverse sources may seem unrelated at first glance, they collectively contribute to our lighthearted yet rigorous exploration of the connection between annual US household spending on housing and the stock price of CME Group.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data from 2003 to 2022 revealed a remarkable and unexpected correlation between annual US household spending on housing and the stock price of CME Group. The correlation coefficient of 0.9340040 indicates a very strong positive relationship between these two variables. In other words, as annual household spending on housing increases, the stock price of CME Group tends to rise as well. This finding left our research team both baffled and amused, prompting us to coin the term "household-stock symbiosis" to capture the whimsical nature of this correlation.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8723635 suggests that approximately 87.24% of the variance in CME Group's stock price can be explained by the annual household spending on housing. It appears that the housing habits of the American populace have a surprisingly substantial influence on the stock price of CME Group, much like the elder sibling who exerts an unexpected amount of control over the rest of the family.
The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant, leading us to dismiss the possibility that this relationship is merely a fluke. The likelihood of such a strong correlation occurring by random chance is about as slim as finding a four-leaf clover in a haystack.
To visually depict this captivating correlation, we present the scatterplot in Fig. 1, which illustrates the tight clustering of data points and the unmistakable upward trend. This scatterplot serves as a testament to the surprising intersection of housing expenditures and CME's stock price, inviting readers to marvel at this curious connection.
Overall, our findings underscore the peculiar nature of financial markets, where seemingly disparate factors can intertwine in unexpected and, at times, comical ways. The correlation between annual US household spending on housing and the stock price of CME Group is a conundrum that not only defies conventional economic reasoning but also adds a touch of whimsy to the world of financial analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study provide compelling evidence for the unexpected connection between annual US household spending on housing and the stock price of CME Group. Our results align with prior research by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018), confirming that income levels, interest rates, and demographic trends indeed play a significant role in shaping housing expenditures. Similarly, market volatility, trading volumes, and macroeconomic indicators, as investigated by Doe and Jones (2018), exert substantial influence on the stock price of CME Group.

Drawing on the comical elements highlighted in the literature review, we stand amazed by the parallelism between our results and the whimsical analogy of the elder sibling exerting unexpected control over the family. The housing habits of the American populace seem to wield astonishing power over the stock price of CME Group, much like the mischievous elder relative in a family dynamic.

Moreover, our findings affirm the spirit of "The Big Short" and "Freakonomics," as they unveil the intricate interplay of seemingly unrelated economic factors. This correlation defies conventional economic reasoning, forming a delightful enigma reminiscent of the mysterious forces at play within the narratives of "House of Leaves" and "The Haunting of Hill House." The financial world, it seems, is not devoid of its own unanticipated connections and inexplicable relationships.

In the context of the board game analogies, our results evoke the strategic maneuvering and unexpected outcomes inherent in games like Monopoly and Clue. Much like the calculated property acquisitions and serendipitous discoveries in these games, the correlation between housing expenditures and CME's stock price reflects an intertwining of seemingly disparate realms, adding a touch of whimsy to the world of financial analysis.

In essence, our study contributes to the expanding literature on the quirks and curiosities of financial markets. The "household-stock symbiosis" uncovered in our research not only challenges traditional economic paradigms but also infuses an element of amusement into the often solemn field of financial analysis. As we continue to unravel the mysteries of economic correlations, we are reminded that the financial world, much like life itself, is rife with surprises, confounding expectations, and eliciting laughter in its unexpected revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on housing and CME Group's stock price (CME). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Housing Habits and CME: A Correlation Catastrophe?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research study investigates the entangled relationship between annual US household spending on housing and the stock price of CME Group. With a hefty dose of humor, we delve into the data from 2003 to 2022, sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), to uncover the peculiar correlation. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9340040 with a p-value less than 0.01, prompting us to ponder whether CME's fortunes are hitched to the housing habits of the American populace. We explore this quirky correlation, inviting readers to chuckle as we uncover the surprising intersection of housing expenditures and CME's stock price.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between annual US household spending on housing and stock prices has long been of interest to researchers and investors alike. While the connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables may appear about as logical as a fish riding a bicycle, the realm of financial markets is often filled with surprising correlations and unexpected linkages. In this paper, we take a lighthearted yet rigorous approach to unraveling the enigmatic connection between housing expenditures and the stock price of CME Group.
As we delve into this peculiar correlation, we aim to inject a healthy dose of levity into the often dry world of economic analysis. After all, who says we can't have a bit of fun while crunching numbers and dissecting statistical relationships? So, buckle up and get ready for a rollercoaster ride through the world of housing habits and CME stock prices – it's going to be a wild and whimsical journey!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data from 2003 to 2022 revealed a remarkable and unexpected correlation between annual US household spending on housing and the stock price of CME Group. The correlation coefficient of 0.9340040 indicates a very strong positive relationship between these two variables. In other words, as annual household spending on housing increases, the stock price of CME Group tends to rise as well. This finding left our research team both baffled and amused, prompting us to coin the term "household-stock symbiosis" to capture the whimsical nature of this correlation.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8723635 suggests that approximately 87.24% of the variance in CME Group's stock price can be explained by the annual household spending on housing. It appears that the housing habits of the American populace have a surprisingly substantial influence on the stock price of CME Group, much like the elder sibling who exerts an unexpected amount of control over the rest of the family.
The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant, leading us to dismiss the possibility that this relationship is merely a fluke. The likelihood of such a strong correlation occurring by random chance is about as slim as finding a four-leaf clover in a haystack.
To visually depict this captivating correlation, we present the scatterplot in Fig. 1, which illustrates the tight clustering of data points and the unmistakable upward trend. This scatterplot serves as a testament to the surprising intersection of housing expenditures and CME's stock price, inviting readers to marvel at this curious connection.
Overall, our findings underscore the peculiar nature of financial markets, where seemingly disparate factors can intertwine in unexpected and, at times, comical ways. The correlation between annual US household spending on housing and the stock price of CME Group is a conundrum that not only defies conventional economic reasoning but also adds a touch of whimsy to the world of financial analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the correlation between annual US household spending on housing and CME Group's stock price has uncovered a relationship so strong it makes the bond between peanut butter and jelly look weak. The almost absurdly high correlation coefficient of 0.9340040 left us scratching our heads and wondering if we accidentally stumbled into a parallel universe where household expenditures and stock prices engage in synchronized swimming.

The r-squared value of 0.8723635 further solidifies the notion that CME Group's stock price is like putty in the hands of housing spending, bending and shaping itself to match the housing habits of the American populace.

The statistically significant p-value has convinced us that this correlation is no mere fluke – it's as real as Santa Claus during Christmas season. And just like Santa Claus, this eyebrow-raising correlation brings a sense of wonder and amusement to the otherwise serious world of economic analysis.

Our scatterplot, which resembles a tight flock of geese flying in perfect formation, serves as a visual reminder of the unexpected and humorous intersection of housing expenditures and CME's stock price. It's as if these two variables are engaged in a whimsical dance, twirling and swirling with unrestrained glee.

Therefore, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, as we have stumbled onto a correlation so captivating and quirky that it deserves a place in the hall of fame of financial oddities. With this, we bid adieu to the world of housing habits and stock prices, knowing that we have added a touch of hilarity to the often stern domain of economic analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Housing Habits and CME: A Correlation Catastrophe?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Quantitative Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Housing Habits and CME: A Correlation Catastrophe?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Zany Sociological Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Housing Habits and CME: A Correlation Catastrophe? with an abstract of This research study investigates the entangled relationship between annual US household spending on housing and the stock price of CME Group. With a hefty dose of humor, we delve into the data from 2003 to 2022, sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), to uncover the peculiar correlation. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9340040 with a p-value less than 0.01, prompting us to ponder whether CME's fortunes are hitched to the housing habits of the American populace. We explore this quirky correlation, inviting readers to chuckle as we uncover the surprising intersection of housing expenditures and CME's stock price.

ChatGPT:

US household spending on housing, CME Group, correlation, housing habits, stock price, Bureau of Labor Statistics, LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), correlation coefficient, p-value, American populace, housing expenditures

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Annual US household spending on housing
Detailed data title: Average annual household spend on housing
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
See what else correlates with Annual US household spending on housing

CME Group's stock price (CME)
Detailed data title: Opening price of CME Group (CME) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with CME Group's stock price (CME)

Correlation r = 0.9340040 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8723635 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 87.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., CME Group's stock price (CME)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Annual US household spending on housing) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.8E-9. 0.0000000017724516379017791000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 1.8E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 564,190,288 random variables You don't actually need 564 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.84, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Annual US household spending on housing (Household spend)1343213918151671636616920171091689516557168031688717148177981840918886198842009120679214092262424298
CME Group's stock price (CME) (Stock price)7.6212.6639.9964.3990.09119.7835.7159.156.443.244.7970.2682.1884.38113.43146.12186.46201.11183.1229.13




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([13432,13918,15167,16366,16920,17109,16895,16557,16803,16887,17148,17798,18409,18886,19884,20091,20679,21409,22624,24298,])
array_2 = np.array([7.62,12.66,39.99,64.39,90.09,119.78,35.71,59.1,56.4,43.2,44.79,70.26,82.18,84.38,113.43,146.12,186.46,201.11,183.1,229.13,])
array_1_name = "Annual US household spending on housing"
array_2_name = "CME Group's stock price (CME)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 3321 · Black Variable ID: 19903 · Red Variable ID: 1670
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0